Articles in PresS. J Neurophysiol (December 18, 2002). 10.1152/jn.00714.2002 NMDA-RECEPTOR DEPENDENT LONG-TERM SYNAPTIC DEPRESSION IN THE ENTORHINAL CORTEX IN VITRO Saïd Kourrich and C. Andrew Chapman Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8 Running head: LTD in the Entorhinal Cortex. Corresponding author: C. Andrew Chapman Center for Studies in Behavioral Neurobiology, Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 1455 demaisonneuve Blvd. W., Rm. H-1013 Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1M8 Tel: (514) 848-2220 Fax: (514) 848-2817 E-mail: chapman@csbn.concordia.ca Key Words: LTD, Piriform, Paired-pulse, GABA, Metabotropic glutamate receptor. Copyright (c) 2002 by the American Physiological Society.
2 ABSTRACT The entorhinal cortex receives a large projection from the piriform (primary olfactory) cortex and, in turn, provides the hippocampal formation with most of its cortical sensory input. Synaptic plasticity in this pathway may therefore affect the processing of olfactory information and memory encoding. We have recently found that long-term synaptic depression (LTD) can be induced in this pathway in vivo by repetitive paired-pulse stimulation, but not by low-frequency (1 Hz) stimulation with single pulses. Here, we have used field potential recordings to investigate the stimulation parameters and transmitter receptors required for the induction of LTD in the rat entorhinal cortex in vitro. The effectiveness of low-frequency stimulation (900 pulses at 1 or 5 Hz) and repeated delivery of pairs of stimulation pulses (30 ms interpulse interval) was assessed. Only repeated paired-pulse stimulation resulted in lasting LTD, and a low-intensity paired-pulse stimulation protocol that induces LTD in vivo was only effective in the presence of the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline (50 :M). LTD could also be induced in normal ACSF, however, by increasing the number of pulse-pairs delivered, and by increasing the stimulation intensity during LTD induction. The induction of LTD was blocked by constant bath application of the NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist APV (50 :M), indicating that LTD is dependent on NMDA receptor activation. However, LTD was not blocked by the group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist E4-CPG (500 :M), or by bicuculline (50 :M). The induction of LTD in the entorhinal cortex in vitro is therefore dependent on intense stimulation that recruits activation of NMDA receptors, but does not require concurrent activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors or inhibitory synaptic inputs.
3 The superficial layers of the entorhinal cortex are a major site of convergence for sensory information from a number of cortical sensory and association areas, and also provide the hippocampal formation with most of its cortical sensory input (9). Although a great deal of work has focussed on the mechanisms of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus, bidirectional synaptic modification in the entorhinal cortex may also play an essential role in the integration of multimodal sensory information and in the mnemonic functions of the medial temporal lobe. Long-term potentiation (LTP), an enduring increase in synaptic strength resulting from intense activation of afferents (34), has been characterized in the superficial layers of the entorhinal cortex both in vitro (3, 18, 52) and in vivo (12, 13, 42). Synaptic depression effects are thought to complement synaptic potentiation during the formation of memory (1, 6, 8, 16), and we have also recently demonstrated the induction of long-term synaptic depression (LTD; 7, 31) in piriform cortex efferents to the entorhinal cortex in the awake rat (R.Bouras and C.A.Chapman, unpublished observations). Although LTD in the hippocampus has conventionally been induced using prolonged (15 min) 1 Hz stimulation trains, this type of stimulation has been most effective in slices taken from juvenile animals (21, 36), and is generally ineffective in slices taken from the adult (22, 32, 49), and in in vivo preparations (20, 23, 46, see 28). An alternative pattern of stimulation, in which pairs of stimulation pulses separated by a short interval (25 ms) are repeatedly delivered at 0.5 to 1 Hz, induces LTD more effectively. Repetitive paired-pulse stimulation induces NMDA receptor-dependent LTD in the adult CA1 region in vivo (19, 47), and a similar pattern of pairedburst stimulation induces LTD in the dentate gyrus in vivo (48), and reverses LTP of
4 hippocampal inputs to the prefrontal cortex (10). In the CA1, LTD induced by paired-pulse stimulation is blocked by GABA A receptor antagonism (47) and by reducing the stimulation intensity in order to limit activation of local inhibitory interneurons (19). This stimulation pattern is therefore thought to be effective because the first pulse activates local interneurons that cause postsynaptic inhibition during the EPSPs evoked by the second pulse. Our previous observations have shown that LTD in piriform cortex efferents to the entorhinal cortex can be induced by repetitive paired-pulse stimulation in the awake rat, but the contribution of inhibitory mechanisms is not clear. Repetitive stimulation using a 30 ms interval that evokes strong paired-pulse facilitation induced LTD, but stimulation using a 10 ms interval that evokes little facilitation did not. However, inhibitory postsynaptic potentials and action potential afterhyperpolarizations are also observed in vitro at the same latencies that evoke paired-pulse facilitation (4, 25), and an inhibitory current source, which peaks at a latency of 45 ms, also occurs in the superficial layers of the entorhinal cortex in vivo following piriform cortex stimulation (12). Therefore, even though LTD was induced by stimulation that evokes pairedpulse facilitation, concurrent activation of inhibitory mechanisms may also contribute. The induction of LTD in the entorhinal cortex in vivo is blocked by MK-801, indicating that it requires NMDA receptor activation, but metabotropic glutamate receptors (mglur) might also play a role. In the CA1, LTD induction is typically attributed to moderate increases in intracellular Ca 2+ via the NMDA receptor (5, 31), but has also been linked to mglur activation (26, 38, 40, 50). Metabotropic receptors also contribute to LTD induction in the dentate gyrus (11, 35) and cerebellum (17). Further, combined mglur and AMPA/kainate receptor activation is required for a form of LTD in the CA1 that is induced by repeated stimulation that evokes
