INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS

Similar documents
PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS EXPERIENCES

ABOUT PHYSICAL ACTIVITY

FATIGUE. A brief guide to the PROMIS Fatigue instruments:

PHYSICAL STRESS EXPERIENCES

MEANING AND PURPOSE. ADULT PEDIATRIC PARENT PROXY PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 Meaning and Purpose PROMIS Short Form v1.0 Meaning and Purpose 4a

COGNITIVE FUNCTION. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v1.0 Cognitive Function PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Cognitive Function 7a

PAIN INTERFERENCE. ADULT ADULT CANCER PEDIATRIC PARENT PROXY PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.1 Pain Interference PROMIS-Ca Bank v1.0 Pain Interference*

INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS

ANXIETY. A brief guide to the PROMIS Anxiety instruments:

Smoking Social Motivations

SLEEP DISTURBANCE ABOUT SLEEP DISTURBANCE INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS. 6/27/2018 PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Page 1

ABOUT SMOKING NEGATIVE PSYCHOSOCIAL EXPECTANCIES

ABOUT SUBSTANCE USE INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS SUBSTANCE USE. 2/26/2018 PROMIS Substance Use Page 1

PHYSICAL FUNCTION A brief guide to the PROMIS Physical Function instruments:

GLOBAL HEALTH. PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7 PROMIS Pediatric Scale v1.0 Global Health 7+2

GENERAL SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-EFFICACY FOR MANAGING CHRONIC CONDITIONS

ANXIETY A brief guide to the PROMIS Anxiety instruments:

PROMIS Sexual Function and Satisfaction. Manual

Measuring Patient Health with PROMIS : Applications for Social Integration Research and Care

Patient Reported Outcomes in Clinical Research. Overview 11/30/2015. Why measure patientreported

PROMIS Overview: Development of New Tools for Measuring Health-related Quality of Life and Related Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Diseases

The Origins and Promise of PROMIS Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

Contents. What is item analysis in general? Psy 427 Cal State Northridge Andrew Ainsworth, PhD

GENERALIZABILITY AND RELIABILITY: APPROACHES FOR THROUGH-COURSE ASSESSMENTS

Challenges and Opportunities for Using Common PRO Measures in Comparative Effectiveness Research

RARE DISEASE WORKSHOP SERIES Improving the Clinical Development Process. Disclaimer:

Using Analytical and Psychometric Tools in Medium- and High-Stakes Environments

Table of Contents. Preface to the third edition xiii. Preface to the second edition xv. Preface to the fi rst edition xvii. List of abbreviations xix

Instruments Available for Use in Assessment Center

Richard C. Gershon, PhD.

Using the Rasch Modeling for psychometrics examination of food security and acculturation surveys

Primary Care Physician (PCP) Election Form for Charter and Navigate. Employer Name: mandatory

Thank you for reading this.

To open a CMA file > Download and Save file Start CMA Open file from within CMA

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS PEDIATRIC ANXIETY AND NEURO-QOL PEDIATRIC ANXIETY

PROMIS PAIN INTERFERENCE AND BRIEF PAIN INVENTORY INTERFERENCE

Methodological Considerations in Using Patient Reported Measures in Dialysis Clinics. Acknowledgements

Patient Reported Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease. Marsha J. Treadwell, PhD 5 October 2016

Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter. 12 (2). April 2008 (p )

The Effect of Review on Student Ability and Test Efficiency for Computerized Adaptive Tests

Carol M. Mangione, MD NEI VFQ-25 Scoring Algorithm August 2000

Sensitivity of alternative measures of functioning and wellbeing for adults with sickle cell disease: comparison of PROMIS to ASCQ-Me

Meenu Singh, Joseph L. Mathew, Prabhjot Malhi, B.R. Srinivas and Lata Kumar

Initial Report on the Calibration of Paper and Pencil Forms UCLA/CRESST August 2015

Quality of Life. The assessment, analysis and reporting of patient-reported outcomes. Third Edition

Utilizing the NIH Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System

Comparability Study of Online and Paper and Pencil Tests Using Modified Internally and Externally Matched Criteria

PROMIS ANXIETY AND KESSLER 6 MENTAL HEALTH SCALE PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

Conditional Distributions and the Bivariate Normal Distribution. James H. Steiger

