Results of the Determination of Serum Markers in Patients with Malignant Melanoma

Similar documents
PREDICTION OF METASTATIC DISEASE BY COMPUTER AIDED INTERPRETATION OF TUMOUR MARKERS IN PATIENTS WITH MALIGNANT MELANOMA: A FEASIBILITY STUDY

PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS IN MELANOMA

Serum S100B and LDH Are Not Useful in Predicting the Sentinel Node Status in Melanoma Patients

Citation for published version (APA): Francken, A. B. (2007). Primary and metastatic melanoma: aspects of follow-up and staging s.n.

Health and Economic Burden of Skin Melanoma in Croatia Cost-of-illness Study

Melanoma Inhibiting Activity Protein (MIA), Beta-2 Microglobulin and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) in Metastatic Melanoma

Comparison of Two Prognostic Markers for Malignant Melanoma: MIA and S100 ß

Follow-up investigations. Omgo E. Nieweg

WHAT DOES THE PATHOLOGY REPORT MEAN?

THE ROLE OF CONTEMPORARY IMAGING AND HYBRID METHODS IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT MELANOMA(CMM) AND MERKEL CELL CARCINOMA (MCC)

Usefulness of serum 5-S-cysteinyl-dopa as a biomarker for predicting prognosis and

Cutaneous malignant melanoma (MM) incidence has

GUIDELINES ON RENAL CELL CANCER

Clinico-pathological Features of Patients with Melanoma and Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy: A Single Institution Experience

Uncommon secondary tumour of the stomach

UK CAA Oncology Certification Charts

Springer Healthcare. Staging and Diagnosing Cutaneous Melanoma. Concise Reference. Dirk Schadendorf, Corinna Kochs, Elisabeth Livingstone

Melanoma: The Basics. What is a melanocyte?

Breast Cancer Staging

Case Scenario 1 Worksheet. Primary Site C44.4 Morphology 8743/3 Laterality 0 Stage/ Prognostic Factors

FDG PET/CT STAGING OF LUNG CANCER. Dr Shakher Ramdave

Translating Evidence into Practice: Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Guidelines. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

SAMPLING OF POST NEPHRECTOMY CANCER CARE (5)

Work-up/Follow-up: Baseline and Surveillance Studies for Cutaneous Melanoma Patients

Elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate is associated with metastatic disease and worse survival in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma

SUBUNGUAL MALIGNANT MELANOMA ON THE RIGHT INDEX IN A DENTIST AFTER PROLONGED OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE TO X-RAYS

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF SERUM S100, MIA AND LDH IN CUTANEOUS MALIGNANT MELANOMA

Subject Index. Dry desquamation, see Skin reactions, radiotherapy

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Cutaneous malignant melanoma: clinical and histopathological review of cases in a Malaysian tertiary referral centre

STAGING AND FOLLOW-UP STRATEGIES

Alison Douglass Gillian Lieberman, MD. November. Colon Cancer. Alison Douglass, Harvard Medical School Year III Gillian Lieberman, MD

performed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.

North of Scotland Cancer Network Clinical Management Guideline for Malignant Melanoma

Cancers of unknown primary : Knowing the unknown. Prof. Ahmed Hossain Professor of Medicine SSMC

Talk to Your Doctor. Fact Sheet

RT-PCR for tyrosinase expression as a molecular marker in malignant melanoma

Soft Tissue Sarcoma Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging

Genetic Testing: When should it be ordered? Julie Schloemer, MD Dermatology

Melanoma Quality Reporting

ARTICLE. Imaging of metastatic melanoma

GUIDELINES ON TESTICULAR CANCER

Prognosis for metastatic breast cancer to bones

Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging of Ewing Tumors

CT PET SCANNING for GIT Malignancies A clinician s perspective

When Do I Consider Myself Cured?

An Overview of Melanoma. Harriet Kluger, M.D. Associate Professor Section of Medical Oncology Yale Cancer Center

PET imaging of cancer metabolism is commonly performed with F18

MUSCLE - INVASIVE AND METASTATIC BLADDER CANCER

Specialist Referral Service Willows Information Sheets. Cancer in cats and dogs: Assessment of the patient

Radiological staging of lung cancer. Shukri Loutfi,MD,FRCR Consultant Thoracic Radiologist KAMC-Riyadh

Michael T. Tetzlaff MD, PhD

Malignant Melanoma in Turkey: A Single Institution s Experience on 475 Cases

Doppler ultrasound of the abdomen and pelvis, and color Doppler

CODING STAGE: TNM AND OTHER STAGING SYSTEMS. Liesbet Van Eycken Otto Visser

Primary Cutaneous Melanoma Pathology Reporting Proforma DD MM YYYY. *Tumour site. *Specimen laterality. *Specimen type

SELF-ASSESSMENT MODULE REFERENCE SPR 2018 Oncologic Imaging Course Adrenal Tumors November 10, :00 12:10 p.m.

