Public Social Partnership: Low Moss Prison Prisoner Support Pathway

Similar documents
Justice Committee. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Written submission from Scottish Mediation

Barnsley Youth Justice Plan 2017/18. Introduction

GOLDEN KEY DESCRIPTION OF THE PEER MENTORING SERVICE

Scottish Care Leavers Covenant

Job Description. HMP Liverpool Drug and Alcohol Recovery Service. Service User Involvement, Peer Mentor & Volunteer Co-ordinatior.

Volunteering Strategy

Dumfries and Galloway Alcohol and Drug Partnership. Strategy

Volunteering in NHSScotland Developing and Sustaining Volunteering in NHSScotland

Circle of Support - Commissioning Outcomes for Young Carers

Aspirations Programme Quarterly Report Q3 (01 October 31 December 2018)

Innovative Income: Diversifying John Hinton Move On MOVE ON - UNLOCKING YOUR POTENTIAL

A SOCIAL JUSTICE CHALLENGE FOR 21 ST CENTURY SCOTLAND: MEETING THE HOUSING NEEDS OF PEOPLE IN AND LEAVING PRISON

Three years of transition

Healthy London Partnership - Prevention Programme Healthy Steps Together Expression of interest

Justice Committee. Commission on Women Offenders

Practitioner article Youth homelessness prevention services provided by Stirling Council and partner organisations

CABINET PROCURING A SUBSTANCE MISUSE & COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICE IN RUTLAND

Job Description hours (worked flexibly within the service opening hours)

1. Introduction. Background

Engaging People Strategy

SOLIHULL BEREAVEMENT COUNSELLING SERVICE (SBCS)

AUTISM ACTION PLAN FOR THE ROYAL BOROUGH OF GREENWICH

CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTOR. Strategic Intent YEAR PLAN

National Prisoner Healthcare Network Annual Report 2016

MJ Nomination Category: Innovation in Social Care Hull Multi Agency Safeguarding Hub (MASH) Humber NHS Foundation Trust

Item No: 6. Meeting Date: Tuesday 12 th December Glasgow City Integration Joint Board Performance Scrutiny Committee

Role Profile. Intensive Support Worker (Crisis Service) Second Step

Working Together Protocol for the Strategic Partnership Boards in Somerset

SUBMISSION FROM GLASGOW CITY COUNCIL

The Wise Group Community Justice Briefing

2. The role of CCG lay members and non-executive directors

ROLE SPECIFICATION FOR MACMILLAN GPs

Sheffield s Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health Strategy for Children and Young People

Role Profile. Early Intervention Support Worker. Second Step

Mental Health & Wellbeing Strategy

Suffolk Wide - Various locations (Ipswich, Bury St. Edmunds and Waveney) regular travel across Suffolk will be required

Invitation to Tender

OUT NORTH WEST ROLE DESCRIPTION

What is the impact of the Allied Health Professional Dementia Consultants in Scotland?

Empowerment, healing and transformation for women moving on from violence

Brighton & Hove Food Partnership: Harvest

Giving Strategy

GOVERNING BODY MEETING in Public 22 February 2017 Agenda Item 3.4

Our Vision Life is great for children and Children and Young people

STRADA

Corporate Parenting Plan

Updated Activity Work Plan : Drug and Alcohol Treatment

The NHS Cancer Plan: A Progress Report

HEALTH CONSUMERS QUEENSLAND

Worcestershire's Autism Strategy

Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report. Prostate Cancer UK

The Children and Social Work Act The role of voluntary sector CSE services in new safeguarding arrangements

The Ayrshire Hospice

MCIP Recruitment Pack

Project Initiation Document:

Primary Health Networks

Solace and Local Government Association response to Ofsted s consultation on the future of social care inspection

The next steps

The barriers and facilitators of supporting self care in Mental Health NHS Trusts

Transforming educational provision for children and young people with autism using the Autism Education Trust Materials and Training Programme

THE CARDIFF COMMITMENT TO YOUTH ENGAGEMENT AND PROGRESSION: REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION & LIFELONG LEARNING

STRATEGIC PLAN. Working to address health inequalities and improve the lives of LGBT people in Scotland

Executive Summary Dr Sam Wright

DRUG AND ALCOHOL TREATMENT ACTIVITY WORK PLAN

AND THE COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING THE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT STANDING GROUP. DATE Paper 3.7

Next Steps Evaluation Report Executive Summary

#IGOffender17. David Watson Director of Justice and Health NACRO

our aberlour Supporting Children and Families Earlier

PROGRAMME INITIATION DOCUMENT MENTAL HEALTH PROGRAMME

Corporate Plan

Alcohol Research UK Research Strategy

ST GILES TRUST SUPPORTING EX-OFFENDERS WITH HIDDEN DISABILITIES

Job Description. Prison-based Family Support Assistant

Role Profile. Peripatetic Mental Health Support Worker. (Bank Service) Second Step

