YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH STEMLESS ARTHROPLASTY. Disclosures INDICATIONS FOR STEMMLES TSA

Similar documents
Balgrist Shoulder Course 2017

Biomechanical concepts of total shoulder replacement. «Shoulder Course» Day 1. Richard W. Nyffeler Orthopädie Sonnenhof Bern. 11. Sept.

Management of Glenoid and Humeral Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability

Convertibilité. Ph. Valenti. Paris Shoulder Unit Clinique Bizet (Paris, France)

Surface Replacement for the Active Patient with GH DJD. Disclosures. Popularized by Copeland 3/1/2018

What s New in the Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures?

Shoulder Revisions: Why Are We Here?

Les séquelles traumatiques. Ph. Valenti, J. Kany, D. Katz

ANATOMIC TOTAL SHOULDER REPLACEMENT:

Should We Really be Performing HHR for Proximal Humeral Fractures Anymore?

Conflicts of Interest Consulting (C), Royalty (R)

Are too many reverse TSAs being done? Problems it is causing

Jonathan C. Levy, MD

Disclosures A prospective comparison between reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty

Advantages to medialize less

Integra. Titan Modular Shoulder System, 2.5

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A New Frontier (of Complications)

Shoulder Joint Replacement

D Degenerative joint disease, rotator cuff deficiency with, 149 Deltopectoral approach component removal with, 128

Conversion of Anatomic TSA to RSA

Making sense of all our measures-inclination, version, subluxation, reaming depth & implant seating

Proximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR. Proximal Humeral Fractures RSA v HHR. Introduction

Shoulder DJD in Athletic patient. What is Athletic? McCarty University of Colorado Fall Sports Medicine Symposium. Oct. 3, 2008

Zimmer Patient Specific Instruments (PSI) for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty

Management of arthritis of the shoulder. Omar Haddo Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeon

Radial Head Fractures Save or Replace?

Not relevant to this presentation.

Current Controversies in Shoulder Surgery:

Shoulder and Elbow ORTHOPAEDIC SYPMPOSIUM APRIL 8, 2017 DANIEL DOTY MD

I have no relevant disclosures pertaining to this talk.

Fracture complexe ESH Que choisir? Hémi ou Inversée Ph Valenti Paris

Name of Policy: Shoulder Resurfacing

Index. B Backslap technique depth assessment, 82, 83 diaphysis distal trocar, 82 83

Shoulder Arthroplasty

Revision of the humeral component for aseptic loosening in arthroplasty of the shoulder

2nd madrid. shoulder course. msc. MADRID - October 18-19, Chairmen: Samuel Antuña Emilio Calvo Fernando Marco

ISSUES FROM AN ORTHOPEDIC PERSPECTIVE

Charles S. Neer, 1955

Common Shoulder Problems and Treatment Options. Benjamin W. Szerlip D.O. Austin Shoulder Institute

2nd madrid. shoulder course. msc. MADRID - October 18-19, Chairmen: Samuel Antuña Emilio Calvo Fernando Marco

S h o u l d e r Solutions by Tornier C o n v e r T i b l e S h o u l d e r S y S T e m

Reversed Indications the most extensive portfolio on the market

Age-Related Outcomes in Stemless TSA

Proximal Humerus Fractures

Augmented Glenoid Component for Bone Deficiency in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Developments in Shoulder Arthroplasty

Anatomic stemless shoulder arthroplasty and related outcomes: a systematic review

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Protocol Shawn Hennigan, MD

Elbow Fractures ORIF VS Arthroplasty

"Stability and Instability of RTSA"

Late Results of Total Shoulder Replacement in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

Proximal Humerus Fractures: contemporary perspectives

Introduction. Disclosure. Biomet-Royalties. Infection after Shoulder Arthroplasty. Infection. John W. Sperling MD, MBA

