Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.11b: Add-on drugs for inhaled steroids: Long acting or oral B2 agonists

Similar documents
measured Improvement in am PEFR FP vs BUD gave +11l/min FP vs BDP gave nonsignificant improvement in PEFR +3l/min FP: BUD ratio 1.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Dual-Controller Asthma Therapy: Rationale and Clinical Benefits

Asthma Update A/Prof. John Abisheganaden. Senior Consultant, Dept Of Respiratory & Crit Care Medicine Tan Tock Seng Hospital

Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.15: Mometasone Furoate dry powder inhalation evidence

G. Boyd on behalf of a UK Study group

Tips on managing asthma in children

Treatment Responses. Ronald Dahl, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark

Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.4d: Leukotriene receptor antagonists with short-acting betaagonists

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Predicting, Preventing and Managing Asthma Exacerbations. Heather Zar Department of Paediatrics & Child Health University of Cape Town South Africa

BUDESONIDE AND FORMOTEROL (SYMBICORT ): Α A REVIEW

Breakfast Session Prof Neil Barnes Professor of Respiratory Medicine London Chest Hospital & The Royal London Hospital United Kingdom

Clinical efficacy of montelukast in anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma and allergic rhinitis

Budesonide treatment of moderate and severe asthma in children: A doseresponse

Abstract Background Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has antiinflammatory

Scottish Medicines Consortium

DR REBECCA THOMAS CONSULTANT RESPIRATORY PHYSICIAN YORK DISTRICT HOSPITAL

), the dose of histamine required to provoke a fall in FEV 1. of more than 20% (PD 20

Study No.: SAM40012 Title: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel group comparison of three treatments : 1)

Potency ratio fluticasone propionate (Flixotide Diskus)/budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler)

W e have shown in a previous meta-analysis of placebo

Salmeterol, a new long acting inhaled,f2 adrenoceptor agonist: comparison with salbutamol in adult asthmatic patients

#1 cause of school absenteeism in children 13 million missed days annually

Drug Class Review on Beta 2 -Agonists

International Journal of Medical Science and Education pissn eissn

Meeting the Challenges of Asthma

T he use of inhaled corticosteroids to control the inflammatory

The FDA Critical Path Initiative

Patient characteristics Intervention Comparison Length of followup

International Journal of Medical Research & Health Sciences

Treatment of acute asthmatic exacerbations with an increased dose of inhaled steroid

Dual-controller therapy, or combinations REVIEW DUAL-CONTROLLER REGIMENS I: DATA FROM RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS.

Diagnosis, Assessment, Monitoring and Pharmacological Treatment of Asthma

Public Assessment Report for paediatric studies submitted in accordance with Article 45 of Regulation (EC) No1901/2006, as amended.

Omalizumab (Xolair ) ( Genentech, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.) September Indication

Asthma Upate 2018: What s New Since the 2007 Asthma Guidelines of NAEPP?

Asthma training. Mike Levin Division of Asthma and Allergy Red Cross Hospital

Anti-IgE for chronic asthma in adults and children (Review)

Study designs and PD/Clinical endpoints to demonstrate therapeutic equivalence: European Views

ASTRAZENECA v GLAXOSMITHKLINE

Challenges in Meeting International Requirements for Clinical Bioequivalence of Inhaled Drug Products

Disclosures. The Montreal Protocol. The Spectrum of Obstructive Lung Disease: Asthma & COPD. The Spectrum of Obstructive Lung Disease: Asthma & COPD

Treatment choices for patients with asthma or COPD. Jo Riley Lead Nurse For Oxfordshire Respiratory Service

Methacholine versus Mannitol Challenge in the Evaluation of Asthma Clinical applications of methacholine and mannitol challenges

Type of intervention Treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

SYNOPSIS. Co-ordinating investigator Not applicable. Study centre(s) This study was conducted in Japan (57 centres).

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized

Assessment Report for Appraisal of Corticosteroids for the treatment of Chronic Asthma in Children under 12 years

Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Choosing an inhaler for COPD made simple. Dr Simon Hart Castle Hill Hospital

Supplementary Appendix

Scottish Medicines Consortium

12/18/2017. Disclosures. Asthma Management Updates: A Focus on Long-acting Muscarinic Antagonists and Intermittent Inhaled Corticosteroid Dosing

Secondary Outcome/Efficacy Variable(s):

Clinical efficacy of low-dose inhaled budesonide once or twice daily in children with mild asthma not previously treated with steroids

Achieving guideline-based asthma control: does the patient benefit?

