Vaccine 22 (2004)

Similar documents
Cationic Liposome-DNA Complexes as Immunomodulators and Vaccine Adjuvants

Medical Virology Immunology. Dr. Sameer Naji, MB, BCh, PhD (UK) Head of Basic Medical Sciences Dept. Faculty of Medicine The Hashemite University

Antigen Presentation and T Lymphocyte Activation. Abul K. Abbas UCSF. FOCiS

IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY. CD4 T Follicular Helper Cells. Memory CD8 T Cell Differentiation

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Lecture 9: T-cell Mediated Immunity

Nature Immunology: doi: /ni Supplementary Figure 1. Gene expression profile of CD4 + T cells and CTL responses in Bcl6-deficient mice.

Are we targeting the right HIV determinants?

There are 2 major lines of defense: Non-specific (Innate Immunity) and. Specific. (Adaptive Immunity) Photo of macrophage cell

Supporting Information

LECTURE 12: MUCOSAL IMMUNITY GUT STRUCTURE

Memory CD4 T Cells Enhance Primary CD8 T-Cell Responses

Determinants of Immunogenicity and Tolerance. Abul K. Abbas, MD Department of Pathology University of California San Francisco

Lymphocyte Migration to/from the Gut Tissue-specific markers of enteric vaccines immunogenicity

days days and gbt-i.cd Recipient 20

Molecular and Cellular Basis of Immune Protection of Mucosal Surfaces

EBV Infection and Immunity. Andrew Hislop Institute for Cancer Studies University of Birmingham

Trends in vaccinology

1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity

3. Lymphocyte proliferation (fig. 15.4): Clones of responder cells and memory cells are derived from B cells and T cells.

Immunity and Cancer. Doriana Fruci. Lab di Immuno-Oncologia

M.Sc. III Semester Biotechnology End Semester Examination, 2013 Model Answer LBTM: 302 Advanced Immunology

General Overview of Immunology. Kimberly S. Schluns, Ph.D. Associate Professor Department of Immunology UT MD Anderson Cancer Center

Memory NK cells during mousepox infection. Min Fang, Ph.D, Professor Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Science

Presented by Lucas Nemec. Nat. Med. 21, (2015)

Dendritic cells in cancer immunotherapy Aimin Jiang

24 26 January 2013, Hong Kong SAR, CHINA. TITLE from VIEW and SLIDE MASTER February 27, 2013

Mon, Wed, Fri 11:00 AM-12:00 PM. Owen, Judy, Jenni Punt, and Sharon Stranford Kuby-Immunology, 7th. Edition. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.

Genetics. Environment. You Are Only 10% Human. Pathogenesis of IBD. Advances in the Pathogenesis of IBD: Genetics Leads to Function IBD

Zheng, BJ; Du, LY; Zhao, GY; Lin, YP; Sui, HY; Chan, C; Ma, S; Guan, Y; Yuen, KY. Citation Hong Kong Medical Journal, 2008, v. 14 suppl. 4, p.

Innate immune cells---- one time migration preprogrammed homing properties

Properties & Overview of IRs Dr. Nasser M. Kaplan JUST, Jordan. 10-Jul-16 NM Kaplan 1

Chapter 1. Chapter 1 Concepts. MCMP422 Immunology and Biologics Immunology is important personally and professionally!

The humoral immune responses to IBV proteins.

T cell memory Friday, February 10, 17

Institute t of Experimental Immunology University of Bonn, Germany

Since the introduction of the first vaccines by Edward Jenner

Gp96-Ig-SIV VACCINES INDUCE PREDOMINANT IMMUNE RESPONSES AT MUCOSAL SITES

Adaptive Immunity. Lecture 14 Biology W3310/4310 Virology Spring Life is simple, but we insist on making it complicated CONFUCIUS

Theiler s Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus-Induced CNS Autoimmunity

Immune response. This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it.

Immunological memory.

