Clinical Pathways in the Oncology Care Model

Similar documents
Oncology Care Model Overview

MIPS Improvement Activities: Building Blocks for Value and Quality Care

OC TOBER 19, Quality Payment Program Overview

Patient-Centered Oncology Payment: Payment Reform to Support Higher Quality, More Affordable Cancer Care (PCOP)

2014 Oncology Measures Group Overview

Oncology Management at HAP. John Calabria, DO, Medical Director

The Oncology Care Model: What Is It? Implications for IOD? Ronald Barkley, MS, JD Alti Rahman, MHA, MBA October 28, 2016

Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS): Cost Measure Field Test Reports Fact Sheet

Physician Organization of Michigan ACO. Presented by Jeni Hughes Oakland Southfield Physicians, PC

This presentation was current at the time it was published or uploaded onto the web. Medicare and commercial payers change their policies frequently.

Member-centered cancer care In Georgia

Aligning Incentives: Quality of Care Initiatives and Precision Medicine

Affordable Care Act Creates MSSP and ACOs

2014 Medicare (and Private Insurance) Payment Reform for Oncology. Ensuring the Delivery of Quality & Value-Based Cancer Care

June 27, Submitted electronically

Billing and Payment Models for Palliative Care

Quality Payment Program: A Closer Look at the Proposed Rule for Year 3

Precise Disease Classification Optimizes Bundled Payments. Session #99, March 7, 2018 Stuart Goldberg MD and Andrew Pecora MD

2017 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Proposed Rule Summary

Impact of WRVU Changes. Allowed Charges (Millions)

CANCER LEADERSHIP COUNCIL

HIGHLIGHTS OF THE 2017 PROPOSED MEDICARE PHYSICIAN FEE SCHEDULE RULE

MACRA Roadmap: An Overview of the Quality Payment Program in Suzanne Falk, MPP Senior Associate, Regulatory Affairs

The Changing Landscape of Palliative Care

The Future of Cardiac Care: Managing Our Patients Together

The New Role of Cancer Patient Engagement in Value Based Models

MIPS FOR PPRNET MEMBERS A PRIMER AND WHAT YOUR PRACTICE NEEDS TO KNOW

WELLPOINT RESPONDS TO ANCO s COMMENTS

Advancing Care Coordination through Episode Payment Models (EPMs): Summary of the Proposed Rule

Assessing the Potential Revenue Impact to Oncology Practices under a Cancer Drug Therapy Bundled Reimbursement Model

BETTER WAYS TO PAY FOR CANCER CARE Creating Win-Win-Win Approaches for Oncologists, Cancer Patients, and Payers

COMMUNITY ONCOLOGY ALLIANCE YOU WON T BELIEVE WHAT CMS WILL BE REPORTING ON YOUR ONCOLOGISTS

Quality Metrics & Immunizations

NQF Serious Illness Initiative Quality Measurement Committee

MERIT-BASED INCENTIVE PAYMENT SYSTEM (MIPS) QUALITY CATEGORY

Submitted to: Re: Comments on CMS Proposals for Patient Condition Groups and Care Episode Groups

Re: Episode-Based Cost Measure Development for the Quality Payment Program

Understanding Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCC)

Meaningful Use Overview

What To Know Before You Submit 2018 MIPS Data?

Mini Summit 4: Risk Adjustment: Adequate for Specialty Medications in Global Bundled Payment

MIPS Made Easy with TheraOffice. Nick Austin, Director of Product Management

MACRA Quality Payment Program Guide. Sample page. Simplifying Medicare MIPS & APM reporting for practitioners. Power up your coding optum360coding.

RE: Draft CMS Quality Measure Development Plan: Supporting the Transition to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System and Alternative Payment Models

Quality Innovation Network - Quality Improvement Organization Adult Immunization Task. May 14, Agenda

Cancer Center Dashboard

Innovative Opportunities for Pharmacists in the Evolving World of Healthcare

PREVENTATIVE COMMUNITY PHARMACY DIABETES MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS BROOKE HUDSPETH, PHARMD, CDE, MLDE KROGER DIABETES CARE

REVIEW AND FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQ) 8/5/2015. Outline. Navigating the DSMT Reimbursement Maze in Todays Changing Environment

