Supplementary Information

Similar documents
Expression of programmed death ligand-1 on tumor cells varies pre and post

Original Article CREPT expression correlates with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma histological grade and clinical outcome

Prognostic significance of nemo like kinase in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Prognostic value of pretreatment and recovery duration of cranial nerve palsy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Clinicopathological Factors Affecting Distant Metastasis Following Loco-Regional Recurrence of breast cancer. Cheol Min Kang 2018/04/05

Significance of the lymph nodes in the 7th station in rational dissection for metastasis of distal gastric cancer with different T categories

Radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: oncologic outcome in 271 Chinese patients

Correlation of pretreatment surgical staging and PET SUV(max) with outcomes in NSCLC. Giancarlo Moscol, MD PGY-5 Hematology-Oncology UTSW

Clinicopathological and prognostic differences between mucinous gastric carcinoma and signet-ring cell carcinoma

Cumulative metformin use and its impact on survival in gastric cancer patients after INDEX

Supplemental Figures. Amylase. Glucose. Pancreas FAP-WT FAP-KO weight (g) mg/dl U/L 0.

Characteristics and prognostic factors of synchronous multiple primary esophageal carcinoma: A report of 52 cases

Evaluation of AJCC, UICC, and Brigham and Women's Hospital Tumor Staging for Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A study on clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of patients with upper gastric cancer and middle and lower gastric cancer.

Predictors and Patterns of recurrence after radical surgery in ampulla of vater cancer: Comparison analysis between early and late recu rrence.

High expression of fibroblast activation protein is an adverse prognosticator in gastric cancer.

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

Jun Lu, Chang-Ming Huang, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jian-Wei Xie, Jia-Bin Wang, and Jian-Xian Lin

Treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of gallbladder cancer patients after postoperative radiation therapy

Androgen Receptor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A New Actionable Target?

Is Hepatic Resection Needed in the Patients with Peritoneal Side T2 Gallbladder Cancer?

Extended multi-organ resection for ct4 gastric carcinoma: A retrospective analysis

Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer in Young Patients

Imaging in gastric cancer

Expression and association of CD44v6 with prognosis in T2-3N0M0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a novel prognostic indicator for advanced ESCC after surgical resection

Implications of Progesterone Receptor Status for the Biology and Prognosis of Breast Cancers

CircHIPK3 is upregulated and predicts a poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer

SCIENCE CHINA Life Sciences

Enrollment Form: Pancreas

The efficacy of bevacizumab in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and its effect in different line setting*

WHAT SHOULD WE DO WITH TUMOUR BUDDING IN EARLY COLORECTAL CANCER?

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Long non-coding RNA CCHE1 overexpression predicts a poor prognosis for cervical cancer

Frequency and clinicopathological features of metastasis to liver, lung, bone, and brain from gastric cancer: A SEER- based study

Original Article Prognostic role of neuroendocrine cell differentiation in human gastric carcinoma

Impact of Prognostic Factors

Impact of esophageal cancer staging on overall survival and disease-free survival based on the 2010 AJCC classification by lymph nodes

Risk Factors and Tumor Recurrence in pt1n0m0 Gastric Cancer after Surgical Treatment

Clinical Outcome of Reconstruction With Tissue Expanders for Patients With Breast Cancer and Mastectomy

List of Available TMAs in the PRN

Gastric Cancer Histopathology Reporting Proforma

A nomogram to predict prognosis for gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination

The clinicopathological features and treatment modalities associated with survival of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma in a Chinese population

Satisfactory surgical outcome of T2 gastric cancer after modified D2 lymphadenectomy

Correlation between estrogen receptor β expression and the curative effect of endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients

Prognostic Factors for Survival of Stage IB Upper Lobe Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Study in Shanghai, China

Survival impact of cervical metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of hard palate

Prognostic Factors for Node-Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy

Prognosis and recurrence pattern of patients with cervical carcinoma and pelvic lymph node metastasis

Predicting prognosis of post-chemotherapy patients with resected IIIA non-small cell lung cancer

PATHOLOGIC FACTORS PROGNOSTIC OF SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH GI TRACT AND PANCREATIC CARCINOMA TREATED WITH NEOADJUVANT THERAPY

