Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Similar documents
ISR-treatment The Leipzig experience with purely mechanical debulking. Sven Bräunlich Department for Angiology University-Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

How do I use mechanical debulking for the treatment of arterial occlusions

DCB in my practice: How the evidence influences my strategy. Yang-Jin Park

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

Update on the Levant 2 Clinical Trial Programme. Dierk Scheinert, MD University Hospital Leipzig Leipzig, Germany

BIOLUX P-III Passeo-18 Lux All-comers Registry: 12-month Results for the All-Comers Cohort

Promise and limitations of DCB in long lesions What Have we Learned from Clinical Trials? Ramon L. Varcoe, MBBS, MS, FRACS, PhD

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Hiroshi Ando, MD Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital Saitama, Japan

12-month Outcomes of Post Dilatation in the IN.PACT Global CTO Cohort. Gunnar Tepe, MD RodMed Clinic Rosenheim Rosenheim, Germany

Clinical use and safety of the Lutonix DCB for the treatment of BTK: interim data from a prospective registry

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

ILLUMENATE FIH Direct DCB Cohort 12-Month Results

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

The Crack and Pave technique for highly resistant calcified lesions. Manuela Matschuck MD University Hospital Leipzig Department Angiology

Lutonix in AV fistula and Early look AV IDE trial data

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

Latest Insights from the LEVANT II study and sub-group analysis

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

COMPARE-Pilot RCT: 1-year results of a randomised comparison of RANGER DCB vs. IN.PACT DCB in complex SFA lesions. Dierk Scheinert

The latest evidences from the DES trials in peripheral arterial disease

Rotarex mechanical debulking: The Leipzig experience in patients

Klinikum Rosenheim Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Maximizing Outcomes in a complex population with Drug-coated balloon

Lutonix AV Clinical Trial

2 Year Results from the MDT SFA Japan Trial - DCB vs. standard PTA for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the SFA/PPA

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg, MD, FESC Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster. Dierk Scheinert, M.D. Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR

OCT Guided Atherectomy: Initial Results of the VISION Trial Using the Pantheris Catheter. Patrick Muck, MD

Comparison of Angiographic Dissection Patterns Caused by Long vs Short Balloons During Balloon Angioplasty for Chronic Femoropopliteal Occlusions

DCB use in fem-pop lesions of patients with CLI (RCC 4-5): subgroup analysis of IN.PACT Global 12-month outcomes

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

Angiographic dissection pattern and patency outcomes of post balloon angioplasty for SFA lesions -a retrospective multi center analysis-

Alternative concepts for drug delivery in BTK arteries the LIMBO project

Long-term Zilver PTX Data from Japan: 5-year Results in the Real World

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

The importance of scientific evidence. Prof. I. Baumgartner Head Clinical & Interventional Angiology University Hospital Bern

Zilver PTX Post-Market Surveillance Study of Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Treating Femoropopliteal Artery Disease in Japan: 24-Month Results

Dealing with Calcification in BTK Arteries: Is Lithoplasty the Answer?

Dierk Scheinert, MD. Department of Angiology University Hospital Leipzig, Germany

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

MICHAEL R. JAFF, DO MASSACHUSETTS, UNITED STATES. Medtronic Further. Together

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

Michael K. W. Lichtenberg MD, FESC on behalf of KANSHAS 1 investigators; Tepe G, Müller-Hülsbeck S, Deloose K, Verbist J, Goverde P, Zeller T

Lutonix AV Clinical Trial

Mechanical thrombectomy in peripheral interventions: A multitask and effective tool in a widening scenario. Current evidence and technical tips.

