New Class of Appliance

Similar documents
The Tip-Edge appliance and

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

Checklist with summary points

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

Class I. Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment for Arch Development. Clinician: Dr. Stuart Frost, Phoenix, AZ Patient: A.M.

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

Anterior Open Bite Correction with Invisalign Anterior Extrusion and Posterior Intrusion.

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD

Attachment G. Orthodontic Criteria Index Form Comprehensive D8080. ABBREVIATIONS CRITERIA for Permanent Dentition YES NO

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

Arch Development: Clear Fixed Appliance vs. Aligner Treatment

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Virtual Treatment Planning

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

ortho case report Sagittal First international magazine of orthodontics By Dr. Luis Carrière Special Reprint

The management of impacted

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

REPRINTED FROM JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ORTHODONTICS 1828 PEARL STREET, BOULDER, COLORADO Dr. Nanda Dr. Marzban Dr. Kuhlberg

#45 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTIVE ERUPTION GUIDANCE -- PREVENTIVE OCCLUSAL DEVELOPMENT

AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC BOARD

You. Fix. Could. This? Treatment solutions for typical and atypical adult relapse. 78 SEPTEMBER 2017 // orthotown.com

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Orthos Article Revisited: Practice Efficiency & Profitability

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

THE MBT VERSATILE+ APPLIANCE SYSTEM

A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY

S.H. Age: 15 Years 3 Months Diagnosis: Class I Nonextraction Severe crowding, very flat profile. Background:

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

Nonsurgical Treatment of Adult Open Bite Using Edgewise Appliance Combined with High-Pull Headgear and Class III Elastics

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Skeletal Class III patients can be some of the CASE STUDY. By Jeffery Gerhardt, DDS. Acceptable Results Likely. Poor Results Likely. Fig.

TURN CLASS II INTO SIMPLE CLASS I PATIENTS.

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

TWO PHASE FOR A BETTER FACE!! TWIN BLOCK AND HEADGEAR FOLLOWED BY FIXED THERAPY FOR CLASS II CORRECTION

Class III malocclusion occurs in less than 5%

3D CONTROL HAS ARRIVED

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

With judicious treatment planning, the clinical

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Delta Force. Bracket System. Putting you in the driver s seat for ultimate control

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS CROWDING

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

THE USE OF VACCUM FORM RETAINERS FOR RELAPSE CORRECTION

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

rocky mountain orthodontics functionaleducation

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Advantages. Fantastic. systems. Together with Unitek Lateral Development Archwires, this system puts you in control to

Advantages. Fantastic. Treatment. Finishes. 3M Self-Ligating Appliances Lateral Development System. Unitek Lateral Development Archwires

Clear Aligners. As clear aligners have become very popular among teens. in Phase 1 Treatment

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Canine Extrusion Technique with SmartClip Self-Ligating Brackets

Managing. Not on course. Unplanned reaction 9/15/2011. Possible Reactions. Probable Root causes. invisalign Aligner Tracking Issues

Clinical Consideration Series. Dedicated to help you treat with confidence. Crowding.

Honing Damon System Mechanics for the Ultimate in Efficiency and Excellence Jeff Kozlowski, DDS East Lyme, CT

The conservative treatment of Class I malocclusion with maxillary transverse deficiency and anterior teeth crowding

SURGICAL - ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT OF CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION IN AN ADULT PATIENT: A CASE REPORT

Treatment technique: A clinical & Practical sequences in the Management of Angle Class II Malocclusion (Maxillary Protrusion)

We Give Back. Reduce Emergency Visits! ATTACHMENTS. No More Poking Archwires! Crimpable Mini Stops. Tooth Tone Crimpable Mini Stops

Unilateral Horizontally Impacted Maxillary Canine and First Premolar Treated with a Double Archwire Technique

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

RETENTION AND RELAPSE

3M Incognito Appliance System extraction case study.