5 paired-pulse facilitation (30). In the present study, we have used extracellular field potential recordings to determine the effective stimulus parameters for LTD induction in layer II of the entorhinal cortex, and to evaluate the involvement of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic transmission in the induction of LTD. Tests were conducted using low-frequency stimulation with single pulses (1 or 5 Hz), and with pairs of stimulation pulses using a 30 ms interpulse interval that effectively induces LTD in vivo. Neurotransmitter receptor blockers were used to assess the contribution of NMDA receptors, mglurs, and GABA A receptor-mediated inhibition in the induction of LTD. MATERIALS AND METHODS Slices Experiments were performed on slices obtained from male Long-Evans rats (3 to 5 weeks old) as described previously (14). All chemicals were obtained from Sigma unless otherwise indicated. Animals were anesthetized with halothane and brains were rapidly removed and cooled (4 C) in oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF). Horizontal slices (400 :m) were cut using a vibratome (WPI, Vibroslice). ACSF consisted of (in mm) 124 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.25 NaH 2 PO 4, 2 MgSO 4, 2 CaCl 2, 26 NaHCO 3, and 10 dextrose. Slices were placed on a nylon net in a gas-fluid interface recording chamber (Fine Science Tools) in which oxygenated ACSF was perfused at 1.0 ml/min. Slices were maintained at 22 to 24 C, and exposed to a humidified 95% O 2, 5% CO 2 atmosphere. There was a recovery period of one hour before electrophysiological recordings.
6 Stimulation and Recording For recordings of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fepsp), glass micropipettes were filled with 2 M NaCl (2 to 5 MS) and positioned with the aid of a dissecting microscope (Leica, MS5) in the lateral portion of the medial entorhinal cortex near the layer I-II border at a depth of 75 to 200 :m below the surface of the slice. A platinum, concentric bipolar stimulating electrode (Frederick Haer & Co.) was placed in layer I, 1.0 to 2.0 mm rostral to the recording electrode. Constant current pulses (0.1 ms, 25-200 :A) were delivered using a stimulus generator (WPI, Model A300) and a stimulus isolation unit (Model A360). Evoked field potentials were filtered (DC-3 khz) and amplified with an AxoClamp 2B amplifier (Axon Instr.), and responses were monitored using an oscilloscope (Gould, Model 1602), and digitized at 20 khz (Axon Instr., Digidata 1322A) for storage on computer hard-disk using the software package Clampex 8.1 (Axon Instr.). Responses to test-pulses were monitored every 20 sec using an intensity adjusted to evoke fepsps with an amplitude of.60 to 70% of the maximum. This intensity was determined by delivering pulses from 25 to 200 :A in 25 :A increments. Tests for LTD were conducted only on slices with stable fepsps (<±5%) during the 20 minute baseline period. LTD Induction. Groups of slices received different patterns of stimulation to induce LTD. In tests of low-frequency stimulation with single pulses, slices received either 900 pulses at 1 Hz for 15 min, or 900 pulses at 5 Hz for 3 min. Other tests used low-frequency (0.5 or 1.0 Hz) delivery of pairs of stimulation pulses using a 30 ms interpulse interval that induces LTD in the entorhinal cortex in vivo. The first groups received either 450 pairs delivered at 0.5 Hz for 15 min, or 900 pairs delivered at 1 Hz for 15 min. The latter pattern was also delivered while
7 increasing the stimulation intensity to a level that evoked a fepsp 90% of the maximal amplitude. To determine the role of the number of pulses, this pattern was also delivered using only 450 pulse-pairs over 7.5 min. Pharmacology. The dependence of LTD induction on activation of NMDA glutamate receptors was tested by delivering the intense repetitive paired-pulse stimulation pattern (900 pairs) during constant bath application of 50 :M DL-2-amino-5-phosphonovalerate (APV). The involvement of metabotropic glutamate receptors was assessed using the group I/II antagonist (RS)-"-ethyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (E4-CPG, 500 :M, Tocris; 41). The role of ionotropic inhibitory synaptic transmission was assessed in other experiments by blocking GABA A receptors with constant bath application of 50 :M bicuculline. Data Analysis. The slope and peak amplitude of fepsps were analysed using the program Clampfit (Axon Instr.). Data were standardized to the mean of baseline responses for plotting and were expressed as the mean ± the standard error of the mean. The same pattern of changes was observed in both the slope and amplitude of the fepsp, but there was less variability in the measures of amplitude which are therefore shown. Changes in fepsps were assessed using mixed design ANOVAs (and Neuman-Keuls tests) that compared the average responses during the baseline period, 5 min after conditioning stimulation, and during the last 5 min of the recording periods. RESULTS Field potentials evoked in layer II of the entorhinal cortex by stimulation of layer I afferents were similar to those observed in previous in vitro studies (3, 52), and contained an
