INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HIV PEDIATRICS - JULY

Similar documents
Raltegravir (RAL) Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Safety in HIV-1 Exposed Neonates at High Risk of Infection: IMPAACT P1110

Impact of tenofovir-containing triple antiretroviral therapy (ART) on bone mineral density in HIV-infected breastfeeding women in sub-saharan Africa

IMPAACT Pregnant Woman by Cuth. Different Pieces of the Puzzle Lynda Stranix-Chibanda for the protocol team 25 September 2018, Cape Town

Second and third line paediatric ART strategies

18 July 2009 The 1st International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics Cape Town, South Africa

Early Antiretroviral Therapy in Newborns: Opportunities and Challenges. Ellen Gould Chadwick MD Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine

Caregiver depression and child neuropsychological outcomes in an observational study of pediatric HIV carried out in four sub-saharan countries

New Directions on WHO ARV Guidelines 2018

Virologic Outcomes of HIV-Infected Children Undergoing a Single-Class Drug Substitution from LPV/r- to EFV-Based cart: A retrospective cohort study.

Cabotegravir Long-Acting (LA) Injectable Nanosuspension Bill Spreen, for ViiV Healthcare & GSK Development Team. 17 th HIV-HEPPK June 2016

VIKING STUDIES Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects

Paediatric HIV Resistance. Mohern Archary Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit King Edward VIII Hospital / University of KwaZulu Natal

What are the most promising opportunities for dose optimisation?

Rifabutin PK and Safety among HIV/TB Coinfected Children Receiving Lopinavir

The next generation of ART regimens

Pharmacologic Characteristics and Delivery Options for Integrase Inhibitors

European Medicines Agency decision

DTG Versus LPV/r in Second Line (DAWNING): Outcomes by WHO- Recommended NRTI Backbone

Pediatric Antiretroviral Therapy

Kimberly Adkison, 1 Lesley Kahl, 1 Elizabeth Blair, 1 Kostas Angelis, 2 Herta Crauwels, 3 Maria Nascimento, 1 Michael Aboud 1

Criteria for Oral PrEP

HIV Treatment Update. Awewura Kwara, MD, MPH&TM Associate Professor of Medicine and Infectious Diseases Brown University

Oral Versus Injectable Delivery, Impact on Adherence/Tolerability

PAEDIATRIC TB TRIAL UPDATE

Clinical Pharmacology and Formulation Challenges of Pediatric Antiretroviral Treatment

Pediatric ARV Working Group Dosing Recommendations

Paediatric HIV Drug Resistance 26th-International-Workshop-on-HIV-Drug-Resistance-programme [2].tiff

Adherence to ART in HIV-infected children in Kenya, South Africa, and Thailand

3rd IAS Conference on HIV Pathogenesis and Treatment. Poster Number Abstract #

TRANSITION TO NEW ANTIRETROVIRALS IN HIV PROGRAMMES

Pediatric Antiretroviral Resistance Challenges

10th International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics, Amsterdam, 20-21st July 2018

PAEDIATRIC HIV INFECTION. Dr Ashendri Pillay Paediatric Infectious Diseases Specialist

CROI 2017 Highlights What s New in Antiretrovirals (Part 2)

Pediatric HIV Update NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5316

Roger Shapiro, MD, MPH Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health Botswana-Harvard Partnership May 2018

What's new in the WHO ART guidelines How did markets react?

Antiretroviral Dosing in Renal Impairment

The availability and cost are obstacles to using pvl in monitoring HIV treatment outcomes in resource-constrained settings

Treatment experience in South Africa. Dr Ian Sanne Clinical HIV Research Unit University of the Witwatersrand

Existing and most needed paediatric ARV formulations

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

Introduction. Protease Inhibitor based ART in children is used:

Updates on Revised Antiretroviral Treatment Guidelines Overview 27 March 2013

ART and Prevention: What do we know?

1. Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies 2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 3. University College London

Public Assessment Report. EU worksharing project paediatric data. Valcyte. Valganciclovir

Maternal, Adolescent, and Pediatric HIV/AIDS Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network:

Principles of Antiretroviral Therapy

ACCESS TO MEDICINES. Update on tuberculosis field activities

Ivy Song, 1 Kimberly Adkison, 2 Mark Lovern 3, Joannellyn Chiu 3, Jenny Huang 1, Cindy Vavro 1, Mounir Ait-Khaled 1, Brian Wynne 1 and Sherene Min 1

Antiretroviral treatment outcomes after the introduction of tenofovir in the public-sector in South Africa

Rationalization of the Pediatric Antiretroviral Formulary to Optimize Pediatric Antiretroviral Treatment in Malawi

List of Optimal Paediatric Formulations. Marianne Gauval (CHAI) IAS-ILF Round table Geneva, Switzerland 26 November 2013

Efavirenz vs dolutegravir for 1st line ART: Is it time to change? The argument AGAINST. Graeme Meintjes University of Cape Town

Clinical Study Synopsis for Public Disclosure

All HIV+ Women on Antiretroviral Therapy Should Breastfeed in Both Low and High Resource Settings VOTE NO!!