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Protocol

Balgrist Shoulder Course 2017

Proximal Humeral Fractures: Why My Practice Has Changed

Reverse Total Shoulder. Dr. Minoo Patel

2nd madrid. shoulder course. msc. MADRID - October 18-20, Chairmen: Samuel Antuña Emilio Calvo Fernando Marco

RADIOGRAPHY OF THE ELBOW & HUMERUS

Total Elbow Arthroplasty: an Update

TORNIER AEQUALIS FX. Shoulder System SYSTEM OVERVIEW

Operations included in the National Joint Registry (NJR)


Results of a new stemless shoulder prosthesis: Radiologic proof of maintained fixation and stability after a minimum of three years follow-up

REVERSE SHOULDER REPLACEMENT

No Financial Disclosures

WHAT YOU IS BACK WITHIN ARM S REACH

University of Cape Town

Early To Medium Term Results of the Anatomical Total Shoulder Replacement

2nd madrid. shoulder course. msc. MADRID - October 18-19, Chairmen: Samuel Antuña Emilio Calvo Fernando Marco

Shoulder Arthroplasty. Valentin Lance 3/24/16

SSSR. 1. Nov Shoulder Prosthesis. Postoperative Imaging. Florian M. Buck, MD

Options for the Irreparable RCT 3/9/2018. Your Patient has an Irreparable RC Tear: What Now? Asheesh Bedi, MD

Fractures of the shoulder girdle, elbow and fractures of the humerus. H. Sithebe 2012

continued TABLE E-1 Potential Predictors of Short-Term Complications and Reoperations* Comparison Group OR 95% CI P Value

PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE TSHT 2017

Secret shoulder secrets Dominik Meyer

Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty with Latissimus dorsi tendon transfer Protocol:

Posterior Glenoid Wear in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty:

Optimizing function Maximizing survivorship Accelerating recovery

DESIGN RATIONALE AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE

Which Fractures Require Internal Fixation?

Stemless shoulder prosthesis versus conventional anatomic shoulder prosthesis in patients with osteoarthritis

Fixed and Variable Geometry Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

Thursday, February 1, 2018

This surgical technique describes how to perform an anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty implanting a short stem.

Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fracture

Clinico-radiological outcome of closed reduction and percutaneous fixation of proximal humerus fractures

S H O U L D E R Solutions by Tornier. Aequalistm. Pyrocarbon Humeral Head. surgical technique

Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are the third most

Jon JP Warner, MD Chief, MGH Shoulder Service Chair, Q&S Committee, MGOA Professor of Orthopedic Surgery

Positioning Sleeve Surgical Technique

Disclosure. General. Total Shoulder Arthroplasty : Results, Outcomes and Expectations 2/8/2016. Consultant for Tornier/Wright, DJO, and Conventus

Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Optimizing Outcomes and Avoiding Complications

MEDICAL POLICY MEDICAL POLICY DETAILS POLICY STATEMENT. Page: 1 of 6

Bone Bangalore

Optimum implant geometry

Reverse Total Shoulder Protocol

Transcription:

5-10 YEAR EXPERIENCE WITH STEMLESS ARTHROPLASTY PETER HABERMEYER DEUTSCHES SCHULTERZENTRUM MUNICH Germany Disclosures Consultant for Arthrex Inc. Royalties Arthrex Inc. INDICATIONS FOR STEMMLES TSA 1. POSTTRAUMATIC OSTEOARTHRITIS 2. IDIOPATHIC OSTEOARTHRITIS 3. DISLOCATION ARTHROPATHY 4. AVASCULAR OSTEONECROSIS 5. RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ( CENTERED FORM ) 1

CONTRA - INDICATIONS FOR STEMMLES TSA 1. OSTEOPOROSIS ( T SCORE < - 2.5 SD ) CONTRA - INDICATIONS FOR STEMMLES TSA 1. OSTEOPOROSIS ( T SCORE < - 2.5 SD ) 2. BONE CYST FORMATION ( RA ) 3. EPILEPSY HUMERAL HEAD GEOMETRY & BIOMECHANICS OF STEMLESS HEAD REPLACEMENT Design principle: Primary stability by shifting & fixation of the trunion to the center of rotation 2

