Prognostic significance of stroma tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer

Similar documents
Breast cancer in elderly patients (70 years and older): The University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville 10 year experience

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

SFSPM Novembre Valeur prédictive et pronostique de l infiltrat immunitaire dans les cancers du sein traités par chimiothérapie néoadjuvante

Only Estrogen receptor positive is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer

PMRT for N1 breast cancer :CONS. Won Park, M.D., Ph.D Department of Radiation Oncology Samsung Medical Center

Exosomal Del 1 as a potent diagnostic marker for breast cancer : A prospective cohort study

EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY. Dr. Carlos Garbino

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

International Society of Breast Pathology. Immune Targeting in Breast Cancer. USCAP 2017 Annual Meeting

Adjuvan Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Breast cancer: Molecular STAGING classification and testing. Korourian A : AP,CP ; MD,PHD(Molecular medicine)

DO YOUNG AGE AND TRIPLE NEGATIVE MOLECULAR SUBTYPE HAVE A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER?

Are there the specific prognostic factors for triplenegative subtype of early breast cancers (pt1-2n0m0)?

Risk group criteria for tailoring adjuvant treatment in patients with endometrial cancer : a validation study of the GOG criteria

Adjuvant Chemotherapy TNBC & HER2 Subtype

Heather M. Gage, MD, Avanti Rangnekar, Robert E. Heidel, PhD, Timothy Panella, MD, John Bell, MD, and Amila Orucevic, MD, PhD

Impact of BMI on pathologic complete response (pcr) following neo adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced breast cancer

Ideal neo-adjuvant Chemotherapy in breast ca. Dr Khanyile Department of Medical Oncology, University of Pretoria

What to do after pcr in different subtypes?

UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin

Is adjuvant chemotherapy necessary for Luminal A-like breast cancer?

How to Use MRI Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Controversies in Breast Pathology ELENA PROVENZANO ADDENBROOKES HOSPITAL, CAMBRIDGE

Claudin-4 Expression in Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Correlation with Androgen Receptors and Ki-67 Expression

Triple negative breast cancer -neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy

The effect of delayed adjuvant chemotherapy on relapse of triplenegative

Clinical Features and Survival Analysis of T1mic, a, bn0m0 Breast Cancer

Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy

Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapies. Stefan Aebi Luzerner Kantonsspital

* * * * Supplementary Figure 1. DS Lv CK HSA CK HSA. CK Col-3. CK Col-3. See overleaf for figure legend. Cancer cells

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Considerations in Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology

Residual cancer burden in locally advanced breast cancer: a superior tool

Tumor-infiltrating immune cell profiles and their change after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict response and prognosis of breast cancer

Breast : ASCO Abstracts for Review

The Depth of Tumor Invasion is Superior to 8 th AJCC/UICC Staging System to Predict Patients Outcome in Radical Cystectomy.

A Study on Importance of Molecular Subtyping As a Prognostic Indicator of Breast Carcinoma

Evaluation of Pathologic Response in Breast Cancer Treated with Primary Systemic Therapy

The Oncotype DX Assay in the Contemporary Management of Invasive Early-stage Breast Cancer

The Role of Pathologic Complete Response (pcr) as a Surrogate Marker for Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Where Are We Now?

Contemporary Classification of Breast Cancer

Clinical significance and prognostic value of receptor conversion in hormone receptor positive breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Bum-Sup Jang and In Ah Kim. ¹Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Graduate School of Medicine 2

OUTLINE PAST PRESENTFUTURE BREAST CANCER INCIDENCE AND MORTALITY CURRENT STATE OF MEDICAL ONCOLOGY SECOND ANNUAL BREAST CANCER SYMPOSIUM

Adjuvant chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients: how to decide?

