Serum C-reactive protein levels correlate with clinical response in patients treated with antibiotics for wound infections after spinal surgery

Similar documents
Monitoring of blood parameters following anterior cervical fusion

C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Orthopaedics

Su r g i c a l site infection is a significant complication

Late Infection of Spinal Instrumentation

Treatment Of Spondylodiscitis, Epidural Abscess And Spondylitis A Retrospective Study Of 20 Cases With Exclusion Of TB Cases

Spine Postoperative Infections: Risk Factors

In recent years, spinal fusion with instrumentation has

POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN OPERATED CASES OF PYOGENIC SPONDYLODISCITIS

Incidence of deep vein thrombosis after major spine surgeries with no mechanical or chemical prophylaxis

Balgrist Shoulder Course 2017

J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2016 Sep;23(3): Originally published online September 30, 2016;

Diskitis Joseph Junewick, MD FACR

Case Discussion: Post-implant infections & explant decision making

U.S. MARKET FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS

In the adult population, vertebral discitis and osteomyelitis. Posterior fixation without debridement for vertebral body osteomyelitis and discitis

Pyogenic spondylitis as a complication of ear piercing : Differentiating between spondylitis and discitis

Osteomieliti STEOMIE

Delayed Infrarenal Aortic Pseudoaneurysm Treated by Endovascular Stent Graft in Pyogenic Spondylitis

Surgical outcome of posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar lesions in rheumatoid arthritis

P-1 (Former P-1) Are pediatric patients on oral or intravenous steroids at an increased risk of developing septic arthritis?

For pyogenic spondylitis, conservative management

Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in the follow-up of children affected by acute osteomyelitis.

MR imaging is the preferred imaging method of diagnosing

Pathologic abnormality of the sternoclavicular joint (SCJ)

Original Date: October 2015 LUMBAR SPINAL FUSION FOR

Prolonged infection at the tibial bone tunnel after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Malnutrition: An independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications

The use of CRP within a clinical prediction algorithm for the differentiation of septic arthritis and transient synovitis in children

Vancomycin powder to reduce surgical site infection in spine surgery

Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with an autogenous iliac crest bone graft in the treatment of pyogenic spondylodiscitis

J Korean Soc Spine Surg 2014 Jun;21(2): Originally published online June 30, 2014;

Int J Clin Exp Med 2018;11(2): /ISSN: /IJCEM Yi Yang, Hao Liu, Yueming Song, Tao Li

Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation With or Without Posterolateral Fusion. Ahmed Zaater, MD, Alaa Azzazi, MD, Sameh Sakr, MD, and Ahmed Elsayed, MD

Artificial Disc Replacement, Cervical

Transpedicular Curettage and Drainage of Infective Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: Technique and Clinical Results

Systematic review Cervical artificial disc replacement versus fusion in the cervical spine: a systematic review (...)

PSOAS ABSCESS. Dr Noman Ullah Wazir

NIA Magellan 1 and Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Nebraska (BCBSNE) Spine Surgery Program Frequently Asked Questions

Cost-Effective Solutions to Prevent Orthopedic Infections

Title: Childhood osteomyelitis-incidence and differentiation from other acute onset musculoskeletal features in a population-based study

Musculoskeletal Management (MSK) Program Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ s) For Physicians

Artificial Disc Replacement, Cervical

Two Level Vertebral Osteomyelitis Without Spinal Epidural Abscess Secondary to Spinal and Epidural Anesthesia: Two Case

Nuclear medicine and Prosthetic Joint Infections

ProDisc-C versus fusion with Cervios chronos prosthesis in cervical degenerative disc disease: Is there a difference at 12 months?

