Supplementary Online Content

Similar documents
Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Learning Objectives. Guidelines. Update on Lifestyle Guidelines

Supplement materials:

Andrew Cohen, MD and Neil S. Skolnik, MD INTRODUCTION

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Supplementary Online Content

Lipid Management Step Therapy Criteria with Medical Diagnoses Option*

In-Ho Chae. Seoul National University College of Medicine

GALECTIN-3 PREDICTS LONG TERM CARDIOVASCULAR DEATH IN HIGH-RISK CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PATIENTS

2013 ACC AHA LIPID GUIDELINE JAY S. FONTE, MD

John J.P. Kastelein MD PhD Professor of Medicine Dept. of Vascular Medicine Academic Medial Center / University of Amsterdam

Is Lower Better for LDL or is there a Sweet Spot

Lipids What s new? Meera Jain, MD Providence Portland Medical Center

Disclosures No relationships (not even to an employer) No off-label uses. Cholesterol Lowering Guidelines: What now?

CLINICAL OUTCOME Vs SURROGATE MARKER

Supplementary Online Content

Weigh the benefit of statin treatment: LDL & Beyond

How would you manage Ms. Gold

Dyslipidemia in the light of Current Guidelines - Do we change our Practice?

JUPITER NEJM Poll. Panel Discussion: Literature that Should Have an Impact on our Practice: The JUPITER Study

Supplementary Online Content

The JUPITER trial: What does it tell us? Alice Y.Y. Cheng, MD, FRCPC January 24, 2009

Supplementary Online Content

What do the guidelines say about combination therapy?

Long-term prognostic value of N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) changes within one year in patients with coronary heart disease

4/7/ The stats on heart disease. + Deaths & Age-Adjusted Death Rates for

Chapter 4: Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With CKD

Statin therapy in patients with Mild to Moderate Coronary Stenosis by 64-slice Multidetector Coronary Computed Tomography

Supplementary Appendix

Drug Class Review HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins) and Fixed-dose Combination Products Containing a Statin

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary appendix

Review of guidelines for management of dyslipidemia in diabetic patients

Supplementary Online Content

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

LEADER Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

The MAIN-COMPARE Registry

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

Discontinuation and restarting in patients on statin treatment: prospective open cohort study using a primary care database

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

Supplementary Online Content

CHOLESTEROL-LOWERING THERAPHY

Know Your Number Aggregate Report Single Analysis Compared to National Averages

Comparability of patient-reported health status: multi-country analysis of EQ-5D responses in patients with type 2 diabetes

Supplementary Online Content

Cholesterol Management Roy Gandolfi, MD

Chapter 2: Pharmacological cholesterol-lowering treatment in adults Kidney International Supplements (2013) 3, ; doi: /kisup.2013.

Statistical Fact Sheet Populations

Impact of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor versus Angiotensin Receptor Blocker on Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus in Asians

dr. Giuseppe Marazzi None conflict of interest

Controlling Cholesterol and Diet Modifications

Low ALT Levels Independently Associated with 22-Year All-Cause Mortality Among Coronary Heart Disease Patients

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Supplementary Online Content

Advanced Treatment of LDL: How Low Should You Go?

Advanced Treatment of LDL: How Low Should You Go?

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Disclosures. Diabetes and Cardiovascular Risk Management. Learning Objectives. Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease

ATP IV: Predicting Guideline Updates

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials Prevention Of CVD in Women"

Improved control for confounding using propensity scores and instrumental variables?

Do Women Benefit From Statins for Primary Prevention?: Controversy, Challenges and Consensus

No relevant financial relationships

PIEDMONT ACCESS TO HEALTH SERVICES, INC. Guidelines for Screening and Management of Dyslipidemia

Lecture 8 Cardiovascular Health Lecture 8 1. Introduction 2. Cardiovascular Health 3. Stroke 4. Contributing Factors

Treating Hyperlipidemias in Adults. Lisa R. Tannock MD Division of Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, University of Kentucky Lexington KY VAMC

Placebo-Controlled Statin Trials MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL MANAGEMENT OF HIGH BLOOD CHOLESTEROL: IMPLICATIONS OF THE NEW GUIDELINES

Supplementary Online Content

Cost effectiveness of statin therapy for the primary prevention of coronary heart disease in Ireland Nash A, Barry M, Walshe V