Doppler ultrasound of the abdomen and pelvis, and color Doppler

CACA. Original Article

Biomedical Research 2017; 28 (21): ISSN X

Original Article Tissue expression level of lncrna UCA1 is a prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer

Clinical features and prognostic factors in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma relapse after primary treatment

Patient age and cutaneous malignant melanoma: Elderly patients are likely to have more aggressive histological features and poorer survival

Properties of Synchronous Versus Metachronous Bilateral Breast Carcinoma with Long Time Follow Up

Positive impact of adding No.14v lymph node to D2 dissection on survival for distal gastric cancer patients after surgery with curative intent

Lung cancer pleural invasion was recognized as a poor prognostic

Clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes in stage I III mucinous gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study at a single medical center

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Predicting the Prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma After First Recurrence

Treatment and prognosis of patients with recurrent laryngeal carcinoma: a retrospective study

Utility of the Proximal Margin Frozen Section for Resection of Gastric Adenocarcinoma: A 7-Institution Study of the US Gastric Cancer Collaborative

Esophageal carcinoma is one of the most tedious

Cancer Cell Research 19 (2018)

Expression of lncrna TCONS_ in hepatocellular carcinoma and its influence on prognosis and survival

Extent of visceral pleural invasion and the prognosis of surgically resected node-negative non-small cell lung cancer

Clinical study on postoperative recurrence in patients with pn0 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Exosomal Del 1 as a potent diagnostic marker for breast cancer : A prospective cohort study

Analysis of the outcome of young age tongue squamous cell carcinoma

A Retrospective Study of Survival and Patterns of Failure in Gastric Cancer after Adjuvant Chemoradiation

Prognostic significance of metastatic lymph node ratio: the lymph node ratio could be a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer

The Depth of Tumor Invasion is Superior to 8 th AJCC/UICC Staging System to Predict Patients Outcome in Radical Cystectomy.

Clinical Features and Survival Analysis of T1mic, a, bn0m0 Breast Cancer

Expression and significance of Bmi-1 and Ki67 in colorectal carcinoma tissues

IDENTIFICATION OF A HIGH-RISK GROUP AMONG PATIENTS WITH ORAL CAVITY SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA AND pt1 2N0 DISEASE

High ALDH1A1 expression correlates with poor survival in papillary thyroid carcinoma

Only Estrogen receptor positive is not enough to predict the prognosis of breast cancer

Diagnostic and prognostic significance of receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells in lung-cancer-associated pleural effusion

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, INDIA. Department of Pediatric Surgery, Medical Oncology, and Radiology

Chinese Journal of Cancer. Open Access ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Relapse Patterns and Outcomes Following Recurrence of Endometrial Cancer in Northern Thai Women

Xiang Hu*, Liang Cao*, Yi Yu. Introduction

Ivyspring International Publisher. Introduction. Journal of Cancer 2017, Vol. 8. Abstract

Role of Primary Resection for Patients with Oligometastatic Disease

Lower lymph node yield following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer has no clinical significance

Reevaluating the prognostic significance of male gender for papillary thyroid carcinoma and microcarcinoma: a SEER database analysis

ESD for EGC with undifferentiated histology

Is Ovarian Preservation Feasible in Early-Stage Adenocarcinoma of the Cervix?

Analysis of the prognosis of patients with testicular seminoma

Prognostic significance of overexpressed long non-coding RNA TUG1 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cancer worldwide.

Immunotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting for Melanoma: What You Need to Know

Long term survival study of de-novo metastatic breast cancers with or without primary tumor resection

Treatment and predictive factors in patients with recurrent laryngeal carcinoma: A retrospective study

Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis Correlation with Prognosis in Patients with T2 Gastric Cancer

Clinical significance and diagnostic value of serum CEA, CA19-9 and CA72-4 in patients with gastric cancer

Transcription:

Supplementary Information Prognostic Impact of Signet Ring Cell Type in Node Negative Gastric Cancer Pengfei Kong1,4,Ruiyan Wu1,Chenlu Yang1,3,Jianjun Liu1,2,Shangxiang Chen1,2, Xuechao Liu1,2, Minting Ye1,4, Min Ma1,2, Lin Jiao1, Xuan Li1, Wenzhuo He1,4, Qiong Yang1,4, Chang Jiang1,4, Fangxin Liao1,4, Youqing Zhan1,2, Zhiwei Zhou1,2, Liangping Xia*1,4, Dazhi Xu*1,2 1 State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China, 2 Department of Gastric and Pancreatic Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.3 Department of the Gynecologic Oncology surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China. 4Department of the VIP region, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China.

