1 (I) Groups from Whom Questionnaires Were Collected 21 1 (III) Anti-Semitism Subscale "Offensive" 63 2 (III) Anti-Semitism Subscale "Threatening" 64 3 (III) Anti-Semitism Subscale "Attitudes" 6 4 (III) Anti-Semitism Subscales "Seclusive vs. Intrusive" 66 5 (III) "Neutral" Items in the Anti-Semitism Scale 67 6 (III) The Total Anti-Semitism Scale 68 Public Opinion Questionnaire A The Total Anti-Semitism Scale 69 Public Opinion Questionnaire S 7 (III) Reliability of the Anti-Semitism Scale and Its Subscales 73 8 (III) Intercorrelations of the A-S Subscales 75 9 (III) Anti-Semitism Scale: Item Means and Discriminatory Powers University of California Women 78 10 (III) The Ten-Item A-S Scale (Form 78) 84 11 (III) Reliability of the A-S Scale (Form 78) 86 12 (III) Item Means and Discriminatory Powers. A-S Scale Form 78 87 13 (III) Responses of Mack and Larry on the A-S Scale 90 1 (IV) Ethnocentrism Scale 105 Negro Subscale (N) 2 (IV) Ethnocentrism Scale io6 Minority Subscale (M) 3 (IV) Ethnocentrism Scale io8 Patriotism Subscale (F) 4 (IV) The Total Ethnocentrism Scale i jo Public Opinion Questionnaire E 5 (IV) Reliability of the Ethnocentrism (E) Scale and Its Subscales 112 6 (IV) Correlations of the F Subscales with Each Other and with the Total E Scale i i 7 (IV) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the E-Scale Items ii 8 (IV) The Second Form of the E Scale (Form 78) I 17 9 (IV) Reliability of the E Scale (Form 78) I 19 xxvii
xxviii TABLES AND FIGURES 10 (IV) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the F-Scale Items (Form 78) 120 II (IV) Correlations Between the A-S and E Scales (Initial Forms) 122 12 (IV) Correlations Between the A-S and E Scales (Form 78) 123 13 (IV) The Third Form of the E Scale (Form 60) 124 14 (IV) Reliability of the E Scale (Form 60) 125 15 (IV) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the E-Scale Items (Form 60) 126 16 (IV) The Fourth Form of the E Scale (Forms 45 and 40) 128 17 (IV) Reliability of the F Scale (Forms 45 and 40) A. Groups Taking Form 45 (EA+B) 134 B. Groups Taking Form 40 (EA) 135 C. Groups Taking Both Forms 45 and 40 136 18 (IV) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the E-Scale Items (Forms 45 and 40) 139 19 (IV) Ethnocentrism Scale: Suggested Final Form 142 20 (IV) Responses of Mack and Larry on the E Scale 143 I (V) The Initial Politico-Economic Conservatism Scale (Form 78) 158 2 (V) Reliability of the PEC Scale (Form 78) '59 3 (V) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the PEG-Scale Items (Form 78) i6o 4 (V) The Second Form of the Politico-Economic Conservatism (PEG) Scale (Form 60) 163 5 (V) Reliability of the PEG Scale (Form 60) 165 6 (V) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the PEG-Scale Items (Form 60) 167 7 (V) The Third Form of the Politico-Economic Conservatism (PEG) Scale (Forms 45 40) 169 8 (V) Means and Standard Deviations of PEC-Scale Scores for Groups Taking Forms 45 and 40 170 9 (V) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the PEG-Scale Items (Forms 40 and 45) 174 10 (V) Correlations of the A-S and E Scales with the PEG Scale (All Forms) 179 11 (V) Responses of Mack and Larry on the PEG Scale 183 12 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Showing Various Overall Political Party Preferences i88 13 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Whose Fathers Have Various Political Party Preferences 191 14 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Showing Various Relations Between Subject's and Father's Political Preference 193