MIPS in Jeffrey D. Lehrman, DPM, FASPS, FACFAS, MAPWCA

Aligning for Ambulatory Clinical Excellence at Providence St. Joseph Health

Zachary Edgar JD, LLM

Diagnosis Coding is About to be Much More Important. Matthew Menendez

How Does the Treatment and Management of Diabetes Fit Within the Scope of Reimbursements & Policy? NOVEMBER 17, 2017 JANELLE ALI-DINAR, PHD

A Physician-Senator s Look into the Crystal Ball of Healthcare Reform

Medicaid Care Management: The Advanced Medical Home (AMH) Program OB Care Management (OBCM) Care Coordination for Children (CC4C) March 2018

2015 Public Outcomes Report Cancer Program Practice Profile Reports 2013 Breast and Colon Cancer

Trends in Oncology: Preparing for Seismic Change. ASCO s Clinical Affairs Department

GUIDE TO PROGRAM DESIGN

3/17/2017. Innovative Opportunities for Pharmacists in the Evolving World of Healthcare. Elderly represent about of our emergency medical services:

Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. Reminder:

Renal Physicians Association s Kidney Quality Improvement Registry

Re: Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies under the Physician Fee Schedule and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2016

Patient-Centered Medical Homes and Community-Based Organizations: Partnerships to Improve Population Health Innovative Programs for Integrated Care

2014 Physician Quality Reporting System Data Collection Form: Oncology (for patients aged 18 and older)

Payment Innovation and Health Center Dental Programs: Case Studies from Three States

Making your Measurement Matter: How Hospice and Palliative Care Answered the Call

Exploring approaches for value-based reimbursement of oncology therapies October 3, 2017 Washington, DC

PA Optometric Association Annual Congress

Innovations in the Carolinas. Janet Bull, MD, MBA Four Seasons, CMO, CIO

Mercy Diabetes Prevention Program

To Bundle or Not to Bundle?

Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs

2015 Patient Outcomes Report

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

How to Integrate Peer Support & Navigation into Care Delivery

Statement Of. The National Association of Chain Drug Stores. For. U.S. Senate Finance Committee. Hearing on:

Colorado State Innovation Model (SIM) Clinical Quality Measures (CQMs) Reporting Schedules

MIPS Quick Guide. Merit-Based Incentive Payment System FAQs, Brought to You by TCI SuperCoder s MIPS Manager

WIN-WIN-WIN APPROACHES TO ACCOUNTABLE CARE How Better Payment for Hospice and Palliative Care Can Benefit Providers, Patients, and Payers

Atrius Health Pioneer ACO: Structure, Activities and Results

As of January 2014, 14.5 million Americans with a history

Management of Childhood Asthma and Healthcare Reform

MIPS Reporting Deep Dive: Which Path is Right for Your Practice?

Submitted to the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Federal Efforts to Combat the Opioid Crisis

Based on Medicare FFS Beneficiaries Assigned July 1, 2011 December 31, 2011

2017 Community Oncology Alliance 1

Increasing Adult Immunization Rates in the US Through Data and Quality: A Roadmap

Cancer Technical Report January 13, 2017

CMS Physician Quality Reporting System - Incentive vs. Penalty Part I of II Part Series on CMS Physician Value Based Purchasing Initiatives

Hypoglycemia and Quality Measurement

REIMBURSEMENT AND ITS IMPACT ON YOUR DIALYSIS PROGRAM Tony Messana Executive Director Renal Services St. Joseph Hospital - Orange

2017 PGIP Fact Sheet Electronic Prescribing of Controlled Substances (EPCS)

Making Diabetes Prevention a Reality: The National Diabetes Prevention Program

The Challenge. Bill Frist, M.D.!

Home-Based Asthma Interventions: Keys to Success

An Alternative Payment Model Concept for Office-based Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

2013 ANNUAL CANCER REPORT

Please Provide Responses to the Fields Below Electronically to be Accepted

Design, Results, and Implementation of a Whole Person Intervention for Late Life Care Steven Schroeder, MD

Transcription:

Clinical Pathways in the Oncology Care Model Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center (CMMI) Andrew York, PharmD, JD

Faculty Andrew York, PharmD, JD Social Science Research Analyst Patient Care Models Group Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation 3

Disclosures Andrew York has nothing to disclose 4

Learning Objectives Define the goals and theory of action in the Oncology Care Model (OCM) Identify the key elements of OCM model design List the OCM Practice Redesign Activities Describe the role of Clinical Pathways in OCM 5