Advances in Breast Cancer Therapeutics in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Settings. Eve Rodler, MD University of California at Davis October 2016

SCIENCE CHINA Life Sciences

Evolving Insights into Adjuvant Chemotherapy. Joyce O Shaughnessy, MD Baylor Sammons Cancer Center Texas Oncology US Oncology

Predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes to pathological complete response in neoadjuvant treated triplenegative

Radiation Therapy for the Oncologist in Breast Cancer

10/15/2012. Biologic Subtypes of TNBC. Topics. Topics. Histopathology Molecular pathology Clinical relevance

Overview of peculiarities and therapeutic options for patients with breast cancer and a BRCA germline mutation

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

Type: Evidence Based Evidence Quality: High Strength of Recommendation: Strong

Clinical activity of fulvestrant in metastatic breast cancer previously treated with endocrine therapy and/or chemotherapy

Maram Abdaljaleel, MD Dermatopathologist and Neuropathologist University of Jordan, School of Medicine

Retrospective analysis to determine the use of tissue genomic analysis to predict the risk of recurrence in early stage invasive breast cancer.

Recent advances in breast cancers

Triple negative breast cancer Biology and targeted therapy

WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH TUMOUR BUDDING IN EARLY COLORECTAL CANCER?

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Current Status of Biomarkers (including DNA Tumor Markers and Immunohistochemistry in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Tumors)

2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Review

Clinical Outcome of Reconstruction With Tissue Expanders for Patients With Breast Cancer and Mastectomy

Breast Cancer: ASCO Poster Review

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships. Breast Pathology Evening Specialty Conference Case #4. Clinical Case: Pathologic Features

Clinical and pathological portraits of axillary presentation breast cancer and effects of preoperative systemic therapy

Financial Disclosure. Learning Objectives. None. To understand the clinical applicability of the NCDB Breast Cancer PUF

Question 1 A. ER-, PR-, HER+ B. ER+, PR+, HER2- C. ER-, PR+, HER2- D. ER-, PR-, HER2- E. ER-, PR+, HER2+

SYSTEMIC THERAPY OPTIONS FOR BREAST CANCER IN 2014

Clinical Research on PARP Inhibitors and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

SYSTEMIC TREATMENT OF TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER

Breast Cancer Immunotherapy. Leisha A. Emens, MD PhD Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy

Predictive and prognostic impact of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy

38 years old, premenopausal, had L+snbx. Pathology: IDC Gr.II T-1.9cm N+2/4sn ER+100%st, PR+60%st, Her2-neg, KI %

Triple Negative Breast Cancer. Eric P. Winer, MD Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston, MA October, 2008

Editorial Process: Submission:11/30/2017 Acceptance:01/04/2019

Time to Start Adjuvant Systemic Treatment in Breast Cancer; a Retrospective Cohort Study

Implications of ACOSOG Z11 for Clinical Practice: Surgical Perspective

XXV Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica y División Española de la International Academy of Pathology

Review of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant abstracts from SABCS 2011 January 7 th 2012

Immunohistochemical classification of breast tumours

A Case of Androgen Receptor-positive Triple Negative Breast Cancer with Good Response to Anti-androgen Therapy

Mismatch repair status, inflammation and outcome in patients with primary operable colorectal cancer

TNBC: What s new Déjà vu All Over Again? Lucy R. Langer, MD MSHS Compass Oncology - SABCS 2016 Review February 21, 2017

Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients

Novel Preoperative Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Debu Tripathy, MD University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Early Stage Disease. Hope S. Rugo, MD Professor of Medicine Director Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center

Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Ki67 Index, HER2 Status, and Prognosis of Patients With Luminal B Breast Cancer

Triple Negative Breast cancer New treatment options arenowhere?

Haruo Ohtani, 1,2 Kazuko Mori-Shiraishi, 3 Morio Nakajima 3 and Hamaichi Ueki 3

Table S2. Expression of PRMT7 in clinical breast carcinoma samples

2017 Topics. Biology of Breast Cancer. Omission of RT in older women with low-risk features

DR. BOMAN N. DHABHAR Consulting Oncologist Jaslok Hospital, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Wockhardt Hospital Mumbai & BND Onco Centre INDIA

How can we Personalize RT as part of Breast-Conserving Therapy?

