The health risks of exposure to internal radiation. Korea National Assembly Seoul 22 nd August 2015

Similar documents
Radiation in Everyday Life

Everyday Radiation. David D. Dixon HDT Rally Hutchinson, KS October 15, 2014

Everyday Radiation. David D. Dixon HDT Rally Hutchinson, KS October 13, 2015

Ionizing Radiation. Alpha Particles CHAPTER 1

Hiroshima / Fukushima: Gender Matters in the Atomic Age

A PROBLEM OF LOW DOSE EFFECTS:

The health outcome of the Fukushima catastrophe Initial analysis from risk model of the European Committee on Radiation Risk ECRR.

BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF

Cancer Risk Factors in Ontario. Other Radiation

Application of the Commission's Recommendations for the Protection of People in

Radiation physics and radiation protection. University of Szeged Department of Nuclear Medicine

Radiation Health Effects

Biological Effects of Radiation KJ350.

DOWNLOAD OR READ : IONIZING RADIATION EFFECTS IN ELECTRONICS FROM MEMORIES TO IMAGERS DEVICES CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS BOOK 50 PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

ICRP 128 ICRP ICRP ICRP 1928

Ionizing Radiation. Michael J. Vala, CHP. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Core Concepts in Radiation Exposure 4/10/2015. Ionizing Radiation, Cancer, and. James Seward, MD MPP

Radiobiology Hall 14: Radiologic Terrorism (Completed)

Special Topic: Radiological Dispersal Device or Dirty Bomb EXPLOSION AND BLAST INJURIES

1. The Accident of Chernobyl Unit 4 of 1,000 MWe Graphite-Moderated Boiling Water Pressure Tube Reactor in 1986

International Food Safety Authorities Network (INFOSAN) INFORMATION on Nuclear accidents and radioactive contamination of foods 30.

Understanding Radiation and Its Effects

Fukushima: What We All Should Know about Radiation

Hazards + uses of emissions; Background radiation

RADIATION RISK ASSESSMENT

Genomic Sacrifice Absorbed Dose vs. Second Event

Is there a safe level of radiation exposure? The Petkau effect

UNSCEAR Recent and Future Programme of Work. Emil Bédi

IONIZING RADIATION, HEALTH EFFECTS AND PROTECTIVE MEASURES

An update: Dealing with radiation as a hazard. WAJ Meintjes MBChB; DOM; FCPHM(SA) Occ Med; MMed (Occ Med)

REVIEW Nuclear Disaster after the Earthquake and Tsunami of March 11

Introduction To Nuclear Power Module 3: Understanding Radiation and Its Effects

Thomas S. Tenforde. President CIRMS 2006 Conference. National Institute of Standards & Technology Gaithersburg, Maryland October 23-25, 2006

Radioactivity. Lecture 8 Biological Effects of Radiation

Ernest Rutherford:

CONTENTS NOTE TO THE READER...1 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS...3

HEALTH PHYSICS PHYS 6700

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

The Principles of Radiation Monitoring and the Radiation Protection System in Hong Kong. H.M.Mok Physicist Radiation Health Unit Department of Health

Lecture 14 Exposure to Ionizing Radiation

Laboratory Safety 197/405. Types of Radiation 198/405

Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation & Commonly Used Radiation Units

What is the current risk of radiation-related health problems in Japan to those near the reactor at the time, and those in other parts of Japan?

Lab & Rad Safety Newsletter

RADIATION HAZARDS. A dabbler s perspective. Jess H. Brewer

FUNDAMENTAL SAFETY OVERVIEW VOLUME 2: DESIGN AND SAFETY CHAPTER S: RISK REDUCTION CATEGORIES 3. RADIOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES OF SEVERE ACCIDENTS

THE OTHER REPORT ON CHERNOBYL (TORCH)

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health ISSN

Q&A: Health effects of radiation exposure

Radioactivity. Alpha particles (α) :

Training Course on Medical Preparedness and Response for a Nuclear or Radiological Emergency Pre- Test - BASIC

The Epidemiology of Leukaemia and other Cancers in Childhood after Exposure to Ionising Radiation

Topic 6 Benefits and drawbacks of using radioactive materials

Radiation Effects. Radiobiology Steve Curtis Desert Research Institute

Health Physics and the Linear No-Threshold Model

Where does the estimate of 29,000 cancers come from? Based on Table 12D from BEIR VII, + risk estimates for 56,900,000 patients

Public and Worker Health Impacts from the Fukushima Nuclear Plant Accident Thomas McKone, PhD & James Seward, MD, MPP

Effects of Radiation on Human In the Face of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident

Radiation Metrics and the Media Confusion Fuels Public Fears

Introduction to UNSCEAR and the UNSCEAR report of 2016

DEPLETED SCIENCE: HEALTH CONSEQUENCES AND MECHANISMS OF EXPOSURE TO FALLOUT FROM DEPLETED URANIUM WEAPONS. CHRIS BUSBY PhD

