Formulation of a Focused Clinical Question Using PICO University of Mary Department of Physical Therapy Michael G. Parker, PhD, PT, FACSM, Professor

Similar documents
Dr. Sonia Oveisi Assistant Professor of Qazvin University of Medical Science RESOURCES FOR EBM 6/2/2014 1

A Cochrane systematic review of interventions to improve hearing aid use

RESEARCH PROJECT. Comparison of searching tools and outcomes of different providers of the Medline database (OVID and PubMed).

Abstract: Learning Objectives: Posttest:

GRADE. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation. British Association of Dermatologists April 2018

Disclosure 1/21/2019. Ask A Librarian: Searching PTNow C L A S S. Gini Blodgett Birchett, MSLS Lead information resources specialist, APTA

EVIDENCE-BASED HEALTH CARE

What s News ( My opinion )??? And how good are we??? Single anatomical drill holes. Disclosures. Introduction. My Preferred Technique

Evidence based practice. Dr. Rehab Gwada

Meta-Analysis Methods used in Radiology Journals

Searching Effectively and Efficiently for Accurate Answers to Clinical Questions

Practice parameter: immunotherapy for Guillain-Barre syndrome: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

EQUATOR Network: promises and results of reporting guidelines

MINDFULNESS-BASED INTERVENTIONS IN EPILEPSY

Grading the Evidence Developing the Typhoid Statement. Manitoba 10 th Annual Travel Conference April 26, 2012

Implementation of Evidence Based Medicine in Clinical Teaching and Practices

Thesis Project for graduation with a Doctorate in Physical Therapy: CASE STUDY

Correlated to: ACT College Readiness Standards Science (High School)

DIPLOMA IN SPECIAL CARE DENTISTRY

Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine: Finding and Assessing the Evidence

Asking answerable clinical questions

Quick Literature Searches

Evidence Based Medicine

Downloaded from:

Intro to Evidence Based Medicine

Workshop: Cochrane Rehabilitation 05th May Trusted evidence. Informed decisions. Better health.

PubMed Tutorial Author: Gökhan Alpaslan DMD,Ph.D. e-vident

Running Head: INCENTIVE SPIROMETRY VERSUS DEEP BREATHING 1

SUPPLEMENTARY DATA. Supplementary Figure S1. Search terms*

2017 OPTIONS FOR INDIVIDUAL MEASURES: REGISTRY ONLY. MEASURE TYPE: Outcome

Time for quality of manual physical therapy Where do we stand now and are we moving in the right direction?

Section Processing

Finding the Evidence: a review. Kerry O Rourke & Cathy Weglarz UMDNJ-RWJ Library of the Health Sciences

Evidence-Based Review Process to Link Dietary Factors with Chronic Disease Case Study: Cardiovascular Disease and n- 3 Fatty Acids

Systematic reviews: From evidence to recommendation. Marcel Dijkers, PhD, FACRM Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

A TR 324 SYLLABUS. Therapeutic Modalities for Athletic Trainers

Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies (MOOSE): Checklist.

Evidence Based Medicine

Registration. Is your registration form accessible? Series: Designing accessible events for people with disabilities and Deaf people

SkillBuilder Shortcut: Levels of Evidence

PROSPERO International prospective register of systematic reviews

Copyright GRADE ING THE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE AND STRENGTH OF RECOMMENDATIONS NANCY SANTESSO, RD, PHD

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis

Exam Sec. I A The College Board. Visit the College Board on the Web:

Standards for reporting Plain Language Summaries (PLS) for Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Reviews (interim guidance adapted from Methodological

EVIDENCE-BASED MANAGEMENT OF ACL INJURIES: REHABILITATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTORS, AND RETURN TO SPORT DECISION-MAKING. Dates 1-2 December 2018

Thinking Ahead. Advance Care Planning for People with Developmental Disabilities

Requirements for Recertification Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Physical Therapy

Enhancing Retrieval of Best Evidence for Health Care from Bibliographic Databases: Calibration of the Hand Search of the Literature

Systematic reviews of prediction modeling studies: planning, critical appraisal and data collection

USDA Nutrition Evidence Library: Systematic Review Methodology

PART 1: EVIDENCE REVIEW. Population/ Intervention / Comparison / Outcome (PICO)

Department of: Health and Leisure New X Course No.: RC304 Fall 1998 Title of Course: Therapeutic Recreation: Program Design

Research Proposal Equal Educational Rights for Autistic Students

In the adult population, does the Spurlings sign/test have good sensitivity* and specificity** in detecting cervical radiculopthy?