8 initial fiber volley followed by a negative fepsp with a mean amplitude of 0.57 ±0.02 mv (e.g., Figure 1A, inset). Neither transient nor lasting depression effects observed in the fepsps were associated with changes fiber volley amplitude. Low-Frequency Stimulation Fifteen min of 1 Hz stimulation caused a small, transient depression that peaked 5 min after the stimulation (93.8 ±5.0% of baseline; n=11; F 3,72 =4.94, p<0.01; N-K, p<0.05), but did not cause a lasting depression of fepsps (p=0.47; Figure 1A). Response amplitudes were 101.8 ±4.3% of baseline after 60 min. To determine if a higher frequency of stimulation could induce LTD more effectively, 5 Hz stimulation trains were delivered, and the train duration was set to 3 min in order to hold the number of pulses (900) constant. Five Hz stimulation resulted in a transient depression of fepsps that peaked after about 5 min (n=6; p<0.05; Figure 1B). Although the size of the transient depression (85.9 ±3.3% of baseline) was larger than that induced by 1 Hz stimulation, there was no significant LTD either 30 minutes (95.3 ±2.4%) or 60 minutes (98.8 ±3.2%; p=0.85) following 5 Hz stimulation. Responses in control slices remained stable throughout the recording period (99.9 ±1.5% of baseline after 60 min; Figure 1C). Repetitive Paired-Pulse Stimulation An interpulse interval of 30 ms was chosen for tests of LTD induction because this interval effectively induces LTD in piriform cortex inputs to the entorhinal cortex in vivo. In awake animals, a 10 ms interval causes no net paired-pulse facilitation, and intervals of 30 to 50 ms cause the greatest paired-pulse facilitation (12). In slices, there was a paired-pulse depression at the 10 ms interval (58.3 ±7.3%), and no net facilitation at the 30 ms interval (96.2
9 ±6.8%, not shown). Thus, although responses evoked by the second pulses were smaller in slices, the responses showed a pattern that was similar to that observed in vivo, with the 10 ms interval reflecting the greatest inhibition, and the 30 ms interval evoking the largest paired-pulse responses. In all groups, a stable paired-pulse depression developed during the first 2 to 3 minutes of repetitive stimulation for LTD induction, and the size of this depression was not significantly affected by the intensity of paired-pulse stimulation or drug treatment (84.6 ±9.8% in control medium vs. 82.2 ±7.8% in APV, 72.6 ±11.0% in E4-CPG, and 90.8 ±8.5% in bicuculline). The effectiveness of repetitive paired-pulse stimulation for the induction of LTD was found to be dependent on the level of synaptic inhibition. In normal ACSF, 450 pairs of pulses delivered once every 2 sec, which induces LTD in piriform cortex inputs to the entorhinal cortex in vivo, did not induce LTD in vitro (n=5; Figure 2A). Field EPSP amplitude was reduced to 90.0 ±3.7% of baseline levels 5 min after conditioning stimulation (0.55 ±.07 vs. 0.50 ±0.08 mv; F 3,39 =4.03, p<0.01), but responses returned to baseline levels after about 20 min, and were at 97.0 ±3.2% of baseline after 40 min. LTD was induced, however, when the same stimulation pattern was delivered during constant bath application of bicuculline (50 :M) to reduce synaptic inhibition (n=9; Figure 2B). Responses were reduced to 92.4 ±3.1% of baseline levels 60 min after conditioning stimulation (0.66 ±0.06 vs. 0.61 ±0.06 mv; p<0.01). Increasing the intensity of the stimulation pattern in normal ACSF, by delivering 900 (vs. 450) pairs of pulses at a frequency of 1 Hz, also induced LTD (n=8; F 9,91 =10.00, p<0.001; Figure 3A). Field EPSP amplitude was reduced to 77.3 ±3.0% of baseline levels 5 min after conditioning stimulation, and remained at 90.1 ±2.7% of baseline levels at the end of the 60 min
10 follow-up period (0.52 ±0.07 vs. 0.57 ±0.08 mv; p<0.01). Further increasing the intensity of the stimulation pattern by raising the intensity of stimulation pulses during LTD induction (to 90% of asymptotic levels) increased the amount of LTD induced by 900 pairs at 1 Hz (n=9; Figure 3B). Field EPSP amplitude was reduced to 62.9 ±5.2% of baseline 5 min after conditioning stimulation and remained at 81.0 ±3.3% of baseline after 60 min (0.38 ±0.03 vs. 0.48 ±0.04 mv; p<0.001). To determine the influence of the number of pulse-pairs on LTD induction, another group of slices received 450, rather than 900, high-intensity pulse-pairs delivered over a 7.5 minute period (n=7; Figure 3C). The smaller number of pulse-pairs induced LTD, but the size of the depression after 60 min (89.1 ±3.8%) was significantly less than that induced by 900 pulse pairs (p<0.05). Because the greatest LTD was induced by intense paired-pulse stimulation at 1 Hz for 15 min (Figure 4), this stimulation pattern was used in further tests to assess the neurotransmitter receptors that are required for LTD induction. NMDA and Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor Antagonism Because NMDA receptor antagonism blocks LTD induction in the entorhinal cortex in vivo, the role of NMDA receptors in the induction of LTD in slices was tested using constant bath application of the NMDA receptor antagonist APV (50 :M). The induction of LTD by intense paired-pulse stimulation at 1 Hz was blocked by APV (n=8; Figure 5A). There was no significant depression 5 min after paired-pulse stimulation, and responses remained at 99.3 ±5.4% of baseline levels after 30 min (0.46 ±0.05 mv vs. 0.47 ±0.04 mv). The role of metabotropic glutamate receptors in LTD induction was tested by delivering intense paired-pulse stimulation during constant bath application of the group I/II mglur antagonist E4-CPG (500 :M). LTD induction was not blocked by E4-CPG (n=6; Figure 5B).
