Confounding and Effect Modification

Similar documents
Acknowledgements. Section 1: The Science of Clinical Investigation. Scott Zeger. Marie Diener-West. ICTR Leadership / Team

Confounding and Effect Modification. John McGready Johns Hopkins University

Unit 8 Day 1 Correlation Coefficients.notebook January 02, 2018

Book review of Herbert I. Weisberg: Bias and Causation, Models and Judgment for Valid Comparisons Reviewed by Judea Pearl

3.4 What are some cautions in analyzing association?

10. Introduction to Multivariate Relationships

Section 1: The Science of Clinical Investigation

Lecture 9 Internal Validity

Biostatistics and Design of Experiments Prof. Mukesh Doble Department of Biotechnology Indian Institute of Technology, Madras

Confounding Bias: Stratification

Stratified Tables. Example: Effect of seat belt use on accident fatality

Lecture Outline. Biost 517 Applied Biostatistics I. Purpose of Descriptive Statistics. Purpose of Descriptive Statistics

Overview of Key Ozone Epidemiology Literature

4.2: Experiments. SAT Survey vs. SAT. Experiment. Confounding Variables. Section 4.2 Experiments. Observational Study vs.

Main objective of Epidemiology. Statistical Inference. Statistical Inference: Example. Statistical Inference: Example

How Bad Data Analyses Can Sabotage Discrimination Cases

Estimating indirect and direct effects of a Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) diagnosis on survival for a 6 month-period after diagnosis.

Lecture 4. Confounding

A teaching presentation to help general psychology students overcome the common misconception that correlation equals causation

Causal Inference in Statistics A primer, J. Pearl, M Glymur and N. Jewell

Epidemiologic Methods I & II Epidem 201AB Winter & Spring 2002

AMS 5 EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

HEAT GUIDELINES HEAT RELATED ILLNESS

BIOSTATISTICAL METHODS

What is Statistics? (*) Collection of data Experiments and Observational studies. (*) Summarizing data Descriptive statistics.

M 140 Test 1 A Name SHOW YOUR WORK FOR FULL CREDIT! Problem Max. Points Your Points Total 60

Simpson s Paradox and the implications for medical trials

Judea Pearl. Cognitive Systems Laboratory. Computer Science Department. University of California, Los Angeles, CA

Triggering of Ischemic Stroke Onset by Decreased Temperature: A case-crossover study

What is Data? Part 2: Patterns & Associations. INFO-1301, Quantitative Reasoning 1 University of Colorado Boulder

So You Want to do a Survey?

Geographic Data Science - Lecture IX

Understanding Confounding in Research Kantahyanee W. Murray and Anne Duggan. DOI: /pir

Math 140 Introductory Statistics

CURRICULUM VITAE Hong Zhu

Introduction. Lecture 1. What is Statistics?

STAT 201 Chapter 3. Association and Regression

PubH 7405: REGRESSION ANALYSIS. Propensity Score

STATS Relationships between variables: Correlation

Causation. Victor I. Piercey. October 28, 2009

Genetics, epigenetics, and Mendelian randomization: cuttingedge tools for causal inference in epidemiology

Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data

Estimating Direct Effects of New HIV Prevention Methods. Focus: the MIRA Trial

Designed Experiments have developed their own terminology. The individuals in an experiment are often called subjects.

Chapter 3. Producing Data

Summer AP Statistic. Chapter 4 : Sampling and Surveys: Read What s the difference between a population and a sample?

General Biostatistics Concepts

Choosing Research Designs II. Nonexperimental Methods

UNIT 5 - Association Causation, Effect Modification and Validity

STATISTICS INFORMED DECISIONS USING DATA

CHAPTER 4 Designing Studies

Preventing Heat Stress on the Golf Course

Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding: confounding functions for causal inference

Sampling. (James Madison University) January 9, / 13

Using directed acyclic graphs to guide analyses of neighbourhood health effects: an introduction

Study Methodology: Tricks and Traps

ONLINE MATERIAL THAT ACCOMPANIES CHAPTER 11. Box 1. Assessing additive interaction using ratio measures

CS 520 Theory and Practice of Software Engineering Fall 2017

Confounding. Confounding and effect modification. Example (after Rothman, 1998) Beer and Rectal Ca. Confounding (after Rothman, 1998)