L-selectin Is Essential for Delivery of Activated CD8 + T Cells to Virus-Infected Organs for Protective Immunity

number Done by Corrected by Doctor Sameer

Introduction to Immunology Part 2 September 30, Dan Stetson

The mouse cholera toxin model for evaluation of allergenicity

Mucosal Immunology Sophomore Dental and Optometry Microbiology Section I: Immunology. Robin Lorenz

TCR, MHC and coreceptors

Immunology Basics Relevant to Cancer Immunotherapy: T Cell Activation, Costimulation, and Effector T Cells

Putting it Together. Stephen Canfield Secondary Lymphoid System. Tonsil Anterior Cervical LN s

Adaptive Immunity: Humoral Immune Responses

Supplementary Information:

TITLE: MODULATION OF T CELL TOLERANCE IN A MURINE MODEL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA

Chapter 1. Full file at

Nature Medicine: doi: /nm.3922

Kinetics of Local and Systemic Immune Responses after Vaginal Immunization with Recombinant Cholera Toxin B Subunit in Humans

ACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS. Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT

MCB 4211 Basic Immunology 2nd Exam; 10/26/17 Peoplesoft #:

The Adaptive Immune Response. B-cells

Mucosal vaccination overcomes the barrier to recombinant vaccinia immunization caused by preexisting poxvirus immunity

PBS Class #2 Introduction to the Immune System part II Suggested reading: Abbas, pgs , 27-30

Preface and Acknowledgments Preface and Acknowledgments to the Third Edition Preface to the Second Edition Preface to the First Edition

Review Questions: Janeway s Immunobiology 8th Edition by Kenneth Murphy

IMMUNOLOGICAL MEMORY. May 28, 2017

B220 CD4 CD8. Figure 1. Confocal Image of Sensitized HLN. Representative image of a sensitized HLN

TITLE: Development of Antigen Presenting Cells for adoptive immunotherapy in prostate cancer

Advances in Cancer Immunotherapy

Measles IgM ELISA Kit

Pro5 MHC Pentamers. Dr. Jeremy Fry. Copyright ProImmune Limited All Rights Reserved

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets

Supplementary Figures

1. The scavenger receptor, CD36, functions as a coreceptor for which TLR? a. TLR ½ b. TLR 3 c. TLR 4 d. TLR 2/6

Mouse Total IgA Antibody Detection Kit

Immunology - Lecture 2 Adaptive Immune System 1

Mucosal Immune System

Adaptive immune responses: T cell-mediated immunity

Mouse Anti-OVA IgM Antibody Assay Kit

LBL 3 terms/discussion questions posted BNG Seminar Monday! Lippman 017, Common Hour (w/ lunch) Julie Czupryna, Ph.D.

1. Specificity: specific activity for each type of pathogens. Immunity is directed against a particular pathogen or foreign substance.

Cell-mediated Immunity

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

Dendritic cell subsets and CD4 T cell immunity in Melanoma. Ben Wylie 1 st year PhD Candidate

staining and flow cytometry

Helminth worm, Schistosomiasis Trypanosomes, sleeping sickness Pneumocystis carinii. Ringworm fungus HIV Influenza

Heterosubtypic immunity. Professor Ajit Lalvani FMedSci Chair of Infectious Diseases 14/07/2014

Recombinant adeno-associated virus vectors induce functionally impaired transgene product specific CD8 + T cells in mice

Effector mechanisms of cell-mediated immunity: Properties of effector, memory and regulatory T cells

Physiology Unit 3. ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY The Specific Immune Response

5. Over the last ten years, the proportion of HIV-infected persons who are women has: a. Increased b. Decreased c. Remained about the same 1

Clinical Trials of Pandemic Vaccines: Key Issues. John Treanor University of Rochester Rochester, NY

Dendritic Cell Based Immunotherapy for Cancer. Edgar G. Engleman, M.D.

