Microaneurysms in the development of diabetic retinopathy (UKPDS 42)

Similar documents
UKPDS 50: Risk factors for incidence and progression of retinopathy in Type II diabetes over 6 years from diagnosis

CLINICAL SCIENCES. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, 30

Diabetes Care 24: , 2001

The epidemiology of type 2 diabetes

INTRODUCTION AND SYMPTOMS

Marcus Gonzales, OD, FAAO Cedar Springs Eye Clinic

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) was first PROCEEDINGS DIABETIC RETINOPATHY * Ronald Klein, MD, MPH ABSTRACT

RANZCO Screening and Referral Pathway for Diabetic Retinopathy #

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY

Diagnosis and treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Blake Cooper MD Ophthalmologist Vitreoretinal Surgeon Retina Associates Kansas City

Diabetic Management beyond traditional risk factors and LDL-C control: Can we improve macro and microvascular risks?

Influence of pregnancy on long-term progression of retinopathy in patients with type 1 diabetes

Hypertension in Diabetes Study IV. Therapeutic requirements to maintain tight blood pressure control

Clinical biomicroscopy versus fluorescein angiography: Effectiveness and sensitivity in detecting diabetic retinopathy

10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

Risk Factors for High-Risk Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy and Severe Visual Loss: Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report #18

Diabetic Retinopathy. Barry Emara MD FRCS(C) Giovanni Caboto Club October 3, 2012

Jay M. Haynie, O.D.; F.A.A.O. Olympia Tacoma Renton Kennewick Washington

Longitudinal study of a cohort of people with diabetes screened by the Exeter Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme

Diabetes, particularly diabetic retinopathy, is

Blood Pressure, Lipids, and Obesity Are Associated With Retinopathy

FRANZCO, MD, MBBS. Royal Darwin Hospital

Diabetic and the Eye: An Introduction

Diabetic Retinopatathy

EyePACS Grading System (Part 3): Detecting Proliferative (Neovascular) Diabetic Retinopathy. George Bresnick MD MPA Jorge Cuadros OD PhD

The retinal renin-angiotensin system: implications for therapy in diabetic retinopathy

In its initial report, the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy. A Severity Scale for Diabetic Macular Edema Developed from ETDRS Data

7.1 Grading Diabetic Retinopathy

Longitudinal Studies of Incidence and Progression of Diabetic Retinopathy Assessed by Retinal Photography in Pima Indians

Diabetologia 9 by Springer-Verlag 1978

PART 1: GENERAL RETINAL ANATOMY

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening in Hong Kong. Dr. Rita Gangwani M.S, FRCS (Ophth), FCOphth(HK), FHKAM Eye Institute, The University of Hong Kong

CLINICAL SCIENCES. Computer Classification of Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy. is characterized by structural

Abnormalities of the retinal veins are. loops and reduplications in diabetic retinopathy. Prevalence, distribution, and pattern of development

Use of eye care services by people with diabetes: the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project

Factors Associated with Visual Outcome after Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy

Long-Term Follow-up after Tight Control of Blood Pressure in Type 2 Diabetes

EyePACS Grading System (Part 2): Detecting Presence and Severity of Background (Non-Proliferative) Diabetic Retinopathy Lesion

Slide notes: The major chronic complications of diabetes mellitus are described here. Among these, microvascular complications have an important

Epidemiology and Pathophysiology of Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic Retinopathy

A screening approach in the primary care setting

ASSESSMENT OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED BLACK KENYAN TYPE 2 DIABETICS

DIABETIC RETINOPATHY, A

Proposed International Clinical Diabetic Retinopathy and Diabetic Macular Edema Disease Severity Scales

Eyes on Diabetics: How to Avoid Blindness in Diabetic Patient

Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) is

Control of Systemic Factors Can Preserve Vision in Diabetic Retinopathy

Grading Diabetic Retinopathy R2 - dots, blots and multiple headaches!

Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides

Abstract. Introduction. Original paper. Comparison of screening for diabetic retinopathy by non-specialists and specialists

Medical Retina 2011 Nicholas Lee

Diabetic Retinopathy A Presentation for the Public

A pilot Study of 25-Hydroxy Vitamin D in Egyptian Diabetic Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy

10/8/13. the diabetes epidemic: strategies for saving sight. financial disclo$ure. unlabeled-investigative use disclosure

Optic Disc Cupping: Four Year Follow-up from the WESDR

D iabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in

Retinopathy in a diabetic population

Nabetoiogia Springer-Verlag 1986

FREQUENCY OF DIABETIC RETINOPATHY IN A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL USING DIGITAL RETINAL IMAGING TECHNOLOGY

Zachary Sellers - 10-Year Follow-up of Intensive Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes

Sponsored by. Shared care and referral pathways. Part 2: diabetes screening leading from the front

Factors Influencing the Development of Visual Loss in Advanced Diabetic Retinopathy

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in diabetics of rural population belonging to Ramanagara and Chikkaballapura districts of Karnataka

CLINICAL SCIENCES. Results After Lens Extraction in Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 25

This is the author s accepted version, converted from Word format.

The prevalence of retinopathy in subjects with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus

In people with type 2 diabetes, there is a 2- to 5-fold

Diabetes and Eye Health more than meets the eye Vision Initiative - in association with PSA

Deposited on: 13 June 2008 Glasgow eprints Service

Progression of Diabetes Retinal Status Within Community Screening Programs and Potential Implications for Screening Intervals DOI: 10.

Diabetic Retinopathy

Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom prospective diabetes study (UKPDS: 23)

Study of 189 Cases of Diabetic Retinopathy at CMC Larkana

National Diabetes Retinal Screening Grading System and Referral Guidelines

Diabetic Retinopathy: Managing the Extremes. J. Michael Jumper, MD West Coast Retina

DR Screening In Singapore: Achievements & Future Challenges

Diabetic Learning Event: Diabetic Eye Screening and Retinopathy- Samantha Mann & Mark Frost

Diabetic Maculopathy in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy in Tertiary Eye Care Hospital in India: A Prospective Nonrandomized Clinical Study

Clinical Trials in Diabetic Retinopathy. Harry W. Flynn Jr., M.D. Nidhi Relhan Batra, M.D.

Clinically Significant Macular Edema (CSME)

Diabetic Eye Disease Visual Recognition & Interpretation of Clinical Signs

RISK FACTORS FOR DIABETIC RETINOPATHY PROGRESSION

The economic impact of diabetic macular oedema in Australia

Diabetic Retinopathy

Page # 1. Objectives. History of Clinical Trials. Developing New Therapies Clinical Studies and Trials. FDA Classification of Clinical Studies/Trials

Diabetic retinopathy in Victoria, Australia: the Visual Impairment Project

8/8/17. Objectives. Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (PDR) Examining the Diabetic Patient: What Matters Most

Front Line Diabetic Retinopathy What Not to Miss and Why

What is diabetes? Ocolusystemic Disease Essen6als. Statistics, cont. Statistics. Statistics. The Diabetes Epidemic 9/5/12

Diabetic Eye Disease

Outline. Preventing & Treating Diabetes Related Blindness. Eye Care Center Doctors. Justin Kanoff, MD. Eye Care Center of Northern Colorado

Type 1 diabetes patients with severe non-proliferative retinopathy may benefit from panretinal photocoagulation.

Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy for the Internist

Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study

New vessel formation in retinal branch vein occlusion

Optic Disc Cupping: Prevalence Findings from the WESDR

Diabesity A Public Health Crisis: AOA Evidence Based Translation to Care Series

D iabetic retinopathy (DR) is a common

Effect of Ruboxistaurin on Blood Retinal Barrier Permeability in Relation to Severity of Leakage in Diabetic Macular Edema

Transcription:

Diabetologia (1999) 42: 1107±1112 Ó Springer-Verlag 1999 Microaneurysms in the development of diabetic retinopathy (UKPDS 42) E.M. Kohner 1, I. M. Stratton 2, S. J. Aldington 3, R. C. Turner 2, D. R. Matthews 2 for the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group 1 Department of Medicine St. Thomas' Hospital, London, UK 2 Diabetes Research Laboratories, Radcliffe Infirmary, Woodstock Road, Oxford, UK 3 Retinopathy Grading Centre, Imperial College School of Medicine, London, UK Abstract Aims/hypothesis. To determine whether microaneurysms, in the absence of other lesions, have a predictive role in the progression of diabetic retinopathy in Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Methods. Retinal photographs taken at diagnosis in patients participating in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study, and thereafter at 3 yearly intervals, were assessed using a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy grading system for lesions of diabetic retinopathy and end points of vitreous haemorrhage and photocoagulation. The number of microaneurysms in each eye was recorded. Results. The changes between diagnosis and later photographs were analysed in 2424 patients at 6 years, 1236 at 9 years and 414 at 12 years. Of the 2424 patients studied in the 6 year 1809 had either no retinopathy or microaneurysms only at entry. In these patients the presence of microaneurysms alone and also the number of microaneurysms had a high predictive value for worsening retinopathy at 3, 6, 9, and 12 years after entry into the study (e.g. at 6 years c 2 for trend = 75 on 1 df, p < 0.001). The predictive value of the presence or absence of microaneurysms and their number at 3 years from diagnosis and subsequent worsening retinopathy was similar to that at entry. Conclusion/interpretation. Microaneurysms are important lesions of diabetic retinopathy and even one or two microaneurysms in an eye should not be regarded as unimportant. [Diabetologia (1999) 42: 1107±1112] Keywords Diabetic retinopathy, microaneurysms, UKPDS, Type II diabetes, diabetes, complications. Microaneurysms (MA) are the hallmark of diabetic retinopathy, and are the earliest clinically recognisable features of the condition. They have, however, been found in patients without diabetes [1] and this raises the question whether the presence of a few MAs, in the absence of any other retinal lesion, are of any importance in diabetic patients. This is further emphasised by the fact that although MAs are most Received: 10 November 1998 and in revised form: 26 February 1999 Corresponding author: E. M. Kohner, Department of Medicine, St. Thomas' Hospital, Lambeth Palace Rd., London SE1 7EH, UK Abbreviations: MA, Microaneurysms; UKPDS, United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study. commonly seen in the perifoveal area, they are only rarely the cause of visual impairment. To determine the importance of MAs and particularly whether they have a predictive value for the progression of diabetic retinopathy we examined the photographs of patients in the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), a large multicentre randomised controlled clinical study of different treatments in newly diagnosed Type II diabetic patients. This paper presents the result of that study. Subjects and methods Details of the UKPDS, patient recruitment and randomisation have been reported [2]. In brief, patients in whom Type II (non-insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus had been newly di-

