South Sacramento Valley Processing Tomato Production Meeting

Similar documents
Stanislaus County Processing Tomato Variety Trial Report

SAN JOAQUIN & CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES

Brenna Aegerter Michelle Le Strange Gene Miyao Scott Stoddard Tom Turini. University of California Cooperative Extension

Processing Tomato Breeding and Genetics Research 2005.

Management of Fusarium and other Soil Borne Diseases in Tomatoes and Vegetables

Plant Water Relations: Irrigation Advice Directly From the Tree. Ken Shackel, UCD Plant Sciences August 4, 2009

Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 2006

Evaluation of Chemigation Treatments & Composted Poultry Manure

Brenna Aegerter UCCE San Joaquin County

Emergence of a resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus (TSWV) in California

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

Processing Tomato Cultivar Trials Research Report 2004

ORGANIC ROMAINE HEARTS LATE SUMMER 2017 SALINAS, CA

2015 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut, Jay, FL

Fusarium Diseases of Tomato. Hung Doan, Gene Miyao and Mike Davi Department of Plant Pathology University of California, Davis

INSECTICIDE EFFICACY TRIAL FOR THRIPS CONTROL IN DRY BULB ONIONS

2007 Powdery Mildew of Cantaloupe Fungicide Trial

In-depth studies initiated: Results:

Agronomy Notes Vol 30, No EARLY MATURING VARIETIES AND SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES: WILL THIS MARRIAGE WORK?

Objectives: 1. Determine the effect of nitrogen and potassium applications on sugar beet root yield and quality.

Final Report: Fungicide control of Powdery mildew of Cucurbit: 2015 field trial

Update on Lettuce Fusarium Research. Michael E. Matheron Extension Plant Pathologist University of Arizona Yuma Agricultural Center

Methods and Materials:

Final Report 2015 Field Demonstrations of Sorghum Forages for the California Dairy Industry

Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation (ASD) Research Update: Fusarium Wilt Control by ASD

Results and Discussion

2018 MICHIGAN DRY BEAN TRIALS

Premier Russet Management Guide - Idaho

LYGUS BUG MANAGEMENT IN SEED ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

2011 Lygus Bug Management Trial in Blackeyes Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA C.A. Frate 1, S.C. Mueller and P.B.

Corn Silage Tests in Tennessee

Silage Hybrid testing at Penn State. Penn State testing program. Overall goals of our program

Management of the plant resistance breaking strain of Tomato spotted wilt virus

Treatments protocol # Sponsor Materials Timing/interval FP/ac Tol 1 lab non-treated Y 2 lab Thiram 65WSB 14d 3.0 lb Y

Ohio Vegetable & Small Fruit Research & Development Program 2007 Report on Research

Improving Prune Irrigation Efficiency DP04002

2017 Michigan Regional Trial

Powdery mildew management in processing tomatoes. Brenna Aegerter University of California Cooperative Extension, San Joaquin County

WATERMELON 2006 Powdery Mildew Control Trial in Stanislaus County

University of California Cooperative Extension Tulare County. Grape Notes. Volume II, Issue 5 October 05

S. Kaan Kurtural. Viticulture Chair

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR SIX

Evaluation of Powdery Mildew Tolerance in Pumpkin in Central Kentucky

EVALUATION OF FUNGICIDES FOR CONTROL OF BLACK SHANK IN TOBACCO

Texas Panhandle Sorghum Hay Trial 2008

USING AEROSOL PHEROMONE PUFFERS FOR AREA-WIDE SUPPRESSION OF CODLING MOTH IN WALNUTS: YEAR FOUR

Managing transplant size and advancing field maturity of fresh tomatoes and peppers

USE OF OCEANGROWN PRODUCTS TO INCREASE CROP YIELD AND ESSENTIAL NUTRIENT CONTENT. Dave Franzen, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND

Section 5: Wheat Scab Research

Investigations into the use of stevia as a rotation crop in tobacco production systems

Impact of Biofield Treatment on Growth and Yieldof Lettuce and Tomato

2011 VERMONT ORGANIC CORN SILAGE VARIETY TRIAL MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pear Scab in Oregon Symptoms, disease cycle and management

CONTENTS. Early Blight Fungicide Trials...2 o Early blight degree days o Early blight fungicide trial...4

Research Abstract for the CALIFORNIA LEAFY GREENS RESEARCH PROGRAM April 1, 2012 March 31, 2013

Survey of Insecticide Use in Sugarbeet in Eastern North Dakota and Minnesota Sugarbeet Research and Extension Reports.

