High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: a prospective cohort study

Similar documents
Improving the detection of myocardial infarction in women

Supplementary appendix

High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I at presentation in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome: a cohort study

CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDY

Edinburgh Research Explorer

Randomized comparison of single versus double mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 5 year outcomes of the Arterial Revascularization Trial

High sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under-diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: prospective cohort study

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

Troponin when is an assay high sensitive?

High-Sensitive Troponin in the Evaluation of patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (High-STEACS): a stepped-wedge cluster-randomised controlled trial

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of 60 hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and warfarin use

FEV1 predicts length of stay and in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery

Supplement materials:

Ulster, Ireland. Submitted: 21 June 2009; Revised: 24 January 2010; Published: 13 September 2010 Petrazzuoli F, Soler JK, Buono N, Dobbs F

Trial to Reduce. Aranesp* Therapy. Cardiovascular Events with

egfr > 50 (n = 13,916)

Diagnostic and prognostic benefits of CTCA using the 2016 NICE guidance within a randomised trial

Cardiovascular risk reduction in diabetes Lipids (NICE CG181)

Recent community campaigns on

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

What is a myocardial infarction and how do we treat it? Paul Das Consultant Cardiologist North Wales Cardiac Centre Glan Clwyd Hospital

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CARE EXCELLENCE General practice Indicators for the NICE menu

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

Chronic Benefit Application Form Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

European Heart Journal 2015 doi: /eurheartj/ehv320

Coronary Heart Disease

Lowering blood pressure (BP) in patients with type 2

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Treatment Of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone antagonist (TOPCAT) AHA Nov 18, 2014 Update on Randomized Trials

REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease

Cardiology. Self Learning Package. Module 5: Pharmacology: Treatment of Acute Coronary. Prevention

The Author(s) This article is published with open access by ASEAN Federation of Cardiology

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Medical Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The roles of a noncardiologist. Norbert Lingling D. Uy, MD Professor of Medicine UERMMMCI

Toledo Hospital Clinical Quality Indicators. Effective - Heart Attack

Defining rise and fall of cardiac troponin values

STABILITY Stabilization of Atherosclerotic plaque By Initiation of darapladib TherapY. Harvey D White on behalf of The STABILITY Investigators

Cardiovascular Health Practice Guideline Outpatient Management of Coronary Artery Disease 2003

Program Metrics. New Unique ID. Old Unique ID. Metric Set Metric Name Description. Old Metric Name

Measurement Name Beta-Blocker Therapy Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)

2003 World Health Organization (WHO) / International Society of Hypertension (ISH) Statement on Management of Hypertension.

Cardiology Department Coimbra Hospital and Medical School Portugal

6/1/18 LEARNING OBJECTIVES PATIENT POPULATION PRESENTATIONS

The ESC Registry on Chronic Ischemic Coronary Disease

Troponin Assessment. Does it Carry Clinical Message? Stefan Blankenberg. University Heart Center Hamburg

Preventive Cardiology Scientific evidence

ARIC HEART FAILURE HOSPITAL RECORD ABSTRACTION FORM. General Instructions: ID NUMBER: FORM NAME: H F A DATE: 10/13/2017 VERSION: CONTACT YEAR NUMBER:

HFpEF, Mito or Realidad?

Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke, Primary and Secondary Prevention Guidelines (Cholesterol)

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

Treatment to reduce cardiovascular risk: multifactorial management

Inter-regional differences and outcome in unstable angina

2013 Hypertension Measure Group Patient Visit Form

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

EDUCATIONAL COMMENTARY CARDIAC FUNCTION: BIOCHEMICAL MARKERS UPDATE

CVD risk assessment using risk scores in primary and secondary prevention

Long-Term Complications of Diabetes Mellitus Macrovascular Complication

Early discharge in selected patients after an acute coronary syndrome can it be safe?

