ALLHAT. Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic

Similar documents
Antihypertensive Trial Design ALLHAT

Randomized Design of ALLHAT BP Trial

ALLHAT. ALLHAT Antihypertensive Trial Results by Baseline Diabetic & Fasting Glucose Status

ALLHAT Role of Diuretics in the Prevention of Heart Failure - The Antihypertensive and Lipid- Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial

Pre-ALLHAT Drug Use. Diuretics. ß-Blockers. ACE Inhibitors. CCBs. Year. % of Treated Patients on Medication. CCBs. Beta Blockers.

ALLHAT RENAL DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED INTO 4 GROUPS BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (GFR)

ALLHAT. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. National Institutes of Health. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES WHERE ARE WE IN 2014

APPENDIX D: PHARMACOTYHERAPY EVIDENCE

TREATMENT AND COMPLICAtions

Hypertension Update 2009

Outcomes in Hypertensive Black and Nonblack Patients Treated With Chlorthalidone, Amlodipine, and Lisinopril JAMA. 2005;293:

ALLHAT Investigators Report 10-Year Follow-up and Stand by Diuretics as First-Step Antihypertensive Treatment

Hypertension. Does it Matter What Medications We Use? Nishant K. Sekaran, M.D. M.Sc. Intermountain Heart Institute

Hypertension Guidelines: Are We Pressured to Change? Oregon Cardiovascular Symposium Portland, Oregon June 6, Financial Disclosures

Managing Hypertension in Diabetes Sean Stewart, PharmD, BCPS, BCACP, CLS Internal Medicine Park Nicollet Clinic St Louis Park.

JNC Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

JNC 8 -Controversies. Sagren Naidoo Nephrologist CMJAH

Hypertension Management: A Moving Target

DISCLOSURE PHARMACIST OBJECTIVES 9/30/2014 JNC 8: A REVIEW OF THE LONG-AWAITED/MUCH-ANTICIPATED HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES. I have nothing to disclose.

Treating Hypertension in Individuals with Diabetes

Sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

2014 HYPERTENSION GUIDELINES

Talking about blood pressure

Management of Hypertension

Drug-Induced Diabetes May Not Be Harmful But Should Be Prevented. Jeffrey A. Cutler, MD, MPH

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Jackson T. Wright, Jr. MD, PhD

Is there a mechanism of interaction between hypertension and dyslipidaemia?

VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Hypertension - Pocket Guide Update 2004 Revision July 2005

In the Literature 1001 BP of 1.1 mm Hg). The trial was stopped early based on prespecified stopping rules because of a significant difference in cardi

Diabetes and Hypertension

ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Understanding the importance of blood pressure control An overview of new guidelines: How do they impact daily current management?

Hypertension Update Clinical Controversies Regarding Age and Race

Preventing and Treating High Blood Pressure

The Latest Generation of Clinical

First line treatment of primary hypertension

Hypertension Update Warwick Jaffe Interventional Cardiologist Ascot Hospital

Update in Cardiology Pharmacologic Management of Cardiovascular Risk. Christopher C. Roe, MSN, ACNP

7/7/ CHD/MI LVH and LV dysfunction Dysrrhythmias Stroke PVD Renal insufficiency and failure Retinopathy. Normal <120 Prehypertension

Cedars Sinai Diabetes. Michael A. Weber

The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to

The Indian Polycap Study 1 & 2 (TIPS 1 & 2) and The International Polycap Study 3 & 4 (TIPS 3 & 4)

Hypertension targets: sorting out the confusion. Brian Rayner, Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of Cape Town

Managing Hypertension in 2016

Should we prescribe aspirin and statins to all subjects over 65? (Or even all over 55?) Terje R.Pedersen Oslo University Hospital Oslo, Norway

Hypertension (JNC-8)

Modern Management of Hypertension

Management of Lipid Disorders and Hypertension: Implications of the New Guidelines