Efficacy, Safety, and Adherence of TDF/3TC/EFV Once Daily in Virologic-suppressed HIV-infected Children following Switching from NNRTI-based Regimens


Cryptococcosis of the Central Nervous System: Classical and Immune-Reconstitution Disease

Dolutegravir Attributes

PRO140 SC Monotherapy (MT) Provides Long-Term, Full Virologic Suppression in HIV Patients

Infertility Treatment and HIV

Can we make first line ART better?

CROI 2017 Review: Novel ART Strategies

Prospective study of Lopinavir based ART for HIV Infected ChildreN Globally (LIVING study): Interim 48-week effectiveness and safety results.

Injectable Antiretrovirals The Promise and the Peril. Ian McGowan MD PhD FRCP University of Pittsburgh, PA, USA Cape Town, 6 th October, 2015

2nd line failure, provincial evaluation process for 3rd line therapy, 3rd line treatment options James Nuttall

Welcome and State of the Network. Cape Town, South Africa 27 th September 2016

Real Life Experience of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Dual Therapy As a Switching Regimen in HIVTR Cohort

Update on PrEP progress: WHO/UNAIDS challenges and actions

The CQUIN Learning Network

Deborah Kacanek, Konstantia Angelidou, Paige L. Williams, Miriam Chernoff, Kenneth Gadow, Sharon Nachman, The IMPAACT P1055 Study Team

Acquired HIV Drug Resistance in children in Asia

Where are we going after effectiveness studies?

Simplifying HIV Treatment Now and in the Future

The study listed may include approved and non-approved uses, formulations or treatment regimens. The results reported in any single study may not

Pharmacological considerations on the use of ARVs in pregnancy

MANAGING HIV IN CHILDREN: BEST PRACTICES

VIKING STUDIES. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir. treatment-experienced subjects

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

Historic Perspective on HIV and TB Research in Pregnant Women

PRIORITIES FOR HIV/AIDS PROCUREMENT AND PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT

A case, and some pharmacological considerations. from the perspective of a virologist. Anna Maria Geretti University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Understanding the Results of VOICE

Management of patients with antiretroviral treatment failure: guidelines comparison

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

HPTN 052. Myron S. Cohen, MD Principal Investigator. Presented at the 6 th Int. Workshop on HIV Transmission, July 2011, Rome, Italy

Long-Acting Antiretrovirals for HIV

IATT Optimal List of Paediatric ARV Formulations: Background and Update

2016 Perinatal Treatment Guidelines Update

Clinical Study Report AI Final 28 Feb Volume: Page:

Introduction. Cahn et al. Andean Pacific HIV Clinical Forum 2017; Santiago, Chile. Abstract 2.

Median (Min Max) CVC 100 mg + EFV placebo + TDF/FTC (N=8) CVC 200 mg + EFV placebo + TDF/FTC (N=10) LLOQ=5.00 ng/ml Time (h)

Application for Inclusion of Lopinavir /Ritonavir Oral Granules (LPV/r) Formulation on WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children

CROI 2013: New Drugs for Treatment and PrEP

Optimizing 2 nd and 3 rd Line Antiretroviral Therapy in Children and Adolescents

Original article Therapeutic levels of lopinavir in late pregnancy and abacavir passage into breast milk in the Mma Bana Study, Botswana

Analysis of the pre-art cascade among HIV-infected children aged 0-19 years in the IeDEA global network,

Transcription:

PHARMACOKINETIC AND 4-WEEK SAFETY/EFFICACY OF DOLUTEGRAVIR (S/GSK1349572) DISPERSIBLE TABLETS IN HIV-INFECTED CHILDREN AGED 4 WEEKS TO <6 YEARS: RESULTS FROM IMPAACT P1093 Theodore Ruel, Edward P. Acosta, Rajendra Singh, Carmelita Alvero, Terry Fenton, Kathleen George, Ellen Townley, Rohan Hazra, Stephanie Popson, Ann M. Buchanan, Cindy Brothers, Cindy Vavro, Andrew Wiznia, and the IMPAACT P1093 Team INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON HIV PEDIATRICS - JULY 20, 2018

