Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria; 5 Queen Mary Hospital, University of London, Barts Health, London, UK; 6

Similar documents
Comparison of two HCV-RNA assays assessing early response to simeprevir+pegifn/rbv to select patients suitable to shorten therapy to 12 weeks

Treatement Experienced patients without cirrhosis. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona

Simeprevir + PEG + RBV in Treatment-Naïve Genotype 1 QUEST-1 Trial

Latest Treatment Updates for GT 2 and GT 3 Patients

HCV Case Study. Treat Now or Wait for New Therapies

Hepatitis C: Management of Treatment Naïve Patients with First Line Protease Inhibitors

Program Disclosure. Provider is approved by the California Board of Registered Nursing, Provider #13664, for 1.5 contact hours.

Clinical Management: Treatment of HCV Mono-infection

Interferon free therapy Are we getting there? Graham R Foster Queen Marys University of London

HCV therapy : Clinical case

New developments in HCV research and their implications for front-line practice

Gane et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2017) 17:389 DOI /s

EASL 2013 Interferon Free, All Oral Regimens for Hepatitis C. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

TREATMENT OF GENOTYPE 2

New Therapeutic Strategies: Polymerase Inhibitors

How to optimize current therapy for GT1 patients Shortened therapy with IFNa-based therapy

Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

INTERFERON-FREE COMBINATION TREATMENT WITH THE HCV NS3/4A PROTEASE INHIBITOR FALDAPREVIR AND THE NON-NUCLEOSIDE NS5B INHIBITOR BI

Tratamiento de la Hepatitis C Rafael Esteban Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebrón Barcelona

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Future strategies with new DAAs

Genotype 4, finally cured? Imam Waked Professor of Medicine National Liver Institute

IFN-free therapy in naïve HCV GT1 patients

Introduction. The ELECTRON Trial

47 th Annual Meeting AISF

Clinical Cases Hepatitis C Naïve Patients. Rafael Esteban Liver Unit. Hospital General Universitari Vall Hebron. Barcelona.

Antiviral treatment in HCV cirrhotic patients on waiting list

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

ICVH 2016 Oral Presentation: 28

Optimal Treatment with Boceprevir. Michael Manns

Highlights of AASLD 2012 CCO Official Conference Coverage of the 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

Protease inhibitor based triple therapy in treatment experienced patients

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in HCV GT 1 or 4 & Prior DAA Treatment MAGELLAN-1 (Part 2)

Emerging Therapies for HCV: Highlights from AASLD 2012 (Part 2)

Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

November 2013 AASLD Investor Event 4 November

Phase 3. Treatment Experienced. Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir +/- Ribavirin in HCV Genotype 1 ION-2. Afdhal N, et al. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:

Why make this statement?

Virological Tools and Monitoring in the DAA Era

Hepatitis C: Management of Previous Non-responders with First Line Protease Inhibitors

HCV In 2015: Maximizing SVR

How do you optimize HCV Treatment for Cirrhotic Patients APASL STC Cebu

How to optimize treatment for HCV Genotype 4

PIB. Next Generation Direct-Acting Antivirals. Collectively: G/P. Pibrentasvir (formerly ABT-530) pangenotypic NS5A inhibitor

Update on chronic hepatitis C treatment: current trends, new challenges, what next?

Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir (Harvoni)

SYNOPSIS Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI444031

Treatment of HCV in 2016

Personalised Treatment with Telaprevir in Graham R Foster Professor of Hepatology Queen Marys University of London

Treatment of genotype 4 patient. with cirrhosis. Vincent LEROY Clinique Universitaire d Hépato-Gastroentérologie INSERM U823 CHU de Grenoble

Current trends in CHC 1st genotype treatment

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Cirrhotic Genotype 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 EXPEDITION-1

Hepatitis C Treatment 2014

SAVINO BRUNO, MD Director Internal Medicine and Hepatology Unit AO Fatebenefratelli e Oftalmico, Milano

A novel microdose approach to assess bioavailability, intestinal absorption, gut metabolism, and hepatic clearance of simeprevir in healthy volunteers

Efficacy of Re-treatment With TMC435 as Combination Therapy in Hepatitis C Virus Infected Patients Following TMC435 Monotherapy

HCV Treatment Failure: What Next? Dr Ashley Brown, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in drug-naïve patients

29th Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board Meeting

Strategies towards cure of HCV infection: a personalized approach. Heiner Wedemeyer Hannover Medical School Hannover, Germany

Don t interfere My first choice is always nucs!

