MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola

Similar documents
Typical chest pain with normal ECG

Atypical pain and normal exercise test

Previous MI with no intervention

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: CORONARY CALCIUM SCORING

Current and Future Imaging Trends in Risk Stratification for CAD

Paradoxical pattern in a patient with previous myocardial infarction F. Mut, M. Kapitan

Hybrid Imaging Improving Nuclear Cardiology Practice

MEDICAL POLICY. 02/15/18 CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Guideline for Assessment of Cardiovascular Risk in Asymptomatic Adults. Learn and Live SM. ACCF/AHA Pocket Guideline

Preclinical Detection of CAD: Is it worth the effort? Michael H. Crawford, MD

ESC CONGRESS 2010 Stockholm, august 28 september 1, 2010

Financial Disclosures. Coronary Artery Calcification. Objectives. Coronary Artery Calcium 6/6/2018. Heart Disease Statistics At-a-Glace 2017

Testing the Asymptomatic CAD Patient: When and Why?

I have no financial disclosures

21st Annual Contemporary Therapeutic Issues in Cardiovascular Disease

MD F A F C A C MAS A N S C

Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Coronary Ca Score

Risk Stratification for CAD for the Primary Care Provider

Calcium scoring Clinical and prognostic value

Imaging ischemic heart disease: role of SPECT and PET. Focus on Patients with Known CAD

Coronary Artery Calcification

Coronary Artery Calcium. Vimal Ramjee, MD FACC The Chattanooga Heart Institute

Long-term outcome after normal myocardial perfusion imaging in suspected ischaemic heart disease

Stable Angina: Indication for revascularization and best medical therapy

Cardiac evaluation for the noncardiac. Nathaen Weitzel MD University of Colorado Denver Dept of Anesthesiology

The Coronary Artery Calcium Score and Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Provide Independent and Complementary Prediction of Cardiac Risk

Optimal testing for coronary artery disease in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Mater Dei Hospital, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. School of Medicine, Faculdade de Saúde e Ecologia Humana, Vespasiano, MG, Brasil

Computed Tomography to Detect Coronary Artery Calcification. Original Policy Date

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 50, No. 11, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /07/$32.

Medical Policy An Independent Licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association

Subclinical atherosclerosis in CVD: Risk stratification & management Raul Santos, MD

MOHAMMED R. ESSOP DIVISION OF CARDIOLOGY CH-BARAGWANATH HOSPITAL

Is computed tomography angiography really useful in. of coronary artery disease?

Stress only Perfusion Imaging

Screening for Asymptomatic Coronary Artery Disease: When, How, and Why?

Is Myocardial Perfusion Imaging an Important Predictor of Mortality in Women

Combining Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning with SPECT/PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Stress ECG is still Viable in Suleiman M Kharabsheh, MD, FACC Consultant Invasive Cardiologist KFHI KFSHRC-Riyadh

Cardiac CT Angiography

Imaging in the Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

David A. Orsinelli, MD, FACC, FASE Professor, Internal Medicine The Ohio State University Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Columbus, Ohio

Welcome! To submit questions during the presentation: or Text:

Exercise echocardiography is a routine test in patients

Evaluating Clinical Risk and Guiding management with SPECT Imaging

Pearls & Pitfalls in nuclear cardiology

Using Coronary Artery Calcium Score in the Quest for Cardiac Health. Robert J. Hage, D.O.

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

ΔΙΑΒΗΤΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΣΙΩΠΗΡΗ ΙΣΧΑΙΜΙΑ. Δρ. ΛΑΦΑΡΑΣ ΧΡΗΣΤΟΣ

Proper risk stratification is critical for the management of

Guideline Number: NIA_CG_024 Last Review Date: January 2011 Responsible Department: Last Revised Date: May 2, 2011 Clinical Operations

CT Coronary Angiography - Indications: From the guidelines to clinical practice

1. LV function and remodeling. 2. Contribution of myocardial ischemia due to CAD, and

Noninvasive cardiac imaging refers

Khurram Nasir, MD MPH

Normal Stress-Only Versus Standard Stress/Rest Myocardial Perfusion Imaging

Cardiac Risk Factors and Noninvasive Cardiac Diagnosis-ECG, ECHO, et al. Martin C. Burke, DO, FACOI ACOI IM Board Review Course 2018

Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease. Vinay Madan MD February 10, 2018

Hospital, 6 Lukon Road, Lukong Town, Changhua Shien, Taiwan 505, Taiwan.

Evaluation and Management of the Patient with Cardiac Disease for Non-Cardiac Surgery WINTER CONFRENCE 2016 RONY GORGES, MD

Patient-centered Imaging in Coronary Artery Disease. Jason H Cole, MD, MS, FACC January 10, 2015

Section: Radiology Last Reviewed Date: December Policy No: 6 Effective Date: February 1, 2014

Coronary Artery Calcium to Predict All-Cause Mortality in Elderly Men and Women

Prognostic Value of 99m Tc Sestamibi Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) in Ischemic Heart Disease

Diabetes and Occult Coronary Artery Disease

The Final 10-Year Follow-up Results from the Bari Randomized Trial J Am Coll Cardiol (2007) 49;1600-6

Chest Pain in Women ;What is Your Diagnostic Plan? No Need for Noninvasive Test

What the Cardiologist needs to know from Medical Images

Maria Angela S. Cruz-Anacleto, MD

Objective Calcium score carotid IMT hs-crp

Corporate Medical Policy

Higher coronary artery calcification score is associated with adverse prognosis in patients with stable angina pectoris

A CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW ON MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION WITH NORMAL CORONARY ARTERIES

Detection and Assessment of MI: Use of Imaging Methods. Robert O. Bonow, M.D.

