TAVI in Rabin Medical Center -

Similar documents
Treatment of Bio-Prosthetic Valve Deterioration Using Transcatheter Techniques

An Update on the Edwards TAVR Results. Zvonimir Krajcer, MD Director, Peripheral Intervention Texas Heart Institute at St.

1-YEAR OUTCOMES FROM JOHN WEBB, MD

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic valve stenosis with the ACURATE neo2 valve system: 30-day safety and performance outcomes

Aortic valve implantation using the femoral and apical access: a single center experience.

Valve Disease in Patients With Heart Failure TAVI or Surgery? Miguel Sousa Uva Hospital Cruz Vermelha Lisbon, Portugal

Is TAVR the treatment of choice for high risk diabetic patients with aortic stenosis? Insights from the FRANCE2 Registry

Outcome of Next-Generation Transcatheter Valves in Small Aortic Annuli: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Comparison

Trend and Outcomes of Direct Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from a Single-Center Experience

Ian T. Meredith AM. MBBS, PhD, FRACP, FCSANZ, FACC, FAPSIC. Monash HEART, Monash Health & Monash University Melbourne, Australia

TAVR IN INTERMEDIATE-RISK PATIENTS

Predictors, incidence and outcomes of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation complicated by stroke

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. SSVQ November 23, 2012 Centre Mont-Royal 15:40

Multicentre clinical study evaluating a novel resheatable self-expanding transcatheter aortic valve system

TAVI in Korea, How to Avoid Conduction

Paris, August 28 th Gian Paolo Ussia on behalf of the CoreValve Italian Registry Investigators

Current Evidence in TAVI patients using ACURATE and LOTUS valves

LOW RISK TAVR. WHAT THE FUTURE HOLDS

Indication, Timing, Assessment and Update on TAVI

SAPIEN 3: Evaluation of a Balloon- Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve in High-Risk and Inoperable Patients With Aortic Stenosis One-Year Outcomes

TAVR 2018: TAVR has high clinical efficacy according to baseline patient risk! ii. Con

TAVR SPRING 2017 The evolution of TAVR

Incorporating the intermediate risk in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI)

Aortic Valve Practice Guidelines: What Has Changed and What You Need to Know

TAVI After PARTNER-2 : The Hamilton Approach

TAVR in patients with. End-Stage CKD or in Renal Replacement Therapy:

Is TAVR Now Indicated in Even Low Risk Aortic Valve Disease Patients

Aortic Stenosis and TAVR TARUN NAGRANI, MD INTERVENTIONAL AND ENDOVASCULAR CARDIOLOGIST, SOMC

Aortic Valve Stenosis and TAVR: Putting it all together.

Successful Transfemoral Edwards Sapien Aortic. Valve Implantation in a Patient with Previous. Mitral Valve Replacement

One-year outcomes with the transcatheter LOTUS Edge Aortic Valve System

TAVR for low-risk patients in 2017: not so fast.

Le TAVI pour tout le monde?

TAVR-Update Andrzej Boguszewski MD, FACC, FSCAI Vice Chairman, Cardiology Mid-Michigan Health Associate Professor Michigan State University, Central

Supplementary Online Content

30-day Outcomes of The CENTERA Trial a New Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valve. Didier Tchétché, MD On Behalf of the CENTERA Investigators

Maurizio D Amico M.D.

ΔΙΑΔΕΡΜΙΚΗ ΑΝΣΙΚΑΣΑΣΑΗ ΑΟΡΣΙΚΗ ΒΑΛΒΙΔΑ αντιμετώπιση επιπλοκών ΠΕΣΡΟ. ΔΑΡΔΑ, MD, FESC IICE 2012

Catheter-Based Valve-Implantations Using CoreValve and Edwards-Sapien Devices Kornowski, Ran

Interventional procedures guidance Published: 26 July 2017 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg586

CoreValve in a Degenerative Surgical Valve

TAVI: Nouveaux Horizons

TAVR in Intermediate Risk Populations /Optimizing Systems for TAVR

After PARTNER 2A/S3i and SURTAVI: What is the Role of Surgery in Intermediate-Risk AS Patients?