Keywords: hydroponic, media, soilless culture, zeolite

2013 Flax Variety Trial

SENATE BILL No. 676 AMENDED IN SENATE APRIL 28, 2011 AMENDED IN SENATE MARCH 31, Introduced by Senator Leno.

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

RESPONSES TO REGULATED DEFICIT IRRIGATION OF A NECTARINE ORCHARD IN SOUTHERN SPAIN (S15.215)

Cucurbit Downy Mildew Early Warning Scouting Program Project Report October 2007

California Department of Finance Demographic Research Unit

REPORT TO THE AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR THE OREGON PROCESSED VEGETABLE COMMISSION December 2010 Project Title: Management of Fusarium

Evaluating Corn Silage Management. Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY

Evaluation of Three Systemic Fungicides. for Control of Powdery Mildew


Gerald Brust IPM Vegetable Specialist. Vegetable Fertility

Project Title: Assessment of new pest management tools that address priority needs of the BC Cranberry Industry

D. A. Goldhamer, R. Beede, S. Sibbett, D. Ramos, and F. Van Brocklin

Introduction to Wolf Trax

CoRoN Enhancement of Pumpkin Fungicides: Effects on Foliar Diseases. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt, University of Tennessee

California County Asthma Mortality Chart Book

Source Rate/Acre Ammonium Sulphate and 100 lbs. Ammonium Nitrate P Treblesuperphosphate. Gypsum 1000

2017 ILeVO Trial Harvest Report

IMPACT OF BIOFIELD TREATMENT ON GINSENG AND ORGANIC BLUEBERRY YIELD

Custom Rates for Colorado Farms & Ranches in 2015 Jesse Russell, Norman Dalsted, Jeffrey E. Tranel, R. Brent Young, and Jackie Seyler A

Objective: Procedures:

Suppression of Fusarium Wilt of Watermelon Enhanced by Hairy Vetch Green Manure and Partial Cultivar Resistance

Implementing the Corn Silage Trial Results on Your Farm. Dr. Jessica Williamson, Penn State Joe Lawrence, Cornell CALS PRO-DAIRY

2010 Course 6. Dan Kittredge

Crop Staging guide FungiCideS

Custom Rates for Colorado Farms & Ranches in 2017 Jenny Beiermann, Norman Dalsted, Jeffrey E. Tranel, R. Brent Young, and Jackie Seyler A

2016 Processing Onion Weed Control Trial

In mid-october, all plots were again soil sampled to determine residual nutrients.

Potato Varietal Tests

PRAIRIE RECOMMENDING COMMITTEE FOR OILSEEDS (PRCO) APPENDIX C

Key Data for Sacramento County Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes

P.J. Cotty, Page NO.1 of 8.

Oregon Medical Marijuana Dispensary Program. Thomas A. Burns Director Pharmacy Programs Oregon Health Authority

Previously Published Works UC Office of the President

PSB FIELD ASSAYS. 1 Trial No. 23 Ref no: IPL/KHA/SH/PPX/54 2 Product PS Bacteria 2 % A.S. 3 Crop Name Sorghum


Treatments protocol, Trial 2 # Color Sponsor Materials App Interval FP/A Tol

Trauma System Status Report

Fusarium wilt of lettuce in Arizona. Michael E. Matheron Extension Plant Pathologist Yuma Agricultural Center

Proposition 64 Adult Use Marijuana Act (AUMA) with Information on Medical Cannabis

N dynamics Following Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation (ASD)

Distribution and Incidence of Sugar Beet Diseases in the Wind River and Big Horn River Basins of Northwest Wyoming

Transcription:

2014 South Sacramento Valley Processing Tomato Production Meeting January 9, 2014 1 from Field to Yield This report has been prepared exclusively for the South Sacramento Valley Processing Tomato Production Meeting by Ag-Seeds Unlimited

California Processing Tomato Harvest 2013 Tons per Week Statewide, North, Central, South 2