Role for CD40 and CD40L Expression in Generating CD8 T Cell Response to Minor Histcompatibility Antigen, H60

Mucosal Immunization for Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges. Ralph Michael Peace. Department of Pathology Duke University.

Defensive mechanisms include :

IN VIVO STUDIES ON VIRAL VIRULENCE

Supplementary Materials for

FOR OPTIMAL GUT HEALTH KEMIN.COM/GUTHEALTH

activation with anti-cd3/cd28 beads and 3d following transduction. Supplemental Figure 2 shows

all of the above the ability to impart long term memory adaptive immunity all of the above bone marrow none of the above

Transcription:

Vaccine 22 (2004) 1390 1394 Non-replicating mucosal and systemic vaccines: quantitative and qualitative differences in the Ag-specific CD8 + T cell population in different tissues Udi Qimron a, Lada Paul a, Erez Bar-Haim b, Noga Bloushtain a, Lea Eisenbach b, Herman F. Staats c, Angel Porgador a, a Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences and the Cancer Research Center, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 84105, Israel b Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel c Department of Medicine, Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA Received 10 April 2003; received in revised form 6 October 2003; accepted 4 November 2003 Abstract Directed dissemination of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells to infected organs or cancerous tissues is a prerequisite for optimal immunotherapy. Ag-specific CD8 + T cells were quantitated in systemic and mucosal tissues after nasal, rectal, or cutaneous immunization with CTL epitope peptide and the adjuvant cholera toxin (CT). Mucosal and cutaneous immunization induced Ag-specific CD8 + lymphocytes that were detectable in both mucosal and systemic compartments, suggesting a less strict distribution pattern than that known for B cells. However, optimal localization, activation and phenotype of these cells correlated with the route of immunization. In accordance with this observation, protection against a mucosal challenge with a virus expressing the CTL epitope was superior in mucosally-immunized animals. 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Mucosal/systemic vaccines; Non-replicating; CT; CTL; Virus; Cancer Immunization strategies that induce homing and localization of Ag-specific lymphocytes to mucosal tissues may be required for protection against pathogens that infect at mucosal tissues or cancers that develop at or metastasize to mucosal tissues. The route of immunization might influence the type, magnitude and localization of Ag-specific immunity within mucosal and systemic compartments. We have reported that nasal immunization, but not systemic immunization, induced Ag-specific IgA in mucosal secretions [1,2]. These studies and others have suggested that systemic route of immunization, with a non-replicative vaccine, generates Ag-specific Ab-secreting cells that may not travel to mucosal organs [1 3]. We and others have also reported that mucosal immunization with a non-replicative vaccine, composed from peptide immunogen and CT adjuvant, induced Ag-specific CTL in mucosal and systemic compartments [4 6]. Belyakov et al. further showed that systemic immunization with IFA + peptide induced CTL responses that were detected in systemic tissues only [5]. Similarly, we compared CT + peptide nasal vaccine to CFA + peptide cu- Corresponding author. Tel.: +972-8-6477283; fax: +972-8-6477626. E-mail address: angel@bgumail.bgu.ac.il (A. Porgador). taneous vaccine. We observed that in the peritoneal cavity, which is considered a systemic compartment, both vaccines induced similar numbers of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells. Yet, in the lung, a mucosal organ, CT + peptide nasal vaccine potently induced specific CTL and Ag-specific CD8 + T cells, while no CTL activity or Ag-specific CD8 + T cells were detected following the CFA-based cutaneous vaccine (data not shown). Thus, it might be concluded that systemic immunization with a non-replicative vaccine is not capable of inducing a CTL that travel to mucosal sites. However, because cutaneous immunization utilized Freund s adjuvants while nasal immunization utilized CT as the adjuvant, differences in the accumulation of Ag-specific CTL in different tissues may have been a result of the adjuvant utilized and not the route of immunization. Therefore, to accurately measure the effect of route of delivery, we revisited the issue of CD8 + T cell distribution induced by a non-replicating vaccine, composed of a CTL epitope peptide and the same CT adjuvant. We analyzed the effect of different routes of immunization on the number and phenotype of CD8 + T cells in non-lymphoid mucosal organs as compared to the spleen. Vaccine composed from the H-2K b -presented ovalbumin 0264-410X/$ see front matter 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2003.11.043

