JEADV SHORT REPORT. Abstract

Similar documents
Himmelfarb Health Sciences Library, The George Washington University. Dermatology Faculty Publications

First Real-World Insights on Apremilast Therapy for Patients With Plaque Psoriasis From the LAPIS-PSO Study: An Interim Analysis

Efficacy and Safety of Apremilast in Patients With Moderate Plaque Psoriasis (UNVEIL Phase IV Study)

DLQI (ESTEEM

75th AAD Annual Meeting

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusion:

University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; 2

BJD British Journal of Dermatology. Summary CLINICAL TRIALS

Selective Phosphodiesterase Inhibitors for Psoriasis: Focus on Apremilast

Kenneth Gordon, 1 Kim A. Papp, 2 Kara Creamer Rice, 3 Mona Trivedi, 3 David H. Collier, 3 Greg Kricorian 3

JEADV SHORT REPORT. Abstract

Kim A. Papp, MD PhD Probity Medical Research, Waterloo, ON, Canada

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Ning Guo 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

(Poster presented on Sunday 05 March, 08:50 08:55; 2017 AAD Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA)

Continuous dosing versus interrupted therapy with ixekizumab: an integrated analysis of two phase 3 trials in psoriasis

Poster presented on Sunday 05 March, 14:50 14:55; 2017 AAD Meeting, Orlando, Florida, USA

Atopic Dermatitis: Emerging therapies. Melinda Gooderham MSc MD FRCPC

Evaluating Psoriasis: Patient Reported Outcomes and Impact of Disease

Cigna Drug and Biologic Coverage Policy

Bruce Strober 1, 2, Chitra Karki 3, Marc Mason 3, Jeffrey D Greenberg 3,4, Mark Lebwohl 5

Association between disease severity and body mass index in psoriasis patients enrolled in the Corrona Psoriasis Registry

Summer AAD Summer AAD Support provided by LEO Pharma A/S. Poster nº

Calcipotriol Plus Betamethasone Dipropionate Aerosol Foam in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Sub-Group Analysis of the PSO-ABLE Study

JEADV ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract

The 73rd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology, San Francisco ; March 20-24, 2015 Poster ID: 909

Effect of Apremilast on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the ESTEEM 1 Trial

Jashin J Wu, 1 Alexander Egeberg, 2 James A Solomon, 3,4,5 Olawale Osuntokun, 6 Orin Goldblum, 6 Susan R Moriarty, 6 Fangyi Zhao, 6 Neil Korman 7

JEADV SHORT REPORT. Abstract

Bilaga 1.till rapport. Bilaga 1 Tabell över inkluderade studier/ Appendix 1 Description of included studies

Research Developments in Psoriasis Treatment A CME Activity

JEADV ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Abstract

P4081 Secukinumab skin clearance is associated with greater improvements in patient-reported pain, itching, and scaling

Emerging Insights in the Treatment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

OTEZLA (Apremilast) Showed Meaningful Improvements in Clinical and Quality of Life Measures of Psoriasis Beyond Those Captured by Assessing Skin Alone

1 Introduction. Kim A. Papp 1 April W. Armstrong. Wendell Valdecantos 4

Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/14/1263. Page:

What s New in the Treatment of Psoriasis

Charité - University Hospital, Free University and Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany; 2 Sanofi Genzyme, Bridgewater, NJ, USA; 3

IL-23 Inhibition in Psoriasis: Changing the Present, Shaping the Future

Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Inc., USA; Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India. Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA;

The Cosentyx clinical trial programme 1-11

Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/16/0603

Presented by: Adelaide A Hebert, MD UTHealth McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX

Accepted Manuscript. Reference: YMJD To appear in: Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

REVEALING A CLEAR PATH TOWARDS A NEW ERA IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PSORIASIS

Body Region Involvement and Quality of Life in Psoriasis: Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial of Adalimumab

Eli Lilly and Company

Cost per Responder of Apremilast Versus Etanercept, Adalimumab, and Ustekinumab in Patients With Moderate to Severe Psoriasis

Economic Evaluation of Apremilast in the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis in the United States

The role of current biologic therapies in psoriasis

XP23829 PHASE 2 PSORIASIS TRIAL PRELIMINARY TOPLINE DATA PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 COPYRIGHT 2015 XENOPORT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

BJD. Summary. British Journal of Dermatology THERAPEUTICS

Insights from the Kaiser Permanente database

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 25 November 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta368