James P. Kemp, MD; Margaret C. Minkwitz, PhD; Catherine M. Bonuccelli, MD; and Marshelle S. Warren, MD

T he development of tolerance following the use of long

Asthma in Pregnancy. Asthma. Chronic Airway Inflammation. Objective Measures of Airflow. Peak exp. flow rate (PEFR)

Practical Approach to Managing Paediatric Asthma

ASTHMA PRESCRIBING GUIDELINES FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN OVER 12

Who can get most benefit

Childhood Asthma. The pathophysiology of asthma is an interplay. CME Case Study. Case Study. By Moyez B. Ladhani, MD, CCFP, FAAP, FRCPC

Allwin Mercer Dr Andrew Zurek

Learning the Asthma Guidelines by Case Studies

Demonstrating Bioequivalence of Locally Acting Orally Inhaled Drug Products

Time course of action of two inhaled corticosteroids, fluticasone propionate and budesonide

Alternative agents for anti-inflammatory treatment of asthma

Improved asthma control with budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler, compared with budesonide alone

Montelukast vs. Inhaled Low-Dose Budesonide as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Mild Persistent Asthma: A Randomized Double Blind Controlled Trial

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Differences in the pharmacodynamics of budesonide/formoterol and salmeterol/fluticasone reflect differences in their therapeutic usefulness in asthma

Step-down approach in chronic stable asthma: A comparison of reducing dose Inhaled Formoterol/ Budesonide with maintaining Inhaled Budesonide.

Starting with a Higher Dose of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Primary Care Asthma Treatment

Asthma Assessment & Review

Medicines Management of Asthma

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

ADULT ASTHMA GUIDE SUMMARY. This summary provides busy health professionals with key guidance for assessing and treating adult asthma.

Management of wheeze in pre-school children. Prof Colin Robertson, Respiratory Medicine, Royal Children s Hospital, Melbourne

II: Moderate Worsening airflow limitations Dyspnea on exertion, cough, and sputum production; patient usually seeks medical

What s new in COPD? Apichart Khanichap MD. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat university

Safety of β2-agonists in asthma

TORCH: Salmeterol and Fluticasone Propionate and Survival in COPD

Frequency of nocturnal symptoms in asthmatic children attending a hospital out-patient clinic

Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids?

Position within the Organisation

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 15 December 2010

Effect of disease duration on dose response of inhaled budesonide in asthma

Do current treatment protocols adequately prevent airway remodeling in children with mild intermittent asthma?

Paediatric Public Assessment Report EU Work sharing Procedure - Assessment of Paediatric data. Pulmicort Turbuhaler. Powder for inhalation.

KewKM,KarnerC,MindusSM,FerraraG. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

Asthma Guidelines and Pharmacological Treatment. Dr James Wilkinson

Alberta Childhood Asthma Pathway for Primary Care

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

The recent guidelines from the

Outline FEF Reduced FEF25-75 in asthma. What does it mean and what are the clinical implications?

Evidence-based recommendations or Show me the patients selected and I will tell you the results

Adult Summary flowchart for Asthma Switch and Step Down to preferred inhaler choices

Transcription:

1 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 Guideline topic: Pharmacological management of asthma Evidence table 4.11b: Add-on drugs for steroids: Long acting or oral B2 agonists Author Year Study type Quality rating Population Outomes measured Effect size Confidence intervals / p values Comments Adults Brambilla 1 1994 RCT ++ 159 patients aged 18-67 (mean 41). FEV, 50-90% pred. And >15% reversibility to b2 agonists. with oral SR terbutaline. Study perios 1 week run in and 2 week treatment. No. of awakening free nights PEF 50% vs 27% terbutaline Salmeterol am PEF 351+/-109 l/min. PEF variation 6+/-% () vs 11+/-12% (terbutaline) Rescue decreased during daytime for group p=0.003 NS in evening PEF. PEF variation reduced in group p=0.01 p=0.04 for daytime NS difference in treatment groups at night to oral SR terbutaline 5mg bd, 50 m g bd causes a minimal increase in am and pm PEF, but did cause a significant improvement in nocturnal asthma control and improved sleep. 66% of patients on on corticosteroids and 11% oral steroil whil in the terbutaline group 67%