Rome, February nd Riunione Annuale AISF th AISF ANNUAL MEETING

Abstract LB-12. POLARIS-2: Pangenotypic Single Tablet Regimen with Inhibitors of HCV NS5B (Nucleotide) + NS5A + NS3

HIV Infection with HCV Future Directions

Treatment of Hepatitis C in HIV-Coinfected Patients. Vincent Soriano Department of Infectious Diseases Hospital Carlos III Madrid, Spain

TRATTARE IL PAZIENTE CON FIBROSI LIEVE: RISCHI E OPPORTUNITA. Prof. Gloria Taliani Dott. Elisa Biliotti Sapienza Università di Roma

Clinical Сase A previously relapse to PEG IFN + RBV in HCV G3a patient. Konstantin Zhdanov

Optimal ltherapy in non 1 genotypes:

The Changing World of Hepatitis C

Hepatitis C Emerging Treatment Paradigms

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2

Case 4: A 61-year-old man with HCV genotype 3 with cirrhosis. Ira M. Jacobson, M.D. Weill Cornell Medical College New York, New York USA

Interferon-based and interferon-free new treatment options

How to optimize treatment in G3 patients? Jérôme GOURNAY, MD Hépatologie Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes France

Hepatitis C: Difficult-to-treat Patients 11th Paris Hepatology Conference 16th January 2018 Stefan Zeuzem, MD University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany

Treatment of a patient with genotype 7 HCV infection with sofosbuvir and velpatasvir. Moreno 1

Evolution of Therapy in HCV

Hepatitis C Highlights from ILC / EASL 2016

Follow-up of patients with SVR Lawrence Serfaty Service d Hépatologie, UMR_S 938 Hôpital Saint-Antoine Université Pierre&Marie Curie Paris, France

Treatment of Hepatitis C GT 3

What is the Optimized Treatment Duration? To Overtreat versus Undertreat. Nancy Reau, MD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

New Therapies on the Horizon in Hepatitis C Patients Paul Y. Kwo, MD

CURRENT TREATMENTS. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia. Richmond and Newport News, VA, USA

HCV Treatment in 2016: is there still a role for IFNa and ribavirin?

Experience with pre-transplant antiviral treatment: PEG/RBV and DAA. Xavier Forns, MD Liver Unit Hospital Clínic IDIBAPS and CIBREHD Barcelona

Preliminary Results of an Evaluation of Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir in Patients with Chronic HCV or HCV/HIV Co-Infection

Predictors of Response to Hepatitis C Therapy in the DAA Era. Pablo Barreiro Servicio de Enfermedades Infecciosas Hospital Carlos III, Madrid

5/12/2016. Learning Objectives. Management of Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 2 or 3 Infected Treatment-Naive or Experienced Patients

TECHNICAL SUMMARY OF RESULTS

Michael Fried, MD University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, NC. Ira Jacobson, MD Weill Cornell Medical College New York, NY

Current Treatments for HCV

HCV Update from AASLD 2016

Express Scripts, Inc. monograph dated 5/25/2011; selected revision 6/1/2011

Dr Janice Main Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London

DAA-based treatment in cirrhotic and post-transplanted patients. Audrey Coilly, MD Hôpital Paul Brousse, Villejuif, France

VII CURSO AVANCES EN INFECCIÓN VIH Y HEPATITIS VIRALES

ASSAYS UTILZIED TO MONITOR HCV AND ITS TREATMENT

HCV-G3: Sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir?

Study Design - GT 1 Retreatment

Associate Professor of Medicine University of Chicago

Transcription:

Shortening overall treatment to 12 weeks of simeprevir plus PR in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 patients: assessment of baseline and Week 2 on-treatment predictors of SVR T Asselah, 1 C Moreno, 2 C Sarrazin, 3 M Gschwantler, 4 GR Foster, 5 A Craxi, 6 P Buggisch, 7 R Ryan, 8 O Lenz, 9 G Van Dooren, 9 I Lonjon-Domanec, 1 M Schlag, 11 M Buti 12 1 Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France; 2 CUB Hôpital Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium; 3 Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital, Frankfurt-am-Main, Germany; 4 Wilhelminenspital, Vienna, Austria; 5 Queen Mary Hospital, University of London, Barts Health, London, UK; 6 University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy; 7 Institute for Interdisciplinary Medicine, Hamburg, Germany; 8 Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, NJ, USA; 9 Janssen Infectious Diseases BVBA, Beerse, Belgium; 1 Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Paris, France; 11 Janssen-Cilag, Vienna, Austria; 12 Hospital Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Institut Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain

Disclosures Tarik Asselah is a speaker and investigator for AbbVie, BMS, Janssen, Gilead, Roche and MSD

