Drug Use and Other Risk Factors Among Juveniles Arrested in San Diego County in 2003

Similar documents
2010 Juvenile Arrestee Drug Use in the San Diego Region

elements of change Juveniles

2012 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2005 MYRBS

2007 Juvenile Arrestee Drug Use in the San Diego Region

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2016 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

2014 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

Table of Contents. Management Summary

REVISED. Humboldt County 2007

2017 Juvenile Arrestee Drug Use in the San Diego Region

University of Wisconsin-Stevens Point Alcohol and Other Drug Use Survey Data Spring 2011

Substance Use Trends in the Military, Veteran and Family Population

05/26/2011 Page 1 of 15

05/26/2011 Page 1 of 15

05/27/2011 Page 1 of 15

Center for Substance Abuse Research Drug Early Warning System

REVISED. Inyo County 2007

San Joaquin County 2010

11/04/2011 Page 1 of 16

11/03/2011 Page 1 of 16

REVISED. Tulare County 2007

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

In their Eyes: An Average Child s View of their World

REVISED. Stanislaus County 2007

Substance Abuse in Washington, D.C.

ALCOHOL USE 2011 SURVEY RESULTS REPORT AND RELATED BEHAVIORS. Figure 1 n Trends in current alcohol use, Grades 9 12, New Mexico,

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Mendocino County 2010

San Francisco County 2010

11/02/2011 Page 1 of 16

San Bernardino County 2010

Riverside County 2010

San Luis Obispo County 2010

DRUG AND ALCOHOL USE

23 Sites in Convenience Sample First use of Bioassay in CJ Survey

Contra Costa County 2010

2006 METHAMPHETAMINE ADDENDUM AGGREGATE DATA

Issaquah School District. Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2015)

L.M.A.C. Alcohol Tobacco & Other Drugs Survey

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Santa Clara County 2010

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

El Dorado County 2010

Stanislaus County 2010

Substance Prevention

Current use of an electronic vapor product (such as an e-cigarette), state and regional comparison

Dallas County County Profile Report

Adolescent Substance Use: America s #1 Public Health Problem June 29, 2011

D E W. rug arly arning ystem. Working Together to Identify Emerging Drug Trends in Maryland

2012 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Miami-Dade County

Tacoma School District. Highlights from the Healthy Youth Survey (March 1, 2017)

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Monroe County Report

Sexual Ident it y and Risk Behaviors

2014 School Trend Report Hinsdale Middle School Hinsdale

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Marion County Report

High School and Youth Trends

2014 District Trend Report Hinsdale CCSD 181

2013 New Jersey Student Health Survey DRUG USE

MENTAL HEALTH 2011 SURVEY RESULTS REPORT. and Related Behaviors. Figure 1 n Trends in mental health indicators, Grades 9 12, New Mexico,

Arizona Arrestee Reporting Information Network. Annual Juvenile Report 2007

Changes in indicators of methamphetamine use and. property crime rates in Oregon

Hendry County Florida

D E W. Working Together to Identify Emerging Drug Trends in Maryland. Juvenile Offender Population Urinalysis Screening Program (OPUS) Intake Study

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Levy County Report

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Saint Johns County Report

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Liberty County Report

Composite Prevention Profile: City of Chicago, Illinois

Arizona Arrestee Reporting Information Network. Methamphetamine Use Among Recently Booked Arrestees and Detainees in Maricopa County, Arizona

2011 Youth Risk Behavior Survey Winston-Salem/Forsyth County High School Students Survey Highlights

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. District 3 Report

TOBACCO USE 2011 SURVEY RESULTS REPORT AND RELATED BEHAVIORS. Figure 1 n Trends in current tobacco use, Grades 9 12, New Mexico,

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Broward County Report

Drug Abuse Trends Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Polk County Report

October Maricopa County Juvenile Probation Department Report: 2013 juvenile probation report

Use. New. Chris Wilkins Paul Sweetsur. Bryony Smart. Chris Warne. Zealand

Healthy Kids Survey Torrey Pines High School Selected Findings 2017 N=2192 *

Drugs. Survey Question: During your life, how many times have you ever used marijuana?

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Santa Rosa County

2015 Cuyahoga County Youth Risk Behavior Survey: Overall Prevalence

Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Risk and Consequences for California Counties

Relationship of Gender to Licit and Illicit Drug Use among Adolescents. Katherine Haas

Core Alcohol and Drug Survey - Long Form. Consortium Number = Institution Number = Number of Surveys =

Table 1. Weapon-Carrying & Safety San Diego Youth Risk Behavior Survey,

Illinois State University (Online)

2002 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey

T hirteenth BIENNIAL. 3Statewide Survey. of California Students. in Grades 7, 9 and 11. Tables. WestEd Greg Austin and Rodney Skager

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Miami-Dade County Report

Core Alcohol and Drug Survey - Long Form. Consortium Number = Institution Number = Number of Surveys = 6905