DESIGN RATIONAL OF STEMLESS IMPLANTS metaphyseal epiphyseal metaphyseal metaphyseal 04: TESS (Biomet) 05: Eclipse (Arthrex) 10: Simpliciti (Tornier) EPIPHYSEAL & METAPHYSEAL FIXATION TO PREVENT MIGRATION FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS ECLIPSE CRANIAL LOADING: Reduction of migration to 0.2mm with cortical support of the trunion MIDTERM RESULTS OF STEMLESS SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY Evaluation of clinical and radiological results with 5-8 years after stemless humeral head replacement 3

AIM OF THE STUDY Evaluation of clinical and radiological results with 9 & 10 years after stemless humeral head replacement OWN RESULTS WITH A FUP OF 9 & 10 YEAR N = 49 (27f / 22m) Ø FU: 9 years (90-127 Mo) Ø Age 56 years (21-81y) 32 HSA (65%) / 17 TSA (35%) Lost of FUP n=6, FUP rate: 88% Follow-up: 6 Wo, 3 Mo, 6 Mo, 12 Mo, annually Constant Score X-ray in 3 planes INDICATIONS No of patients 25 15 10 5 0 24 7 primary OA Posttraumatic Instability 7 2 1 2 CTA Postinfectious Arthritis Revision arthroplasty 4

CONSTANT-SCORE pre-op / post-op TOTAL FU 9 years, age 56y, n=43 P P<0.0001 80 79 Pre-OP 70 P<0.0001 Post-OP 60 62 50 52 40 42 P=0.001 30 P<0.0001 P=0.008 P=0.67 24 17 10 8 12 9 13 7 8 0 rel. CS (%) CS Pain ADL ROM Strength Significant improvement of overall Constant Score, pain, ADL & ROM P 80 70 60 50 40 30 10 0 79 79 62 63 rel. CS (%) CONSTANT-SCORE POST-OP HSA vs TSA P > 0,05 12 13 12 15 HSA TSA 24 23 10 6 CS Pain ADL ROM Strength No difference in Constant score and its subcategories ROM POST-OP HSA vs TSA P 1 100 80 60 40 0 P > 0.05 118 119 106 103 HSA TSA 43 42 active flexion active abduction active external rotation No difference in active ROM 5

RESULTS POSTTRAUMATIC AVN N=24 (14f/10m) Ø age 57 years (37-81y) Ø Follow-up 108 Mo (90-127 Mo) chron. fracture Boileau I 15 HSA 5 TSA P 80 70 60 50 CONSTANT-SCORE POSTTRAUMATIC pre- / post-op P=0.001 77 FU 109 Mo, age 57y, n=24 P=0.001 60 Pre-OP Post-OP 40 48 38 P=0.014 30 P=0.002 P=0.05 21 P=0.9 10 8 12 8 12 16 7 8 0 rel. CS (%) CS Pain ADL ROM Strength Significant improvement of overall Constant Score, pain, ADL & ROM ROM POSTTRAUMATIC pre- / post-op P 1 100 80 60 40 0 89 FU 109 Mo, age 57y, n=24 P=0.031 106 P=0.013 66 8 active flexion active abduction active external rotation 92 Pre-OP Post-OP P<0,0001 Significant improvement of flexion, abduction, ext. rotation 35 6

ASSESSMENT OF RLL & STRESS SHIELDING b a c a b c ASSESSMENT OF HUMERAL HEAD MIGRATION Fleischer Gerhard 2 mo post-op 1 year post-op 3 years post-op 9 years post-op RC-DEFICIENCY = Migration & loss of shoulder function RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS HUMERUS Incomplete RLL < 1mm 2.9% Loosening 0% Resorption of greater tub. 1 case Stress shielding zone A 29.4% ap Humeral head migration 14.7% 7

