Outcomes of Paediatric Cochlear implantation in Single-Sided Deafness or very Asymmetrical Hearing Loss (SSD/AHL)

Similar documents
Issues in pre- and postopera/ve counselling and clinical management for children with Single Sided Deafness/ Asymmetric Hearing Loss

Cochlear Implants and SSD: Initial Findings With Adults: Implications for Children

Acoustic and Electric Same Ear Hearing in Patients with a Standard Electrode Array

Longer term functional outcomes and everyday listening performance for young children through to. young adults using bilateral implants

Cochlear Implantation for Single-Sided Deafness in Children and Adolescents

Current evidence for Implantation under 12 months: Australian experience

Evidence based selection of hearing aids and features

Can adolescents and young adults with prelingual hearing loss benefit from a second, sequential cochlear implant?

Self-Assessment of Sound Quality and Hearing Device Satisfaction in Older Adult Cochlear Implant Listeners

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Academic in Confidence data removed

Comparing Speech Perception Abilities of Children with Cochlear Implants and Digital Hearing Aids

Responding to the needs of families of children with unaidable mild and borderline hearing losses

Localization Abilities after Cochlear Implantation in Cases of Single-Sided Deafness

Practical Grading System for Evaluating Cisplatin Ototoxicity in Children

BORDERLINE PATIENTS AND THE BRIDGE BETWEEN HEARING AIDS AND COCHLEAR IMPLANTS

Department of Otolaryngology, The University of Melbourne. Keywords: hearing impairment, bilateral cochlear implants, children, localization, speech

EHDI in Michigan. Introduction. EHDI Goals and Communication Options. Review of EHDI Goals. Effects of Universal Newborn Hearing Screening (UNHS)

Combining Residual Hearing with Electric Stimulation: Results from Pediatric & Adult CI Recipients

Bilateral cochlear implantation in children identified in newborn hearing screening: Why the rush?

Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation: Benefits of Bilateral Acoustic Hearing

Cochlear Implantation for Pediatric Patients with Single-Sided Deafness

HOW TO IMPROVE COCHLEAR IMPLANT IN ADULT

BAA, Manchester, 2013 Does amplification improve speech in noise perception and localisation accuracy of children with unilateral hearing loss?

Robert 11 years old, has a hearing impairment*

Making connections. Bilateral Cochlear Implant Audit

An Update on Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder in Children

HOW TO IMPROVE COCHLEAR IMPLANT IN ADULT

Effects of Setting Thresholds for the MED- EL Cochlear Implant System in Children

A PROPOSED MODEL OF SPEECH PERCEPTION SCORES IN CHILDREN WITH IMPAIRED HEARING

The Use of FM Technology in school-aged children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Outcomes in Implanted Teenagers Who Do Not Meet the UK Adult Candidacy Criteria

Analysis of the Audio Home Environment of Children with Normal vs. Impaired Hearing

Outline ANATOMY OF EAR. All about Cochlear implants/why does this child not have a Cochlear Implant?

Is the Referral Pathway a Barrier to Candidacy Evaluation for Cochlear Implantation in Adults with a Postlingual Severe To Profound Hearing Loss?

1 Cochlear and the elliptical logo are trademarks of Cochlear Limited. Registred in UK No

Optimizing Dynamic Range in Children Using the Nucleus Cochlear Implant

Adapting to bilateral cochlear implants: Early post-operative device use by children receiving

Cochlear Implant Candidacy Programming Protocol, Adult Ear & Hearing Center for Neurosciences

Fitting of the Hearing System Affects Partial Deafness Cochlear Implant Performance

Hearing the Universal Language: Music and Cochlear Implants

How is hearing measured?

Measuring listening effort expended by adolescents and young adults with a unilateral or. bilateral cochlear implants or normal hearing

Indications and contra-indications of auditory brainstem implants. Systematic review and illustrative cases

Speech perception of hearing aid users versus cochlear implantees

Everyday listening performance of children before and after receiving a second cochlear implant:

Teaching students in VET who have a hearing loss: Glossary of Terms

THE ROLE OF VISUAL SPEECH CUES IN THE AUDITORY PERCEPTION OF SYNTHETIC STIMULI BY CHILDREN USING A COCHLEAR IMPLANT AND CHILDREN WITH NORMAL HEARING

Programs and services for people with vision or hearing loss

Online Courses for Parents and Professionals Who Want to Know More About Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing

9/13/2017. When to consider CI or BAHA evaluation? Krissa Downey, AuD, CCC A

Comparison of Speech Perception & Functional Listening Performance according to Inter-implant Intervals in Sequential Bilateral Cochlear Implantations

Differential-Rate Sound Processing for Cochlear Implants

Peter S Roland M.D. UTSouthwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas Developments

Hearing loss and travel: Assessing the hearing needs of travelers at airports

Hearing Screening, Diagnostics and Intervention

Cochlear implants. Carol De Filippo Viet Nam Teacher Education Institute June 2010

Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants

Bilateral Cochlear Implant Guidelines Gavin Morrison St Thomas Hearing Implant Centre London, UK

SUPPORTING TERTIARY STUDENTS WITH HEARING IMPAIRMENT

Program. Setting Appropriate Expectations and Communication Goals with a Cochlear Implant. Name Title

Long-term Hearing Preservation Outcomes after Cochlear Implantation for Electric-Acoustic Stimulation

Special Services. Deaf & Hard of Hearing. Presentation for SEAC March 20, 2013

Long-term experiences of cochlear implanta4on in adults with acquired single-sided deafness. and incapacita4ng 4nnitus.