Comparative Effectiveness Research Collaborative Initiative (CER-CI) PART 1: INTERPRETING OUTCOMES RESEARCH STUDIES FOR HEALTH CARE DECISION MAKERS

Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines

North Carolina Board of Physical Therapy Examiners Application for Physical Therapist Licensure

What Are the Issues in Applying Systematic Evidence-Based Review Approaches to DRI Development?

PERSONALIZED GENETIC REPORT CLIENT-REPORTED DATA PURPOSE OF THE X-SCREEN TEST

Dr. Engle has received an unrestricted educational grant for the MD Anderson Pain Medicine Fellowship.

Introduction to the DSM-5 for APRNs. Presenters. Disclosures. Continuing Education Subcommittee APNA Education Council. Co-Chairs of CE subcommittee:

Title registration for a systematic review: Book reading for promoting physical and mental health in older adults

Meta-analysis of diagnostic research. Karen R Steingart, MD, MPH Chennai, 15 December Overview

The Cochrane Collaboration, the US Cochrane Center, and The Cochrane Library

Systematic Review & Course outline. Lecture (20%) Class discussion & tutorial (30%)

4/11/2015. Use of Standardized Outcome Measures. Picking Measures and Goals in Musculoskeletal Disorders

(The CHBG) Dimitrinka Nikolova, Managing Editor, Editorial Team Office, The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group

OSU Pre-PT Club. Northern Therapy and Rehabilitation. Physical Therapy. Ken Schaecher, DPT, OCS.

Economic evaluation of health promotion activities for older people conceptual questions

Probiotics for Prevention and Treatment of Respiratory Tract Infections in Children

Platelet Rich Plasma: Hoax or Hope

Combination therapy compared to monotherapy for moderate to severe Alzheimer's Disease. Summary

Stats: Modeling the World. Chapter 12: Experimental Design

Generic risk statements regarding ionising radiation for MPE and CRE statements in the IRAS application form and Participant Information Sheets

BACKGROUND ASK THE QUESTION

Toward a comprehensive evidence map of overview of systematic review methods: paper 1 purpose, eligibility, search and data extraction

CRITICAL APPRAISAL WORKSHEET 1

The Cochrane Skin Group - Core Outcome Set Initiative to develop core outcome sets across the whole of dermatology

Administrative - Master Syllabus COVER SHEET

With the rise of evidence-based practice, the use of systematic reviews (SRs) has

Evidence-based practice

PrEPX frequently asked questions version 1

AT 370W Therapeutic Exercise of Athletic Injuries Fall 2013

3. Understand and explain the role of ASL in maintenance and preservation of Deaf culture/community.

Sultan Qaboos University Hospital Medicines Information Course. Assessment

Clinical teaching/experi ence. Lectures/semina rs/conferences Self-directed. learning. Clinical teaching/experi ence

DENTRIX ENTERPRISE 8.0.5

PHO MetaQAT Guide. Critical appraisal in public health. PHO Meta-tool for quality appraisal

Webinar 3 Systematic Literature Review: What you Need to Know

Economic evaluation of antibacterials in the treatment of acute sinusitis Laurier C, Lachaine J, Ducharme M

EBM Journal Club: Does Ginkgo Biloba improve memory in elder group

pc oral surgery international

Research Questions and Survey Development

Setting The setting was primary and secondary care. The economic study was carried out in the UK.

Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)

Postprofessional Occupational Therapy Doctorate. Core Curriculum. EFFECTIVE: July Revised Jan 2018

Complete Summary GUIDELINE TITLE

University of Salford

Transcription:

Formulation of a Focused Clinical Question Using PICO University of Mary Department of Physical Therapy Michael G. Parker, PhD, PT, FACSM, Professor How do Clinical Questions Happen? Clinical questions occur during the management of a patient or during the description of a patient s care (Case Report). During patient management, you may require more information before making a clinical decision. Similarly, you may require more information about the validity of a test or the effectiveness of an intervention you are describing within the context of a Case Report. Whether you are developing a question for making a direct clinical decision or for a Case Report, your question will likely arise from one of the following evidence based practice domains shown in Table 1. Table 1. Domains of evidence-based practice and the type of evidence to look for questions within each respective area Domain Meaning of Domain Type of Evidence Diagnosis signs, symptoms, or tests diagnosing condition Diagnostic validation study Intervention/treatment Selection of effective Randomized Prognosis Causation/Etiology treatments The possible course of the impairments/functional limitations over time causes of pathology, impairments, functional limitations, and disability and how these develop Once you have determined the domain, you are ready to formulate an answerable good clinical question. How to Formulate an Answerable Clinical Question control trials Prospective cohort study Case-control or cohort study A well formulated clinical question consists of the 4 elements defined in Table 2. Those elements are Patient Population or Problem, Intervention, Comparison (if needed), and Outcome. Consequently, these elements are important because they become the key factors defining the limits of your search for the answer. For instance, in addition to the Intervention, Compare, and Outcome elements, data bases like MEDLINE/PubMed use such elements as age, gender, medical condition (Patient and Problem) to limit the electronic search of the data base. The acronym used to describe the formulation of a