11 Field EPSPs were at 67.7 ±7.6% of baseline levels after 5 min, and the depression was maintained at 75.1 ±4.5% of baseline after 30 min (0.29 ±0.03 vs. 0.40 ±0.05 mv). Further, the amount of LTD induced was similar to that induced in the absence of the drug (Figures 5B vs. 3B). Therefore, activation of NMDA receptors, but not metabotropic glutamate receptors, is required for LTD induction in the entorhinal cortex (F 2,24 =10.49, p<0.001). GABA A Receptor Antagonism In previous studies, LTD induced by paired-pulse stimulation in the CA1 region was found to be dependent on synaptic inhibition as well as NMDA receptor activation (48, 19). The dependence of entorhinal cortex LTD on GABA A receptors was therefore tested using constant bath application of the GABA A receptor antagonist bicuculline (50 :M). Bicuculline did not block the induction of LTD (n=6; Figure 5C). Responses were reduced to 59.6 ±6.5% of baseline levels after 5 min and remained depressed at 74.3 ±6.3% of baseline at the end of the 60 min recording period (0.42 ±0.06 vs. 0.56 ±0.06 mv; F 3,45 =34.40, p=0.001). The amount of LTD induced was similar to that induced in the absence of the drug (Figure 5C vs. 3B), indicating that LTD induction does not require activation of GABA A receptors. DISCUSSION These experiments have investigated the stimulus parameters that are effective for LTD induction in layer II of the entorhinal cortex in vitro, and have assessed the roles of several neurotransmitter receptors in the induction of LTD. The successful induction of LTD was dependent on the intensity of conditioning stimulation. LTD was not induced by 1 or 5 Hz slowfrequency stimulation, and low-intensity paired pulse stimulation induced LTD effectively only
12 in the presence of bicuculline to enhance postsynaptic excitability. LTD was induced in normal ACSF only when the number or intensity of the pulse-pairs was increased. This indicates that LTD in the entorhinal cortex slice requires strong, repetitive synaptic activation, and suggests that a high degree of cooperativity is required to cause sufficient activation of postsynaptic targets (33). The present results, and previous findings that the induction of LTP in the entorhinal cortex requires more intense stimulation trains than in the hippocampus (13, 42), suggests that the entorhinal cortex is particularly resistant to bidirectional modifications of synaptic strength. The requirement of strong stimulation patterns is consistent with the dependence of LTD induction on NMDA receptors (Figure 4). In the entorhinal cortex in vivo, LTD induced by paired-pulse stimulation is blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801 (Bouras and Chapman, unpublished observations), and the present results show that the NMDA receptor antagonist APV blocks LTD induction in the entorhinal cortex slice. LTD was not blocked by the group I/II mglur antagonist E4-CPG, and is also not dependent on synaptic inhibition mediated by GABA A receptors. Therefore, intense, repetitive synaptic stimulation leading to NMDA receptor activation, rather than concurrent activation of mglurs or inhibitory synaptic inputs (19, 47), is the main requirement for LTD induction in the entorhinal cortex. Low-Frequency Stimulation Similar to our previous observations in vivo, we have shown that 1 Hz stimulation does not induce LTD in entorhinal cortex slices (Figure 1A). Although 1 Hz stimulation does induce LTD in the sensorimotor cortex in vivo (15, 27) and in CA1 slices taken from juvenile rats (21, 36), our findings are consistent with the absence of LTD following 1 Hz stimulation in CA1
13 slices from adult rats (22, 32, 49), and in the CA1 (23, 46) and dentate gyrus (2, 19) in vivo. Although 5 Hz stimulation induced a larger short-term depression than did 1 Hz stimulation, LTD was not induced (Figure 1B). Similar to other stimulation protocols used here, 5 Hz stimulation caused a depression that peaked.5 minutes after stimulation, suggesting that depression effects are mediated by gradual activation of signalling and/or expression mechanisms. Slowly developing depression effects are also observed in the hippocampal CA1 region in vivo and in vitro (37, 47). The depression induced by 5 Hz stimulation decayed slowly over a period of.20 minutes and may have resulted from transient activation of mechanisms that mediate the expression of LTD. Five Hz stimulation induces a transient depression in the CA1 in hippocampal cultures that has a time-course similar to that observed here (29). Although 5 Hz stimulation did induce a larger short-lasting depression than 1 Hz stimulation in these acute entorhinal cortex slices, our results show that stimulation with single pulses at these frequencies is insufficient for LTD induction (20, 23, 39). Repetitive Paired-Pulse Stimulation Similar to our previous findings in the awake rat, LTD was induced by repetitive stimulation with pairs of pulses. Surprisingly, however, the parameters that are effective in vivo (450 pairs over 15 min, 30 ms interval) did not induce LTD in slices maintained in normal ACSF, and LTD was induced only after pharmacological reduction of synaptic inhibition (Figure 2) or increasing the intensity of the stimulation pattern (Figure 3). This requirement for more intense stimulation in normal ACSF could be due to greater levels of inhibition in the slice. Although paired-pulse stimulation with a 10 ms interval evokes no net inhibition in vivo (12) there was marked paired-pulse inhibition at this interval in the slice. Further, stimulation using a