CORTICAL AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL (CAEP) AND BEHAVIOURAL MEASURES OF AUDITORY FUNCTION IN AN ADULT WITH A SINGLE SIDED DEAFNESS: CASE STUDY

Paediatric Hearing aid Passport for single sided deafness

Our experiences with cochlear implanta3on in single sided deafness pa3ents

Manchester Paediatric Cochlear Implant Programme

Paediatric cochlear implantation

Diagnosis and Management of ANSD: Outcomes of Cochlear Implants versus Hearing Aids

Implants. Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Presentation Tips. Becoming Familiar with Cochlear. Implants

Slide 1 REVISITING CANDIDACY: EXPANDING CRITERIA FOR COCHLEAR IMPLANTS. Slide 2. Slide 3. Cochlear Implant History. Cochlear Implant History

California s Cochlear Implant Program for Children: Trends from the EHDI Program

Manchester Adult Cochlear Implant Programme

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND AUDITORY BRAINSTEM IMPLANTS

Cochlear Implant Technology

SPEECH PERCEPTION IN A 3-D WORLD

Assessing Hearing and Speech Recognition

Impact of the presence of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder on outcomes at 3 years of age

Sonia Grewal, Au.D Professional Education Manager Hearing HealthCare Providers 2017 Conference WIDEX CROS & BICROS

Introduction. Performance Outcomes for Borderline Cochlear Implant Candidates. Introduction. Introduction. Introduction.

Emissions are low-intensity sounds that may be detected in the external ear canal by a microphone

Interpreting Speech Results to Optimise Hearing aid Fittings

ive your child the gift of hearing A parents guide to hearing health

Cochlear implants for children and adults with severe to profound deafness

Your Hearing Assessment Report

Julia Sarant, David Harris, Lisa Bennet, Laura Sinclair, Mansze Mok, Manasi Canagasabey, Sharyn Bant, Robert Cowan

Putting it all together The role of functional listening and objective testing in infants

P1 latency in cochlear implant candidates. Peter S Roland MD UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas

Cochlear Implants: The Role of the Early Intervention Specialist. Carissa Moeggenberg, MA, CCC-A February 25, 2008

SIGNS OF BINAURAL PROCESSING WITH BILATERAL COCHLEAR IMPLANTS IN THE CASE OF SOMEONE WITH MORE THAN 50 YEARS OF UNILATERAL DEAFNESS

Title: Preliminary speech recognition results after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral hearing loss: a case report

teacher's training pack 23/8/07 09:14 Page 41 The ear esource R

Why directional microphone technology for young children?

Cochlear Physiology & Speech Perception

Quality standards for cochlear implantation in children and young adults

Nucleus Hybrid L24 cochlear implant CI24REH. Professional Package Insert

Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes in Pediatric Recipients of Cochlear Implants

Working Together: The Information Exchange Between Families, Pediatric Audiologists and Early Interventionists to Maximize Outcomes

STUDY OF MAIS (MEANINGFUL AUDITORY INTEGRATION SCALE) SCORE POST UNILAT- ERAL COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN PRELINGUAL DEAF PATIENTS

Policy #: 018 Latest Review Date: June 2014

Transcription:

Outcomes of Paediatric Cochlear implantation in Single-Sided Deafness or very Asymmetrical Hearing Loss (SSD/AHL) Karyn Galvin 1, Michelle Todorov 1, Rebecca Farrell 2, Robert Briggs 1,2,3,4, Markus Dahm 2, Jaime Leigh 2 1 Dept Audiology & Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Australia 2 Cochlear Implant Clinic, Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital, Melbourne, Australia 3 HEARing CRC, Melbourne, Australia 4 Dept Surgery, The University of Melbourne, Australia

Off-label declaration the work reported here involves off-label use of the Nucleus CI

Disclosures Karyn Galvin: University of Melbourne Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology received project-based funding from Cochlear Ltd. Michelle Todorov: University of Melbourne Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology received project-based funding from Cochlear Ltd. Rebecca Farrell: none Robert Briggs: University of Melbourne Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology received project-based funding from Cochlear Ltd.; A/Prof Briggs acts as a consultant to Cochlear Ltd. Markus Dahm: none Jaime Leigh: none

Project aims document families preoperative expectations & postoperative experiences conduct a broad assessment of CI benefit consider impact of child demographics

Selection criteria profound hearing loss in one ear (onset <12y age) contralateral ear does not fulfil current CI criteria