BACKGROUND Dolutegravir (DTG) is a promising agent for children with HIV given its potency, high barrier to resistance, and tolerability. IMPAACT P1093 is an ongoing phase 1/2 open-label pharmacokinetic (PK), safety, and dose-finding regulatory study of DTG in children Film-coated tablets approved for older children in the USA and EU. Dispersible tablets (DTG-DT) of 5mg developed for younger children and infants Here we present the intensive PK and 4-week safety (primary outcomes), as well tolerability and efficacy data for DTG-DT in children ages 4 weeks to < 6 years

P1093 DESIGN DOSE DETERMINATION BY AGE COHORTS Mini Cohort n=4 Intensive PK plus 4-week safety and tolerability data for dose selection Full Cohort - Stage 1 n=6 more enrolled to achieve 10 total Full Cohort - Stage II n= 12 more enrolled to achieve 22 total Intensive PK sampling and 4-week safety/efficacy Sparse PK sampling and 48-week safety/efficacy Cohort I: Cohort IIA: Cohort IIB: Cohort III - DT: Cohort IV - DT: Cohort V - DT: Adolescents 12 to <18 years of age (Tablet formulation) Children 6 to <12 years of age (Tablet formulation) Children 6 to <12 years of age (Granules) Children 2 to <6 years of age (Dispersible Tablet) Children 6 months to <2 years (Dispersible Tablet) Infants 4 weeks to <6 months (Dispersible Tablet)

METHODS ENROLLMENT* Inclusion Criteria: Within age range of cohort at time of entry Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Status: ART-experienced and failing or off ART for 4 weeks ART-naïve or have started ART < 4 weeks prior to entry (if < 2 years old) HIV RNA > 1,000 copies/ml Exclusion Criteria: Current or recent (< 4 weeks) co-morbidity or laboratory abnormality Weight < 3 kg Maternal or participant exposure to integrase inhibitor No receipt of Nevirapine in14 days prior to enrollment (as PMTCT or treatment) * Per Version 4.0 of the protocol

METHODS STAGE I PK AND MONITORING Enrollment Day 5 Day 10 4 weeks History and examination Safety Laboratory testing (blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes) HIV RNA level Intensive PK Sampling Pre-, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 and 24 hours after witnessed dose in fasted state* History and examination Safety Laboratory testing (blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes) HIV RNA level History and examination Safety Laboratory testing (blood count, electrolytes, liver enzymes) HIV RNA level * Instructed to not ingest breastmilk, formula or other high fat food/liquid 2 hours prior and 1 hour after dosing.

PARTICIPANT CHARACTERISTICS Cohort V-DT ( 4 wk to <6 mo) Cohort IV-DT ( 6 mo to <2 yr) Cohort III-DT ( 2 yr to <6 yr) Total (N=10) (N=10) (N=10) (N=30)* Sex Female 4 6 3 13 (43%) Baseline Plasma HIV RNA (copies/ml) 400 to < 5,000 3 1 2 6 (20%) 5,000 to <10,000 1 1 1 3 (10%) 10,000 to <25,000 0 1 1 2 (7%) 25,000 to <50,000 0 2 1 3 (10%) 50,000 6 5 5 16 (53%) Baseline CD4 Cell Count (cells/mm 3 ) 500 10 10 10 30 (100%) Baseline CD4 Percent 14 0 1 2 3 (10%) >14 to <25 5 5 1 11 (37%) 25 5 4 7 16 (53%) Number (%) of participants in each subcategory; * 32 enrolled to achieve 30 evaluable. Countries Botswana 3 (10%) Brazil 1 (3%) South Africa 7 (23%) Tanzania 3 10%) Thailand 2 (7%) USA 2 (7%) Zimbabwe 12 (40%

INITIAL DTG-DT DOSING TABLE Weight Band (kg) Dose* (mg) Dose (mg/kg) for Weight Range Lower Weight Upper Weight 3 to < 6 5 1.67 0.83 6 to <10 10 1.67 1.00 10 to <14 15 1.50 1.07 14 to <20 15 1.79 1.25 20 to <25 20 1.50 1.20 * Once daily

INTENSIVE PK RESULTS FOR DTG-DT Cohort (n=10 each) ~ 4 weeks to <6 months (Cohort V) 6 months to <2 years (Cohort IV) 2 years to <6 years (Cohort III) Age (yrs)^ Dose (mg/kg)^ AUC 24h * (mg x h/l) C 24h * (ng/ml) 0.34 (0.28-0.39) 1.2 (0.9-1.7) 61 (44%) 1,207 (55%) 1.2 (0.9-1.9) 1.2 (1.0-1.4) 51 (38%) 711 (60%) 4.0 (2.1-5.9) 1.1 (0.8-1.6) 40 (36%) 461 (59%) ^ Median (range); * Geometric mean (arithmetic coefficient of variation %) of 24 hour area under the curve (AUC 24h ) and trough (C 24h ). Version 4.0 Target (range) for Geometric Mean: AUC 24h : 46 (37-86) mg x h/l C 24h : 750 (500-2260) ng/ml Note: Dispersible Tablets (DT) are 5mg each.