14 30 ms interval induces a marked paired-pulse facilitation in vivo, but there was little facilitation in vitro. More intense stimulation may therefore be required for LTD induction in slices, in order to compensate for smaller short-term synaptic facilitation effects. The requirement for more intense stimulation may also be due to the activation of a much smaller number of fibers by the concentric bipolar electrode placed on the surface of the slice. Stimulating electrodes used in vivo have much larger tip separation (0.5 mm), and were positioned to activate a large number of fibers by straddling layer II of the piriform cortex. The number of activated fibers is likely to be much smaller in vitro than in the intact animal, and more intense stimulation is likely required to enhance activation of a smaller number of afferents. Both in vivo and in vitro, however, the dependence of LTD on intense stimulation patterns indicates that a high degree of cooperativity among afferents is required for the induction of LTD (33). Critical Receptors for LTD Induction Previous studies that have induced LTD in the CA1 region with paired-pulse stimulation have used an interpulse interval of 25 ms to evoke paired-pulse inhibition of CA1 pyramidal cell firing. LTD induction by paired-pulse stimulation in the CA1 is blocked by both APV and bicuculline (47), and is also prevented by reducing the pulse intensity to limit the activation of inhibitory circuits (19). The induction of LTD by this stimulation pattern has therefore been attributed to the activation of NMDA glutamate receptors during a period of postsynaptic inhibition initiated by the first of the two pulses (19, 47, 48, see 45). The induction of LTD by manipulations that inhibit cell firing is theoretically attractive because anti-hebbian rules for synaptic modification predict synaptic weakening when presynaptic and postsynaptic activities are poorly correlated. However, paired-pulse stimulation with a 10 ms interval that activates
15 inhibitory mechanisms does not induce LTD in the entorhinal cortex in vivo (Bouras and Chapman, unpublished observations). Further, we have shown here that LTD was not reduced by constant bath application the GABA A receptor blocker bicuculline (Figure 5C). Ionotropic inhibitory synaptic transmission is therefore not required for the induction or expression of LTD in the entorhinal cortex. Activation of NMDA receptors, but not metabotropic glutamate receptors, is required for LTD induction in the entorhinal cortex. The NMDA receptor antagonist APV completely blocked LTD induction (Figure 5A) and this confirms our previous findings in vivo in which LTD was blocked by the NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801. Activation of NMDA receptors is also required for LTD in the hippocampal CA1 (21, 36, 48). We have also shown here that LTD in the entorhinal cortex is not blocked by E4-CPG, and therefore does not require activation of group I or II mglurs. Activation of group I mglurs, which are linked to phospholipase C, induces protein kinase C-dependent LTD in CA1 pyramidal cells (40, 50), and very lowfrequency stimulation combined with exposure to GABA A or GABA B receptor agonists also induces an mglur-dependent form of LTD in the CA1 region (51). Taken together, however, our present results suggest that Ca 2+ entry via NMDA receptors is a sufficient trigger for entorhinal cortex LTD, and that this form of plasticity does not require mglur activation (43, 44). The experiments with APV and E4-CPG also showed that the depression of fepsps during paired-pulse stimulation was prevented by blocking either NMDA receptors or group I/II mglurs. The mechanisms that produce the depression in normal ACSF may therefore depend in part on NMDA receptor-dependent Ca 2+ influx and a group I mglur-mediated reduction in
16 transmitter release (24). The mechanisms that mediate bidirectional synaptic modifications in the entorhinal cortex are likely to have a significant impact on the processing of olfactory information, and on the neuronal representations that are processed by the hippocampal formation. The current report shows that the major characteristics of LTD induction in piriform cortex inputs to the entorhinal cortex in vivo are preserved in the slice preparation. This preparation may therefore be used effectively to identify the intracellular signal transduction mechanisms which mediate the induction and expression of LTD in the entorhinal cortex.
17 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research was funded by grants to C.A.C. from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, the Fonds pour la Formation de Chercheurs et l Aide à la Recherche, and from the Canadian Foundation for Innovation, and by a post-doctoral fellowship to S.K. from Fondation Fyssen (France).