1108 Table 1. Summarised `Modified ETDRS Final' retinopathy levels Level Severity Definition 10 DR absent All DR features absent 20 MA only Microaneurysm(s) only, other features absent 35 Mild NPDR MA, + retinal haemorrhage(s) and/or hard exudates, and/or cotton wool spots 43 Moderate NPDR Lesions as above + either extensive or severe HMA or IRMA present 47 Moderately severe NPDR Lesions of 35 with either extensive and severe HMA with IRMA or venous beading 53 Severe NPDR Very severe HMA, IRMA VB 61, 65, 71, 75 PDR NVD and/or NVE without or with complications 81 Advanced PDR Retina obscured by VH or PRH 99 Cannot grade Abbreviations: DR = diabetic retinopathy, NPDR = Non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, PDR = Proliferative diabetic retinopathy, MA= Microaneurysm, HMA= haemorrhages and microaneurysms, IRMA = intra retinal microvascular abnormalities, NVD = new vessels on the disc, NVE = new vessels elswhere, VH = vitreous haemorrhage, PRH = pre-retinal haemorrhage, VB = Venous beading agnosed were treated for 3 months with diet only. If after that time they were still hyperglycaemic, but symptom free, they were randomly allocated to remain on diet only or be treated with an oral hypoglycaemic agent or insulin [3]. Patients were seen at 3 monthly intervals in the diabetic clinic, and had a full medical examination at entry and yearly thereafter, including visual acuity determination and retinal examination by ophthalmoscopy. At 3 yearly intervals retinal photographs were taken of four standard stereo-pairs of each eye and assessed as described previously [4]. Assessment of retinal photographs. Retinal photographs were masked for all patient identifying details and assigned with a unique identification number. Photographs were centrally assessed by two independent experienced readers for quality and adherence to the photographic protocol as well as the presence of any diabetic retinal lesions. When such lesions were present, the photographs received a detailed assessment involving the classification of the retinal lesions against Airlie House standard photographs [5] again carried out in duplicate. E. M. Kohner et al.: Microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy A computer algorithm then assigned a retinopathy level for each eye according to a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy grading system [6]. A simplified summary is seen in Table 1. During the detailed assessment stage, graders carried out a manual count of the total number of MAs present in each eye. The number of MAs was recorded for each eye as absent (0); present, numbering 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 in the eye; present, numbering 6±10 in the eye; or present in numbers greater than 10. As there was overlap between the four fields, this was taken into account during the counting exercise. Independent adjudication of differences was applied throughout all stages of assessment. Statistical analysis. Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared statistics were used for determining the trend in retinopathy severity relating to the number of MAs present at entry and to that at subsequent 3-year intervals. All data were analysed using SAS (SAS Institute, Carey, N. C., USA). Results There were 5102 patients who entered the UKPDS. Of these 3569 had retinal photographs at entry. There were 2424 subjects who had photographs both at entry (baseline) and 6 years; 1809 of these had either no retinopathy or MAs only at entry. A of 1236 of these were also studied at baseline and 9 years and 414 at baseline and 12 years. There was no statistically significant relation between the number of MAs at entry and the clinical and biochemical variables measured, including sex, race, smoking, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, HbA 1c, fasting plasma insulin, insulin sensitivity, beta-cell function, HDL or LDL cholesterol or triglyceride [2]. Disappearance rate of microaneurysms. Table 2 shows the disappearance rate of MAs at 6, 9 and 12 years. This indicates that MAs were most likely to disappear if there was only one present, when about 50% disappeared at each time interval. In contrast only a third of subjects was there a total disappearance when there were two or three present at entry, and less than one in six when there were five or more present. Table 3 shows the relation between those in whom MAs disappeared by 3 years and those who had no Table 2. Disappearance rate of microaneurysms Number of microaneurysms at entry 3-year 6-year 9-year 12-year 1 160/315 50.8% 121/255 47.5% 86/180 47.8% 30/68 44.1% 2 57/153 37.2% 42/127 33.1% 27/77 35.1% 7/21 33.3% 3 24/73 32.9% 20/65 30.8% 12/48 25.0% 4/13 30.8% 4 11/30 36.7% 8/23 34.8% 4/15 26.7% 1/2 50.0% 5 10/44 22.7% 6/36 16.7% 3/25 12.0% 0/7 0%

E. M. Kohner et al.: Microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy 1109 Table 3. Retinopathy level at 6 years in those without MAs at 3 years No. of microaneurysms at entry no retinopathy 0 600 67.0 1 69 56.1 2 24 55.8 3 11 64.7 4 5 55.5 5 or more 5 62.5 MA only 196 21.9 38 30.9 11 25.6 5 29.4 3 33.3 1 12.5 More severe 100 11.1 16 13.0 8 18.6 1 5.9 1 11.1 2 25.0 Mantel Haenszel chi-squared for trend 0.936, p = 0.333 Numbers in italics indicate percentage Total 896 123 43 17 9 8 Fig. 2. Retinopathy at 6 years by number of microaneurysms at entry. Annotation as in Fig. 1 Fig. 1. Retinopathy at 3 years by number of microaneurysms at entry. Number above columns shows total number of eyes in that group. Vertical axis shows per cent of eyes in each category indicated in to the right of the columns. Clear part of column with asterisk shows per cent of eyes in which the microaneurysms have disappeared. *± MA disappeared; A no retinopathy; MA only; 35 < 35 and 35/35; 43 < 43 and worse; R photocoagulation or vitreous haemorrhage MAs at entry and the 6 year retinopathy level. This shows that there is no difference in retinopathy severity at 6 years between those with and those without MAs at 3 years. Formation of microaneurysms. This study does not allow for determination of the formation rate of new MAs, because only the total number of MAs was counted. The patients, however, who developed, MAs only when they had no retinopathy at a previous visit was approximately 20 % at each 3 year interval; 19.7% between entry and 3 years; 24.7% between Fig. 3. Retinopathy at 9 years by number of microaneurysms at entry. Annotation as in Fig. 1 3 year and 6 years, whereas between 6 and 9 years 20.9% developed MA for the first time. Table 4 summarises data on risk of retinopathy for patients without MAs at entry who had photos at 3, 6 and 9 years. Progression of retinopathy. The progression of retinopathy is shown in Figs. 1±4. These show a pronounced almost linear increase of more severe forms of retinopathy with increasing number of MAs at entry and a concomitant decrease of those without retinopathy. The trend for this was highly statistically significant; at 6 years chi squared was 75, 1 df, p < 0.0000001, at 9 years chi squared was 61, 1 df, p < 0.0001 and at 12 years chi squared was 4.8, 1 df, p = 0.029. To determine whether it was the duration of diabetes or the number of MAs which was indicative of retinopathy progression patients who had no retinop-