Supplemental Table 1. Additional comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between SRC and non-src LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between excluded and enrolled LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Table 3. First site and the timing of recurrence (n = 98). Supplemental Table 4. Total first site and the timing of recurrence (n = 138). Supplemental Table 5. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival. Supplemental Table 6. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for relapse-free survival. Supplemental Table 7. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing years of overall survival between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing years of relapse-free survival between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Figure 3. Distribution of the number of lymph nodes examined for the entire cohort of 556 patients. Supplemental Figure 4. Hematoxylin and eosin stain of different histologic type gastric carcinoma.

Variable SRC No. of (n=90) Non-SRC % No. of (n=390) % P Tumor location Upper stomach 20 22.2 131 33.6 0.044 Non-upper stomach 70 77.8 259 66.4 AJCC stage 2 29 32.2 85 21.8 0.040 1 + 3 61 67.8 305 78.2 AJCC stage 1 48 53.3 275 70.5 0.003 2 + 3 42 46.7 115 29.5 Tumor stage T 2 27 30.0 64 16.4 0.004 Non-T 2 63 70.0 326 83.6 Tumor stage T 3 29 32.2 85 21.8 0.040 Non-T 3 61 67.8 305 78.2 Tumor stage T 1a 16 17.8 185 47.4 <0.001 Non-T 1a 74 82.2 205 52.6 Abbreviation: SRC, Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition. Supplemental Table 1. Additional comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between SRC and non-src LNs negative gastric cancer patients.

Excluded Enrolled Variable No. of % No. of % P (n=76) (n=480) Age, years Mean 57 56.2 0.442 SD 11.6 12.3 Sex 0.687 Men 55 72.4 333 69.4 Women 21 27.6 147 30.6 Tumor location 0.601 Upper stomach 31 40.8 221 46.0 Middle stomach 23 30.2 111 23.1 Lower stomach 17 22.3 114 23.8 Overlapping 5 6.6 34 7.1 AJCC stage 0.347 1 45 59.2 321 66.9 2 21 27.6 116 24.2 3 10 13.2 43 8.9 Tumor grade 0.221 1 32 42.1 216 45 2 23 30.3 172 35.8 3 21 27.6 92 19.2 Tumor stage 0.129 T 1a 22 28.9 201 41.9 T 1b 8 10.5 31 6.5 T 2 18 23.7 91 19.0 T 3 17 22.4 114 23.8 T 4 11 14.5 43 8.9 Perineural invasion 0.263 Negative 48 63.2 268 55.8 Positive 28 36.8 212 44.2 Vascular invasion 0.186 Negative 63 82.9 425 88.5 Positive 13 17.1 55 11.5 Number of retrieved LNs 0.110 <15 4 5.3 10 2.1 15 72 94.7 470 97.9 Chemotherapy 0.585 Yes 24 135 No 52 345 Abbreviation: AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer. 7th edition, LNs Lymph Nodes. Supplemental Table 2. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between excluded and enrolled LNs negative gastric cancer patients.

