Audibility, discrimination and hearing comfort at a new level: SoundRecover2

Similar documents
SoundRecover2 the first adaptive frequency compression algorithm More audibility of high frequency sounds

Best practice protocol

SoundRecover2: Description and Verification Protocols

Best Practice Protocols

SoundRecover2 More audibility of high-frequency sounds for adults with severe to profound hearing loss

Candidacy and Verification of Oticon Speech Rescue TM technology

Phonak Target. SoundRecover2 adult fitting guide. Content. The Connecting the hearing instruments. February 2018

Fitting Frequency Compression Hearing Aids to Kids: The Basics

Baker, A., M.Cl.Sc (AUD) Candidate University of Western Ontario: School of Communication Sciences and Disorders

Phoneme Perception Test 3.0

Issues faced by people with a Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Clinical fitting guide

Best practices in A few favorite resources: Clear areas of agreement: How about these features? The bottom line:

Audiogram+: GN Resound proprietary fitting rule

FREQUENCY COMPOSITION : A NEW APPROACH TO FREQUENCY- LOWERING

Acoustics, signals & systems for audiology. Psychoacoustics of hearing impairment

Frequency refers to how often something happens. Period refers to the time it takes something to happen.

Paediatric Amplification

Critical Review: Based on its effect on speech and phoneme recognition in children, should frequency lowering be used in pediatric amplification?

Interpreting Speech Results to Optimise Hearing aid Fittings

FREQUENCY COMPRESSION AND FREQUENCY SHIFTING FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED

Support. Studies of bandwidth: Some Types of evidence to consider: Studies of bandwidth: Stelmachowicz et al 2004

Chapter 3 NON-LINEAR FREQUENCY COMPRESSION IN HEARING AIDS

EEL 6586, Project - Hearing Aids algorithms

Phonak Target 4.3. Desktop Fitting Guide. Content. March 2016

The Devil is in the Fitting Details. What they share in common 8/23/2012 NAL NL2

FREQUENCY LOWERING IN THE PEDIATRIC POPULATION: OUTCOMES AND CONSIDERATIONS FOR FITTING. Capstone. Lauren Virginia Ross, B.A.

Validation Studies. How well does this work??? Speech perception (e.g., Erber & Witt 1977) Early Development... History of the DSL Method

ASR. ISSN / Audiol Speech Res 2017;13(3): / RESEARCH PAPER

2/16/2012. Fitting Current Amplification Technology on Infants and Children. Preselection Issues & Procedures

Sonic Spotlight. SmartCompress. Advancing compression technology into the future

Optimising Outcomes for Speech Mapping

Building Practice Success Through Speechmap Real Ear Measurements. Chris Stokes-Rees

AccuQuest Spotlight: Successful Fittings with Oasis. Fitting Range

Phonak Target 5.4. Phonak Target Fitting Guide. Content. August 2018

Audiogram+: The ReSound Proprietary Fitting Algorithm

Phonak Target 6.0. Phonak Target Fitting Guide. Content. November 2018

Desktop Fitting Guide for Phonak Brio 3

Evidence base for hearing aid features:

HCS 7367 Speech Perception

A comparison of manufacturer-specific prescriptive procedures for infants

Pho. nak. Desktop. August with Phonak. Target. Fitting

The University of Western Ontario Plurals Test v1.4

WIDEXPRESS. no.30. Background

Comparing Speech Perception Abilities of Children with Cochlear Implants and Digital Hearing Aids

Research Design: This study consisted of a within-participant design with repeated measures across test conditions.

Hello Old Friend the use of frequency specific speech phonemes in cortical and behavioural testing of infants

Verifying the Lyric Audibility Advantage

Can you hear me now? Amanda Wolfe, Au.D. Examining speech intelligibility differences between bilateral and unilateral telephone listening conditions

Potential Mechanisms for Perception of Frequency-Lowered Speech

2.0. Desktop Fitting Guide getting started. Preparation of the hearing instruments

The Situational Hearing Aid Response Profile (SHARP), version 7 BOYS TOWN NATIONAL RESEARCH HOSPITAL. 555 N. 30th St. Omaha, Nebraska 68131

Beltone Electronics 2601 Patriot Boulevard Glenview, IL U.S.A. (800)

Lyric3 Programming Features

DSL v5 in Connexx 7 Mikael Menard, Ph.D., Philippe Lantin Sivantos, 2015.