1110 E. M. Kohner et al.: Microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy Table 4. Cohort of 508 subjects with no MA at entry with photographs at each of 3, 6 and 9 years Entry 3 years 6 years 9 years No MA 167 (32.9) 235 (46.3) MA only 49 (9.6) No MA L 35 19 (3.7) No MA 51 (10.0) No MA 356 (70.1) MA only 88 (17.3) MA only 24 (4.7) L 35 13 (2.6) No MA 7 (1.4) L 35 33 (6.5) MA only 6 (1.2) L 35 20 (3.9) No MA 28 (5.5) No MA 46 (9.1) MA only 13 (2.6) L 35 5 (1.0) No MA 18 (3.5) 508 MA only 100 (19.7) MA only 37 (7.3) MA only 11 (2.2) No MA L 35 8 (1.6) No MA 3 (0.6) L 35 17 (3.3) MA only 2 (0.4) L 35 12 (2.4) No MA 5 (1.0) No MA 9 (1.8) MA only 1 (0.2) L 35 3 (0.6) No MA 1 (0.2) L 35 52 (10.2) MA only 8 (1.6) MA only 2 (0.4) L 35 5 (1.0) No MA 4 (0.8) L 35 35 (6.9) MA only 2 (0.4) L 35 29 (5.7) athy or MAs only at 3 years had their progression evaluated at 9 years (i. e. 6 years later, to make it comparable to the study between entry and 6 years). There was a similar almost linear increase in the development of more severe retinopathy with an increasing number of MAs, the trend using chi squared being 52,1 df, p < 0.0000001 (Fig.5). Indeed there is no statistically significant difference between Fig. 2 and 5. Discussion This study shows that MAs are important predictive lesions for progression of diabetic retinopathy. There was an almost linear increase of severity of retinopathy and attainment of the end points of vitreous haemorrhage or photocoagulation with increasing number of the aneurysms and increasing duration of follow up. It might be expected that with longer duration of diabetes more severe lesions would be noted but comparing the progression between entry and 6 years with that of 3 to 9 years, the increase in retinopathy is very similar. The number of patients devel-

