Delegations will find in annex the draft Council conclusions on the above-mentioned subject, as endorsed at the HDG meeting on 1 March 2018.

Similar documents
16693/12 JV/sl 1 DG D 2C

15050/15 JS/pm 1 DGB 3B

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 7 July /04 CORDROGUE 59

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 6 December /02 CORDROGUE 103

15638/17 MMA/vdh 1 DGD 1C

3135th JUSTICE and HOME AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 13 and 14 December 2011

Drug laws, penalties and alternatives across Europe

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 30 June /04 CORDROGUE 53

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Information for follow-up purposes. Head of International Drug Policy, Home Office

2767th EMPLOYMENT, SOCIAL POLICY, HEALTH AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS Council meeting Brussels, 30 November and 1 December 2006

European Union Drugs Strategy

ANNEX AU PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUG CONTROL AND CRIME PREVENTION (AUPA) ( ) IMPLEMENTATION MATRIX

HEMISPHERIC PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUGS

Requirements of the International Drug Control Conventions, Catherine Muganga Legal Officer, UNODC Feb 2015

QUESTIONNAIRE. Submission Information. Information for follow-up purposes. Publishing on the UNODC website

Drug Policy Developments

15074/04 JV/nt 1 DGH II

OICS INCB. Vienna, 7 November Fostering a united approach to the effective implementation of the three international drug control conventions

Statement by the Portuguese Deputy Minister for Health. Vienna, 8 March 2010

Informal meeting of the Justice and Home Affairs Ministers Sopot July 2011

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 8 May /07 SAN 89. NOTE from : Permanent Representatives Committee

Madam Chair, Your Royal Highness, Excellencies, ladies and gentlemen,

9668/15 JV/PN/np 1 DGD2C

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR. Strategic Intent YEAR PLAN

6078/16 LB/dk 1 DGD 1C

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

European Legal Database on Drugs

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC)

14414/15 AF/evt 1 DG G 3 C

1. The Working Party on Public Health discussed and agreed the draft Council conclusions as set out in the Annex.

Council of the European Union Brussels, 28 October 2015 (OR. en)

REVISED ELEMENTS - PROPOSED BY THE UNGASS BOARD TO THE CND FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION - STATUS 4 November 2015

HEMISPHERIC PLAN OF ACTION ON DRUGS,

DRAFT OUTCOME DOCUMENT (14 JANUARY 2016) UNGASS

Public health dimension of the world drug problem

Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME

COUNCIL. Official Journal of the European Union. (Information) EU Drugs Action Plan ( ) (2005/C 168/01) Introduction

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) EVALUATOR S MANUAL

Addis Ababa, ETHIOPIA P. O. Box 3243 Telephone Cables: OAU, ADDIS ABABA

TEXTS ADOPTED Provisional edition

Expert consultation on the improvement of drug statistics and to strengthen the Annual Report Questionnaire (ARQ) UNODC Concept Note

BEYOND 2008 DECLARATION

On 24 May 2005 the Council (GAERC), in its formation of Development Ministers, adopted the conclusions in Annex I.

15571/17 YML/ik 1 DG C 1

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

Pompidou Group Work Programme Drug policy and human rights: new trends in a globalised context

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION

Horizontal Working Party on Drugs EMCDDA contribution towards a methodological framework for monitoring drugs and prison in Europe

Expert consultation on improving drug statistics and strengthening the Annual Report Questionnaire (ARQ)

Identifying Common Ground on Public Health for UNGASS 2016:

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 26 November /2/99 REV 2 LIMITE CORDROGUE 64. NOTE from : Horizontal Drugs Group

12883/16 PR/mk 1 DG B 1C

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

I. INSTITUTIONAL BUILDING / NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

The criminalisation of narcotic drug misuse an evaluation of criminal justice system measures

João Goulão, MD. EVIDENCE-BASED POLICIES 21 April April João Goulão

Economic and Social Council

Memorandum of Understanding on the working relations between the European Commission and the European Stability Mechanism

I. INSTITUTIONAL STRENGTHENING/NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY

HIV AND PEOPLE WHO INJECT DRUGS

Third Ministerial Conference of the Paris Pact Partners on Combating Illicit Traffic in Opiates Originating in Afghanistan. (Vienna, 16 February 2012)

Changes in Attitudes to Drug Diversion Initiatives

Barbados. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

UNODC/HONLAF/26/CRP.2

Delegations will find attached document D042445/02.