Descriptive Methods: Correlation

Chapter 4. More On Bivariate Data. More on Bivariate Data: 4.1: Transforming Relationships 4.2: Cautions about Correlation

Chapter 4: More about Relationships between Two-Variables Review Sheet

Supplement 2. Use of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs)

STATE ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH INDICATORS COLLABORATIVE (SEHIC) CLIMATE AND HEALTH INDICATORS

Lesson Plan. Class Policies. Designed Experiments. Observational Studies. Weighted Averages

How Causal Heterogeneity Can Influence Statistical Significance in Clinical Trials

Chapter 3. Producing Data

Pre-Calculus Multiple Choice Questions - Chapter S4

Homework #3. SHORT ANSWER. Write the word or phrase that best completes each statement or answers the question.

NANO: Network Access Neutrality Observatory

Issues in Randomization

16:35 17:20 Alexander Luedtke (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center)

STATISTICS & PROBABILITY

From Description to Causation

Confounders and Corfield: Back to the Future 12 July, 2018

Chapter 4: Understanding Others

INTERNAL VALIDITY, BIAS AND CONFOUNDING

Examining Relationships Least-squares regression. Sections 2.3

Chapter 5: Producing Data

Methods to control for confounding - Introduction & Overview - Nicolle M Gatto 18 February 2015

Designing Pharmacy Practice Research

Delgado Safety Topic RECOGNITION AND PREVENTION OF HEAT RELATED ILLNESSES. Prepared by: Corey Valdary

A NEW TRIAL DESIGN FULLY INTEGRATING BIOMARKER INFORMATION FOR THE EVALUATION OF TREATMENT-EFFECT MECHANISMS IN PERSONALISED MEDICINE

Observational Substance Use Epidemiology: A case study

Penn State MPH Program Competencies 2013

Confounding and Interaction

Gathering. Useful Data. Chapter 3. Copyright 2004 Brooks/Cole, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc.

Appendix B. Fundamentals of Experimental Design I. BASIC CONCEPTS. THREATS TO INTERNAL VALIDITY (i.e. sources of experimental error)

Climate Change and our Children s Health

8/10/2012. Education level and diabetes risk: The EPIC-InterAct study AIM. Background. Case-cohort design. Int J Epidemiol 2012 (in press)

Two-Way Frequency Tables: Teaching a New Statistics Standard Conceptually

t-test for r Copyright 2000 Tom Malloy. All rights reserved

Leah A. Jacobs, M.S.W., Ph.D Cathedral of Learning Pittsburgh, PA Phone: (412)

CHAPTER OFFICER GUIDE

115 remained abstinent. 140 remained abstinent. Relapsed Remained abstinent Total

Bystander and Indoor Residential Pesticide Exposure

An Introduction to Statistical Thinking Dan Schafer Table of Contents

Mark Petersen & Jen Muscha. Livestock & Range Research Laboratory

lab exam lab exam Experimental Design Experimental Design when: Nov 27 - Dec 1 format: length = 1 hour each lab section divided in two

Transcription:

Confounding and Effect Modification Karen Bandeen-Roche, Ph.D. Hurley-Dorrier Chair and Professor of Biostatistics July 17, 2012 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 1 Outline 1. Causal inference: comparing otherwise similar populations 2. Confounding is confusing 3. Graphical representation of causation 4. Addressing confounding 5. Effect modification JHU Intro to Clinical Research 2 Counterfactual Data Table Person Drug Y(0) Y(1) Y(1)-Y(0) 1 0 22 16-6 2 0 18 17-1 3 0 20 15-5 4 1 20 18-2 5 1 18 16-2 6 1 22 14-8 Average 20 16-4 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 3 1

Actual Data Table Person Drug Y(0) Y(1) Y(1)-Y(0) 1 0 22?? 2 0 18?? 3 0 20?? 4 1? 18? 5 1? 16? 6 1? 14? Average 20 16-4 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 4 Goal of Statistical Causal Inference Fill-in missing information in the counterfactual data table Use data for persons receiving the other treatment to fill-in a persons missing outcome Inherent assumption that the other persons are similar except for the treatment: otherwise similar Compare like-to-like JHU Intro to Clinical Research 5 Confounding Confound means to confuse When the comparison is between groups that are otherwise not similar in ways that affect the outcome Simpson s paradox; lurking variables,. JHU Intro to Clinical Research 6 2