Simeprevir (SMV) NS3 protease SMV Truncated peptide form of the NS4A co-factor Once-daily capsule, HCV NS3/4A protease with pan-genotypic activity with the exception of genotype 3 1,2 Approved in the EU, Japan, Canada, Russia, USA and in other regions Approved in the EU and USA in combination with PegIFN or SOF for HCV genotype 1 and genotype 4 3 Ongoing clinical development in IFN-free combinations in genotypes 1 and 4 4 Good safety and tolerability profile in clinical trials 5 8 and in real-world evidence studies 9 1 1. Reesink et al. Gastroenterology 21;138:913 21; 2. Moreno et al. J Hepatol 212;56:1247 53 3. Simeprevir SmPCs; 4. clinicaltrials.gov; 5. Jacobson I. Lancet 214;384:43 13 6. Manns et al, Lancet 214;384:414 26; 7. Forns et al. Gastroenterology 214;146:1669 79 8. Moreno et al. EASL 214. Poster 1319; 9. Jensen et al. AASLD 214. Oral 45 1. Dieterich et al. AASLD 214. Oral 46

RGT* (%) Background: treatment duration for SMV + PR in HCV genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients RGT assessment SMV 1 8 6 88 PR PR 4 12 24 36 48 Time (weeks) 2 459/519 Genotype 1 45/459 *Determined by RGT: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at Week 4 and undetectable at Week 12; RGT: response-guided therapy RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at Week 4) 1. Jacobson I et al. AASLD 213. Abstract 1122

RGT* (%) SVR12 (%) Background: treatment duration for SMV + PR in HCV genotype 1 treatment-naïve patients RGT assessment 1 Eligible for 24 weeks 88 1 Subsequent SVR12 88 SMV 8 6 8 6 PR PR 4 4 12 24 36 48 Time (weeks) 2 459/519 Genotype 1 2 45/459 Genotype 1 *Determined by RGT: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at Week 4 and undetectable at Week 12; RGT: response-guided therapy RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at Week 4) 1. Jacobson I et al. AASLD 213. Abstract 1122

Background: 12 weeks triple therapy with protease inhibitor in HCV genotype 1 patients CONCISE study (TVR + PR) 1 : Treatment-naïve and prior relapsers with HCV genotype 1 and IL28B CC 12 weeks of therapy, if RVR (week 4) achieved SVR rate of 87% *Determined by RGT: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at Week 4 and undetectable at Week 12; RGT: response-guided therapy RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at Week 4) 1. Nelson et al. EASL 213. Poster presentation

Background: 12 weeks triple therapy with protease inhibitor in HCV genotype 1 patients CONCISE study (TVR + PR) 1 : Treatment-naïve and prior relapsers with HCV genotype 1 and IL28B CC 12 weeks of therapy, if RVR (week 4) achieved SVR rate of 87% In the current study, we investigated the possibility of shortening SMV + PR treatment to 12 weeks using an algorithm based on on-treatment response at Week 2, irrespective of baseline characteristics *Determined by RGT: HCV RNA <25 IU/mL detectable or undetectable at Week 4 and undetectable at Week 12; RGT: response-guided therapy RVR (HCV RNA undetectable at Week 4) 1. Nelson et al. EASL 213. Poster presentation

Study design (HPC314; NCT 1846832) Week 2 SVR4 SVR12 SVR24 SMV PR Post-therapy follow up 12-week group SVR4 SVR12 SVR24 SMV PR Post-therapy follow up 24-week group* 12 24 48 36 Time (weeks) 72 Patients meeting modified RGT criteria to stop all therapy after 12 weeks Patients not meeting modified RGT criteria will continue PR until Week 24 Patients stopped all therapy if HCV RNA 25 IU/mL at Week 4 *Patients in France had the option to extend treatment to 48 weeks this option was taken by one patient Roche COBAS Taqman LLOQ:25 IU/mL, LOD: 15 IU/mL. Protocol amendment for genotype 4 patients: in those with IL28B CT or TT, HCV RNA <25 IU/mL (undetectable) at Week 2 was required to qualify for the 12-week treatment arm

Study objectives and population Primary objective Evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of 12 weeks of treatment with SMV + PR in patients meeting modified RGT criteria Population Treatment naïve adults with HCV genotype 1 or 4 monoinfection with mild to moderate fibrosis METAVIR stage F F2 (biopsy or non-invasive methods) All IL28B genotypes This presentation will show data from the GT1 cohort Shortening overall treatment to 12 weeks of SMV + PR according to early virologic response in treatment-naive patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection and mild-to-moderate fibrosis Presented 12 March: 17:48 17:55

