AccuScreen ABR Screener

Similar documents
What do you notice? Woodman, Atten. Percept. Psychophys., 2010

Provisional guidelines for using Auditory Steady State Responses (ASSR) in babies. July 2009

AUTOMATED AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE INFORMATION AND GUIDELINES FOR SCREENING HEARING IN BABIES

ABR assesses the integrity of the peripheral auditory system and auditory brainstem pathway.

Updates to NHSP guidance for post-screening diagnostic testing Update 1: August 2015 Author: BSA Electrophysiology Special Interest Group (BSA EP SIG)

Neural Recording Methods

Quick Guide - eabr with Eclipse

AURICAL Plus with DSL v. 5.0b Quick Guide. Doc no /04

The Verification of ABR Response by Using the Chirp Stimulus in Moderate Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Toward Extending Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) Testing to Longer-Latency Equivalent Potentials

EE 4BD4 Lecture 11. The Brain and EEG

But, what about ASSR in AN?? Is it a reliable tool to estimate the auditory thresholds in those category of patients??

BIO-LOGIC PRO NAVIGATOR TRUSTED TECHNOLOGY. RELIABLE RESULTS.

Neuro-Audio Version 2010

The Most Outstanding Features & Benefits of Today s Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP) Systems

III. Comprehensive. Efficient. Auditory EP Testing

Background. Electrophysical tests. HearLab Instrument. - Developed by National Acoustic Laboratories (NAL) - NAL- (Australian population)

James W. Hall III, Ph.D.

Non-sedated ABR evaluation. Yuri Sokolov, Isaac Kurtz, Olena Sokolova, Aaron Steinman, Cameron Mahon Vivosonic Inc.

ABR PTA ASSR Multi-ASSR OAE TEOAE DPOAE SOAE VEMP ECochG MLR P300

Educational Module Tympanometry. Germany D Germering

EPIC-PLUS System for auditory evoked potentials and neuro-otology. PEA - VEMPs ASSR - E-ABR FACIAL NERVE

CE-Chirp. Making ABR fast, accurate and clear! Stimulus Family

Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR): A Beginner's Guide by Douglas L. Beck, AuD, David P. Speidel, MS, Michelle Petrak, PhD

EFFECTS OF NITROUS OXIDE ON AUDITORY CORTICAL EVOKED POTENTIALS AND SUBJECTIVE THRESHOLDS

THRESHOLD PREDICTION USING THE ASSR AND THE TONE BURST CONFIGURATIONS

PERIPHERAL AND CENTRAL AUDITORY ASSESSMENT

(Otoacoustic Emissions and Automated ABR)

Simultaneous multiple stimulation of the auditory steadystate response (ASSR)

Hearing Screening, Diagnostics and Intervention

AUDL GS08/GAV1 Signals, systems, acoustics and the ear. Pitch & Binaural listening

UPDATE ON ELECTROPHYSIOLOGIC MEASURES OF HEARING SENSITIVITY IN INFANTS

GSI AUDIOscreener OAE AND ABR HEARING SCREENING

The Level Specific CE-Chirp

Auditory brainstem responses elicited by embedded narrowband

Recommended Procedure Cochlear Microphonic Testing

Protocol for Fast, Efficient Audiogram Prediction using Electrophysiology. Sponsored By

Infants, auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs), and clinical practice

The PATH AEP technology

An Auditory-Model-Based Electrical Stimulation Strategy Incorporating Tonal Information for Cochlear Implant

Newborn Screening and Middle Ear Problems

Comparison of Binaural Interaction Component (BIC) in Symmetrical and Asymmetrical Hearing Loss: Pilot Study

1- Cochlear Impedance Telemetry

Effect of intensity increment on P300 amplitude

Neurosurgical Review. CE-Chirp ABR in cerebellopontine angle surgery neuromonitoring: technical assessment in four cases.

Emissions are low-intensity sounds that may be detected in the external ear canal by a microphone

Deafness and hearing impairment

SLHS 588A Electrophysiologic Assessment Techniques: FALL Class Meeting: Room 229-SLHS, MW 2:00 to 3:15 p.m; Lab: TBA;

Effects of aging on temporal synchronization of speech in noise investigated in the cortex by using MEG and in the midbrain by using EEG techniques

Bio-logic AuDX PRO FLEX Diagnostic OAE and audiometry Quick start guide

Evoked Potenital Reading Session: BAEPs

Science made smarter. Titan. Advanced made flexible. Impedance, OAE, ABRIS and the revolutionary Wideband Tympanometry in one powerful device

Running head: HEARING-AIDS INDUCE PLASTICITY IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM 1

FINE-TUNING THE AUDITORY SUBCORTEX Measuring processing dynamics along the auditory hierarchy. Christopher Slugocki (Widex ORCA) WAS 5.3.