Confounding Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate JHU Intro to Clinical Research Ice Cream consumption 7 Confounding Epidemiology definition: A characteristic C is a confounder if it is associated (related) with both the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) and is not causally in between Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate?? JHU Intro to Clinical Research 8 Confounding Statistical definition: A characteristic C is a confounder if the strength of relationship between the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) differs with, versus without, adjustment for C Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Outdoor Temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research 9 3

Confounding Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Cool temperature Warm temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research Ice Cream consumption 10 Mediation A characteristic M is a mediator if it is causally in the pathway by which the risk factor (X: ice cream) leads the outcome (Y: drowning) Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Cramping JHU Intro to Clinical Research 11 Confounding Statistical definition: A characteristic C is a confounder if the strength of relationship between the outcome and the risk factor differs with, versus without, comparing like to like on C Thought example: Outcome = remaining lifespan Risk factor = # diseases Confounder = age JHU Intro to Clinical Research 12 4

Example: Graduate School Admissions UC Berkeley Number Percent Applied Male 1901 55 Female 1119 36 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 13 Number Males Applied Number Males Male % Female % Number Females Number Females Applied A 825 512 62 82 89 108 B 560 353 63 68 17 25 C 325 120 37 34 202 593 D 191 53 28 24 94 393 Total 1901 1038 55 36 402 1119 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 14 Percent Admitted Percent Male Applicants Percent Female Applicants A 65 43 10 B 63 30 2 C 35 17 53 D 25 10 35 Total 48 100 100 July 2010 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 15 5

JHU Intro to Clinical Research 16 What is the lurking variable causing admissions rates to be lower in departments to which more women apply? Gender Admission?? JHU Intro to Clinical Research 17 What is the lurking variable causing admissions rates to be lower in departments to which more women apply? Gender Admission Department to which applied JHU Intro to Clinical Research 18 6

Number Males Applied Number Males Male % Female Male % Female % Number Females Number Females Applied A 825 512 62 +20 82 89 108 B 560 353 63 +5 68 17 25 C 325 120 37-3 34 202 593 D 191 53 28-4 24 94 393 Total 1901 1038 55-19 36 402 1119 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 19 in admission rates between women and men: in admission rates between women and men: July 2010 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 20 Now for something entirely different Particulate air pollution and mortality JHU Intro to Clinical Research 21 7

Chicago Los Angeles July 2010 Correlation: Daily mortality and PM 10 New York -0.031 Chicago -0.036 Los Angeles -0.019 Is season confounding the correlation between PM 10 and mortality? What would happen if we removed season from the analysis? 8

Season-specific correlations All Year Winter Spring Summer Fall NY -0.031 0.059 0.059 0.086 0.100 Chicago -0.036-0.017 0.054 0.140-0.030 LA -0.019 0.157 0.063 0.042-0.118 Overall association for New York 9

10

Season-specific associations are positive, overall association is negative Overall correlations All Year Average over Seasons New York -0.031 0.076 Chicago -0.036 0.037 LA -0.019 0.036 Overall correlations All Year Unadjusted Average 4 within-season values Adjusted Average 12 within month values Adjusted New York -0.031 031 0.076076 0.079079 Chicago -0.036 0.037 0.063 LA -0.019 0.036 0.050 11

Effect modification A characteristic E is an effect modifier if the strength of relationship between the outcome (Y: drowning) and the risk factor (X: ice cream) differs within levels of E Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Outdoor temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research 34 Effect Modification Example: Drowning and Ice Cream Consumption Drowning rate Cool temperature Warm temperature JHU Intro to Clinical Research Ice Cream consumption 35 Question: Does aspirin use modify the association between treatment and adverse outcomes? 36 12

July 2008 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 37 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 38 JHU Intro to Clinical Research 39 13

Aspirin use modifies the effect of treatment on the risk of stroke? Losartan vs- Atenolol Stroke Aspirin Use JHU Intro to Clinical Research 40 Summary 1. Causal inference: comparing otherwise similar populations 2. Confounding means confusing: comparing otherwise groups 3. Stratify by confounders and make comparisons within strata, then pool results across strata to avoid the effects of confounding 4. Effect modification when the treatment effect varies by stratum of another variable JHU Intro to Clinical Research 41 14