Agenda Overview of CMMI Oncology Care Model Practice Redesign Activities Payment Methodology Role of clinical pathways in OCM Value of clinical pathways: reducing costs while improving care Clinical pathways in OCM design Challenges of using clinical pathways Application of clinical pathways in OCM Practice redesign activity: use of national guidelines Other payers CMMI = Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services Innovation Center; OCM = Oncology Care Model 6

Innovation at CMS Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation (Innovation Center) Established by section 1115A of the Social Security Act (as added by Section 3021 of the Affordable Care Act) Created for purpose of developing and testing innovative health care payment and service delivery models within Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP programs nationwide Innovation Center priorities: Test new payment and service delivery models Evaluate results and advance best practices Engage a broad range of stakeholders to develop additional models for testing CHIP = Children s Health Insurance Program; CMS = Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 7

Innovation Center Models Aim to reduce program expenditures... while preserving or enhancing the quality of care Range in focus, including: o Accountable Care Organizations o Primary Care Transformation o Bundled Payments for Care Improvement o State-Based Innovation 8

Oncology Care Model Background The Innovation Center also focuses on specialty care, including improving the effectiveness and efficiency of oncology care In 2016, more than 1.6 million new cases of cancer will be diagnosed, and cancer will kill an estimated 600,000 Americans in 2016. A significant proportion of those diagnosed are over 65 years old and Medicare beneficiaries 1 According to the NIH, based on growth and the aging of the U.S. population, medical expenditures for cancer in the year 2020 are projected to reach at least $158 billion (in 2010 dollars) an increase of 27 percent over 2010 2 NIH = National Institutes of Health 1. Institute of Medicine Report. Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S and Ganz P, ed. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. 2013. 2. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, et al. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011; 103:117-128. 9

Oncology Care Model (OCM) The Innovation Center s Oncology Care Model (OCM) focuses on episodes of cancer care that include chemotherapy The goals of OCM are to utilize appropriately aligned financial incentives to improve: 1) Care coordination 2) Appropriateness of care 3) Access for beneficiaries undergoing chemotherapy Financial incentives encourage participating practices to work collaboratively with other providers to comprehensively address the complex care needs of beneficiaries receiving chemotherapy treatment, and encourage the use of services that improve health outcomes. 10

OCM Overview Episode-based Payment model targets chemotherapy and related care during a 6-month period that begins with receipt of chemotherapy treatment Emphasizes practice transformation Physician practices are required to implement practice redesign activities to improve the quality of care they deliver Multi-payer model Includes Medicare fee-for-service and other payers working in tandem to leverage the opportunity to transform care for oncology patients across the practice s population Timeline: July 1, 2016-June 30, 2021 FFS = fee for service 11

Practice Redesign Activities 1) Provide Enhanced Services Provide OCM Beneficiaries with 24/7 access to an appropriate clinician who has real-time access to the Practice s medical records Provide the core functions of patient navigation to OCM Beneficiaries Document a care plan for each OCM Beneficiary that contains the 13 components in the Institute of Medicine Care Management Plan 3 Treat OCM Beneficiaries with therapies that are consistent with nationally recognized clinical guidelines 3. Institute of Medicine Report. Levit L, Balogh E, Nass S and Ganz P, ed. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. 2013 12

Practice Redesign Activities (cont.) 2) Use certified electronic health record technology (CEHRT) OCM Practices must use CEHRT in a manner sufficient to meet the requirements of an eligible alternative payment entity under the MACRA rule implementing the Quality Payment Program. 3) Utilize data for continuous quality improvement Practices must collect and report clinical and quality data to the Innovation Center. In addition, the Innovation Center will provide participating practices with feedback reports for practices to use to continuously improve OCM patient care management. MACRA = Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 13

OCM Practices Nearly 200 oncology practices are participating in OCM. OCM Practices: Medicare-enrolled physician groups identified by a single Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Composed of one or more physicians who treat Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer Cover urban, suburban and rural areas Range in size from solo oncologists to large practices with hundreds of providers 14

OCM Payers 16 commercial insurers are supporting OCM practices in their practice transformation efforts; payers include regional and national organizations The goal of multi-payer participation is to provide aligned financial support and quality measurement across a practice s patient population, in order to facilitate whole practice change CMS and the OCM payers will convene regularly throughout the model to share lessons learned on engaging in alternative payment model work that supports oncology practice transformation 15