Improving Medical Statistics and Interpretation of Clinical Trials

Clinical Updates in the Treatment of Hypertension JNC 7 vs. JNC 8. Lauren Thomas, PharmD PGY1 Pharmacy Practice Resident South Pointe Hospital

By Prof. Khaled El-Rabat

Hypertension in 2015: SPRINT-ing ahead of JNC-8. MAJ Charles Magee, MD MPH FACP Director, WRNMMC Hypertension Clinic

BLOOD PRESSURE-LOWERING TREATMENT

New Lipid Guidelines. PREVENTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE IN WOMEN: Implications of the New Guidelines for Hypertension and Lipids.

Difficult-to-Control & Resistant Hypertension. Anthony Viera, MD, MPH, FAHA Professor and Chair

Hypertension and obesity. Dr Wilson Sugut Moi teaching and referral hospital

Hypertension and Diabetes Should we be SPRINTING or Reaching an ACCORD?

4/4/17 HYPERTENSION TARGETS: WHAT DO WE DO NOW? SET THE STAGE BP IN CLINICAL TRIALS?

Hypertension: 2016 Clinical Update

Modern Management of Hypertension: Where Do We Draw the Line?

Hypertension. Most important public health problem in developed countries

Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)

MODERN MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION Where Do We Draw the Line? Disclosure. No relevant financial relationships. Blood Pressure and Risk

Hypertension in the Era of ACC/AHA: Practice Changing Evidence and Recommendations

Outcomes and Perspectives of Single-Pill Combination Therapy for the modern management of hypertension

STANDARD treatment algorithm mmHg

Abbreviations Cardiology I

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Clinical Trial - ALLHAT. Mortality and Morbidity During and After Antihypertensive. and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial

Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults

Hypertension Pharmacotherapy: A Practical Approach

ALLHAT and its implications in the diabetic population

Highlights of the new blood pressure and cholesterol guidelines: A whole new philosophy. Jeremy L. Johnson, PharmD, BCACP, CDE, BC-ADM

Difficult to Treat Hypertension

Hypertension Management in Diabetic Patients

Update on Current Trends in Hypertension Management

2/10/2014. Hypertension: Highlights of Hypertension Guidelines: Making the Most of Limited Evidence. Issues with contemporary guidelines

VALUE OF ACEI IN THE MANAGEMENT OF HYPERTENSION

Jared Moore, MD, FACP

Diversity and HTN: Approaches to optimal BP control in AfricanAmericans

Clinical Recommendations: Patients with Periodontitis

Hypertension in the Elderly. John Puxty Division of Geriatrics Center for Studies in Aging and Health, Providence Care

Combination Therapy for Hypertension

Objectives. Describe results and implications of recent landmark hypertension trials

Hypertension 2015: Recent Evidence that Will Change Your Practice

New Hypertension Guideline Recommendations for Adults July 7, :45-9:30am

The CARI Guidelines Caring for Australians with Renal Impairment. Specific effects of calcium channel blockers in diabetic nephropathy GUIDELINES

Masked Hypertension. Why Should We Care? Dr. Peter J. Lin Director Primary Care Initiatives - Canadian Heart Research Centre

h i g h b l o o d p r e s s u r e

Hypertension and Cardiovascular Disease

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

New Recommendations for the Treatment of Hypertension: From Population Salt Reduction to Personalized Treatment Targets

Large therapeutic studies in elderly patients with hypertension

Management of Hypertension in special groups. DR-Mohammed Salah Assistant Lecturer of Cardiology Mansoura University

Hypertension Update. Objectives 4/28/2015. Beverly J. Mathis, D.O. OOA May 2015

Causes of Poor BP control Rates

Treating Hypertension in 2018: What Makes the Most Sense Today?