Project Manager Mental Health Job Description and Application Pack

Driving Improvement in Healthcare Our Strategy

Social Value Report 15/16

Monitoring and Evaluation Framework for the Tackling Indigenous Smoking Programme

COMMUNITY JUSTICE OUTCOMES IMPROVEMENT PLAN ( )

Volunteering in NHSScotland A Framework for engaging with young people

Young Person s Lead-- Temporary initially for 1 year. 3 point 20 inclusive of Outer London Weighting

WHAT ARE DECISION MAKERS BARRIERS, FACILITATORS AND EVIDENCE NEEDS REGARDING PEER SUPPORT WORKING? EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

CSD Level 2 from $57,170 $62,811 pa (Pro Rata) Dependent on skills and experience

Preventing and Tackling Homelessness

All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dementia inquiry into dementia and co-morbidities - call for evidence

Working Better Together on Safeguarding: Annual Reports of the Bradford Safeguarding Children Board (BSCB) and the Safeguarding Adults Board (SAB)

provides services for drug and alcohol users, families and carers.

Job Description. Inspire East Lancashire Integrated Substance use Service. Service User Involvement & Peer Mentor Co-ordinator

POSITION DESCRIPTION:

CORPORATE PLANS FOR CHILD PROTECTION AND LOOKED ATER CHILDREN AND YOUNG PEOPLE

INVOLVING YOU. Personal and Public Involvement Strategy

Corporate Parenting 3 Year Report

Published December 2015

FROM CARE TO INDEPENDENCE

REDUCING REOFFENDING

Co-ordinated multi-agency support for young carers and their families

People and Communities Board. Six principles for engaging people and communities. Definitions, evaluation and measurement

Reducing Offending in Partnership

Beginnings Belonging Belief

ABOUT THIS DOCUMENT WHAT WE DO

Transcription:

Case Example Organisational Learning Champions Gallery Public Social Partnership: Low Moss Prison Prisoner Support Pathway In 2012 the new Low Moss Prison opened with a capacity of 700 prisoners, mainly convicted short-term and remand prisoners. Reducing reoffending is a priority both locally and nationally. Low Moss Prison chose to engage with the third sector in a Public Social Partnership (PSP) through which the Low Moss Prison Prisoner Support Pathway was developed as an innovative approach to service redesign, resulting in a step change in the way reducing reoffending is tackled both in the prison and in the community. Background The new Low Moss Prison opened in 2012 replacing the older prison accommodation that had previously occupied the site. It has capacity for 700 prisoners, with a population made up primarily of convicted short-term and remand prisoners from the North Strathclyde and Glasgow Community Justice Authority areas (CJAs) but with a significant number of prisoners from across the Central Belt. Reducing reoffending is a priority both locally and nationally. As a result the Leadership within Low Moss Prison and the CJAs chose to engage with the third sector in a Public Social Partnership (PSP). With the support of Ready for Business through the Scottish Government s Developing Markets for Third Sector Providers programme, the Low Moss Prison Prisoner Support Pathway PSP was developed. This represents an innovative approach to service redesign resulting in a step change in the way reducing reoffending is tackled both in Low Moss and in the community. Following the development of the Low Moss PSP, a further six mentoring PSPs were created through the Reducing Reoffending Change Fund. Scope and Focus The Low Moss PSP was initiated following open discussion between leadership in the North Strathclyde and Glasgow Community CJAs, the Prison itself, and multiple third sector organisations. Turning Point Scotland was selected as lead organisation to drive the PSP forward. There was awareness between all parties that reoffending had to be tackled, with national statistics for Scotland showing a reoffending rate of 53% for the short term prisoner population. The timely rebuild of HMP Low Moss presented the opportunity to look at the current services and to design a new way of working: A model of throughcare delivery which would improve prisoner outcomes by reducing the risk of recidivism after liberation. A model which would boost the level of beneficial contact prisoners had with relevant support organisations and mechanisms. A model which could introduce control, confidence and transparency into the prisoner throughcare pathway. The partnership quickly reached agreement that any new service model would have to be appealing to all partners involved in delivering services to offenders. This would cover not only third sector PSP Case Studies Low Moss Prison 1