Sonic Spotlight. Frequency Transfer Providing Audibility For High-Frequency Losses

Audiology Today MarApr2011

Hearing Solutions Catalog Winter Supplement January 2009

Juan Carlos Tejero-Calado 1, Janet C. Rutledge 2, and Peggy B. Nelson 3

An assessment of the validity of a subjective hearing aid verification procedure

What Is the Difference between db HL and db SPL?

Evaluation of a digital power hearing aid: SENSO P38 1

The Use of a High Frequency Emphasis Microphone for Musicians Published on Monday, 09 February :50

Using digital hearing aids to visualize real-life effects of signal processing

Prescribe hearing aids to:

Hearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants

Power Instruments, Power sources: Trends and Drivers. Steve Armstrong September 2015

Elements of Effective Hearing Aid Performance (2004) Edgar Villchur Feb 2004 HearingOnline

Verification of soft speech amplification in hearing aid fitting: A comparison of methods

Although considerable work has been conducted on the speech

Turn up the volume on life. The powerful choice for your super power users

Re/Habilitation of the Hearing Impaired. Better Hearing Philippines Inc.

Hearing Lectures. Acoustics of Speech and Hearing. Auditory Lighthouse. Facts about Timbre. Analysis of Complex Sounds

C HAPTER FOUR. Audiometric Configurations in Children. Andrea L. Pittman. Introduction. Methods

Quick Guide Binaural REM

Testing Digital Hearing Aids

AURICAL Plus with DSL v. 5.0b Quick Guide. Doc no /04

Slow compression for people with severe to profound hearing loss

ClaroTM Digital Perception ProcessingTM

The Compression Handbook Fourth Edition. An overview of the characteristics and applications of compression amplification

A Phoneme Perception Test Method for High-Frequency Hearing Aid Fitting DOI: /jaaa.15037

FREQUENCY. Prof Dr. Mona Mourad Dr.Manal Elbanna Doaa Elmoazen ALEXANDRIA UNIVERSITY. Background

Psychoacoustical Models WS 2016/17

Effect of Adaptive Frequency Lowering on Phoneme Identification and Sound Quality of Music in Hearing-impaired Listeners

Insio: A new standard in custom instruments

The effect of nonlinear frequency compression and linear frequency transposition on speech perception in school-aged children

EVALUATION OF SPEECH PERCEPTION IN PATIENTS WITH SKI SLOPE HEARING LOSS USING ARABIC CONSTANT SPEECH DISCRIMINATION LISTS

AJA. Research Article

Beyond the Audiogram:

AJA. Research Article. Effects of Low-Pass Filtering on the Perception of Word-Final Plurality Markers in Children and Adults With Normal Hearing

USE OF CORTICAL AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIALS IN ASSESSMENT OF HEARING AND EVALUATION OF HEARING AIDS

Supplementary Online Content

Importance of a Good Start. Topics. Rationale. In-Situ Audiometry. In-Situ Audiometry. Enhancing the Initial

User groups Most sensorineural, conductive and mixed hearing losses in the categories of severe and profound.

Research Article The Acoustic and Peceptual Effects of Series and Parallel Processing

Editorial Hearing Aids and the Brain

The Influence of Audibility on Speech Recognition With Nonlinear Frequency Compression for Children and Adults With Hearing Loss

Frequency-Lowering Devices for Managing High-Frequency Hearing Loss: A Review

Speech Cue Weighting in Fricative Consonant Perception in Hearing Impaired Children

Transcription:

Audibility, discrimination and hearing comfort at a new level: SoundRecover2 Julia Rehmann, Michael Boretzki, Sonova AG 5th European Pediatric Conference Current Developments and New Directions in Pediatric Audiology Berlin, June 2016

Content SoundRecover SoundRecover2 Adaptive function Perceptual effects and benefits Fitting Verification 2

Thanks a lot to Siddhartha Jha, Silvia Allegro to Susan Scollie, Danielle Glista, Marianne Hawkins, Jace Wolfe, Andrea Bohnert, Simone Ebbing 3

SoundRecover

Hearing Loss db HL Level db HL Audibility Restoration 1 0 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 0 0 00 000 Frequency Hz s 95% 85% 75% 65% 55% 45% 35% 25% 15% 5% Hearing threshold percentiles of 8249 audiograms Amplification Frequency compression 5

Output level Output level Two strategies for audibility restoration Less gain required Larger residual dynamics Less prone to output distortion More acoustic stability (less feedback) High frequency sounds less sharp Ear s processing quality higher /s/ Amplification /s/ Amplification + Frequency Lowering Frequency Frequency 6