LVAS (progressive) HL Detected 2y9m Left HA worn full time P1: Preoperative Audiogram Hearing Level (db HL) AGE AT CI: 10y4m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Frequency (Hz) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

P1 Results: Functional outcomes Time point Parent report From switch-on adapted easily to CI usage full-time At 6m At 12m At 21m significantly reduced reliance on lipreading, FM system, and positioning speaker on good side improved ability to follow group conversation & locate speaker within the home very reliant on CI (preferred over HA)

Speech perception test setup noise centre Co-incident speech & noise: CI speech noise Better ear noise contra Speech at 0 0 & noise 90 0 contralateral to CI: CI speech noise Better ear

P1 Results: Speech perception (4AFC spondees)

Spatial hearing test setup: Localisation 180 0 8-loudspeaker array

P1 Results: 8-loudspeaker localisation HA 24m Postop HA+ CI 24m Postop Response Loudspeaker Identified by Child 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Response Loudspeaker Identified by Child 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Presenting Loudspeaker 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Presenting Loudspeaker 8

Speech, Spatial & Qualities of Hearing Scale parent rates child s performance in everyday listening situations three separate areas of assessment speech spatial hearing qualities of hearing

P1 Results: SSQ-Parent Similar pattern of results with child selfreport version * p<0.05

Summary of Results Participant & Postoperative time point Usage Functional reports Speech perception in noise testing Spatial hearing testing Everyday listening (SSQ) Quality of life Classroom engagement Classroom participation P1 24m X X

CMV; premature HL Detected 2y9m Right HA worn full time P2: Preoperative Audiogram Hearing Level (db HL) AGE AT CI: 6y11m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Frequency (Hz) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 V V V V 8000

P2 Results: Functional outcomes Time point By 3m usage 70% Parent report At 12m child generally wearing CI without prompting Clinician report no evident CI benefit Early months data logging 1.5hr/day increase in usage over time; may be due to better tolerance of lower level maps trialed to promote usage

P1 & P2: Summary of Results Participant & Postoperative time point P1 24m P2 12m Usage?? Functional reports X Speech perception in noise testing X X Spatial hearing testing X Everyday listening (SSQ) X Quality of life - Classroom engagement X - Classroom participation -

Meningitis at 6wks P3: Preoperative Audiogram Hearing Level (db HL) AGE AT CI: 3m (ossification evident) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Frequency (Hz) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 X 8000

P3 Results: Functional outcomes Time point From switch-on Parent report adapted easily to CI use At 6m usage 6hr/day WITH CI ON: more content & engaged increased frequency & variety of babbling better able to identify sound direction By 12m full-time use of HA+CI (HA fitted 7m) speech & language progressing well

P1 to P3: Results Summary Participant & Postoperative time point P1 24m P2 12m Usage?? Functional reports X Speech in noise testing X X - P3 12m Spatial hearing testing X (LvsR) Everyday listening (SSQ) X - Quality of life - - Classroom engagement X - - Classroom participation - -

Family Hx HL Detected 3y6m P4: Preoperative Audiogram Hearing Level (db HL) AGE AT CI: 10y4m 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Frequency (Hz) 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000

P4: Functional outcomes Time point Parent report From switch-on usage 8.5hr/day happy to wear CI but hides it with hoodie By 6m usage full-time takes responsibility for CI no evident CI benefit

P4 Results: 8-loudspeaker localisation N H 6 months post op. N H + CI 6 months post op. 8 8 Loudspeaker Response. 7 6 5 4 3 2 Loudspeaker Response 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Presenting Loudspeaker 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Presenting Loudspeaker 8

P1 to P4: Results Summary Participant & Postoperative time point P1 24m P2 12m P3 12m Usage?? Functional reports X X Speech in noise testing X X - X Spatial hearing testing X X Everyday listening (SSQ) X - X Quality of life - - - Classroom engagement X - - - Classroom participation - - - P4 6m

Participant & Postop time point P1 24m P2 12m P3 12m P4 12m Usage? Functional reports X X Speech in noise testing X X - X Spatial hearing testing X X Everyday listening (SSQ) X - X Quality of life - - - Classroom engagement X - - - Classroom participation - - - P5 5m P1 to P7: Results Summary P6 6m P7 7m Etiology Family Hx Meningitis LVA Onset Assumed cong (diag 7y) 2y10m 6y Age at CI 11y10m 6y0m 15y5m Usage X

In conclusion CI for SSD/AHL presents challenges and opportunities careful research is required to: evaluate benefit (administer broad assessment protocol) track progress longer term (usage) determine influential factors end result of research must be evidence-based pre and postoperative counselling and clinical management practices

Acknowledgements contribution of: participating children and their families Staff of the Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital Cochlear Implant Clinic, Melbourne financial supporters of the work reported: University of Melbourne Department of Audiology & Speech Pathology Royal Victorian Eye and Ear Hospital William Angliss Charitable Fund Collier Charitable Fund THANK YOU!