HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS - PRISONERS

Similar documents
RESEARCH INVOLVING PRISONERS

OHRP Guidance on the Involvement of Prisoners in Research

Revised August 28, 2018

Human Research Protection Program Institutional Review Board Procedure

Florida State University Policy 7-IRB-26

SUBJECT: SJMHS Institutional Review Board(s): Vulnerable Populations - Research Involving Prisoners

Research Involving Prisoners in Non-Prison Settings: FDA and OHRP Regulations

University of Illinois Human Subjects Research Conference

I. HSC Review and Approval of Research Involving Children

IRB EXPEDITED REVIEW

IRB GRAND ROUNDS SOCIAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH: NEED TO KNOW

IRB for Humanists. Naomi E. Coll, MPH, CPH, CIP Manager of Research Integrity

Human Subjects Protection Specialist October 22 nd, 2010

Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures

Navigating the Regulatory Requirements of Pediatric Research Nathan Lee, CIP Vice Chair, Schulman IRB

MDCH IRB REVIEW APPLICATION Authority: Code of Federal Regulations Title 45 Part 46

MEDICAL RESEARCH SUMMIT CONFERENCE A REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES AND PROGRESS OF SACHRP

IRB policy and procedures 1. Institutional Review Board: Revised Policy and Procedures Elmhurst College

Ethical Principles in Clinical Research

Protecting Human Subjects In Social-Behavioral-Educational Research:

Part 115 PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT NATIONAL STANDARDS Published June 20, 2012

IMPACT OF INCLUSION/ EXCLUSION CRITERIA ON ENROLLMENT

(4) Be as detailed as necessary to provide history of work performed; and:

Understanding Minimal Risk in SBR: NRC Recommendations for Proposed Changes to the Common Rule

Sexual Abuse Prevention Plan Evaluation Report for 2014

February 6, Probate Code -- Care and Treatment for Mentally Ill Persons -- Definition of Psychologist

REGIS UNIVERSITY POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVIEW OF RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520)

Institutional Review of Research Involving Human Participants. IRB Presentation. University of Central Florida Office of Research & Commercialization

Research. + Human Subjects Protections for. IRB Review and Approval at UW. October, Bailey Bodell, CIP. Reliance Administrator

TASK FORCE ON SENTENCING REFORMS FOR OPIOID DRUG CONVICTIONS (2017)

Office of Research Compliance. Research Involving Human Subjects

Generic Drug User Fee Amendments of 2012; Regulatory Science Initiatives; Public Hearing;

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

The Cost of Imprisonment

BAPTIST HEALTH SOUTH FLORIDA INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD INVESTIGATOR RESPONSIBILITIES WHEN CONDUCTING HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Type of Review Requested:

Human Subjects Research: Overview. Colleen Kohashi and Tani Prestage Office for the Protection of Human Subjects (OPHS) February 26, 2016

HIV CRIMINALIZATION IN OHIO. Elizabeth Bonham, JD Staff Attorney, ACLU of Ohio

REQUIRED INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) EDUCATIONAL READING FOR FLETCHER SCHOOL RESEARCHERS APPLYING FOR EXEMPTION FROM IRB

SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTION PROGRAM STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES

NCI CIRB Independent Model studies is described herein.

Informed Consent and Assessment of Capacity to Consent to Research Policy

IRB FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS. 1. Who must apply for human subjects review through the IRB (Institutional Research Board)?

Substance Abuse Policy. Substance Abuse Policy for Employees and Students

12/15/2011. PSY 450 Dr. Schuetze

BRAZOS VALLEY COUNCIL ON ALCOHOL AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE BOARD POLICY SECTION 600: CRIMINAL JUSTICE. Policy Statement

Human Research Participant Protection Program

Department of the Navy Human Research Protection Program

Determining risk for research involving children. Angela Bain, IRB Specialist

STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENT PROTOCOL FOR SEXUALLY VIOLENT PREDATOR EVALUATIONS

IRB, IDEATE, AND HSR. February, 2018 Manuel Gonzalez

Self-Consent for HIV Prevention Research Involving Sexual and Gender Minority Youth

Public Relations Statement

OHIO LEGISLATIVE SERVICE COMMISSION

Protection of Research Subjects: The IRB Process

Substance-Exposed Newborns

Human Participants Protection Guidebook. Stephens College 1200 East Broadway Avenue Columbia, Missouri (573)

Substance-Exposed Newborns

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD GUIDANCE ON ELECTRONIC INFORMED CONSENT

ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HUMAN SERVICES Blanca Rubio, Chair AB 2702 (McCarty) As Amended April 2, 2018

Language Assistance Plan

INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD (IRB) PROCESS AND GUIDELINES FOR CONDUCTING RESEARCH AT ORANGE COAST COLLEGE

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

Infectious Disease The Public Health Response

DRUG POLICY TASK FORCE

DEFINING RESEARCH WITH HUMAN SUBJECTS - SBE

I. POLICY: DEFINITIONS: Applicant: Any individual who applies for employment with the Department of Juvenile Justice.

Title 32: PROFESSIONS AND OCCUPATIONS

Placement and Treatment of Mentally Ill Offenders - Legislation and Practice in EU-Member States

CHAPTER Committee Substitute for Committee Substitute for House Bill No. 321

Act 443 of 2009 House Bill 1379

EXEMPT RESEARCH. Investigators should contact the IRB Office if there are questions about whether an amendment consists

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR CY 2019 FUNDING. Issue Date: Monday, July 30, Submission Deadline: 5:00 p.m., Friday, August 24, 2018

TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?

