Appendage Closure. Jason Rogers, MD. Director, Interventional Cardiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

Similar documents
Occlusion de l'auricule gauche: Niche ou réel avenir? D Gras, MD, Nantes, France

Watchman. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device. Uniquely engineered for the LAA 1-3 with proven safety and longterm efficacy. 4-8

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion

Devices to Protect Against Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation

Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the Era of Novel Anticoagulants

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Rationale

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Techniques: 2015

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Moving Beyond Blood Thinners to Prevent Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation October 29, 2016

PERCUTANEOUS STRUCTURAL UPDATES TAVR WATCHMAN(LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUDERS) MITRACLIP PARAVALVULAR LEAK REPAIRS ASD/PFO CLOSURES VALVULOPLASTIES

Update in Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: More Options

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Gauging stroke risk across the AF spectrum and selecting the appropriate patient for LAA closure. Miguel Valderrábano, MD

Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Atrial Fibrillation 10/11/2017

Patients selection criteria for LAA occlusion. Young Keun On, MD, PhD, FHRS Samsung Medical Center Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine

Left Atrial Appendage Closure in SCRIPPS CLINIC

Left Atrial Appendage Closure 4 questions Who? When? How? Results?

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Shutting Out Embolic Disease Without Anticoagulation

Trick or Treat 2: A New Era of Stroke Prevention in AF? WATCHMAN and LARIAT?

Cryptogenic Stroke: A logical approach to a common clinical problem

Watchman a Stroke Prevention Technology for Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

William A. Gray MD System Chief of Cardiovascular Services, Main Line Health President, Lankenau Heart Institute Wynnewood, Pennsylvania USA

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Atrial Fibrillation 2015 UPDATE

Left Atrial Appendage Closure for Stroke Prevention in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Modern management of atrial fibrillation, from blood pressure control to anticoagulation

Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Valid Option to Anticoagulation for Long-term Prevention of Stroke Saibal Kar, MD

Percutaneous Epicardial LAA Closure: When Does it Make Sense?

Role of cardiac imaging for catheterbased left atrial appendage closure

Page 1. Current Trends in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion. Atrial fibrillation: Scope of the problem

Live in a Box: Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device

WATCHMAN: Where do we stand

LAA Occluders: The Right Device for the Right Patient ACC/SHA MEETING OCTOBER 31 ST 2015 JEDDAH, KSA OMER A. M. ELAMIN, MD, FACC

Left atrial appendage occlusion

Percutane structurele interventies. Hartoor sluiting (Watchman )

Updates in Atrial Fibrillation

NCVH Birmingham 2013 August 24, Michael S. Bailey, MD Birmingham Heart Clinic

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Neurological events

Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Anti-thromboticthrombotic drugs

Role of Imaging in Complex LAA Closure Anatomies

TREATMENT OF STROKE PATIENTS THAT ARE TAKING NOVEL ANTICOAGULANTS. Jesse Weinberger, MD The Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Atrial Fibrillation: Risk Stratification and Treatment New Cardiovascular Horizons St. Louis September 19, 2015

CARDIOLOGY GRAND ROUNDS

Devices for Stroke Prevention. Douglas Ebersole, MD Interventional Cardiology Watson Clinic LLP

Update in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices. Faisal Al-Samadi MBBS, FRCPC, FACP, FACC, FSCAI, FHRS

Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Techniques and Guidelines. Mohammad Shenasa, MD Heart & Rhythm Medical Group San Jose, CA

THINK OUTSIDE THE PILLBOX

Managing the Left Atrial Appendage: Concepts & Controversies

Atrial fibrillation (AF), one of the

Left atrial appendage closure for thromboembolism prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: advances and perspectives

PREVAIL: 5-Year Outcomes From a Randomized Trial of Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Medical Therapy in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation

EP Clinical Research Program Summary. Daniel L Lustgarten MD PhD Associate Professor The University of Vermont School of Medicine

Medical Policy Manual. Topic: Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation. Date of Origin: December 2011

Atrial fibrillation (AF) affects approximately 33 million

Manuel Castellá Cardiovascular Surgery Hospital Clínic, Universidad de

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: PERCUTANEOUS LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE DEVICES EFFECTIVE DATE: 08/20/15 REVISED DATE: 10/20/16, 11/16/17

Endocardial LAA Occlusion: Which Device for Which Patient?