Extended indications of percutaneous endoscopic lavage and drainage for the treatment of lumbar infectious spondylitis

Aetna Health Management HMO Products SouthEast Region (Including Arkansas) Medical and Non-Medical Approvals and Denials from 10/01/2017 to 12/31/2017

Stabilisation of the infected spine

5/11/2013. Financial Disclosure. Introduction. Introduction

JOSS. original article ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION. Data Source

Prosthetic intervertebral disc replacement in the cervical spine: Cost-effectiveness compared with cervical discectomy with or without vertebral

Medical Policy Original Effective Date: Revised Date: Page 1 of 11

INFECTION & INFLAMMATION IMAGING

Percutaneous Fluoroscopic Synovial Biopsy as a New Diagnostic Test for Periprosthetic Infection after Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Feasibility Study

Lumbar Disc Replacement FAQs

Interesting Case Series. Pyogenic (Suppurative) Flexor Tenosynovitis: Assessment and Management

Bone and prosthetic joint infections: what the ID specialist needs?

Rochester Patient Safety C. difficile Prevention Collaborative: Long Term Care Antimicrobial Stewardship (funded by NYSDOH)

Surgical Neurology International

Anterior Versus Posterior Fixation for the Treatment of Lumbar Pyogenic Vertebral Osteomyelitis

ConnectiCare Commercial & Exchange Members Utilization Review Matrix 2018 Spine Surgery, Implantable Infusion Pump Insertion & Other Spine Procedures

Original Article Management of Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Decompression Alone or Decompression and Fusion

A Surgeon s Perspective for the Primary Care Physician Stephen Curtin M.D. Tucson Orthopeadic Institute

Lumbar, cervical and thoracic spine surgery (open, closed or minimally invasive) Adult deformity surgery Implantable infusion pump insertion

Diagnosis and Treatment of Tuberclous Spondylitis and Pyogenic Spondylitis in Atypical Cases

Osteoarthrosis, unspecified whether generalized or localized, lower leg. Osteoarthrosis, localized, not specified whether primary or secondary, pelvic

Intraoperative case studies. Portable full body 32-slice CT scanner

Corporate Medical Policy

GENERAL Why did Harvard Pilgrim implement an MSK program and why is it expanding to include hip, knee, shoulder and spine surgeries?

Spinal Interventional Pain Management and Lumbar Spine Surgery

A rare case of spinal injury: bilateral facet dislocation without fracture at the lumbosacral joint

GENERAL Why did Tufts Health Plan implement a Spinal Conditions Management Program and why is it expanding to include joint surgeries?

Single-stage debridement and instrumentation for pyogenic spinal infections

Modifiable Risk Factors in Orthopaedic Infections

C LINICAL A RTICLE. Abstract

Long term prognosis of young adults after ACDF

Spinal infection. Outline ANATOMY 6/2/2017. Anatomy Pathogen

Topic: Percutaneous Axial Anterior Lumbar Fusion Date of Origin: June Section: Surgery Last Reviewed Date: June 2013

Types of bone/joint infections. Bone and Joint Infections. Septic Arthritis. Pathogenesis. Pathogenesis. Bacterial arthritis: predisposing factors

Comparative study on the effect of anterior and posterior decompression in the treatment of multi-segmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy

Predictors of Postoperative Infection in Spinal Deformity Surgery

Michael Stander, Pharm.D.

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation.

Unilateral percutaneous endoscopic debridement and drainage for lumbar infectious spondylitis

Dumbbell Shaped Thoracic Spine Cavernous Hemangioma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Pyogenic spinal infection can be thought of as a

Case Report: Arthroscopic Treatment of Psoas Abscess Concurrent with Septic Arthritis of the Hip Joint

Ross JS, Brant-Zawadzki M, et al. Diagnostic Imaging: Spine 2004; V-1-5. Greenspan A. Orthopedic Radiology: A Practical Approach 1997; V-19-3

ESPID New Bone and Joint Infection Guidelines

Notification of changes to AXA PPP Schedule of Procedures & Fees September 2017

received penicillin before admission, an organism was later grown from the bone at operation. The fifth patient (Case

Sacroiliac joint infection

Osteomyelitis Samir S. Shah, MD, MSCE

Surgical Management of Osteomyelitis & Infected Hardware. Michael L. Sganga, DPM Orthopedics New England Natick, MA

NEW DEFINITION FORMAT AND DIFFICULT VARIABLE DEFINITIONS

Case Report Rapidly Progressive Spontaneous Spinal Epidural Abscess

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Cost-effectiveness of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical spondylosis Angevine P D, Zivin J G, McCormick P C

Periprosthetic joint infection: are patients with multiple prosthetic joints at risk?