Corporate Medical Policy

An Effectiv Rapid Molar Derotation: Keles K

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Clinical efficacy of Invisalign treatment with weekly aligner changes: Two case reports

#27 Ortho-Tain, Inc PREVENTING MALOCCLUSIONS IN THE 5 TO 7 YEAR OLD - CROWDING, ROTATIONS, OVERBITE, AND OVERJET

Efficient Bonding Protocol for the Insignia Custom Bracket System

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

Transcription:

A New Class of Appliance THE HARNICK SECTIONAL DISTALIZER 42 APRIL 2017 // orthotown.com

A seasoned ortho s creation for treating Class 2 patients by David Harnick, DDS Introduction The correction of Class 2 malocclusions is a routine part of orthodontic practice. There are many systems that are used, including headgear, Class 2 elastics, functional appliances and noncompliance repositioning appliances in conjunction with complete fixed appliances. Yet, even with so many options, the complete correction of Class 2 malocclusions is difficult and elusive. The American Board of Orthodontics has an objective grading system, and incomplete correction of Class 2 buccal segments is listed as one of the major reasons for failure. These cases generally represent the best attempts by the clinician and may not be what is typically achieved in the routine practice of orthodontics. I have noticed in some of my cases that while attempting to completely correct the Class 2, there can be a lack of complete seating of the maxillary buccal cusps in the lower embrasures. In transfer cases, I ve observed the same common problem. The orthodontic literature is replete with Class 2 correction mechanics. Distalizing jigs in conjunction with Class 2 elastics has been used in techniques like bioprogressive for years. Recently, the Carriere Distalizer was introduced for the correction of Class 2 malocclusions. David Harnick, DDS, MD, is a diplomate of the American Board of Orthodontics, and master in the Academy of General Dentistry. It is unique in that there is no cross arch stabilization when applying Class 2 elastic force to the appliance. It has been shown to be effective in the correction of Class 2 malocclusions prior to the application of the fixed appliances. The Harnick Sectional Distalizer concept is useful with all fixed appliances without any modification to prescription or archwire slot. However, this concept does require patient cooperation in the wearing of Class 2 elastics. It does not replace the noncompliance appliances. Technique For best results, it is recommended that traditional archwire sequencing progress to 19x25ss archwires in a.022 slot. Prescription of the appliance has no effect on the HSD. A maxillary posted archwire is then sectioned mesial to the canines leaving the post as hook for the Class 2 elastic. If a posted wire is not available, a simple bend of the archwire suffices. (Fig. 1) Fig. 1 Typical response to HSD. Note the archwire is segmented mesial to the canine and the post becomes the Class 2 elastic hook. Another choice is to simply bend a loop for the elastic. orthotown.com \\ APRIL 2017 43

Fig. 4 One year progress. Archwires were 19x25ss. The first attempt of an HSD. The archwire was sectioned and tied back. Fig. 2 Transfer in photographs. Note dumped arches, rotations, marginal ridges discrepancies, Cl3 canine left, midlines, poor bracket placement and a deep bite. Fig. 3 Transfer in pano. Note blocked out LR5 and ledge distal to LLE. Fig. 5 One week of HSD showing progress of Class 2 correction. To have the best patient cooperation possible, it is important to educate the patient. The patient is shown what a Class 1 canine relationship is. It s also important to remind the patient that if the elastic is not worn, the teeth will not move into the correct positions. The anterior section is usually replaced with a round wire from lateral to lateral. It is important to ligate the anterior teeth to prevent spacing. There will be significant spacing if this step is omitted. Quarter-inch medium (4.5 ounce) elastics are started and can be switched to quarter-inch heavy (6 ounce) if necessary. It can be used unilaterally if necessary. To have the best patient cooperation possible, it is important to educate the patient. The patient is shown what a Class 1 canine relationship is. It s also important to remind the patient that if the elastic is not worn, the teeth will not move into the correct positions. Then ask the patient at 44 APRIL 2017 // orthotown.com

Fig. 8 Result. Fig. 6 After five weeks of HSD. Fig. 9. Three-year post-treatment photos. Note slight return of Class 2 on the right side. This was due to insufficient treatment time with HSD. Fig. 7 Final records after 16 months of treatment after transfer. A nice solution to a difficult problem. each appointment, Are you Class 1? By engaging the patient in this manner, there can be excellent cooperation and results. Initially, the HSD concept was utilized for only final correction of the buccal segments after other Class 2 mechanics. This use can be accomplished in as few as six weeks. Excellent buccal interdigitation is possible. After the efficiency and effectiveness of the technique was confirmed, it was then used for the correction of full Class 2 malocclusions. The buccal segments distalize relatively rapidly. With cooperation, Class 2s are corrected in less than six months, while full step Class 2s can take up to a year. Pros and cons One negative effect of this treatment is loss of alignment and control of the anterior section relative to the distalized sections. Open bites with poor tongue posture can be a contraindication for an HSD. The patient/parent needs this to be explained. It is easily recoverable once the buccal segments are seated in a Cl1 relationship with nickel titanium wires. A 19x25 heat-activated wire is mostly used, and the alignment and leveling are recovered in six weeks. One of the proposed benefits of the Carriere Distalizer is that a Cl1 platform is achieved prior to fixed appliances, potentially creating more stability. The HSD Class 2 correction occurs during the fixed phase of treatment. I ve found the HSD Class 2 correction to be stable but it is a relatively new concept. Another benefit of using the HSD is it is unnecessary to have the bite open prior to Class 2 elastic wear. Since the buccal segments are independent, it makes no difference if the maxillary anterior teeth are clear of the lower brackets. In fact, the anterior segment sometimes intrudes during the distalization phase. The concept is also effective in the use of Invisalign and other clear aligner treatments. orthotown.com \\ APRIL 2017 45