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Council of the European Union Brussels, 27 March 2017 (OR. en)

Decriminalization of Personal Use of Psychoactive Substances

Trinidad and Tobago ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) INTER-AMERICAN DRUG ABUSE CONTROL COMMISSION (CICAD)

Haiti. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

Integrated Drug Policy in Portugal

NATIONAL ANTI-DRUG STRATEGY for the Period English version. translated by EURO-VKM Bratislava

Uruguayan Position before UNGASS 2016: Strategic axes for a comprehensive approach to drug policy

Economic and Social Council

Summary. 1 Scale of drug-related crime

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION

E/2001/23 E/CN.4/2001/167. COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT ON THE FIFTY-SEVENTH SESSION (19 March - 27 April 2001) ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL

Council of the European Union Brussels, 30 January 2018 (OR. en) Mr Jeppe TRANHOLM-MIKKELSEN, Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union

COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 November /04 DEVGEN 239 RELEX 575 SAN 190

Averett University. Alcohol and Other Drugs Biennial Review. Fall 2015

Nicaragua. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Mr Jordi AYET PUIGARNAU, Director

Integrating and strengthening the European research area *

Strengthening Continuity of Care: New Zealand s Alcohol and Other Drug (AOD) Aftercare Worker Pilot

THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA NATIONAL STRATEGY ON COMBATING DRUG ABUSE IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FOR THE PERIOD

Drug and Alcohol Abuse/Prevention Policy and Program

COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL. Towards a stronger European response to drugs

OICS INCB. Statement by Dr. Viroj Sumyai, President, International Narcotics Control Board (INCB)

Statement of Claim (Administrative Suit)

Act on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Precursors thereof

Organization of American States OAS Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission CICAD. Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism MEM.

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION. of

Chile. Evaluation Report on Drug Control ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES (OAS) MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM)

SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to the

Transcription:

Council of the European Union Brussels, 1 March 2018 (OR. en) 6441/18 CORDROGUE 21 SAN 71 RELEX 185 NOTE From: To: Presidency Delegations No. prev. doc.: WK 13479/2017 REV 3 Subject: Draft Council conclusions on promoting the use of alternatives to coercive sanctions for drug using offenders Delegations will find in annex the draft Council conclusions on the above-mentioned subject, as endorsed at the HDG meeting on 1 March 2018. 6441/18 JV/mdc 1 DG D EN

Draft Council conclusions on promoting the use of alternatives to coercive sanctions for drug using offenders ANNEX The Council of the European Union and the Member States of the European Union, RECOGNISING that the use of illicit drugs and drug addiction is a public health concern requiring adequate and effective person-centred health and social response in order to enhance public health and public safety of individuals, families and communities across Europe; REITERATING the respect for human dignity, liberty, democracy, equality, solidarity, the rule of law and human rights as well as fundamental freedoms of every individual in the development and implementation of the European Union drug policy; RECALLING that the European Union aims to contribute to the reduction in drug demand and drug supply within the European Union through an integrated, balanced and evidence-based drug policy; HIGHLIGHTING that the three United Nations drug control conventions invite the States to provide, within national legal frameworks and in compliance with applicable international law, and where appropriate, as an alternative to conviction or punishment, measures of treatment, education, after-care, rehabilitation and social reintegration to drug users who have committed offences enumerated in these conventions; RECALLING that the high-level statements and resolutions of the United Nations emphasise a clear need for further action, including the necessity to identify and develop cost-effective and evidence-based alternative approaches and to consider in relevant cases a full implementation of such measures through collaboration and cooperation between law enforcement authorities, criminal justice, public health, social and education systems, and health and social service providers, as well as to collect and share data, research and best practices on implementation of respective measures; 6441/18 JV/mdc 2