Ustekinumab (Stelara) for psoriatic arthritis second line after disease modifying anti rheumatic drugs (DMARDs)

Psoriasis Disease Severity Affects Patient Satisfaction With Therapy

Details of UNCOVER-2 and UNCOVER-3 Study Results Published in The Lancet

Efficacy of Tofacitinib for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis: Pooled Analysis of Two Phase 3 Studies

Apremilast: A Novel Oral Treatment for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis

MOR106, an anti-il-17c mab, a potential new approach for treatment of moderate-tosevere atopic dermatitis: Phase 1 study

Update on systemic therapies and emerging treatments How do I choose a systemic agent?

Patients Perspective on the Impact of Moderate-to-Severe Genital Psoriasis

The New and Emerging Agents: Dermatology

Secukinumab is superior to ustekinumab in clearing skin of subjects with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: CLEAR, a randomized controlled trial

Biologics in Psoriasis. Peter CM van de Kerkhof Department of Dermatology Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre

BJD British Journal of Dermatology. Summary CLINICAL TRIALS

Efficacy and safety of adalimumab in patients with plaque psoriasis who have shown an unsatisfactory response to etanercept

Horizon Scanning Centre January Apremilast for psoriasis SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 2652

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Horizon Scanning Centre January Apremilast for psoriatic arthritis SUMMARY NIHR HSC ID: 3716

Gaps in the Treatment of Psoriasis and PsA for Systemic Therapy

ixekizumab 80mg solution for injection (Taltz ) SMC No. (1223/17) Eli Lilly and Company Ltd.

The Changing Landscape of Psoriasis: New Horizons for Oral Therapies

Incorporating Biologics Into Your Practice

Source: American Academy of Dermatology Annual Meeting held February 16 20, 2018, in San Diego, California

Is Apremilast (Otezla) Effective in Reducing Pruritus in Adults over 18 Years Old with Plaque Psoriasis?

PGA x BSA as a PASI Surrogate

Mark G. Lebwohl 1 Arthur Kavanaugh

X. Baraliakos 1, A.J. Kivitz 2, A.A. Deodhar 3, J. Braun 1, J.C. Wei 4, E.M. Delicha 5, Z. Talloczy 6, B. Porter 6, for the MEASURE 1 study group

Initiation and evaluation of the effect of biologic treatment. ActaDV ActaDV

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 17 Jan 2013

Background: Guselkumab, an interleukin-23 blocker, was superior to adalimumab in treating moderate to severe psoriasis in a phase II trial.

Industry Relationships and Institutional Affiliations

Synopsis (C0743T10) CNTO 1275 Module 5.3 C0743T10. Associated with Module 5.3 of the Dossier

SM04690: Potential first-in-class disease modifying treatment for knee osteoarthritis. Nancy Lane, MD

Psoriatic Arthritis: New and Emergent Therapies

Synopsis (C0743T09 PHOENIX 2)

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Effect of alirocumab on the frequency of lipoprotein apheresis: A randomised Phase III trial

Dimethyl Fumarate in Psoriasis Therapy

Background AN UPDATED LOOK AT TREATMENTS FOR PLAQUE PSORIASIS JULY 2018 PLAQUE PSORIASIS TARGETED IMMUNOMODULATORS AS A TREATMENT OPTION

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. doi: /bjd.

Secukinumab is Efficacious and Safe in Hispanic Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: Pooled Analysis of Four Phase 3 Trials

Psoriasis. Dr. Pablo de la Cueva Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor Madrid

2.0 Synopsis. Adalimumab R&D/04/118. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Biologics in Psoriasis: 2018 and Beyond. Jeffrey M. Sobell MD Tufts University School of Medicine SkinCare Physicians Ora Clinical Research

The Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI): Validation of an Instrument to Assess Psoriatic Nail Involvement

Anti-TNF biologic agents Dr Lluís Puig

24-Week CNTO1275PSA3001 Clinical Study Report

Transcription:

DOI: 1.1111/jdv.14738 JEADV SHORT REPORT Safety and efficacy of through 14 weeks in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis who continued on or switched from etanercept treatment: findings from the LIBERATE study K. Reich, 1, * M. Gooderham, 2 A. Bewley, 3,4 L. Green, 5 J. Soung, 6 R. Petric, 7 J. Marcsisin, 7 J. Cirulli, 7 R. Chen, 7,, V. Piguet 8,9,1 1 Dermatologikum Hamburg and SCIderm Research Institute, Hamburg, Germany 2 SKiN Centre for Dermatology, Queen s University and Probity Medical Research, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada 3 Whipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK 4 The Royal London Hospital, London, UK 5 George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA 6 Southern California Dermatology, Santa Ana, CA, USA 7 Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA 8 Cardiff University and University Hospital of Wales, Wales, UK 9 Division of Dermatology, Women s College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 1 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada *Correspondence: K. Reich. E-mail: kreich@dermatologikum.de Abstract Background, an oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. Objective To evaluate long-term efficacy and safety of in biologic-naive patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and safety of switching from etanercept to in the phase 3b LIBERATE trial. Methods Two hundred fifty patients were randomized to placebo, 3 mg BID or etanercept mg QW through Week 16; thereafter, all patients continued or switched to through Week 14 (extension phase). Skin, scalp and nail involvement at Weeks 16, 52 and 14 were assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI; 72), Scalp Physician Global Assessment (ScPGA; 5) and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI; 8); patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI; 32) and pruritus visual analog scale (VAS; 1 mm). Results The -extension phase (Weeks 16 14) included 226 patients in the placebo/ (n = 73), / (n = 74) and etanercept/ (n = 79) groups, and at Week 14,.7%, 45.9% and 51.9% of these patients, respectively, maintained 75% reduction from baseline in PASI score (based on last-observation-carried-forward analysis). Across treatment groups, ScPGA (clear) or 1 (minimal) was achieved by.% 59.2% of patients; NAPSI mean change from baseline was 48.1% to 51.1%; DLQI score 5 was achieved by 66.% 72.5% of patients; and pruritus VAS mean change from baseline was 24.4 to 32.3. AEs in 5% of patients (diarrhoea, nausea, nasopharyngitis, upper respiratory tract infection and headache) did not increase with prolonged exposure. Conclusions demonstrated significant and sustained improvements in skin, scalp, nails and PROs (pruritus and quality of life) over 14 weeks in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of. Received: 8 September 217; Accepted: 22 November 217 Conflicts of interest K. Reich has received honoraria as a consultant and/or advisory board member and/or acted as a paid speaker and/or participated in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene Corporation, Centocor, Covagen, Eli Lilly, Forward Pharma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, LEO Pharma, Medac, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis, Ocean Pharma, Pfizer, Regeneron, Takeda, UCB Pharma and XenoPort. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

398 Reich et al. M. Gooderham has received honoraria, grants and/or research funding as a speaker, investigator, advisory board member, data safety monitoring board member and/or consultant for AbbVie, Actelion, Amgen, Astellas Pharma US, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene Corporation, Dermira, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Janssen, Kyowa Hakko Kirin Pharma, LEO Pharma, MedImmune, Merck & Co., Inc., Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche Laboratories, Sanofi- Genzyme, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA Inc, UCB and Valeant. A. Bewley has had ad hoc consultancy agreements with AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Galderma, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, LEO Pharma, Novartis and Stiefel (a GSK company). L. Green has been a speaker, advisory board member and/or investigator for Amgen, AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, LEO Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer and Valeant. J. Soung has received honoraria and/or grants as a speaker, advisory board member and/or investigator for AbbVie, Actelion, Allergan, Amgen, Cassiopeia, Celgene Corporation, Cutanea, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Genentech, GenZum, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Kadmon, LEO Pharma, Merz, Pfizer, Regeneron and/or Valeant. R. Petric, J. Marcsisin and J. Cirulli are employed by Celgene Corporation. R. Chen was employed by Celgene Corporation at the time of study conduct. V. Piguet has been a principal investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Celgene Corporation and has received honoraria and/or grants as a speaker, advisory board member and/or investigator for AbbVie, Celgene Corporation, Almirall, Galderma, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen and Novartis. Funding sources The authors acknowledge financial support for this study from Celgene Corporation. The authors received editorial support in the preparation of this manuscript from Amy Shaberman, PhD, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, Parsippany, NJ, USA, funded by Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ, USA. The authors, however, directed and are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions for this manuscript. All authors had full access to all of the data, and data are available upon request. Introduction LIBERATE (NCT169299), a global phase 3b study in biologicnaive patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, demonstrated that significantly more patients receiving for 16 weeks achieved PASI-75 ( 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]) vs. placebo. 1 A post hoc analysis found no significant difference in response rates among patients given vs. etanercept, an anti-tumour necrosis factor-a biologic agent. 1 This report describes efficacy and safety outcomes from the LIBERATE -extension phase (Weeks 16 14) in patients who continued treatment through 14 weeks, including those who switched from etanercept or placebo. Materials and methods Patients and study design Patient selection, study design and study methods have been described in detail. 1 Briefly, patients in the LIBERATE trial were adults in the United States, Canada, Europe (Belgium, Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Great Britain, Hungary, Latvia, the Netherlands) or Australia with chronic, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis with inadequate response, inability to tolerate or Employed by Celgene Corporation at the time of study conduct. contraindication to treatment with 1 conventional systemic agent, and who were biologic-naive. Eligible patients were randomized (1 : 1 : 1) to double-blind treatment with 3 mg twice daily, etanercept subcutaneous injection mg once weekly, or placebo for 16 weeks. At Week 16, placebo and etanercept patients were switched to (placebo, without titration; etanercept, with 1-week titration); patients continued treatment through Week 14. Efficacy and safety assessments The primary efficacy end point, the proportion of patients who achieved PASI-75 at Week 16, was previously reported. 1 Efficacy of continued treatment was evaluated at scheduled visits over 14 weeks based on (i) skin symptoms, as assessed using PASI improvement from baseline, achievement of PASI-75 response and achievement of response on the 5-point static Physician Global Assessment (spga; response = score of [clear] or 1 [almost clear]); (ii) change from baseline in pruritus, as assessed using a 1-mm visual analog scale (VAS; = no pruritus, 1 = worst possible pruritus); (iii) scalp symptoms, as assessed based on achievement of response on the 6-point Scalp Physician Global Assessment (ScPGA; response = score of [clear] or 1 [minimal]); (iv) nail symptoms, as assessed based on improvement from baseline in Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) score in the target nail and achievement of NAPSI-