SoundRecover: Non-Linear Frequency Compression Output frequency khz Foutmax CF 1 CR=Δx/Δy 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 7

SoundRecover: Non-Linear Frequency Compression Output frequency khz 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 8

SoundRecover: Non-Linear Frequency Compression SoundRecover is static. Within a hearing program one and the same compression scheme is applied to all sounds. 9

Phoneme Perception Test: Tests and Stimuli Audibility test Above which level are the test sounds audible? Distinction test How discriminable are audible test sounds? Recognition test Above which level are audible test sounds intelligible? s s sh sh asa asa asha asha 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Frequency khz

Threshold db SPL Haubold, Schmitt (2012): Effects of frequency compression Whiskers: Recognition Bars: Detection Aided versus unaided: Significant increase of audibility sh 3 khz sh 5 khz s 6 khz s 9 khz Frequency compression none off on Amplification none Ambra

Threshold db SPL Haubold, Schmitt (2012): Effects of frequency compression Whiskers: Recognition Bars: Detection Frequency compression: Significant improvement of /s/ audibility sh 3 khz sh 5 khz s 6 khz s 9 khz Frequency compression none off on Amplification none Ambra

Threshold db SPL Haubold, Schmitt (2012): Effects of frequency compression Whiskers: Recognition Bars: Detection Frequency compression: Significant improvement of /s/ recognition sh 3 khz sh 5 khz s 6 khz s 9 khz Frequency compression none off on Amplification none Ambra

Frequency compression: Perceptual trade-offs Audibility of high frequency sounds Distinction of audible high frequency sounds Clarity: Audibility and distinction of high frequency sounds Comfort: Familiarity of low and mid frequency sounds 14

Limitations of SoundRecover Severe to profound hearing loss with no responses beyond 2 khz No lowering to audible frequency range 15

Limitations of SoundRecover Cut-off frequencies below 1.5 khz: Considerably unfamiliar sound quality Considerable portion of harmonics (overtones) lose harmonic relationship Formant structure of vowels is affected considerably. Vowels sound unfamiliar, can be misunderstood. Therefore minimum cut-off frequency of original SoundRecover has been set to 1.5 khz. Individuals with profound hearing loss need lower cut-off frequencies. Reason to develop SoundRecover2!

SoundRecover2 1 Adaptive Function

SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz Compressive only if energy in upper frequency band is higher than in lower frequency band 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 18

SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz /u/ 1 linear 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 19

SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz /a/ linear 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 20

SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz /s/ at 5 khz compressed 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 21

SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz /s/ at 8 khz compressed 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 22

Both frequency compressors compared Output frequency khz SoundRecover SoundRecover2 1 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 23

Advantage of less compression with SoundRecover2 Output frequency khz SoundRecover SoundRecover2 1 1 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 24

SoundRecover2 2 Perceptual Effects and Benefits

Perceptual Effects of SoundRecover2 SoundRecover2 increases audibility of soft high frequency sounds and components of sound by that increases distinction of said sounds, by that supports recognition of said sounds, affects familiarity of compressed high frequency sounds affects familiarity of mid frequency sounds less than original SoundRecover 26

SoundRecover: Perceptual trade-offs Audibility of high frequency sounds Distinction of audible high frequency sounds Clarity: Audibility and distinction of high frequency sounds Comfort: Familiarity of low and mid frequency sounds 27

SoundRecover2: Perceptual trade-offs mitigated considerably Audibility of high frequency sounds Distinction of audible high frequency sounds Clarity: Audibility and distinction of high frequency sounds Comfort: Familiarity of low and mid frequency sounds 28

Study of Jace Wolfe et al. (2016) 14 subjects Children - teenagers Severe to profound high frequency sensorineural hearing loss Experimental conditions SoundRecover Mature prototype of SoundRecover2 Metrics Word recognition in quiet Recognition of plural /s/ Results Improved word recognition in quiet with SoundRecover2 Improved recognition of plurals with SoundRecover2 Wolfe, J., Duke, M., Schafer, E., Rehmann, J., Jha, S., John, A., Jones, C. (2016). Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children. Submitted to International Journal of Audiology. 29

Study at headquarters Stäfa 8 subjects Average age 56.8 years Symmetrical sensorineural or mixed hearing loss Average hearing loss in frequency range 0.25 to 8 khz higher than 90 db Experimental conditions SoundRecover SoundRecover2 Metrics Phoneme Perception Test Detection of /sh/ and /s/ stimuli Recognition of /sh/ and /s/ stimuli Results Improved detection of fricative stimuli with SoundRecover2 Improved recognition of fricative stimuli with SoundRecover2 Ebbing, S. et al. (2016). Internal research report. Stäfa 30

