Oral Methylnaltrexone for the. Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-cancer Pain

Similar documents
Daniel Canafax, PharmD VP, Clinical Research Theravance, Inc.

Movantik (naloxegol), Relistor (methylnaltrexone bromide)

Movantik (naloxegol), Relistor (methylnaltrexone bromide), Symproic (naldemedine)

Pharmacy Benefit Determination Policy

Movantik (naloxegol), Relistor (methylnaltrexone bromide), Symproic (naldemedine)

NDA (APPROVED 2008) snda /S-010 (COMPLETE RESPONSE LETTER July 27, 2012)

754 Journal of Pain and Symptom Management Vol. 42 No. 5 November 2011

daily; available as 10- mg g PO

OPIOID-INDUCED CONSTIPATION DR ANDREW DAVIES

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS DRUG REVIEW 3Q17 July August

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

Opioid-Induced Constipation

Horizon Scanning Technology Summary. Methylnaltrexone for opioid induced constipation in advanced illness and palliative care

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 10 December 2008

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

I.V. CR845 Adaptive Phase 2/3 Post Operative Pain Study Results

OPIOIDS & SUBSTANCE USE DISORDERS SECTION

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Opioid Use in Palliative Care

Technology appraisal guidance Published: 22 July 2015 nice.org.uk/guidance/ta345

Intestinal, non-intestinal, and extra-digestive response to linaclotide in patients with IBS-C: results at Week 4 predict sustained response

RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) tablets, for oral use

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Sufentanil Sublingual Tablet System 15mcg vs IV PCA Morphine: A Comparative Analysis of Patient Satisfaction and Drug Utilization by Surgery Type

RBP-6000 BUPRENORPHINE MONTHLY DEPOT DEMONSTRATES EFFICACY, SAFETY AND EXPOSURE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP IN OPIOID USE DISORDER

Emerging Treatments for IBS-C and Clinical Trial Endpoints

William D Chey, 1 Anthony J Lembo, 2 James A Phillips, 3 David P Rosenbaum 4

See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information.

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

National Horizon Scanning Centre. Methylnaltrexone (MOA-728) for postoperative ileus. April 2008

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

ACTIVITY DESCRIPTION FACULTY. Opioid Use in Palliative Care. Opioid Analgesic Use in Chronic, Non-cancer Pain

Improving the Diagnosis and Management of Opioid-induced Constipation to Optimize Outcomes of Patients with Chronic Pain

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: This drug is not marketed in the United States.

The Road to Opioid-Induced Constipation: Pathophysiology and Impact Kenneth C. Jackson, II, PharmD, CPE

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone. Laura Wozniak February 23, 2010 K30 Monthly Journal Club

Sponsor. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation Generic Drug Name. Agomelatine Therapeutic Area of Trial. Major depressive disorder Approved Indication

MANAGEMENT OF CHRONIC CONSTIPATION BEYOND LAXATIVES

Xifaxan, Lotronex and Viberzi Prior Authorization and Quantity Limit Program Summary

Class Review: Drugs for Constipation

2. SYNOPSIS Name of Sponsor/Company:

Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Extended-Release Tablets M Clinical Study Report R&D/09/1109

David Leff, DO. April 13, Disclosure. I have the following financial relationships to disclosure:

New Zealand Data Sheet. methylnaltrexone bromide solution for subcutaneous injection 12 mg/0.6 ml C.A.S

Synopsis. Clinical Report Synopsis for Protocol Name of Company: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc.

SYNOPSIS. Study center(s) This study was conducted in the United States (128 centers).

Study No.:MPX Title: Rationale: Phase: IIB Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

CENTENE PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS DRUG REVIEW 2Q17 April May

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Effectiveness and Tolerability of Amidotrizoate for the Treatment of Constipation Resistant to Laxatives in Advanced Cancer Patients

Methylnaltrexone Bromide (Relistor)

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

RELISTOR (methylnaltrexone bromide) INJECTION FOR SUBCUTANEOUS USE

Study No: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose, parallel-group study.