Efficacy and safety over 14 weeks of treatment 399 ( % reduction from baseline in NAPSI score) among patients with nail symptoms (i.e. NAPSI score 1); and (v) impact of psoriasis on quality of life (QOL), as assessed by improvement from baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) total score, achievement of DLQI total score 5 (minimal impairment) and achievement of DLQI total score of or 1. Safety was assessed based on adverse events (AEs), vital signs, clinical laboratory assessments and physical examinations. Statistical analysis Efficacy analyses were performed in the modified intent-to-treat population (all randomized patients who received 1 dose of study medication and had baseline PASI and 1 post-treatment PASI assessments). Statistical analyses for between-group comparisons of efficacy assessments at Week 16 included Cochran Mantel Haenszel tests for categorical variables and an analysis of covariance model for continuous variables. Efficacy assessments during the -extension phase were summarized using descriptive statistics at visits after treatment initiation. Missing values were imputed using last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) methodology. Responder analyses of DLQI total score 5 and DLQI score of or 1 were performed using data from completers without imputation. Safety was summarized using descriptive statistics. 1 Results Patients There were 233 patients who completed the placebo-controlled phase among 2 randomized patients. There were 226 patients who entered the -extension phase (placebo/, n = 73; /, n = 74; etanercept/, n = 79); 138 (6.8%) completed the Week 14 visit. The most common reasons for withdrawal from the -extension phase were lack of efficacy (n = 27, 11.9%), lost to follow-up (n = 25, 11.%) and withdrawal by patient (n = 24, 1.6%). Baseline characteristics were balanced between groups. 1 Mean psoriasis duration was 18.2 years, and mean PASI score was 19.6. 1 Efficacy At Week 16, significantly greater proportions of patients receiving vs. placebo achieved PASI-75 (39.8% vs. 11.9%, P <.1). In patients who continued or were switched from placebo or etanercept to during the extension phase, PASI-75 response rate was maintained across treatment groups at Week 52 (range, 52.7% 57.%) 1 and Week 14 (45.9% 51.9%; Table 1; Fig. 1) and was similar between treatment groups. At Week 16, mean percentage improvement in PASI score was significantly greater with compared with placebo (P <.1). Mean percentage improvement in PASI score was maintained across treatment groups at Week 52 (range, 66.2% 75.1%) 1 and continued through Week 14 (63.3% 7.1%; Table 1). Likewise, achievement of spga response was significantly greater with vs. placebo at Week 16 (21.7% vs. 3.6%, P =.5) 1 ; achievement was 24.3% 35.6% across treatment groups at Week 52 1 and 18.9% 27.4% at Week 14 (Table 1). Other signs and symptoms of psoriasis that were significantly improved at Week 16 with vs. placebo included pruritus, scalp involvement and nail involvement (Fig. 2a and 2b). Improvements were maintained at Week 52 1 and Week 14 in patients who continued or were switched to Table 1 Clinical response across efficacy end points at Week 14 (LOCF) Placebo/ Patient-Years = 95.6 / Patient-Years = 89.4 Etanercept/ Patient-Years = 12.3 PASI-75, n/m (%) 37/73 (.7) 34/74 (45.9) 41/79 (51.9) PASI percentage change from baseline, mean (SD) 63.3 (33.4) 63.7 (28.1) 7.1 (25.5) spga or 1, n/m (%) 2/73 (27.4) 14/74 (18.9) 21/79 (26.6) ScPGA or 1*, n/m (%) 25/ (.) 29/49 (59.2) 3/53 (56.6) NAPSI-, n/m (%) 18/37 (48.6) 29/48 (6.4) 3/46 (65.2) NAPSI percentage change from baseline*, mean (SD) 48.1 (49.6) (n = 33) Pruritus VAS change from baseline, mean (SD), mm 32.3 (33.4) (n = 7) 48.2 (48.4) (n = 48) 26.6 (29.1) (n = 71) 51.1 (72.2) (n = 45) 24.4 (31.2) (n = 73) DLQI 5, n (%) 34/51 (66.7) 29/4 (72.5) 33/ (66.) DLQI change from baseline, mean (SD) 5.6 (6.3) (n = 69) 7.5 (7.) (n = 73) 5.2 (7.3) (n = 73) Data are from patients who entered the -extension phase and were treated in the phase; missing values were imputed using LOCF. *For ScPGA or 1, data are from patients with ScPGA 3 (moderate or greater) at baseline and for NAPSI mean percentage change, among patients with NAPSI 1 at baseline. For DLQI 5, data are from patients with data at Week 14. n/m, number of responders/number of patients who entered and were treated in the -extension phase. DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; NAPSI, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; NAPSI-, % reduction from baseline in NAPSI score; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI-75, 75% reduction from baseline in PASI score; spga, static Physician Global Assessment; ScPGA, Scalp Physician Global Assessment.