Protecting the heart and kidney: implications from the SHARP trial

2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting Without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation

Practice-Level Executive Summary Report

Canagliflozin for Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: Results From the CANVAS Program

Primary and Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease. Frank J. Green, M.D., F.A.C.C. St. Vincent Medical Group

Module 2. Global Cardiovascular Risk Assessment and Reduction in Women with Hypertension

Preoperative tests (update)

Supplementary Appendix

Jin Wi, 1 Young-Guk Ko, 1 Jung-Sun Kim, 1 Byeong-Keuk Kim, 1 Donghoon Choi, 1 Jong-Won Ha, 1 Myeong-Ki Hong, 1,2 Yangsoo Jang 1,2 ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Quality Payment Program: Cardiology Specialty Measure Set

Rapid exclusion of acute myocardial infarction in patients with undetectable troponin using a sensitive troponin I assay

Hypothesis: When compared to conventional balloon angioplasty, cryoplasty post-dilation decreases the risk of SFA nses in-stent restenosis

Update on Current Trends in Hypertension Management

Sheffield guidelines for the use of antiplatelets in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular disease (October 2017)

Impact of Aging on High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T in Patients Suspected of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Post Operative Troponin Leak: David Smyth Christchurch New Zealand

Sample Submission Form Hypertension in childhood and adolescence

Primary Prevention of Stroke

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

IFCC Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Biomarkers (TF-CB) Report to the General Conference 2016 Madrid

Non ST Elevation-ACS. Michael W. Cammarata, MD

Andreas Baumbach Bristol Heart Institute Bristol Royal Infirmary. London 27/1/2005

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

Evaluation of a diagnostic pathway in heart failure in primary care, using electrocardiography and brain natriuretic peptide guided echocardiography

14/15 Threshold 15/16 Points 15/16. Points. Retired Replaced by NM82/AF007. Replacement NO CHANGE

Supplementary Online Content

Overcoming the Risk-Treatment Paradox in Non-STE ACS: It s Time! Christopher Granger, MD

How Low Do We Go? Update on Hypertension

Cardiovascular Concerns in Intermediate Care

Characteristics of Transient ST-Elevation versus ST-Elevation and Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Stroke secondary prevention. Gill Cluckie Stroke Nurse Consultant St. George s Hospital

STATINS EVALUATION IN CORONARY PROCEDURES AND REVASCULARIZATION

Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment: Approach & Guidelines

Cardiovascular Disease in Women -Vive La Difference? Dr Homeyra Douglas Consultant Cardiologist Aintree University Hospital

ESC GUIDELINES ON DIABETES AND CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES

Condition/Procedure Measure Compliance Criteria Reference Attribution Method

Diabetes and the Heart

The contractor establishes and maintains a register of patients with AF

D M Y Y Y Y D D M M Y Y Y Y. Previous MI (apart from acute PCI) 0=no 1=yes 9=unknown

Unstable angina and NSTEMI

Supplementary appendix

Transcription:

DATA SUPPLEMENT High-sensitivity cardiac troponin and the under diagnosis of myocardial infarction in women: a prospective cohort study Anoop SV Shah, 1 Megan Griffiths, 1 Kuan Ken Lee, 1 David A McAllister, 2 Amanda L Hunter, 1 Anne Cruikshank, 3 Alan Reid, 3 Mary Stoddart, 4 Fiona Strachan, 1 Simon Walker, 4 Paul O Collinson, 5 Fred S Apple, 6 Alasdair J Gray, 7 Keith AA Fox, 1 David E Newby 1 and Nicholas L Mills 1 1 BHF Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 2 Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 3 Department of Biochemistry, Southern General Hospital, United Kingdom 4 Department of Biochemistry, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom 5 Department of Cardiology, St George s Hospital and Medical School, United Kingdom 6 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, United States of America 7 Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, United Kingdom Correspondence and requests for reprints: Dr Nicholas L Mills BHF/University Centre for Cardiovascular Science Chancellor s Building University of Edinburgh Edinburgh EH16 4SB United Kingdom Tel: +44 131 242 6515 Fax: +44 131 242 6379 E-mail: nick.mills@ed.ac.uk Support: British Heart Foundation Special Project Grant (SP/12/10/29922), Clinical Research Scholarship (SS/CH/09/002), Intermediate Fellowship (FS/10/024/28266) and Chair Award (CH/09/002). Table and Figures: 4 1

