Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health Orlando VA Medical Center

Similar documents
Imaging Guidelines for Breast Cancer Screening

Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis

Breast Cancer Screening and High Risk

Breast Cancer Imaging

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

EARLY DETECTION: MAMMOGRAPHY AND SONOGRAPHY

Breast Imaging! Ravi Adhikary, MD!

Mammographic imaging of nonpalpable breast lesions. Malai Muttarak, MD Department of Radiology Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai, Thailand

Current Strategies in the Detection of Breast Cancer. Karla Kerlikowske, M.D. Professor of Medicine & Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UCSF

Breast Cancer Risk Factors 8/3/2014

Untangling the Confusion: Multiple Breast Cancer Screening Guidelines and the Ones We Should Follow

Imaging in breast cancer. Mammography and Ultrasound Donya Farrokh.MD Radiologist Mashhad University of Medical Since

Breast Cancer Screening: Changing Philosophies in Educating Women and Teens

Breast MRI Update. Jeffrey C. Weinreb, MD, FACR Yale University School of Medicine

Diagnostic Dilemmas of Breast Imaging

Non-mass Enhancement on Breast MRI. Aditi A. Desai, MD Margaret Ann Mays, MD

Update in Breast Cancer Screening

Epworth Healthcare Benign Breast Disease Symposium. Sat Nov 12 th 2016

Screening Mammography: Who, what, where, when, why and how?

Update in Breast Cancer Screening

Ge elastography cpt codes

Amammography report is a key component of the breast

Breast density: imaging, risks and recommendations

BREAST MRI. VASILIKI FILIPPI RADIOLOGIST CT MRI & PET/CT Departments Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece

Standard Breast Imaging Modalities. Lilian Wang, M.D. Breast Imaging Section Department of Radiology Northwestern Medicine

Examine breast cancer trends, statistics, and death rates, and impact of screenings. Discuss benefits and risks of screening

Disclosures. Breast Cancer. Breast Imaging Modalities. Breast Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer 6/4/2014

Mary Smania, DNP, FNP-BC Clinical Practice Champion Assistant Professor Michigan State University College of Nursing

S. Murgo, MD. Chr St-Joseph, Mons Erasme Hospital, Brussels

Tissue Breast Density

Camelia Davtyan, MD, FACP Clinical Professor of Medicine Director of Women s Health UCLA Comprehensive Health Program

The best way of detection of and screening for breast cancer in women with genetic or hereditary risk

Foundational funding sources allow BCCHP to screen and diagnose women outside of the CDC guidelines under specific circumstances in Washington State.

BREAST DENSITY WHAT IS IT? WHY IS IT IMPORTANT? & What IOWA SF250 Means to Patients and Providers

NATIONAL GUIDELINE CLEARINGHOUSE (NGC) GUIDELINE SYNTHESIS SCREENING FOR BREAST CANCER

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment: Genetics, Risk Models, and Screening. Amie Hass, MSN, ARNP, FNP-BC Hall-Perrine Cancer Center

DR AISHA A UMAR CHIEF CONSULTANT RADIOLOGIST NATIONAL HOSPITAL ABUJA.

Evaluations & CE Credits

MANAGEMENT OF DENSE BREASTS. Nichole K Ingalls, MD, MPH NW Surgical Specialists September 25, 2015

BREAST IMAGING and NEW IMAGING MODALITIES- A Surgeons view

Updates In Cancer Screening: Navigating a Changing Landscape

Mammography and Other Screening Tests. for Breast Problems

The Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Value of Supplemental Screening Tests Following Negative Mammography in Women with Dense Breast Tissue

Detection to Prediction: Imaging Markers of Breast Cancer Risk

Breast Cancer: Selected Topics for the Primary Care Clinician

Breast Evaluation & Management Guidelines

Shared Decision Making in Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening. An Update and a Patient-Centered Approach. Sharon K. Hull, MD, MPH July, 2017

Mammography. What is Mammography?

Breast Imaging & You

The Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Value of Supplemental Screening Tests Following Negative Mammography in Women with Dense Breast Tissue

HBOC Syndrome A review of BRCA 1/2 testing, Cancer Risk Assessment, Counseling and Beyond.

Screening Mammograms: Questions and Answers

Advances in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment. Heidi Memmel, MD FACS Surgical Director of Caldwell Breast Center September 26, 2015

Population Prospective. Big Picture

So, Who are the appropriate individuals that should consider genetic counseling and genetic testing?