Transcription:

1 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health Major Outcomes in High Risk Hypertensive Patients Randomized to Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Calcium Channel Blocker vs Diuretic The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial () The Collaborative Research Group Sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute www.allhat.org JAMA 2002;288:2981-2997 2997

2 Antihypertensive Trial Design Randomized, double-blind, multi-center clinical trial Determine whether occurrence of fatal CHD or nonfatal MI is lower for high-risk hypertensive patients treated with newer agents (CCB, ACEI, alpha-blocker) compared with a diuretic 42,418 high-risk hypertensive patients 55 years

3 Background In addition to their BP lowering potential all antihypertensive agents have other important mechanisms of action and indications. These actions may convey benefits or risks independent of BP lowering By having a common BP goal for all treatment arms, aimed to evaluate the health effects of these non-bp actions

4 Secondary Outcomes All-cause mortality Stroke Combined CHD nonfatal MI, CHD death, coronary revascularization, hospitalized angina Combined CVD (CHD, stroke, coronary revascularizations, heart failure [treated nonhospitalized, hospitalized, fatal], angina (treated non-hospitalized, hospitalized), peripheral arterial disease (revascularization procedure)

5 Secondary Outcomes (Continued) HQOL (Health-related quality of life) GI Bleeding Costs

6 Step 1 Treatment Protocol Step 1 Agent Initial Dose* Dose 1* Dose 2* Dose 3* Chlorthalidone 12.5 12.5 12.5 25 Amlodipine 2.5 2.5 5 10 Lisinopril 10 10 20 40 Doxazosin 1 2 4 8 * mg/day

7 Step Up Treatment Protocol Step 2 Agents: Dose 1* Dose 2* Dose 3* Reserpine 0.05 qd 0.1 qd 0.2 qd or 0.1 qod Clonidine (oral) 0.1 bid 0.2 bid 0.3 bid Atenolol 25 qd 50 qd 100 qd Step 3 Agent: Hydralazine 25 bid 50 bid 100 bid *All doses in mg

8 Baseline Characteristics Chlorthalidone 15,255 Amlodipine 9,048 Lisinopril 9,054 Mean SBP/DBP 146 / 84 146 / 84 146 / 84 Treated (90%) 145 / 83 145 / 83 145 / 84 Untreated (10%) 156 / 89 157 / 90 156 / 89 Mean age, y 67 67 67 Black, % 35 36 36 Women, % 47 47 46 Current smoking % 22 22 22 History of CHD, % 26 24 25 Type 2 diabetes, % 36 37 36

9 On Step 1 or Equivalent Treatment by Antihypertensive Treatment Group 100.0 80.0 60.0 % 40.0 20.0 0.0 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 4 Years 5 Years Chlor 87.1 84.7 82.7 80.8 80.5 Aml 87.6 85.2 83.2 80.5 80.4 Lis 82.4 78.4 77.1 74.8 72.6

10 BP Results by Treatment Group Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 150 145 C A L BL 146.2 146.2 146.4 6M 138.2 140.0 141.4 1Y 136.6 138.3 139.7 3Y 134.6 135.4 136.4 5Y 134.1 134.9 136.1 90 85 C A L BL 84.0 83.9 84.1 6M 80.1 79.7 80.8 1Y 79.2 78.5 79.7 3Y 77.1 76.1 77.2 5Y 75.4 74.5 75.4 mm Hg BP 140 mm Hg BP 80 135 75 130 70 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years Compared to chlorthalidone: SBP significantly higher in the amlodipine group (~1 mm Hg) and the lisinopril group (~2 mm Hg). Compared to chlorthalidone: DBP significantly lower in the amlodipine group (~1 mm Hg).

