How Do You Like Your PrEP?

Similar documents
HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

PrEP efficacy the evidence

The Role of TAF in PrEP. Dr. Garrett has nothing to disclose

The HPTN Scholars Program:

Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV Prevention

WHO s early release guidelines on PrEP: implications for emtct. Dominika Seidman, MD October 13, 2015

PrEP in young African women: Rationale & lessons from HPTN 082

Moving beyond condoms to prevent HIV transmission. Are you Prepared for HIV PrEP?

Patterns and Correlates of PrEP Drug Detection among MSM and Transgender Women in the Global iprex Study

Clinical Infectious Diseases MAJOR ARTICLE

Antiretroviral Drugs for HIV Seronegative People: It works in trials, what about the real world?

IAPAC Summit Daily And Intermittent PrEP

HIV Prevention among Women

A Sub-Study Comparing Acceptability and Adherence of Daily or Non-Daily Pre-Exposure Regimens Between Young and Older South African Women

Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases Professor of Medicine Weill Medical College of Cornell University New York City

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP)

Review of planned trials and key emerging issues for Thailand

PrEP Dosing Strategies

ART and Prevention: What do we know?

Pre-exposure prophylaxis : Systemic and topical. Linda-Gail Bekker The Desmond Tutu HIV Centre UCT SA HIV ClniciansSociety Conference 2012

MTN 034/IPM 045: REACH Rings and PrEP in Young Women

Supplementary Material Table 5. Ongoing PrEP studies among young key population, young people, and key populations. Age range. Study name and location

PrEP in young African women: Rationale & lessons from HPTN 082 (and other studiesp

IMPAACT Pregnant Woman by Cuth. Different Pieces of the Puzzle Lynda Stranix-Chibanda for the protocol team 25 September 2018, Cape Town

Pre-exposure Prophylaxis. Robert M Grant October 2014

Update on Biomedical Prevention. Thomas C. Quinn, MD, MSc

Novel HIV Prevention Methods for Women

10/05/2016. PrEP : from proof of concept to real life. E. CUA Nice university hospital

PrEP for HIV prevention. Pep Coll AIDS Research Institute-IrsiCaixa Fight AIDS Foundation BCN Checkpoint

The Science behind Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Yunus Moosa Department of Infectious Diseases UKZN

Adolescent PrEP Delivery: Strategies and Tools to Maximize Adherence Young Women in Africa. Jessica Haberer, MD, MS November 9, 2017

The role of Integrase Inhibitors during HIV prevention

IAS 2015 Report Back. Disclosures

Update on PrEP BREACH SYMPOSIUM ANDERLECHT, 24 NOVEMBER Bea Vuylsteke, MD PhD Unit HIV & Sexual Health

11/7/2016. Jeanne M. Marrazzo, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham, Alabama

Biomedical Prevention Update Thomas C. Quinn, M.D.

The Feasibility of HIV Prevention Cohort Studies among Men who have Sex with Men (MSM) in sub-saharan Africa

Disclosure. Learning Objectives. Epidemiology. Transmission. Risk of Transmission PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS (PREP) FOR HIV PREVENTION 50,000.

PrEP: Pre Exposure Prophylaxis

Antiretroviral Pharmacology for PrEP: Enhancing RCT Understanding with Small Intensive Studies

Interventions to improve PrEP and ART uptake and adherence among adolescent girls and young women. Jessica Haberer, MD, MS 26 April 2018

PEP and PREP. Dr David Hawkins Chelsea and Westminster Hospital

Tuesday, March 1, 2011; 12:15 p.m. EST Pedro Goicochea: (415)

ETHICS IN HIV PREVENTION RESEARCH IN THE NEW ERA OF

Dominic Chow, MD, PhD, MPH, Hawaii Center for AIDS Kunane Dreier, Prevention, Life Foundation Kekoa Kealoha, Hawaii Island HIV/AIDS Foundation Alexis

Pharmacologic Monitoring for Adherence and the role of a Clinical Pharmacology Laboratory