U. Qimron et al. / Vaccine 22 (2004) 1390 1394 1391 257 264 aa peptide, SIINFEKL, and the CT adjuvant [4]. C57BL/6 mice were injected i.v. with OT-1 transgenic T cells [7], which are specific for H-2K b SIINFEKL complex, and immunized twice via the nasal, rectal or footpad route with CT + SIINFEKL. The number of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells in the lung, spleen and salivary glands (SG) was monitored 9 days after the last immunization (Fig. 1A). To monitor the specific CD8 + T cells responding to immunization with CT + SIINFEKL, we used Cy5-conjugated K b / 2m/SIINFEKL tetramers that would Fig. 1. The route of immunization affects the tissue distribution of tetramer +, CD45RB dull, and 7 + Ag-specific CD8 + T cells. OT-1 splenocytes (2 10 7 ) were transferred to C57BL/6 mice by i.v. injection. Mice were immunized intrafootpad, intranasal or intrarectal with CT + SIINFEKL on Days 2 and 16. Nine days after second immunization spleen, lung and SG were removed and mononuclear immune cells were purified as described [4 6]. Cells were: (A) stained with tetramer and anti-cd8, results are shown as the percentage of tetramer + CD8 + T cells of all CD8 + T cells; (B) stained for CD8, CD45RB and V 2.1 expression, results are shown as the percentage of CD45RB dull (activated cells) of CD8 + V 2.1 + T cells; and (C) stained for CD8, 7 integrin and V 2.1 expression, results are shown as the percentage of 7 + cells of CD8 + V 2.1 + T cells. All results are the average of three independent experiments. Bars, ± S.D.; ( ) immunization route that induces significantly greater: (A) % tetramer + CD8 +, (B) % CD45RB dull /CD8 + V 2.1 +, (C) % 7 + /CD8 + V 2.1 + cells in indicated tissue vs. non-immunized mice, P = 0.05 ANOVA.