Table S1. Diagnosis of myocardial infarction using contemporary and high-sensitivity assays Contemporary assay a High-sensitivity assay (single threshold) b High-sensitivity assay P-value d P-value e (sex-specific threshold) c All patients (n=1,126) Type 1 myocardial infarction 172 (15%) 222 (20%) 242 (21%) <0.001 0.003 Type 2 myocardial infarction 47 (4%) 55 (5%) 56 (5%) 0.012 0.999 Myocardial injury 27 (2%) 38 (3%) 40 (4%) <0.001 0.727 Unstable angina 38 (3%) 28 (2%) 28 (2%) 0.004 0.999 Other 842 (75%) 783 (70%) 760 (68%) <0.001 0.004 Men (n=622) Type 1 myocardial infarction 117 (19%) 142 (23%) 131 (21%) 0.001 0.002 Type 2 myocardial infarction 27 (4%) 30 (5%) 28 (5%) 0.999 0.999 Myocardial injury 12 (2%) 15 (2%) 12 (2%) 0.999 0.999 Unstable angina 27 (4%) 20 (3%) 22 (4%) 0.074 0.480 Other 439 (71%) 415 (67%) 429 (69%) 0.035 0.035 Women (n=504) Type 1 myocardial infarction 55 (11%) 80 (16%) 111 (22%) <0.001 <0.001 Type 2 myocardial infarction 20 (4%) 25 (5%) 28 (6%) 0.008 0.250 Myocardial injury 15 (3%) 23 (5%) 28 (6%) <0.001 0.250 Unstable angina 11 (2%) 8 (2%) 6 (1%) 0.073 0.480 Other 403 (80%) 368 (73%) 331 (66%) <0.001 <0.001 a. Contemporary assay single threshold 50 ng/l b. High-sensitivity assay single threshold 26 ng/l c. High-sensitivity assay sex-specific thresholds: women 16 ng/l and men 34 ng/l d. McNemar s test comparing diagnosis based on high-sensitivity troponin assay using sex-specific thresholds to the contemporary assay using a single threshold e. McNemar s test comparing diagnosis based on high-sensitivity troponin assay using sex-specific thresholds to the high-sensitivity assay using a single threshold 2

3

Table S2. Baseline characteristics of women with and without myocardial infarction where assays were concordant (groups 3 and 1 respectively) and those only identified using the high-sensitivity assay with sex-specific thresholds (group 2)* Group 1 n=337 Group 2 n=56 Group 3 n=55 Age 65 (16) 76 (12) 75 (15) Chest pain 264 (79) 42 (75) 48 (87) Risk Factors Smoker 57 (19) 10 (20) 8 (15) Hypertension 165 (49) 36 (64) 31 (56) Hyperlipidaemia 135 (40) 28 (50) 20 (36) Diabetes mellitus 43 (13) 11 (20) 9 (16) Past medical history Ischaemic heart disease 124 (37) 34 (61) 17 (31) Myocardial infarction 56 (17) 23 (41) 13 (24) Ischaemic stroke 15 (4) 7 (12) 5 (9) Transient ischaemic attack 21 (6) 1 (2) 3 (5) Peripheral vascular disease 2 (1) 0 (0) 3 (5) Revascularisation Previous PCI 32 (10) 7 (12) 7 (13) Previous CABG 12 (4) 5 (9) 2 (4) Haemodynamics Systolic pressure, mmhg 137 (25) 137 (30) 138 (30) Diastolic pressure, mmhg 71 (14) 71 (17) 75 (18) Heart rate, beats per minute 77 (18) 83 (21) 84 (18) Clinical chemistry Haemoglobin, g/dl 130 (56) 127 (15) 125 (17) Creatinine, mg/dl 72 (23) 90 (38) 95 (49) Urea, mg/dl 6 (6) 9 (8) 7 (4) Cholesterol, mmol/l 5 (1) 5 (1) 5 (1) Electrocardiography ST elevation 9 (3) 5 (9) 16 (30) ST depression 23 (7) 11 (20) 13 (24) T wave inversion 63 (20) 15 (27) 12 (22) Admission drugs Aspirin, n (%) 109 (33) 29 (54) 20 (36) Clopidogrel, n (%) 37 (11) 9 (17) 4 (7) B-blockers, n (%) 83 (25) 22 (41) 14 (25) ACE inhibitors, n (%) 89 (27) 21 (39) 23 (42) Statins, n (%) 123 (37) 30 (56) 20 (36) Warfarin, n (%) 15 (5) 7 (13) 3 (5) Proton pump inhibitor, n (%) 119 (36) 26 (48) 20 (36) *Excludes patients adjudicated as type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury 4