OCM Payer Alignment OCM payers are aligning their models with the Medicare FFS arm of OCM (OCM-FFS) in the following ways: Provide payments for enhanced services and for performance Include patients receiving chemotherapy as a focus of the model Require similar practice requirements Share data with participating practices Align with CMS on a core quality measure set FFS = fee for service 16

OCM-FFS Beneficiary Population Medicare beneficiaries who meet each of the following criteria for the entire 6-month episode are included in OCM-FFS: Enrolled in Medicare Parts A and B; Does not receive the Medicare End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) benefit; Medicare as his or her primary payer; Not covered under Medicare Advantage or any other group health program; Received an included chemotherapy treatment for cancer; and Has at least one Evaluation & Management (E&M) visit with an included cancer diagnosis during the 6 months of the episode. FFS = fee for service 17

OCM-FFS Episode Definition Types of cancer OCM-FFS includes nearly all cancer types (see Cancer Code List on website) Episode initiation Episodes initiate when a beneficiary receives a qualifying chemotherapy drug The list of qualifying chemotherapy drugs that trigger OCM-FFS episodes includes endocrine therapies but excludes topical formulations of drugs Included services All Medicare A and B services that Medicare FFS beneficiaries receive during the episode Certain Part D expenditures are also included: the Low Income Cost Sharing Subsidy (LICS) amount and 80 percent of the Gross Drug Cost above the Catastrophic (GDCA) threshold Episode duration OCM-FFS episodes extend six months after a beneficiary s triggering chemotherapy claim Beneficiaries may initiate multiple episodes during the five-year model FFS = fee for service 18

OCM-FFS Two-Part Payment Approach During OCM, participating practices continue to be paid Medicare FFS payments. Additionally, OCM has a two-part payment approach: (1) Monthly Enhanced Oncology Services (MEOS) Payment Provides OCM practices with financial resources to aid in effectively managing and coordinating care for Medicare FFS beneficiaries The $160 payment for OCM enhanced services can be billed for OCM FFS beneficiaries for each month of their 6-month episodes, unless they enter hospice or die (2) Performance-Based Payment (PBP) The potential for a PBP encourages OCM practices to improve care for beneficiaries and lower the total cost of care during the 6-month episodes The PBP is calculated retrospectively on a semi-annual basis based on the practice s achievement on quality measures and reductions in Medicare expenditures below a target price FFS = fee for service 19

OCM-FFS Performance-Based Payment 1) CMS calculates benchmark episode expenditures for OCM practices Based on historical data Risk-adjusted and adjusted for geographic variation Trended to the applicable performance period Includes a novel therapies adjustment 2) A discount is applied to the benchmark to determine a target price for OCM- FFS episodes Example: Benchmark = $30,000 Discount = 4% Target Price = $28,800 3) If actual OCM-FFS episode Medicare expenditures are below target price, the practice could receive a performance-based payment Example: Actual = $25,000 Performance-based payment up to $3,800 4) The amount of the performance-based payment is adjusted based on the participant s achievement on a range of quality measures FFS = fee for service 20

OCM-FFS Risk Adjustment Benchmark prices are risk-adjusted for factors that affect episodic expenditures: Age Sex Dual eligibility for Medicaid and Medicare Selected non-cancer comorbidities Receipt of selected cancer-directed surgeries Receipt of bone marrow transplant Receipt of radiation therapy Type of chemotherapy drugs used during episode (for breast, prostate, and bladder cancers only) Institutional status Participation in a clinical trial History of prior chemotherapy use Episode length Hospital referral region Over time, the risk adjustment methodology may incorporate additional factors not captured in claims data, such as cancer staging. 21

OCM-FFS Novel Therapies Adjustment Potential adjustment based on the proportion of each practice s average episode expenditures for novel therapies compared to the same proportion for episodes that are not part of OCM Includes oncology drugs that received FDA approval after December 31, 2014 Use of the novel therapy must be consistent with the FDA-approved indications for inclusion in the adjustment Oncology drugs are considered new for 2 years from FDA approval for that specific indication The novel therapies adjustment may lead to a higher benchmark only (i.e., it will never lower a benchmark) In the future, CMS may modify this adjustment to incorporate value of the novel therapies 22