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions Preliminary report

Do we really need a stent in long SFA lesions? No: DEB is the answer

Importance of Thorough Vessel Preparation Followed By Anti- Restenotic Therapy: An Update from the DEFINITIVE AR Study

The results of EVT for Chronic Aortic Occlusion - a multicenter retrospective study - Taku Kato, MD Rakuwakai Otowa Hospital, Kyoto, Japan

The Freeway Stent Study: the 12 Months results highly favor the use of DEB in combination with stenting

BioMimics 3D in my Clinical Practice

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

The TANGO Trial: A phase II below-the-knee study investigating the adventitial micro-infusion of Temsirolimus after PTA or atherectomy

Cutting/scoring balloon Cryoplasty Drug-eluting balloon Brachytherapy Debulking Restent (BMS or DES) John R. Laird, MD

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

Adventitial Drug Infusion to Prevent Restenosis

Update on the OPTIMIZE BTK Trial. Marianne Brodmann, MD Division of Angiology Medical University Graz, Austria

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Limb Ischemia. Hwan Jun Jae MD Seoul National University Hospital Seoul, Korea

Massimiliano Fusaro, MD on behalf of ISAR-STATH Investigators. Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München Munich - Germany

SFA CTO Lesion Management laser or directional atherectomy?

Is combination therapy with directional atherectomy followed by DCB the answer to challenges in treating SFA disease?

Treating in-stent occlusions with the Rotarex catheter : The ROBINSON study

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

Excimer Laser angioplasty for femoro-popliteal disease. Sendai Kousei Hospital, Tokyo Kamata Hospital Naoto Inoue MD, FSCAI, FJCC, FAHA

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis: Is the Concept Still Alive? Matthew T. Menard, M.D. Brigham and Women s Hospital Boston, Massachussetts

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

Adventitial Drug Therapy Below-the-Knee: Update on LIMBO and TANGO

The latest generation DEB

Michael K.W. Lichtenberg, MD

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Safety and Feasibility of Intravascular Lithotripsy for Treatment of Common Femoral Artery Stenoses

Qizhuang Jin. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, China

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

LUTONIX AV Clinical Trial

Outcome of DCB and PTA post stenting in occluded versus stenotic lesions subgroup analysis of the randomized Freeway Stent Study

LIBERTY 360 Study. 15-Jun-2018 Data 1. Olinic Dm, et al. Int Angiol. 2018;37:

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

The LIMBO trial: a RCT investigating adventitial dexamethasone infusion to prevent restenosis in BTK arteries utilizing a novel angiographic endpoint

The essentials for BTK procedures: wires, balloons, what else

Atherectomy with thrombectomy of. Rotarex S : The Leipzig experience

Drug-Eluting Balloon Angioplasty versus Bare Metal Stents for Femoropopliteal Disease in Real-World Experience

Paclitaxel-coated versus Plain Balloon Angioplasty in the Treatment of Infrainguinal Vein Bypass Stenosis

Koen Keirse, MD RZ Tienen, Belgium

Luminor DCB in femoropopliteal lesions

Long-term results with interwoven nitinol stents vs. BMS vs. DCB

First time data release: Initial experience with the temporary Spur Stent System: DEEPER Trial first-in-man results Jihad A. Mustapha, MD, FACC,

Novel concept for drug delivery in infrapopliteal arteries The LIMBO trial

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Transcription:

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Market Registy Assessing the Clinical Use and Safety of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Arteries Je Hwan Won, MD Division of Interventional Radiology, Radiology Department Ajou University Hospital, S. Korea

Disclosure Speaker name: Je Hwan Won... I have the following potential conflicts of interest to report: Consulting Employment in industry Stockholder of a healthcare company Owner of a healthcare company Other(s) v I do not have any potential conflict of interest

DCB reimbursement in Korea 2 DCBs for SFA 1 DCB for Popliteal Reimbursement of DCBs for Femoropopliteal artery 70% stenosis in De novo 50% stenosis in ISR 2 for SFA, 1 for Popliteal 1 bail-out stent can be reimbursed for the 50% residual stenosis or dissection On-going discussions for the expansion of DCB reimbursement indication (BTK, AV)

Not All DCBs are created Equal Lutonix 035 DCB Other DCB Carrier: Polysorbate & Sorbitol (IV approved carriers) PTX Dose: 2µg/mm 2 Plasma Half-Life: 6.9 hours Carrier: Urea PTX Dose: 3.0µg/mm 2 Plasma Half-Life: 72.5 hours