Gynecologic Cancer Surveillance and Survivorship: Informing Practice and Policy

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Updates on Melanoma: Are You Following the Latest Guidelines of Care? Jerry Brewer, MD

Index. pet.theclinics.com. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Louisa Fleure. Advanced Prostate Cancer Clinical Nurse Specialist. Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust

Update on RECIST and Staging of Common Pediatric Tumors Ethan A. Smith, MD

Case Scenario 1 Discharge Summary Pathology Report Final Diagnosis: Oncology Consult

Louisa Fleure. Advanced Prostate Cancer Clinical Nurse Specialist. Guys and St Thomas NHS Trust

Melanoma. Lynn Schuchter, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania

Kidney Cancer Early Detection, Diagnosis, and Staging

PET CT for Staging Lung Cancer

Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) Protocol

A fatal case of an adrenal gland melanoma with a mysterious primary lesion

Case Scenario 1 Discharge Summary Pathology Report Final Diagnosis: Oncology Consult

L impatto dell imaging sulla definizione della strategia terapeutica

Los Angeles Radiological Society 62 nd Annual Midwinter Radiology Conference January 31, 2010

Amelanotic melanoma of the skin detailed review of the problem

Exercise. Discharge Summary

Diagnosis and Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Carlos Eduardo Oliveira Baleeiro, MD. November 18, 2017

Disclosure. Acknowledgement. What is the Best Workup for Rectal Cancer Staging: US/MRI/PET? Rectal cancer imaging. None

GUIDELINES FOR CANCER IMAGING Lung Cancer

Causation Issues. Delay in Diagnosis of Cancer Cases. Prof Pat Price Imperial College London

Precision diagnostics for personalized melanoma care

PET IMAGING (POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPY) FACT SHEET

Different Types of Cancer

Low risk. Objectives. Case-based question 1. Evidence-based utilization of imaging in prostate cancer

The Itracacies of Staging Patients with Suspected Lung Cancer

CHAPTER 7 Concluding remarks and implications for further research

1. Written information to patient /GP: fax ASAP to GP & offer copy of consultation letter.

Supplementary appendix

Sentinel Node in Malignant Melanoma The Pathologist s Point of View

Melanoma Case Scenario 1

The 8th Edition Lung Cancer Stage Classification

Erythema Multiforme with Reference to Atypical Presentation in an HIV-Positive Patient Following Antiretroviral Therapy Discontinuation

Surgery for recurrent brain metastases

Quantification of Melanoma Micrometastases in Sentinel Lymph Nodes Using Real-Time RT-PCR

Staging Colorectal Cancer

Molecular Enhancement of Sentinel Node Evaluation

Response of Osteosarcoma to Chemotherapy in Scotland. Ewan Semple, 5 th Year Medical Student, University of Aberdeen

Surgical management and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III-IV ovarian cancer

GUIDELINES ON RENAL CELL CARCINOMA

Patient age and cutaneous malignant melanoma: Elderly patients are likely to have more aggressive histological features and poorer survival

Transcription:

Coll. Antropol. 31 (2007) Suppl. 1: 7 11 Original scientific paper Results of the Determination of Serum Markers in Patients with Malignant Melanoma Liborija Lugovi}, Mirna [itum, Marija Buljan, Sanja Poduje and Klaudija [ebeti} Department of Dermatology and Venereology, University Hospital»Sestre milosrdnice«, Zagreb, Croatia ABSTRACT Although there is no routine procedure for determination of serum markers in patients with malignant melanoma (MM), some markers are being studied as potentially useful prognostic tools. Serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), protein S-100B, melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA) and tyrosinase may correlate with melanoma progression. In this study, the results of determination of S100 protein, LDH, MIA and tyrosinase in the serum of 50 patients with MM (stages I-IV) were determined. The increased values of MIA were found in 26% patients in stage I, while in 5 patients in stage IV. Increased S-100 protein was found in 13% patients in stage I while in 5 patients in stage IV. The increased values of LDH were found in 26% patients in stage I, while in 25% patients in stage IV. The positive serum tyrosinase was noticed in 17.3% patients in stage II, while in 25% patients in stage IV. The obtained results have revealed no significant differences between the groups in higher and lower stages of the disease, indicating that blood markers are not reliable prognostic factors for MM progression. Key words: malignant melanoma, markers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), protein S-100, melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA), tyrosinase Introduction The serum markers in patients with malignant tumours, including malignant melanoma (MM), may be valuable in clinical diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of the disease and patients' response to therapy over time. The research data so far pointed out few blood markers as promising prognostic parameters in the detection of tumour progression. The most widely used serum markers are S-100, melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Different studies indicated close correlations between the serum concentrations of these and tumour load 1,2. Increased serum concentrations of these marker proteins being indicative of tumour growth 3,4, but they still cannot be used as an evidence of tumour progression. Until now there is no marker available to detect metastatic spread at an early stage in the progression of the disease. Laboratory tests and imaging procedures increase the probability of detecting occult metastases. The current treatment recommendations for the patients with MM, comprise various clinical and radiological examinations according to the stage of the disease (including chest x-rays, ultrasound of lymph nodes and abdomen, CT-, MRI- and PET scans). However, there is no unique consensus in clinical practice 5. Besides LDH, which is a leading blood parameter in patients with melanoma metastases, there are two serum proteins widely used in the follow-up of patients with MM; protein S-100, a member of the S-100 protein family, and melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA), which is a soluble protein 6. Increased levels of LDH in serum of melanoma patients were detected in 1954. Ever since the value of LDH as a tumour marker for MM has been discussed. LDH was reported to be an indicator for liver metastases, with high sensitivity and a specifity 5,7.Melanoma-inhibiting activity (MIA) is strongly expressed by malignant melanocytes while naevi show only moderate, low or no expression 1,2. The mature protein consists of 107 amino acids; its molecular weight is approximately 11 kd. MIA especially inhibits the attachment of melanoma cells to fibronectin and laminin, which leads to an increasing motility. Melanoma cells and mature chondrocytes express MIA whilst low levels of MIA-mRNA are found in various other cell types. In malignant tumours, Received for publication October 1, 2006 7