18 REFERENCES 1. Abbott LF, Nelson SB. Synaptic plasticity: taming the beast. Nature 3:1178-1183, 2000. 2. Abraham WC, Mason-Parker SE, Logan B. Low-frequency stimulation does not readily cause long-term depression in the dentate gyrus of awake rats. Brain Res 722:217-221, 1996. 3. Alonso A, de Curtis M, Llinás R. Postsynaptic Hebbian and non-hebbian long-term potentiation of synaptic efficacy in the entorhinal cortex in slices and in the isolated adult guinea pig brain. PNAS 87:9280-9284, 1990. 4. Alonso A, and Klink R. Differential electroresponsiveness of stellate and pyramidal-like cells of medial entorhinal cortex layer II. J Neurophysiol 70:128-142, 1993. 5. Artola A, Singer W. Long-term depression of excitatory synaptic transmission and its relationship to long-term potentiation. TINS 16:480-487, 1993. 6. Bear MF. A synaptic basis for memory storage in the cerebral cortex. PNAS 93:13453-13459, 1996. 7. Bear MF, Abraham WC. Long-term depression in hippocampus. Ann Rev Neurosci 19:437-462, 1996. 8. Braunewell KH, Manahan-Vaughan D. Long-term depression: a cellular basis for learning? Rev Neurosci 12:121-140, 2001. 9. Burwell RD, Amaral, DG. Cortical afferents of the perirhinal, postrhinal and entorhinal cortices of the rat. J Comp Neurol 398:179-205, 1998. 10. Burette F, Jay TM, Laroche S. Reversal of LTP in the hippocampal afferent fiber system to the prefrontal cortex in vivo with low-frequency patterns of stimulation that do not
19 produce LTD. J Neurophysiol 78:1155-1160, 1997. 11. Camodeca N, Breakwell NA, Rowan MJ, Anwyl R. Induction of LTD by activation of group I mglur in the dentate gyrus in vitro. Neuropharmacol 38:1597-1606, 1999. 12. Chapman CA, Racine RJ. Converging inputs to the entorhinal cortex from the piriform cortex and medial septum: facilitation and current source density analysis. J Neurophysiol 78:2602-2615, 1997. 13. Chapman CA, Racine RJ. Piriform cortex efferents to the entorhinal cortex in vivo: Kindling induced potentiation and the enhancement of long-term potentiation by lowfrequency piriform cortex or medial septal stimulation. Hippocampus 7:257-270, 1997. 14. Chapman CA, Perez Y, Lacaille J-C. Effects of GABA A inhibition on the expression of long-term potentiation in CA1 pyramidal cells are dependent on tetanization parameters. Hippocampus 8:289-298, 1998. 15. Chapman CA, Trepel C, Ivanco TL, Froc DJ, Wilson K, Racine RJ. Changes in field potentials and membrane currents in rat sensorimotor cortex following repeated tetanization of the corpus callosum in vivo. Cereb Cortex 8:730-742, 1998. 16. Christie BR, Kerr DS, Abraham WC. Flip side of synaptic plasticity: Long-term depression mechanisms in the hippocampus. Hippocampus 4:127-135, 1994. 17. Daniel H, Levenes C, Crepel F. Cellular mechanisms of cerebellar LTD. TINS 21:401-407, 1998. 18. de Curtis M, Llinás RR. Entorhinal cortex long-term potentiation evoked by thetapatterned stimulation of associative fibers in the isolated in vitro guinea pig brain. Brain Res 600:327-330, 1993.
20 19. Doyère V, Errington ML, Laroche S, Bliss TVP. Low-frequency trains of paired stimuli induce long-term depression in area CA1 but not in dentate gyrus of the intact rat. Hippocampus 6:52-57, 1996. 20. Doyle CA, Cullen WK, Rowan MJ, Anwyl R. Low-frequency stimulation induces homosynaptic depotentiation but not long-term depression of synaptic transmission in the adult anaesthetized and awake rat hippocampus in vivo. Neurosci 77:75-85, 1997. 21. Dudek SM, Bear MF. Homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of hippocampus and effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor blockade. PNAS 89:4363-4367, 1992. 22. Dudek SM, Bear MF. Bidirectional long-term modification of synaptic effectiveness in the adult and immature hippocampus. J Neurosci 13:2910-2918, 1993. 23. Errington ML, Bliss TV, Richter-Levin G, Yenk K, Doyere V, Laroche S. Stimulation at 1-5 Hz does not produce long-term depression or depotentiation in the hippocampus of the adult rat in vivo. J Neurophysiol 74:1793-1799, 1995. 24. Fass GC, Adwanikar H, Gereau RW, Saggau P. Modulation of presynaptic calcium transients by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation: a differential role in acute depression of synaptic transmission and long-term depression. J Neurosci 22:6885-6890, 2002. 25. Finch DM, Tan AM, Isokawa-Akesson M. Feedforward inhibition of the rat entorhinal cortex and subicular complex. J Neurosci 8:2213-2226, 1998. 26. Fitzjohn SM, Palmer MJ, May JE, Neeson A, Morris SA, Collingridge GL. A characterisation of long-term depression induced by metabotropic glutamate receptor activation in the rat hippocampus in vitro. J Physiol (Lond) 537:421-430, 2001.