Other DCB Other DCB ng /g ng /g Downstream Safety in a Porcine Model Downstream Paclitaxel Concentration: Lutonix (2µg/mm 2 ) vs. Other DCB (3.0µg/mm 2 ) 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Skeletal Muscle Lutonix 1,3 60,8 47x More 28 day (1x dose) Other DCB 210 180 150 120 90 60 30 0 Coronary Band LUTONIX LUTONIX Lutonix 1,5 189 126x More 28 day (1x dose) Other DCB Kolodgie et al, JVIR D-15-01131R1. Preclinical results may not be indicative of clinical performance. Different test methods may yield different results. Lutonix showed significantly lower downstream paclitaxel levels Coronary band BPV/LTNX/0816/0086c

LUTONIX Korean Registry Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Market Registry Assessing the Clinical Use and Safety of the LUTONIX 035 Drug Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Arteries

Study Design Study Design A Prospective, Multicenter, Single Arm, Post-Market Registry Objective Number of Patients/Sites Inclusion Criteria Exclusion Criteria Selected Endpoint To assess the clinical use and safety of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon Catheter in a heterogeneous patient population in real world clinical practice. Approximately 250 subjects at up to 16 sites in Korea Rutherford Clinical Category 4, Stenotic or obstructive vascular lesions Inadequate distal outflow Primary Effectiveness: Freedom from target lesion revascularization(tlr) at 12 months Primary Safety: Freedom at 30 days from the *composite endpoint *: target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation and major reintervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy/thrombolysis) of index limb and device- and procedure-related death.

Subject Disposition Lutonix Korea registry (N=249) Enrolled 249 (100.0%) Completed 6 month (180 days) 241 (96.8%) Completed 12 month (365 days) 232 (93.2%) Discontinued prematurely 16 (6.4%) Withdrawal of consent 1 (0.4%) Death 11 (4.4%) Lost to follow-up 2 (0.8%)

Baseline DCB Demographics Class. Description Korean registry (N=249) Age(Years) Mean (SD) 69.1±10.46 Gender Male 212 (85.1%) Female 37 (14.9%) DM 149 (59.8%) Risk Factor Dyslipidemia 49 (19.7%) Hypertension 176 (70.7%) Cigarette smoking 106 (42.6%) Class 1~2 45.5% Rutherford Grade Class 3 41.3% Class 4 13.2% Class 5~6 -

DCB Angiographic Demographics Classification Korean registry (N=249) Number of Lesions=338 Target Lesion Length (mm) 115.2 (79.42) Calcification 256 / 338 (75.7%) Chronic Total Occlusion 143 / 338 (42.3%) Lesion Locations SFA 248 / 338 (73.3%) Proximal Popliteal 53 / 338 (15.6%) Mid & Distal Popliteal 37 / 338 (10.9%) Bail-out Stenting 22 / 249 (8.8%)

Pretreatment and bailout stenting Variables N=249 Comment Pretreatment Balloon angioplasty 225 / 249 (90.4%) Atherectomy 15 / 249 (6.0%) Others 1 / 249 (0.4%) Cutting balloon Post-DCB treatment Balloon angioplasty 20 / 249 (8.0%) Bail-out stenting 22 / 249 (8.8%) 20 BMS/ 2 Covered stent Device Success: 100.0% Procedural Success*: 96.3% *: residual stenosis > 30% and AE(death, stroke, MI, emergent surgical revascularization, significant distal embolization in the target limb, and thrombosis of the target vessel)

Primary Safety Endpoint Free from * composite events through 30 days N 247 /249 30 DAYS % [95% CI] 99.2% [96.8%, 99.8%] *: target vessel revascularization (TVR) and target lesion revascularization (TLR), major amputation and major reintervention (new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, or thrombectomy / thrombolysis) of index limb and device- and procedure-related death.

