Effect of maize - stover compost and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril.

Similar documents
Nutrient Content of Vegetable Amaranth (Amaranths cruentus L.) At Different Harvesting Stages

Use of Soil and Tissue Testing for Sustainable Crop Nutrient Programs

Plant Food. Nitrogen (N)

FACT SHEET. Understanding Cation Exchange Capacity and % Base Saturation

Soils and Soil Fertility Management

Growth of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) seedlings on old cocoa soils amended with organic and inorganic fertilizers

Potassium and Phosphorus as Plant Nutrients. Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients. Potassium is required in large amounts by many crops

Soil Composition. Air

Interpreting Soils Report. Beyond N P K

Nutrients & Diagnosing Nutrient Needs. Carrie Laboski Dept. of Soil Science UW-Madison

Plant Nutrients in Mineral Soils

Response of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) to Various Levels of Nitrogen and Potassium at Different Crop Growth Stages

Cranberry Nutrition: An A Z Guide. Joan R. Davenport Soil Scientist Washington State University

Lime Fertilizer Interactions Affecting Vegetable Crop Production' Delbert D. Hemphill, Jr., and T. L. ABSTRACT

Investigating the probable cause of crop decline in central Oahu A.P. Pant, N.V. Hue, J. Uyeda, J. Sugano, and T. Radovich

G.J.B.B., VOL.1 (2) 2012: ISSN

Effect of organics and inorganic phosphorus on inorganic P-fractions in soil of soy bean (Glycine max L.) crop

5. Plant Physiology/Chemistry Section

Multi-K. Potassium Nitrate Products For Healthy Crops

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED

Sulphur Fertilizer Effect on Crop Development & Quality

BOTANY AND PLANT GROWTH Lesson 9: PLANT NUTRITION. MACRONUTRIENTS Found in air and water carbon C oxygen hydrogen

AZOMITE and Coffee & Cacao

SOILS AND PLANT NUTRITION

Welcome. Greg Patterson C.C.A. President A&L Canada Laboratories

FROM SOIL ELEMENTS TO FOOD NUTRIENTS: Joyce Kinabo Dept. of Food Science and Technology, Sokoine University, Tanzania

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci (2016) 5(5):

Fertility management in soybean

Plants, soil, and nutrients. Created in partnership with Alex Lindsey, Ph.D., The Ohio State University

Preventing, diagnosing and understanding nutrient deficiencies in plants

ABSTRACT. Emmanuel Ibukunoluwa Moyin-Jesu

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

Soybean Nutrient Profile

Utilization of Slop Ash as a Source of Potassium for Corn Grown on the Pakchong Soil Series

Quality and yield of Indian mustard genotypes as influenced by different fertility levels

Role of Potassium and Sulphur on the Growth, Yield and Oil Content of Soybean (Glycine max L.)

Mineral Nutrition of Fruit & Nut Trees. Fruit & Nut Tree Nutrition 3/1/2013. Johnson - Nutrition 1

Animal, Plant & Soil Science. D3-7 Characteristics and Sources of Secondary Nutrients and Micronutrients

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Volume 2, No 2, Copyright 2010 All rights reserved Integrated Publishing Association

Principles of Orchard Nutrition. Kevin Manning and Ross Wilson AgFirst

Potash Phosphate Nitrogen

Fertilizer. Fertilizers. (FAO press release, April 1990): Nutrient Depletion. Nutrient Depletion 4/16/2012

(39) INOCULATION OF RHIZOBIUM JAPONICUM AND β- SITOSTEROL EFFECT ON GROWTH, YIELD AND SOME BIOCHEMICAL CONSTITUENTS OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max L.

Response of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Levels on Linseed (Linum usitatissimum L.)

Trends in Micro-Nutrient Soil Test Levels in Saskatchewan Pat Flaten, PAg 1, Brandon Green, PAg 2, Paul Routledge, PAg 3

Plant, Soil, and Nutrients

Soil fertility status and nutrient recommendations based on soil analysis of Jaisalmer district of western Rajasthan

Discuss the importance of healthy soils Soil properties, physical, chemical and biological that one can manage for soil health How organics play a

REMEMBER as we go through this exercise: Science is the art of making simple things complicated!

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

Effect of nitrogen released from rumen digesta and cow dung on soil and leaf nutrient content of Gboma (Solanum macrocarpon L.)

Understanding a Soil Report

How to Develop a Balanced Program for Pecan and Chili. Robert R Smith

Received: 4 th April-2014 Revised: 24 th May-2014 Accepted: 26 th May-2014 Research article

Interpreting Plant Tissue and Soil Sample Analysis

ADVANCING CORN YIELDS. Sulf-N Ammonium Sulfate

Effect of FYM, biofertilizers and zinc on phosphorus uptake by maize

Importance of fertigation scheduling

EVALUATION OF THE LEAF NITRATE, NITRATE REDUCTASE ACTIVITY AND PROTEIN IN AMARANTHUS HYBRIDUS L. AND AMARANTHUS SPINOSUS I.

