Challenges of 21 st Century Toxicology

Similar documents
Robert G. Sussman, Ph.D., DABT Managing Principal, Eastern Operations. SafeBridge Consultants, Inc. Mountain View, CA New York, NY Liverpool, UK

ENV 455 Hazardous Waste Management

NEXT GENERATION RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CONSUMER SAFETY OF COSMETICS: A CASE STUDY APPROACH

Dose and Response for Chemicals

TNsG on Annex I Inclusion Revision of Chapter 4.1: Quantitative Human Health Risk Characterisation

Proactive Integration of Occupational Toxicology Assessments into the Drug Development Process

Case Study Application of the WHO Framework for Combined Exposures. Presented by: M.E. (Bette) Meek University of Ottawa

Environmental Risk Assessment Toxicity Assessment

Welcome and introduction to EFSA

Human Health Risk Assessment Overview [For the APS/OPP Roundtable]

What are the challenges in addressing adjustments for data uncertainty?

SAFETY EVALUATION OF FOODS: NOVEL INGREDIENTS & ADDITIVES

Skin Sensitization MoA/AOP pathway elucidation: Applying the Skin Sensitization AOP to Risk Assessment

Exposure Assessment of Food Additives. Dr. V.Sudershan Rao Deputy Director (Scientist E) National Institute of Nutrition Hyderabad

Introduction to principles of toxicology and risk assessment

HOW GOOD ARE VALIDATED METHODS TO PREDICT TOXICITY OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF SUBSTANCES AND PRODUCTS?

Applicators and Pesticide Toxicity

Plant toxicology and risk assessment

Evaluation of Potential Human Health Effects from Environmental Exposure to Human Pharmaceuticals

The role of biokinetics in in vitro tests and the interpretation of results. Emanuela Testai

Threshold Establishment and Rationale. Douglas J Ball, MS, DABT Research Fellow Pfizer Worldwide R&D

Human health effects of antimony an update

Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON TOXICITY, ECOTOXICITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CSTEE) Opinion on the results of the Risk Assessment of:

alternative short-chain fluorinated product technology

Current research initiatives on human and environmental health effects of

Mr. Bruce Allen. Dr. Harvey Clewell.

Risk Assessment of Naturals

area of toxicology: The following are examples of some LD50 Values LD50 Dose Response Curve Sample

Safety evaluation: hazard and risk

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Element B1 / 5 Toxicology and Testing

METHACRYLIC ACID CAS N :

Quantitative Risk Assessment: An Overview and Discussion of Emerging Issues. Anne-Marie Nicol, PhD

Development of safe levels of elemental impurities

Food allergens: Challenges for risk assessment

Basic toxicology and biomaterials testing

CASE STUDY PRESENTATION: A QUANTITATIVE AOP FOR SKIN SENSITISATION RISK ASSESSMENT

Safety Data Sheet. : 125 ml Screen Cleaning Spray and 20 Absorbent Wipes

Risk Assessment Report on sodium hypochlorite Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No

Dose response relationships: biological and modeling aspects

SAFETY DATA SHEET according to Regulation (EU) 2015/830

Regulatory need for non-animal approaches for skin sensitisation hazard assessment. Janine Ezendam

Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Foods- WHO Principles and Methods

EU Safety Data Sheet. Enzyme Conjugate. 1 Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company

Pesticide Risk in Perspective

TARGETED RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT ON SODIUM HYDROXIDE (NAOH) HUMAN HEALTH PART. CAS No.: ; EINECS No.:

Safety Data Sheet. : 100 Antibacterial Screen Cleaning Wipes. : A mix of biocidal and cleansing agents impregnated onto non-woven wipe fabric.

The role of expert judgement and conceptual approaches in setting OELs by the German MAK commission

Application of the calculation method in regulatory risk assessment. Part 1 The issue of animal studies

G136 QUIK DETAILER INTERIOR

CONSUMER BEHAVIOUR: OVERLAPS BETWEEN HEALTH, SAFETY, WASTE & SUSTAINABILITY

The Director General Maisons-Alfort, 30 July 2018 OPINION. of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety

Distinguishing between Mode and Mechanism of Action

Chapter 4: More about Relationships between Two-Variables Review Sheet

Occupational Hygiene. Occupational Hygiene. Programme (MS) Mike Slater. Risk Assessment

Exposure-response in the presence of confounding

Sodium Dichromate (VI) Anhydrous

SATIETY AND APPETITE CONTROL CLAIMS: GETTING IT RIGHT FOR CONSUMERS

Justification for the selection of a candidate CoRAP substance

Pizza Pan Case Study

Presenting Uncertainty in the Context of Toxicological, Biological Monitoring and Exposure Information. William H.

The role of JECFA for CCFA

Introduction to Food Toxicology

EVE 489/589 Toxicology

CHEMICAL IDENTITY. INCI NAME: propylene glycol IUPAC: propane-1,2-diol CAS: EC NUMBER: EMPIRICAL FORMULA: C3H8O2 STRUCTURAL FORMULA:

N-Methylneodecanamide (MNDA)

: Sika Grout HP

Minutes of EFSA-ANSES Expert Meeting on Bisphenol A (BPA) Art. 30 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Held on 3 December 2014, Paris (France)

Putting thresholds into practice: where are we now?

Current status of Benchmark Dose Modeling for 3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD)

Report on Public Consultation

TRIS (NONYLPHENYL) PHOSPHITE SUMMARY RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT

Blend of ingredients. Active ingredient is an antibiotic. VibraVet 100 Paste for Cats and Dogs

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

MAT Mathematics in Today's World

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS. CAS No.: EINECS No.: REPORT VERSION: Draft of 24 April 2001

Assessing the sensitization/irritation properties of micro organisms. Gregorio Loprieno Prevention Medicine Local Health Authority 2 Lucca (Italy)

SAFETY DATA SHEET Janitol Wash Up According to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, Annex II, as amended.