1392 U. Qimron et al. / Vaccine 22 (2004) 1390 1394 stain both endogenous and transferred T cells that recognize the K b / 2m/SIINFEKL complex. Intranasal and intrafootpad immunization induced a significantly increased percentage of tetramer + CD8 + cells in the lung as compared to non-immunized mice (34.0 ± 7%, 35.7 ± 6.8%, respectively, versus 2.3 ± 2.6%; P = 0.05). The level of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells in the lung was comparable with both routes of immunizations, whereas in the spleen, intrafootpad immunization was the only route of immunization to induce significantly increased numbers of tetramer + CD8 + cells (16.3 ± 0.6%; P = 0.05); nearly four-fold greater than the percentage of tetramer + CD8 + cells induced by nasal or rectal immunization. Comparing this result to the observations with the IFA or CFA adjuvants, indicates that not only the route of immunization, but also the adjuvant used might affect the magnitude of the response. It also indicates that the distribution of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells, induced by a non-replicative vaccine, might have a different pattern than that observed for B cells and that a mucosal barrier in CTL is not as strict as thought. Intrarectal immunization was the only route of immunization to induce a significant increase in the percentage of tetramer + CD8 + cells in the SG (Fig. 1A). Comparison of intranasal and intrarectal routes (Fig. 1), indicates that even within the mucosal compartment, distinct routes of vaccination influence differently the outcome of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells. Similarly in the systemic compartment, subcutaneous immunization with CT + peptide results in poor induction of CD8 + T cells activity as compared to cutaneous (intrafootpad) immunization with CT + peptide (Fig. 1 and [4]). Most of the expanded and activated Ag-specific CD8 + T cells in the immunized mice, both in mucosal and systemic compartments, were originated from the transferred OT-1 cells as assessed by their expression of V 2.1, which is the V of the OT-1 transgenic TCR (data not shown). OT-1 CD8 + T cells to be transferred were harvested from the OT-1 spleen and manifested naïve phenotype (CD45RB high ) [8] just before transfer. Naïve T cells are preprogrammed to migrate and recirculate through spleen and secondary mucosal or systemic LN [9]. Thus, harvesting naïve OT-1 CD8 + T cells from the OT-1 spleen for the transfer, should not restrict their distribution to mucosal inductive sites in the immunized mice. Indeed, our results indicate that this assumption is correct (Fig. 1A). The mucosal barrier reappears in our results when analyzing the activation phenotype (CD45RB dull ) [8] and integrins pattern of the Ag-specific CD8 + T cells in the immunized mice. Nasal immunization resulted in activation of 68.5 ± 12.5% of the Ag-specific CD8 + T cells detected in the lung as compared to <20% for all other groups tested (P = 0.05; Fig. 1B). In the spleen, both the intranasal and intrafootpad route of immunization were associated with a significant increase in the percentage of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells expressing an activated phenotype (24.0 ± 2.6% and 34.8 ± 2.4%, respectively; P = 0.05). We did not detect differences in 4 7 expression on the Ag-specific CD8 + T cells isolated from the lung, spleen or salivary gland (data not shown). However, when tested for 7 expression, nasal immunization resulted in a significantly higher percentage of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells expressing 7 in the lung (22.4 ± 0.5%; P = 0.05, Fig. 1C). Staining for E integrin revealed similar results (data not shown) suggesting that nasal immunization was associated with induced expression of E 7 integrin on Ag-specific CD8 + T cells in the lung. Others have reported that the 7 integrin was required for activated OT-1 T cells to enter the small and large intestinal mucosal and that the E 7 integrin appeared to play no role in OT-1 migration during a primary immune response [10]. However, the association between E 7 or 4 7 expression and the migration of activated CD8 + T cells to the lung was not studied in this previously published paper. Although integrin E-deficient mice had no decrease in the number of CD3 + T cells in the lung as compared to wild-type, the affect of E-deficiency on Ag-specific CD8 + T cells was not studied [11]. We next compared vaccine-induced CD8 + T induction and spreading in the Peyer s patches (PP) and spleen as examples of mucosal and systemic inductive lymphoid tissues, respectively. Again, we immunized OT-1-transffered mice with the same vaccine formulation, CT + SIINFEKL, by the intranasal route or intrafootpad route. Immunization via the footpad induced a significantly greater percentage of tetramer-positive, CD8 + T cells in the spleen (11.0 ± 3%; P = 0.05) as compared to intranasal immunization (2.8 ± 1.9%). However, nasal immunization induced a significantly greater percentage of tetramer + CD8 + cells in the PP as compared to footpad immunization, with 31.3 ± 1.2% (P = 0.05) and 11.3 ± 8.5% of the CD8 + cells that are tetramer positive after nasal and footpad immunization, respectively (Fig. 2A). Our results indicate that mucosal immunization is superior to systemic immunization for the induction of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells that home to mucosal inductive lymphoid tissues such as PP, while systemic immunization is superior to mucosal immunization for the induction of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells that are detectable in systemic lymphoid tissues. Analysis of blood peripheral lymphocytes revealed phenotype similar to the spleen (data not shown). We further determined if Ag-specific CD8 + T responses induced by mucosal or systemic immunization were able to protect against an infectious challenge at a mucosal surface. Mice (without pre-transfer of OT-1 cells) were immunized twice with CT + SIINFEKL by the nasal or intrafootpad route and then infected rectally with a recombinant vaccinia expressing ovalbumin and -galactosidase (rvv-ova -gal) 9 days after the last immunization. This vaccinia strain has been found to home and replicate best in the ovaries; however, its pathway to the ovaries after intrarectal application involves gut inductive sites such as the PP. -Galactosidase activity was monitored in the ovary 3 days after challenge and used as a surrogate marker for viral load. Both routes of immunization showed protection against intrarectally administered rvv-ova -gal