Update on Frequency Specificity of AEP Measurements

2) What is the most robust distortion product evoked with DPOAEs? A. F1 B. F2 C. 2F1-F2 D. 2F2 F1

fmri (functional MRI)

Evoked Potenital Reading Session: BAEPs

Basic Principles. The Current State of Auditory Steady-State Responses

Titan power The best just got better. Impedance, OAE, ABRIS and the revolutionary Wideband Tympanometry in one powerful device

III. Studying The Brain and Other Structures

Thresholds of Tone Burst Auditory Brainstem Responses for Infants and Young Children with Normal Hearing in Taiwan

The Eclipse High quality evoked potentials at your command. AEP, ASSR, & OAE testing on one dedicated platform

Wheeler, K.S. M.Cl.Sc. (Aud) Candidate School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, U.W.O

The Eclipse Designed to meet your every need. AEP, ASSR, VEMP & OAE testing on one dedicated platform

2/16/2012. Pediatric Auditory Assessment: Using Science to Guide Clinical Practice

Editorial Hearing Aids and the Brain

Ensuring high quality ABR in babies

What you re in for. Who are cochlear implants for? The bottom line. Speech processing schemes for

PURPOSE OF THIS PRESENTATION GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE: FACULTY GUIDELINES DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE: OUTCOMES

Using Electrocochleography to Assess the Afferent Pathway in the Cochlea. Senior Thesis

ESTABLISHING CLINICAL NORMATIVE DATA FOR NEURODIAGNOSTIC AUDITORY BRAINSTEM RESPONSE TESTING FOR THE KORLE-BU TEACHING HOSPITAL

Auditory Assessment Based On EEG

Audiological Diagnosis after Newborn Screening

MADSEN AccuScreen OAE & ABR Screener

International Journal of Audiology 2005; 44:613/624

Quantum Mind Booster User Guide

Bilateral Cochlear Implant Guidelines Gavin Morrison St Thomas Hearing Implant Centre London, UK

Sound Waves. Sensation and Perception. Sound Waves. Sound Waves. Sound Waves

Beyond Blind Averaging: Analyzing Event-Related Brain Dynamics. Scott Makeig. sccn.ucsd.edu

Synaptopathy Research Uwe Andreas Hermann

Normal Ipsilateral/Contralateral Asymmetries in Infant Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses to Air- and Bone-Conduction Stimuli

Binaural Hearing. Why two ears? Definitions

Required Slide. Session Objectives

The Structure and Function of the Auditory Nerve

Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function

STRUCTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM

Audit and Compliance Department 1

Eclipse Evoked Potential System. 10 reasons to choose

Neuro-MEP-Micro EMG EP. 2-Channel Portable EMG and NCS System with a Built-in Miniature Dedicated Keyboard. EMG according to international standards

CLINICAL STATUS OF THE AUDITORY STEADY-STATE RESPONSE IN INFANTS. 1. Department of Communication Pathology, University of Pretoria, South

Study of brainstem evoked response audiometry in sensorineural hearing deafness- A hospital based study

BERA The HOMOTH ABR / BERA- module is a real time brainstem audiometer. It is developed considering the latest knowledge of the ENT research.

first described by Starr 1996 as a subgroup of patients with

Sonic Spotlight. Binaural Coordination: Making the Connection

Improving the diagnostic power of otoacoustic emissions. Arturo Moleti Physics Department University of Roma Tor Vergata

NEURODIAGNOSTIC TECHNOLOGIST SPECIALTY

Titan power The best just got better. Impedance, OAE, ABRIS and the revolutionary Wideband Tympanometry in one powerful device

Outline ANATOMY OF EAR. All about Cochlear implants/why does this child not have a Cochlear Implant?

Transcription:

AccuScreen ABR Screener Test Methods Doc no. 7-50-1015-EN/02 0459

Copyright notice No part of this Manual or program may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of GN Otometrics A/S. Copyright 2013, GN Otometrics A/S Printed in Denmark by GN Otometrics A/S, Denmark All information, illustrations, and specifications in this manual are based on the latest product information available at the time of publication. GN Otometrics A/S reserves the right to make changes at any time without notice. Version release date 22. August 2013 Technical support Please contact your supplier. FM template version: 01-02-2010

Table of Contents AccuScreen ABR Screener Test Methods 1 Test Methods...................................................... 5 1.1 About Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR)................................. 5 1.1.1 How AccuScreen determines a PASS in ABR testing.................... 5 1.1.2 How AccuScreen performs simultaneous binaural ABR tests.............. 6 Index.................................................................. 9 Otometrics 3