DTG DT : 24 HOUR TROUGH BY COHORT Version 4.0 Target (range) for Geometric Mean: C 24h : 750 (500-2260) ng/ml ( 4 wk to <6 mo) ( 6 mo to <2 yr) ( 2 yr to <6 yr) Below target range (<500 ng/ml)

4 WEEK SAFETY GRADE 3/4 ADVERSE EVENTS No Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) attributed to study drug No study drug discontinuations Cohort AE Grade ~ Week Description Outcome/explanation V-DT 3 1 Low Phosphate Grade 2 at baseline, then resolved IV-DT* 3 1 Low Bicarbonate Grade 3 at baseline IV-DT* 4 4 Low Absolute Neutrophil Count 253 c/mm 3 but normal 2 days later III-DT 3 1 Elevated Systolic Blood Pressure Hypertension noted at baseline, providers suggested anxiety III-DT 3 1 Low Bicarbonate Grade 2 at baseline ~ DAIDS AE Grading Table, Version 1.0, December 2004, Clarification August 2009 * Same participant

FEASIBILITY, ACCEPTABILITY AND TOLERABILITY OF DTG DT Cohort (N=10 participants in each cohort) Problems with swirling, dispersing or drawing up? Overall Taste Assessment? Problems taking? 4 wk to <6 mo (V) n=28 assessments Never: 28 Infrequent/ sometimes : 0 Very good: 9 Fair/Pleasant: 18 Acceptable: 2 Very bad: 0 No: 28 Yes: 0 6 mo to <2 yr (IV) n=32 assessments Never: 29 Infrequent/ sometimes : 3 Very good: 7 Fair/Pleasant: 15 Acceptable: 8 Very bad: 2 No: 28 Yes: 4 2 yr to <6 yr (III) n= 35 assessments Never: 34 Infrequent/ sometimes : 1 Very good: 14 Good: 13 Average: 2 Very bad: 5 No: 33 Yes: 2 * Dispersible tablets were well-tolerated across all ages

4 WEEK VIROLOGICAL OUTCOMES At 4 weeks, 24/30 (80%) attained HIV-1 RNA of <400 copies/ml or a >2 log 10 decrease Background Regimens* ZDV/3TC 15 ABC/3TC 4 LPV/r + ZDV/3TC 6 LPV/r + ABC/3TC 3 LPV/r + D4T/3TC 1 LPV/r + 3TC 1 LPV/r + TDF 1 * Optimized to ensure genotypedocumented active agent Diamond is mean, box is quartiles, whiskers are 1.5x interquartile range.

KEY PK FINDINGS AND NEXT STEPS DTG DT FOR AGES 4 WEEKS TO 6 YEARS This dosing of DTG-DT resulted in geometric mean AUC 24h and C 24h generally within target ranges However children 6 mos to < 6 yrs of age demonstrated moderate inter-subject variability and some low individual C 24h Higher doses now under study for those ages Next protocol version allows for additional enrollments to ensure data adequate for WHO weight-band and age-based dosing

CURRENT DTG-DT DOSING TABLE: P1093 Age Weight Band (kg) Dose (mg) Dose Range (mg/kg) low weight high weight 4 weeks to < 6 months of age 3 to < 6 5 1.67 0.83 6 to < 10 10 2.50 1.50 3 to < 6 10 3.33 1.67 6 to < 10 15 2.50 1.50 6 months of age 10 to < 14 20 2.00 1.43 14 to < 20 25 1.79 1.25 20 30 1.50 * Due to greater bioavailability, the 30mg dispersible tablet is approximately equivalent to the 50mg film-coated tablets.

CONCLUSIONS: DTG DT FOR AGES 4 WEEKS TO 6 YEARS IN P1093 Drug Exposures similar to adults can be achieved with the dispersible tablet formulation of dolutegravir in children aged 4 weeks to 6 years. The dispersible tablet formulation was well tolerated and easily administered by participants and their families Week 4 virologic outcomes suggest that DTG-DT plus standard background regimens will provide safe and potent treatment for children with HIV

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS P1093 Protocol Team NICHD/NIAID ViiV / GSK Sites and their staff P1093 participants and their caregivers! Overall support for the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network (IMPAACT) was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) with co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH), all components of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), under Award Numbers UM1AI068632 (IMPAACT LOC), UM1AI068616 (IMPAACT SDMC) and UM1AI106716 (IMPAACT LC), and by NICHD contract number HHSN275201800001I. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.