Fig. 13 Eight months of using HSD. Fig. 10 12-year-old patient with Class 2, excess overjet and overbite, V-shaped maxillary arch and a midline discrepancy. Fig. 14 initial/final cephs after 22 months of treatment. Note lower incisor control. Fig. 11 Note the use of power chain to help de-rotate teeth. Fig. 12 After six months, 19x25 SS archwires were placed and unilateral HSD was started. Fig. 15 2 years post treatment photographs showing excellent stability of Cl2 correction. Case presentation Like many inventions, the HSD was born out of necessity. The first case it was used on was a transfer case. The patient had been in treatment for approximately one year, and the parents were unhappy with the progress. (Figs. 2 and 3, see p. 44) 46 APRIL 2017 // orthotown.com Apparently, the LR7 was erupting mesially and it took a while for it to upright. However, space was not maintained for the LR5 and it became blocked out. There was significant dumping of the arches, severe midline discrepancy, deep bite, rotated teeth with poor bracket placement, the left side was Cl3 canines, and the right side Class 2. The patient was very cooperative and was wearing headgear every night. To complicate things, she was a junior in high school and was going away to school in less than 16 months. My estimate was it

would take approximately 12 months to align the arches, and then another 8 12 months for AP correction and finalization of the occlusion. Figure 4 (p. 44) shows the progress after 12 months. There were now only four months to finish the case before she went away to school. Due to this timeframe, a quicker way of correcting Class 2s was necessary. The decision was made to section the wire and use a 6 ounce/quarter-inch Class 2 elastic. The HSD was born. (Fig. 5, see p. 44) She was seen one week later because of concerns that the buccal segment might flare out labially which did not occur. (Fig. 6, see p. 45) A progress photo was taken four weeks later, showing almost full Cl1 canine. (Fig. 7, see p. 45) The case was debanded 12 weeks later. Although not an excellent result, given the time constraints and difficulty of the case, an acceptable result was obtained. A nice esthetic result was achieved. (Fig. 8, see p. 45) She was seen recently for new retainers three years post-treatment and photos were taken. (Fig. 9, see p. 45) There was some slippage of the Class 2 correction. Not surprising, considering the Class 2 correction was accomplished in such a short period of time. Today, it is recommended to continue the HSD for at least three months after Cl1 has been achieved. Case #2 After the success with Case #1, the HSD was used only for finalization and improvement of the buccal segments prior to deband. This case was the first case that used the HSD as the only Class 2 mechanics on a growing patient. The patient was a 12-year-old male. Diagnosis included: Class 2 Div1 with an overjet of 7mm and a deep bite of 5mm, convex retrognathic profile, mild to moderate crowding, V-shaped maxillary arch and the lower midline to the right 3mm. (Fig. 10) Level and aligning stage with use of power chain helped to de-rotate teeth. (Fig. 11) After six months 19x25ss arch wires were placed and the HSD began. (Fig. 12) After eight months of HSD, the Class 2 was corrected. Total treatment time was 22 months and the result remained stable at the two-year post treatment check. (Figs. 13 15) Conclusion The HSD represents a new simple, cost effective approach to correcting Class 2 malocclusions with fixed appliances. It requires no special brackets or wires and can be used with any system, including Invisalign. n TRANSITION YOUR PRACTICE Monetize your hard work and continue practicing your way. Let s talk about the benefits of our unique approach. Let s talk about your future. CAREER OPPORTUNITIES Great people give great service. Join our experienced team of Orthodontic and Pediatric Dental practices. springandsprout.network orthotown.com \\ APRIL 2017 47