2 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 were on ICS 13% oral steroid. Crompton 2 1999 RCT ++ 118 patients aged 18-67 (mean 41). Nocturnal fall PEF and symptoms on 400 m g-2000m g or >=20mg oral steroids. with. Study period of 8 Increase in am PEF from baseline. pm PEF, % fall in PEF, No. of night time awakenings, % of nights with no awakening, No. of puffs of rescue medication, asthma symptoms 50 l/min 55 l/min All improved by both NS differences in treatment with any outcome measures In this short study, 20mg po nocte and 50 m g inh bd produced similar improvements in PEFR, nocturnal asthma symptoms and requirement for rescue medication in asthmatics using moderate doses of corticosteroids. Both were well tolerated with similar incidence of tremor, but treatment with was significantly cheaper. Gunn 3 1995 Crossover RCT + 152 patients aged 17-78 (mean 54 years) Nocturnal asthma symptoms 3/7 Severity of sleep disturbance (0-3) Increase in PEF Increase in FEV 1 Both reduced scores to <half baseline value. 42 l/min 53 l/min CR p<0.001 NS between p<0.0001 NS between Both and CR improved baselind lung function and

3 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 >=800 µg corticosteroid (no oral Increase in FVC steroids) 15% reversibility to b 2 agonists. vs CR over 6 0.10L 0.14L CR 0.16L CR p<0.01 NS between p<0.01ns between streaments reduced the sevirity of night time symptoms in asthmatics on moderate dose corticosteroids over this short study time. There was no significant difference in except that caused less tremor than CR Ringbaek 4 1996 Crossover RCT + 59 patients aged 19-73 (mean 47). Mean FEV, 64%pred. 26.6% reversibility to b 2 agonists. with oral CR. Study period 4 wkks and 2 washout. Increase in am PEF from baseline % days asymptomatic % days free from rescue b 2 agonist use. 35 l/min vs 19 l/min 28% vs 13% 38% vs 24% p=0.04 p=0.004 p=0.01 Salmeterol 50 mg bd was more effective than CR 8mg po bd at reducing day and night time symptoms and rescue b 2 agonist use. It was also better tolerated. This paper is only available in Danish, making methodological evaluation difficult. Wallaert 5 1999 RCT + 117 patients aged 20-70 (mean age 45). Nocturnal Increase in am/pm PEF from baseline. Nocturnal and 28 l/min / 20 l/min on, 29 l/min, 23 l/min on Bambuterol p<0.05 Salmeterol Bambuterol 20mg po nocte and 50 µg inh bd

4 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 fall in PEF daytime symptoms. and symptoms on 800 m Rescue b 2 g-2000m g agonist use. and/or >=20mg oral steorids per day. oral with. Study period of 6. Nocturnal awakenings reduced in both groups. Consumption of rescue at night was lower in both groups p<0.001/0.01 p<0.01 Bambuterol p<0.05 Salmeterol p<0.001 NS difference between improved asthma control and nocturnal symptoms to a similar degree with a similar side effect profile. Children Akpinarli 6 1999 Randomised, controlled trial and blind + 32 Asthmatic children (6-14 y) on ICS (400-800 mcg/d) and still symoptomatic. Formoterol 12 mcg or added to ICS for 6 1] symptom scores (0-9), composite of day/night cough, wheeze and shortness of breath. 2] beta 2 agonist use per week 3] FEV1 am/pm PEFR 4] PC20 to baseline Formoterol reduced score-3 Placebo reduced score 0 Formoterol reduced beta 2 agonist use by 3 and by 0 FEV1 (formoterol) + 3 Am PEFR 19 Formoterol 0.05 95% ci-7 to-2 95%ci-1 to 1 P<0.05 95%ci-6 to 2 95%ci-2 to 2 P<0.05 95%ci-23 to 29) 95%ci 2 to 181 p<0.05 95%ci 0.57 to 0.74 NS Formoterol reduced asthma symptoms and beta agonist use, increased PEFR 95% ci related to 6 compared with base line. P-values relate to comparison between formoterol and No adverse effects seen Verberne 7 1998 Double-blind, randomised, controlled ++ 177 asthma children (6-16y), mild to moderate, currently on 1] symptoms dyspnoea (0,1,2,3) am/pm wheeze (0,1,2,3)am/pm % children no symptoms during a 2 week period:bdp400+salm 34%, BDP800 39% and BDP400+ 35% 1) NS, at no time point were there sign, differences Found no additional benefit of adding to