Jinsil Seong, MD 1 Ik Jae Lee, MD, PhD 2 Joon Seong Park, MD 3 Dong Sup Yoon, MD 3 Kyung Sik Kim, MD 4 Woo Jung Lee, MD 4 Kyung Ran Park, MD 5

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Transcription:

Prognostic significance of stroma tumorinfiltrating lymphocytes according to molecular subtypes of breast cancer Hee Jung Kwon, Nuri Jang, Min Hui Park, Young Kyung Bae Department of Pathology, Yeungnam University College of Medicine

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Backgroud Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) Indicator of immune microenvironment in cancer tissues Prognostic factor and predictor of therapeutic efficacy

Aim of this study 1. To investigate whether stromal TILs (stils) which is measured in routine clinical practice is prognostic in breast cancer 2. To find valid cutoffs for TILs that represent clinical significance

Material & Methods Invasive breast carcinoma samples (n=1489) Patients who underwent surgical resection between 1995-2007 postoperative follow-up: 0-238 months (median, 117 months) Adjuvant chemotherapy Chemotherapy type Regimen Number of cases None 208 208 Anthracyclines FEC 620 1024 AC 274 FAC 130 Others 5-FU 133 257 CMF 94 Taxol, taxotere, furtulon, xeloda 30 Total 1489 1489

Material & Methods Measurement of TILs one representative whole section H&E slide Inside the borders of invasive tumor Only stromal TILs (lymphocytes and plasma cells) Percentage of stromal TILs over the analyzed stromal area (1%, 5%, 10%, 20%, 30%...) Average TILs (not hotspots) International TILs Working Group 2014 (Ann Oncol 2014; 26: 259) + Average

Material & Methods Molecular subtypes St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 Ann. Oncol. 2013; 24: 2206-2223 Subtype Definition No. of cases Luminal A ER+/PR+/HER2 /Ki-67 20% 424 Luminal B, HER2-negative Luminal B, HER2-positive ER+/HER2 /Ki-67>20% or ER+/HER2 /PR or low ER+/HER2+/any Ki-67/any PR 467 123 HER2-positive ER /PR /HER2+ 155 Triple-negative ER /PR /HER2 308 Unknown 12 Total 1489 278

Results Representative cases showing variable density of TILs 1% 10% 40% 70%

Results Distribution of cases according to % stromal TILs TILs high (n=427, 28.7%) Mean: 9.85% Median: 5% ROC curve: 5% (AUC=0.598; 95% CI, 0.570-0.625; p<0.001)

Results Correlations between TILs and clinicopathological parameters Parameter Total cases TILs (n=1489) (%) Low (%) (n = 1062) High (%) (n = 427) P-value Age 0.847 <50 975 (65.5) 697 (65.6) 278 (65.1) 50 514 (34.5) 365 (34.4) 149 (34.9) Tumor size 0.001 2 cm 787 (52.9) 591 (55.6) 196 (45.9) >2 cm 702 (47.1) 471 (44.4) 231 (54.1) LN metastasis 0.524 Absent 809 (54.4) 571 (53.9) 238 (55.7) Present 677 (45.6) 488 (46.1) 189 (44.3) LVI 0.182 Absent 737 (49.5) 514 (48.4) 223 (52.2) Present 752 (50.5) 548 (51.6) 204 (47.8) Histological grade <0.001 1 and 2 703 (47.2) 613 (57.7) 90 (21.1) 3 786 (52.8) 449 (42.3) 337 (78.9) Estrogen receptor <0.001 Negative 476 (32.0) 219 (20.6) 257 (60.2) Positive 1013 (68.0) 843 (79.4) 170 (39.8) Progesterone receptor <0.001 Negative 615 (41.3) 330 (31.1) 285 (66.7) Positive 874 (58.7) 732 (68.9) 142 (33.3) HER2 <0.001 Negative 1207 (81.1) 908 (85.5) 299 (70.0) Positive 282 (18.9) 154 (14.5) 128 (30.0) Ki-67 labeling index <0.001 20% 621 (41.7) 540 (50.9) 81 (19.0) >20% 867 (58.3) 521 (49.1) 346 (81.0)