Treatment algorithm for genotype 1 IL28B genotype All HCV RNA at Week 2 of treatment < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable Treatment duration 12 weeks* 25 IU/mL detectable 24 weeks *To qualify for 12 weeks patients must also be <25 IU/mL undetectable at Week 4 and Week 8 Patients stopped all therapy if HCV RNA 25 IU/mL at Week 4 Roche COBAS Taqman LLOQ:25 IU/mL, LOD: 15 IU/mL

Patient disposition Screened (N=182) Received study treatment, ITT (n=163) Eligible for 12 weeks 12-week group (n=123; 76%) Treatment status Not eligible for 12 weeks 24-week group (n=4) Treatment status Completed (n=123*) Ongoing (n=) D/C SMV (n=) Completed (n=26) Ongoing (n=1) D/C SMV (n=13) *One patient stopped both SMV and RBV (non-compliant) after RGT was determined (stopped at Week 11). The patient completed PegIFN; Any patient who discontinued early and where eligibility could not be determined (n=2) was automatically included in the 24-week group ITT: intent-to-treat; RGT: response-guided therapy

Patient demographics and disease characteristics 12-week group 24-week group Overall (n=123) (n=4) (N=163) Male, n (%) 65 (53) 28 (7) 93 (57) Age (years), median 47. 49.5 47. BMI (kg/m²), median 25. 25.45 25.1 Race, White, n/n (%) 98/17 (92) 32/33 (97) 13/14 (93) IL28B genotype, n (%) CC CT TT HCV RNA (log 1 IU/mL), median 32 (26) 73 (59) 18 (15) 6.26 8 (2) 2 (5) 12 (3) 6.62 4 (25) 93 (57) 3 (18) 6.35 8 IU/mL, n (%) 33 (27) 3 (8) 36 (22) HCV genotype subtype*, n (%) 1b 74 (6) 22 (55) 96 (59) METAVIR score, n (%) F F1 F2 93 (76) 29 (24) 25 (63) 15 (38) 118 (73) 44 (27) *HCV geno/subtype is based on the NS5B assay, and if not available on the LIPA HCV II or Trugene results

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 6 58 4 7 1 1 2 41 5 Week 2 Week 4 EOT 19/123 8 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 6 58 4 7 1 1 2 41 5 Week 2 Week 4 EOT 19/123 8 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 6 58 4 7 1 1 2 41 5 Week 2 Week 4 EOT 19/123 8 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 6 58 4 7 1 1 2 41 5 Week 2 Week 4 EOT 19/123 8 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 6 58 4 7 1 1 2 41 5 Week 2 Week 4 EOT 19/123 8 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 11 13/123 2 3/123 32 42/123 6 58 4 7 1 1 89 66 2 41 5 19/123 8 Week 2 Week 4 EOT SVR4 SVR12 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 11 13/123 2 3/123 32 42/123 6 58 4 7 1 1 89 66 2 41 5 19/123 8 Week 2 Week 4 EOT SVR4 SVR12 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 11 13/123 2 3/123 32 42/123 6 58 4 7 1 1 89 66 2 41 5 19/123 8 Week 2 Week 4 EOT SVR4 SVR12 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 11 13/123 2 3/123 32 42/123 6 58 4 7 1 1 89 66 2 41 5 19/123 8 Week 2 Week 4 EOT SVR4 SVR12 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Virologic response (%) On-treatment response, SVR4 and SVR12 in the 12-week group < 25 IU/mL undetectable < 25 IU/mL detectable 25 IU/mL Missing 1 8 11 13/123 2 3/123 32 42/123 6 58 4 7 1 1 89 66 2 41 5 19/123 8 Week 2 Week 4 EOT SVR4 SVR12 Timepoint (weeks) Plasma HCV RNA determined by Roche COBAS Taqman HCV Test v2. assay for use with the high pure system

Patients (%) SVR12 by subgroups in the 12-week group 1 Genotype subtype 94 IL28B genotype METAVIR score Baseline HCV RNA Week 2 virologic response 8 6 63 68 55 61 74 82 6 77 58 4 38 2 31/ 49 G1a/ other 5/ 74 G1b 3/ 32 CC 4/ 73 CT 11/ 18 TT 69/ 93 F F1 11/ 29 F2 27/ 33 8K IU/mL 54/ 9 >8K IU/mL 39/ 51 <25 IU/mL undetect. 41/ 71 <25 IU/mL detect.