2006 Florida Youth Substance Abuse Survey. Collier County Report

National Data

2014 FLORIDA YOUTH SUBSTANCE ABUSE SURVEY. Escambia County

[ ASSESSING THE BURDEN OF ILLICIT DRUGS AND ALCOHOL ABUSE:] Macomb County Office of Substance Abuse. A Focus on Heroin and Prescription Drug Abuse

Submitted to the District of Columbia Department of Health Addiction Prevention and Recovery Administration by the Center for Substance Abuse

Transcription:

bulletin CJ Criminal Justice Research Division, SANDAG Drug Use and Other Risk Factors Among Juveniles Arrested in San Diego County in 2003 December 2004 Cynthia Burke, Ph.D., Division Director 401 B Street Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101 (619) 699-1900 A SANDAG CJ BULLETIN

DRUG USE AND OTHER RISK FACTORS AMONG JUVENILES ARRESTED IN SAN DIEGO COUNTY IN 2003 INTRODUCTION same time period, it may be the case that juveniles being booked into Juvenile Hall In 2003, 360 juveniles who were arrested and booked into San Diego County s Juvenile Hall were interviewed (within 48 hours of booking) as part of SANDAG s in 2003 have a greater number of issues, including substance use, that need to be addressed. In addition, three percent of the youth interviewed in 2003 tested Substance Abuse Monitoring (SAM) positive for cocaine, one percent for PCP, project. Of these 360, 344 also provided a and one percent for heroin (not shown). urine sample for analysis (282 boys and 62 girls). Figure 1 MORE JUVENILES HAVE TESTED SANDAG has conducted interviews with POSITIVE FOR DRUGS SINCE 2000 the arrestee population since 1987. When the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) discontinued funding for the juvenile component of the Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring (ADAM) project in 2003, the California Border Alliance Group (CBAG) provided financial support to keep this important data collection effort going. With this local funding, we were able to revise the juvenile interview instrument to include additional questions of interest pertaining to risk. This second in a series of CJ research bulletins on 2003 drug use among the arrestee population includes information regarding drug use among these juveniles, as well as other risk factors. 5 4 3 1 46% 42% 11% 51% 45% 11% 52% 46% 12% 2000 2001 2002 2003 Any Drug Meth TOTAL = 302-354 56% 49% 15% Any drug includes marijuana, cocaine, opiates, PCP, and methamphetamine. PERCENT POSITIVE TRENDS The percents of juveniles who have tested positive for any drug, marijuana, and meth have all increased over the past four years. As Figure 1 shows, over half (56%) of the youth interviewed in 2003 tested positive for some type of drug, 49 percent were positive for marijuana, and 15 percent were positive for meth. Since juvenile arrests were down during the LIFETIME SUBSTANCE USE Overall, 76 percent of the youth interviewed in 2003 reported that they had ever tried tobacco, 88 percent alcohol, 82 percent marijuana, and 28 percent methamphetamine. Other drugs that had been tried at some time by less than one in five of the youth surveyed included cocaine (16%), mushrooms (14%), inhalants (13%), ecstasy (12%), 3

rohypnol (1), crack (9%), LSD (6%), and heroin (3%) (not shown). However, lifetime experience varied with the age of the juvenile as Figure 2 shows. As one would expect, the percent of youth that had tried each substance increased with each older age group. However, it is worth noting that around two-thirds of youth ages 11 to 13 had tried alcohol, tobacco, and marijuana at least once. These statistics are disturbing due to the higher likelihood of dependency associated with early use (before age 15). 1 The greatest increase across the age groups was for meth, with 39 percent of those 16 and older reporting they had tried this drug at least once. Figure 2 YOUTH 16 YEARS AND OLDER MOST LIKELY TO HAVE TRIED ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS 14 and older to data collected during the same time period through the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS) in San Diego City high schools by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). While it is important to note that different methodologies (e.g., surveying versus interviewing the youth in person, phrasing questions in different ways, only surveying students in the City of San Diego) could affect the pattern of results, it is not surprising that the percents of SAM youth surveyed who had ever tried these substances and had used them in the last 30 days were higher than of those interviewed in the school setting since these youth were selected due to their contact with the juvenile justice system. Figure 3 SAM YOUTH 14 YEARS AND OLDER MORE LIKELY TO REPORT DRUG USE HISTORIES 10 8 4 69% 62% 84% 67% 86% 93% 67% 81% 86% 16% 15% 39% 10 8 4 9 84% 75% 74% 78% 43% 39% 3 22% 8% Tobacco Alcohol Meth Alcohol Alcohol 30 Day 30 Days Meth 11 to 13 14 to 15 16 & Older SAM 14+ YRBS TOTAL = 344 How did this arrestee sample compare to youth in the general population? Figure 3 compares 2003 SAM data for youth ages 1 Center for Substance Abuse Research (November 8, 2004). Cesar Fax. Volume 13, Issue 45. University of Maryland, College, Park., CDC Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2003 Data FACTORS PREDICTIVE OF DRUG USE To determine what other factors, besides age, were related to ever trying a drug or for testing positive for it, additional analyses were conducted. As the 4