4 Reich et al. Patients achieving PASI-75 response (%) 8 6 4 2 * Placebo/, n/m /, n/m Etanercept/, n/m 16 52 14 Week Placebo Placebo/ / Etanercept Etanercept/ Wk 16 Wk 52 Wk 14 1/84 39/73 37/73 33/83 39/74 34/74 4/83 45/79 41/79 Figure 1 PASI-75 response over 14 weeks with treatment (LOCF). *P <.1, and etanercept vs. placebo. The vertical lines indicate two-sided 95% confidence intervals. Missing values were imputed using LOCF methodology. n/m, number of patients with PASI-75 response/number of patients included in the LOCF analysis at the time point (mitt population for Week 16 [patients who entered and were treated in the -extension phase for Weeks 52 and 14]). Numbers of patients in each group with an observation at each time point were: Week 16: placebo n = 73, n = 74, etanercept n = 81; Weeks 52 and 14 (respectively): placebo/ n = 61 and n = 49, / n = 57 and n = 42, etanercept/ n = 67 and n = 52. LOCF, last observation carried forward; mitt, modified intent to treat; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; PASI-75, 75% reduction from baseline in PASI score. during the -extension phase. Mean change from baseline in pruritus VAS score across treatment groups was 31.7 to 35.9 mm at Week 52 1 and 24.4 to 32.3 mm at Week 14 (Table 1). At Weeks 52 and 14, ScPGA response of (clear) or 1 (minimal) was achieved by 52.% 6.4% 1 and.% 59.2% of patients, respectively, across treatment groups (Table 1; Fig. 2a). Mean percentage change from baseline in NAPSI score ranged from 44.6% to 6.7% at Week 52 1 and 48.1% to 51.1% at Week 14 (Table 1; Fig. 2b). At Weeks 52 and 14, NAPSI- was achieved by.% 67.4% and 48.6% 65.2% of patients, respectively, across treatment groups (Table 1). At baseline, mean (SD) DLQI scores were 11.4 (6.3), 13.8 (6.6) and 12.5 (7.) in the placebo, and etanercept groups, respectively. At Week 16, there was a significant improvement with vs. placebo in total DLQI score (mean change from baseline, 8.3 vs. 3.8, P <.1). 1 At Weeks 52 and 14, mean change from baseline in DLQI score was 6.7 to 8.2 1 and 5.2 to 7.5 points, respectively (Table 1). At Week 16, across treatment groups, 53.4% 65.% of patients achieved a DLQI score 5 (P = NS vs. placebo) (Fig. 2c). At (a) (b) (c) Patients achieving ScPGA response of or 1 (%) Mean % change from baseline in NAPSI score Patients achieving DLQI 5 (%) Placebo Placebo/ / Etanercept Etanercept/ 1 8 52. 59.2. 53.1 * 6.4 56.6. 44.4 6 25.9 4 2 n/m= 15/58 26/ 25/ 24/54 26/49 29/49 27/54 32/53 3/53 n= -2-4 -6-8 -1 1 8 6 4 2 n/m= NAPSI Mean Percentage Change Placebo Placebo/ / Etanercept Etanercept/ 42-1.1 43 33-4. -48.1 Wk 16 Wk 52 Wk 14-18.7-42.8-48.2 Weeks 52 and 14, DLQI 5 was achieved by 65.2% 74.6% and 66.% 72.5% of patients, respectively, across treatment groups (Table 1; Fig. 2c). Among patients remaining in the study at Week 14, 19/51 (37.3%), 12/4 (3.%) and 13/ (26.%) achieved a DLQI score of or 1 at Week 14 in the placebo/, / and etanercept/ groups, respectively. DLQI 5 48 Wk 16 Wk 52 Wk 14-37.7 Placebo Placebo/ / Etanercept Etanercept/ 53.4 39/73 74.6 66.7 44/59 34/51 ScPGA Response 62. 44/71 72.5 66.1 37/56 29/4 65. 52/8 45-51.1-56.1 65.2 66. 43/66 33/ Wk 16 Wk 52 Wk 14 Figure 2 Improvement in scalp (a) and nail (b) psoriasis and quality of life (c) over 14 weeks with treatment. *P =.83 vs. placebo. P =.458 vs. placebo. P =.24 vs. placebo. n/m, number of responders/number of patients with data at time of observation. Week 16 group comparisons based on Cochran Mantel Haenszel test stratified by baseline body mass index (<3 kg/m 2 and 3 kg/m 2 ). Missing values for improvements in scalp and nail psoriasis were imputed using LOCF methodology. The vertical lines indicate two-sided 95% confidence intervals. ScPGA response ( [clear] or 1 [minimal]) examined among patients with ScPGA 3 (moderate or greater) at baseline; NAPSI examined among patients with NAPSI 1 at baseline; DLQI 5 examined among all patients who had data at time of observation (i.e. completers, without imputation; both P=NS vs. placebo at Week 16). DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; LOCF, last observation carried forward; mitt, modified intent to treat; NAPSI, Nail Psoriasis Severity Index; ScPGA, Scalp Physician Global Assessment.