Influence of High-P-Chelated Micronutrients on Nutrient Uptake of Chickpea Under Vertisols

SOIL TEST INTERPRETATION JIM FASCHING Technical Field Representative

EFFECT OF SOIL AND FOLIAR APPLICATIONS OF ZINC AND IRON ON THE YIELD AND QUALITY OF ONION (Allium cepa L.) Abstract

Fluid Sources for Micronutrients Starters for No-Tillage Corn and Soybean in Argentina. Ricardo Melgar

MAGIC RECIPES? Strawberry Fertigation in the UK. John Atwood Senior Horticultural Consultant.

Effect of High-P-Chelated Micronutrient Foliar Spray on Yield and Quality of Chickpea

Interpretation of Soil Tests for Environmental Considerations

FERTILIZING. Correct time is during October and November. Sample young, fully developed, hardened off leaves.

Estimating Micronutrient Status and their Relationship with Other Soil Properties of Rewa District in Fiji

RESPONSE OF BIO FERTILIZERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH INORGANIC FERTILIZERS IN KHARIF PADDY

Use of Vetiver Grass for Soil and Water Conservation in Nigeria

The 1 th International and The 4 th National Congress on Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture April 2012 in Isfahan, Iran

Bioavailability of Cd to Food Crops in

Innovations in fertilizers to ensure food and nutrition security in China

Nutrition. Grain Legume Handbook

in a uniquely natural way.

1

SOIL AND PLANT NUTRITION

AUTHORS MWANSA MUKUKA DR. CHISHALA BENSON H. DR. MUTITI SAMUEL DR. UCHIDA YOSHITAKA APPSA CONFERENCE 6 TH NOVEMBER, 2017

DAFFODILS ARE WHAT THEY EAT: NUTRITIONAL ASPECTS OF SOILS

Soil fertility and fertilizers for wild blueberry production

Limus The best urea protection for optimal plant nutrition

Recommended Resources: The following resources may be useful in teaching this lesson:

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Soil Fertility and Nutrient Management. Hailin Zhang. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Using the double pot technique to detect nutrient limitations for soybean growth (Glycine max) in Sierra Leonean soils

EFFECT OF COPPER LEVELS ON COPPER CONTENT IN SOIL NUTRIENT UPTAKE AND YIELD OF SOYBEAN (GLYCINE MAX) VARIETIES

Materials and Methods Field layout and agronomy of the study, nutrient analyses, and statistical analysis is as described in Oyetunji et al.

Effect of N, Zn and Fe application on N, P, K content and total uptake in parmal rice (Oryza sativa L.)

VOL. 5, NO. 6, June 2015 ISSN ARPN Journal of Science and Technology All rights reserved.

Effect of NPK and Humic Substance Applications on Vegetative Growth of Egazy Olive Seedlings

INTRODUCTION TO VISCOFOL. Revolutionary high viscosity foliar feeds

Kinetics of decomposition of wheat straw and mineralisation of micronutrients in zinc-treated rice field

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Soil Testing Options in High Tunnels. Bruce Hoskins University of Maine anlab.umesci.maine.edu

Influence of Different Planting Material and Major Nutrient Application on Yield Attributes of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

Effect of Micronutrients Application on Availability of Zn, Fe and B of Sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) in Inceptisol

A fertiliser is a chemical compound that is given to a plant to promote growth.

RESPONSE OF GROUNDNUT (ARACHIS HYPOGAEA L.) TO BALANCED FERTILIZATION UNDER SUB-HUMID SOUTHERN PLAIN ZONE OF RAJASTHAN

Biosolids Nutrien Management an Soil Testing. Craig Cogger, Soil Scientis WSU Puyallup

Plant Nutrients: N, P, K. Martha E. Rosemeyer Ecological Agriculture February 17, 2006

Transcription:

International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research Vol.1 (9), pp. 277-287, November 2013 Available online at http://journalissues.org/journals/ijapr/ 2013 Journal Issues ISSN 2350-1561 Original Research Paper Effect of maize - stover compost and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril.) Accepted 29 October,2013 1* Adeyeye, A.S., 2 Togun, A.O., 3 Akanbi, W.B. and 1 Ahuchaogu, C.E. 1Federal University, Wukari Taraba State. Nigeria. 2University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State, Nigeria. 3Ladoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso. Oyo State. Nigeri *Coresponding author. E-mail: solorach2002@yahoo.com Tel.: +2348035531840 Dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake of soybean in response to application of maize stover compost and nitrogen fertilizer were investigated. The three factor consisted of three compost rates (0, 2 and 4t/ha), three N levels (0, 30 and 60kgN/ha) and three soybean varieties (TGx1740-2F, TGx1842-1E and TGx1448-2E). The resulting 27 treatment combinations were laid out in randomized complete block design replicated three times. Data were collected on dry weights of root, stem and leaves and on plant nutrient uptake (major and minor nutrients) which were analyzed using DMRT at 5% level of probability. Leaf dry matter increased from 6 to 10 weeks after planting (WAP) and declined thereafter. The variety TGx 1448-2E had the highest leaf dry weight (4.0g) per plant followed by TGx 1842-1E (3.7g/plt) and TGx 1740-2F had the least (2.3g). Varying levels of N fertilizer had no significant (P>0.05) influence in leaf dry matter accumulation. However, highest leaf dry weight per plant (3.5g) was observed in plots fertilized with 30 kgn/ha. Application of compost had significant effect on stem dry weight except at 6WAP. Variety TGx 1842-1E had the best root dry matter weight per plant (2.2g). Application of 2 or 4t/ha compost had similar root dry matter value of 1.5g per plant which was significantly better than 1.1g per plant of non -fertilized plants. Effect of variety was highly significant on N, Ca, Mg, Zn, and Fe but not on P, K and Cu uptake and TGx1448-2E performed best. Nitrogen application rates of 60kgN/ha improved uptake of macro and micro nutrients by the plant (p<0.05) Also compost at 4t/ha had significant effect on all the nutrients assessed. The 2-way and 3-way interactive effects of variety, N-fertilizer and compost rate were highly significant in N, P, Ca, Mg, Cu and Fe uptake by soybean. The interactive effect of variety and nitrogen fertilizer was significant on the uptake of all the mineral nutrients assessed with exception of K and Zn. Uptake of N was highest with TGx 1448-2E when fertilized with 30kg/ha urea. Key words: Soybean, compost, mineral fertilizer, nutrient uptake INTRODUCTION Soybean (Glycine max (L) Merril), is an important legume and oilseed crop which provides cheap and balanced diet (Ogundipe et al., 1989). The crop has been described as the world s chief source of edible vegetable oil and high protein feed for livestock (Dashiell, 1993). It can be compared favorably with animal protein sources and contains the entire essential amino acids required by human being. (Oyenuga 1968, Amon. 1987). The protein yield of soybean on dry matter basis is about twice that of meat, and of most beans and nuts, and four time that of milk. In southwestern Nigeria, soybean seed residue is used as substitute to melon as part of soup ingredients (Dashiell, 1993).