Case 1. BREAST CANCER From Diagnosis to Treatment: The Role of Primary Care

Mammography. What is Mammography? What are some common uses of the procedure?

Breast Cancer Screening

5/24/16. Current Issues in Breast Cancer Screening. Breast cancer screening guidelines. Outline

Breast Imaging Lexicon

Breast Health and Imaging Glossary

Breast Imaging & You

Throughout this policy, bracketed numbers link topics across multiple sections according to the indication numbers in the following list.

Breast Cancer Screening

Ana Sofia Preto 19/06/2013

Breast Imaging Update: Old Dog New Tricks

BREAST CANCER. 1. Guidelines for Screening

Screening for Breast Cancer

6 OBG Management August 2015 Vol. 27 No. 8 obgmanagement.com

What s New in Breast Imaging. Jennifer A. Harvey, M.D., FACR Professor of Radiology University of Virginia

Imaging the Symptomatic Patient. Avice M.O Connell MD,FACR,FSBI Professor of Imaging Sciences Director, Women s Imaging University of Rochester

Breast Cancer Update 2018 The Latest in Diagnosis and Treatment SARATH K, PALAKODETI, DO, FAACS GENERAL, BREAST, AND COSMETIC SURGEON TOLEDO CLINIC

Pitfalls and Limitations of Breast MRI. Susan Orel Roth, MD Professor of Radiology University of Pennsylvania

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Prevention

Breast Disease: What PCPs Need to Know. Eunice Cho MD FACS

Breast Cancer Screening Clinical Practice Guideline. Kaiser Permanente National Breast Cancer Screening Guideline Development Team

Page 1. Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening! Selected Controversies. Breast Cancer Screening. ! Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice!

Women s Health: Breast Cancer Screening. K. Rast, MD and E. McNany, MD

AMSER Case of the Month: November 2018

Henda s Law. Supplemental screening for women with dense breast tissue and increased risk

Angela Gilliam, MD University of Colorado Surgical Grand Rounds November 3, 2008

Supplemental Screening for Dense Breasts. Reagan Leverett, MD, MS

Here are examples of bilateral analog mammograms from the same patient including CC and MLO projections.

2017 Breast Cancer Update

Emerging Techniques in Breast Imaging: Contrast-Enhanced Mammography and Fast MRI

Screening Mammography: The Controversy, Risk Assessment and Individualized Screening recommendations. Jonathan T. Sims MD, MBA

Policy Library Clinical Advantages of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Symptomatic Patients

EARLY DETECTION. Screening Mammography Programs. Knowledge Summary

Screening Mammography Policy and Politics. Kevin L. Piggott, MD, MPH August 29, 2015

Page 1. Cancer Screening for Women I have no conflicts of interest. Overview. Breast, Colon, and Lung Cancer. Jeffrey A.

ROLE OF MRI IN SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF BREAST CANCER. B.Zandi Professor of Radiology

Breast Cancer Screening in Women at Higher-Than-Average Risk: Recommendations From the ACR

Risk Assessment, Genetics, and Prevention

Current Status of Supplementary Screening With Breast Ultrasound

Breast Imaging Donald L. Renfrew, MD

The Radiology Aspects

National Diagnostic Imaging Symposium 2013 SAM - Breast MRI 1

Current issues and controversies in breast imaging. Kate Brown, South GP CME 2015

On the Clinical Importance of Benign Breast Disease: Causal Intermediary or Susceptibility Marker? Laura Reimers Iadeluca

Dense Breasts. A Breast Cancer Risk Factor and Imaging Challenge

Transcription:

Melissa Hartman, DO Women s Health Orlando VA Medical Center

Most common non-skin cancer and Second deadliest cancer in women Majority are diagnosed by abnormal screening study An approach to breast cancer screening should incorporate an individuals level of breast cancer risk, established by history and by use of a risk prediction model.

Age (Older > Younger) Nulliparity Menarche <11 Genetic predisposition Estrogen exposure Breast Density Women with 50-74% density have a 3 to 4 fold increased risk of breast CA compared to women with <5% breast density. Increased risk is particularly high in women who continue to have dense and nodular breast parenchyma beyond menopause.