California Processing Tomato Harvest Northern Region Production by County 2012 & 2013 2012 2013 County Acres Tons Tons / Acre Acre Tons Tons / Acre Yolo 35,000 1,469,095 42.0 35,000 1,574,628 45.0 Colusa 13,000 579,689 44.6 11,000 623,968 56.7 Solano 10,000 338,420 33.8 9,000 354,121 39.3 Sutter 7,000 260,335 37.2 7,000 271,771 38.8 Sacramento 2,000 97,928 49.0 2,000 79,798 39.9 North Region 67,000 2,745,467 41.0 64,000 2,904,286 45.4 Note: Data compiled using USDA/NASS reported acreage and PTAB delivered tons 4

California Processing Tomato Market TOP 15 Varieties 2004 vs 2013 Planted Acres: 301,000 Delivered Tons: 11,671,760 Tons/Acre: 38.8 % Transplants: 62% Solids: 5.18 # EFS: 6 # TSW: 0 2004 2013 H9780 Mkt Share Variety Mkt Share H9780 9.82% H8504 13.57% 3155 7.90% N6366 11.83% HP303 6.81% H5608 7.48% AB2 6.52% H2401 4.77% EPN113 6.04% H5508 3.56% APT410 6.02% N6404 3.42% H9557 6.00% H1015 2.83% CXD179 5.19% H3402 2.62% H9663 4.68% DRI319 2.58% H9665 4.63% UG19406 2.37% N6117 3.28% H4707 2.36% H9494 2.87% N6394 2.05% HMX0830 2.17% AB2 2.04% H8892 2.02% H9663 1.96% HP849 1.86% BQ205 1.89% Planted Acres: 261,000 Delivered Tons: 12,113,015 Tons/Acre: 46.8 % Transplants: > 95% Solids: 5.22 # EFS: 30 # TSW: 36 5

California Processing Tomato Harvest Northern Variety Use Summary: Early (10.3%) Variety Supplier Category Based on Final PTAB Reports Total Loads Solids Color LU ph Mold Green H5003 Heinz Early 2,373 4.85 24.8 3.7 4.41 0.9 3.2 APT410 Seminis Early 2,236 4.73 25.4 3.6 4.41 1.5 1.7 N6397 Nunhems Early 2,185 5.09 25.1 1.0 4.43 0.7 1.1 H1015 Heinz Early 1,949 5.04 24.8 0.9 4.43 0.6 2.1 Shasta Harris Moran Early 1,635 5.19 25.7 4.5 4.32 1.5 1.6 HP816 Seminis Early 618 4.92 27.3 5.5 4.41 0.8 3.3 AB4606 Seminis Early 546 5.46 25.4 1.6 4.42 1.6 0.6 BOS66509 Orsetti Early 337 5.02 25.9 1.9 4.41 2.7 0.7 6

California Processing Tomato Harvest Northern Variety Use Summary: Mid-Season (50.0%) Variety Supplier Category Based on Final PTAB Reports Total Loads Solids Color LU ph Mold Green H5608 Heinz Mid-Season 13,981 4.81 23.1 0.7 4.42 2.5 2.4 N6366 Nunhems Mid-Season 8,864 5.32 25.7 1.3 4.40 1.5 1.4 N6404 Nunhems Mid-Season 8,225 5.17 24.5 0.9 4.42 2.0 0.9 CXD255 Harris Moran Mid-Season 5,799 5.18 25.3 0.8 4.38 1.8 0.8 N6402 Nunhems Mid-Season 3,544 5.24 25.0 0.8 4.39 1.7 1.2 DRI319 Seminis Mid-Season 3,485 5.84 24.1 1.1 4.35 1.9 0.8 AB2 Seminis Mid-Season 2,041 5.24 24.5 1.4 4.32 2.8 0.7 AB0311 Seminis Mid-Season 1,995 5.43 24.0 0.8 4.33 2.5 0.9 H9663 Heinz Mid-Season 1,748 4.85 24.2 1.3 4.40 4.0 4.0 DRI320 Seminis Mid-Season 1,730 5.38 25.0 1.6 4.35 2.1 0.6 BQ205 Woodbridge Mid-Season 1,505 5.59 26.2 1.4 4.35 2.2 1.9 BQ163 Woodbridge Mid-Season 1,068 5.64 24.1 1.5 4.38 1.4 0.5 HM1892 Harris Moran Mid-Season 754 5.18 24.5 0.8 4.47 3.1 0.8 PS650 Seminis Mid-Season 703 5.39 25.7 0.9 4.40 1.4 0.7 AB3 Seminis Mid-Season 355 5.48 25.4 1.0 4.33 2.7 1.0 7