Int. J. Agric. Policy Res. 278 One of the major problems associated with soybeans in tropical ecology is poor soil fertility (Daramola et al., 2009). This is due to intensive cropping system, which has now become a characteristics feature of Nigerian s arable agriculture. The practice depletes soil nutrients over short period of time as a result of continuous cropping on the same piece of land (Akintokun et al., 2003). There is a need to maintain fertility of arable field in order to enhance its productivity. Therefore, soil fertility and productivity can be maintained through the use of fertilizers (inorganic and organic) among other strategies. Soybean production is increasing in tropical African countries like Nigeria, Ghana, Zambia and Zaire etc. where the crop is grown by small holders as either mono crop or intercrop with maize, cassava using single super phosphate (Dashiell, 1993). Soil that supplies both ammonium (NH4 + ) and nitrate (N0 3 -) in combination provide better nourishment needed to enhance crop growth performance when compared to soil that supplies N0 3 - or NH 4 + alone to crop. (Halving et al., 2005). It would suffice to imply that a combination of the inorganic and organic manures would apparently provide the two ions at different growth phases of the crop. The use of chemical fertilizer by small holders is drastically impaired due to scarcity and higher cost (Akanbi et al., 2001 ). Also among Nigerian resource-poor farmers, the inorganic fertilizers are rarely adequate and timely available (Adedoyin, 1995). Little information, however is available on the nature of the response of soybean crop to combined application of N and compost with regard to dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake. Hence this study was designed to investigate the effect of maize-stover compost and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake in soybean. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was carried out at the Teaching and Research Farm, Babcock University Ilisan-Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria during the growing seasons of 2009 and 2010. The land used for the trial was ploughed and harrowed. Preliminary investigation was carried out on the soil samples collected randomly and the physical and chemical composition determined (IITA, 1990). The tested treatments are: three compost rates (0, 2 and 4 t/ha), three levels of N-fertilizer (0,30 and 60 kg N/ha) and three varieties of soybean : TGx 1740-2F, TGx 1842-1E and TGx 1448-2E) The experiment was 3 3 factorial with 27 treatment combinations each replicated three times using a randomized complete block design. The soybean seeds were planted manually using 60cm x 5cm spacing in 3m x2m plots through drilling method of planting. Maize-stover compost was applied to each plot a week before planting and N-fertilizer in the form of urea two weeks after planting (WAP). Data collection commenced at two WAP and thereafter fortnightly for 12 weeks, four plants from the middle row of each plot were uprooted for data collection, the root was rinsed with water to remove soil from the plant. The plants were later separated into root, stem, leaves, flower and pod. The different plant parts were put into separate envelopes and oven dried at 80 C for 48 hours. The dry matter weight of each part was determined on a toploading balance. The dry matter were milled and assayed for %N while N uptake was estimated as N uptake = % N uptake x dry weight (Ombo, 1994). The data collected were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) while Duncan multiple range test (DMRT) was used to separate the mean at P 0.05. RESULTS The results of soil analysis showed that the soil at the experimental site had low nitrogen content, organic matter, organic carbon and ECEC while the textural class of the soil is sandy loam, suggesting that the fertility status of the soil was very low (Table 1). The effects of variety, N fertilizer and compost on dry matter accumulation by leaves soybean are presented in (Table 2 and Figure 1). Leaf dry matter increased with increase in age of the crop till 10 WAP and then declined thereafter. There was significant difference in dry weight of leaves of the three soybean cultivars. At 10WAP, TGX 1448 2E had the highest leaf dry weight (4.0g) while the least (2.3g) was obtained with TGX 1842-1E. There was no significant differences on the leaf dry matter accumulation among the three levels of N fertilizer but in spite of this, application of Nitrogen at 30 and 60kgN/ha produced better results over non-fertilized control plant (Table 2). Compost application had significant influence on soybean leaf dry weight at 10 and 12WAP. Highest dry leaf (3.9g) was observed in plots fertilized with 4t/ha compost but this was not significantly different from our observation in plots fertilized with 2t/ha.. There was significant interactive effects of variety, N- fertilizer and compost rates on soybean leaf dry weight. Interaction between soybean varieties and levels of N fertilizer, soybean varieties and compost levels significantly influenced leaf dry matter production (Table 2). Partitioning of dry matter into the stem increased with increase in the age of the crop. Dry matter accumulation inthe stem of soybean varied significantly among the three Varieties. TGx 1842 1E had the highest values althrough the sampling periods while TGx 1740 2F accumulated the least dry matter in the stem (Table 3). Application of nitrogen fertilizer had no significant effect on the stem dry weight at all sampling periods except at 12WAP. At this sampling period, highest stem dry matter was observed in plots fertilized with 30 kgn/ha while least stem dry matter was recorded in the control plots. Similarly, compost application had significant effect on stem dry weight at 8, 10 and 12 WAP and the effects of application of 2 and 4 t

Adeyeye et al. 279 Table 1. Pre cropping soil chemical and physical analysis of experimental soil of Ilishan- Remo, Ogun State, Nigeria Properties Value ph (H20) 5.8 Organic Carbon (%) 0.55 Total N (%) 0.03 Available P (ppm) 0.68 Fe (mg / kg) 9.16 Cu (mg / kg) 1.20 Zn (mg / kg) 5.12 Exchangeable K (c mol /kg) 0.21 Exchangeable Na (c mol /kg) - Exchangeable Ca (c mol /kg) 0.8 Exchangeable Mg (c mol /kg) 0.05 Exchangeable Acidity (c mol /kg) - E C E C (c mol /kg) 1.06 Base saturation (g/kg) 926 Sand (g / kg) 950 Silt (g / kg) 120 Clay (g / kg) 12 Textural Class Loam sand Table 2. Summary of ANOVA for the effect of variety, fertilizer and compost on soybean dry weight components at different ages. Source of variation df Leaf dry weight Stem dry weight Root dry weight Pod dry weight 10WAP 12WAP 10WAP 12WAP SWAP - Means square Variety (V) 2 10.9** 7.5** 31** 0.06ns 1.29** 2 1.64ns 3.3ns 1.0ns 0.17ns 0.07* 2 5.9** 4.9* 3.8** 0.78** 0.03ns 4 2.1ns 3.2* 0.6ns 0.2Ins 0.03ns 4 5.2** 2.7ns 1.9* 0.16ns 0.18** 4 0.8ns 2.0ns 0.5ns 0.31ns 0.02ns 8 1.4ns 1.0ns 0.9ns 0.37* 0.04ns 54 1.4 1.3 0.6 0.20 0.02 *, ** = Significant at 5 and 1% probability levels respectively; ns = not significant at 5% probability level. /ha compost were not significantly different (Table 2 and 3). The effect of compost treatments on the partitioning of dry matter into the root of soybean presented in Figure 2. Dry matter partitioning into root of the crop increased with increase in age of the plant up to 10WAP before declining at 12 WAP. TGx 1448-2E had significantly highest root dry matter but not significantly different from root dry matter obtained in TGx 1842. TGX1742-1E had the least root dry matter. Compost application produced significant effect on root dry matter production at 10 and 12WAP (Figure 2). Application of 2 and 4t/ha compost yield the same root dry matter of 1.5g/plant which is significantly higher than 1.1g/plant produced by non-fertilized plants.there were no significant interactive effects on soybean root dry matter partitioning at 12WAP as show in (Table 2) The effect of variety on both the flower and pod dry weights was significant (Figure 3 and 4). Variety TGx 1448 2E had the highest flower dry weight while TGx 1842-1E and TGx 1742-F had values that are statistically similar. The variety TGx 1842-1E also had the best pod dry weight of (19.7g) followed by TGx 1742 F (17.66g) while the least pod dry weight of 9.7g was observed with TGx 1448-2E (Figure 4). N-fertilizer application significantly affected flower dry matter yield at 6 and 10 WAP where 30 and 60 kgn/ha rates performed better than the control. Pod dry matter increased linearly with increasing in N-level reaching maximum at 60 kgn/ha. The use of compost produced no effect on flower dry matter yield at all sampling periods, while at 10 and 12 WAP compost application had significant effect on pod dry matter yield. At both the periods, application of 2 and 4t/ha compost gave