Establishing a New Path Forward for Patients With Severe Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis THE PARTNER TRIAL CLINICAL RESULTS

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Anaesthetic Prespectives

Prince Sultan Cardiac Center Experience Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

TAVI: The Real Deal? Marc Pelletier, MD Head, Department of Cardiac Surgery New Brunswick Heart Centre

Interventional procedures guidance Published: 26 September 2014 nice.org.uk/guidance/ipg504

TAVR today: High Risk, Intermediate Risk Population, and Valve in Valve Therapy

Incidence and Management of Early Implant Failure after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

PORTICO CE TRIAL ASSESSMENT OF THE ST. JUDE MEDICAL PORTICO TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANT AND THE TRANSFEMORAL DELIVERY SYSTEM

TAVI- Is Stroke Risk the Achilles Heel of Percutaneous Aortic Valve Repair?

Optimal Imaging Technique Prior to TAVI -Echocardiography-

PARTNER 2A & SAPIEN 3: TAVI for intermediate risk patients

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) for Treatment of Aortic Valve Stenosis Part A

Rapid deployment aortic valve replacement for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in high risk patients. Β. Κόλλιας, Σ. Ματιάτου, Δ. Αγγουράς.

Emergency TAVI: Does It Exist? Is the Risk Higher?

Results of Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Repair or Replacement

Pacemaker rates Second generation TAVI Devices

The Ross Procedure: Outcomes at 20 Years

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement should NOT be preferred therapy for aortic stenosis

2/15/2018 DISCLOSURES OBJECTIVES. Consultant for BioSense Webster, a J&J Co. Aortic stenosis background. Short history of TAVR

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis

Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in high risk patient groups

The Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR)Program at Southcoast Health. Adam J. Saltzman, MD Cardiovascular Care Center

When Should We Consider TAVI. (Surgeon s Viewpoint)? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

Aortic Stenosis: Background

Edwards Transcatheter AVR: Have the Outcomes Changed after CE Approval?

Transcatheter Therapies For Aortic Valve Disease. March 2017 Brian Whisenant MD

Paravalvular Regurgitation is a Risk Factor Following TAVI

Assessment and Preparation of Patients with TAVI. Rob Tanzola Associate Professor, Queen s University

Edwards Sapien. Medtronic CoreValve. Inoperable FDA approved High risk: in trials. FDA approved

TAVR: Review of the Robust Data from Randomized Trials

Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) in Inoperable Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The PARTNER Trial

Clinical and Echocardiographic Outcomes at 30 Days with the SAPIEN 3 TAVR System in Inoperable, High-Risk and Intermediate-Risk AS Patients

TAVR: Intermediate Risk Patients

The Role of TAVI in high-risk and normal-risk Patients

Dr.ssa Loredana Iannetta. Centro Cardiologico Monzino

Alec Vahanian,FESC, FRCP (Edin.) Bichat Hospital University Paris VII, Paris, France

Peri-operative results and complications in 15,964 transcatheter aortic valve implantations from the German Aortic valve RegistrY (GARY)

Aortic Stenosis Steven F. Bolling, M.D. Professor of Cardiac Surgery University of Michigan

The Silent and Apparent Neurological Injury in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Study (SANITY)

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Prosthesis or Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients:

In Process, Unpublished STS/ACC TVT Registry Manuscripts

Igor Palacios, MD Director of Interventional Cardiology Massachusetts General Hospital Professor of Medicine Harvard Medical School

A new option for the Diagnosis and Management of Valvular Heart Disease. Oregon Comprehensive Valve Center

CIPG Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement- When Is Less, More?

TAVR Valve Thrombosis

Minimalist Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (MA-TAVR)

Surgical AVR: Are there any contraindications? Pyowon Park Samsung Medical Center Seoul, Korea

Predictors of length of stay and duration of tracheal intubation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

The Heart Team and the minimalist approach to TAVR today Is there a conflict? G T Stavridis MD FETCS Onassis Cardiac Surgery Ctr.

30-Day Outcomes Following Implantation of a Repositionable Self-Expanding Aortic Bioprosthesis: First Report From the FORWARD Study

Supplementary Online Content

Appropriate Use of TAVR - now and in the future. A Surgeon s Perspective. Neil Moat Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK

Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis in a Randomized Trial of a Self-Expanding Prosthesis

Eberhard Grube MD, FACC, FSCAI

Risk Patients Before TAVI or AVR

Transcription:

Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive Patients treated with TAVI and Propensity Score Matched- Analysis of Early Versus New Generation Valves Amos Levi, MD, Uri Landes, MD, Abid R Assali, MD, Katia Orvin, MD, Ram Sharony, MD, Hanna Vaknin-Assa, MD, Ashraf Hamdan, MD, Yaron Shapira, MD, Shmuel Schwartzenberg, MD,Pablo Codner, MD, Alexander Sagie, MD, and Ran Kornowski, MD, FACC, FESC

We have no conflict of interests to disclose

n = 587

TAVI in Rabin First Medical tertile Second Center tertile - Last tertile P value Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive (n=186) Patients (n=187) treated with TAVI (n=187) and Propensity Score Matched-Analysis Nov 2008-Sep of Early Versus Sep New 2012-Feb Generation Feb Valves 2015-2012 2015 Oct2016 Age (years) 82.1 ± 5.8 81.9 ± 6.8 81.3 ± 7.3 0.26 Male gender 39% 48% 43% 0.27 Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 4.7 27.4 ± 4.5 28.8 ± 5.4 <0.001 Mean GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 66 ± 27 66 ± 26 61 ± 20 0.04 GFR 30-59 41% 34% 44% 0.14 GFR 15-29 3.8% 4.8% 4.8% 0.9 GFR < 15 1.6% 3.2% 1.6% 0.62 Peripheral vascular disease 19.5% 15% 7.5% 0.004 Chronic obstructive lung disease 26% 16% 12% 0.01 Atrial fibrillation 27% 37% 27% 0.07 Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 8.5 ± 5.1 6.3 ± 3.9 4.7 ± 3.4 <0.001 Logistic Euroscore 21.4 ± 11 18 ± 11.6 15.7 ± 10.7 <0.001 NYHA Functional Class III - IV 97% 93% 78% <0.001 Hospitalization 6 months prior TAVI 53% 53% 42% 0.046 LV DYS Moderate + 17% 13.5% 13% 0.52 Frailty 18% 17% 19% 0.87 Peak aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 79 ± 22 80 ± 23 76 ± 21 0.12 Mean aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 50 ± 15 50 ± 16 48 ± 14 0.11 Mean Aortic Valve Area (cm 2 ) 0.63 ±.19 0.66 ±.19 0.64 ±.19 0.55 Coronary and Peripheral Angiography 98% 99.5% 88% <0.001 Trans-esophageal Echocardiography 173 (93%) 86% 72% <0.001

First tertile Second tertile TAVI in Rabin Medical Center - Last tertile P value Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive (n=186) Patients (n=187) treated with TAVI (n=187) and Propensity Score Matched-Analysis Nov 2008-Sep of Early Versus Sep New 2012-Feb Generation Feb Valves 2015-2012 2015 Oct2016 Age (years) 82.1 ± 5.8 81.9 ± 6.8 81.3 ± 7.3 0.26 Male gender 39% 48% 43% 0.27 Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 4.7 27.4 ± 4.5 28.8 ± 5.4 <0.001 Mean GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 66 ± 27 66 ± 26 61 ± 20 0.04 GFR 30-59 41% 34% 44% 0.14 GFR 15-29 3.8% 4.8% 4.8% 0.9 GFR < 15 1.6% 3.2% 1.6% 0.62 Peripheral vascular disease 19.5% 15% 7.5% 0.004 Chronic obstructive lung disease 26% 16% 12% 0.01 Atrial fibrillation 27% 37% 27% 0.07 Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 8.5 ± 5.1 6.3 ± 3.9 4.7 ± 3.4 <0.001 Logistic Euroscore 21.4 ± 11 18 ± 11.6 15.7 ± 10.7 <0.001 NYHA Functional Class III - IV 97% 93% 78% <0.001 Hospitalization 6 months prior TAVI 53% 53% 42% 0.046 LV DYS Moderate + 17% 13.5% 13% 0.52 Frailty 18% 17% 19% 0.87 Peak aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 79 ± 22 80 ± 23 76 ± 21 0.12 Mean aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 50 ± 15 50 ± 16 48 ± 14 0.11 Mean Aortic Valve Area (cm 2 ) 0.63 ±.19 0.66 ±.19 0.64 ±.19 0.55 Coronary and Peripheral Angiography 98% 99.5% 88% <0.001 Trans-esophageal Echocardiography 173 (93%) 86% 72% <0.001 Cardiac Computed Tomography 50% 42% 88% <0.001