Table S3. Baseline characteristics of men with and without myocardial infarction where assays were concordant (groups 3 and 1 respectively) and those only identified using the high-sensitivity assay with sex-specific thresholds (group 2)* Group 1 n=451 Group 2 n=14 Group 3 n=117 Age 61 (15) 64 (17) 67 (14) Chest pain, n (%) 383 (85) 14 (100) 99 (85) Risk Factors Smoker, n (%) 145 (34) 6 (46) 38 (34) Hypertension, n (%) 227 (50) 7 (50) 61 (53) Hyperlipidaemia, n (%) 210 (47) 9 (64) 54 (47) Diabetes mellitus, n (%) 69 (15) 3 (21) 25 (22) Past medical history Ischaemic heart disease, n (%) 193 (43) 9 (64) 54 (47) Myocardial infarction, n (%) 135 (30) 8 (57) 33 (28) Ischaemic stroke, n (%) 38 (8) 3 (21) 8 (7) Transient ischaemic attack, n (%) 20 (4) 0 (0) 3 (3) Peripheral vascular disease, n (%) 12 (3) 1 (7) 8 (7) Revascularisation Previous PCI, n (%) 93 (21) 4 (29) 18 (16) Previous CABG, n (%) 40 (9) 2 (14) 14 (12) Haemodynamics Systolic pressure, mmhg 133 (22) 141 (23) 131 (22) Diastolic pressure, mmhg 73 (15) 75 (14) 74 (14) Heart rate, beats per minute 78 (18) 78 (15) 81 (22) Clinical chemistry Haemoglobin, g/dl 141 (17) 142 (24) 138 (21) Creatinine, mg/dl 82 (24) 133 (197) 104 (57) Urea, mg/dl 6 (3) 7 (6) 7 (4) Cholesterol, mmol/l 4 (1) 5 (1) 5 (1) Electrocardiography ST elevation, n (%) 36 (8) 1 (8) 42 (36) ST depression, n (%) 13 (3) 1 (8) 29 (25) T wave inversion, n (%) 75 (17) 3 (23) 34 (29) Admission drugs Aspirin, n (%) 178 (40) 9 (64) 46 (40) Clopidogrel, n (%) 55 (12) 5 (36) 12 (11) Beta-blockers, n (%) 119 (27) 8 (57) 34 (30) ACE inhibitors / ARB, n (%) 149 (34) 5 (36) 38 (33) Statin, n (%) 194 (44) 8 (57) 52 (45) Warfarin, n (%) 28 (6) 1 (7) 6 (5) Proton pump inhibitor, n (%) 139 (31) 6 (43) 31 (27) *Excludes patients adjudicated as type 2 myocardial infarction or myocardial injury 5

6

Figure S1. Distribution of troponin and upper reference limits (99th percentile) in 4,590 samples from healthy men and women Reference population consists of 1,531 persons with an equal number of men and women. Inclusion criteria were age 21 to 75 years, no previous medical illness, normal renal function (egfr >60 ml/min), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 6% and normal B-type naturetic peptide concentrations (male 25 pg/ml and female 40 pg/ml) (Rogers et al Clin Chem; 2013 (10) A225). 7