5 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 BDP 400 mcg /d Study treatment was or BDP 800 mcg/d or 100mcg/d over a 12 month period cough(0,1,2,3)am/pm 2) rescue med. Use (pred. Courses) 3) lung function PEFR FEV1 PD20 3) BDP400+salm slightly better PEFR in first months change FEV1(BDP400+salm)=4.3% (BDP800)=5.8% (BDP400+)=4.3% No significant differenct between groups, all groups increased PD 20 compared to baseline in symptom scores 2) NS to baseline 95%ci (1.3, 7.2) 95%ci (2.9, 8.7) 95%ci (2.1, 1.3) NB. Between groups NS BDP 400 compared with adding or doubling the dose of BDP. At end of study, after stopping Salmeterol group noted a reduction in FEV1, this did not occur in other groups. Growth was significantly slower in BDP800 group. Byrnes 8 2000 Crossover RCT ++ 45 asthmatic children (5-14) on >400 mcg ICS and still symptomatic. Addition of 50 and 100 mcg each bd were compared with 200 mcg qds. Study period of 4. FEV 1, PEFR am/pm Histamine challenge, PC20 Symptom scores Use of rescue medication *compared with addition of am PEFR increased by 9.6 l/min and 13.8 l/min for 50 and 100 mcg Salmeterol 50 1.54 Salmeterol 100 1.23 Median daytime score reduced from 1 to 0 for all Days without rescue medication increased for all groups compared with baseline: 65%, 61% salme. 50 and 72% salmet.100 95% ci 95% ci 2.1 to 17 95% ci 6 to 21-5 p<0.05 ci 0.65 to 3.7 ci 0.55 to 2.78 NS between treatment groups No difference between the two doses (50/100) of. No, comparisons with baseline and. Salmeterol signigicantly improved PEFR over 4. Heuck 9 2000 Randomised double-blind, + primary 27 asthmatics, 6-13 y, whose objective asthma Secondary variables 1) symptoms to BUD 200 mcg BD at baseline Symptoms and lung function secondary

6 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 controlled crossover trial was currently study of controlled on bone BUD 200 mct BD. turnover. Treatment formoterol 12mcg+ BUD100 v BUD200 mcg BD over 2*6 week periods day/night (0-3 scores) 2) rescue med. Use 3) FEV1/FVC 1] Day p=0.55, 95%ci- 0.11,0.2 Night p=0.64,95%ci-0.1, 0.15 2] p=0.56, 95%ci-0.11, 0.2 Night p=0.64, 95%ci-0.1, 0.15 2] p=0.56, 95%ci 0.48, 0.27 puffs/d 3] PEV1 higher at week 2 (p=0.04, 95%ci 0.01, 0.17, NS at week 6 (p=0.32, 95%ci 0.02, 0.06 variables. BUD 100mcg BD + Formoterol as good as BUD 200mcg BDno loss of asthma control This intervention associated with better short term growth. Russell 10 1995 Randomised, controlled, double blind ++ 210 Symptomatic asthmatic children (4-16y) on ICS (> 400 mcg/d) treated with Salmeterol (50mcg Bd) or for 12 1] max. proportion symptom free days (%)/nights (%) 60%/81% 26%/59% 2] median change in rescue med use 0.7 and 0.8 at 9-12 for versus 0.3 for 30 mean am PEFR (percentage points] was > 8 above baseline for 4-12. Max. increase with was 5. Mean pm PEFR greater for than by at least 1 percentage point 1] max. proportion symptom free days (%)/nights (%) 60%/81% 26%/59% 2] median change in rescue med use 0.7 and 0.8 at 9-12 for versus 0.3 for 30 mean am PEFR (percentage points] was >8 above baseline for 4-12. Max. increase with was 5. Mean pm PEFR greater for than by at least 1 percentage point Comparison with P>0.05 P>0.05 P>0.05 P>0.05 only for first 4 Improvement was better for group at all times in 12 compared with