Int. J. Agric. Policy Res. 280 Figure 1: Effects of variety and compost rates on soybean leaf dry matter at different ages. comparable pod dry matter yield which was significantly higher than no compost application (Table 4) Nutrient uptake Effect of variety was highly significant on N, Ca, Mg, Zn and Fe uptake, but not on P, K, and Cu uptake. Application of nitrogen fertilizer was significant on the uptake of macro and micro nutrients considered and in most cases, uptake values obtained with 30 and 60 kgn/ha treatments were not significant but significantly higher than when no N was applied. Similarly, the main effect of compost rate was significant on all the nutrients assessed. In most cases application of 2 and 4 t. /ha had similar effects, and these treatments performed better than 0t/ha (control) (Table 5 and 7 ).The first- and the second-order interaction effects of variety, N fertilizer and compost rate were highly significant on uptake of N, P, Ca, Mg, Cu, and Fe by soybean ( Table 8). The variety x nitrogen interactions were significant on the uptake of the assessed nutrients of K and Zn (Table 8, ). Uptake of N was highest with TGx 1448-2E when fertilized with 30 kg N/ha. This is similar and closely followed by TGx 1842-IE and TGx 1740-2F fertilized with 60 kg N /ha(table 5). In the same vein, the uptake of P, Ca, Mg, Cu and Fe were highest with TGx 1842-IE x 60 kg N /ha, TGx

Adeyeye et al. 281 Table 3.Main Effects of variety, fertilizer and compost on soybean stem dry weight (g /plant) at different ages. Treatment 6 8 10 12 Weeks after Planting Variety TGX 1448-2E 0.6 2.0 2.4 2.6 TGX1842-1E 0.7 1.0 2.6 2.7 TGX 1740-2F 0.5 1.0 2.0 2.1 Prob. of F ns * * * LSD (5%) 0.19 0.24 0.43 0.47 Fertilizer level (kg / ha) 0 0.6 1.4 2.1 2.2 30 0.5 1.4 2.3 2.7 60 0.7 1.4 2.5 2.5 Prob. of F. ns Ns Ns ** LSD (5%) 0.19 0.24 0.43 0.47 Compost rate (t./ha) 0 0.6 1.2 1.9 2.1 2 0.7 1.3 2.4 2.5 4 0.6 1.6 2.6 2.7 Prob. of F. ns * * ** LSD (5%) 0.19 0.24 0.43 0.47 *, ** = Significant at 5 and 1% probability levels respectively; ns = not significant at 5% probability level. Figure 2: Effects of variety and compost rates on root dry matter weight at different ages. ns = not significant

Int. J. Agric. Policy Res. 282 Figure 3: Main effects of variety and N-fertilizer on soyabean flower dry matter weight (g /plant) at different ages. Figure 4: Main effects of variety, N -fertilizer and Compost rates on soyabean pod dry weight at different ages. ns = not significant