Clinical Investigations

Be Still My Beating Heart!

Role of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in the Cardiac Evaluation of Aviators

New Paradigms in Predicting CVD Risk

Cardiology for the Practitioner Advanced Cardiac Imaging: Worth the pretty pictures?

Η Πυρηνική Καρδιολογία Το 2017 ΟΜΑΔΑ ΕΡΓΑΣΙΑΣ ΑΠΕΙΚΟΝΙΣΤΙΚΩΝ ΤΕΧΝΙΚΩΝ

Management of stable CAD FFR guided therapy: the new gold standard

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Value of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in Patients With Normal Resting Electrocardiograms

University Cardiology Clinic, Institute for Pathophysiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skopje, Macedonia 2

Potential recommendations for CT coronary angiography in athletes

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AEROMEDICAL UPDATE AND REVIEW FOR AVIATORS WITH KNOWN CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE

PET myocard perfusion & viability Riemer Slart

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Non Invasive Diagnostic Modalities for Coronary Artery Disease. Dr. Amitesh Aggarwal

F or many patients with chronic coronary artery disease,

Coronary heart disease

2/20/2013. Why use imaging in CV prevention? Update on coronary CTA in 2013 Coronary CTA for 1 0 prevention: pros and cons Are we there yet?

Clinical Appropriateness Guidelines: Diagnostic Coronary Angiography

The Value of Stress MRI in Evaluation of Myocardial Ischemia

Are We Ready for a Paradigm Shift From Risk Factors to Detection of Subclinical Coronary Atherosclerosis? Lessons From MESA. Khurram Nasir, MD MPH


The diagnostic role of stress echocardiography in women with coronary artery disease: evidence based review John R. McKeogh

Who Cares About the Past?

COMPARISON OF 2014 ACCAHA VS. ESC GUIDELINES EDITORIAL

Keywords Coronary artery calcium Coronary artery atherosclerosis Coronary risk assessment Coronary artery CT

Transcription:

MPS and Calcium Score in asymptomatic patient F. Mut, J. Vitola Nuclear Medicine Service, Asociacion Española Montevideo, Uruguay Quanta Diagnostico Nuclear Curitiba, Brazil

Clinical history Male 63 y.o., asymptomatic. Inactive but wants to start exercise. Knee osteoarthritis limiting exercise capacity. Hypertension (BP 145/90 mmhg under medication). Family history of CAD (father had sudden death at 53). Total Cholesterol = 223; HDL = 45; LDL = 128, Gluc = 0.97.

First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioct. d) Rest ECG.

First step to evaluate an asymptomatic patient? a) Global risk score (i.e. Framingham). b) SPECT-MPS. c) Coronary angioct. d) Rest ECG. Global risk score is a Class I indication in this setting; SPECT-MPS is Class IIB or III, Coronary angioct is Class III, and Rest ECG is Class IIA. Calculated Framingham risk score = 18% (intermediate risk for CAD events in 10 years) based on SBP, cholesterol levels, age, gender, and smoking status.

Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients? a) Calcium score (CAC). b) C-Reactive protein. c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound. d) All of the above.

Which test can help stratify intermediate CAD risk patients? a) Calcium score (CAC). b) C-Reactive protein. c) Carotid intima-media thickness on ultrasound. d) All of the above.

CAC 1611 Agatston (Percentile 97 for sex, age and race) High risk patient!

Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis? a) Treadmill test b) Myocardial perfusion study c) CT angiography d) Invasive angiography

Which test can help further stratify intermediate CAD risk patients with advanced atherosclerosis? a) Treadmill test b) Myocardial perfusion study c) CT angiography d) Invasive angiography In addition to the knowledge about atherosclerosis burden in our patient, short-term prognosis is dependent on the presence and degree of ischemia, the territory involved, and the LV function - all of which can be provided by MPS.

Myocardial perfusion study SPECT MPS, combined low workload exercise with dipyridamole, 99mTc-MIBI, one-day protocol. No symptoms or ST changes.

Myocardial perfusion study LVEF: stress 67%, rest 62%

The MPS result is consistent with: a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk. b) Normal perfusion. c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk. d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk.

The MPS result is consistent with: a) Anteroseptal infarction + ischemia, high risk. b) Normal perfusion. c) Inferoapical ischemia, low risk. d) Lateral wall ischemia, moderate risk. The images show inferoapical reversible defect, with preserved LV function both post-stress and rest = low risk for cardiac events.

Follow-up Patient was managed clinically for CAD, ischemic heart disease: Beta-blockers, ASA, statins. Secondary prevention (target = LDL< 70). Low level exercise: medicated and under supervision.

Teaching points CAC provides independent incremental information in addition to traditional risk factors in the prediction of allcause mortality. The principal difference between MPS and Ca scoring is that the former is an excellent tool for assessing shortterm risk, guiding decisions on revascularization. In contrast, atherosclerosis imaging methods like CAC provide greater long-term risk assessment, and are more useful in defining the need for aggressive medical prevention.

Bibliography Berman DS, Hachamovitch R, Shaw LJ, et al. Roles of nuclear cardiology, cardiac computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance: Noninvasive risk stratification and a conceptual framework for the selection of noninvasive imaging tests in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. J Nucl Med 2006; 47:1107 18. Budoff MJ, Shaw LJ, Liu ST. Long-term prognosis associated with coronary calcification: observations from a registry of 25,253 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 49:1860-70. Greenland P, Alpert JS, Beller GA, et al. 2010 ACCF/AHA guideline for assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 56:2182-99. Xu Y, Arsanjani R, Clond M, et al. Transient ischemic dilation for coronary artery disease in quantitative analysis of same-day sestamibi myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Cardiol 2012;19:465-73.