SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

Similar documents
Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

Safety of the enzymatic preparation Natuphos (3-phytase) for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

The EFSA Journal (2006) 385, 1-9

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 10 July 2007

The EFSA Journal (2006) 384, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the modification of the terms of authorisation of Protural (sodium benzoate) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium carbonate (soda ash) for all species 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 289, 1-6

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of MycoCell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for dairy cows 1

Statement on the safety and efficacy of the product Rosemary extract liquid of natural origin as a technological feed additive for dogs and cats 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Maximum Residue Limits for Clinacox 0.5% (diclazuril) for turkeys for fattening, chickens for fattening and chickens reared for laying 1

Session 47.

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Avizyme 1505 (endo-1,4-β-xylanase, α-amylase, subtilisin) as a feed additive for turkeys for fattening 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 11 July 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

Statement on the preparation of guidance for the assessment of plant/herbal products and their constituents used as feed additives 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Withdrawal period for Coxidin for chickens and turkeys for fattening and re-examination of the provisional Maximum Residue Limit 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Cu) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety of a manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine (Mintrex Mn) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Bonvital (Enterococcus faecium) as a feed additive for dogs 1

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the efficacy of Suilectin (Phaseolus vulgaris lectins) as a zootechnical additive for suckling piglets (performance enhancer)

Scientific Opinion on the Safety and Efficacy of thaumatin for all animal species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Natugrain Wheat TS (endo-1,4-β-xylanase) for use as feed additive for chickens for fattening and ducks 1

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Zn (Zinc chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Abstract

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of the product ColiCure (Escherichia coli) as a feed additive for horses 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2005) 271, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 November 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 29 October 2008 by the GMO Panel

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed and the Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of sodium bisulphate (SBS) for all species as preservative and silage additive 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (adopted on 2 December 2002)

(Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 12 June 2007

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of allylhydroxybenzenes (chemical group 18) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

Safety of Allura Red AC in feed for cats and dogs

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of 25-hydroxycholecalciferol as a feed additive for poultry and pigs 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Adopted on 21 May 2008 by the FEEDAP Panel and on 16 April 2008 by the GMO Panel

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Mn (Manganese chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Formi LHS (potassium diformate) as a feed additive for sows 1

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of synthetic alpha-tocopherol for all animal species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of anthranilate derivatives (chemical group 27) when used as flavourings for all animal species 1

The EFSA Journal (2004) 121, 1-13

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

The EFSA Journal (2006) 337, 1-17

Mardiati Zain,J. Rahman, Khasrad. Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Animal Science, Andalas University, Padang - Indonesia

L 243/10 Official Journal of the European Union

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

The EFSA Journal (2006) 350, 1-14

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q )

The EFSA Journal (2005) 195, 1-10

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Panaferd-AX (red carotenoid-rich bacterium Paracoccus carotinifaciens) as feed additive for salmon and trout 1

Safety and efficacy of Mintrex Cu (Copper chelate of hydroxy analogue of methionine) as feed additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of erythrosine in feed for cats and dogs, ornamental fish and reptiles 1

Transcription:

The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 1-7 SCIENTIFIC OPINION Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1 Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (Question No EFSA-Q-2008-472) Adopted on 1 April 2009 PANEL MEMBERS Georges Bories, Paul Brantom, Joaquim Brufau de Barberà, Andrew Chesson, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Bogdan Debski, Noël Dierick, Jürgen Gropp, Ingrid Halle, Christer Hogstrand, Joop de Knecht, Lubomir Leng, Sven Lindgren, Anne-Katrine Lundebye Haldorsen, Alberto Mantovani, Miklós Mézes, Carlo Nebbia, Walter Rambeck, Guido Rychen, Atte von Wright and Pieter Wester SUMMARY Following a request from the European Commission, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) for use as a feed additive for leisure horses. Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME is a preparation of dried cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CNCM I-1077). It is intended for use as a zootechnical additive in feed for leisure horses at a dose of 3 x 10 9 CFU kg -1 of complete feedingstuffs. In its previous opinion on Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME for leisure horses, the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was not able to conclude on the efficacy of the preparation because of insufficient evidence provided by the company. The applicant has now provided an additional study aiming to demonstrate that the effect of Levucell SC20 for leisure horses corresponds to that for other ruminants, e.g. increase of fibre digestibility. Thus, the current opinion focuses on the assessment of that new study. Evidence that Levucell SC20 is able to produce a significant improvement on fibre digestion was shown in one experiment in adult horses. This effect was consistent with the microbiological analyses of faecal samples, which showed a significant increase in gut cellulolytic bacteria associated with Levucell SC20 supplementation. 1 For citation purposes: Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on a request from the European Commission on efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses. The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 1-7 European Food Safety Authority, 2009