PrEP: State of the ART

FHI Study 10015: FEM-PrEP

Case Studies in PrEP Management. Kevin L. Ard, MD, MPH Massachusetts General Hospital, National LGBT Health Education Center April 15, 2016

Update on ARV based PrEP

PrEP and Behavioral Strategies for HIV Prevention. Douglas Krakower, MD January 30, 2014

ATN 110: An HIV PrEP Demonstration Project and Phase II Safety Study for Young Men who Have Sex with Men in the United States

Combination prevention: Public health and human rights imperatives

Using anti-hiv drugs for prevention

Pharmacology Considerations for HIV Prevention

Getting to Zero in San Francisco Consortium. Zero new HIV infections Zero HIV deaths Zero stigma and discrimination

Overview of ARV-based prevention trials

PREPARING FOR PREP: FROM KEY POPULATIONS THEORY TO PRACTICE. Dr Oscar Radebe

UK community perspective on PrEP and PROUD. Simon Collins

HIV Prevention Strategies HIV Pre-exposure prophylaxis

Understanding the Results of VOICE

Pre exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP): Stepping Up HIV Prevention

Where are we going after effectiveness studies?

PrEP for Women: HIV Prevention in Family Planning Settings

Getting Prepped for PrEP. Ken Ho, MD, MPH World AIDS Day

Welcome and State of the Network. Cape Town, South Africa 27 th September 2016

PrEP Integration into Primary Care

MTN-001 Phase 2 Adherence and Pharmacokinetic Study of Oral and Vaginal Preparations of Tenofovir

What We Will Learn From the REACH Study

HIV PREP THE NEWEST TOOL IN THE BOX

The Evidence Base for Women

Psychosocial Issues in ART and HIV Prevention. Steven A. Safren, PhD

Treatment as Prevention in India: What will it take?

MTN-020. Jared Baeten, MD PhD Thesla Palanee, PhD On behalf of the ASPIRE team MTN Annual Meeting, Bethesda 21 February 2012

HIV & Condomless Sex - What is the Risk? Why Not? Alan J. Taege, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Department of Infectious Disease Cleveland Clinic

CONTINUED LESSONS FROM VOICE

HIV. The Role of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for the Prevention of HIV. Brief History of HIV AIDS. Global HIV Infection.

Engaging a Hidden Population to Stop HIV

HIV Prevention: 2010

Estimated onset and duration of PrEP activity for daily TDF/FTC using the EC 90 from iprex

HIV and Women. HIV Health Services Planning Council February 22, 2016

What s in the Biomedical Prevention Pipeline

HHS Public Access Author manuscript J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2017 August 01.

Pros and Cons of on demand PrEP «Pros» Laurent COTTE, MD Infectious Diseases Department Croix-Rousse Hospital, Lyon - France

Clinical Education Initiative PRE-EXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS. Speaker: Antonia Urbina, MD

Advances in Topical Protection Against HIV-1 Infection. Ross D. Cranston MB ChB MD FRCP Fundació Lluita contra la SIDA Barcelona

Oral Versus Injectable Delivery, Impact on Adherence/Tolerability

HPTN 061: The Brothers Study

Behavioral Research in the Microbicide Trials Network

Combination HIV Prevention Research Carl W. Dieffenbach, Ph.D.

Using PrEP as Harm Reduction. Iman Little, MPH Team Lead, Preventative Services Chicago Center for HIV Elimination

The Positive Life Workshop

Multiple choice questions: ANSWERS

Acceptability of HPTN 077. The George Washington University HPTN Clinical Research Site 16 June 2016

Evolving HIV Treatment Paradigms What we need to know

Does Pharmacology Support Topical PrEP?