California Processing Tomato Harvest Northern Variety Use Summary: Late-Season (34.0%) Variety Supplier Category Based on Final PTAB Reports Total Loads Solids Color LU ph Mold Green H2401 Heinz Late-Season 6,206 4.87 24.8 0.9 4.34 2.3 4.1 H5508 Heinz Late-Season 4,802 4.68 24.9 0.4 4.36 2.0 1.3 H8504 Heinz Late-Season 4,684 4.99 24.9 0.7 4.34 2.8 4.7 HP849 Seminis Late-Season 4,176 5.04 25.0 0.7 4.38 3.3 0.8 H5702 Heinz Late-Season 3,191 4.85 23.8 0.4 4.43 1.4 4.1 BQ206 Woodbridge Late-Season 3,170 5.45 25.1 1.5 4.34 2.3 0.8 H4707 Heinz Late-Season 2,410 4.89 24.6 0.4 4.37 1.1 2.6 HM9905 Harris Moran Late-Season 2,054 5.20 24.7 0.6 4.47 3.0 0.8 H3402 Heinz Late-Season 1,988 4.82 24.6 0.8 4.45 4.4 1.9 N6407 Nunhems Late-Season 1,952 5.36 25.4 0.7 4.38 2.4 0.8 H1175 Heinz Late-Season 1,725 4.95 23.3 0.3 4.46 2.0 2.4 UG19406 United Genetics Late-Season 1,437 5.49 24.9 0.5 4.30 1.9 0.8 H5701 Heinz Late-Season 1,301 4.88 24.2 0.5 4.36 1.5 4.3 8

California Processing Tomato Harvest Northern Variety Use Summary: F3 (3.2%) Variety Supplier Category Based on Final PTAB Reports Total Loads Solids Color LU ph Mold Green CXD282 Harris Moran F3 3,112 5.26 23.9 0.9 4.41 3.3 2.1 AB0306 Seminis F3 554 5.58 25.2 4.2 4.44 2.3 1.6 9

Ag-Seeds Unlimited Trial Locations 2013 Statewide Plot, GT, Adaptive & Peel Dice Trials Plot (73 Locations) Chemistry & early indications of horticultural performance GT (48 Locations) First test of commercial viability Adaptives (45 Locations) Confirmation of commercial potential Peel / Dice (12 Locations) Measuring In factory recovery improvements 178 Total Processing Tomato Trials 10

Ag-Seeds Unlimited Trial Locations 2013 Northern Plot, GT, Adaptive & Peel Dice Trials Plot (22 Locations) Chemistry & early indications of horticultural performance GT (21 Locations) First test of commercial viability Adaptives (18 Locations) Confirmation of commercial potential Peel / Dice (8 Locations) Measuring in factory recovery improvements 69 Total Processing Tomato Trials in North 11

Typical Plot Trial Configuration F3 Varieties in Trials Plot Trial 120) DRI320 119) DRI320 118) DRI320 117) DRI320 116) DRI320 115) HMX3888 109) UG15908 110) UG19306 111) UG19406 112) Ag13 113) 2233 114) 2261 108) UG6610 107) UG6310 106) H1313 105) H1310 104) H1308 103) H1304 97) HMX4192 98) TC3412 99) TC3469 100) TC3470 101) TC3471 102) H1301 96) HMX3889 95) HMX3887 94) HMX3885 93) HMX3883 92) HMX3893 91) D11X16789 85) SV2849TP 86) BA6106 87) F3132 88) AB4606 89) DRI320 90) BOS602 84) HP108 83) HM7885 82) H2601 81) H1293 80) H1292 79) H9780 73) H8504 74) H9663 75) H9665 76) H4707 77) N6410 78) PS650 72) H1285 71) HP849 70) N6407 69) H5608 68) H5508 67) H1175 61) SV6743TM 62) SV7707TM 63) BQ268 64) BQ295 65) H1170 66) F0613 60) SV4778TM 59) SV1981TM 58) PX1245 55) N6404 56) DRI319 57) PS002 49) H2401 50) H8004 51) N6368 52) N6385 53) N6394 54) N6398 48) CXD282 47) CXD255 46) HMX2898 45) F6989 44) F6986 43) C322 37) H3402 38) SV0335TM 39) AB2 40) BQ316 41) BQ206 42) C316 36) H1161 35) HM7883 34) HM9905 33) HM1892 32) HMX3908 31) HMX3907 25) N6402 26) BQ294 27) BQ297 28) BQ205 29) BA6101 30) HMX2897 24) C324 23) F6994 22) BQ163 21) AB0311 20) N6366 19) DRI320 13) SV0250TM 14) BQ296 15) BQ313 16) HM1893 17) N6412 18) N6397 12) SV9916TM 11) APT410 10) H1015 9) DRI320 8) BQ289 7) BQ287B 1) BQ204 2) BA5098 3) C320 4) CXD187 5) SV0599TM 6) BQ287A Variety 11AB1564 11AB1574 SV335TM 11AB1569 SV8232TM 12-9Z-PSQ-0135 12-9Z-PSQ-0137 12-9Z-PSQ-0140 10AB7577 9Z 0 0473 9Z 1 0578 H1304 H1310 Variety N6412 N6418 BQ141 BQ142 BQ147 BQ148 CXD282 HMX3907 C316 F6994 F6986 F6989 F3132 12