Purpose: To stratify women into risk categories that can be used to determine optimal screening strategies and indications for possible prophylactic therapies. Breast Cancer Risk Assessment Tool (BCRAT) also known as the Gail Model Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Assesment Model also known as IBIS (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) BRCAPRO University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas and Duke University incorporates 6 predictive models for inherited or familial breast CA BOADICEA model determines breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility b/c of genetic mutations

Women 50 70 y/o: recommend screening with mammography. Women 40 50 y/o: recommend discussion of the risks and benefits of mammography, the decision to perform mammography should be determined by individual patient risk and values through shared decision making. Women > 70 y/o: recommend screening if their life expectancy is at least 10 years. Women < 40 y/o: advise against breast cancer screening.

Data is limited on the optimal frequency for performing mammography. Several Randomized trials evaluating the effectiveness of mammogram screening have used varying time intervals without apparent effect on study results.

Family h/o breast, ovarian, or peritoneal cancer - using one of several available risk tools to determine if she is a candidate for genetic testing. Women with a known genetic predisposition to breast cancer (ie. BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene mutation) should receive counseling for several preventative options, as well as more intense screening for breast cancer. Women without a known genetic syndrome, but who have a family h/o breast cancer in a 1 st degree relative, screening mammogram should be initiated at an earlier age, particularly if the family member had premenopausal breast cancer.

Women who test positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are at increased risk of both breast and ovarian cancer. Recommend referral for counseling to consider options for reducing risk and intensified surveillance. NCCN and ACS Guidelines: recommend annual mammogram and breast MRI for breast cancer surveillance.

Society American Cancer Society American College of Radiology American Medical Association National Cancer Institute ACOG NCCN USPSTF American College of Physicians American Academy of FP s Canadian Task Force 2011 Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention in European Union 2000 Recommended Age to Initiate 40 yo 40 yo 40 yo 40 yo 40 yo 40 yo 50 yo 50 yo 50 yo 50 yo 50 yo

Society USPSTF Canadian Task Force American College of Radiology ACOG Age to discontinue 74 yo 74 yo Until life expectancy is <5-7 yrs >75 yo should consult with their clinician Several groups do not explicitly state at what age breast cancer screening should stop.

Society Recommendation American Cancer Society Q3 yrs age 20-39, Q1 yr >40 ACOG Q1-2 yrs 20-39, Q1 yr >40 USPSTF Insufficient Evidence Canadian Task Force Recommends against WHO Does not recommend

Society Canadian Task Force USPSTF American Cancer Society ACOG WHO NCCN Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention in European Union Recommendation Against, on basis of no evidence of reduction of mortality and evidence of increased harm Against teaching women the procedure Women should be educated about the benefits and limitations of BSE Recommend breast self-awareness, which can include BSE Against BSE Against instruction on SBE No convincing evidence for the effect of screening based on BSE or CBE

Film Mammography Full Field Digital Mammography MRI Thermography Ultrasonography Tomosynthesis

Sensitivity: 84% Specificity: 90% 2012 meta-analysis of randomized trials found 20% relative risk reduction for breast CA mortality in women invited to screening compared to controls. 2014 long-term follow up study raises questions of a possible decreased impact of mammography as treatment for breast cancer has become more effective.

Image captured by an electronic detector and stored on a computer Several studies have found little difference in cancer detection rates between digital and film mammography Benefit is to radiologist because they can be lightened or darkened, and certain sections can be enlarged and looked at more closely.

Screening breast MRI has been found to be more sensitive but less specific than mammography for the detection of invasive cancers in high risk women.

ACS recommend offering annual MRI w/annual mammogram to women in certain high risk groups: Known BRCA mutation carriers 1 st degree relatives of known BRCA mutation carriers Women with a lifetime risk of breast cancer >20% NCCN recommend annual MRI w/annual mammogram for women with a strong family history or genetic predisposition: BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers Untested women w/1 st degree relative w/brca1/brca2 Lifetime risk >20% Received radiation treatment to chest between ages 10-30 yo Genetic mutation in TP53 or PTEN

NIH recommends offering annual MRI in addition to mammography to the following high-risk groups: BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers, and untested women with >30% probability of BRCA carrier, starting at age 30 until age 49; for women with a dense breast pattern continue until age 69 TP53 mutation carriers, starting at 20-69 yo Untested women with >30% probability of TP53 carrier, starting at age 20-49; for women with dense breast pattern, continue until age 69

The use of thermography to detect occult breast cancer was based on the observation that patients have elevated breast skin temperatures over their breast cancers. Specificity: LOW No major organization making screening recommendations recommend thermography.