REVIEW OF PREP GUIDELINES: A PRIMER FOR THE PRIMARY CARE PRACTITIONER ANTONIO E. URBINA, MD. PrEP Webinar Series

11/8/2016. Moving Beyond Truvada: The (Current) Future Pipeline for PrEP. Prevention Modalities

ART for HIV Prevention:

Transcription:

How Do You Like Your PrEP? Results from the HPTN 067/ADAPT Study Presented by Robert Grant, MD, MPH on behalf of the HPTN 067/ADAPT Study Team

Background Oral FTC/TDF PrEP is effective for preventing HIV acquisition. 1 Full protection after rectal exposure with use of 4+ tabs/week. 2 Full protection after vaginal exposure likely requires more PrEP use. 3 Sex is often planned, and plans change over time. 4 PrEP provides benefit when used during seasons of risk. 5 Such strategic PrEP use has been observed in MSM. 2 Measurement of adherence is challenging, especially when dynamic. 6 Recommending PrEP dosing before and after sex was effective among MSM. 7 Study Premise: Adapting PrEP regimens to match patterns of sex could increase strategic PrEP use and minimize medication costs and side effects. 1. Grant NEJM 2010, Baeten NEJM 2012, Thigpen NEJM 2012, Choopanya Lancet 2013; 2. Grant Lancet Infec. Dis. 2014, Liu JAMA Int. Med. 2015; 3. Grant AIDS 2015, Cottrell JID 2016; 4. van Griensven JIAS 2010, 5. Hojilla AIDS and Behavior 2015, Grant Lancet 2016 6. Mutua PLoS One 2012, Kibengo PLoS One 2013; 7. Molina NEJM 2015.

HPTN 067 Design FTC/TDF D Daily- One tablet/day Time driven- 1 tablet/2x week with a post sex boost Event driven- 1 tablet pre-sex and 1 tablet post-sex No more than 2 tablets daily or 7 tablets/week Women (incl. TGW) & MSM 6 weeks DOT period Randomized T 24 weeks self-administered dosing 4 weeks off drug Final Study Visit Week 34 E PrEP use and sex Key informant interviews and focus groups

Harlem Prevention Center 179 HIV-uninfected at risk MSM/TGW NYC (Harlem), USA Completed Dec 2014 Silom Community Clinic 178 HIV-uninfected at risk MSM/TGW Bangkok, Thailand Completed March 2014 Emavundleni 178 HIV-uninfected at risk WSM Cape Town, South Africa Completed June 2013

Definition: Coverage Coverage of sex events for all arms: >1 pill taken in the 4 days before sex >1 pill taken in the 24 hours after sex Sex >1 tablet >1 tablet Bekker IAS2015, Vancouver, 2015

Coverage of Sex Events MSM/TGW in Bangkok 100% 90% 80% 70% 85% 84% 74% Daily Time-driven Event-driven 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% % complete coverage 11% 12% 19% % only pre-sex dose 1% 3% 5% 3% 1% 3% % only post-sex dose no coverage Daily/Time p = 0.79, Daily/Event p = 0.02, Time/Event p = 0.04, global p = 0.19 Holtz, IAS 2015, Vancouver

Tenofovir diphosphate in PBMCs: % with TFVDP >= 5.2 fmol/10 6 cells* Bangkok MSM/TGW Participants who report sex in last 7 days with detectable TFVDP in PBMC (>=5.2 fmol/10^6 cells) Daily (D) Time-driven (T) Event-driven (E) Week 10 31/31 (100%) 29/29 (100%) 30/30 (100%) Week 18 28/29 (96.6%) 30/30 (100%) 24/26 (92.3%) Week 30 22/23 (95.7%) 18/19 (94.7%) 13/14 (92.9%) *Indicative of at least 2 tablets per week. Time/Daily p = 0.60, Event/Daily p = 0.51, Time/Event p=0.28

FTC/TDF Pills by Arm MSM/TGW in BKK HPTN 067/ADAPT 9420 8285 Required tablets Tablets reported taken Number of tablets 4121 3713 1928 2157 Daily Time-driven Event-driven Required tablets: p < 0.001 for all comparisons (D/T, D/E, and T/E) Tablets actually taken: p < 0.001 for all comparisons (D/T, D/E, and T/E)

Neuro and GI Symptoms / Side Effects MSM/TGW in Bangkok HPTN 067/ADAPT Side Effect reported on Structured Interview Daily Time Event p value % PPTs who experienced any neurologic side effects % PPTs who experienced any GI side effects 48% 46% 54% 0.64 45% 34% 41% 0.46