Threshold level db SPL Study at headquarters Stäfa 80 SoundRecover SoundRecover2 Significant improvement of fricative audibilities 70 60 50 40 30 20 sh 3 sh 5 s 6 s 9 sh 3 sh 5 s 6 s 9 Phoneme Mid frequency khz 31

Benefits of SoundRecover2 SoundRecover2 serves patients with profound hearing loss considerably better than original SoundRecover by better audibility of high frequency sounds due to lower cut-off frequencies better discrimination of high frequency sounds due to smaller compression ratios more familiarity of mid frequency sounds due to adaptive linear or compressive processing of sound frequencies offers an extended fitting range better addresses needs of individuals with ski-slope losses and left corner audiograms 32

SoundRecover2 3 Fitting

SoundRecover2: Pre-calculation TARGET fitting software proposes SoundRecover2 settings based on studies on hearing performance with and preference of varied and tuned SoundRecover2 settings. Pre-calculated SoundRecover2 settings make conservative use of remaining hearing sensitivity, keep mid frequency components of harmonic sounds like vowels or tones natural, substantially increase audiblity of high frequency sounds, especially to users with severe to profound hearing loss. 34

SoundRecover2: Technical parameters Output frequency khz Foutmax CF2 CF1 CR=Δx/ Δy 0.1 0.1 1 Input frequency khz 35

SoundRecover2: Display in TARGET fitting software Frequency compression None Adaptive Static CF1 CF2 Foutmax 36

SoundRecover2: Tuning Audibility of high frequency sounds Distinction of audible high frequency sounds 37

SoundRecover2: Fine Tuning Clarity: Audibility and distinction of high frequency sounds Comfort: Familiarity of low and mid frequency sounds 38

SoundRecover2 4 Verification

Verification of SoundRecover2 with adults: Phoneme Perception Test Audibility test Above which level are the test sounds audible? Distinction test How discriminable are audible test sounds? Recognition test Above which level are audible test sounds intelligible? s s sh sh asa asa asha asha 1 2 3 4 5 6 8 Frequency khz

Verification of SoundRecover2 in pediatric fittings Glista, Hawkins, Scollie, Wolfe, Bohnert, Rehmann (2016) 41

Verification of SoundRecover2 in pediatric fittings Step 1: Fit-to-targets and verify with SoundRecover2 turned off Verify the shape and gain of the hearing aid with SoundRecover2 turned OFF, and fine-tune to targets. 42

Verification of SoundRecover2 in pediatric fittings Step 2: Determine Candidacy Measure the spectrum of the /s/ stimulus with SoundRecover2 OFF to determine if the /s/, including the upper shoulder, falls within the MAOF range using a standard speech passage at 65 db SPL. If /s/ is outside of this range, proceed to step 3. MAOF Range Peak of /s/ stimulus Lower shoulder of the /s/ Upper shoulder of the /s/ 43

Verification of SoundRecover2 in pediatric fittings Step 3: Fine-tuning SoundRecover2 With SoundRecover2 turned on, measure the spectrum of the /s/ at the default setting. If the /s/ does not fall within the MAOF range, adjust the Audibility-Distinction slider to use the weakest possible setting for achieving the desired audibility. Re-measure the /s/ to ensure MAOF Range that the chosen setting produces audibility of /s/ within the MAOF range. It is recommended that the fitter choose a setting where the upper shoulder of /s/ is closest to the upper limit of the MAOF range. 44

Summary

Summary SoundRecover is non-linear frequency compression. Its effect is static. SoundRecover substantially increases audibility and recognition of high frequency sounds. Familiarity of the heard decreases as the strength of SoundRecover is increased. SoundRecover does not serve individuals with profound hearing loss sufficiently. SoundRecover2 is adaptive and offers lower cut-off frequencies than SoundRecover. SoundRecover2 fitting parameters offer to balance two fundamental trade-offs of frequency compression: Audibility versus distinction of high frequency sounds Audibility and distinction versus familiarity of low and mid frequency sounds. SoundRecover2 outperforms SoundRecover when hearing loss is profound. In adults you can use the Phoneme Perception Test for verification of SoundRecover2. In pediatric fittings verification should follow the white paper of Glista et al. 46

Thanks a lot for your attention!