7 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 Langton Hewer 11 1995 RCT doubleblind Placebo controlled + 24 children, 1] Day/night 12 17 yrs symptoms PEFR on "high doxe" am/pm ICS (not 2] FEV1 (clinic) deferred) 50-1000mcg, medicine 400BD Received Salmeterol 100mcg BD or for 8 Salmeterol v 1] No stats given (wide range of values) this showed trend to improvement. 2] tend to improve Change from baseline significantly better for Change in am FEV1 +0.22 v s-0.2 () P< 0.05, 95%ci 0.65 to 0.12 Change in pm FEV1 + 0.2 v s 0.16 () P< 0.05, 95%c1 0.67-0.07 Tomac 12 1996 Cohort study + 24 asthmatic children (7-16) on ICS and/or DSC were treated with 50 mcg BD for 4. Comparisons made with 2 week run-in Rescue Daily/nocturnal symptoms am/pm PEFR FEV1, FVC Airways resistance Reduced on compared with run-in period Reduced by Am increased by 42 l/min, pm increased by 35 l/min No change in FEV1, MEF but FVC increased. sraw decreased by 26% P<0.02 P<0.05 P<0.001 NS for FVC P<0.05 Not an RCT, and includes concomitant medication theophylines and DSC. Difficult to interpret. 1. Brambilla C, Chastang C, Georges D, Bertin L. Salmeterol compared with slow-release terbutaline in nocturnal asthma. A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, sequential clinical trial. French Multicenter Study Group. Allergy 1994;49(6):421-6. 2. Crompton GK, Ayres JG, Basran G, Schiraldi G, Brusasco V, Eivindson A, et al. Comparison of oral and in patients with symptomatic asthma and using corticosteroids. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;159(3):824-8. 3. Gunn SD, Ayres JG, McConchie SM. Comparison of the efficacy, tolerability and patient acceptability of once-daily

8 of 8 09/05/2018, 11:41 tablets against twice-daily controlled release in nocturnal asthma. ACROBATICS Research Group. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995;48(1):23-8. 4. Ringbaek TJ, Soes-Petersen U, Christensen M, Iversen ET, Rasmussen FV. [Salmeterol improves the control of disease in patients with moderate asthma. A comparative study of 50 mg and depot tablets 8 mg, both administered twice daily] Danish. Ugeskr Laeger 1996;158(27):3940-3. 5. Wallaert B, Brun P, Ostinelli J, Murciano D, Champel F, Blaive B, et al. A comparison of two long-acting betaagonists, oral and, in the treatment of moderate to severe asthmatic patients with nocturnal symptoms. The French Bambuterol Study Group. Respir Med 1999;93(1):33-8. 6. Akpinarli A, Tuncer A, Saraclar Y, Sekerel BE, Kalayci O. Effect of formoterol on clinical parameters and lung functions in patients with bronchial asthma: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child 1999;81(1):45-8. 7. Verberne AA, Frost C, Duiverman EJ, Grol MH, Kerrebijn KF. Addition of versus doubling the dose of beclomethasone in children with asthma. The Dutch Asthma Study Group. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158(1):213-9. 8. Byrnes C, Shrewsbury S, Barnes PJ, Bush A. Salmeterol in paediatric asthma. Thorax 2000;55(9):780-4. 9. Heuck C, Heickendorff L, Wolthers OD. A randomised controlled trial of short term growth and collagen turnover in asthmatics treated with formoterol and budesonide. Arch Dis Child 2000;83(4):334-9. 10. Russell G, Williams DA, Weller P, Price JF. Salmeterol xinafoate in children on high dose steroids. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 1995;75(5):423-8. 11. Langton Hewer S, Hobbs J, French D, Lenney W. Pilgrim's progress: the effect of in older children with chronic severe asthma. Respir Med 1995;89(6):435-40. 12. Tomac N, Tuncer A, Saraclar Y, Adalioglu G. Efficacy of in the treatment of childhood asthma. Acta Paediatr Jpn 1996;38(5):489-94.