Efficacy and safety over 14 weeks of treatment 41 Table 2 Summary of adverse events during the -extension phase (Weeks 16 14) Placebo/* n = 73 Patient-years = 95.6 / n = 74 Patient-years = 89.4 Patients, n (%) 1 AE 45 (61.6) 49 (66.2) 54 (68.4) 1 Severe AE 4 (5.5) 4 (5.4) 7 (8.9) 1 SAE 5 (6.8) 3 (4.1) 4 (5.1) AE leading to withdrawal 3 (4.1) 4 (5.4) 2 (2.5) AE leading to death (.) (.) (.) AEs occurring in 5% of patients in any treatment group, n (%) Diarrhoea 13 (17.8) 4 (5.4) 6 (7.6) Nausea 5 (6.8) 3 (4.1) 5 (6.3) URTI 5 (6.8) 5 (6.8) 1 (1.3) Bronchitis 1 (1.4) 4 (5.4) 1 (1.3) Nasopharyngitis 4 (5.5) 2 (2.7) 5 (6.3) Headache 5 (6.8) 2 (2.7) 3 (3.8) Sinusitis (.) 1 (1.4) 5 (6.3) Pain in extremity 1 (1.4) 3 (4.1) 4 (5.1) Arthralgia 4 (5.5) 4 (5.4) 3 (3.8) Rebound psoriasis 1 (1.4) 2 (2.7) 7 (8.9) Psoriasis 2 (2.7) 4 (5.4) (.) Etanercept/ n = 79 Patient-years = 12.3 Data are from patients who entered the -extension phase and were treated in the phase. *No dose titration for. Dose titration for. Each patient is counted once for each applicable category. AE, adverse event; SAE, serious adverse event; URTI, upper respiratory tract infection. Safety During the -extension phase, most AEs were mild or moderate in severity, and incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) was similar across groups (Table 2). Discontinuation rates due to AEs were generally low across groups during the -extension phase. No deaths occurred during the study. For AEs that occurred in 5% of patients during the placebo-controlled phase (diarrhoea, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, nasopharyngitis, headache and tension headache 1 ), no increase in incidence was observed among patients in the / group with long-term exposure (Table 2). No psychiatric AEs occurred in 5% of patients during the placebo-controlled phase or with long-term exposure in patients who continued or were switched to. 1 During the -extension phase, four patients in the / group reported five psychiatric AEs (n = 1 [1.4%] each AE): anxiety, depression, insomnia, depressed mood and stress. Among placebo/ or etanercept/ patients, one in each group (1.4%, 1.3%, respectively) experienced an AE of depression, anxiety and insomnia. Among placebo/ patients, psychotic disorder and suicidal ideation were experienced by one (1.4%) patient each; among etanercept/ patients, two patients (2.5%) experienced altered mood. In patients reporting AEs of rebound psoriasis in the etanercept/ group, the majority of events (five of seven) involved loss of PASI response after treatment was discontinued or completed, and no patients experienced worsening of PASI score 125% of baseline. All cases of diarrhoea and nausea occurring in the extension phase were mild or moderate in severity and generally resolved within 1 month. Of note, patients in the placebo/ group had no dose titration with at Week 16, which likely explains the higher incidence of diarrhoea in the placebo/ group (17.8%) compared with incidence of diarrhoea with during the placebo-controlled phase (1.8%). 1 Marked laboratory abnormalities were infrequent and transient; incidence remained low across groups with continued treatment through 14 weeks. At Week 14, mean percentage change from baseline in bodyweight was 1.1% (placebo/),.21% (/) and 1.9% (etanercept/). Discussion treatment in biologic-naive patients with moderate to severe psoriasis was effective and safe for up to 14 weeks, with improvements in skin, scalp, nails, pruritus and QOL. Efficacy and safety were maintained in patients who switched from etanercept to and remained in the study at Week 14. Patients also experienced minimal impact of psoriasis on QOL, with 66% of patients achieving DLQI 5 at