TAVI in Rabin First Medical tertile Second Center tertile - Last tertile P value Long-Term Outcomes of 560 Consecutive (n=186) Patients (n=187) treated with TAVI (n=187) and Propensity Score Matched-Analysis Nov 2008-Sep of Early Versus Sep New 2012-Feb Generation Feb Valves 2015-2012 2015 Oct2016 Age (years) 82.1 ± 5.8 81.9 ± 6.8 81.3 ± 7.3 0.26 Male gender 39% 48% 43% 0.27 Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.5 ± 4.7 27.4 ± 4.5 28.8 ± 5.4 <0.001 Mean GFR (ml/min/1.73m2) 66 ± 27 66 ± 26 61 ± 20 0.04 GFR 30-59 41% 34% 44% 0.14 GFR 15-29 3.8% 4.8% 4.8% 0.9 GFR < 15 1.6% 3.2% 1.6% 0.62 Peripheral vascular disease 19.5% 15% 7.5% 0.004 Chronic obstructive lung disease 26% 16% 12% 0.01 Atrial fibrillation 27% 37% 27% 0.07 Society of Thoracic Surgeons score 8.5 ± 5.1 6.3 ± 3.9 4.7 ± 3.4 <0.001 Logistic Euroscore 21.4 ± 11 18 ± 11.6 15.7 ± 10.7 <0.001 NYHA Functional Class III - IV 97% 93% 78% <0.001 Hospitalization 6 months prior TAVI 53% 53% 42% 0.046 LV DYS Moderate + 17% 13.5% 13% 0.52 Frailty 18% 17% 19% 0.87 Peak aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 79 ± 22 80 ± 23 76 ± 21 0.12 Mean aortic valve gradient (mmhg) 50 ± 15 50 ± 16 48 ± 14 0.11 Mean Aortic Valve Area (cm 2 ) 0.63 ±.19 0.66 ±.19 0.64 ±.19 0.55 Coronary and Peripheral Angiography 98% 99.5% 88% <0.001 Trans-esophageal Echocardiography 93% 86% 72% <0.001

First tertile Second tertile Last tertile P value (n=177) (n=178) (n=178) 30 day All cause death 6 (3.2%) 7 (3.7%) 6 (3.2%) 1 30 day cardiovascular death 5 (2.7%) 5 (2.7%) 4 (2.1%) 0.95 Periprocedural MI 0 (0%) 1 (0.5%) 2 (1.1%) 0.78 In hospital stroke Disabling 2 (1.1%) 2 (1.1%) 7 (3.9%) None-disabling / transient 6 (3.3%) 4 (2.2%) 0 (0%) 0.82 Bleeding Life-Threatening Bleeding 9 (5.1%) 3 (1.7%) 1 (0.6%) 0.036 Major bleeding 12 (6.8%) 11 (6.2%) 6 (3.4%) Acute Kidney Injury AKIN Stage I 19 (10%) 20 (11%) 24 (13%) 0.24 AKIN Stage II 3 (1.6%) 7 (3.8%) 1 (0.5%) AKIN Stage III 7 (3.8%) 8 (4.3%) 3 (1.6%) Vascular Complications Minor Vascular Complication 39 (21%) 25 (13.4%) 35 (18.7%) 0.14 Major Vascular Complication 4 (2.2%) 3 (1.6%) 7 (3.7%) Need for pacemaker * 31 (17.8%) 23 (13.5%) 29 (17.4%) 0.49 Tamponade 7 (3.8%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.5%) 0.003 Paravalvular leak > Mild 23 (12.4%) 30 (16%) 14 (7.6%) 0.029

First tertile Second tertile Last tertile P value (n=177) (n=178) (n=178) 30 day All cause death 6 (3.2%) 7 (3.7%) 6 (3.2%) 1 30 day cardiovamiscular death 5 (2.7%) 5 (2.7%) 4 (2.1%) 0.95 Periprocedural MI 0 (0%) 1 (0.5%) 2 (1.1%) 0.78 In hospital stroke Disabling 2 (1.1%) 2 (1.1%) 7 (3.9%) None-disabling / transient 6 (3.3%) 4 (2.2%) 0 (0%) 0.82 Bleeding Life-Threatening Bleeding 9 (5.1%) 3 (1.7%) 1 (0.6%) 0.036 Major bleeding 12 (6.8%) 11 (6.2%) 6 (3.4%) Acute Kidney Injury AKIN Stage I 19 (10%) 20 (11%) 24 (13%) 0.24 AKIN Stage II 3 (1.6%) 7 (3.8%) 1 (0.5%) AKIN Stage III 7 (3.8%) 8 (4.3%) 3 (1.6%) Vascular Complications Minor Vascular Complication 39 (21%) 25 (13.4%) 35 (18.7%) 0.14 Major Vascular Complication 4 (2.2%) 3 (1.6%) 7 (3.7%) Need for pacemaker * 31 (17.8%) 23 (13.5%) 29 (17.4%) 0.49 Tamponade 7 (3.8%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.5%) 0.003 Paravalvular leak > Mild 23 (12.4%) 30 (16%) 14 (7.6%) 0.029