Theravance Announces Positive Results from Phase 1 and Phase 2 Clinical Studies with TD-1211 in Development for Opioid-Induced Constipation

Constipation and bowel obstruction

BRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

SYMPROIC (naldemedine tosylate) oral capsule

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 25 Oct 2011

APDW 2016 Poster No. a90312

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

ARDELYX REPORTS POSITIVE T3MPO-2 PHASE 3 TRIAL RESULTS IN IBS-C

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

SYNOPSIS 2/198 CSR_BDY-EFC5825-EN-E02. Name of company: TABULAR FORMAT (For National Authority Use only)

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

ESMO HIGHLIGHTS SUPPORTIVE AND PALLIATIVE CARE

Probuphine. (buprenorphine implant) New Product Slideshow

SYNOPSIS THIS IS A PRINTED COPY OF AN ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT. PLEASE CHECK ITS VALIDITY BEFORE USE.

Amitiza. Amitiza (lubiprostone) Description

1/25/2018 ARE CGRP ANTAGONISTS ANY BETTER THAN CURRENT EVIDENCE BASED TREATMENTS? Disclosures: Objectives: Headache Division

FOOT OFF THE BRAKES. Kerri Novak MD MSc FRCPC. Chronic Constipation: Taking the Foot off the Brakes Dr. Kerri Novak

Ninlaro. (ixazomib) New Product Slideshow

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Opioid-Induced Constipation: Update on Prevention and Management EDUCATIONALPROGRAM

IRONWOOD AND FOREST ANNOUNCE POSITIVE LINACLOTIDE RESULTS FROM PHASE 3 TRIAL IN PATIENTS WITH IRRITABLE BOWEL SYNDROME WITH CONSTIPATION

MorphiDex (MS:DM) Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose Studies In Chronic Pain Patients

A randomised, double-blind, parallel group, multicentre study to compare the tolerability, safety, and efficacy of oxycodone with morphine in

XP23829 PHASE 2 PSORIASIS TRIAL PRELIMINARY TOPLINE DATA PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 COPYRIGHT 2015 XENOPORT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

William Chey, MD University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI

ROME Update from DDW and ACG 2014

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

ALVIMOPAN 0.0 OVERVIEW

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See United States Package Insert (USPI)

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

The Opportunity: c-ibs and pain relief with confidence YKP10811

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Supporting Last Days of Life Symptom Control Medication Guidance: Algorithm. Agitation & Anxiety

Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation in Patients with Noncancer Pain

Horizon Scanning Technology Briefing. Alvimopan (Entrareg ) for opioid-induced bowel disfunction. National Horizon Scanning Centre.

OIC, opioid-induced constipation.

Albiglutide: A New Treatment Option for Type II Diabetes

Clinical Trial Results Summary Study EN

Opioid Induced Constipation Lisa Clince Acute Pain CNS Palmerston North Hospital

Transcription:

Oral Methylnaltrexone for the Treatment of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients with Chronic Non-cancer Pain Richard L. Rauck, 1 John F. Peppin, 2 Robert J.Israel, 3 Jennifer Carpenito, 3 Jeffrey Cohn, 4 Shirley Huang, 4 Enoch Bortey, 4 Craig Paterson, 4 William P. Forbes 4 1 Carolinas Pain Institute, Winston-Salem, NC 2 The Pain Treatment Center, Lexington, KY 3 Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY 4 Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Raleigh, NC DDW 2012

Disclosures Salix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is investigating oral methylnaltrexone as a potential new treatment option for opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in patients with chronic non-cancer pain 3201 is a phase 3, multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study sponsored by Salix Oral methylnaltrexone is not currently FDA approved Dr. Peppin was an investigator in the study, has consulted for Salix, and is currently serving on the Salix advisory board 2

Background Opioid use for chronic non-cancer pain may be complicated by dose-limiting opioid-induced induced constipation, impacting quality of life and pain control Methylnaltrexone bromide Peripherally acting, selective μ-opioid receptor antagonist with restricted CNS penetration Subcutaneous injection approved for OIC in patients with advanced illness in over 50 countries (RELISTOR ) ~1300 subjects studied in the oral clinical development program 3