U. Qimron et al. / Vaccine 22 (2004) 1390 1394 1393 Fig. 2. The route of immunization influences the lymphoid tissue distribution of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells and protection against a mucosal viral challenge. (A) Flow cytometry-based quantitation of parenteral and nasal routes of CT + SIINFEKL vaccine in PP and spleen. OT-1 splenocytes (2 10 7 ) were transferred to C57BL/6 mice by i.v. injection. Mice were immunized intrafootpad or intranasal with CT + SIINFEKL on Days 2 and 16. Nine days after second immunization, Spleen and PP were removed and mononuclear immune cells were purified as described [4 6]. Cells were stained with tetramer and anti-cd8. Results are shown as the percentage of tetramer + CD8 + T cells of all CD8 positive T cells. SIINFEKL is termed as OVA8 in graph. Results are the average of three independent experiments. Bars, ±S.D. ( ) immunization route that induces significantly greater % tetramer + CD8 + cells in indicated tissue, P = 0.05 ANOVA. (B) Load of rvv-ova -gal in the ovary in mice pre-immunized parenterally or nasally with CT + SIINFEKL. Mice were immunized intrafootpad or intranasal with CT + SIINFEKL on Days 2 and 16. Nine days after second immunization rvv-ova -gal (2 10 7 pfu per mouse, three mice per group) was applied intrarectally. Three days after, ovaries were harvested, pooled and homogenated, and -galactosidase activity in the homogenate was tested. Reaction of -galactosidase with CPRG substrate was measured in triplicates at wavelength of 570 nm. Results are the average of three independent experiments. O.D., optical density; Bars, ± SD. ( ) immunization route that induces significantly greater protection against vaccinia dissemination to the ovary after rectal infection, P = 0.05 ANOVA. Inset: immunohistochemical staining of -gal activity in an rvv-ova -gal-infected ovary. (Fig. 2B), but did not affect protection against a control rvv- -gal (data not shown). However, nasal immunization provided protection against rvv-ova -gal dissemination to the ovary that was superior to protection provided by intrafootpad immunization, suggesting that mucosal immunization is superior to systemic immunization for protection against a pathogenic challenge that initiates at a mucosal surface (P = 0.05; Fig. 2B). Intrarectal immunization with CT + SIINFEKL abolished the growth and dissemination of any intrarectal challenge of vaccinia, regardless of OVA antigen expression. This is possibly due to the induction of innate immunity by the rectal application of CT [12]. Others have shown that intrarectal immunization, but not cutaneous immunization with peptide and adjuvant, protected against an intrarectal challenge with vaccinia expressing the CTL antigen [13]. Our results confirm that mucosal (nasal) immunization is superior to systemic immunization for protection against a rectal viral challenge. Our results suggest that not only the route of immunization but also the adjuvant formulation affects the induction and distribution of Ag-specific CD8 + T cells induced by non-replicating vaccines. The observations also implicate that systemic immunization with an appropriate adjuvant can evoke immune response in mucosal organs. However, optimal localization, activation and phenotype of the cells correlated with the route of immunization. Ag-specific CD8 + T cells at mucosal tissues may play an important role in protection against pathogens that infect via mucosal tissues (this study and [5,14]) and cancers that develop at or metastasize to mucosal tissues and, therefore, more studies regarding tissue distribution and phenotype of vaccine induced T cells are needed. Acknowledgements This study was supported by grants from the USA Israel Binational Science Foundation, Israel Science Foundation, Israel Cancer Research Foundation and Israel Cancer Association. This work was also supported by the Cooperation Program in Cancer Research of the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) and Israel s Ministry of Science (MOS). U.Q. was supported by the Kreitman Foundation in BGU. References [1] Staats HF, Nichols WG, Palker TJ. Mucosal immunity to HIV-1: systemic and vaginal antibody responses after intranasal immunization with the HIV-1 C4/V3 peptide T1SP10 MN(A). J Immunol 1996;157(1):462 72. [2] Bradney CP, Sempowski GD, Liao HX, Haynes BF, Staats HF. Cytokines as adjuvants for the induction of anti-human immunodeficiency virus peptide immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibodies in serum and mucosal secretions after nasal immunization. J Virol 2002;76(2):517 24. [3] Quiding-Jarbrink M, Nordstrom I, Granstrom G, Kilander A, Jertborn M, Butcher EC, et al. Differential expression of tissue-specific adhesion molecules on human circulating antibody-forming cells after