Ware NIH Lecture Handouts

Technical Specifications

Autotitrating CPAP: Interpreting Studies

Common Errors. ClinicalTrials.gov Basic Results Database

Equating UDS Neuropsychological Tests: 3.0>2.0, 3.0=2.0, 3.0<2.0? Dan Mungas, Ph.D. University of California, Davis

LEVEL ONE MODULE EXAM PART TWO [Reliability Coefficients CAPs & CATs Patient Reported Outcomes Assessments Disablement Model]

Item Response Theory. Steven P. Reise University of California, U.S.A. Unidimensional IRT Models for Dichotomous Item Responses

Information for Users

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS GLOBAL HEALTH-PHYSICAL AND VR-12- PHYSICAL

How to Compute Mean Scores: CFAI-W

Measuring mathematics anxiety: Paper 2 - Constructing and validating the measure. Rob Cavanagh Len Sparrow Curtin University

3/5/2014. New Research Initiatives to Improve QoL of Persons with SCI Across the Globe. What Are the SCI International Datasets?

PBSI-EHR Off the Charts!

Appendix B. Nodulus Observer XT Instructional Guide. 1. Setting up your project p. 2. a. Observation p. 2. b. Subjects, behaviors and coding p.

PROMIS DEPRESSION AND CES-D

Questionnaire Development and Testing Barbara J. Stussman Survey Statistician NIH/NCCAM

Universally-Relevant vs. Disease-Attributed Scales

Psychological testing

PSYCH-GA.2211/NEURL-GA.2201 Fall 2016 Mathematical Tools for Cognitive and Neural Science. Homework 5

PROMIS DEPRESSION AND NEURO-QOL DEPRESSION

PROMIS ANXIETY AND MOOD AND ANXIETY SYMPTOM QUESTIONNAIRE PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

Item Analysis: Classical and Beyond

The Future of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatology

Healthcare Personnel Safety Component. Healthcare Personnel Vaccination Module Influenza Vaccination Summary. Outpatient Dialysis Facilities

Likelihood Ratio Based Computerized Classification Testing. Nathan A. Thompson. Assessment Systems Corporation & University of Cincinnati.

PROSETTA STONE METHODOLOGY A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES PROMIS SLEEP DISTURBANCE AND NEURO-QOL SLEEP DISTURBANCE

NIH Toolbox. Scoring and Interpretation Guide. September 18, 2012

MCAS Equating Research Report: An Investigation of FCIP-1, FCIP-2, and Stocking and. Lord Equating Methods 1,2

Patient Outcomes in Pain Management. Enterprise One Pain Management Service Mid Year Report

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

Marc J. Tassé, PhD Nisonger Center UCEDD

PatientLink MyLinks FHIR. Page 1 of 8. HIMSS Interoperability Showcase 2019

REPORTING INSTRUCTIONS AND DATA DICTIONARY FOR FY 2017 FLEX PROGRAM PIMS INTRODUCTION

Observer OPTION 5 Manual

Welcome to our e-course on research methods for dietitians

DAT Next Generation. FAQs

PROSETTA STONE ANALYSIS REPORT A ROSETTA STONE FOR PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

Selection of Linking Items

For more information: Quality of Life. World Health Organization Definition of Health

Collecting & Making Sense of

Administering and Scoring the CSQ Scales

Report Reference Guide

The RoB 2.0 tool (individually randomized, cross-over trials)

Meaningful Use - Core Measure 5 Record Smoking Status Configuration Guide

version User s Guide nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnn AUTOMATIC POULTRY SCALES BAT2 Lite

Supporting Students with Medical Conditions

CIRCLE 2.3. Why software?

Empowered by Psychometrics The Fundamentals of Psychometrics. Jim Wollack University of Wisconsin Madison

Consob Net Short Positions ( NSP ) Notification System. User Manual

Distress Screening Playbook

Transcription:

ASTHMA IMPACT A brief guide to the PROMIS Asthma Impact instruments: PEDIATRIC PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v2.0 Asthma Impact PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank v1.0 Asthma Impact* PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v2.0 Asthma Impact 8a PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 Asthma Impact 8a* *Retired measure PARENT PROXY PROMIS Parent Proxy Item Bank v2.0 Asthma Impact PROMIS Parent Proxy Item Bank v1.0 Asthma Impact* PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form v2.0 Asthma Impact 8a PROMIS Parent Proxy Short Form v1.0 Asthma Impact 8a* ABOUT ASTHMA IMPACT The PROMIS Asthma Impact item banks assess self-reported symptoms and impacts specific to asthma that are not adequately captured by other general item banks. Asthma specific symptoms include cough, wheeze, shortness of breath, and avoidance of triggers. Asthma is also associated with impacts such as missing school or activities with other children. All measures assess asthma impact over the past seven days. Asthma impact instruments are available for pediatric self-report (ages 8-17) and for parents serving as proxy reporters for their child (youth ages 5-17). INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT OPTIONS There are two administration options for assessing asthma impact: short forms and computerized adaptive test (CAT). When administering a short form, instruct participants to answer all of the items (i.e., questions or statements) presented. With a CAT, participant responses guide the system s choice of subsequent items from the full item bank (17 items in total). Although items differ across respondents taking a CAT, scores are comparable across participants. Some administrators may prefer to ask the same question of all respondents or of the same respondent over time, to enable a more direct comparability across people or time. In these cases, or when paper administration is preferred, a short form would be more desirable than a CAT. This guide provides information on all asthma impact short form and CAT instruments. Whether one uses a short form or CAT, the score metric is Item Response Theory (IRT), a family of statistical models that link individual questions to a presumed underlying trait or concept of asthma impact represented by all items in the item bank. When choosing between CAT and a short form, it is useful to consider the demands of computer-based assessment, and the psychological, physical, and cognitive burden placed on respondents as a result of the number of questions asked. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 1

VERSION DIFFERENCES Some PROMIS domains have multiple versions of instruments (i.e. v1.0, v1.1, v2.0). Generally, it is recommended that you use the most recent version available which can be identified as the instrument with the highest version number. In most cases, an instrument that has a decimal increase (v1.0 to v1.1) retains the same item-level parameters as well as instrument reliability and validity. In cases where a version number increases by a whole number (e.g., v1.0 to v2.0), the changes to the instrument are more substantial. For asthma impact, v2.0 pediatric and parent proxy measures replaced v1.0. The v2.0 measures changed from using response scores of 0-4 to use 1-5 (item IDs amended with an r ). The calibrations between v1.0 and v2.0 are identical as is the item content on short forms. DIFFERENCES IN CURRENTLY AVAILABLE SHORT FORMS Pediatric and Parent Proxy Short Forms There is 1 pediatric and 1 parent proxy short form for asthma impact. Items were selected based on content and psychometric characteristics. SELECTING A PEDIATRIC OR PARENT PROXY INSTRUMENT In selecting whether to use the pediatric or parent proxy instrument for this domain, it is important to consider both the population and the domain which you are studying. Pediatric self-report should be considered the standard for measuring patient-reported outcomes among children. However, circumstances exist when the child is too young, cognitively impaired, or too ill to complete a patient-reported outcome instrument. While information derived from self-report and proxy-report is not equivalent, it is optimal to assess both the child and the parent since their perspectives may be independently related to healthcare utilization, risk factors, and quality of care. WHICH CALIBRATION SAMPLE SHOULD I USE? The PROMIS Parent Proxy instruments have two calibration samples parent proxy and parent proxy without Local Dependence. The former includes calibrations for all items. This is the default calibration sample. If you aren t sure which calibration sample to use, utilize this one. The parent proxy without Local Dependence does not include calibrations for some items. When using the Scoring Service, use the default calibration sample (e.g., Parent Proxy ). Other calibration samples may exist from past research. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 2