21 27. Froc DJ, Chapman CA, Trepel C, Racine RJ. Long-term depression and depotentiation in the sensorimotor cortex of the freely moving rat. J Neurosci 20:438-445, 2000. 28. Heynen AJ, Abraham WC, Bear MF. Bidirectional modification of CA1 synapses in the adult hippocampus in vivo. Nature 381:163-166, 1996. 29. Kauderer BS, Kandel ER. Capture of a protein synthesis-dependent component of longterm depression. PNAS 97:13342-13347, 2000. 30. Kemp N, Bashir ZI. Induction of LTD in the adult hippocampus by the synaptic activation of AMPA/kainate and metabotropic glutamate receptors. Neuropharmacol 38:495-504, 1999. 31. Kemp N, Bashir ZI. Long-term depression: a cascade of induction and expression mechanisms. Prog Neurobiol 65:339-365, 2001. 32. Kemp N McQueen J, Faulkes S, Bashir ZI. Different forms of LTD in the CA1 region of the hippocampus: role of age and stimulus protocol. Eur J Neurosci 12:360-366, 2000. 33. Kerr DS, Abraham WC. Cooperative interactions among afferents govern the induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in the hippocampus. PNAS 92:11637-11641, 1995. 34. Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Long-term potentiation - a decade of progress? Science 285:1870-1874, 1999. 35. Manahan-Vaughan D. Priming of group 2 metabotropic glutamate receptors facilitates induction of long-term depression in the dentate gyrus of freely moving rats. Neuropharmacol 37:1459-1464, 1998. 36. Mulkey RM, Malenka RC. Mechanisms underlying induction of homosynaptic long-term depression in area CA1 of the hippocampus. Neuron 9:967-975, 1992.
22 37. Ngezahayo A, Schachner M, Artola A. Synaptic activity modulates the induction of bidirectional synaptic changes in adult mouse hippocampus. J Neurosci 20:2451-2458. 38. Nicoll RA, Oliet SHR, Malenka RC. NMDA receptor-dependent and metabotropic glutamate receptor-dependent forms of long-term depression coexist in CA1 hippocampal pyramidal cells. Neurobiol Learn Mem 70:62-72, 1998. 39. O Dell TJ, Kandel ER. Low-frequency stimulation erases LTP through an NMDA receptor-mediated activation of protein phosphatases. Learning & Memory 1:129-139, 1994. 40. Otani S, Connor JA. Requirement of rapid Ca2+ entry and synaptic activation of metabotropic glutamate receptors for the induction of long-term depression in adult rat hippocampus. J Physiol (Lond) 15:761-770, 1998. 41. Perez Y, Morin F, Lacaille J-C. A Hebbian form of long-term potentiation dependent on mglur1a in hippocampal inhibitory interneurons. PNAS 98:9401-9406, 2001. 42. Racine RJ, Milgram NW, Hafner S. Long-term potentiation phenomena in the rat limbic forebrain. Brain Res 260:217-231, 1983. 43. Sawtell NB, Huber KM, Roder JC, Bear MF. Induction of NMDA receptor-dependent long-term depression in visual cortex does not require metabotropic glutamate receptors. J Neurophysiol 82:3594-3597, 1999. 44. Selig DK, Lee HK, Bear MF, Malenka RC. Reexamination of the effects of MCPG on hippocampal LTP, LTD, and depotentiation. J Neurophysiol 74:1075-1082, 1995. 45. Stanton PK, Sejnowski TJ. Associative long-term depression in the hippocampus induced by Hebbian covariance. Nature 339:215-218, 1989.
23 46. Staubli U, Scafaldi J. Studies on long-term depression in area CA1 of the anesthetized and freely moving rat. J Neurosci 17:4820-4828, 1997. 47. Thiels E, Barrionuevo G, Berger TW. Excitatory stimulation during postsynaptic inhibition induces long-term depression in hippocampus in vivo. J Neurophysiol 72:3009-3016, 1994. 48. Thiels E, Xie X, Yeckel MF, Barrionuevo G, Berger TW. NMDA receptor-dependent LTD in different subfields of hippocampus in vivo and in vitro. Hippocampus 6:43-51, 1996. 49. Wagner JJ, Alger BE. GABAergic and developmental influences on homosynaptic LTD and depotentiation in rat hippocampus. J Neurosci 15:1577-1586, 1995. 50. Watabe AM, Carlisle HJ, O Dell TJ. Postsynaptic induction and presynaptic expression of Group 1 mglur-dependent LTD in the hippocampal CA1 region. J Neurophysiol 87:1395-1403, 2002. 51. Yang X-D, Connor JA, Faber DS. Weak excitation and simultaneous inhibition induce long-term depression in hippocampal CA1 neurons. J Neurophysiol 71:1586-1590, 1994. 52. Yun SH, Mook-Jung I, Jung MW. Variation in effective stimulus patterns for induction of long-term potentiation across different layers of rat entorhinal cortex. J Neurosci 22:RC214(1-5), 2002.