Adeyeye et al. 283 Table 4. Main effect of variety, fertilizer and compost on soybean flower and pod dry weight (g) at different ages Treatment Flower dry weight.(g./plant) Pod dry weight (g. /plant) 4 6 8 10 12 Weeks after planting Variety TGx 1448-2E 0.6 0.2 0.2 2.7 9.7 TGX 1842- IE 0.1 0.1 1.1 7.1 19.7 TGX 1740-2F 0.1 0.1 2.3 4.3 17.6 Prob. of F ** ** * ** ** LSD (5%) 0.39 0.05 0.28 0.95 2.82 Fertilizer level (kg / ha) 0 0.6 0.1 1.1 4.2 14.4 30 0.1 0.1 1.3 5.2 14.3 60 0.1 0.1 1.1 4.7 18.4 Prob. of F. ** ns ns ns ** LSD (5%) 0.34 0.05 0.28 0.95 2.82 Compost rate (t. /ha) 0 0.1 0.1 1.1 3.7 13.0 2 0.1 0.1 1.1 5.3 15.8 4 0.4 0.1 1.3 5.1 18.2 Prob. of F. ns ns Ns *# ## LSD (5%) 0.39 0.05 0.28 0.95 2.82 *, ** - Significant at 5 and 1% probability levels respectively; ns = not significant at 5% probability level. Table.5 Interaction of variety and nitrogen fertilizer on uptake of macro and micro nutrients by soybean Variety Nitrogen level (kg /ha) Nitrogen level (kg /ha) 0 30 60 0 30 60 N uptake Mg uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.51 0.61 0.46 0.37 0.27 0.42 TGX 1842- IE 0.43 0.51 0.55 0.36 0.25 0.39 TGX1740-2F 0.46 0.48 0.56 0.32 0.27 0.38 LSD (5%) 0.09 0.1 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.03 P uptake Cu uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.28 0.11 0.34 13.1 9.7 15.8 TGX 1842-1 E 0.24 0.11 0.36 13.5 9.8 15.4 TGX 1742- IE 0.23 0.15 0.33 12.2 12.7 14.7 LSD (5%) 0.09 0.1 0.09 0.02 0.02 0.03 Ca uptake Fe uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.63 0.52 0.82 485.9 399.7 473.6 TGX 1842- IE 0.65 0.45 0.79 412.1 377.3 454.1 TGX 1740-2F 0.62 0.51 0.78 429.4 387.8 438.8 LSD (5%) 0.09 0.1 0.79 0.02 0.02 0.03 1448-2E x 60 kg N /ha and TGx 1740-2F x 0 kg N /ha, respectively.for variety by compost rate interactions, TGx 1842-IE x 2 t /ha interaction gave the highest N uptake of 0.66 g/ plant. This is closely followed by 0.65 g /plant obtained with TGx 1742-IE x 2 t /ha. For P and Ca uptake, interaction of TGx 1448-2E x 4 t /ha and TGx 1740-2F x 4 t /ha, respectively had the highest value. The interaction of variety and compost had significant effects on Mg, Cu and Fe uptake (Figure 5). These nutrients were highest with TGx 1448-2E x 2 t, TGx 1740-2F x 4 t and TGx 1448-2E x 4 t, respectively (Table 6).Uptake of N, P, K, Ca and Mg were significantly influenced by interactive effects of N fertilizer and compost rates (Table 8). The highest uptake of N (0.75 g /kg), P (0.46 g/kg) and K (0.85 g 7kg) were realized with 60 kg N x 0 t /ha compost, 60 kg N x 2 t /ha and 0 kg N x 4 t /ha compost, respectively. It was the 60 kg N x 0 t /ha compost combination that produced the best Ca uptake while Mg was at highest with 30 kg N x 2 t./ha compost combination. For

Int. J. Agric. Policy Res. 284. Figure 5: Interactive effects of N-level and compost rates on soyabean Cu, Zn and Fe uptake most of the results, application of 60 kg N /ha, or 4t /ha compost alone or combination of 30 kg N and 2 t /ha compost produced similar results. (Table 8) DISCUSSION Dry matter productions were markedly influenced by the applied treatments on soybean. The variety TGx 1448-2E accumulated more dry matter than the other two varieties in this study. This indicates that TGx 1448-2E had the potential for better capturing and utilization of solar radiation. The dry matter partitioning into the stem, root, and leaves increased with compost rate. Generally the maximum vegetative dry matter production was obtained at 10 WAP and 12 WAP for all the varieties tested. During these periods, the highest dry matter was obtained at 4t/ha compost rate. The non significance of 2 and 4t/la compost