Typical GT Trial Layout Triple Replicated Yield Trials Each variety appears on each bed, and the front, center and back of each trial, to better represent field variability. 13 17 26 10 16 25 9 15 24 8 14 23 7 13 22 6 12 21 5 11 20 4 26 19 3 25 18 2 24 10 1 23 9 17 22 8 16 21 7 15 20 6 14 19 5 13 18 4 12 10 3 11 9 2 26 8 1 25 7 17 24 6 16 23 5 15 22 4 14 21 3 13 20 2 12 19 1 11 18

2013 F3 GT Trial Results 3 Locations, 9 Data Points Variety Yield T/A BQ141 A 48.31 H5608 A B 46.89 A B 46.81 A B 46.50 A B 46.17 H1310 B C 44.64 B C D 44.27 B C D 44.14 B C D 44.09 B C D 43.90 BQ142 C D E 42.82 SV335TM C D E F 41.81 HMX3907 D E F G 41.51 SV8232TM E F G H 40.09 E F G H 39.94 E F G H 39.86 F G H I 39.36 N6412 F G H I 38.96 G H I 38.52 CXD282 H I 37.93 H I J 37.26 H8504 I J K 36.50 N6366 J K L 34.45 K L 33.97 L 32.54 DRI306 L 32.43 LSD 3.125 14

2013 F3 GT Trial Results 5 Locations, 15 Data Points Average Variety Yield T/A A 54.87 A 54.54 A 54.45 H5608 A B 53.93 A B 53.68 A B 53.45 BP2 A B C 53.21 A B C 53.20 A B C D 52.39 H1310 B C D E 51.37 C D E F 50.58 SV335TM D E F G 49.58 HMX3907 E F G H 49.32 F G H 48.52 SV8232TM F G H 48.34 G H I 47.58 G H I 46.86 CXD282 H I J 46.61 N6412 I J K 45.45 H8504 I J K 45.34 N6366 J K L 43.81 DRI306 K L 43.16 C316 L 42.35 LSD 2.817 15

2013 F3 GT Trial Results 6 Locations, 18 Data Points Average Variety Yield T/A H5608 A 52.42 A 52.36 A 52.07 A 51.88 A B 51.22 A B 50.73 A B C 50.45 H1310 B C D 49.29 C D E 48.06 SV335TM D E 47.76 D E 47.61 HMX3907 D E F 46.87 E F G 46.14 SV8232TM E F G 46.00 F G H 44.69 CXD282 G H I 43.88 N6412 G H I 43.63 H8504 H I 43.35 H I J 42.96 N6366 I J K 41.46 DRI306 J K 40.42 C316 K 39.32 LSD 2.551 16

Typical Adaptive Trial Layout F3 Adaptive CXD282 3 beds SV0335TM 3 beds C316 3 bed N6412 3 beds H1310 3 beds H8504 3 beds H1304 6 beds H8504 3 beds H1310 3 beds N6412 3 beds C316 3 beds SV0335TM 3 beds CXD282 3 beds 42 Beds 17