24 FIGURE CAPTIONS Figure 1. Prolonged low-frequency stimulation at 1 or 5 Hz does not cause long-term depression of fepsps in layer II of the entorhinal cortex evoked by layer I stimulation in vitro. A: Field EPSP amplitudes showed a transient depression during the first 5 to 10 min following 1 Hz stimulation (bar, n=11) and then returned to baseline levels. Points indicate the mean ±1 standard error of the mean. The inset traces (1+2) were recorded at the times indicated during the baseline period (1) and following low-frequency stimulation (2). Note the initial fiber volley (arrow) that precedes the fepsp. B: Stimulation at 5 Hz for 3 min (n=6) resulted in a large transient depression that peaked after 5 min. Responses returned to baseline levels within about 30 min. C: Responses were stable in control slices (n=11) that did not receive low-frequency stimulation. Figure 2. Low-frequency (0.5) Hz delivery of 450 pairs of stimulation pulses using a 30 ms interpulse interval induces LTD when synaptic inhibition is reduced with bicuculline. A: In normal ACSF, a transient depression of the fepsp peaked 5 min following the conditioning stimulation, and responses returned to baseline levels within 20 min (n=5). Mean fepsp amplitudes during the conditioning stimulation (bar) indicate the amplitudes of responses to the first stimulation pulse in each pair. B: A comparison of responses recorded in normal ACSF and in the presence of bicuculline (Bic, 50 :M) shows that fepsp amplitude was increased by bocking GABA A receptors (B 1 ). Low-intensity pairedpulse stimulation induces LTD during constant bath application of bicuculline (n=9). Figure 3. Intense patterns of repetitive paired-pulse stimulation induce LTD in the entorhinal cortex. A: Delivery of 900 pairs of pulses at a frequency of 1 Hz caused a reduction of
25 fepsp amplitude to 90.1 ±2.7% of baseline levels after 60 minutes (n=8). B: Increasing the pulse intensity (8:A) during conditioning stimulation increased the amount of LTD that was induced (81.0 ±3.3% of baseline after 60 min; n=9). C: Reducing the number of pairs of pulses, from 900 to 450, also reduced the amount of LTD that was induced (89.1 ±3.8% of baseline after 60 min; n=7). Figure 4. Cumulative probability distributions indicate the range of LTD effects observed following paired-pulse stimulation in individual slices. Data are taken from the same groups as shown in Figure 2 (A) and Figure 3 (B), and are compared to results obtained for control slices (see Figure 1C). Figure 5. Induction of LTD by repetitive paired-pulse stimulation is dependent on activation of NMDA glutamate receptors, but not metabotropic glutamate receptors or GABA A receptors. A: Constant bath application of the NMDA receptor antagonist APV (50 :M; n=8) blocked induction of LTD by intense paired-pulse stimulation (compare with Figure 3B). There was a transient depression that peaked about 2 min after conditioning stimulation, but responses quickly returned to baseline levels. B: Bath application of the group I/II metabotropic glutamate receptor antagonist E4-CPG (500 :M; n=6) did not block induction of LTD, and the amount of LTD induced was similar to that observed in normal ACSF. C: Constant bath application of bicuculline did not prevent the induction of LTD of fepsps by intense paired-pulse stimulation (n=6), indicating that activation of GABA A receptor-mediated inhibition is not required for the induction of LTD.
A fepsp Amplitude (%) B fepsp Amplitude (%) C fepsp Amplitude (%) 120 100 80 1 Hz 1 2 1+2 60-20 0 20 40 60 120 100 80 1 5 Hz 2 1+2 60-20 0 20 40 60 120 100 80 60-20 0 20 40 60 Time (min).5mv 10ms 1 2 1+2
A fepsp Amplitude (%) 120 100 80 60 PP(0.5Hz) 1 2 1+2.2mV 10ms B 1 40-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (min) ACSF Bic ACSF + Bic B 2 fepsp Amplitude (%) 120 100 80 60 PP(0.5Hz) 1 2 1+2.2mV 10ms 40-10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Time (min)
A fepsp Amplitude (%) B fepsp Amplitude (%) C fepsp Amplitude (%) 140 120 100 80 60.2mV 10ms 40-20 0 20 40 60 140 120 100 80 60 140 120 100 80 60 40 PP(1Hz) 1 2 1+2 PP( µα) 1 2 1+2 40-20 0 20 40 60 PP( µα) 1 2 1+2-20 0 20 40 60 Time (min)
A Cumulative Probability B Cumulative Probability 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Control PP (0.5Hz) PP (0.5Hz +Bic) 0.0 40 60 80 100 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 Control PP (1Hz) PP ( µa) PP ( µa, 450) 0.0 40 60 80 100 fepsp Amplitude (%)
A fepsp Amplitude (%) 160 140 120 100 80 60 APV 1+2.2mV 10ms PP( µα) 1 2 B fepsp Amplitude (%) C fepsp Amplitude (%) 40 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 160 140 120 100 80 60 40-10 0 10 20 30 40 E4-CPG 1+2 PP( µα) 1 2-10 0 10 20 30 40 Bicuculline 1+2 PP( µα) 1 2-10 0 10 20 30 40 Time (min)