Health Effects of Ionizing Radiation

RERF s Views on Residual Radiation 8 December 2012 Radiation Effects Research Foundation. Introduction

Nuclear Radiation Today

Issues to Discuss 2/28/2018. The Adverse Effects of Occupational and Environmental Ionizing Radiation: James Seward, MD MPP. Past, Present, and Future

Howard Dickson President Emeritus Health Physics Society

Radiological Protection Countermeasures after TEPCO Fukushima NPP Accident -Who should play the role of risk communication-

ROUND TABLE 1: Health risk management Health examinations in different workplaces

Risks from Internal Emitters - misuse of equivalent and effective dose

Principles of Radiation

The activity. Suggested Answers

United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation

Joint RERF-ICRP Workshop on Health Risk of Radiation and the System of Radiological Protection Tokyo, Japan, 09 Oct 2016

Master List of Key Words (Revised 6 December 2007)

Progress in understanding radon risk

Radiation Safety Information for Students in Courses given by the Nuclear Physics Group at KTH, Stockholm, Sweden

Radiation Safety in the Workplace. v1.0

RADIOACTIVITY & RADIATION CHARACTERISTICS

Presentation. To the BAPE Panel on Uranium Mining In Quebec. by Gordon Edwards, Ph.D. November 17, 2014

Radiation and Health. Author: Dr Bill Williams. energyscience.org.au

Radiation Safety. Bethany Gillett 14th Feb After this lecture, you should be able to:

Sources of Data of Stochastic Effects of Radiation. Michael K O Connor, Ph.D. Dept. of Radiology, Mayo Clinic

Monitoring radiation levels in the Pacific Northwest

Health consequences of chronic internal contaminations by radionuclides

Skin dose from Ra-226 contamination: Dose estimation & comments

Chapter 8. Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation

Basic radiation protection & radiobiology

ASSESSMENT OF CHERNOBYL MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS IN EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Ionizing radiation. What is ionizing radiation?

NEUTRONS. 1. Exposure Data

Radiation Safety for New Medical Physics Graduate Students

RADIATION SAFETY INFORMATION REGARDING BODIES CONTAINING RADIOACTIVE METASTRON

Role and Responsibility of Medical Staff in Nuclear Accident

Fukushima nuclear power plant and your health

Emily Kröger, German Federal Office for Radiation Protection, International Symposium on Nuclear Security, Vienna, 30 March - 3 April 2009.

Environmental Health Physics

Genome Instability is Breathtaking

RADON RESEARCH IN MULTI DISCIPLINES: A REVIEW

Malcolm Crick, Secretary of UNSCEAR

CONTROLLABLE DOSE: A discussion on the control of individual doses from single sources. Roger H Clarke

Transcription:

The health risks of exposure to internal radiation Korea National Assembly Seoul 22 nd August 2015

Christopher Busby Green Audit UK/ Environmental Research SIA, Riga, Latvia Scientific Secretary: European Committee on Radiation Risk, ECRR --Previously-- UK Ministry of Defence Depleted Uranium Oversight Board (DUOB) UK Dept of Health Committee Examining Radiation Risks from Internal Emitters (CERRIE) Leader: European Union Science/ Policy interface; Policy Information Network for Child Health and the Environment (PINCHE). Visiting Professor, University of Ulster UK Guest Researcher, University of Liverpool UK Guest Researcher, Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany Guest Researcher, Federal German Agricultural Research Laboratory Visiting researcher Julius Kuehn Institute, Braunschweig, Germany christo@greenaudit.org

Seen here looking for Depleted Uranium with a scintillation counter. Serbian tank in Kosovo 2001

Summary: Sources of man-made radiation exposure Enhancement of natural radioactive pollution (Uranium mining and processing, nuclear fuel cycle, depleted uranium weapons, natural gas and oil production, phosphate fertilisers, radium dials); Uranium and Radium Dispersion of fission products (Caesium-137, Plutonium-239, Strontium-90, Iodine-131, etc.). Main examples: 1. Atmospheric weapons tests, licensed nuclear power station and reprocessing releases (Sellafield, La Hague), nuclear accidents (Chernobyl 1986, Windscale 1957 etc),research uses of radioisotopes 2. Medical exposures (X-rays, cancer therapy)

Main types of Radiation Electromagnetic radiation is an energetic form of light: this includes gamma radiation and X-rays. Gamma rays pass right through you and the electron tracks produced are sparsely ionising. Charged particle radiation: includes energetic electrons (beta) and slower highly ionising alpha particles. These are released from radioactive materials like natural Uranium, Potassium-40 and also man-made substances called radionuclides, like Plutonium-239, Caesium-137 and Strontium-90. These are made by the fission of Uranium-235 and since 1945 have contaminated the entire biosphere. Beta tracks vary in their ionising density but alpha tracks are highly ionising.