3201 Study Design Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, controlled parallel group study OIC in subjects with chronic non-cancer pain Screening Double-blind blind Treatment Follow-up (- 14 to -1 (14 days) days) Daily Dosing (QD) 28 days Dose as Needed (PRN) 56 days 150 mg (N = 201) 300 mg (N = 201) 450 mg (N = 200) Placebo (N = 201) Day -14 1 84 98 4

Key Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria Inclusion Chronic non-cancer pain for 2 months and requiring 50 mg oral morphine equiv/day for 14 days prior to screening Required laxative therapy for 30 days prior to screening (discontinued at screening) At least 1 bowel movement (BM) during the screening period OIC during screening: < 3 RFBMs/week on average associated with 1 or more of the following Bristol Stool Form Scale type 1 or 2 for 25% of RFBMs Straining during at least 25% of RFBMs Sensation of incomplete evacuation after 25% of RFBMs Exclusion Mechanical bowel obstruction Rectal outlet obstruction or fecal impaction at screening Negative urine drug screen for opioids 5

Baseline Characteristics ITT Population Placebo (N = 201) All 150 mg 300 mg 450 mg (N = 201) (N = 201) (N = 200) (N = 602) Avg Number of RFBMs Per Week* Mean (SD) 149 1.49 146 1.46 135 1.35 137 1.37 140 1.40 (1.05) (0.91) (0.89) (0.79) (0.87) # of Pts. with Avg 188 191 195 195 581 RFBMs Per Week < 3 (93.5%) (95%) (97%) (97.5%) (96.5%) n(%) Oral Morphine Equivalents, mg/day Mean (SD) 207.4 (199.7) 199.7 (206) 262.0 (358.3) 219.8 (191.9) 227.2 (264.1) *Defined as 7 x (number of RFBMs / number of days with diary data) 6

Efficacy Endpoints Primary Percentage of doses resulting in any rescue-free bowel movement (RFBM*) within 4 hrs of dosing during daily dosing period Key Secondary Change in weekly number of RFBMs from baseline during daily dosing Responder** to study drug during daily dosing *RFBM **Responder Defined as a bowel movement that occurred without laxative use (i.e., no laxative use within 24 hrs prior to the bowel movement) 3 RFBMs/week, with 1 RFBM/week increase over baseline, for 3 of first 4 weeks 7

Primary Efficacy Endpoint ITT Population, Daily Dosing Period Percentage of Doses Resulting in any RFBM within 4 hrs 30 p < 0.0001 % Doses s Resultin ng in RFB BM 25 20 15 10 5 18.08% p = 0.3078 21.05% p = 0.0040 24.64% 27.40% 0 Placebo 150 mg 300 mg 450 mg p-value adjusted for multiple comparisons based on Hochberg method 8

Time to First RFBM from the First Dose 05 0.5 Probability of Reachi ing the End dpoint 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 Time (hr) 300mg p-value < 0.0001 450mg p-value < 0.0001 150mg p-value = 0.0160 Placebo 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 9

Primary Efficacy Endpoint ITT Population, 12 Week Combined Dosing Periods p, g Average Proportion (%) of RFBMs per subject within 4 hrs of all doses Placebo (N=201) 150 mg (N=201) 300 mg (N=201) 450 mg (N=200) Mean % 18.78 22.36 25.2929 28.05 (SD) (17.22) (20.34) (21.98) (24.02) p-value vs. PBO 0.0899 0.0017 <0.0001 Combined QD (4 week) & PRN (8 week) Dosing Period 10

Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Change in Weekly Number of RFBMs from Baseline During Daily Dosing Period Baseline Weekly RFBMs Mean (SD) Median (min, max) Placebo (N = 201) 1.49 (1.045) 1.40 (0, 7.5) 150 mg 300 mg 450 mg (N = 201) (N = 201) (N = 200) 1.46 (0.911) 1.50 (0, 4.2) 1.35 (0.891) 1.40 (0, 4.4) 1.37 (0.789) 1.40 (0, 3.2) Mean 1.71 1.88 2.39 2.40 (SD) (1.940) (2.123) (2.727) (2.448) Change from Baseline Weekly RFBMs Median (min, max) Adjusted p-value vs. PBO 1.42 (-2.3, 9.3) 1.67 (-2.3, 9.6) 1.92 (-2.2, 17.2) 1.98 (-2.1, 12.4) n.s. 0.0088 0.0088 11

Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Percentage of Subjects Responding* During Daily Dosing Period Placebo (N = 201) 150 mg (N = 201) 300 mg (N = 201) 450 mg (N = 200) Responders, n (%) 74 (36.8) 83 (41.3) 96 (47.8) 101 (50.5) % Difference vs. PBO (95% CI) 4.5 (-5.1, 14) 10.9 (1.3, 20.5) 13.7 (4.1, 23.3) Odds Ratio: /PBO 123 1.23 155 1.55 180 1.80 (95% CI) (0.82,1.84) (1.04,2.32) (1.20,2.69) Adjusted p value vs. PBO n.s. 0.0321 0.0083 *Responder: 3 RFBMs/week, with 1 RFBM/week increase over baseline, for 3 of first 4 weeks. Each RFBM was a bowel movement that occurred without laxative use (no laxative use within 24 hrs prior to the bowel movement). 12

Efficacy of Oral vs. Subcutaneous Injection ITT Population, First 4 Weeks p, Percentage of Doses Resulting in any RFBM within 4 hrs Doses (% %) Perce entage of 3201 35 Oral Formulation 35 Primary Efficacy Endpoint 30 27.4 30 28.9 24.6 25 20 15 10 5 0 18.1 21.1 Placebo 150 mg 300 mg 450 mg 25 20 15 10 5 0 9.4 3356 SC Formulation Co-Primary Efficacy Endpoint 82 8.2 30.2 PBO 12 mg QOD 12 mg QD PBO QOD Doses Active Doses 13

Most Common Adverse Events Safety Population, 12 Week Study Period y p, y Preferred Term, n (%) Placebo (N = 201) 150 mg (N = 201) 300 mg (N = 201) 450 mg (N = 200) Abdominal pain 17 (8.5) 11 (5.5) 5) 16 (8.0) 21 (10.5) Nausea 18 (9.0) 13 (6.5) 16 (8.0) 12 (6.0) Diarrhea 7 (3.5) 7 (3.5) 13 (6.5) 16 (8.0) Flatulence 9 (4.5) 11 (5.5) 7 (3.5) 10 (5.0) URTI 9 (4.5) 9 (4.5) 7 (3.5) 8 (4.0) Back pain 7 (3.5) 12 (6.0) 6 (3.0) 5 (2.5) UTI 7 (3.5) 7 (3.5) 8 (4.0) 7 (3.5) Anxiety 3 (1.5) 6 (3.0) 9 (4.5) 7 (3.5) Hyperhidrosis 4 (2.0) 6 (3.0) 8 (4.0) 6 (3.0) Headache 8 (4.0) 2 (1.0) 8 (4.0) 9 (4.5) Vomiting 9 (4.5) 3 (1.5) 6 (3.0) 7 (3.5) 14

Key Safety Findings No notable differences in clinical laboratory results, vital signs, ECG findings, or use of concomitant medications Mean opioid withdrawal scores and pain scores did not demonstrate any clinically significant change from baseline Incidence of SAEs was 3% in the all group versus 4% in the placebo group None were considered related to study drug No events of GI perforation There were no deaths during the study 15

Conclusions Oral methylnaltrexone 300 mg and 450 mg significantly increased the percentage of doses resulting in any RFBM within 4 hrs QD period (primary endpoint) and overall 12 week study period Oral methylnaltrexone at 150 mg, 300 mg, and 450 mg demonstrated a linear dose response (p<0.0001) 0001) Significant differences for 3 RFBMs/week with an increase of 1 RFBM/week over baseline (key secondary endpoint) 300 mg and 450 mg QD dosing Efficacy of the oral formulation was comparable to subcutaneous injection Low incidence of adverse events similar across treatment groups and placebo 16