organisations currently engaged, but also the many supporting public bodies such as health, mental health, job support agencies and housing, who are all key to improving outcomes for the targeted service user cohort. Based on this knowledge, the initiating leaders agreed that the PSP model would be the best route to achieve the following: Bring all the relevant organisations and stakeholders together Capture and evidence the challenge Commence and maintain robust partnership working Develop a service specification based on evidence and service user consultation Pilot and refine a service to ensure its effectiveness and build a detailed evidence base of the PSP s impact Develop a new sustainable service to be tendered competitively and which all providers could fairly bid for. Progress to Date Detailed service design and piloting: Piloting of the Prisoner Support Pathway is well underway. A detailed Service Design was developed, which coordinates the delivery of services to offenders from third and public sector organisations, supported by dedicated case workers and peer mentoring. The staff team are in place and most of the required systems, protocols and working practices are now embedded in the organization. Crucially, the PSP team is jointly staffed by third sector staff and prison officers, with third sector partners allowed significant access deep into the prison to engage and work with individuals the duty system allows access into halls as late as 8pm. This has led to considerable change in the working relationships and culture of all of those involved. It should be noted that substantial financial support has been provided by the Scottish Government, the Robertson Trust and the Big Lottery Fund to enable the pilot to be carried out over 3 years. Building an evidence base: The PSP continually collects data from service users and monitors outputs to ensure that the PSP is making progress and that there is a significant evidence base in place to drive future sustainability. This has been recently reviewed by external evaluators as part of an interim evaluation. The initial results suggest that the PSP is having a highly positive impact on the lives of those it works with. The PSP has delivered support to a far greater extent than was initially expected during the design phase. Delivering beyond expectations: As a snapshot, between April 2014 and February 2015, 571 referrals were received of which 206 received a full support package from the PSP and 365 received a brief intervention or duty support. As of 19 th March 2015 the service had an active caseload of 198 service users of whom 104 were being supported in the community, 78 being supported within the prison, and 16 were in the process of assessment. 57% of referrals between May 2013 and June 2014 were self-referrals, clearly evidencing the impact the PSP is having on individuals willingness to seek support. PSP activities: During the pilot period to date the PSP supports service users through a large number of different activities which include liaising with other agencies, information about dealing with substance misuse, family support, housing support, outreach, homelessness, recovery plan support, housing liberation support and pre liberation support. These activities are carried out on a personalized basis, providing a positive impact on service users. Quality of Life outcomes: The PSP also monitors and evaluates individual distance travelled in relation to agreed service outcomes. Outcomes reviews are a joint process involving an individual and their key worker and are carried out at least monthly in prison and as often as possible in the community. Significant improvements have been seen in all quality of life outcomes measured: Criminal Activity, Engagement, Living Situation, Physical Health, Psychological Wellbeing, Social Functioning PSP Case Studies Low Moss Prison 2

and Substance Misuse. Social functioning represents the highest improvement rate of all outcomes at 55% and is defined in the PSP outcomes guidance as improved capacity to participate and be valued in society (i.e. how a person relates to others). This definition includes a person s ability to participate in society via work, training or education and to form positive pro-social relationships. Key Challenges There has inevitably been a number of challenges which the PSP partners have been required to address and overcome. These include: Timescales - The design group was required to baseline current provision and develop the new approach to managing and delivering throughcare services within tight timelines approximately four months. This required strong commitment from all participants. However it also provided a key focus for the group and ensured continued progress. Stakeholder management - Due to the nature of services to prisoners, there were a significant number of stakeholders across the public and third sectors. This requires continued engagement through a variety of means face to face meetings, newsletters and stakeholder events have all formed part of a comprehensive communications plan which the PSP has developed and implemented to ensure there is constant focus on identifying and engaging with stakeholders who have an interest and/or influence on the PSP. Partnership working - Although working in partnership is by no means new to public and third sector partners, the PSP model was a new approach for many. The process of building an understanding of the model took time. However, this ultimately provided the foundation for maintaining progress throughout the project and it is clear that the Low Moss partnership is particularly strong with all partners bought into and focused on achieving shared values and outcomes. Structural barriers the PSP has encountered many external barriers throughout the design and piloting process, for example whether this is housing support processes adopted in various local authorities, legislative implications or the impact of welfare reform. The PSP s operational management and governance has sought to identify these barriers at an early stage and work to overcome or work around them wherever possible. Sustainability the Low Moss Prisoner Support Pathway has been developed as a new service, which means that it has no clearly identified commissioning body to procure the service in future. While the PSP has clearly been focused on continued service development, significant effort has also been needed on the future sustainability and procurement of the service. In particular, the identification and ongoing engagement of potential funders has been resource intensive and has at times raised the possibility of distracting key PSP partners from the here and now. Clearly linked to this is the challenge facing potential public sector funders who, whilst recognising the preventative benefits of the PSP, must assess how funding can be identified and allocated to supporting the future delivery of the service. Outcomes Use of the PSP approach has delivered a number of key benefits to those organisations involved in the PSP and, most importantly, those who have accessed support through the pathway. These have included: A simpler, more innovative service - The collective knowledge of the PSP partners provided key insight into offender needs and what the local community can provide to help eliminate blockers in the existing service delivery model and to support the move towards more innovative service delivery. Diverse provider market - The PSP has provided a structure and control mechanism, which providers could engage with and freely PSP Case Studies Low Moss Prison 3