Supplementary Online Content. Abed HS, Wittert GA, Leong DP, et al. Effect of weight reduction and

Statins for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Women: Review of the Evidence

Supplementary Online Content

Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Macrovascular Complication

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Cardiovascular Risk Factors

The TNT Trial Is It Time to Shift Our Goals in Clinical

Supplementary Online Content

Disclosures. Pediatric Dyslipidemia Casey Elkins, DNP, NP C, CLS, FNLA. Learning Objectives. Atherogenesis. Acceptable Values

Supplementary Online Content

Get a Statin or Not? Learning objectives. Presentation overview 4/3/2018. Treatment Strategies in Dyslipidemia Management

MOLINA HEALTHCARE OF CALIFORNIA

Does High-Intensity Pitavastatin Therapy Further Improve Clinical Outcomes?

Why is co-morbidity important for cancer patients? Michael Chapman Research Programme Manager

Supplement Table 2. Categorization of Statin Intensity Based on Potential Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Reduction

Drug Class Review on HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors (Statins)

Hypertension Guidelines: JNC- Late, JNC- 8, or JNC- Fake?

STATIN UTILIZATION MANAGEMENT CRITERIA

ZEUS Trial ezetimibe Ultrasound Study

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Assessing Cardiac Risk in Noncardiac Surgery. Murali Sivarajan, M.D. Professor University of Washington Seattle, Washington

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters

10/8/2018. Lecture 9. Cardiovascular Health. Lecture Heart 2. Cardiovascular Health 3. Stroke 4. Contributing Factor

Central pressures and prediction of cardiovascular events in erectile dysfunction patients

Supplementary Online Content

Diabetes: Use of Adjunctive Therapy ACEs, ARBs, ASA & STATINs --Oh My! Veronica J. Brady, PhD, FNP-BC, BC-ADM, CDE Project ECHO April 19, 2018

Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes

Transcription:

Supplementary Online Content Leibowitz M, Karpati T, Cohen-Stavi CJ, et al. Association between achieved low-density lipoprotein levels and major adverse cardiac events in patients with stable ischemic heart disease taking statin treatment. JAMA Intern Med. Published online June 20, 2016. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.2751 etable 1. Statin potency classification based on US Food and Drug Administration s classification etable 2. ICD-9 codes for outcomes of MACE etable 3. Number of events by LDL-C group for each individual component of MACE etable 4. Variables included in PS and Cox models efigure 1a. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for low versus moderate LDL-C groups efigure 1b. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for moderate versus high LDL-C groups efigure 2a. Distribution of the PS before and after matching: Low versus Moderate LDL-C groups efigure 2b. Distribution of the PS before and after matching: Moderate versus High LDL-C group efigure 3. Calculation of the standardized difference for each kind of variable etable 5a. Standardized difference before and after matching Low versus Moderate LDL- C groups etable 5b. Standardized difference before and after matching Moderate versus High LDL- C groups etable 6a. After propensity-matching Low versus Moderate LDL-C groups etable 6b. After propensity-matching Moderate versus High LDL-C groups This supplementary material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional information about their work.

etable 1. Statin potency classification based on US Food and Drug Administration s classification Potency Category Atorva a Fluva b Pitava c Lova d Prava e Rosuva f Simva g % LDL-C h Low 40 mg 1 mg 20 20 mg 10 mg 30% mg 10 mg 80 mg 2 mg 40 40 mg 20 mg 38% mg Moderate 20 mg 4 mg 80 80 mg 5 mg 40 mg 41% mg High 40 mg 10 mg 80 mg 47% 80 mg 20 mg 55% 40 mg 63% Preparations equivalent to Simvastatin 20mgm (38% LDL-C lowering) are classified as low intensity, preparations equivalent to Simvastatin 40mgm (41% LDL-C lowering) are moderate intensity, and all preparations with higher lipid lowering effects are classified as high intensity, equivalent to Simvastatin 80mgm. a. Atorva Atorvastatin; b. Fluva Fluvastatin; c. Pitava Pitavastatin; d. Lova Lovastatin; e. Prava Pravastatin; f. Rosuva Rosuvastatin; g. Simva Simvastatin; h. LDL- C Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol

etable 2. ICD-9 a codes for outcomes of MACE b Outcome ICD-9 codes Myocardial infarction 410 and related sub-classifications Unstable angina 411.1, 411.8, 411.81, 413.0, 413.1 Stroke 433.01, 433.11, 433.21, 433.31, 433.81, 433.91 Percutaneous coronary intervention procedural code 36 Coronary artery bypass grafting procedural code 36.1 a. ICD-9 International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision; b. MACE Major adverse cardiac events

etable 3. Number of events by LDL-C a group for each individual component of MACE b LDL-C group Low ( 70mg/dl) Moderate (70.1-100mg/dl) High (100.1-130mg/dl) Population N 9,086 16,782 5,751 All-cause mortality 693 1,021 437 Acute MI c 421 778 307 CABG d 113 200 71 PTCA e 794 1,442 511 CVA f 189 302 144 Angina 471 852 289 Total MACE 2,681 4,595 1,759 a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein; b. MACE Major adverse cardiac events; c. MI Myocardial infarction; d. CABG Coronary artery bypass grafting; e. PTCA Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; f. CVA Cerebrovascular accident

etable 4. Variables included in PS a and Cox models Variables Low vs Moderate Moderate vs High Cox PS Cox PS Age X X X X Sex X X X X Ethnicity (Jews / Arabs) X X X X SES b (Low / Medium-High) X X X X Residence (Urban / Rural) X X BMI c (<18.5 / 18.5-24.9 / 25.0-29.9 / 30+ / No X X measure) Smoking status (Non-smoker / Actual smoker) X X X X Glucose level (Low / Normal / Borderline / High / X X Very high / No measure) Diabetic (No / Yes) X X X X Insulin use (No / Yes) X X X Statin potency (Low / Medium / High) X X Time on statin (Categorical: 12-23m / 24-71m / X X 72m+) Time on statin (Continuous in months) X X Other non-statin lipid lowering meds (No / Yes) X X HDL X Total Cholesterol Triglycerides Visits above 24 (No / Yes) X X X X Lipid profiles above 9 (No / Yes) X X Chronic meds count (0-4 / 5-7 / 8+) X X CKD d stage (1 / 2 / 3A / 3B / 4 / 5 / Unclassified) X X X Number of angioplasties (PTCA) X X X Charlson risk score (0-1 / 2 / 3-4 / 5+) X X X X a. PS Propensity score; b. SES Socioeconomic status; c. BMI Body mass index; d. CKD Chronic Kidney Disease. For the Cox regression, variables that were thought to be clinical predictors of the appearance of a MACE event were included into the model. For the PS secondary analysis, variables that were considered to be predictors of being in a specific LDL-C group were included in the PS model. The effect of each variable on the multivariable model was assessed for instability and collinearity. Forward stepwise analysis was used to select the variables that were included in the final model. Age and sex were forced into the model if the stepwise analysis excluded them.

efigure 1a. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for low versus moderate LDL-C a groups a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein

efigure 1b. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for moderate versus high LDL-C a groups a. LDL-C. Low-density lipoprotein

efigure 2a. Distribution of the PS a before and after matching: Low versus Moderate LDL- C b groups a. PS Propensity score; b. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein

efigure 2b. Distribution of the PS a before and after matching: Moderate versus High LDL- C b group a. PS Propensity score; b. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein

efigure 3. Calculation of the standardized difference for each kind of variable For continuous variables the formula is based on the means and standard deviation: 2 Where denote the sample mean and denote the variance of the variables in the treatment and control groups. For binary categorical variables, the standard difference is calculated as follows: 1 1 2 Where denotes the proportion of the binary variable in the treatment and control groups. For multi-categorical variables, the standard difference is calculated as in the case of binary categories, but for each category in the variable separately.