Adeyeye et al. 285 Table 6. Interaction of variety and compost rate on uptake of macro and micro nutrients by soybean Variety Compost rates (t /ha) Compost rates(t. /ha) 0 2 4 0 2 4 N uptake Mg uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.65 0.56 0.37 0.31 0.39 0.36 TGX 1842- IE 0.53 0.66 0.30 0.30 0.35 0.35 TGX1740-2F 0.54 0.65 0.30 0.27 0.34 0.36 LSD (5%) 0.11 0.1 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 P uptake Cu uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.23 0.24 0.27 14.06 12.56 12.06 TGX 1842-1 E 0.24 0.19 0.26 13.81 11.53 13.35 TGX 1740-2F 0.25 0.21 0.25 12.54 12.19 14.87 LSD (5%) 0.11 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 Ca uptake Fe uptake TGX 1448-2E 0.59 0.68 0.70 417.61 468.29 473.3 TGX 1842- IE 0.62 0.64 0.67 384.94 441.70 416.82 TGX 1740-2F 0.58 0.62 0.71 374.12 437.30 444.54 LSD (5%) 0.11 0.10 0.03 0.04 0.04 0.02 Table 7. Interaction of nitrogen and compost on uptake of macro nutrients by soybean Nitrogen level (kg/ha Compost rate (t / ha) 0 2 4 N uptake (g /kg) 0 0.42 0.72 0.25 30 0.55 0.72 0.32 60 0.75 0.42 0.39 LSD (5%) 0.01 P uptake 0 0.17 0.33 0.25 30 0.09 0.15 0.12 60 0.46 0.16 0.40 LSD (5%) 0.02 K uptake 0 0.17 0.41 0.85 30 0.25 2.26 0.75 60 0.44 0.31 0.46 LSD (5%) 0.17 Ca uptake 0 0.60 0.67 0.63 30 0.29 0.57 0.66 60 0.91 0.69 0.80 LSD (5%) 0.02 Mg uptake 0 0.37 0.35 0.33 30 0.12 0.82 0.35 60 0.40 0.41 0.39 LSD (5%) 0.02 rates implied that optimum crop performance can be obtained at 2t/ha. This supported the report of Togun and Akanbi, (2003) that adequate supply of plant nutrients enhanced greater biomass production and partitioning into the economic yield of plant. The interaction of N and compost rates was not significant on dry matter at 10 WAP (stem dry weight), 12 WAP (leaf and root dry weight) and 12WAP (Pod dry weight). But there was no significant effect during the early growth of the plants. This agrees with the reports of Adetunji (1997) and Abad et al., (1997), that application of compost at low levels augments the efficiency of the

Int. J. Agric. Policy Res. 286 Table 8. Summary of ANOVA for effect of variety, nitrogen fertilizer and compost rates of uptake of macro and micro nutrients Variety N P K Ca Mg Cu Zn Fe Variety (V) 145.2** 0.86ns 0.9ns 5.25** 76.61** 2.0ns 47.1** 29.9** Nitrogen (N) 123.8** 390.7** 40.6** 700.5** 1498.4** 335.6** 304.8** 84.9** Compost (C) 2493.4** 17.3** 36.6** 71.9** 411.9** 39.0** 409.7** 67.1** V*N 129.7** 6.91** 1.69ns4.1** 27.4** 38.4** 3.4ns 64.3** V*C 136.5** 6.91** 0.56ns6.5** 23.3** 29.8** 7.3** 27.5** N*C 914.8** 166.5** 40.6** 239.4** 671.7** 216.4** 833.9** 39.2** V*N*C 178.6** 4.1** 1.25ns2.92* 18.0** 43.0** 7.01** 19.8** *, ** = Significant at 5 and 1% probability levels respectively; ns =not significant at 5% probability level minerals fertilizer when both fertilizers were applied together. Compost application produced better root dry weight than N-fertilizer application and the control (nofertilizer).this may be due to the release of other nutrient elements apart from Nitrogen by the compost such as macro element like P,K Ca, Mg and micro elements like Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn contrary to the supply of only Nitrogen by urea fertilizer (Ayeni,2011 ) The variety TGx 1448-2E produced high flower and pod dry weights than other varieties tested. This again proved the superiority of this variety with the ability to translocate more photosyntates into the reproductive zone for pod formation. Nitrogen fertilizer increased flower and pod dry matter yield at 12 WAP while there was no effect with compost treatments. This results confirms the work of Maheshbabu,et al.,2007 who reported that compost manure acts as nutrients reservoir and release nutrients slowly during the entire growth period of the crop plant and later produced better yield. The effect of variety was highly significant on N, Ca, Mg, Zn and Fe, but not on P and Cu uptake. There was no significant difference between TGx 1842 1E and TGx 1742-2F in respect to nitrogen uptake, while TGx 1448-2E showed significant difference between TGx 1842-1E and TGx 1742-2F. This also demonstrates the superiority of TGx 1448-2E over other varieties in the ability of higher nitrogen uptake. Nitrogen application rates also showed significant different between the nutrient uptake of soybean plant. Application of 60kg N/ha was significantly having higher values in term of Ca, N, Mg, Cu. And Fe while Zero application was the least. But there was no significant difference between the application rates of 30 and 60kg N/ha which were better than zero rates. This shows the importance of nitrogen nutrients in the proper growth and development of the plants. Compost application significantly affected soybean nutrient uptake at all stages of growth. And in most cases nutrient uptake increase with increase compost rates up to 4t/ha. This is said to be adequate for soybean production because when compost is added to the soil in large quality there is tendency to increase the C content of the soil which will result in higher C: N ratio which according to White and Marinakis (1991) causes immobilization of N and slows down decomposition and mineralization rates. The twoway and three-way interactive effect as was observed from the results showed that interactive effect was significant on N, P, Ca, Mg, Cu and Fe, while variety by compost (VxC) interactive effect was significant only on N, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn and Fe except for K. however for (NxC) interactions was significant on all the plant properties with the exception of K. this makes more nutrients to be available and hence improved productivity. Conclusion Application of N-fertilizer and compost improved the dry mater yield of soybean plants. N-fertilizer level of 30 kg N/ha is optimum for improved dry matter production while application of 2t/ha compost is adequate for dry matter yield production of soybean crops. Also for effective nutrient uptake in soybean, application of 30 kg N/ha and also 4t/ha compost are adequate. REFERENCES Abad BB, Clement MD, Aragan BY, Camarero KS (1997). The influence of urban waste compost and nitrogen mineral fertilizer on growth and productivity in potatoes. Commun. Sci.. Soil Plant Anal. 28(17-18): 1653-1661. Adedoyin SF (1995). An assessment of the linkage in the delivery of technologies on rehabilitation and management of soil in Ogun State, Nigeria. Paper presented at the 3 rd all African soil science conference, University of Ibadan.Ibadan. pp. 19-26. Adetunji MT (1997). Organic residue management soil nutrient changes and maize yield in a humid Ultisol. Nutrient Cycling in Agro ecosystem, 47:189-195. Akanbi WB, Adediran JA,Togun AO (2001). Effect of organic based fertilizer and age at transplanting on shoot yield and shoot protein content of Solanum microcarpon