Atrial Fibrillation. Atrial Fibrillation

Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

ICE 2012 Ioannina,

Rate or Rhythm Control? Epidemiology. Relevant Advances in Atrial Fibrillation 6/20/2011. Stroke Prophylaxis

Percutaneous Left Atrial appendage occlusion and anticoagulation therapy Nicolas Lellouche, MD, PhD

NEW APPROACHES AND NEW ANTICOAGULANTS FOR ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

Show Me the Outcomes!

Update in the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common

Technology Assessment Report No. 302

Intracardiac Devices for Stroke Prevention: The Heart Brain Team

Relevant Advances in Atrial Fibrillation

Continuing Cardiology Education

Medical Policy An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association

LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE INSTEAD OF ANTICOAGULATION; INDICATIONS AND OUTCOMES. Sheetal Chandhok, MD

Disappearing LAA Thrombus Resulting in Stroke Parekh A, Parekh Ezekowitz M et al: Circ 1 Ezekowitz 14:e513, 2006 M et al: Circ 1

Case Report Hemostasis of Left Atrial Appendage Bleed With Lariat Device

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Section Medicine

Disclosures 6/16/2015. Preventing Stroke in Atrial Fibrillation Warfarin Intolerance / Non-Compliance

Atrial fibrillation and advanced age

MEDICAL POLICY MEDICAL POLICY DETAILS POLICY STATEMENT POLICY GUIDELINES DESCRIPTION. Page: 1 of 9

Clinical Data Summary & Discussion Of the Ultraseal Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Closure Device

Watchman Implantation Case Presentation and Discussion

MODULE 1: Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Benjamin Bell, MD, FRCPC

Is there a role for transcatheter left atrial appendage occlusion?

Abstract 1 INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL ARTICLE

[N] = No product variation, policy applies as stated [Y] = Standard product coverage varies from application of this policy, see below

Safety and efficacy results in the EWOLUTION all-comers LAA closure study: DAPT subgroup

Dad needed to get off his blood thinner. His doctor told us about an alternative. It s called

Combined catheter ablation and left atrial appendage closure as a. treatment of atrial fibrillation

Percutaneous Left-Atrial Appendage Closure Devices for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial Fibrillaiton and Heart Failure: Anticoagulation therapy in all cases?

SHARED DECISION MAKING: AN EVIDENCE-BASED CORNERSTONE OF LAAC THERAPY

Exclusion de l auricule gauche par voie percutanée

Updates in Stroke Management. Jessica A Starr, PharmD, FCCP, BCPS Associate Clinical Professor Auburn University Harrison School of Pharmacy

ATRIAL SEPTAL CLOSURE AND LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION: INDICATIONS AND GUIDANCE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

La chiusura dell auricola per la prevenzione dello stroke nel paziente con FA

Left atrium appendage closure: A new technique for patients at high hemorrhagic risk

Antithrombotic Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran Etexilate

ESC Congress 2012, Munich

Review Article Thromboembolism Prevention via Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure with Transeosophageal Echocardiography Guidance

Transcription:

Appendage Closure Jason Rogers, MD Director, Interventional Cardiology UC Davis Medical Center Sacramento, California

Left Atrium: Atrial Fibrillation Left Atrial Appendage Left Atrium

Incidence of Atrial Fibrillation Increases with Age Adapted from Feinberg WM. Arch Intern Med. 1995;155:469-43

Left Atrial Appendage

Courtesy Mark Reisman MD

Cardioembolic Stroke

>90% of strokes in AF are caused by LAA Thrombi Thrombus in the LAA 1 Blackshear JL. Odell JA., Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 1996;61:755-759

Major Bleeding Rates With Newer Anticoagulants Study Treatment Major Bleeding Hemorrhagic Stroke Dabigatran (110 mg) 2.71% 0.12% RE-LY 1 Dabigatran (150 mg) 3.11% 0.10% Warfarin 3.36% 0.38% ROCKET-AF 2 Rivaroxaban 3.6% 0.5% Warfarin 3.4% 0.7% ARISTOTLE 3 Apixaban 2.13% 0.24% Warfarin 3.09% 0.47% 1. Connelly SJ et al, NEJM 2009;361:1139-51 2. Patel MR et al, NEJM 2011;365:883-91 3. Granger J. et al, NEJM 2011;365:981-92