Results TILs according to molecular subtypes Comparison of TILs between two different molecular subtypes Lum A Lum B (HER2-) HER2+ TNBC Lum A Lum B (HER2-) p=0.147* HER2+ p<0.001* p<0.001* TNBC p<0.001* p<0.001* p<0.001* *P value by one-way ANOVA

Results TILs according to adjuvant chemotherapy Comparison of TILs between two different treatment groups No CTx Anthracycline Nonanthracycli ne No CTx p<0.001* Anthracycline Nonanthracycli ne p=0.024 p=0.270 *P value by one-way ANOVA

Results: Survival analysis in all patients (n=1489) High TILs (n=427) High TILs (n=427) Low TILs (n=1062) Low TILs (n=1062) p=0.09 p<0.001

Results: Survival analysis in all patients (n=1489) Multivariate analysis for DFS TILs, 10% p<0.001 Tumor size, >2 cm p=0.016 LN metastasis LVI p=0.001 p<0.001 Histologic grade, 3 ER positivity PR positivity HER2 positivity Ki-67, >20% Adjuvant CTx -anthracyclines Adjuvant CTx -non-anthracyclines * * * * * p=0.001 * favorable unfavorable Hazard ratio (range, 95% confidence interval) for recurrence/metastasis * p>0.05

Results: Survival analysis according to adjuvant chemotherapy in all patients (n=1489) Low TILs group (n=1062) High TILs group (n=427) No chemotherapy (n=175) Non-anthracycline (n=191) Anthracycline (n=696) Anthracycline (n=328) Non-anthracycline (n=66) No chemotherapy (n=33) p<0.001 p=0.222

Results: subgroup analysis No chemotherapy (n=208) Anthracyclines (n=1024) Non-anthracyclines (n=257) Low TILs (n=175) High TILs (n=33) High TILs (n=328) Low TILs (n=696) Low TILs (n=191) High TILs (n=66) p=0.293 p=0.012 p=0.873 Low TILs (n=175) High TILs (n=328) High TILs (n=66) High TILs (n=33) Low TILs (n=696) Low TILs (n=191) p=0.02 p<0.001 p=0.158

Results: Survival analysis in anthracycline group (n=1014) Luminal A Luminal B (HER2-) HER2+ Triple-negative High TILs (n=22) High TILs (n=59) High TILs (n=106) High TILs (n=137) Low TILs (n=220) Low TILs (n=254) Low TILs (n=122) Low TILs (n=94) p=0.519 p=0.012 p=0.064 p=0.063 p=0.394 p=0.002 p=0.007 p=0.031

Multivariate analysis for DFS Luminal B (HER2-) subtype TILs, 10% p=0.003 Tumor size, >2 cm Histologic grade, 3 p=0.009 p=0.002 HER2+ subtype TILs, 10% p=0.011 LVI p=0.045 Triple-negative subtype TILs, 10% p=0.034 LVI p<0.001 Hazard ratio (range, 95% confidence interval) for recurrence/metastasis

Conclusion High TILs ( 10%) was significantly associated with large tumor size (>2cm), histologic grade 3, negative hormone receptors, positive HER2 status and high Ki-67 (>20%) Prognostic significance of TILs was associated with adjuvant treatment and molecular subtypes High TILs was predictive of better OS and DFS in patients who received adjuvant anthracyclines in univariate and multivariate analyses High TILs was an independent marker for favorable DFS in patients with luminal B (HER2-), HER2+, and TNBC in univariate and multivariate analyses High TILs could be a useful marker to predict therapeutic effect of anthracyclines in luminal B, as well as HER2-positive and triple-negative subtypes of breast cancer