55.0 50.0 46.9 48.1 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Sutter 1, F3 Plant Date: 3/28/13 Harvest Date: 8/2/13 Total Days = 127, TP Sprinkler Irrigation SS, RB 49.5 6.30 50.4 50.4 51.4 5.60 53.7 50.4 6.40 6.20 6.00 5.80 5.60 45.0 5.40 5.03 4.95 5.20 5.27 5.28 5.20 5.00 40.0 4.90 4.80 Tons/Acre Brix Corresponding PTAB Grades Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT C316 4.90 23.00 3.00 5.50 4.45 0.50 0.00 CXD282 5.03 23.67 1.67 0.50 4.41 1.67 0.33 N6412 4.95 24.50 2.75 4.75 4.43 0.75 0.25 SV0335TM 6.30 26.00 3.50 3.50 4.28 0.50 0.50 H8504 5.20 27.00 0.50 1.00 4.35 1.75 0.25 H1304 5.60 24.67 1.33 2.00 4.45 0.83 0.50 H1310 5.27 25.00 1.67 1.83 4.42 0.83 0.17 18

60.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Colusa 4, F3 Plant Date: 4/16/13 Harvest Date: 8/11/13 Total Days = 117, TP Drip Irrigation, KE, TF 6.40 6.20 55.0 53.2 53.5 6.00 50.0 48.5 49.8 51.1 51.6 50.7 5.80 5.60 5.40 45.0 45.9 5.20 5.25 5.07 5.05 5.30 5.20 5.07 5.00 40.0 4.90 4.90 4.80 Tons/Acre Brix Corresponding PTAB Grades Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT H8504 5.20 24.50 0.50 0.00 0.25 0.25 N6366 5.25 22.50 1.25 0.00 0.50 0.00 H1304 5.07 23.67 0.50 0.33 0.00 0.00 C316 4.90 22.67 1.33 0.50 0.00 0.17 N6412 5.05 22.00 1.00 1.50 0.25 0.00 CXD282 4.90 25.67 0.00 0.50 0.17 0.00 H1310 5.30 25.50 1.25 0.00 0.75 0.25 19

25.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Yolo 1, F3 Plant Date: 4/18/13 Harvest Date: 8/24/13 Total Days = 128, TP Drip Irrigation, DR, DB 23.4 23.9 6.90 24.4 7.20 7.00 6.50 21.3 21.6 6.60 22.2 6.80 21.9 6.80 6.60 20.0 20.0 6.34 6.40 18.2 6.20 6.00 6.10 6.10 6.00 5.80 15.0 5.70 5.60 Corresponding PTAB Grades Tons/Acre Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT N6366 6.50 23.00 0.00 7.00 4.56 0.50 0.00 H8504 6.00 23.00 0.00 0.50 4.33 1.50 0.00 C316 6.10 21.00 1.50 5.00 4.47 1.00 0.00 H1304 6.60 23.00 1.00 1.50 4.50 1.00 0.00 N6412 6.10 21.00 1.00 2.00 4.47 2.00 0.00 H1310 6.80 23.00 2.50 1.00 4.40 1.50 0.50 SV0335TM 6.90 25.00 1.50 2.00 4.34 2.00 0.00 CXD282 5.70 22.00 0.00 1.00 4.44 1.00 0.00 20 Brix

50.0 45.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Sutter 2, F3 Plant Date: 4/25/13 Harvest Date: 8/27/13 Total Days = 124, TP Drip Irrigation, SS, ND 44.2 6.15 46.2 47.0 47.2 6.20 5.95 48.3 45.3 6.30 6.10 5.90 5.70 5.61 5.50 40.0 41.8 5.25 5.45 5.33 5.30 5.10 38.6 4.90 4.60 4.70 35.0 4.50 Tons/Acre Brix Corresponding PTAB Grades Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT H8504 4.60 25.00 1.00 0.00 4.51 0.00 0.00 C316 5.25 22.50 5.00 1.75 4.49 0.75 0.25 SV0335TM 6.15 23.50 4.25 1.50 4.33 0.75 0.00 N6412 5.45 23.00 4.25 2.25 4.56 1.00 0.50 CXD282 5.33 23.33 2.17 0.17 4.36 0.17 0.00 H1304 6.20 23.00 3.25 1.00 4.51 0.25 0.00 H1310 5.95 22.50 1.75 0.00 4.48 0.50 0.50 21

50.0 45.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Sutter 3, F3 Plant Date: 5/5/13 Harvest Date: 9/14/13 Total Days = 132, TP Furrow Irrigation, SS, SF 5.00 44.7 5.10 4.90 40.0 4.60 38.3 40.5 4.60 39.9 4.57 4.70 4.50 35.0 35.5 4.30 4.30 30.0 4.10 Tons/Acre Brix Corresponding PTAB Grades Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT CXD282 4.30 25.00 6.25 1.00 4.46 1.50 0.00 H8504 4.60 24.00 4.00 0.50 4.40 1.00 0.50 SV0335TM 5.00 23.00 10.50 1.00 4.41 1.00 0.00 H1310 4.60 25.00 2.50 0.00 4.50 1.50 0.25 22