FDA Expectations and Evaluation of Inhalation Toxicology Studies

CPH601 Chapter 3 Risk Assessment

An In Vitro Alternative For Predicting Systemic Toxicity. By: James McKim, Ph.D., DABT Chief Science Officer

Dermal Sensitization Quantitative Risk Assessment (QRA) For Fragrance Ingredients

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Strategies for health interpretation: development of HBM healthbased guidance values for individual phthalates and BPA

Zinc: Issues and Update. Craig Boreiko, Ph.D. Ottawa May 2008

Pulpdent Corporation Revision Date: May 21, 2014 Safety Data Sheet. 1.1 Commercial product name / designation Root Canal Sealer Powder and Liquid

Cumulative Risk Assessment

CAS-No. EC-No. Index-No. Concentration Dihydrogen wolframate

The Chronic Cancer Bioassay Is Frequently Conducted for Pesticides When It Is Not Always Needed to Protect Human Health

Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration] - response for human health

Safety data sheet according to 1907/2006/EC, Article 31

Mathematically Modeling Biochemistry

Substance Evaluation Conclusion document EC No SUBSTANCE EVALUATION CONCLUSION DOCUMENT. as required by REACH Article 48.

Tetrachloroethylene: Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) Draft Toxicological Review Kate Z. Guyton, PhD DABT

Name of Chemical: Etoxazole Reason for Issuance: Conditional Registration Date Issued: August 2002

Read-across illustrative example

Transcription:

Challenges of 21 st Century Toxicology Toxicology and Mathematical Modelling 2 nd March 2012 Cameron MacKay Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre

What is Unilever? Consumer goods company Unilever s portfolio of categories 2bn consumers worldwide use a Unilever product on any day Products sold in more than 180 countries Personal Care Homecare Ice Cream & Beverages Savoury, Dressings & Spreads Brands

What is? We provide the scientific evidence and expertise so that Unilever can identify and manage: Risks for consumers, workers and environment Safety of products and supply chain technology Risk is the chance of an adverse outcome Environmental impacts Sustainability an adverse of Unilever s health or environmental brands, products effect & supply chain

Terminology: Risk, Hazard & Exposure Hazard: the list of adverse effects a chemical is known to induce (e.g. irritant, corrosive) Hazard characterisation: a dose response relationship of the chemical to the adverse effect (LOEL, NOAEL, BmD) Exposure: The amount of chemical the consumer is exposed to (mg/kg/day, ug/cm 2, mm, mg/m3) Safety decisions are based on Risk: usually the ratio of the Effect level to the Exposure level P(Adverse Event Occurring Exposure level, Effect level)

All substances are poisons; there is none which is not a poison. The right dose differentiates a poison from a remedy. Paracelsus (1493-1541)

Toxicology: Risk Assessment Strategy Tox Endpoint Skin Sensitisation NOAEL Carcinogenicity Systemic Tox NOAEL 10-1000

Where s the maths? Tox Endpoint Skin Sensitisation Carcinogenicity Systemic Tox Data-driven models of hazard (Q)uantitative (S)tructural (A)ctivity (R)elationships Similar chemicals => similar activity Structures quantified properties Regression models Predictors: chemical properties Response: biological activity Biological activity: concentration required to give a certain response EC50: conc. that gives 50% effect

Where s the maths? Dose-Response Modelling Determine the adverse effect level (+ uncertainty) Regression modelling Effects: continuous, categorical, present/absent

Where s the maths? Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models (PBPK) / Toxicokinetics Prediction of concentration at target: Blood / Organ / Intracellular Ordinary differential equation models State variables are ingredient/drug concentrations Determine bioavailability and species extrapolation

Toxicology: where s the challenge?

Current Challenges 1. What are the sequence of events leading to an adverse effect? Modification of skin proteins allergic contact dermatitis DNA damage perturbation of p53 pathway cancer???? mitochondrial toxicity myopathy & pancreatitis

Current Challenges 2. When we understand the sequence of events can we use in vitro models (receptor occupancy, cellular responses) mathematical modelling (systems biology, organ models) to link dose responses across scales of biological organisation

Current Challenges For known toxins and adverse outcome pathways we can pick a few case studies and make a start on linking levels together e.g. modelling of p53 and the skin allergy response The majority of the time we will not know the sequence of events

Current Challenges What can be done if we don t know the sequence of events? Need to appeal to knowledge of the exposure and chemistry A = some measure of activity for an ingredient across space of receptors Obtained from chemical structure or in vitro assays C = concentration at the target site Obtained from PBPK models E = the presence or absence of a pharmacological effect Ideally in humans from clinical studies, possibly adverse events data Use the above to calculate P(E A, C) Vary chemical/dose to ensure the probability remains acceptably small

Summary Toxicology risk assessment has focused on apical endpoints measured in experimental animals at high doses extrapolation of effect levels in these tests to humans comparison of extrapolated effect level to human exposure indirect estimates of risk (ratio of effect level to exposure) deterministic output with systematic bias NOAEL 10-1000

Summary Future Challenges 1. Understanding the mechanisms of toxicity from molecular initiating event to adverse effect 2. When the sequence is known, using in vitro and math models to link dose responses across biological scales 3. When the sequence is unknown, being able to say something about P(adverse effect exposure, activity) based on human data