SRC Non-SRC No. of (n=37) No. of (n=71) P Early Late Total Early Late Total Liver 14 1 15 15 5 20 0.207 Locoregional 3 1 4 1 3 4 0.486 Peritoneum 2 1 3 8 1 9 0.455 Distant LNs 6 0 6 12 4 16 0.541 Mixed type 8 1 9 14 8 22 0.220 Total 33 4 37 50 21 71 0.032 Early: within 2 years after surgery ( 2 years). Late: 4 years later after surgery ( 4 years). Mixed type: liver or Peritoneum or locoregional and distant lymph node metastasis. LNs: lymph nodes Supplemental Table 3. First site and the timing of recurrence (n = 108). SRC Non-SRC No. of (n=49) No. of (n=99) Early Late Middle Total Early Late Middle Total Liver 14 1 6 21 15 5 15 35 Locoregional 3 1 3 7 1 3 3 7 Peritoneum 2 1 1 4 8 1 2 11 Distant LNs 6 0 1 7 12 4 4 20 Mixed type 8 1 1 10 14 8 4 26 Total 33 4 12 49 48 21 28 99 Early: within 2 years after surgery ( 2 years). Late: 4 years later after surgery ( 4 years). Middle: Between 2 and 4 years. Mixed type: liver or Peritoneum or locoregional and distant lymph node metastasis. LNs: lymph nodes. Supplemental Table 4. Total first site and the timing of recurrence (n = 148).

Characteristic Hazard Ratio 95% CI P SRC histology 1.13 0.70 to 1.85 0.612 Age at diagnosis 1.03 1.01 to 1.04 0.006 Female sex 1.65 1.04 to 3.09 0.022 AJCC stage 1 1.00 <0.001 2 2.64 1.64 to 4.24 3 3.70 2.40 to 5.72 Tumor stage T 1a 1.00 <0.001 T 3 2.15 1.21 to 3.16 T 4 3.09 1.54 to 6.19 Perineural invasion 1.64 1.14 to 2.36 0.008 Vascular invasion 1.32 0.84 to 2.08 0.230 Chemotherapy 1.77 1.14 to 2.74 0.011 Abbreviation: SRC, Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition. Supplemental Table 5. Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for overall survival.

Characteristic Hazard Ratio 95% CI P SRC histology 2.37 1.42 to 4.26 0.033 Age at diagnosis 1.03 1.02 to 1.05 <0.001 AJCC stage 1 1.00 <0.001 2 2.04 1.12 to 4.26 3 3.89 2.59 to 5.84 Tumor stage T 1a 1.00 <0.001 T 3 2.88 2.04 to 4.21 T 4 5.34 3.63 to 8.48 <0.001 Perineural invasion 1.39 0.98 to 1.98 0.067 Vascular invasion 2.16 1.41 to 3.30 <0.001 Chemotherapy 1.05 0.70 to 1.59 0.802 Abbreviation: SRC, Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition. Supplemental Table 6.Multivariate analyses of prognostic factors for relapse-free survival.

Variable Age, years Diffuse No. of (n=167) Mean 56.8 SD 12.3 Non-dffuse % No. of % P (n=269) 57.7 11.0 0.448 Sex Men 122 73.1 194 72.1 0.832 Women 45 26.9 75 27.9 Tumor location Upper stomach 57 34.1 80 29.7 0.716 Middle stomach 44 26.3 74 27.5 Lower stomach 50 29.9 82 30.5 Overlapping 16 9.6 33 12.3 AJCC stage 1 107 64.1 183 68.0 0.112 2 39 23.3 68 25.3 3 21 12.6 18 6.7 Number of retrieved LNs <15 11 6.6 16 5.9 0.839 15 156 93.4 253 94.1 Chemotherapy Yes 52 31.1 71 26.4 0.325 No 115 68.9 198 73.6 Abbreviation: SRC, Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma. SD, Standard Deviation. AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer, 7th edition, LNs, Lymph Nodes. Supplemental Table 7. Comparison of clinicopathologic characteristics between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients.

Supplemental Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing years of overall survival between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients. Supplemental Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier survival curves comparing years of relapse-free survival between diffuse and non-diffuse LNs negative gastric cancer patients.

150 Frequency 100 50 0 0 20 40 60 80 Number of examied lymph nodes Supplemental Figure 3. Distribution of the number of lymph nodes examined for the entire cohort of 556 patients.

Supplemental Figure 4. Hematoxylin and eosin stain of different histologic type gastric carcinoma. (A) Grade 1 gastric carcinoma, (B) Grade 2 gastric carcinoma, (C) Grade 3 gastric carcinoma, (D) Signet ring cell gastric carcinoma.