Primary safety endpoint at 1 month Variables N=249 Comment TVR 1 TLR 1 LT SECOND TOE WOUND and 100% Stenosis Occlusion of LT. POPLITEAL ARTERY Major reintervention - Death - Procedure-related - Device-related - Major index limb amputation - * Minor index limb amputation *: was not in the list of primary safety endpoint 1 LT 4th toe ray amputation

2 composite events within 30 days EVENT 1 Primary treatment: Pre-dilatation + DCB only + Post-dilatation Over 50% residual stenosis Re-intervention @ 17 days Reason for Re-Intervention: LT SECOND TOE WOUND and 100% Stenosis Location: Target vessel and non-target lesion Treatment: PTA, Stenting EVENT 2 Primary treatment: Pre-dilatation + DCB only 20% residual stenosis Re-intervention @ 25 days Reason for Re-Intervention: Occlusion of LT POPLITEAL ARTERY Location: Target lesion Treatment: PTA, Stenting

Primary Efficacy Endpoint at 1 year Subjects Free from TLR Number of Subjects with TLR 180 DAYS 4 365 DAYS 12 Estimates of Subjects Free from TLR [95% CI] 98.4% [95.7%, 99.4%] 95.0% [91.3%, 97.1%]

LUTONIX Global SFA Registry Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Market Registry Assessing safety, clinical benefit, and outcomes of the Lutonix 035 drug-coated balloon (DCB) in a heterogeneous, real-world patient population at 12 and 24 months in Femoropopliteal Arteries

Baseline DCB Demographics Global registry (N=691) Korean registry (N=249) Age, Mean ± SD (n) 68.2 ± 9.8 (691) 69.1±10.46 Male gender, % (n/n) 67.9% (469/691) 85.1% Obesity 24.7% (164/665) Current Smoker 36.9% (254/689) 42.6% Dyslipidemia 70.0% (484/691) 19.7% Diabetes 39.5% (273/691) 59.8% Hypertension 84.9% (587/691) 70.7% Rutherford Glade Class 1~2 20.6% (142/689) 45.5% Rutherford Glade Class 3 66.9% (461/689) 41.3% Rutherford Glade Class 4 7.4% (51/689) 13.2% Rutherford Glade Class 5~6 1.6% (11/689) -

DCB Angiographic Demographics Classification Global registry (N=691) Korean registry (N=249) > Two lesions treated 15.6% (108/691) Total Lesion Length (mm) 101.2 ± 84.2 (685) 115.2 Treated Length (mm) 136.6 ± 89.7 (689) Calcification 50.2% (238/474) 75.7% Chronic Total Occlusion 31.2% (214/686) 42.3% Lesion Locations SFA 70.0% (483/690) 73.3% Proximal Popliteal 16.8% (116/690) 15.6% Mid & Distal Popliteal 13.1% (91/690) 10.9% Final %Diameter Stenosis 14.6 ± 18.6 (680) Bail-out Stenting 25.2% (174/690) 8.8% Dissection 18.4% (127/690) 2.8%

Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry 12 months results MEASURE % (n / N) Korean Registry 30-day Safety 1 99.4% (681/685) 99.2% Free from TLR 93.4% (605/648) 95.0% 1 Freedom at 30 days from TVR, major index limb amputation, and device-and procedure-related death ALL SAEs adjudicated. Study monitored. http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2017/07/27/j.jcin.2017.04.041?sso=1&sso_redirect_count=3&access_token

Lutonix Global SFA Real-World Registry 24 months results MEASURE % (n / N) Free from TLR 89.3% (526/589) 1 Secondary endpoint. Clinical primary patency of the target lesion was reported by the investigator based on presenting symptoms and clinical exam. http://interventions.onlinejacc.org/content/early/2017/07/27/j.jcin.2017.04.041?sso=1&sso_redirect_count=3&access_token

Conclusions Lutonix DCB Korean registry data shows acceptable safety at 1 month and shows 98.4% at 6 months and further 95.0% at 1 year of freedom from TLR, respectively The results of Lutonix Korean registry are correspond to the results of the global registry. This study have great significance since it shows the efficacy and safety of Lutonix DCB for the large Asian population. Adequate vessel preparation seems to be a critical success factor for the drug delivery and the long-term result of DCB procedure Downstream effect should be considered when you re using multiple DCBs

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data Prospective, Multicenter, Post-Market Registy Assessing the Clinical Use and Safety of the Lutonix Drug Coated Balloon in Femoropopliteal Arteries Je Hwan Won, MD Division of Interventional Radiology, Radiology Department Ajou University Hospital, S. Korea