etable 5a. Standardized difference before and after matching Low versus Moderate LDL-C a groups Variable Difference Before Difference After 30-49y -0.692 0.308 Age 65-74y 3.572-1.047 75y+ 2.131 1.915 Sex Female -8.499 0.797 Smoking Smoker -3.65-0.446 Missing -1.781 0.079 Diabetes Yes 21.216 0.489 2-6.004 0.197 3A -4.767-0.634 CKD 3B 5.159 0.125 4 7.113 0.163 5 3.443 0.327 Unknown 5.914 0.437 Time on statins 12-23 11.535 0.507 24-71 16.272-0.925 Visits >24 12.088-0.628 Lipid Profiles >9 9.694-1.517 Low 21.803 0.311 HDL High -10.785 0.109 Missing 1.837 0.266 Low 1.102 0.000 Borderline -3.298-0.752 Glucose High 12.749 0.347 Very high 11.009-0.714 Not measured 1.695-0.336 Medium 3.77 0.544 Statin Potency High -2.076-0.549 missing -0.255-0.766 Chronic meds 0-4 -12.659-1.112 Charlson score 4-5 -11.053-0.166 0-1 -6.473-0.059 2-9.557-0.122 3-4 -8.998-1.254 Unknown 3.885 0.795 Non-statins meds Yes 8.27-0.331 a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein; b. SES Socioeconomic status; c. CKD Chronic kidney disease; d. PTCA - Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty The groups were matched 1:1 using a greedy algorithm technique, and the best fit model was chosen by the Akaike information criterion measure. After matching, the standardized difference for each of the variables in the PS model was calculated using different formulas depending on whether the variables were continuous, binary categorical or multi-categorical, and then

compared to the differences before matching. A difference greater than the absolute value of 10 is considered unbalanced.[8]

etable 5b. Standardized difference before and after matching Moderate versus High LDL-C a groups Variable Difference Before Difference After Age 30-49 -1.61-0.27 65-74 3.53-0.55 75+ 3.18 1.39 Sex 2-8.17 0.00 Residence Rural -3.86-0.60 Unknown 0.40 0.12 Smoker Smoker -3.60-1.73 Missing -1.14-0.68 Diabetes Diabetes 21.77-0.20 CKD 2-6.00-1.13 3A -5.15 0.53 3B 4.63-0.10 4 6.77 0.08 5 4.32 1.38 Unknown 5.85-0.52 Time on Statin 12-23 9.92-1.18 24-71 16.94 0.74 Visits >24 11.50-0.70 Lipid Profiles >9 9.70-0.81 PTCA 1 5.74-0.57 2 5.74-0.31 3+ 3.49-0.32 HDL Low 23.14-0.87 High -11.81 0.00 Missing 1.56-0.53 Total Cholesterol Low 72.56 0.84 High -15.30-1.55 Missing 1.45-0.48 Triglycerides High 5.42-0.81 Missing 1.47-0.53 Glucose Low 0.33 0.37 Borderline -3.54 0.74 Hyperglycemia 13.78 0.02 Diabetic 10.28-1.15 Unknown 0.96 0.29 Statin potency Medium 0.30 1.38 High -0.61-0.94 missing -0.95 0.18 Chronic Meds 0-4 -13.00-0.09 4-5 -10.25-0.33 Charlson score 0-1 -6.64-1.20 2-9.94-0.06

3-4 -9.28-0.69 Unknown 3.26-0.29 Non-statin meds Yes 5.49 0.91 a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein; b. SES Socioeconomic status; c. BMI Body mass index