OCM-FFS Risk Arrangement Options One-Sided OCM practices are NOT responsible for Medicare expenditures that exceed the target price Medicare discount = 4% OCM practices in one-sided risk are in a MIPS APM Must qualify for performancebased payment by mid-2019 to remain in one-sided risk Two-Sided OCM practices are responsible for Medicare expenditures that exceed target price Option to take two-sided risk begins in 2017 Medicare discount = 2.75% OCM practices in two-sided risk that meet the QP threshold are in an Advanced APM MIPS APM = Merit-based Incentive Payment System Alternative Payment Models QP Threshold = QP Threshold 23

OCM-FFS Quality Measures that Affect Performance-Based Payment OCM # Measure Description Source OCM-1 Risk-adjusted proportion of patients with all-cause hospital admissions within the 6-month episode Claims OCM-2 Risk-adjusted proportion of patients with all-cause ED visits that did not result in a hospital admission within the 6-month episode OCM-3 Proportion of patients who died who were admitted to hospice for 3 days or more Claims OCM-4a Oncology: Medical and Radiation Pain Intensity Quantified (NQF 0384/PQRS 143) Practice OCM-4b Oncology: Medical and Radiation Plan of Care for Pain (NQF 0383/PQRS 144) Practice OCM-5 Preventive Care and Screening: Screening for Depression and Follow-Up Plan (NQF 0418/ ecqm CMS2.6.3) Practice OCM-6 Patient-Reported Experience Survey OCM-7 Prostate Cancer: Adjuvant Hormonal Therapy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer (NQF 0390/PQRS 104) Practice OCM-8 OCM-9 OCM-10 OCM-11 Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended or administered within 4 months (120 days) of diagnosis to patients under the age of 80 with AJCC III (lymph node positive) colon cancer Combination chemotherapy is recommended or administered within 4 months (120 days) of diagnosis for women under 70 with AJCC T1cN0M0, or Stage IB - III hormone receptor negative breast cancer (NQF 0559) Trastuzumab administered to patients with AJCC stage 1 (T1c) III and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy (NQF 1858) Breast Cancer: Hormonal Therapy for Stage I (T1b)-IIIC Estrogen Receptor/Progesterone Receptor (ER/PR) Positive Breast Cancer (NQF 0387/eCQM CMS140v5.0) Claims Practice Practice Practice Practice OCM-12 Documentation of Current Medications in the Medical Record (NQF 0419/eCQM CMS68v6.1) Practice 24

OCM FFS Program and Payment Overlap Program Overlap: Overlap with OCM is allowable for the following programs: Shared savings programs (e.g., Pioneer Accountable Care Organizations [ACOs], Medicare Shared Savings Program [MSSP]) Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative (CPC) Bundled Payments for Care Improvement Initiative (BPCI) Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Model (CJR) Medicare Care Choices Model (MCCM) OCM practitioners may not participate concurrently in OCM and the Transforming Clinical Practice Initiative (TCPI) Care Management Services Chronic Care Management (CCM), Transitional Care Management (TCM), Home Health Care Supervision, Hospice Care Supervision, and End Stage Renal Disease management services: Practices that bill the MEOS payment cannot also bill for these services in the same month for the same beneficiary. 25

OCM-FFS Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring aims to assess participants compliance, understand use of model funding, and promote the safety of the beneficiaries and the integrity of model. Monitoring data sources may include: Claims data; Practice-reported quality measure and clinical data; Medical records; Patient surveys and patient feedback; Interviews with OCM Beneficiaries and their caregivers; Site visits; Documentation requests, including responses to surveys and questionnaires. Evaluation: CMS s independent evaluation contractor is employing a nonrandomized research design using matched comparison groups to detect changes in utilization, costs, and quality that can be attributed to the model 26

OCM Learning Community The OCM Learning Community includes: Topic-specific webinars that allow OCM participants to learn from each other An online collaboration platform to support learning through shared resources, tools, ideas, discussions, and data-driven approaches to care Action groups in which practices work together virtually to explore critical topic areas and build capability to deliver comprehensive oncology care Site visits to better understand how practices manage services, use evidencebased care, and practice patient-centered care Technical support to help practices overcome barriers to improvement 27

Contact Information Oncology Care Model CMMI Patient Care Models Group Andrew.york1@cms.hhs.gov OCMSupport@cms.hhs.gov http://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/oncology-care/ 28