RADIOLOGICAL RESULTS GLENOID SIDE HSA: glenoid wear after HSA: 1 (2,3%) Revision to TSA TSA: incomplete RLL < 1mm 27.3% No loosening 06 16 1 (2.3%) Late infection Explantation 7 mo post-op 6 (14%) RC deficiency COMPLICATIONS HUMERERAL SIDE 1x Pect. major transfer 6 weeks post-op 1x Reverse shoulder arthroplasty 74 mo post-op 1 (2.3%) greater tuberosity resorption without revision 1 (2.3%) proximal humeral fracture at the surgical neck by a fall 7 weeks post-op conservative treatment 9.3% revisions on humeral side POSTTRAUMATIC AVN 79 years, female Abduction 70 Flexion 50 ER -10 Severe pain 8 years after injury 8

POSTTRAUMATIC AVN Abduction 90 Flexion 100 IR L1 ER 30 Pain 14/15 1 year post-op CHRONICH LOCKED POSTERIOR FRACTURE DISLOCATION & AVN M.M., 81y CHRONICH LOCKED POSTERIOR FRACTURE DISLOCATION & AVN 6 Mo post-op ROM: Flexion 110 ERO 30 Constant Score 42 points (65,6%) M.M., 81y 9

DISCUSSION: CONVERTIBLE VS REVERSIBLE PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE CONCLUSION 12/05 04/06 Good functional results after 9-10 years Excellent results in posttraumatic cases No revision due to loosening Stress Shielding - within the area of physiologic lower bone substance Good reversibility Easy revision in periprosthetic fracture 10

Llength of time of surgery 08.02.16 THANK YOU FOR YOUR KIND ATTENTION! WHAT IS BETTER? HABERMEYER ET AL.16 TYPE STEMLESS TSA Uncemented Stem Prosthesis TSA Indication N Follow-up Rate Ø FU (min 60) [months] Primary OA (10f/10m) 70% Primary OA (13f/7m) 85% 68 70 Ø Age 65 69 PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY : SHAFT VS STEMMLESS ADVANTAGES STEMMLESS HHR Length of time of Surgery Min P=0,032 Matched pair analysis 117 97 Significant reduction of length of surgery ( Min) using the stemless implant > 17% Type of prosthesis Habermeyer P et al. DVSE 09 11

STEMMED vs STEMLESS TSA FUNCTIONAL RESULTS 80 70 60 50 40 30 10 0 P>0.05 70 73 Constant Score (P) P>0.05 12 13 P>0.05 16 16 P>0.05 Stemmed Stemless 29 33 11 8 P>0.05 Pain ADL ROM Strength STEMMED vs STEMLESS TSA Assessment of RLL b a a b c C b a c C a b Habermeyer P 10 STEMMED vs STEMLESS TSA Radiological Results Stemless TSA Stemmed TSA Stress shielding 26,7% 47,1% RLL humeral Component 0 0 No implant related Complications 12

DISCUSSION: COMPLICATIONS STANDARD STEM vs ECLIPSE COMPLICATIONS Stemmed Implants (Denard PJ JSES 13, Young AA JBJS Am 12, Raiss P JBJS Am 14) Eclipse RC-defects up to 16.8% 14% Loosening of the humeral component Complication rate (without glenoid & without RCT) 0% - 2% 0% 8% 7% CASE PRESENTATIONS POSTTRAUMTIC AVN 3 years after ORIF F. A., 50 y 1 year post-op 5 years post-op 7 years post-op 13

POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHRITIS / AVN & RC at Risk G.S., 46 y POSTTRAUMATIC ARTHRITIS / AVN & RC at Risk Eclipse & convertible glenoid G.S., 46 y Revision to RSA REVISION TO RSA Failed Hemiarthroplasty by RC Defect 14

IDIOPATHIC AVN ST. III F. H., 56 J 1 year post-op 2 years post-op 5 years post-op POSTINFECTIOUS ARTHRITIS J. M., 58 y 2 years post-op 3 years post-op 8 years post-op 15