Adeyeye et al. 287 (L).Biosci. Res. Commun., 3(1): 1-8. Akintokun OO,Adetunji MT,Akintokun PO (2003). Phosphorus availability to soybean from an indigenous phosphate rock sample in soil from southwest Nigeria. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem, 65:35-41. Amon BOE (1987). Soybean utilization in Nigeria. Proceeding of the training workshop on soybeanutilization. Home economics series 4,Agric Extention Research Liaison Service,Zaira Ahmadu Bello University, Zaira, Nigeria. Ayeni LS (2011). Cumulative effect of sole and combined cocoa pod ash,poultry manure and NPK 20 10 10 fertilizer on major cations release for crop production in south western Nigeria. Int. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Soil Sci., 1(7): 248-253. Daramola DS,Adeyeye AS,Lawal DA (2009). Effect of different organic nutrient sources on the growth and dry matter yield of amaranthus (Amaranthus cruentus) Acta Satech 3(1): 1-6. Dashiell KE (1993).Soybean production and utilization in Nigeria. A paper presented at the National workshop on small scale and industrial level processing of soybean held at IITA, Ibadan, July. Havlin JL, Beato JD, Tisadale SL, Nelson WL (2005). Soil fertility and Fertilizers An Introduction to Nutrient Management. 7 th Edition. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. IITA (1990). Selected Methods for Soil and Plant Analysis. Manual series No.1. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, Oyo Road Ibadan, Nigeria. pp. 1-68. Maheshbabu HM, Ravs H, Biradar NK, Babalad HB (2007) Effects of organic manure on plant growth seed yield and quality of soybean. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci. 21(2):219-221. Ogundipe HO, Dashiell KE, S.M, Osho (1989). Soymilk yield and quality as affected by soybean varieties and processing technique. Tropical Legume Bull.,P. 38. Ombo FI (1994). Self sufficiency in local fertilizer production for Nigeria. In proc. 3 rd African Soil Science Society Conference, Ibadan. pp. 112-114. Oyenuga VA (1968).Nigerian feeds and feeding stuffs. Composition and nutritive value..3 rd Edition.Ibadan University Press. Oyo State, Nigeria. P.60 Togun AO, Akanbi WB (2003). Comparative effectiveness of organic based fertilizer to mineral fertilizer on tomato growth and fruit yield. Compost Sci. Util., 11(4): 337-342. Cite this article as: Adeyeye AS, Togun AO, Akanbi WB, Ahuchaogu CE (2013). Effect of maize - stover compost and nitrogen fertilizer on dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merril.) Int. J. Agric. Policy Res.1(9):277-287