xxix 15 (V) Mean E Score for Various Organizations in the Form 40 Sample 194 16 (V) Mean E Score for Groups Having Various Maritime Union Affiliations (Maritime School Sample) 197 17 (V) Mean E Scores for Groups Who Have Various Present Yearly Incomes 198 18 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Having Various Levels of Expected Yearly Income zoo 19 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Whose Fathers Had Various Incomes 202 20 (V) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Whose Fathers Have Various Occupations 205 1 (VI) Mean A-S or E Scores of Various Religious Groups 210 2 (VI) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Showing Various Frequencies of Church Attendance 212 3 (VI) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Showing Various Relations Between Father's Religion and Mother's Religion 214 4 (VI) Mean A-S or E Scores for Groups Showing Various Relations Between Subject's Religion and Mother's Religion 216 5 (VI) Mean A-S Scores of Groups Giving Different Categories of Response to the Question: "How Important Are Religion and the Church?" 217 1 (VII) The F Scale: Form 78 226 2 (VII) Reliability of the F Scale (Form 78) 243 3 (VII) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the F-Scale Items (Form 78) 245 4 (VII) The F Scale: Form 60 248 5 (VII) Reliability of the F Scale (Form 60) 251 6 (VII) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the F-Scale Items (Form 60) 253 7 (VII) F-Scale Clusters: Forms 45 and 40 255 8 (VII) Reliability of the F Scale (Forms 40 and 45) 258 9 (VII) Means and Discriminatory Powers of the F-Scale Items (Forms 40 and 45) 260 10 (VII) Correlations of the F Scale with the A-S, E, and PEG Scales in the Several Forms of the Questionnaire 263 11 (VII) Correlations of the F Scale 'ith Each Half and with the Whole of the E Scale 264 12 (VII) Mean F-Scale Scores of Groups Taking the Several Forms of the Questionnaire z66 13 (VII) Responses of Mack and Larry on the F Scale (Form 78) 270
XXX TABLES AND FIGURES 1 (VIII) Correlations of the E and F Scales with Various Ability Tests (Maritime School Men) 282 2 (VIII) Correlations of the E, F, and PEC Scales with the Otis Higher Form A Intelligence Test (Employment Service Veteran Men) 283 3 (VIII) Mean Wechsler-Bellevue IQ Score for Each Quartile of the Ethnocentrism Scale (Psychiatric Clinic Men and Women) 283 4 (VIII) Mean Number of Years of Education for Each Quartile of the Ethnocentrism Scale (Psychiatric Clinic Men and Women) 285 5 (VIII) Mean E Score for Groups Having Various Years of Education (Maritime School Men) 286 1 (IX) Survey of 20 Prejudiced and 20 Unprejudiced Men Interviewed 296 2 (IX) Survey of 25 Prejudiced and 15 Unprejudiced Women Interviewed 297 3 (IX) Representativeness of Interviewees in Terms of Scores on the Ethnocentrism Scale 298 4 (IX) Age Distribution in Total Extreme Quartiles and Interviewees 299 5 (IX) Religious Affiliation in Total Extreme Quartiles and Interviewees 299 6 (IX) Political Outlook in Total Extreme Quartiles and Interviewees 300 7 (IX) Reliability of Interview Ratings: Interrater Agreement on Nine Subjects 330 8 (IX) Interrater Agreement on Interview Ratings for Six Major Areas 332 1 (X) Interview Ratings on Attitude Toward Parents and Concept of Family for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or 2 (X) "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 341 Interview Ratings on Concept of Childhood Environment for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the 3 (X) Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 362 Interview Ratings on Childhood Events and Attitude Toward Siblings for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 379 1 (XI) Interview Ratings on Attitude Toward Sex for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 392