question using these 4 elements is PICO (P= Patient, I= Intervention, C= Comparison, & O= Outcome). The following clinical questions are presented Table 2. The PICO method for creating an answerable clinical question Patient population or Problem What group (population) or problem do you want information about? Intervention or Exposure What physical therapy event do you need to study the the effect of or determine the validity and/or reliability of? Comparison What is the evidence that the intervention produces better results than no intervention or another kind of treatment? What is the evidence that the clinical test is as or more valid than other tests? Outcomes What is the effect of the intervention? The accuracy of a diagnostic test? as an example of the PICO method in the patient management domains of Diagnosis and Intervention. Application of the PICO Method to Formulate a Clinical Question The patient is an otherwise healthy 35 year old male with acute low back pain. You use the McKenzie symptoms of centralization and peripheralization to determine if the source of his back pain is discogenic, and question if the McKenzie method is a valid test for diagnosing disc pathology. The question will be formulated in the diagnosis domain of patient management. Your first step is to identify the 4 elements of a good clinical question. See Table 3. Table 3. Elements of the clinical question in the Diagnosis Domain of patient management Patient population or Problem otherwise healthy 35 year old male with acute low back pain Intervention or Exposure the clinical McKenzie exam (centralization and peripheralization) Comparison compare to standard imaging Outcomes diagnosing disc pathology The next step is to use the elements identified in Table 3, to write the following answerable clinical research question:

In an otherwise healthy 35 year old male with acute low back pain, how does the clinical McKenzie exam compare to standard imaging in diagnosing disc pathology? Thus, the answer to this question will assist the clinician with the decision of whether or not to use the McKenzie exam to diagnose the presence of disc pathology. Questions can also be developed to assist the clinician with decisions pertaining to the choice of interventions. The next clinical question was developed for a question relevant to the Intervention domain of patient management. The patient is a 23 year old female who is 3 months post ACL reconstruction. You are planning to use closed chain functional training for the lower extremity and question the effectiveness of this functional training program compared to a more traditional progressive resistive exercise program. Your first step is to identify the 4 elements of a good clinical question. See Table 4. Table 4. Elements of the clinical question in the Intervention Domain of patient management Patient population or Problem Otherwise healthy 23 year old female 3 months Post ACL reconstruction Intervention or Exposure closed chain functional training of the lower extremity Comparison compare to a more traditional progressive resistive exercise program Outcomes Incidence of re-injury and/or postoperative complications The next step is to use the elements identified in Table 4, to write the following answerable clinical research question: In an otherwise healthy 23 year old female who is 3 months post-acl reconstruction, how does closed chain functional training of the lower extremity affect the incidence of re-injury and post-operative complications when compared to a more traditional progressive resistive exercise program? Finding the Evidence: Searching the Data Bases After formulation of your PICO question, you can begin searching the data bases for the answers. It is recommended that you perform your search systematically; starting with the systematic review data bases like Cochrane, and if your answer is not found, searching data bases with primary sources like ProQuest/Open Door etc.

A new service provide by Medline permits you to search the Medline database using the PICO method; this new service is called AskMedline and you can find it at the following Web address: http://askmedline.nlm.nih.gov/ask/pico.php This site prompts you for Patient, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome information prior to performing the search. In addition, you can limit the level of evidence produced, e.g., meta-analysis vs. randomized controlled trial etc below is an example of the screen prior to the search: The following page shows the result of this search:

From this screen, you can see that both articles are available full text, but may not be directly available on this data base without paying a fee. You should note that this search was done on a University of Mary computer network. Another search was performed on the effectiveness of McKenzie exercises, see next screen. You will note that I expanded the search by not specifying gender, age, comparison, or outcomes. As future searches are performed, the search could be narrowed by using more limiters.

The results of this search which specified a meta-analysis, produced the following paper. Unfortunately, full text versions of these articles may not be directly available without a charge.