Transcription:

The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 311 315 Serum C-reactive protein levels correlate with clinical response in patients treated with antibiotics for wound infections after spinal surgery Mustafa H. Khan, MD a, Patrick N. Smith, MD a, Nalini Rao, MD b, William F. Donaldson, MD a, * a Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3741 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA b Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center 5750 Centre Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA Received 3 April 2005; accepted 29 July 2005 Abstract BACKGROUND CONTEXT: C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) have been used to diagnose postoperative infections after spinal surgery. However, it has not been demonstrated if resolution of the signs and symptoms of postoperative spinal wound infections in patients who are being treated with intravenous antibiotics correlates with these markers. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to determine if improvement of the signs and symptoms of postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery correlates with a decrease in serum CRP and ESR while intravenous antibiotics are administered. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. PATIENT SAMPLE: The study consisted of 21 patients (mean age 63.8 years; 13 female, 8 male) with postoperative wound infections after spinal surgery. They were studied for a minimum of 20 weeks. OUTCOME MEASURES: CRP and ESR were measured at the time of diagnosis and at serial time-points. METHODS: All patients received intravenous antibiotic therapy for 6 8 weeks. Patients were monitored for clinical signs and symptoms of infection such as fever, drainage, erythema, or a need for continued wound packing at 4, 7, and 20 weeks after being diagnosed with a wound infection. RESULTS: The average CRP for all 21 patients at time of diagnosis was 11.769.0 mg/dl (range 1.2 to 37.8 mg/dl). At the 4-week time-point, 16 patients ( early responders ) showed clinical improvement with no fevers, no wound drainage, no erythema, and no need for wound packing. The average CRP of this group at the 4-week time-point decreased to 0.360.5 mg/dl. In contrast, at the 4-week time-point five patients ( late responders ) still had signs and symptoms of infection (2 with continuing drainage requiring wound packing; 1 with vertebral osteomyelitis requiring irrigation and debridement; 2 with erythema without fevers). The average CRP for this group was still elevated at the 4-week time-point at 7.363.5 mg/dl. The CRP value difference was statistically significant between the two groups (p!.05). As treatment continued, at the 20-week time-point the average CRP of the late responders gradually decreased to 0.860.8 mg/dl, which was not statistically different from that of the early responders (average CRP50.661.1 mg/dl). All 21 patients had resolution of infection at the 20-week time-point. The ESR did not correlate well with clinical improvement. At time of diagnosis, the ESR of both early responders (average557.6627.6 mm/hr) and late responders (average564.0621.9 mm/hr) was elevated. It remained elevated for both groups from the beginning of the study to the end at all time-points. The final ESR at the 20-week time-point was not different between the early responders and late responders (average527.6622.3 mm/hr vs. 31.062.6 mm/hr, respectively; po.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CRP may be of value in following the treatment response to antibiotics in wound infections after spinal surgery. The ESR can remain elevated in the presence FDA device/drug status: not applicable. Nothing of value received from a commercial entity related to this manuscript. * Corresponding author. 3741 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1010, Pittsburgh, PA 15213. Tel.: (412) 605-3218; fax: (412) 687-3724. E-mail address: donaldsonwf@upmc.edu (W.F. Donaldson) 1529-9430/06/$ see front matter Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2005.07.006