ACKNOWLEDGING that measures provided to drug using offenders as an alternative to conviction or punishment, including imprisonment, are an evidence-based and fundamental support to people who need assistance due to their drug use or addiction; REITERATING the principle of continuity of care throughout the criminal justice proceedings as well as the principle of proportionality in national policies, also as regards offences committed by drug using offenders; ACKNOWLEDGING that alternatives to imprisonment for drug using offenders might reduce repeat offending rates and relieve financial and administrative burden and social costs, while also increasing social inclusion; CONSIDERING that there is a need to continue the efforts to ensure that alternative measures are upheld in global drug policy; NOTING that the Commission's report of 2016 on "Study on alternatives to coercive sanctions as response to drug law offences and drug-related crimes" 1 concluded that all Member States have at least one alternative measure to coercive sanctions in place and some have multiple, and that generally the available alternatives relate to treatment. While also RECALLING that the study highlighted practical and administrative barriers to the use of alternatives to coercive sanctions that exist across Member States and that the data required to evaluate and improve alternative measures, particularly in relation to completion rates and the needs of those receiving them, is limited; REFERRING to the European Union Drugs Strategy 2013-2020 2 and European Union Action Plan on Drugs 2017-2020 3, which encourage Members States to provide and apply, where appropriate and in accordance with their Member States legal frameworks, alternatives to coercive sanctions for drug using offenders, such as education, suspension of sentence with treatment, suspension of investigation or prosecution, rehabilitation and recovery and aftercare and social reintegration; 1 Study on alternatives to coercive sanctions as response to drug law offences and drugrelated crimes, May 2016, RAND Europe for the European Commission 2 OJ C 402, 29.12.2012, p. 1-10 3 OJ C 215, 5.7.2017, p. 21-58 6441/18 JV/mdc 3

NOTING that alternatives to coercive sanctions can be applied for a range of offences, such as offences committed due to the drug use, that in many Member States drug consumption and/or drug possession for personal use do not constitute a criminal offence and that Member States may impose such measures as a matter of right in any relevant cases involving drug-using offenders according to the law of the Member State concerned; NOTING that due to diverse legal frameworks and needs, the adoption and implementation of alternative measures to coercive sanctions should be tailored by the Member States according to the realities and to their national legal frameworks; RECALLING that the implementation of such measures should be accompanied by further studies on the EU level with a view of providing reliable and comparable data on their application; ACKNOWLEDGING that the term "alternatives to coercive sanctions" could, according to the national legislation of the Member States, also refer to alternatives that are used instead of or in addition alongside the traditional criminal justice measures for drug-using offenders; RECOGNISING that it is within the competence of Member States to develop and adopt national criminal justice policies and criminal laws on the definition of drug offences and sanctions according to Article 83 TFEU, while RECALLING that according to Article 168 TFEU, the European Union shall complement the Member States' action in reducing drugs-related health damage, including information and prevention; 6441/18 JV/mdc 4

THE COUNCIL 1. STRESSES the need for the Member States to provide and apply where appropriate and in accordance with their legal frameworks alternative measures to coercive sanctions for drug using offenders in order to prevent crime, reduce recidivism and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the criminal justice system, while also looking at a possible reduction of health related harms and minimisation of social risks. 2. ENCOURAGES the Member States where appropriate and within their national legislation to provide and further promote the availability, effective implementation, monitoring and evaluation of measures provided as an alternative to coercive sanctions for drug using offenders, such as education, (suspension of sentence with) treatment, suspension of investigation or prosecution, rehabilitation and recovery, aftercare and social reintegration. 3. RECALLS that these measures may be implemented in different stages of proceedings of offences committed by drug using offenders including pre-trial referral, where appropriate, and in accordance with national legislation. 4. INVITES the Member States to examine within national policies existing data on implementation of these measures, and sharing it with relevant European and national reporting authorities and monitoring systems. 5. INVITES the Member States to raise awareness, for example through training, on availability and effective use of these measures and to support cooperation and collaboration among national policy makers, law enforcement, criminal justice, public health, social and education professionals and, where appropriate, persons providing support to drug-using offenders. 6. CALLS upon the Member States, the European Union institutions, agencies and bodies to strengthen international cooperation by promoting and sharing good practices with non-eu countries on the use of measures provided as an alternative to coercive sanctions and evidence on the effectiveness of these measures. 6441/18 JV/mdc 5

7. INVITES the EMCDDA to continue to monitor the measures and to exchange information and best practices on implementation, development of these measures, their effectiveness and costeffectiveness, and also INVITES the Commission to support this work. 8. RECALLS the Commission s obligation for an overall evaluation of the implementation of the EU Drugs Strategy (2013-2020) and the EU Action Plan on Drugs 2017-2020, which, inter alia, has to take into account the findings on the issue of alternatives to coercive sanctions. 6441/18 JV/mdc 6