high MIA mrna levels were detected in almost 10 of MM samples. S-100 protein is an acid calcium-binding protein with a molecular weight of 21kd found in the nervous system of vertebrates. Its name derives from its solubility in 10 saturated ammonium sulphate at neutral ph. It is dimerous protein, consisting of two isomerous subunits; (MW 10.4 kd) and (MW 10.5 kd), whereby each of the possible combinations occurs. S-100 has been found in melanoma cells and is used for the immunohistochemical diagnosis of amelanotic melanomas. In the recent literature, serum S-100 was suggested as a serum marker for staging and monitoring therapy of patients with MM 1,2. It has been indicated that levels of S-100 as well as of MIA in peripheral blood, correlate with melanoma progression, demonstrating a higher sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy then other parameters in the diagnosis of newly occurring melanoma metastasis 1,8. Tyrosinase and tyrosinase-related protein-1 are enzymes involved in melanin synthesis and are specific to melanocytes and melanoma cells. Tyrosinase catalyses the oxidation of tyrosine to dopa and further to dopaquinone. Expression of the tyrosinase is confined to cells of the melanocitic lineage and Schwann cells. Determination of the serum concentration of tyrosinase may also be important marker in patients with MM. The aim of this study was to determine and compare levels of MIA, S-100 protein, LDH, and tyrosinase in the serum of patients with MM in different stages of disease, as well as to conclude whether these might be useful prognostic tools for MM progression. Materials and Methods In the present study, serum levels of MIA, S-100 protein, LDH, and tyrosinase were measured over a time period from 2002 to 2006. The markers in serum samples from 50 melanoma patients at different stages of disease were analyzed (Table 1). Diagnosis of MM was based on the histopathological examination of the surgically removed lesions. Tumour thickness was determined according to the criteria of Breslow and tumour stage according to the TNM classification. Clasification of the MM stages was based on UICC (according to Hermanek et al., 1987): T, N, M system: Stage I: T1-2, N0, M0; Stage II: T3-4, N0, M0; Stage III: T1-4, N1-2, M0; Stage IV: T1-4, N1-2, M1 5. The following classification of the stages was used: I: (a) 0 0.75, (b) 0.76 1.5 mm; II: (a) 1.51 4.00 mm, (b) >4.00 mm; III: T1-4, N1, N2 (regional lymph nodes), M0; IV: T1-4, N1-2, M1 (distant metastases). In our study 50 patients were included; 26 females and 24 males, aged from 22 to 83 (Figure 1). There were 15 patients in stage I; 23 in stage II; 8 in stage III, and 4 in stage IV of the disease. Serum concentrations of MIA were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), Photometric Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (Dia Sarin), (n.v.<10 ng/ml). Serum concentrations of S-100 were determined by Sangtec 100 ELISA (n.v.<0.150 g/l). Serum concentrations of LDH were measured by UV assay (n.v.<241 U/L). Serum concentrations of tyrosinase were measured by RT PCR (n.v.= negative). Results TABLE 1 PATIENTS WITH MM: CHARACTERISTICS STAGEIn=15(6m:9f) /age 17 71/ L: trunk 10, legs 3, arms 2 STAGE II n=23 (10 m : 13 f) /age 22 71/ L: trunk 11, arms 6, legs 6 STAGEIIIn=8(8m:3f) /age 45 74/ L: trunk 4, legs 3, arms 1 STAGEIVn=4(3m:1f) /age 42 66/ L: trunk 4 L localization, m male, f female The results of the serum markers analysis are presented in the figures 1 5. The increased values of MIA were noticed in 26% of the patients in stage I, in 26% in stage II, in in stage III and, in 5 in stage IV (Figure 2). The increased values of S-100 protein were found in 13% of the patients in stage I, in 9% in stage II, in in stage III and, in 5 in stage IV (Figure 3). The increased vaules of LDH were noticed in 26% of the patients in stage I, in 4% stage II, 13% in stage III and, in 25% in stage IV (Figure 4). The positive serum tyrosinase was found in of the patients in stage I, in 17.3% in stage II, in 12.5% in stage III and, in 25% in stage IV 26 24 MALE FEMALE N = 50 Fig. 1. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to the gender. 6 5 4 2 1 52% 16% Fig. 2. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to MIA values and stages (I-IV). 8% 8