CHAPTER 2 NETWORK PROVIDER/SERVICE DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS

Dental Amalgam Rule Update

Levels of IRB Review

Model Intervention for Students with Substance Abuse Problems Act

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its medical

POL HR CDL DRUG AND ALCOHOL TESTING PLAN Page 1 of 8 POLICY. See Also: POL-0409-HR; PRO HR; PRO HR Res

Grievance Procedure Last Revision: April 2018

Guidance for CPD Providers. Information and help for organisations providing CPD for chiropractors

29 th Judicial District Language Access Plan

SACI ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE PREVENTION POLICY

EXCEPT FROM THE FOLLOWING: TITLE 74. STATE GOVERNMENT

POLICIES GOVERNING PROCEDURES FOR THE USE OF ANIMALS IN RESEARCH AND TEACHING AT WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY and REVIEW OF HUMAN SUBJECT RESEARCH

Protecting Human Subjects

Pink Bollworm Control Act

Policies and Procedures Manual Human Subjects Institutional Review Board (IRB)

Business Impact Analysis

ADULT DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

Department of Criminal Justice

A SYSTEM IN CRISIS MENTAL ILLNESS AND THE JUSTICE SYSTEM

For An Act To Be Entitled. Subtitle

Final Rule Material: New and Revised Definitions

IRB Reviewer Worksheet for Expedited Reviews

Nevertheless, NSP grantees may retain some or all program income in the NSP program;

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Sex Crimes: Definitions and Penalties Arkansas

Transcription:

2014 CTN Web Seminar Series HUMAN RESEARCH PROTECTIONS - PRISONERS Julia Gorey, JD Division of Policy and Assurances Office of Human Research Protections Produced by: NIDA CTN CCC Training Office "This training has been funded in whole or in part with Federal funds from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, under Contract No.HHSN271201000024C."

Objectives: Briefly describe the history of 45 CFR 46 subpart C Explain the regulatory interpretation of prisoner under subpart C Explain permissible categories of research at 45 CFR 46.306, and the Epidemiological Waiver Describe requirement for a prisoner representative and IRB review Describe the requirement for certification, the process of certification, and the necessary contents of the certification package 2

HISTORY AND DEMOGRAPHICS 3

4

Defense Use of Research in U.S. Prisons Malaria experiments at Stateville Penitentiary, Illinois, 1944 5

The Demographics of Drug Testing in Prison (Circa 1975) 16 of 51 pharmaceutical companies used prisoners as subjects 14 of the 16 companies conducted Phase I drug testing using prisoners 3600 prisoners were involved in 100 protocols studying 71 substances 9 of the 14 companies used prisoners only for Phase I testing 8 state and 6 county or municipal prisons were used as research sites The Jackson State Prison had the largest research operation National Commission s Report on Research Involving Prisoners, p.31, 1976 6

"... fine experimental material... and much cheaper than chimpanzees." "All I saw before me were acres of skin"... "It was like a farmer seeing a fertile field for the first time". 7

8

The National Commission Opines. There are 2 basic ethical dilemmas concerning the use of prisoners as research subjects: 1) whether prisoners bear a fair share of the burdens and receive a fair share of the benefits of research; and 2) whether prisoners are, in the words of the Nuremburg Code, so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice - that is, whether prisoners can truly give voluntary informed consent to participate in research. National Commission s Report on Research Involving Prisoners, p5, 1976 9

10

REGULATORY INTERPRETATION OF PRISONER 1 ST DETERMINATION 11

Prisoner Definition- 45 CFR 46.303(c) "Prisoner" means any individual involuntarily confined or detained in a penal institution. sentenced under a criminal or civil statute individuals detained in other facilities by virtue of statutes or commitment procedures which provide alternatives to criminal prosecution or incarceration in a penal institution, and, individuals detained pending arraignment, trial, or sentencing. 12

45 CFR 46 Subpart C 1st Determination: Does the study involve prisoners, as defined in Subpart C? 13

14

15

Who is not a prisoner? Voluntarily entered treatment Released from prison to halfway houses Persons court-adjudicated to attend nonresidential treatment programs as alternative to incarceration while living in community Civilly committed due to danger to self or others 16

2 nd DETERMINATION: DOES THE RESEARCH FALL UNDER ONE OF THE CATEGORES IN SUBPART C? 17

46.306(a)(2) Categories Category (i) study of possible causes, effects, and processes of incarceration and of criminal behavior Category (ii) study of prisons as institutional structures or of prisoners as incarcerated persons Note: Category (i) and (ii) must be no more than minimal risk. 18