participate in developing a new service knowing that they had clearly articulated the boundaries of the relationships to ensure provider developed Intellectual Property was not at risk. Through this structured knowledge sharing and partnership working, it has increased the number of viable providers who are delivering beneficial services to Low Moss Prison and the depth and effectiveness to which they are providing it. Positive impact on individuals - The interim evaluation has shown that evidence of a positive impact on individuals is beginning to emerge. By the summer of 2014 those interviewed by the evaluators were able to provide some qualitative evidence and case study examples of early outcomes in terms of their own service provision. The service users themselves who were interviewed were also clearly able to discuss their own experiences in detail, and to provide their views of the impact of the PSP on them. There was a generally shared view that the PSP is beginning to make a positive difference to individuals lives and to the means of service delivery across its operational area. Across all individual outcomes, as noted above, data suggests that more service users considered their circumstances to have improved than to have worsened. Iteration through piloting. The piloting phase of the Prisoner Support Pathway is allowing a robust period of testing before tendering. This means that the partnership is able to identify and address strategic, operational, and governance challenges in a safe environment, whilst ensuring that the pathway continues to develop to meet increasing demand and to effectively assist each individual to access and benefit from the range of supports they require. Critical success factors There are a number of critical success factors which have underpinned the positive delivery of the model to date. Point Scotland as the lead organisation with strong contributions made by Alternatives WD, Families Outside, the Wise Group, Sacro and Action for Children. Being driven from the third sector potentially could have presented a challenge in having to effectively engage with service commissioners and funders within the public sector. However, the partnership quickly overcame this and used their detailed service knowledge to develop a strong service design and a robust business case which clearly evidenced the case for change. Varied skills and knowledge - The PSP journey required a blend of skills, including leadership, project management, service user engagement, and analytical skills. The partnership approach meant that various skills and knowledge pools could be drawn from when needed. Open-minded and flexible approach - This project was approached without pre-conceived ideas about the PSP model and what was not achievable through it. This meant that the new service model was approached with a blank slate, thereby allowing partners to table innovative approaches to reducing reoffending. In particular, it has been found that the support needs of each person are highly individual and so the approach adopted by the PSP team has been to flex and personalise their response so that it meets the needs of that particular individual at that particular time. This has been key to building trust between key workers and service users and has made a strong contribution to the success of the service to date. Working to timescales - The project has been reliant on accessing external funding sources for the pilot period, with each funder having its own timescales and evidential requirements to adhere to. This meant that the service design, pilot and any supporting funding proposals had to take account of the views and requirements of key external stakeholders. Third Sector driven - The PSP activity was chiefly driven by the third sector, with Turning PSP Case Studies Low Moss Prison 4

Partnership working - The shared approach of multiple organisations working together has meant that there has been a real opportunity to holistically consider how services are delivered to offenders, and to improve understanding of how relationships between providers operate. Consequently, partners were able to identify how they could improve service user outcomes by working collaboratively and introducing common and shared working practices such as information sharing protocols. Focus on issue resolution - At both the operational management and governance levels of the PSP, there has been strong commitment to proactive identification and resolution of issues which can affect the future delivery and success of the pathway. As an example, it was identified at an early stage that the housing support processes within individual authorities differed and in many cases did not allow service users to register for housing until they had been liberated from prison. This was having a substantial impact on individuals and as a result the PSP set up a housing sub-group to focus specifically on addressing these problems. Early evidence suggests that this approach is starting to bear fruit and is delivering benefits to the PSP and service users. Future ambitions The PSP pilot is well underway, and work will continue to develop the service and gather evidence that the Prisoner Support Pathway delivers considerable benefits to service users and the partner organisations involved, and as a result has a positive impact on reoffending rates. This evidence will be used to construct a business case for the future sustainability of the PSP once funding for the pilot comes to an end. Therefore, the PSP leadership are now focused on identifying and engaging those stakeholders who benefit from the PSP s work and who may be in a position to fund the ongoing delivery of the pathway. For further information, contact: David Fogg, Manager T: 07919 392 369 E: david.fogg@kpmg.co.uk PSP Case Studies Low Moss Prison 5