This product has been authorised for use in dairy cows, cattle for fattening, lambs, dairy goats and dairy ewes. The FEEDAP Panel considers that evidence has been provided to show that the effect of S. cerevisiae in horses is similar to that observed in ruminants. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that the efficacy of Levucell SC 20 has been demonstrated in adult leisure horses. Key words: zootechnical additive, micro-organism, yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, leisure horses, efficacy, mode of action The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 2-7

TABLE OF CONTENTS Panel Members... 1 Summary... 1 Table of Contents... 3 Table of Contents... 3 Background as provided by EC... 4 Terms of reference as provided by EC... 4 Acknowledgements... 4 Assessment... 5 1. Introduction... 5 2. Efficacy... 5 Conclusions and Recommendations... 7 Documentation provided to EFSA... 7 References... 7 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 3-7

BACKGROUND AS PROVIDED BY EC Levucell SC for leisure horses Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003 2 establishes rules governing the Community authorisation of additives for use in animal nutrition and in particular defines the conditions that a substance/product should meet to be granted authorisation. The company Lallemand is seeking an authorisation as a feed additive within category of zootechnical additives, functional group other zootechnical additives, of a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Levucell SC 20/ SC10ME, Table 1). Table 1. Product category Zootechnical additives: other zootechnical additives Trade name Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME Description Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077 Target animal category Leisure horses Applicant Lallemand Type of request New authorisation The EFSA in its opinion adopted on 12 September 2006 (Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed on the safety and efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a feed additive for leisure horses) was not able to decide conclusively on the efficacy of the preparation because of lack of data provided by the company. Therefore, the Commission gave the possibility to the company to submit complementary information to complete the assessment. The Commission has received a supplementary dossier from the applicant, Lallemand, containing new data on the efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME for leisure horses. The data generated by the company and included in the above mentioned supplementary dossier have been sent directly to the Authority. 3 TERMS OF REFERENCE AS PROVIDED BY EC In view of the above, the Commission asks the European Food Safety Authority to deliver an opinion on the efficacy of this active agent under the proposed conditions of use. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The European Food Safety Authority wishes to thank the members of the Working Group on Micro-organisms for the preparation of this opinion. 2 OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p.29 3 Dossier reference: FAD-2008-0038 The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 4-7

ASSESSMENT 1. Introduction The additive Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME is a preparation of dried cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae (CNCM I-1077). It is intended for use in feed for leisure horses at a dose of 3 x 10 9 CFU kg -1 of complete feedingstuffs as a zootechnical additive (functional group: other zootechnical additives). This product has been authorised for use in dairy cows and cattle for fattening, 4 lambs, 5 dairy goats and dairy ewes. 6 The Scientific Committee on Animal Nutrition (SCAN) issued an opinion on the safety of this product for beef and dairy cattle, including safety for the user, the consumer and the environment (EC, 1997, updated 2003). The FEEDAP Panel has issued several opinions on the safety and efficacy of this product: one for dairy goats and dairy ewes (EFSA, 2006a), one for leisure horses (EFSA, 2006b) and one for lambs for fattening (EFSA, 2008). In its previous opinion on Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME for leisure horses, the FEEDAP Panel was not able to conclude on the efficacy of the preparation because of insufficient evidence provided by the applicant. In particular, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that In one efficacy study, the differences in weight gain, despite showing significant effects (P <0.05) in favour of the Levucell-treated group, are not convincing because of the low weight gain of the control and the housing-treatment interaction. The opinion also stated that The FEEDAP Panel considers that the effect of S. cerevisiae in a hindgut fermenter, such as the horse, is likely to be similar to that seen in ruminants, where there is evidence of an effect on fibre digestion. Although there was a small but significant difference in body weight gain during the experiment, which may reflect better fibre digestion, this was not directly demonstrated. Consequently, the FEEDAP Panel, in the absence of evidence of a similar mode of action, cannot conclude on the efficacy of the product. The applicant has provided an additional study aiming to demonstrate that the effect of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME for leisure horses corresponds to the one seen in ruminants, e.g. increase of fibre digestibility. Thus, the current opinion focuses on the assessment of that new study. 2. Efficacy With the aim of demonstrating the efficacy of Levucell SC20 for horses, one trial was provided. 7 Six adult horses (initial ages 4 18 years), whose average weight at the start of the trial was 511 ± 28 kg, were individually housed in stalls equipped with feeding troughs and bedded with wood shavings to avoid uncontrolled ingestion of vegetable matter such as straw. Animals were fed a basal diet consisting of feedstuff concentrate (35 % of the total daily feed) supplemented with grass hay (65 %). The feedstuff concentrate contained corn, barley, lucerne, mineral mix, flax seed and cane molasses. The experimental design was a 3 x 3 Latin square (three groups of two horses; three treatments). The treatments were, respectively, control and supplementation with Levucell SC20 at doses of 2 x 10 10 CFU head -1 day -1 and 6 x 10 10 CFU head -1 day -1. 4 OJ 195, 27.7.2005, p. 6 5 OJ L 340, 19.12.2009, p. 38 6 OJ L 64, 2.3.2007, p. 26 7 Technical dossier/annex 1Trial Report The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 5-7