1. Ionising radiation, whatever its source or type, is absorbed by materials with the creation of charged particle tracks which leave structured paths of ions and reactive chemical species. 2. It is these fragments that react with DNA and cause fixed mutations and cancer.

The target for radiation effects is the cellular DNA

It is mutation of the DNA that leads to cancer, birth defects and other diseases

. Internal radiation from Uranium and Uranium fission Fission products are versions of natural chemical elements which are radioactive. They become incorporated into the body through the food chain and inhalation. Many of them bind to DNA and have local serious genetic effects which are not predicted by the scientific risk model which is the basis of all present exposure risk standards, that of the International Commission of Radiological Protection (ICRP). For this reason, in 1997 I helped start an alternative risk committee, the European Committee on Radiation Risk (ECRR), whose model was published in 2003 and updated in 2010. This model predicts and explains the effects of internal radiation exposure. It has now been published in Japanese, Russian, French. Since Fukushima it is a free download from the website: www.euradcom.org

Examples of internal exposures Examples of common contamination fission products considered to be serious health hazards by ECRR include Strontium-90, Plutonium-239, Barium-140, Tellurium-132/Iodine-131 and Tritium. ECRR also has concluded that Uranium-238, which although natural, has become enhanced in its dispersion and character by man-made activity is a seriously underestimated hazard due to its chemical affinity for DNA and its high atomic number photoelectron conversion. Other enhanced internal exposures include Radium contamination from oil and gas production. The EU radiation research group MELODI, led by the French IRSN has recently ( March 2015) acknowledged the dangers of Uranium by investing in a huge research effort on internal Uranium exposure

Radiation exposure and health Health effects modelled on the basis of cancer yield in survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs. This is the model of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) In this model, the numbers of cancers in the survivors who were exposed to a single large acute EXTERNAL flash of gamma radiation are correlated with the ABSORBED DOSE and a straight line is drawn between this yield and no dose. Linear No Threshold LNT. The method is based on the assumption that all cells in the body receive the same number of radiation tracks. But this is not a valid assumption for INTERNAL radiation where track density varies from place to place.

But doses are based on EXTERNAL EXPOSURE ICRP phantom: body is modelled as a bag of water and radiation is assumed external. ABSORBED DOSE is ENERGY divided by MASS, Joules/Kg = Gray This method gives same dose for warming yourself in front of a fire or eating a hot coal.

A real hot coal - micron diameter particles of Plutonium in a rat lung: alpha stars

It is now universally acknowledged that radiation effects are nor due to whole body exposure but due to DNA damage. So the target is not even the cell, but is mainly the chromosomal DNA. It is therefore the dose to the DNA that is relevant for radiation protection. There are specific mechanisms that enhance the ionisation at the DNA. All cellular DNA including bound water is 1/87 th of the cell by mass.

The Linear assumption is also wrong: (from Busby 2013)

Dose the key issue in radioprotection. The misunderstandings about the quantity Absorbed Dose are fundamental to the understanding of the health effects of exposure to radioactive contamination, from Hiroshima to Fukushima, from Atmospheric Test fallout effects to Nuclear plant releases to Chernobyl and Fukushima.

UK Health Protection Agency Dose Table (msv) Dental X-ray 0.005 Transatlantic flight 0.07 Nuclear worker annual average 0.18 CT scan of head 1.4 UK average annual 2.7 CT chest scan 6.6 blood cell changes are measurable 100 No cancer detectably predicted 100 Acute deterministic effects 1000 Death in 50% exposed 5000

But these are doses based on average energy in large volumes of tissue from whole organs to whole body; averaged over more than 1kg. Dose to the cell or to the DNA is very large from internal exposures. Exposure Alpha track to the cell U-238 or Pu- 239 Dose to DNA from phosphate bound Uranium decay Dose to DNA from single Tritium decay in cell Phantom photoelectron amplification by Uranium/DNAP Dose >300mSv >1000mSv 5mSv >200,000 times natural background Gamma dose at the DNA.

LOW DOSES? Doses to 10m cell from internal a- decay (5MeV per decay) event msv Example Single decay 385 msv Any alpha emitter Sequential decays Hot particle 1m diameter Warm particle 1m 1540 msv per decay 570 msv per minute 4.4 msv per day Th-228, Ra-224, Rn- 220, Po-216 Pu-239 U-238 ignoring b daughters and photoelectrons

This is addressed in: Busby Intech 2013 Busby Christopher (2013). Aspects of DNA Damage from Internal Radionuclides, New Research Directions in DNA Repair, Prof. Clark Chen (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-1114-6, InTech, DOI: 10.5772/53942. Available from: http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-researchdirections-in-dna-repair/aspects-of-dna-damagefrom-internal-radionuclides This 50 page article reviews the problem of external and internal doses discussing the evidence and citing the previous literature.