etable 6a. After propensity-matching Low versus Moderate LDL-C a groups Characteristics Moderate LDL- Low LDL-C, p value C, 70.1-100 mg/dl* (n=7,879) 70 mg/dl** (n=7,879) Age Mean (SD b ) 67.8 (9.6) 67.7 (9.6) 0.210 Median (IQR c ) 69.0 (61.0-76.0) 68.0 (61.0-75.0) 0.162 30-49 312 (3.5%) 307 (3.5%) 50-64 2,966 (33.6%) 3,003 (34.0%) 65-74 3,037 (34.4%) 3,081 (34.9%) 75-84 2,518 (28.5%) 2,442 (27.6%) 0.626 Sex Male 6,711 (76.0%) 6,741 (76.3%) Female 2,122 (24.0%) 2,092 (23.7%) 0.609 Ethnicity Jewish 7,998 (90.5%) 7,863 (89.0%) Non-Jewish 835 (9.5%) 970 (11.0%) 0.001 SES d Mid-High 6,026 (68.2%) 5,881 (66.6%) Low 2,807 (31.8%) 2,952 (33.4%) 0.021 Index LDL-C Mean (SD) 58.5 (9.7) 83.7 (8.3) 0.000 Median (IQR) 60.9 (53.7-66.0) 83.0 (76.6-90.4) 0.000 HDL e Mean (SD) 45.2 (11.9) 45.9 (11.5) 0.000 Median (IQR) 43.0 (37.0-51.0) 44.0 (38.0-52.0) 0.000 BMI f Mean (SD) 29.1 (5.1) 29.3 (5.2) 0.089 Median (IQR) 28.4 (25.7-31.6) 28.4 (25.9-31.8) 0.052 <18.5 14 (0.2%) 20 (0.2%) 18.5-24.9 1,647 (18.6%) 1,553 (17.6%) 25.0-29.9 3,941 (44.6%) 3,908 (44.2%) 30+ 3,115 (35.3%) 3,242 (36.7%) Unknown 116 (1.3%) 110 (1.2%) 0.155 Chronic diseases Diabetics 5,446 (61.7%) 5,425 (61.4%) 0.757 Use Insulin 688 (7.8%) 629 (7.1%) 0.097 Hypertension 3,975 (45.0%) 4,002 (45.3%) 0.694 CHF g 1,611 (18.2%) 1,582 (17.9%) 0.584 AF h 1,185 (13.4%) 1,090 (12.3%) 0.035 CVA i 61 (0.7%) 62 (0.7%) 1.000 Charlson score 0-1 332 (3.8%) 333 (3.8%) 2 741 (8.4%) 744 (8.4%) 3-4 2,495 (28.2%) 2,545 (28.8%) 5+ 5,197 (58.8%) 5,149 (58.3%) Unknown 68 (0.8%) 62 (0.7%) 0.909 CKD j stage 1 196 (2.2%) 192 (2.2%) 2 1,789 (20.3%) 1,782 (20.2%) 3A 4,349 (49.2%) 4,377 (49.6%)

3B 1,383 (15.7%) 1,379 (15.6%) 4 743 (8.4%) 739 (8.4%) 5 275 (3.1%) 270 (3.1%) Unknown 98 (1.1%) 94 (1.1%) 1.000 PTCA k 0 7,593 (86.0%) 7,603 (86.1%) 1-2 1,186 (13.4%) 1,187 (13.4%) 3+ 54 (0.6%) 43 (0.5%) 0.532 Number of visits >24 5,414 (61.3%) 5,441 (61.6%) 0.688 Numper of lipid profiles >9 4,396 (49.8%) 4,463 (50.5%) 0.321 Time on statins (years) Mean (SD) 6.7 (3.4) 6.9 (3.4) 0.001 Median (IQR) 7.0 (4.0-10.0) 7.0 (4.0-10.0) 0.001 Statin potency Low 439 (5.0%) 435 (4.9%) Medium 4,599 (52.1%) 4,575 (51.8%) High 3,766 (42.6%) 3,790 (42.9%) missing 29 (0.3%) 33 (0.4%) 0.937 Simvastatin 4,706 (53.3%) 4,557 (51.6%) 0.026 Atorvastatin 2,414 (27.3%) 2,886 (32.7%) 0.000 Rosuvastatin 1,578 (17.9%) 1,165 (13.2%) 0.000 Pravastatin 135 (1.5%) 224 (2.5%) 0.000 MACE l (outcome) 2,583 (29.2%) 2,625 (29.7%) 0.499 a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein; b. SD Standard deviation; c. IQR Interquartile range;; d. SES Socioeconomic status; e. HDL High-density lipoprotein; f. BMI Body mass index; g. CHF Congestive heart failure; h. AF Atrial fibrillation; i. CVA Cerebrovascular accident; j. CKD Chronic kidney disease; k. PTCA Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; l. MACE Major adverse cardiac events; *70.1-100mg/dl 1.8mmol/l-2.6mmol/l; **100.1-130mg/dl 2.6-3.4mmol/l;