312 M.H. Khan et al. / The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 311 315 of a normal CRP despite a resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of postoperative wound infection. Ó 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Keywords: Spine; Infection; C-reactive protein; Erythrocyte sedimentation rate Introduction Postoperative infection can be a serious complication of spinal surgery. Although counter-measures such as antiseptic techniques and antibiotic therapy have decreased their incidence, postoperative wound infections continue to be a problem for the patient and surgeon alike [1]. Early detection of such infections can be difficult because the signs and symptoms are often vague, nonspecific, and delayed. The physician has to rely on the clinical presentation and associated laboratory values such as leukocytosis with left-shift and a rise in acute-phase reactants for diagnosis. The rise in acute phase reactants such as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) has been successfully used as markers of infection after surgical procedures [2,3]. For example, data from total joint arthroplasty literature have demonstrated that increases in CRP value after the third postoperative day are highly suggestive of infection [4]. It is known that after uncomplicated spinal surgery CRP values rise sharply, reaching a peak value on the second postoperative day, followed by a rapid decline [5]. This spike in CRP levels is confined to a much shorter time period than other markers of inflammation, such as ESR, which may remain elevated for weeks. A second rise in the CRP value between postoperative days 4 7 has been shown to be a sensitive marker of infection after spinal surgery [5]. Interestingly, the same study showed that the peak CRP values after instrumented lumbar surgery are significantly higher than those after noninstrumented surgery. Because interleukins (IL) and tumor necrosis factora (TNF-a) are potent mediators of the inflammatory response [2], increased production of IL-1, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-a by inflammatory cells upon contact with metallic implants is believed to be the reason for higher levels of CRP seen after instrumented spinal surgery [5]. Although several studies in the literature have demonstrated that CRP can be used to diagnose postoperative spinal infections [5 7], we are not aware of any studies that have documented if serum CRP levels in patients with wound infection after spinal surgery correlate with the resolution or persistence of infection while antibiotic therapy is being administered. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to retrospectively study a cohort of patients clinically diagnosed with a postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery who were being treated with intravenous antibiotics. The CRP and ESR values were recorded at serial time-points. We wanted to find out if clinical improvement was accompanied by a decrease in CRP and ESR values. Materials and methods Data were collected through a retrospective chart review on 62 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with a postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery between 2000 and 2004. Forty-one patients who did not have postoperative serial CRP and ESR measurements or who did not have a minimum of 20-week follow-up data were excluded from the study. The final number of patients thus obtained was 21 (13 female, 8 male; average age 63.8 years; range 29 82). To minimize observer bias, at the beginning of this retrospective study the authors did not check to see whether or not the CRP or ESR values were elevated for these patients. The procedures included anterior cervical decompression and fusion (n52), thoracic/lumbar discectomy (n54), thoracic/lumbar instrumented fusion (n512), lumbar laminectomy (n52), and lumbar hemangioma resection with instrumented fusion (n51). The average duration between the index surgical procedure and a clinical diagnosis of postoperative infection was 26 days. A specialist from the Division of Infectious Diseases was consulted who followed each patient from time of diagnosis onwards. Seventeen patients underwent operative irrigation and debridement. Because of the retrospective nature of this study, the criteria for operative irrigation and debridement were not predetermined, and were made by the principal surgeons on a case-by-case basis. Fluctuance, persistent or purulent drainage were the most common indications for operative irrigation and debridement. Thirteen of the 17 patients had implanted metal hardware. Three of the 17 patients had deep infections whereas the rest had superficial infections. Intraoperative cultures were obtained, and the results of the intraoperative cultures were as follows: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (4 patients), Staphylococcus epidermidis (4 patients), gram-negative rods (3 patients), polymicrobial cultures (2 patients), and negative cultures (4 patients). The patient characteristics and results of all 21 patients are shown in Table 1. All patients received 6 to 8 weeks of intravenous antibiotics. Serial CRP and ESR values were measured at the time of diagnosis. The patients were seen in clinic for follow-up at 4, 7, and 20 weeks post-diagnosis, at which point CRP and ESR values were measured. Chart review was performed to see if patients had any signs or symptoms of wound infection at the various time-points, such as fever, erythema, drainage, or need for continued wound packing. Specifically, at the 4-week time-point each one of the patients was assigned to either a group that had a favorable response to antibiotic therapy