In the trial, the additive was top-dressed onto the morning concentrate. The two doses used (2 x 10 10 and 6 x 10 10 CFU head -1 day -1 ), based on the expected daily feed intake of 6.7 kg and on the microbiological analysis of the additive, can be translated into calculated doses of approximately 3 x 10 9 and 1 x 10 10 CFU kg -1 feed. All the horses were fed the control diet for a seven-day transitional period preceding the initiation of the study. This was followed by three successive experimental 28-day periods, each consisting of three sub-periods: 14 days of adaptation to the treatment doses, seven days of measurements and seven days of wash-out. The end points focussed on the measurement of apparent digestibility of dry matter and fibre, on faecal ph and analysis of faecal microbiota. The quantity of feed refused was measured to determine the exact quantity of dry matter ingested. Faeces excreted were weighed each day. The dry matter and the proportions of fibre fractions (NDF, ADF and acid detergent lignin ADL) were determined on each sample. On day seven of each experimental period, faeces were collected directly from the rectum of each horse four hours after the morning meals. The ph was determined immediately after collection. Those faecal samples were analysed for total anaerobes, cellulolytic bacteria, streptococci, lactobacilli and lactic acid utilising bacteria. Statistical analyses were carried out using one-way ANOVA. The experiment showed a significant treatment-related improvement of dry matter digestibility, largely attributable to an increase in apparent fibre digestion (Table 2). A significant effect was observed at the calculated recommended dose (3 x 10 9 CFU kg -1 feed) and at a higher dose. Table 2. Effect of Levucell SC 20 on dry matter and fibre fractions digestibility Levucell DM 1 NDF 2 ADF 3 0 66.2 a 49.5 A 42.8 A 2 x 10 10 CFU day -1 69.9 b 52.0 B 45.6 B (3 x 10 9 CFU kg -1 feed) 6 x 10 10 CFU day -1 (1 x 10 10 CF kg -1 feed) 70.5 b 52.3 B 45.0 B 1 2 3 Different superscripts indicate significant differences at A,B (P < 0.01) and a,b (P < 0.05) Dry matter Neutral detergent fibre Acid detergent fibre Microbiological analysis of faecal samples revealed a significant increase (P < 0.01) of total anaerobes and cellulolytic bacteria during the experimental periods of Levucell SC20 supplementations. The counts of other bacterial groups were not affected by treatment, with the exception of the expected higher numbers of yeast cells. The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 6-7

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CONCLUSIONS Evidence that Levucell SC20 is able to produce a beneficial effect on fibre digestibility was demonstrated in one experiment in adult horses. A demonstration of the effect is also provided by the microbiological analyses of faecal samples, which showed a significant increase in gut cellulolytic bacteria associated with Levucell SC20 supplementation. This product has been authorised for use in dairy cows, cattle for fattening, lambs, dairy goats and dairy ewes. The FEEDAP Panel considers that evidence has been provided to show that the effect of S. cerevisiae on fibre digestion in horses is similar to that observed in ruminants. Therefore, the FEEDAP Panel concludes that the efficacy of Levucell SC20 as a digestibility enhancer is demonstrated in adult leisure horses. The FEEDAP Panel extends the above conclusions to both forms of Levucell SC. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the product is categorised under the functional groups digestibility enhancers and gut flora stabilisers. DOCUMENTATION PROVIDED TO EFSA 1. Application for the use of Levucell SC 20 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-1077) in leisure horses (FAD-2005-0018). Submission of supplementary efficacy data. July 2008. Submitted by Lallemand. REFERENCES EC (European Commission), 1997, updated 2003. Opinion on the use of certain microorganisms as additives in feedingstuffs. <http://ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scan/out93_en.pdf> EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006a. Opinion of the Panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on the safety and efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a feed additive for dairy goats and dairy ewes in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1831/2003. <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/efsa/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620782934.htm> EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006b. Opinion of the Panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on the safety and efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a feed additive for leisure horses. <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/efsa/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620782659.htm> EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Opinion of the Panel on additives and products or substances used in animal feed (FEEDAP) on the Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening. <http://www.efsa.europa.eu/cs/blobserver/scientific_opinion/feedap_op_ej772_levucell_e n.pdf?ssbinary=true> The EFSA Journal (2009) 1040, 7-7