11 Blood Pressure Control 1.6 = mean number of drugs DBP<90 SBP<140 BP<140/90 Percent 100 80 60 40 20 92% 86% 88% 90% 91% 68% 58 60 64 67 67 66 62 65 55 58 2.0 31 27 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.4 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 @ 5 years: Years of Follow-up 62% were on >2 2 drugs 30% were on 1 drug and controlled Cushman, et al. J Clin Hypertens 2002;4:393 4:393-404404

12 Biochemical Results Serum cholesterol- mg/dl Baseline 4 Years Serum cholesterol - > 240 mg/dl Baseline 3838 (26.5) 4 Years 1223 (14.4) Serum potassium mmol/l Baseline 4 Years Serum potassium <3.5mEq/L Baseline 4 Years * p<.05 compared to chlorthalidone Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461-470 Chlorthalidone 216.1 (43.8) 197.2 (42.1) 4.3 (0.7) 4.1 (0.7) 493 (3.4) 707 (8.5) Amlodipine 216.5 (44.1) 195.6 (41.0)* 2284 (26.6) 673 (13.4) 4.3 (0.7) 4.4 (0.7)* 292 (3.4) 93 (1.9) Lisinopril 215.6 (42.4) 195.0 (40.6)* 2178 (25.4) 603 (12.8) 4.4 (0.7)* 4.5 (0.7)* 223 (2.6) 37 (0.8)

13 USE OF POTASSIUM SUPPLEMENTATION Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 12 11 % on potassium suppl. 10 8 6 4 2 2.2 0.6 0.8 3.6 1.1 1.1 4.6 2.1 1.6 5.4 2.6 1.7 7.9 3.5 2.3 5.9 4 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6

14 Biochemical Results Fasting Glucose mg/dl Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Total Baseline 123.5 (58.3) 123.1 (57.0) 4 Years 126.3 (55.6) 123.7 (52.0) Among baseline nondiabetics with baseline <126 mg/dl Baseline 93.1 (11.7) 93.0 (11.4) 4 Years 104.4 (28.5) 103.1 (27.7) Diabetes Incidence (follow-up fasting glucose 126 mg/dl) 4 Years 11.6% 9.8%* Lisinopril 122.9 (56.1) 121.5 (51.3)* 93.3 (11.8) 100.5 (19.5)* 8.1%* *p<.05 compared to chlorthalidone

15 Renal Outcomes C A L A/C L/C ESRD (Rate/100 # events) 1.8 (0.1) 193 2.1 (0.2) 129 2.0(0.2) 126 RR=1.12 p=.98 RR=1.11 p=0.38 GFR (4 Year) Mean (sd) 70.0 (19.7) 75.1 (20.7) 70.7 (20) p<.001 p=0.03 C = Chlorthalidone; A = Amlodipine; L = Lisinopril

16.2 Cumulative Event Rates for the Primary Outcome (Fatal CHD or Nonfatal MI) by Treatment Group RR (95% CI) p value.16 A/C 0.98 (0.90-1.07) 0.65 Cumulative CHD Event Rate.12.08.04 L/C 0.99 (0.91-1.08) Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 0.81 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years to CHD Event Number at Risk: Chlorthalidone 15,255 14,477 13,820 13,102 11,362 6,340 2,956 209 Amlodipine 9,048 8,576 8,218 7,843 6,824 3,870 1,878 215 Lisinopril 9,054 8,535 8,123 7,711 6,662 3,832 1,770 195

17 Cumulative Event Rates for Stroke by Treatment Group.1 RR (95% CI) p value.08 A/C L/C 0.93 (0.81-1.06) 1.15 (1.02-1.30) 0.28 0.02 Cumulative Stroke Rate.06.04.02 Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years to Stroke Number at risk: Chlor 15,255 14,515 13,934 13,309 11,570 6,385 3,217 567 Amlo 9,048 8,617 8,271 7,949 6,937 3,845 1,813 506 Lisin 9,054 8,543 8,172 7,784 6,765 3,891 1,828 949