Subpart C Minimal Risk Differs From Subpart A "Minimal risk" is the probability and magnitude of physical or psychological harm that is normally encountered in the daily lives, or in the routine medical, dental, or psychological examination of healthy persons. 45 CFR 46.303(d) Note: Point of reference is healthy, un-incarcerated persons. 19

Examining addiction treatment These images of the dopamine transporter show the brain's remarkable potential to recover, at least partially, after a long abstinence from drugs - in this case, methamphetamine. Source: The Journal of Neuroscience, 21(23):9414-9418. 2001 20

46.306(a)(2) Categories Category (iii) Research on conditions particularly affecting prisoners as a class. The regulations provide these examples: Vaccine trials and other research on hepatitis which is much more prevalent in prisons than elsewhere; and Research on social and psychological problems such as alcoholism, drug addiction, and sexual assaults Note: Secretarial consultation required for all category (iii) HHS funded research. 21

46.306(a)(2) Categories Category (iv) Research on practices, both innovative and accepted, which have the intent and reasonable probability of improving the health or well-being of the subject Note: Secretarial consultation required for category (iv) HHS funded research where subjects assigned to control groups may not benefit. 22

Secretarial Consultation With Experts the study may proceed only after the Secretary has consulted with appropriate experts, including experts in penology, medicine, and ethics, and published notice, in the Federal Register, of the intent to approve such research Process usually takes at least 6 months. Note: Not required for non-hhs conducted or funded research. Institutions may convene an equivalent panel. 23

Questions??? 24

Epidemiologic Waiver Functions as a very narrow 5 th category! For studies in which the sole purposes are: 1. To describe the prevalence or incidence of a disease, OR 2. To study potential risk factor associations for a disease Must be minimal risk, prisoners cannot be sole focus, but IRB must still certify to OHRP! 25

26

IRB Must Include Prisoner Rep! 45 CFR 46.304 At least one member of the Board shall be a prisoner or prisoner representative with appropriate background and experience to serve in that capacity Must be full voting member listed on IRB s roster Appropriate qualifications will depending on type of research involved 27

Other Determinations Required of IRBs as Part of Subpart C Review: In addition to choosing one of the four permissible categories of research involving prisoners, the IRB must make six other specific findings. 45 CFR 46.305(a)(2)-(7) 28

45 CFR 46.305(a)(2)-(7) 1. Permissible category of research 2. Possible advantages associated with research participation are not of such a magnitude that his/her ability to weigh the risks is impaired 3. The risks are commensurate with risks that would be accepted by non prisoners. 4. Selection of subjects within the prison is fair and immune from arbitrary intervention by prison authorities or prisoners. 5. The information is presented in language which is understandable to the subject population. 29

46.305 (cont.) 6. Assurance exists that parole boards will not consider research participation in parole decisions; prisoners are informed in advance that participation in the research will not affect parole. 7. Adequate provision has been made for follow-up care. 46.305(c) Certification requirement The institution shall certify to the Secretary that the duties of the Board under this section have been fulfilled. 30

CERTIFICATION AND REQUIREMENTS 31

Prisoner Research Certification to OHRP 1) IRB reviews, makes Subpart C findings 2) Institution/IRB sends prisoner research certification letter and research proposal to OHRP* 3) OHRP makes determination regarding categories 4) OHRP sends determination letter to institution/irb and grant officer 45 CFR 46.306(a)(2) 45 CFR 46.305(c) 45 CFR 46.306(a)(1) *Note: Required only for HHS conducted or funded studies. 32

If a subject becomes a Subpart C prisoner after enrollment The study must be: reviewed by IRB under Subpart C certified to OHRP determined by OHRP to fall into one of the four permissible categories. IRB Chair can grant temporary approval for the subject to remain on study 33

What s Different about Subpart C? The exemptions don t apply Must have a Prisoner Representative Study must fit into 46.306 category Must send subpart C certification to OHRP and wait for response before starting research Prisoner Research Certification http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/populations/prisoncertl et.html Triggered regardless of when a subject becomes a prisoner Emergency waiver of IC not permitted 34

WHERE is my approval? At least 50% of certification requests require OHRP follow-up. Please be sure to include: Contact information! FWA#, IRB# Date of subpart C review Protocol and consent/assent forms Name of funding program officer 46.306(a)(2) category determination Grant title and grant number 35

On the OHRP Web Site: Julia Gorey, J.D. (240) 453-8141 Prisoner FAQs http://www.dhhs.gov/ohrp/ May 23, 2003 OHRP Prisoner Research Guidance document http://ohrp.osophs.dhhs.gov/humansubjects/ guidance/prisoner.htm 36

Q&A Questions / Comments Alternatively, questions can be directed to the presenter by sending an email to CTNtraining@emmes.com. 37

THANK YOU FOR YOUR PARTICIPATION 38

Survey Reminder The NIDA CCC encourages all to complete the survey issued to participants directly following this webinar session, as this is the primary collective tool for rating your experience with this and other webinars, and for communicating the interests and needs of CTN members and associates. Upcoming Webinar 39

A copy of this presentation will be available electronically after this session. http://ctndisseminationlibrary.org 40