S-100 protein mg/l (60.0) (4.4) 0.22 0.20 0.18 0.16 0.14 0.12 N.V. 0.10 0.08 0.06 0.04 0.02 Fig. 3. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to MIA and stages. 2/15 2/23 0/8 2/4 13% 9% 5 Fig. 4. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to S-100 protein and stages. 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 2 1 Tyrosinase NEGATIVE POSITIVE 0/15 4/23 17.3% 1/8 12.5% 1/4 25% Fig. 6. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to tyrosinase and stages. Fig. 5. The groups of patients with malignant melanoma according to LDH and stages. (Figure 5). The majority of MM patients had values of serum markers within the normal range.there was no significant difference in the number of elevated serum markers between the patients in the stage I, II, III or IV. 9

Discussion Although there is no routine procedure for determination of serum tumour markers for the patients with MM, some markers may have a significant role in the follow-up, as possible prognostic factors in the early detection of disease progression or in the prediction of the therapy outcome 4. Serum protein S-100 and MIA have been described as possible useful tumour markers for MM. For most of these markers, serum levels are more pronounced in more advanced stages of the disease. Therefore, these markers seem to have no place in the early detection of melanoma. On the other hand, sensitivity in the advanced stages of disease seems to be <10, compromising their use as a new staging procedure. MIA was found to be more sensitive as a potential prognostic marker for patients with metastatic MM in comparison with S-100 5. Regular determination of S-100 and MIA levels during follow-up can be used for early detection of the tumour relapse in melanoma patients, increased serum concentrations of these marker proteins being indicative of tumour growth 9. In our study, increased MIA level was found in 26% of the patients in stage I (localized disease), in none of the patients in stage III and, in only 5 of the patients with visceral metastases. Furthermore, increased S-100 level was found in only 5 of the patients with metastatic disease. These findings indicate that increased levels of both MIA and S-100 protein should not be considered confident markers of the tumour dissemination. It has been observed that patients with distant melanoma metastases with elevated serum S-100, MIA, or LDH had poorer overall survival than patients with normal serum concentrations 3,8. These three markers can also be used to monitor the course of the disease and therapy outcome in patients with distant metastases. Regular determination of S-100 and MIA levels during follow-up may be used for early detection of a tumour relapse in melanoma patients 10,11. Thus increased serum concentrations of these marker proteins may be indicative of tumour growth. Auge et al. found the relation between S-100 and metastases site with higher sensitivity and mean concentrations in patients with brain metastases with the lowest in those with lung metastases 1. They found the correlation between MIA and the same metastases locations and considered that S100 and MIA are useful markers related to prognostic factors, being more effective when used in combination. Krahn et al. suggested that S-100 is a more reliable tumour marker in peripheral blood for patients with newly occurred melanoma metastases compared with MIA, albumin and LDH 7. However, we found increased level of LDH similar in patients with both localized (26%) and disseminated disease (25%). Regarding to the given results, serum LDH in patients with MM should not be considered a strongly reliable indicator of the metastases occurrence. Since there are no marker proteins for melanoma that are not dependent on the tumour load, it is not currently possible to forecast the survival of patients who are tumour free after surgery 12. However, the serum markers currently available for melanoma have only limited clinical use. Conclusion Serum markers are not suitable for screening or the diagnostics of primary melanomas, but may be useful in detection of metastatic spread at an early stage of MM progression. The serum S-100 and MIA represent markers that may be valuable in metastases detection, tumour progression monitoring, or in the prediction of the therapy outcome. Thus, determination of serum markers in MM patients may be used in practice and indicate a widely disseminated incurable disease, but their use as tumour markers for melanoma is limited. REFERENCES 1. AUGE JM, MOLINA R, FILELLA X, BOSCH E, CAO M, GONZA- LEZ S, PUIG S, MALVEHY J, CASTEL T, BALLESTA AM, Anticancer Res 25 (2005) 1779. 2. TAS F, YASASEVER V, DURANYILDIZ D, CAMLICA H, UATUNER Z, AYDINER A, TOPAZ E, Am J Clin Oncol, 27 (2004) 225. 3. BROCHEZ L, NAEYAERT JM, Br J Dermatol, 143 (2000) 256. 4. UGURAL S, Hautarzt, 56 (2005) 173. 5. BRAUN- FALCO O, PLEWIG G, WOLFF HH, BURGDORF WHC: Dermatology (2nd Edition, Completely Revised Edition Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer, 1995). 6. JURGENSEN A, HOLZAPFEL U, HEIN R, STOLZ W, BUETTNER R, BOSSERHOFF A, Tumour Biol, 22 (2001) 54. 7. KRAHN G, KASKEL P, SANDER S, WAIZENHOFER PJ, WORTMANN S, LEITER U, PETER RU, Anticancer Res, 21 (2001) 1311. 8. SCHM- ITZ C, BRENNER W, HENZE E, CHRISTOPHERS E, HAUSCHILD A, Anticancer Res, 20 (2000) 5059. 9. DJUKANOVIC D, HOFMANN U, SUCKER A, RITTGEN W, SCHADENDORF D, Anticancer Res, 20 (2000) 2203. 10. MARTENSON ED, HANSSON LO, NILSSON B, VON SCHOULTZ E, MANSSON BRAHME E, RINGBORG U, HANS- SON J, J Clin Oncol, 19 (2001) 824. 11. WOLLINA U, KARTE K, HIP- LER UC, KNOLL B, KIRSCH K, HEROLDC C, J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 126 (2000) 107. 12. LUGOVI] L, [ITUM M, KOS L, Acta Dermatovenerol Croat, 13 (2005) 36. L. Lugovi} Clinical Department of Dermatovenerology, University Hospital»Sestre milosrdnice«, Vinogradska cesta 29, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia e-mail: liborija@yahoo.com 10

REZULTATI MJERENJA SERUMSKIH MARKERA U BOLESNIKA S MALIGNIM MELANOMOM SA@ETAK Unato~ ~injenici da danas jo{ ne postoje to~ne smjernice za odabir serumskih markera u bolesnika s malignim melanomom (MM), odre eni markeri mogli bi imati zna~ajnu ulogu. Pokazalo se da razine laktat-dehidrogenaze (LDH), proteina S-100B, MIA (melanoma-inchibiting activity), kao i tirozinaze mogu korelirati s progresijom melanoma. U ovoj studiji navedeni pokazatelji mjereni su u 50 bolesnika s MM (stadij I-IV). Povi{ena razina MIA zabilje`ena je u 26% bolesnika sa stadijem I, te u 5 bolesnika sa stadijem IV. Povi{ena razina S-100 proteina zabilje`ena je u 13% bolesnika sa stadijem I, te u 25% bolesnika sa stadijem IV. Povi{ena razina LDH na ena je u 26% bolesnika sa stadijem I, te u 25% bolesnika sa stadijem IV. Pozitivna tirozinaza detektirana je u 17,3% bolesnika sa stadijem II, te u 25% bolesnika sa stadijem IV. Zabilje`eni rezultati nisu otkrili statisti~ki zna~ajnu razliku izme u skupina bolesnika sa ni`im, odnosno vi{im stadijem bolesti, ukazuju}i na to da serumski markeri nisu pouzdani pokazatelji progresije MM. 11