following three figures show, we found three youth characteristics that were consistent predictors of drug use: not being enrolled in school, being involved in a gang, and having parents who use drugs. These findings suggest that it is important to identify these risk factors in youth so that substance abuse issues can be targeted at an early point in time and further justice system contact avoided. Figure 6 YOUTH WITH PARENTS WHO USE DRUGS MORE LIKELY TO USE DRUGS 10 8 4 77% 95% 25% 4 43% 64% 14% 22% Figure 4 YOUTH NOT IN SCHOOL MORE LIKELY TO USE DRUGS Meth No Parent Use (n=243-244) Positive Positive Meth Parent Use (n=74-75) 10 8 73% 88% 86% 97% 52% 4 Tobacco Alcohol Currently Enrolled (n=279-280) 23% Meth 13% 29% Positive Meth Not in School (n=63-64) Figure 5 YOUTH IN GANGS MORE LIKELY TO USE DRUGS 10 8 7 82% 8 95% 74% 91% OTHER RISK FACTORS As previously noted, with the advent of the new SAM instrument, a number of new questions were added to the juvenile survey. From the responses to these questions, new indicators of risk among this population have become available, which are summarized in Table 1. The most common risk factor, reported by 88 percent, was having a history of truancy. In addition, over two-thirds (68%) had been arrested and over half (55%) had served time before. 4 22% 35% Tobacco Alcohol Meth No Gang Association (n=174) Gang Association (n=169) 5

Table 1 ARRESTED YOUTH INDICATE PAST RISKY BEHAVIOR IN A NUMBER OF AREAS 88% Reported a history of truancy 68% Had been arrested at least once before 55% Have served time before 48% Don t like reading for fun 47% Have gotten into trouble with their parents for drinking/using drugs 45% Have ridden in a car with a driver who was drinking/using drugs 41% Have gotten sick or had a hang-over 39% Have sold drugs or acted as a middleman 37% Later felt bad about something they did while drunk/high 35% Have gone to school drunk or high 33% Have gotten in a physical fight while drinking/using drugs 26% Have not remembered what happened while they were drinking or using drugs 24% Have brought a weapon to school 24% Have missed school because of drinking or using drugs 22% Have driven a car while or after drinking/using drugs 21% Were diagnosed with Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) 19% Have passed out while drinking/using drugs 16% Have dropped out of school or been expelled 1 Have a child or are currently pregnant (or have a girlfriend who is) PERCEIVED RISK AND AVAILABILITY OF DRUGS Two of the new questions on the 2003 revised instrument asked youth who had reported using a substance in the past year (1) how bad they thought it was for them and (2) how easy it was to obtain. Both ratings were made on a four-point scale. As Figure 7 shows, while almost nine in ten meth users thought this drug was extremely bad or very bad for them and three-quarters felt the same about tobacco, less than half (45%) gave these ratings to alcohol and only onethird (32%) gave it to marijuana. This finding suggests the need for more information campaigns regarding the negative health effects associated with marijuana. Equally disturbing, threequarters or more reported that it was easy or very easy to get these substances. Figure 7 YOUTH REPORT DRUGS ARE EASY TO OBTAIN AND DON T THINK THEY ARE EQUALLY BAD FOR THEM 10 8 4 75% 89% 45% 77% 32% 75% 87% Tobacco Alcohol Meth Drug is Bad Drug is Easy to Obtain TOTAL = 91-279 75% 6

GENDER DIFFERENCES While there were no significant differences in drug use between the boys and girls surveyed through SAM in 2003 [with the exception that on average, girls tried meth approximately one year earlier in life (13.48) than boys (14.49)], the two did differ in other areas. Specifically, girls were: less likely to have a stable residence in the past 30 days (23% versus 6% of boys); more likely to have been bullied (31% versus 19% of boys); more likely to report having ever run away from home (71% compared to 38% of boys); and 23 percent for some other type of offense (e.g., citation), 9 percent for a status offense (e.g., curfew violation), and 7 percent for a drug/alcohol offense. The average age of these youth was 15.93 years, with a range from 11.26 to 18.64 years old. FUTURE BULLETINS Future research bulletins will be released over the next few months summarizing 2003 SAM data related specifically to methamphetamine use and drug markets in San Diego County. Bulletins with 2004 data will also be available in early 2005. more likely to report that their parents had ever used drugs (33%) and had abused alcohol (39%) compared to boys (21% and 21%, respectively). These increased risk factors for girls are important for those who work with this population to take into account when trying to meet the unique needs of female youth in the juvenile justice system. SAMPLE DESCRIPTION About half (46%) of the youth interviewed in 2003 were Hispanic, 24 percent were Black, 22 percent were White, and 8 percent identified with another ethnic group. About one-third (34%) of these youth were arrested for a violent offense, 27 percent for a property offense, 7