M.H. Khan et al. / The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 311 315 313 Table 1 Characteristics of all 21 patients included in the study Patient category Procedure Instrumentation/ Hardware I&D performed? Superficial vs. deep infection Organism Early responders (n516) Lumbar fusion Yes No d d Lumbar fusion Yes No d d ACDF Yes Yes Superficial Polymicrobial Lumbar laminectomy No No d d Lumber fusion Yes Yes Superficial Negative Lumber laminectomy No Yes Superficial Polymicrobial Lumbar hemangioma Yes Yes Deep GNR resection and fusion Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial MSSA ACDF Yes Yes Superficial Negative Discectomy No Yes Deep MSSA Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial Negative Discectomy No Yes Superficial GNR Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial Negative Late responders (n55) Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial MSSA Discectomy No Yes Deep SE Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial GNR Lumbar fusion Yes Yes Superficial MSSA Discectomy No No d d MSSA5methicillin sensitive staphylococcus aureus, SE5staphylococcus epidermidis, GNR5gram-negative rods, I&D5irrigation and debridement. (ie, absence of the aforementioned signs and symptoms of wound infection) or to a group that did not have a favorable response to antibiotic therapy (ie, persistent signs and symptoms of wound infection). Once this assignment was made based on the clinical response, then the CRP and ESR values were examined for each patient. Results The average CRP of all 21 patients at the time of clinical diagnosis of a wound infection was 11.769.0 mg/dl (range 1.2 to 37.8 mg/dl; normal!1.2 mg/dl). Figure 1 shows the changes in CRP with time. At the 4-week time-point 16 patients (henceforth referred to as early responders ) had shown clinical improvement with no fevers, no wound drainage, no erythema, and no need for wound packing. We defined these patients as having a favorable response to antibiotic therapy. The average CRP of this group at time of diagnosis was 11.569.1 mg/dl, which decreased to 0.360.5 mg/dl at the 4-week time-point. The other five patients (henceforth referred to as late responders ) were still symptomatic at the 4-week time-point. Unlike the early responder group, these patients had one or more clinical signs or symptoms of continued infection (ie, fever, wound drainage, erythema, need for wound packing). This group consisted of three patients who underwent lumbar Fig. 1. Values of C-reactive protein (CRP) (6SD) versus time for early responders (ER; n516) and late responders (LR; n55). Unlike the late responder group, the early responder group had a rapid resolution of clinical signs and symptoms of infection, which was accompanied by a rapid normalization of C-reactive protein. *p!.05.