55.0 50.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Sutter 4, F3 Plant Date: 5/8/13 Harvest Date: 9/10/13 Total Days = 125, TP Drip Irrigation, SS, MB 5.80 52.8 52.8 5.80 5.60 5.30 46.6 46.7 47.4 5.40 45.0 5.20 5.20 44.9 5.20 42.8 5.00 5.00 40.0 4.75 4.75 4.80 37.1 4.60 4.60 35.0 4.40 Tons/Acre Brix Corresponding PTAB Grades Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT C316 5.20 25.00 8.00 2.00 4.48 4.50 0.50 N6412 5.20 29.00 4.00 8.50 4.44 3.00 3.00 H1304 5.30 23.50 3.00 4.50 4.50 3.25 0.75 SV0335TM 5.80 25.00 3.00 5.50 4.38 3.00 0.50 CXD282 4.75 24.50 4.25 1.25 4.47 7.00 0.25 H8504 4.75 23.50 2.00 0.25 4.27 7.00 0.75 H1310 4.60 26.00 5.00 1.00 4.42 7.75 1.50 23

45.0 40.0 Click to edit Master title style 2013 Adaptive Trial Yolo 6, F3 Plant Date: 5/23/13 Harvest Date: 9/24/13 Total Days = 124, TP Sprinkler Irrigation, SS,GR 6.75 36.4 40.1 6.40 40.9 41.6 37.5 6.90 6.70 6.50 6.30 35.0 34.5 34.5 6.23 6.20 6.25 6.10 6.00 5.95 5.90 30.0 5.70 Corresponding PTAB Grades 24 Tons/Acre Variety Brix Color Mold LU ph Green MOT CXD282 6.00 22.00 3.50 0.50 4.37 3.25 3.25 H1304 6.75 25.50 4.00 4.00 4.41 3.00 1.25 H1310 6.23 22.00 1.88 0.50 4.36 1.50 1.25 SV0335TM 6.40 25.00 2.25 5.00 4.31 0.75 4.50 H8504 5.95 26.00 2.75 1.00 4.33 2.25 1.00 N6412 6.20 22.00 0.50 2.00 4.37 0.50 7.50 Brix

2013 Adaptive & GT Trial F3 Yield Correlation CXD282 3 beds SV0335TM 3 beds Adaptive trial and GT trial configuration when planted in same location C316 3 bed N6412 3 beds H1310 3 beds Adaptive Trial Map H8504 3 beds H1304 3 beds F3 GT Trial 3 beds 45 beds H1304 3 beds H8504 3 beds H1310 3 beds N6412 3 beds C316 3 beds SV0335TM 3 beds 25 CXD282 3 beds GT Trial Map 17 26 10 16 25 9 15 24 8 14 23 7 13 22 6 12 21 5 11 20 4 26 19 3 25 18 2 24 10 1 23 9 17 22 8 16 21 7 15 20 6 14 19 5 13 18 4 12 10 3 11 9 2 26 8 1 25 7 17 24 6 16 23 5 15 22 4 14 21 3 13 20 2 12 19 1 11 18

2013 Adaptive & GT Trial F3 Yield Correlation Average Yield of 4 F3GT Trials vs Adaptives in same Location 55.00 52.2 52.9 50.00 46.9 47.2 47.5 48.1 48.3 48.8 49.0 49.5 45.00 44.3 44.0 40.00 26

2014 Adaptive and Semi Commercial Varieties Fusarium Wilt Race 3 Variety Maturity Dis/Res Comments BQ141 120 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Strong vine, Yielded 10 tons/acre more that than CXD282 in trials N6412 116 VFFFNPLv Early, High brix, Good Yields, Powdery Mildew tolerance H1310 128 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Yielded 5 tons/acre more than CXD282 in trials BQ142 120 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Strong vine, Yielded 5.5 tons/acre more that than CXD282 in trials BP2 125 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Yielded 5.5 tons/acre more than CXD282 in trials SV0335TM 122 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Very high brix, Good yields SV8232TM 125 VFFFNPtsw TSW, Good yields HMX3907 122 VFFFN Yielded 4 tons/acre more than CXD282 in trials 27