1394 U. Qimron et al. / Vaccine 22 (2004) 1390 1394 systemic, enteric, and nasal immunizations. A molecular basis for the compartmentalization of effector B cell responses. J Clin Invest 1997;99(6):1281 6. [4] Porgador A, Staats HF, Faiola B, Gilboa E, Palker TJ. Intranasal immunization with CTL epitope peptides from HIV-1 or ovalbumin and the mucosal adjuvant cholera toxin induces peptide-specific CTLs and protection against tumor development in vivo. J Immunol 1997;158(2):834 41. [5] Belyakov IM, Derby MA, Ahlers JD, Kelsall BL, Earl P, Moss B, et al. Mucosal immunization with HIV-1 peptide vaccine induces mucosal and systemic cytotoxic T lymphocytes and protective immunity in mice against intrarectal recombinant HIV-vaccinia challenge. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1998;95(4):1709 14. [6] Staats HF, Bradney CP, Gwinn WM, Jackson SS, Sempowski GD, Liao H-X, et al. Cytokine requirements for induction of systemic and mucosal cytotoxic T lymphocytes after nasal immunization. J Immunol 2001;167:5386 94. [7] Hogquist KA, Jameson SC, Heath WR, Howard JL, Bevan MJ, Carbone FR. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 1994;76(1):17 27. [8] Bell EB, Sparshott SM, Bunce C. CD4+ T-cell memory, CD45R subsets and the persistence of antigen a unifying concept. Immunol Today 1998;19(2):60 4. [9] Kunkel EJ, Butcher EC. Chemokines and the tissue-specific migration of lymphocytes. Immunity 2002;16(1):1 4. [10] Lefrancois L, Parker CM, Olson S, Muller W, Wagner N, Schon MP, et al. The role of beta7 integrins in CD8 T cell trafficking during an antiviral immune response. J Exp Med 1999;189(10): 1631 8. [11] Schon MP, Arya A, Murphy EA, Adams CM, Strauch UG, Agace WW, et al. Mucosal T lymphocyte numbers are selectively reduced in integrin alpha E (CD103)-deficient mice. J Immunol 1999;162(11):6641 9. [12] Matsuo K, Yoshikawa T, Asanuma H, Iwasaki T, Hagiwara Y, Chen Z, et al. Induction of innate immunity by nasal influenza vaccine administered in combination with an adjuvant (cholera toxin). Vaccine 2002;18:2713 22. [13] Belyakov IM, Ahlers JD, Brandwein BY, Earl P, Kelsall BL, Moss B, et al. The importance of local mucosal HIV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic T lymphocytes for resistance to mucosal viral transmission in mice and enhancement of resistance by local administration of IL-12. J Clin Investig 1998;102(12):2072 81. [14] Belyakov IM, Hel Z, Kelsall B, Kuznetsov VA, Ahlers JD, Nacsa J, et al. Mucosal AIDS vaccine reduces disease and viral load in gut reservoir and blood after mucosal infection of macaques. Nat Med 2001;7(12):1320 6.