Predictors of response Analysis on baseline demographic and disease parameters associated with response is ongoing Results of a multivariate analysis show IL28B CC genotype, F/F1, and low HCV RNA to be predictors of response Final analysis will be presented at an upcoming conference

Patients (%) Patients (%) Treatment failures by treatment group 1 On-treatment failure (entire treatment period) Overall 1 Post-treatment failure Overall 8 6 4 2 Viral breakthrough AE Met a stopping rule at Week 4* 12-week group 5 2/4 18 3 24-week group 1/4 8 6 4 2 Missing SVR12 Relapse 33 3 12-week group 4/123 4/4 patients have not yet reached SVR12 timepoint 7/4 4 8/4 2 24-week group Any patient who discontinued early and where eligibility could not be determined was automatically included in the 24-week group *Patients stopped all therapy if HCV RNA 25 IU/mL at Week 4 Two patients withdrew due to AEs (dyspnoea and fever)

Safety: AEs by treatment group (entire treatment phase) n (%) 12-week group (n=123) 24-week group* (n=4) Overall (N=163) Any AE 117 (95) 37 (93) 154 (95) Any SAE 4 (3) 1 (3) 5 (3) AE leading to permanent stop* - 4 (1) 4 (3) For all study drugs - 3 (8) 3 (2) For PR only - 1 (3) 1 (1) Worst grade 3 or 4 AE Worst grade 3 Worst grade 4 At least possibly related to SMV 29 (24) 23 (19) 3 (2) 6 (5) 8 (2) 3 (8) 3 (8) 2 (5) 37 (23) 26 (16) 6 (4) 8 (5) Treatment-related AE At least possibly related to SMV 11 (89) 68 (55) 36 (9) 2 (5) 146 (9) 88 (54) SAEs experienced were pericoronitis, testicular necrosis, furuncle, alcohol withdrawal syndrome and rash (rash was the only AE considered possibly related to SMV) No grade 4 AEs were considered related to SMV; no discontinuations due to grade 3 AEs possibly related to SMV *Results in the 24-week group are preliminary; AEs leading to discontinuation in the four patients were dyspnoea (n=1), pyrexia (n=1) urinary incontinence (n=1); and rash (n=1). Rash and urinary incontinence were considered possibly related to SMV

Conclusions SMV + PR for 12 weeks resulted in a SVR12 rate of 66% This was below the targeted 8% SVR rates after 12 weeks SMV + PR was not only dependent on early on-treatment response; baseline factors influenced SVR rates Factors include IL28B genotype, fibrosis stage, baseline viral load Overall relapse rate in the 12-week group was 33% This seemed to be driven by relapse rates in IL28B CT and TT patients with <25 detectable at Week 2 Therefore, the protocol was amended for ongoing genotype 4 patients 2 Ongoing analysis to predict SVR rates based on positive predictors of response identified in multivariate analysis Safety was comparable to other SMV + PR trials with a similar AE profile to PR alone 1. Asselah et al. EASL 215. Poster presentation P792 2. Asselah et al. APASL 215. Oral presentation

Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank the patients and investigators for their contributions to this study Editorial support was provided by Sally Gray on behalf of Zoetic Science, an Ashfield company, funded by Janssen The authors have the following disclosures: Christoph Moreno has been a paid speaker or adviser for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Promethera. He has received research grants from Astellas, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis and Roche. Christoph Sarrazin has been a paid speaker or adviser for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Qiagen. He has received research grants from Abbott, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Roche and Qiagen. Michael Gschwantler has been a paid speaker or adviser for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GSK, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche and Tekmira. Graham R Foster has been a paid speaker or adviser for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, GSK and Roche. He has received research grants from Gilead Sciences and Springbank. Antonio Craxì has no conflicts of interest Peter Buggisch has been a paid speaker or adviser for AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche. He has received research grants from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Roche Maria Buti has been a paid speaker or adviser for Gilead Sciences, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck Sharp & Dohme Robert Ryan, Oliver Lenz, Gino Van Dooren, Isabelle Lonjon-Domanec and Michael Schlag are employees of Janssen Pharmaceuticals and may be Johnson and Johnson stockholders

Investigator sites Austria Linz, Austria Wien, Austria Belgium Brussels, Belgium Edegem, Belgium France Clichy, France Limoges Cedex 1, France Oeleans, France St Laurent Du Var, France Germany Berlin, Germany Düsseldorf, Germany Frankfurt, Germany Hamburg, Germany Würzburg, Germany United Kingdom Glasgow, UK London, UK Spain Barcelona, Spain Madrid, Spain Valencia, Spain Valme, Spain