45.00 Click to edit Master title style 2014 Adaptive and Semi Commercial Varieties Fusarium Wilt Race 3 Semi Commercial Average Yield of 6 F3 Adaptive Trials 55.00 50.00 Adaptives Ave. Yield of 3 F3 GT Trials 48.31 42.31 42.32 45.00 40.00 37.93 40.00 50 CXD282 N6412 Adaptives Ave. Yield of 6 F3 GT Trials 48.41 35.00 60 CXD282 BQ141 Adaptives Ave. Yield of 5 F3 GT Trials 55 53.21 45 43.21 50 45 46.61 40 CXD282 H1310 40 CXD282 BP2 28

2014 Adaptive and Semi Commercial Varieties Early Season July Delivery Variety Maturity Dis/Res Comments N6416 108 VFNPtsw TSW, Yielded 9 tons/acre better than APT410 in trials, is not F2 resistant BP1 110 VFFNP Yielded 4.8 tons/acre more than APT410 in trials H1301 105 VFF Earlier than APT410, with yields of 4.8 tons/acre more in trials, no N resistance SV0599TM 110 VFF APT 410 maturity, with yields of 5.2 tons/acre more in trials BQ273 110 VFFNPtsw TSW, Strong vine with good yields 50.00 Semi Commercial Average Yield of 4 GT Trials 55.00 Adaptives Average Yield of 5 Early GT Trials 45.00 43.23 52.00 40.00 50.00 35.00 34.62 47.17 30.00 APT 410 N6416 45.00 APT410 BP1 29

2014 Adaptive and Semi Commercial Varieties Mid Season August to September 10th Delivery Variety Maturity Dis/Res Comments HMX3887 120 VFFNtsw TSW, Very strong vine, Yielded 11.9 tons/acre more than N6366 in trials BQ296 122 VFFNPtsw TSW, Adaptable, High brix, and Good yields SV8516TM 122 VFFNPtsw TSW, Yielded 5 tons/acre more than N6366 in trials SV7707TM 122 VFFNPtsw TSW, Thick Viscosity,with Strong vine 60.00 Semi Commercial Average Yield of 3 Adaptive Trials 70.00 65.00 Adaptives Ave. Yield of 5 Ag Seeds GT Trials 64.26 56.97 57.71 60.00 55.00 52.31 52.39 50.00 55.00 45.00 N6366 BQ296 N6366 H8504 HMX3887 30

2014 Adaptive and Semi Commercial Varieties Late Season September, October Delivery Variety Maturity Dis/Res Comments HMX3888 125 VFFNtsw TSW, EFS, Strong vine, Yielded 9.2 tons/acre more than H8504 in trials N6410 130 VFFN EFH, Adaptable, Thick with Brix, Good yields H1170 126 VFFN EFS, Adaptable, Thick with Brix, Good yields N6415 125 VFFNPtsw TSW, EFH, Thick with Brix, Good yield HMX3885 120 VFFNtsw TSW, EFS, Strong vine, High Brix, Good yield 50.00 Semi Commercial Average Yield of 10 Adaptives 65.00 Adaptives Ave. Yield of 5 Ag Seeds GT Trials 61.57 47.87 60.00 46.06 55.00 50.00 52.31 52.39 45.00 45.00 H8504 N6410 N6366 H8504 HMX3888 31

Genetics Role in the Tomato Business Past Present Future 32

2013 Northern Trial Cooperators Thank you Without you, none of this work is possible Grower County Grower County Jim Borchard Yolo Matteoli Bros. Sutter Bullseye Farms Yolo Mayflower Farms Colusa Button & Turkovich Yolo Joe Muller & Sons Yolo Dan Best Ranch Yolo Payne Bros. Ranches Yolo Donald Beeman Yolo Reveille Farms Solano Dougherty Bros. Sutter Richter Bros. Sutter E & H Farms Solano Gene Robben Farms Solano Geer Ranch Yolo Rominger Bros. Yolo Harlan Family Farms Yolo Sam Reynolds Colusa Hunn, Merwin & Merwin Yolo Schreiner Farms Yolo J & P Farms Sutter T & P Farms Colusa Joe Yeung Farms Yolo Triad Farms Yolo LaGrande Farms Colusa Tsutsui Ent. Yolo Liberty Trust Yolo Van Ruiten Bros. Sutter Lucero Farms Yolo Vann Bros. Colusa 33