Coverage of Sex Events Women in Cape Town 100% 90% 80% 70% 75% Daily Time-driven Event-driven 60% 50% 56% 52% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 33% 30% 21% 9% 8% 1% 3% 5% 7% % complete coverage %only pre-sex dose %only post-sex dose no coverage Sex event defined as vaginal or anal intercourse Time/Daily p = 0.0007, Event/Daily p < 0.0001, Time/Event p = 0.43 Bekker IAS2015, Vancouver, 2015

TFVDF in PBMCs: % with TFVDP >= 5.2 fmol/10 6 cells PBMC* - Cape Town Participants who report sex in last 7 days with detectable TFV-DP in PBMC (>=5.2 fmol/10^6 cells) Daily (D) Time-driven (T) Event-driven (E) Week 10 33/40 (82.5%) 16/23 (69.6%) 25/37 (67.6%) Week 18 29/39 (74.4%) 16/25 (64.0%) 10/30 (33.3%) Week 30 19/29 (65.5%) 13/24 (54.2%) 12/31 (38.7%) *Indicative of at least 2 tablets per week. Time/Daily p = 0.16, Event/Daily p = 0.002, Time/Event p=0.13

Coverage of Sex Events MSM/TGW in NYC 100% 90% 80% 70% 66% Daily Time-driven Event-driven 60% 50% 47% 52% 40% 30% 24% 30% 29% 20% 10% 0% % complete coverage % only pre-sex dose 2% 8% 6% % only post-sex dose 8% 15% no coverage 13% Time/Daily and Event/Daily p = 0.01; Time/Event p =0.47 Mannheimer, IAS 2015, Vancouver

TFVDF in DBS: % with TFVDP >= 326 FMOLE/punch DBS* - Harlem Participants who report sex in last 7 days with detectable TFV-DP in DBS (>=326 fmole/punch) Daily (D) Time-driven (T) Event-driven (E) Week 10 13/23 (56.5%) 8/23 (34.8%) 5/27 (18.5%) Week 18 11/27 (40.7%) 10/27 (37.0%) 3/21 (14.3%) Week 30 9/18 (50.0%) 3/18 (16.7%) 3/18 (16.7%) *Indicative of at least 2 tablets per week. Time/Daily p = 0.11, Event/Daily p = 0.004, Time/Event p=0.13

Qualitative Methods Cape Town 178 women participants 59 qualitative participants Average age 26, range 18-44 On self-administered PrEP for 24 weeks Qualitative data collected within 3-months of final study visit 41 FG participants 16 Daily arm 12 Time-driven arm 13 Event-driven arm 18 IDI participants 6 Daily arm 6 Time-driven arm 6 Event-driven arm Amico, Mutuality Model, AIDS and Behavior, in press

Distrust Uncertainty Alignment Mutuality Different Questions About PrEP Whatever What? How? Now! Build Trust For Disclosure Different Goals for the Care Team Support Exploration With Information Identify Barriers & Facilitators & Build Skills Let Her Lead Adapted from Amico, Mutuality Model, AIDS and Behavior, in press

Conclusions Adherence to oral PrEP is feasible in diverse groups. A recommendation for daily PrEP dosing led to Highest coverage, Highest adherence, Highest PrEP drug concentrations, Higher pill burden. Time-driven dosing led to Comparable PrEP coverage in Bangkok MSM. Health care strategies should be adapted to the level of engagement on the mutuality spectrum.

Limitations and Next Steps Participants were informed that daily dosing was proven to be effective, and that non-daily dosing was unproven. This information likely undermined motivation to use non-daily regimens. Insights to guide when to start and stop PrEP are emerging from clinical practice. Active surveillance of PrEP seroconversions would provide more information about dosing strategies and outcomes.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The HIV Prevention Trials Network is sponsored by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute on Drug Abuse, all components of the U.S. National Institutes of Health. The HPTN 067/ADAPT Study Team acknowledges key support and contributions of the following: HPTN 067 Participants and the men and women they represent Team members at Emavundleni, Silom Clinic and the Harlem Prevention Center. HPTN 067 Protocol Team (including those at LC, LOC, SDMC, PAB and DAIDS)