314 M.H. Khan et al. / The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 311 315 instrumented fusion and two patients who underwent thoracic/lumbar discectomy. In this group, one patient developed vertebral osteomyelitis requiring an irrigation and debridement (CRP 9.1), two patients had continued drainage requiring wound packing (CRP 12.0 mg/dl, 2.9 mg/ dl), and two had persistent erythema but without fevers (CRP 7.4 mg/dl, 5.0 mg/dl). The average CRP of the late responders at time of diagnosis was 12.569.8 mg/dl, which decreased to 7.363.5 mg/dl at the 4-week timepoint. At the 4-week time-point the CRP difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p!.05). By week 20, the CRP values of both early responders and late responders had normalized to 0.661.1 mg/dl and 0.860.8 mg/dl respectively (po.05), and they had no clinical signs and symptoms of a wound infection. Figure 2 shows the corresponding ESR values. At time of diagnosis, the ESR of both early responders (average557.6627.6 mm/hr) and late responders (average564.0621.9 mm/hr) was elevated. At the 4-week timepoint, the average ESR for the 16 early responders was 48.6629.3 mm/hr, whereas the average ESR of the 5 late responders was 42.3611.6 mm/hr (po.05). At the 20-week time-point, the ESR of the early responders had decreased to 27.6622.3 mm/hr while that of the late responders had decreased to 31.062.6 mm/hr, but there was no statistical difference between the two groups (po.05). Discussion Tillett and Francis first described CRP in 1930 in patients being treated for pneumococcal pneumonia [8]. It was named as such because of its ability to react to the C-polysaccharide component of the pneumococcal wall. CRP is secreted by the liver in response to a variety of inflammatory cytokines, particularly IL-6, after trauma, inflammation, or infection [9]. CRP acts as a pattern Fig. 2. Values of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (6SD) versus time for early responders (ER; n516) and late responders (LR; n55). The erythrocyte sedimentation rate was not statistically different between the two groups at any time-point. recognition molecule to activate the adaptive immune response via the innate immune system. Several authors have studied CRP as a potential diagnostic tool for postoperative infection after spinal surgery. A prospective study of 89 patients who underwent uncomplicated spinal surgery (lumbar microdiscectomy, conventional lumbar discectomy, anterior lumbar fusion, posterolateral interbody fusion) showed that CRP rises within the first two postoperative days and then sharply declines [10]. These findings were supported by another study of 89 patients who underwent spinal surgery which demonstrated that CRP reaches a peak level on the second postoperative day and then rapidly decreases [11]. Additionally, both these reports commented that the postoperative rise in ESR is more irregular and unpredictable, and that the ESR can remain elevated for up to several weeks postoperatively even in the absence of any infectious complications [10,11]. Because there were no cases of infections in the two aforementioned studies, the authors were only able to speculate that CRP was likely to be a more sensitive diagnostic marker of postoperative infection. This hypothesis was shown to be correct by Rosahl et al. who prospectively studied 51 patients undergoing anterior cervical fusion [6]. The authors found that CRP is indeed superior to ESR for early detection of postoperative infection. Meyer et al., who prospectively studied 400 patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy, came to a similar conclusion [7]. The investigators concluded that CRP was 100% sensitive and 95% specific in detecting postoperative infections. However, there were only nine cases of surgery-related wound infections, and the CRP was not measured after postoperative day 5. Therefore, these studies were not able to comment if clinical improvement of wound infections was correlated with a decrease in CRP. Schulitz and Assheuer studied 31 patients prospectively who underwent one-level discectomy and showed that postoperative CRP elevation was correlated with an infection [12]. In another prospective study of 73 patients undergoing instrumented or noninstrumented spine surgery, Takahashi et al. showed that although both types of patients reached a peak CRP value on the second postoperative day, the peak is much higher in the instrumented group compared with the noninstrumented group [5]. There were three cases of postoperative infections (all with instrumentation), and they all had a second rise in CRP between postoperative days 4 7. The authors concluded that a second rise in the immediate postoperative period of the CRP value was strongly indicative of an infection. Therefore, the bulk of the current literature seems to indicate that CRP is much more sensitive and specific than ESR in the diagnosis of postoperative infection after spinal surgery. Even though the aforementioned studies have demonstrated the usefulness and validity of CRP as an aid in establishing a diagnosis of postoperative infection after spinal surgery, the question posed in the present study was different; namely, whether or not CRP and ESR values