Percutaneous LAA Occlusion Devices Watchman Cardiac Plug LARIAT

WATCHMAN Device Anchors 160 Micron Membrane Nitinol Frame Radially expands to maintain position in LAA Available sizes: 21, 24, 27, 30, 33 mm (diameter) 10 Active fixation anchors around device perimeter engage LAA tissue for stability and retention Contour shape accommodates most LAA anatomies 160 Micron Membrane Polyethyl terephthalate (PET) cap Blocks emboli from exiting the LAA Promotes healing process

Case 71 year old Chronic atrial fibrillation h/o lung cancer Recurrent nosebleeds CHADS 2 = 3 CHA 2 DS 2 Vasc = 5

Pre Post

PROTECT AF Trial 707 coumadin-eligible patients (CHADS2 1) randomized 2:1 device vs. warfarin Efficacy: CVA, CV Death, Systemic Embolism Safety: Bleeding, Procedure Complications Holmes DR et al. Lancet.2009;374:534 42

PROTECT-AF: Patient Demographics Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT-AF: Patient Demographics Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT-AF: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT-AF: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT-AF: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT-AF: Primary Efficacy Endpoint Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

Intention-to-Treat: All-Cause Mortality Hazard Ratio with Watchman, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.45 0.98) P = 0.0379 Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

PROTECT AF: Primary Safety Endpoint Adapted from HRS LBCT 2013 by Dr. Vivek Reddy SH-158101-AB- MAY 2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

Pericardial Effusions Requiring Intervention % of Patients 4.0% 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 1.6% n=7 p = 0.027 P = 0.318 0.2% n=1 0.4% n=1 Cardiac perforation requiring surgical repair 2.4% PROTECT AF CAP PREVAIL 1.2% 1.5% n=11 n=7 n=4 Pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis or window Adapted from a presentation by David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. SH-146002-AA MAR2013 PROTECT-AF and CAP data from Reddy VY et al. Circulation. 2011;123:417-424 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

Stroke and Device Embolization % of Patients % of Patients 3.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% 2.0% 1.0% 0.0% *1 additional device embolization was reported at 45 days PROTECT-AF and CAP data from Reddy VY et al. Circulation. 2011;123:417-424 1.1% n=5 0.0% 0.4% n=0 n=1 Procedure/Device Related Strokes PROTECT AF CAP PREVAIL 0.4% 0.2% 0.8% n=2* n=1 n=2 Device Embolizations PROTECT AF CAP PREVAIL p = 0.007 p = 0.364 Procedure related strokes were reduced Device embolizations remained low Adapted from a presentation by David R. Holmes, Jr., M.D. SH-146002-AA MAR2013 Caution: In the United States, WATCHMAN is an investigational device limited by Federal law and investigational use only. Not for sale in the US. Prior to use please review device indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, adverse events, and operational instructions. Only available according to applicable local law. CE Mark received in 2005

LARIAT LAA Closure Coumadin Ineligible Subjects

Case 81 year old Chronic atrial fibrillation h/o UGI Bleed HASBLED=9.1% yearly risk of bleeding CHADS 2 =4 CHA 2 DS 2 Vasc=6

LAA Baseline

LA Appendage Appearance Baseline 6 week Follow Up

Lariat PLACE Study Permanent Ligation Approximation Closure and Exclusion Single center, non-randomized study 85 patients underwent closure of their left atrial appendage Follow up was 1 day, 30 days, 90 days and 1 year with transesophageal echocardiography Intent-to-Treat 85/89 (96%) Adverse Events (defined as access related or device failure) Closure (defined as < 1mm residual flow) 3/89 (3.3%)** Access 3/89 (3.3%) Device 0/89 (0.0%) 1 day 81/85 (95%) 30 day 81/85 (95%) 90 day 77/81 (95%) 1 year 65/66 (98%) * Bartus, Krzysztof, et al. Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Suture Ligation Using the LARIAT in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Initial Clinical Experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. ** All non-serious: 2 pericardial access related. 1 transseptal access related.

Thank You