etable 6b. After propensity-matching Moderate versus High LDL-C a groups Characteristics Moderate LDL-C, High LDL-C, p value 70.1-100 mg/dl* (n=5,739) 100.1-130 mg/dl ** (n=5,739) Age Mean (SD b ) 66.6 (9.9) 66.5 (10.3) 0.445 Median 67.0 (59.0-75.0) 67.0 (59.0-75.0) 0.537 (IQR c ) 30-49 260 (4.5%) 304 (5.3%) 50-64 2,216 (38.6%) 2,246 (39.1%) 65-74 1,792 (31.2%) 1,713 (29.8%) 75+ 1,471 (25.6%) 1,476 (25.7%) 0.143 Sex Male 3,893 (67.8%) 3,884 (67.7%) Female 1,846 (32.2%) 1,855 (32.3%) 0.873 Ethnicity Jewish 4,959 (86.4%) 4,970 (86.6%) Non Jewish 780 (13.6%) 769 (13.4%) 0.785 SES d Med-High 3,668 (63.9%) 3,688 (64.3%) Low 2,071 (36.1%) 2,051 (35.7%) 0.712 Index LDL-C Mean (SD) 84.3 (8.3) 111.2 (7.9) 0.000 Median (IQR) 84.0 (77.2-91.0) 109.8 (104.4-117.0) 0.000 HDL e Mean (SD) 47.6 (11.8) 48.9 (12.5) 0.000 Median (IQR) 46.0 (39.0-54.0) 47.0 (40.0-55.0) 0.000 BMI f Mean (SD) 29.2 (5.1) 29.3 (5.3) 0.249 Median (IQR) 28.4 (25.8-31.8) 28.6 (25.8-31.9) 0.589 <18.5 8 (0.1%) 9 (0.2%) 18.5-24.9 1,050 (18.3%) 1,061 (18.5%) 25.0-29.9 2,432 (42.4%) 2,434 (42.4%) 30+ 2,160 (37.6%) 2,148 (37.4%) Unknown 89 (1.6%) 87 (1.5%) 0.996 Chronic diseases Diabetics 2,894 (50.4%) 2,859 (49.8%) 0.526 Use Insulin 304 (5.3%) 297 (5.2%) 0.801 Hypertension 2,439 (42.5%) 2,456 (42.8%) 0.763 CHF g 882 (15.4%) 897 (15.6%) 0.718 AF h 604 (10.5%) 645 (11.2%) 0.231 CVA i 33 (0.6%) 45 (0.8%) 0.211 Charlson score 0-1 369 (6.4%) 369 (6.4%) 2 669 (11.7%) 660 (11.5%) 3-4 1,804 (31.4%) 1,784 (31.1%) 5+ 2,867 (50.0%) 2,897 (50.5%) Unknown 30 (0.5%) 29 (0.5%) 0.987 CKD j stage 1 164 (2.9%) 163 (2.8%) 2 1,402 (24.4%) 1,374 (23.9%) 3A 2,844 (49.6%) 2,780 (48.4%)

3B 758 (13.2%) 806 (14.0%) 4 386 (6.7%) 414 (7.2%) 5 148 (2.6%) 164 (2.9%) Unknown 37 (0.6%) 38 (0.7%) 0.636 PTCA k 0 5,078 (88.5%) 5,090 (88.7%) 1-2 637 (11.1%) 621 (10.8%) 3+ 24 (0.4%) 28 (0.5%) 0.895 Number of visits >24 3,065 (53.4%) 3,067 (53.4%) 0.985 Numper of lipid profiles >9 2,438 (42.5%) 2,439 (42.5%) 1.000 Time on statins (years) Mean (SD) 7.5 (3.1) 7.6 (3.1) 0.073 Median (IQR) 8.0 (5.0-10.0) 8.0 (5.0-11.0) 0.034 Statin potency High 2,473 (43.1%) 2,459 (42.8%) Low 496 (8.6%) 498 (8.7%) Medium 2,733 (47.6%) 2,748 (47.9%) missing 37 (0.6%) 34 (0.6%) 0.976 Simvastatin 2,823 (49.2%) 2,736 (47.7%) 0.108 Atorvastatin 1,806 (31.5%) 1,999 (34.8%) 0.000 Rosuvastatin 844 (14.7%) 668 (11.6%) 0.000 Pravastatin 265 (4.6%) 335 (5.8%) 0.004 MACE l (outcome) 1,614 (28.1%) 1,757 (30.6%) 0.004 a. LDL-C Low-density lipoprotein; b. SD Standard deviation; c. IQR Interquartile range;; d. SES Socioeconomic status; e. HDL High-density lipoprotein; f. BMI Body mass index; g. CHF Congestive heart failure; h. AF Atrial fibrillation; i. CVA Cerebrovascular accident; j. CKD Chronic kidney disease; k. PTCA Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; l. MACE Major adverse cardiac events; *70.1-100mg/dl 1.8mmol/l-2.6mmol/l; **100.1-130mg/dl 2.6-3.4mmol