SCORING THE INSTRUMENT Short Forms: PROMIS instruments are scored using item-level calibrations. This means that the most accurate way to score a PROMIS instrument is to use the HealthMeasures Scoring Service (https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac_scoringservice) or a data collection tool that automatically calculates scores (e.g., Assessment Center, REDCap auto-score). This method of scoring uses responses to each item for each participant. We refer to this as response pattern scoring. Because response pattern scoring is more accurate than the use of raw score/scale score look up tables included in this manual, it is preferred. Response pattern scoring is especially useful when there is missing data (i.e., a respondent skipped an item), different groups of participants responded to different items, or you have created a new questionnaire using a subset of questions from a PROMIS item bank. Each question usually has five response options ranging in value from one to five. To find the total raw score for a short form with all questions answered, sum the values of the response to each question. For example, for the pediatric 8-item form, the lowest possible raw score is 8; the highest possible raw score is 40 (see all short form scoring tables in Appendix 1). All questions must be answered in order to produce a valid score using the scoring tables. If a participant has skipped a question, use the HealthMeasures Scoring Service (https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac_scoringservice) to generate a final score. Locate the applicable score conversion tables in Appendix 1 or 2 and use this table to translate the total raw score into a T-score for each participant. The T-score rescales the raw score into a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. Therefore a person with a T-score of 40 is one SD below the mean. For the pediatric Asthma Impact 8a short form, a raw score of 18 converts to a T-score of 48.4 with a standard error (SE) of 3.0 (see scoring table for the 8a short form in Appendix 1). Thus, the 95% confidence interval around the observed score ranges from 42.5 to 54.3 (T-score + (1.96*SE) or 48.4 + (1.96*3.0). CAT: A minimum number of items (5 for peds and parent proxy CATs) must be answered in order to receive a score for the Asthma Impact CAT. The response to the first item will guide the system s choice of the next item for the participant. The participant s response to the second item will dictate the selection of the following question, and so on. As additional items are administered, the potential for error is reduced and confidence in the respondent s score increases. The CAT will continue until either the standard error drops below a specified level (on the T-score metric 4.0 for peds and parent proxy CATs), or the participant has answered the maximum number of questions (12), whichever occurs first. For most PROMIS instruments, a score of 50 is the average for the United States general population with a standard deviation of 10 because calibration testing was performed on a large sample of the general population. You can read more about the calibration and centering samples on HealthMeasures.net (http://www.healthmeasures.net/score-and-interpret/interpret-scores/promis). The T-score is provided with an error term (Standard Error or SE). The Standard Error is a statistical measure of variance and represents the margin of error for the T-score. Important: A higher PROMIS T-score represents more of the concept being measured. For negatively-worded concepts like asthma impact, a T-score of 60 is one SD worse than average. By comparison, a depression T-score of 40 is one SD better than average. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 3

STATISTICAL CHARACTERISTICS There are four key features of the score for asthma impact: Reliability: The degree to which a measure is free of error. It can be estimated by the internal consistency of the responses to the measure, or by correlating total scores on the measure from two time points when there has been no true change in what is being measured (for z-scores, reliability = 1 SE 2 ). Precision: The consistency of the estimated score (reciprocal of error variance). Information: The precision of an item or multiple items at different levels of the underlying continuum (for z- scores, information = 1/SE 2 ). Standard Error (SE): The possible range of the actual final score based upon the scaled T-score. For example, with a T-score of 52 and a SE of 2, the 95% confidence interval around the actual final score ranges from 48.1 to 55.9 (T-score + (1.96*SE) = 52 + 3.9 = 48.1 to 55.9). The final score is represented by the T-score, a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. PREVIEW OF SAMPLE ITEM Figure 1 shows an adult asthma impact item from the full item bank as it would appear to a study participant during data collection in Assessment Center. Several formats for presenting the items are available for computer-based administration through Assessment Center. Figure 2 is an excerpt from the paper version of the pediatric eight-item short form. This is the paper version format used for all asthma impact instruments. It is important to note that the CAT is not available for paper administration. Figure 1 Figure 2 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 4

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) Q: I am interested in learning more. Where can I do that? Review the HealthMeasures website at www.healthmeasures.net. Q: Do I need to register with PROMIS to use these instruments? No. Q: Are these instruments available in other languages? Yes! Look at the HealthMeasures website (http://www.healthmeasures.net/explore-measurementsystems/promis/intro-to-promis/available-translations/117-available-translations) for current information on PROMIS translations. Q: Can I make my own short form? Yes, custom short forms can be made by selecting any items from an item bank. This can be scored using the Scoring Service (https://www.assessmentcenter.net/ac_scoringservice). Q: How do I handle multiple responses when administering a short form on paper? Guidelines on how to deal with multiple responses have been established. Resolution depends on the responses noted by the research participant. If two or more responses are marked by the respondent, and they are next to one another, then a data entry specialist will be responsible for randomly selecting one of them to be entered and will write down on the form which answer was selected. Note: To randomly select one of two responses, the data entry specialist will flip a coin (heads - higher number will be entered; tails lower number will be entered).to randomly select one of three (or more) responses, a table of random numbers should be used with a statistician s assistance. If two or more responses are marked, and they are NOT all next to one another, the response will be considered missing. Q: What is the minimum change on a PROMIS instrument that represents a clinically meaningful difference? To learn more about research on the meaning of a change in scores, we suggest conducting a literature review to identify the most current information. The HealthMeasures website (http://www.healthmeasures.net/scoreand-interpret/interpret-scores/promis) has additional information on interpreting scores. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 5