E. M. Kohner et al.: Microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy 1111 Fig. 4. Retinopathy at 12 years by number of microaneurysms at entry. Annotation as in Fig. 1 Fig. 5. Retinopathy at 9 years by number of microaneurysms at 3 years. Annotation as in Fig. 1 oping MAs for the first time was also similar at the 3 year intervals. In this predictive value of the number of MAs for worsening retinopathy our findings are not dissimilar from the Wisconsin study [7, 8]. At the 4 year examination in Wisconsin it was noted that those with 4 or more aneurysms had a statistically significantly increased trend to develop level 41 of the Wisconsin grading system [5] a level which indicated propensity to develop sight threatening retinopathy. Patients who increased their MA number and in whom the ratio of 4 year to entry MA number was highest were most likely to develop proliferative retinopathy and clinically significant macular oedema at 10 years. This was most pronounced in those who increased their MA number by 16 or more by 4 years. (The present study truncated counting before this number). In our study at 6 years of patients with 2±4 MAs over 27 % developed more severe non-proliferative retinopathy, (level 35 < 35 or 35/35) and up to 4.6% reached the end point of vitreous haemorrhage or photocoagulation. In those with 5 or more MAs, nearly 53% progressed to retinopathy, 2.8% reached moderate to severe non-proliferative retinopathy (level 43 < 43 and worse) and 5.6 % had photocoagulation or vitreous haemorrhage. Similarly, of the 22 patients who had 5 or more MAs at 3 years 11 or 50% deteriorated to level 35 < 35 or 35/35 and 2 (9.1 %) reached level 43 in at least 1 eye. Much larger numbers of MAs were counted in the Wisconsin study, [7, 8] but they used 7 standard field stereo pair photographs and counted all MAs found and in our study the counting was less detailed. Also all of the patients in that study were among the younger patients with onset of Type I (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus and many had diabetes for many years before entering the study. The large number of patients who had MAs at entering the study could be explained by the possibility that these patients had undiagnosed diabetes for some years before diagnosis. In a study which combined Wisconsin and Australian population-based studies [7] it was estimated that patients who have retinopathy at the time of diabetes diagnosis had the disease for between 4 and 7 years. The finding that about 20% of those without retinopathy at diagnosis in this study developed at least MAs by 6 years suggest that these patients were more similar to the Wisconsin than the Australian patients. The steady 20% developing MAs if they had no retinopathy 3 years previously could support the finding that the formation rate of MAs is independent of blood glucose control and other medical variables [7] and these factors only affect the more severe forms of retinopathy. That patients with a greater number of MAs had a more rapid advance to more severe forms of retinopathy also suggests that these patients may have had a longer duration of undiagnosed diabetes [9]. To be noted from this study is that MAs are important lesions which predict the progression of retinopathy. The presence of even one or two MAs only should alert doctors of the importance of careful follow-up of these patients. Screening techniques which miss MAs, such as Polaroid and some digital photographs should be ideally repeated at yearly intervals if possibly sight threatening lesions are to be recognised early. Acknowledgements. The study was conducted at the following centres in the United Kingdom: Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen; City Hospital, Belfast; Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast; General Hospital, Birmingham; St. Helier Hospital, Carshalton; Derbyshire Royal Hospital, Derby; Ninewells Hospital, Dundee; Royal Devon and Exeter Hospital, Exeter; Ipswich Hospital, Ipswich; Leicester General Hospital, Leicester; St. George's Hospital, London; Hammersmith Hospital, London; Whittington Hospital, London; Royal Infirmary, Manchester; Norfolk and Norwich Hospital, Norwich; Northampton Gen-

1112 eral Hospital, Northampton; Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford; Peterborough Hospital, Peterborough; Hope Hospital, Salford; Lister Hospital, Stevenage; North Staffordshire Royal Infirmary, Stoke-on-Trent; Torbay Hospital, Torbay. The co-operation of the patients and many National Health Service and Non-National Health Service staff at all the centres is much appreciated. Funding was provided by: National Eye Institute 2 UO1 EY07049±09, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; British Diabetic Association; Medical Research Council; National Institutes of Digestive Disorders and Kidney Disease NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA; UK Department of Health; British Heart Foundation and from pharmaceutical companies including: Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Hoechst, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Lipha and Farmitalia Carlo Erba and from additional companies including Securicor, Kodak and Cortecs Diagnostics. References 1. Hiller R, Sperduto R, Podgor M, Ferris 3rd F, Wilson PW (1988) Diabetic retinopathy and cardiovascular disease in type II diabetics. The Framingham Heart Study and Framingham Eye Study. Am J Epidemiol 128: 402±409 2. UKPDS Group (1991) UK Prospective Diabetes Study VIII: study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 34: 877±890 E. M. Kohner et al.: Microaneurysms in diabetic retinopathy 3. UKPDS Group (1995) UK Prospective Diabetes Study 13: Relative efficacy of randomly allocated diet, sulphonylurea, insulin, or metformin in patients with newly diagnosed non-insulin dependent diabetes followed for three years. BMJ 310: 83±88 4. UKPDS Group (1997) UK Prospective Diabetes Study 30: diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of type 2 diabetes and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 116: 297±303 5. Klein B, David M, Segal P (1998) Diabetic Retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin depenedent diabetes and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 116: 297±303 6. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group (1991) Grading diabetic retinopathy from steriopscopic color fundus photographs ± an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS Report No 10. Ophthalmology 98: 768±806 7. Klein R, Meuer S, Moss S, Klein B (1995) Retinal microaneurysm counts and 10 year progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 113: 1386±1392 8. Klein R, Meuer S, Moss S, Klein B (1989) The relationship of retinal microaneurysm counts to the 4 year progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 107: 1780±1785 9. Harris M, Klein R, Welborn T, Knuiman M (1992) Onset of NIDDM occurs at least 4±7 years before clinical diabetes. Diabetes Care 15: 815±819