42 Reich et al. Week 14. Improved QOL may help motivate patients to maintain treatment over time, which may lead to better disease control. The safety profile of during the -extension phase was consistent with the ESTEEM and PALACE trials. 2 7 References 1 Reich K, Gooderham M, Green L et al. The efficacy and safety of, etanercept, and placebo in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a phase IIIb, randomized, placebo-controlled trial (LIBERATE). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 217; 31: 7 517. 2 Papp K, Reich K, Leonardi CL et al., an oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results of a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (Efficacy and Safety Trial Evaluating the Effects of in Psoriasis [ESTEEM 1]). J Am Acad Dermatol 215; 73: 37 49. 3 Paul C, Cather J, Gooderham M et al. Efficacy and safety of, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks: a phase III, randomized, controlled trial (ESTEEM 2). Br J Dermatol 215; 173: 1387 1399. 4 Kavanaugh A, Mease PJ, Gomez-Reino JJ et al. Longterm (52-week) results of a phase III randomized, controlled trial of in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Rheumatol 215; 42: 479 488. 5 Cutolo M, Myerson GE, Fleischmann R et al. A phase III, randomized, controlled trial of in patients with psoriatic arthritis: results of the PALACE 2 trial. J Rheumatol 216; 43: 1724 1734. 6 Edwards CJ, Blanco FJ, Crowley J et al., an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in patients with psoriatic arthritis and current skin involvement: a phase III, randomised, controlled trial (PALACE 3). Ann Rheum Dis 216; 75: 165 173. 7 Wells AF, Edwards CJ, Kivitz AJ et al. monotherapy as the first systemic treatment in DMARD-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 3-year treatment results [abstract 168]. Arthritis Rheumatol 216; 68 (suppl 1): 168.