XXX1 2 (XI) Interview Ratings on Attitude Toward People for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 407 3 (XI) Interview Ratings on Attitude Toward Present Self for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 424 4 (XI) Interview Ratings on Attitude Toward Childhood Self for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 436 1 (XII) Interview Ratings on Dynamic Character Structure for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 446 2 (XII) Interview Ratings on Cognitive Personality Organization for 80 Subjects Scoring Extremely "High" or "Low" on the Ethnic Prejudice Questionnaire Scale 462 1 (XIII) Composite Ratings (Means) for Major Areas of Study for "High" and "Low" Scoring Groups of Interviewees 469 1 (XIV) Distribution of Thematic Apperception Test Sample Among the Several Groups Participating in the Study 491 2 (XIV) Age Distribution of Subjects Receiving the Thematic Ap perception Test 492 3 (XIV) Distribution of Thematic Apperception Test Subjects with Respect to the Sex of the Examiners 492 4 (XIV) Stimulus Values of the Ten Thematic Apperception Test Pictures 5 (XIV)A Intensities of Need and Press Variables as Expressed in 494 Stories Told by Men 500 5 (XIV) B Intensities of Need and Press Variables as Expressed in Stories Told by Women 502 6 (XIV) Comparison of the Scores of Mack and Larry on the Thematic Apperception Test with the Mean Scores of Prejudiced and Unprejudiced Men 539 1 (XV) Scoring Reliability (Percentage Interrater Agreement) for the Eight Proj ective Questions 583 2 (XV) Percentage Agreement Between Proj ective Question Scores and E-Scale Scores 586 FIGURE 1 (XX) The Genetic Aspects of Mack's Personality 8or
Xxxii TABLES ANT) FIGURES 1 (XXI) Identifying Data for Interviewees in the Prison Inmates 820 Group 2 (XXI) Results on the E Scale from the Group of Prison Inmates 823 3 (XXI) Results on the PEG Scale from the Group of Prison Inmates 836 4 (XXI) Results on the F Scale from the Group of Prison Inmates 846 5 (XXI) Mean F- and F-Scale Scores of the Prison Inmates, Grouped According to Offense 889 1 (XXII) Reliability Data on the E Scale for Psychiatric Clinic Men 897 and Women 2 (XXII) Incidence of Various Psychiatic Diagnoses in the Sample of Psychiatric Clinic Patients 899 3 (XXII) Percentage of Each F-Scale Quartile Falling into Various 901 Psychiatric Categories 4 (XXII) Percentage of the Upper and of the Lower Halves of the E-Scale Distribution Falling Into Various Psychiatric 902 Categories 5 (XXII) Percentage of Neurotic Patients in Each F-Scale Quartile Showing Various Neurotic Features 903 6 (XXII) Percentage of Neurotic Patients in the Upper and Lower Halves of the F-Scale Distribution Showing Various Neurotic Features 904 FIGURE 1 (XXII) Average MMPI Profile for Non-Psychotic Psychiatric Patients Falling Into Each Half of the E-Scale Distribution 7 (XXII) Mean Scores on the Several Scales of the MMPI for Subects Falling into Each Quartile and Into Each Half of the E-Scale Distribution. Nonpsychotic Male Patients 914 8 (XXII) Mean Scores on the Several Scales of the MMPI for Subects Falling Into Each Quartile and Into Each Half of the E-Scale Distribution. Nonpsychotic Female Patients 915 9 (XXII) The Amount of Agreement Between Two Raters in Estimating a Subject's Standing on the F Scale from an Analysis of His Intake Interview. Psychiatric Clinic Patients: 927 Men and Women Combined 10 (XXII) The Amount of Agreement Between a Single Rater (A) and Seven Other Raters in Estimating Variables in Intake Interviews. Psychiatric Clinic Patients: Men and Women 930 Combined 11 (XXII) The Amount of Agreement Between Rater A's Estimate of High or Low Ethnocentrism, Based on Analysis of Intake Interviews, and Ethnocentrism as Measured by the
XXX111 E Scale. Psychiatric Clinic Patients: i'ien and Women 12 (XXII) Combined 933 The Amount of Agreement Between Estimates of Ethnocentrism, Based on Ratings of Single Variables from Intake Interviews, and Ethnocentrism as Measured by the E Scale. Psychiatric Clinic Patients: Men and Women Combined 934 13 (XXII) Summary of Data from the Rating of Intake Interviews A. Reliability: Percentage Agreement Among Raters for Seven Variables. B. Validity: Percentage Agreement Between Ratings and Score on the E Scale. Psychiatric Clinic Patients: Men and Women Combined 936