18 Stroke Subgroup Comparisons RR (95% CI) Total 0.93 (0.82, 1.06) Age < 65 0.93 (0.73, 1.19) Age >= 65 0.93 (0.81, 1.08) Men 1.00 (0.85, 1.18) Women 0.84 (0.69, 1.03) Black 0.93 (0.76, 1.14) Non-Black 0.93 (0.79, 1.10) Diabetic 0.90 (0.75, 1.08) Non-Diabetic 0.96 (0.81, 1.14) 0.50 1 2 Amlodipine Better Chlorthalidone Better Total 1.15 (1.02, 1.30) Age < 65 1.21 (0.97, 1.52) Age >= 65 1.13 (0.98, 1.30) Men 1.10 (0.94, 1.29) Women 1.22 (1.01, 1.46) Black 1.40 (1.17, 1.68) Non-Black 1.00 (0.85, 1.17) Diabetic 1.07 (0.90, 1.28) Non-Diabetic 1.23 (1.05, 1.44) 0.50 1 2 Lisinopril Better Chlorthalidone Better P =.01 for interaction

19.3.25 Cumulative Event Rates for All-Cause Mortality by Treatment Group A/C L/C RR (95% CI) 0.96 (0.89-1.02) 1.00 (0.94-1.08) p value 0.20 0.90 Cumulative Mortality Rate.2.15.1.05 Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years to Death Number at risk: Chlor 15,255 14,933 14,564 14,077 12,480 7.185 3,523 428 Amlo 9,048 8,847 8,654 8,391 7,442 4,312 2,101 217 Lisin 9,054 8,853 8,612 8,318 7,382 4,304 2,121 144

20 Cumulative Event Rates for Combined CVD by Treatment Group.5 RR (95% CI) p value A/C 1.04 (0.99-1.09) 0.12 Cumulative Combined CVD Event Rate.4.3.2.1 L/C 1.10 (1.05-1.16) Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril <0.001 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years to Combined CVD Event Number at risk: Chlor 15,255 13,752 12,594 11,517 9,643 5,167 2,362 288 Amlo 9,048 8,118 7,451 6,837 5,724 3,049 1,411 153 Lisin 9,054 7,962 7,259 6,631 5,560 3,011 1,375 139

21 Combined CVD Subgroup Comparisons RR (95% CI) Total 1.04 (0.99, 1.09) Age < 65 1.03 (0.94, 1.12) Age >= 65 1.05 (0.99, 1.12) Men 1.04 (0.98, 1.11) Women 1.04 (0.96, 1.13) Black 1.06 (0.96, 1.16) Non-Black 1.04 (0.97, 1.10) Diabetic 1.06 (0.98, 1.15) Non-Diabetic 1.02 (0.96, 1.09) 0.50 1 2 Amlodipine Better Chlorthalidone Better Total 1.10 (1.05, 1.16) Age < 65 1.05 (0.97, 1.15) Age >= 65 1.13 (1.06, 1.20) Men 1.08 (1.02, 1.15) Women 1.12 (1.03, 1.21) Black 1.19 (1.09, 1.30) Non-Black 1.06 (1.00, 1.13) Diabetic 1.08 (1.00, 1.17) Non-Diabetic 1.12 (1.05, 1.19) 0.50 1 2 Lisinopril Better Chlorthalidone Better P =.04 for interaction

22 Cumulative CHF Rate.15.12.09.06.03 Cumulative Event Rates for Heart Failure by Treatment Group A/C L/C RR (95% CI) 1.38 (1.25-1.52) 1.19 (1.07-1.31) Chlorthalidone Amlodipine Lisinopril p value <.001 <.001 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years to HF Number at risk: Chlor 15,255 14,528 13,898 13,224 11,511 6,369 3,016 384 Amlo 9,048 8,535 8,185 7,801 6,785 3,775 1,780 210 Lisin 9,054 8,496 8,096 7,689 6,698 3,789 1,837 313

23 Overall Conclusions Because of the superiority of thiazide-type diuretics in preventing one or more major forms of CVD and their lower cost, they should be the drugs of choice for first-step antihypertensive drug therapy.