First tertile (n=177) Second tertile (n=178) Last tertile (n=178) P value Pre-dilatation balloon valvuloplasty 171 (92%) 67 (36%) 45 (24%) <0.001 Post-dilatation balloon valvuloplasty 10 (6.1%) 53 (29%) 43 (23%) <0.001 Need for a second valve 7 (3.8%) 12 (6.4%) 6 (3.2%) 0.32 Hospital stay (days) 5.1 ± 4 4.7 ± 4.1 4.2 ± 3 0.03 Anesthesia type Conscious sedation 132 (71%) 147 (79%) 158 (84.5%) 0.01 General anesthesia 54 (29%) 40 (21%) 29 (15.5%) Access Transfemoral 144 (77.4%) 173 (92.5%) 181 (96.8%) <0.001 Alternative 42 (22.6%) 14 (7.5%) 6 (3.2%)

47% 9.7% 4.8% 29% 9% 10.6%

Independent predictors of long term All cause death (median follow up 25 months) Covariate Multivariate cox analysis HR (95% CI) P Value GFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 1.68 (1.15 2.48) 0.008 Chronic obstructive lung disease 1.54 (1.05-2.27) 0.027 Hospitalization 6 months prior TAVI 1.62 (1.12-2.2) 0.009 Mean AV gradient (per 10 mmhg decrease) 1.16 (1.02 1.27) 0.02 Frailty 1.58 (1.07 2.42) 0.023 In hospital stroke 1.94 (0.99-3.8) 0.055 Independent predictors of 1-year death Covariate Multivariable cox analysis HR (95% CI) P Value Mean AV gradient (per 10 mmhg decrease) 1.32 (1.05-1.59) 0.006 LV Dysfunction moderate or greater 1.92 (0.98-3.75) 0.057 Frailty 2.82 (1.55-5.14) <0.001 In hospital stroke 3.65 (1.45-8.94) 0.005 Major Vascular Complication 3.93 (1.37-11.22) 0.011 Paravalvular leak greater than mild 3 (1.5-6) 0.002

propensity score matched cohort - new generation versus early generation devices Early generation New generation p value 30 day All cause death 4 (2.3%) 6 (3.4%) 0.75 30-day cardiovascular death 4 (2.3%) 4 (2.3%) 1 In hospital stroke 2 (1.1%) 7 (4%) 0.17 Bleeding Life-Threatening Bleeding 5 (2.9%) 2 (1.1%) 0.49 Major bleeding 6 (3.4%) 5 (2.9%) Acute Kidney Injury AKIN Stage I 18 (10%) 23 (13%) 0.69 AKIN Stage II 2 (1.1%) 1 (0.6%) AKIN Stage III 5 (2.9%) 3 (1.7%) Vascular Complications Minor Vascular Complication 37 (21%) 34 (19%) 0.39 Major Vascular Complication 2 (1.1%) 6 (3.4%) Need for pacemaker 26 (14.9%) 27 (15.4%) 1 Ventricular perforation 3 (1.7%) 1 (0.6%) 0.62 Paravalvular leak None/Trace 89 (59%) 120 (83%) <0.001 Mild 36 (27%) 16 (9.3%) > Mild 25 (14%) 12 (7.6%) Mean transaortic gradient 7.5 ± 4.2 5.9 ± 4.3 0.98 Hospital stay (days) 4.1 ± 34 4.3 ± 3.1 0.89 Combined composite outcome 59 (33.7%) 59 (33.7%) 1

Summary Patient selection - shift towards lower risk, better functional class Procedural technique less invasive Long term mortality - ~1/2 within 5 years, mostly due to non-cardiac causes Hemodynamic & functional improvement - sustained for up to 5 years PVL - Incidence decreasing, new generation valves perform better TAVI in Rabin Medical Center -