Ultrasound has not been evaluated in randomized trials of breast cancer screening for an effect on reducing breast cancer mortality. NOT appropriate for initial screening Used as an adjunct to mammography for screening in women with increased breast density

Provides 3D images and is a modification of digital mammography using a moving xray source and digital detector. Approved in the US for breast cancer screening when used in combination with mammography Tomosynthesis + Mammogram = modestly increased rates of cancer detection and decreased recall rates for false-positive mammography readings. Effects on breast cancer mortality have not been assessed.

False Positive Readings More common in younger women, women with dense breast tissue, women who have mammograms more frequently Heightened anxiety May impact future screening behavior Over diagnosis Slow growing Cancers/regression of tumors detection of disease that would not have caused morbidity or mortality had it not been found 10-30% estimate of over diagnosis

As breast cancer screening has increased, the detection of DCIS has risen 20 % of the breast CA diagnosed in the US are DCIS The natural history of DCIS is not clear, may cases may not proceed to invasive CA.

Ionizing radiation increases the risk for breast CA Excess risk of breast CA after 10 year latent period is linearly dependent on: Radiation dose (high doses increase risk) Age at onset of screening (Younger age at exposure increases risk) Attained age or number of years since exposure (risk increases with increased time since expsoure)

Increases the image contrast and quality Decreases the radiation dose Allows for uniform x-ray penetration through the tissues Reduces motion and minimizes superimposition of tissues

Mammographic screening can be uncomfortable or painful, as the breast needs to be compressed to achieve adequate images. One well-designed study found that patientcontrolled breast compression reduced patient discomfort while achieving good image quality. Pre-medication with Tylenol or Ibuprofen did not reduce pain. Topical application of 4% Lidocaine gel to the breast and chest wall reduced discomfort. Reduced discomfort correlated with increased intent to return for another screening exam.

Spiculated focal mass positive predictive value is 81% Density of a non-calcified mass 70% of masses with high density are malignant, 22 % of masses with low density are malignant Clustered Microcalcifications (>4/5 per cubic cm), seen in approx 60% of cancers. Represent intraductal calcifications in areas of necrotic tumor or calcifications within mucin-secreting tumors. Linear Branching Microcalcifications have a higher predictive value for malignancy than do granular, particularly for high grade DCIS.

BI-RADS 0: Incomplete assessment Need additional imaging and/or prior mammograms for comparison BI-RADS 1: Negative BI-RADS 2: Benign Findings Benign nodules such as fibroadenomas, cysts, vascular or parenchymal calcifications BI-RADS 3: Probably benign findings likely hood of malignancy is <2 %. Usually followed with diagnostic mammogram and US Q6 mo x 1 year, then annually for additional 2 years. BI-RADS 4: Suspicious abnormality Bx should be considered BI-RADS 5: Highly suggestive of Malignancy spiculations, pleomorphic calcifications, skin retraction. The suspicion for malignancy is 95 to 100% BI-RADS 6: Biopsy-proven malignancy

Breast implants obscure small lesions, require 4 views instead of usual 2 views per breast Implants placed behind the pectoralis muscle are easier to position Prior biopsy or surgery for benign disease Reduced mammogram specificity and lower positive predictive value Breast reconstruction/post mastectomy Mammogram not routinely performed follow mastectomy when no breast tissue is left behind Pregnancy and Lactation Only preformed for evaluation of suspected cancer and to assess clinical findings not clarified with ultrasound Most breast disorders encountered during this period are benign and secondary to hormonal changes However, breast cancer in pregnancy represents up to 3% of all breast cancers Postmenopausal hormone therapy Increases breast density and may decrease sensitivity of mammogram Males Only done for suspected masses

Screening No clinical symptoms or complaints 2 standard views obtained for each breast Diagnostic Women or men who present with breast complaints or have an abnormal clinical exam and in women who have abnormal screening mammograms Always supervised by a radiologist Views are tailored to specific abnormality Focal Spot compression applying focal compression to the area of interest in the breast using a small compression paddle Magnification spot compression performed to further characterize the morphology of calcifications and shape of a mass 90 degree lateral view true lateral view of the breast

References up on request