M.H. Khan et al. / The Spine Journal 6 (2006) 311 315 315 in patients with postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery, who are being treated with intravenous antibiotics, correlate with clinical improvement. Our study differs from previous studies because we first made a diagnosis of postoperative infection clinically and then measured and subsequently monitored serial CRP and ESR values at specific time-points while antibiotic treatment was being administered. CRP and ESR were used not just as diagnostic tools, but also as potential objective markers of wound infection resolution. It is interesting to note that simply administering antibiotics in the absence of an infection has no effect on CRP values [13]. Therefore, our study suggests that while antibiotic treatment is being undertaken, a persistently elevated CRP value indicates an active, persistent infection, whereas a declining/normalizing CRP indicates a resolving infection. There is support for this hypothesis in the literature. A study of 16 patients with pyogenic discitis demonstrated that radiographic improvement of paravertebral/ epidural abscesses using magnetic resonance imaging was correlated with a decrease in serum CRP levels [14]. However, the aforementioned study included patients with pyogenic discitis only, not those with postoperative wound infections after spinal surgery. In the current study, 16 of the 21 patients had clinical improvement within the first 4 weeks of antibiotic treatment. In those same 16 patients, the CRP values declined dramatically. On the other hand, the ESR had a wide degree of variability and did not show a rapid decrease. This variability in the ESR is in agreement with other studies in the literature [7,10,11]. Therefore, we propose that CRP is a better marker than ESR for following the course of postoperative wound infections after spinal surgery in patients being treated with intravenous antibiotics, and that CRP may be useful for guiding antibiotic therapy. The strength of this study is that it attempts to provide an objective laboratory marker for monitoring a specific clinical process, namely postoperative wound infection after spinal surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first report to specifically address this question. We suggest that the surgeon and the infectious disease specialist can serially follow the CRP values of patients diagnosed with postoperative wound infections while antibiotics are being administered. Measuring CRP is a convenient, readily available, and inexpensive test. There are some limitations to our study. The first and most obvious is that it consists of a relatively small number of patients who were studied retrospectively. Also, because all of our patients had a favorable clinical response to treatment at the end of the study period, it remains to be seen how the CRP values of persistently poor responders change with time. We are mindful of the fact that the patient sample studied in this report was heterogeneous, because it consisted of patients with several different types of bacterial organisms. Prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to address these issues. Conclusion Based on this small retrospective study, serial CRP level measurement may be helpful in monitoring the treatment of postoperative wound infections after spinal surgery. However, ESR does not appear to be a sensitive marker of infection resolution. References [1] Weisz R, Errico T. Spinal infections: diagnosis and treatment. Bull Hosp Joint Dis 2000;59:40 6. [2] Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:448 54. [3] Mustard RA Jr, Bohnen JMA, Haseeb S, Kasina R. C-reactive protein levels predict postoperative septic complications. Arch Surg 1987;122: 69 73. [4] White J, Kelly M, Dunsmuir R. C-reactive protein level after total hip and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998;80:909 11. [5] Takahashi J, Ebara S, Kamimura M, et al. Early-phase enhanced inflammatory reaction after spinal instrumentation surgery. Spine 2001; 26:1698 704. [6] Rosahl SK, Gharabaghi A, Zink PM, Samii M. Monitoring of blood parameters following anterior cervical fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2000;92:169 74. [7] Meyer B, Schaller K, Rohde V, Hassler W. The C-reactive protein for detection for early infections after lumbar microdiscectomy. Acta Neurochir 1995;136:145 50. [8] Tillett W, Francis T Jr. Serological reactions in pneumonia with a non-protein fraction of pneumococcus. J Exp Med 1930;52:561 71. [9] Volanakis JE. Human C-reactive protein: expression, structure and function. Molec Immunol 2001;38(2 3):189 97. [10] Larsson S, Thelander U, Friberg S. C-reactive protein levels after elective orthopedic surgery. Clin Orthop 1992;275:237 42. [11] Thelander U, Larsson S. Quantitation of C-reactive protein levels and erythrocyte sedimentation rate after spinal surgery. Spine 1992;17: 400 4. [12] Schulitz KP, Assheuer J. Discitis after procedures on the intervertebral disc. Spine 1994;19:1172 7. [13] Stahl WM. Acute phase protein response to tissue injury. Crit Care Med 1987;15:545 50. [14] Veillard E, Guggenbuhl P, Morcet N, et al. Prompt regression of paravertebral and epidural abscesses in patients with pyogenic discitis: sixteen cases evaluated using magnetic resonance imaging. Joint Bone Spine 2000;67:219 27.