APPENDIX 1 SCORING TABLES It is recommended that you use the most recent version available which can be identified as the instrument with the highest version number Asthma Impact 8a - Pediatric v2.0 Short Form Conversion Table Raw Score T- score SE* 8 31.5 5.2 9 35.8 4.0 10 37.7 3.9 11 39.7 3.5 12 41.2 3.3 13 42.6 3.2 14 43.9 3.1 15 45.1 3.0 16 46.2 3.0 17 47.3 3.0 18 48.4 3.0 19 49.5 3.0 20 50.5 3.0 21 51.5 3.0 22 52.5 3.0 23 53.6 3.0 24 54.6 3.0 25 55.6 3.0 26 56.6 3.0 27 57.6 3.0 28 58.7 2.9 29 59.7 2.9 30 60.8 2.9 31 61.8 2.9 32 62.9 2.9 33 64.0 3.0 34 65.2 3.0 35 66.4 3.1 36 67.8 3.2 37 69.2 3.3 38 70.9 3.6 39 72.8 3.8 40 76.2 4.5 SE* = Standard Error on T-Score 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 6

Asthma Impact 8a - Parent Proxy v2.0 Short Form Conversion Table Raw Score T-Score SE* 8 32.0 6.0 9 39.0 4.0 10 41.0 3.0 11 43.0 3.0 12 44.0 2.0 13 46.0 2.0 14 47.0 2.0 15 48.0 2.0 16 49.0 2.0 17 50.0 2.0 18 51.0 2.0 19 52.0 2.0 20 53.0 2.0 21 54.0 2.0 22 55.0 2.0 23 56.0 2.0 24 58.0 2.0 25 59.0 2.0 26 60.0 2.0 27 61.0 2.0 28 63.0 2.0 29 64.0 2.0 30 65.0 2.0 31 66.0 2.0 32 67.0 2.0 33 68.0 2.0 34 69.0 2.0 35 70.0 2.0 36 71.0 2.0 37 73.0 2.0 38 74.0 3.0 39 76.0 3.0 40 80.0 5.0 SE* = Standard Error on T-Score All scoring tables are based on default Parent Proxy calibrations. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 7

APPENDIX 2 SCORING TABLES FOR RETIRED MEASURES Asthma Impact 8a - Pediatric v1.0 Short Form Conversion Table Raw Score T- score SE* 0 31.5 5.2 1 35.8 4.0 2 37.7 3.9 3 39.7 3.5 4 41.2 3.3 5 42.6 3.2 6 43.9 3.1 7 45.1 3.0 8 46.2 3.0 9 47.3 3.0 10 48.4 3.0 11 49.5 3.0 12 50.5 3.0 13 51.5 3.0 14 52.5 3.0 15 53.6 3.0 16 54.6 3.0 17 55.6 3.0 18 56.6 3.0 19 57.6 3.0 20 58.7 2.9 21 59.7 2.9 22 60.8 2.9 23 61.8 2.9 24 62.9 2.9 25 64.0 3.0 26 65.2 3.0 27 66.4 3.1 28 67.8 3.2 29 69.2 3.3 30 70.9 3.6 31 72.8 3.8 32 76.2 4.5 SE* = Standard Error on T-Score 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 8

Asthma Impact 8a - Parent Proxy v1.0 Short Form Conversion Table Raw Score T-Score SE* 0 32 6.0 1 39 4.0 2 41 3.0 3 43 3.0 4 44 2.0 5 46 2.0 6 47 2.0 7 48 2.0 8 49 2.0 9 50 2.0 10 51 2.0 11 52 2.0 12 53 2.0 13 54 2.0 14 55 2.0 15 56 2.0 16 58 2.0 17 59 2.0 18 60 2.0 19 61 2.0 20 63 2.0 21 64 2.0 22 65 2.0 23 66 2.0 24 67 2.0 25 68 2.0 26 69 2.0 27 70 2.0 28 71 2.0 29 73 2.0 30 74 3.0 31 76 3.0 32 80 5.0 SE* = Standard Error on T-Score All scoring tables are based on default Parent Proxy calibrations. 10/5/2016 PROMIS Asthma Impact Page 9