Table of Contents AccuScreen ABR Screener Test Methods 4 Otometrics

1 Test Methods 1.1 About Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) Sounds are processed by the different parts of the ear and transformed by the auditory sensory cells to a series of action potentials, which are transmitted to the brain by neural conduction. On their way to the auditory cortex the action potentials pass a number of regions called nuclei, where the coded acoustic information is filtered, processed, compared to other information, and distributed to different pathways. These nuclei are the origin of bursts" of synchronous multiple cell discharges, which cause electro-magnetic far-field potentials", which can be tested via scalp electrodes. The potentials picked up by the electrodes are called Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEP) or auditory responses. There are different AEP-producing regions between the cochlea and the primary auditory cortex. However, the responses of the brainstem (ABRs) are particularly well suited for hearing tests in new-borns, infants and children. Reasons for this include: The responses are not influenced by state, and can thus be tested during sleep. This is the ideal state to test ABRs because it minimises influence of potentials from muscular activity, which could make a good measurement difficult. Many investigations have shown that the behavioural hearing threshold correlates strongly with the response threshold of the brainstem. In other words: If an ABR can be tested as a response to an acoustic stimulus, it is nearly certain that the individual can hear this stimulus. It would only be in rare cases of damage to the midbrain or auditory cortex that this would not hold true. Care must be taken during testing and evaluation in order to avoid false results. The amplitude of the electric response to a 30 or 40 db stimulus is frequently below 100 nv and therefore considerably lower than the scalp electroencephalogram (EEG) and electromyogram (EMG). 1.1.1 How AccuScreen determines a PASS in ABR testing The Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) is a low-amplitude signal usually buried in the electric brain and muscle activity (EEG and EMG). It can only be extracted by applying special filtering techniques. "Averaging" is the procedure most commonly used to make it visible: the stimulus is presented repeatedly - up to several thousand times - and the signal from the electrodes, which follow the stimulus, is summed con- Otometrics 5

Test Methods About Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) tinuously until the response can be detected. Visual detection and interpretation of such a signal requires a great deal of expertise. For screening purposes, the decision to pass or refer must be performed quickly and automatically. As a consequence, a different evaluation approach must be used for screening. A statistical approach determines the ABR PASS criterion. The procedure involves the application of a template and weighted averaging. Each recorded sweep of raw EEG data is first cross-correlated with the template that represents a typical newborn ABR response. The resulting sweep is then weighted with a factor according to its amplitude. Since raw data is dominated by EEG and EMG noise, the amplitude of a raw sweep can be considered as a noise measure. Sweeps with high amplitude are weighted low, and sweeps with low amplitude are weighted high. The resulting, averaged waveform is shown continuously, and statistical analysis is done periodically to issue a PASS or REFER result. The statistics involve calculating the amplitude of the waveform in the region that corresponds to the typical latency of a newborn ABR. This amplitude is then compared to an expected value for a noresponse recording. The region where the amplitude is analyzed is shown as a box in the waveform display. The waveform, because it has been processed with the template, does not feature a typical ABR pattern anymore. Instead, for a stable recording, it will show one major peak, that corresponds to the correlation function. Because the shape of the ABR response waveform changes with age, the detection algorithm is optimised accordingly by pre-filtering the recorded signals with a typical pattern for infants up to one year old. Although this does not preclude testing older children and adults with AccuScreen, the sub-optimal fit may result in longer test times for these patients. 1.1.2 How AccuScreen performs simultaneous binaural ABR tests Because the electrodes are placed on the forehead and nape, they record ABR signals regardless of which ear is being stimulated. However, the brain generates a huge amount of other signals at the same time, which act as noise in the ABR recording, because they are not synchronized with the acoustic stimulus. The same mechanism can be used for a simultaneous recording of ABR on both ears: If both ears are stimulated at different stimulus rates, the opposite ear's ABR response can be treated as an uncorrelated signal and will disappear during averaging. The AccuScreen uses a so-called jitter to randomize the stimulus rates when recording ABR anyway. For simultaneous recording, this randomization is done independ- 6 Otometrics

Test Methods About Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) ently for both ears, and ABR is recorded in synchronization with each stimulus sequence independently. The statistical evaluation for both ears is identical to the one that is used for testing only one ear, therefore the performance in sensitivity is equal. The overall gain in test time will, however, not be the ideal factor of two, because usually the two ears will need a different number of averages to pass due to statistical distribution. The simultaneous test has to wait for the "slower" ear, making the gain in test time somewhat lower, but still significant. Otometrics 7

Test Methods About Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) 8 Otometrics

Index A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z A ABR determining a PASS 5 method description 5 simultaneous binaural ABR tests 6 P PASS determining in ABR testing 5 S Simultaneous binaural ABR tests 6 T Test methods description 5 Otometrics 9

Index A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 10 Otometrics