Predicting how polyphenol antioxidants prevent DNA damage by binding to iron

Similar documents
Predicting How Polyphenol Antioxidants Prevent DNA Damage by Binding to Iron

Chemical Biology of Tea Catechins

HPLC Column for Structural Isomers COSMOSIL Cholester

Follow this and additional works at:

Follow this and additional works at: Part of the Inorganic Chemistry Commons

Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, , P. R.

Protein Cleavage Due to Pro-oxidative Activity in Some Spices

Flavone: the Molecular and Mechanistic Study of How a Simple Flavonoid Protects DNA from Oxidative Damage.

Stability of Green Tea Catechins in the Solid Phase and Aqueous Solutions

Mechanisms and Structural Specificity of Hydrogen Peroxide Formation during Oxidation of Catechins

Final Year BSc Practical Electrochemical Determination of Glucose. Dr. Toby Jenkins, October 2004

PHENOLIC BIOSENSOR BASED ON CARBON PASTE ELECTRODE MODIFIED WITH CRUDE TISSUE

3.1 Background. Preformulation Studies

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. Direct Observation of the Local Reaction Environment during the Electrochemical Reduction of CO 2

Smart Probe for Uric Acid Detection

Supporting Information. Magnetic Field and Chirality Effects on Electrochemical Charge Transfer Rates: Spin. Dependent Electrochemistry

Characterization of the DNA-mediated Oxidation of Dps, a Bacterial Ferritin

The Bioavailability of Dietary Flavonoids & Related Phenolic Compounds. Dietary phenolics. Feeding Studies. Stomach. Tissues. bile.

Cholesterol determination using protein-templated fluorescent gold nanocluster probes

Annexure III SOLUTIONS AND REAGENTS

Technical Report Effect of Cola Acuminata and Camellia Sinensis Mixed Extracts on the Corrosion Inhibition of Mild Steel in 0.

Electrochemical Behavior of Cu 2+ -Histidine Complexes on a Glassy Carbon Electrode

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Electrochemical Oxidation of Quercetin

Reduction of p-benzoquinone on lipid-modified electrodes: effect of the alkyl chain length of lipids on the electron transfer reactions

Supplementary Figures

An Investigative Study of Reactions Involving Glucosinolates and Isothiocyanates

CHEM104 Exp. 9 Phytochemical Antioxidants with Potential Benefits in Foods Part I. 1

The Electroanalytical Determination of Sodium Borohydride Using a Gold Electrode

Supporting Information: Investigation into the Sources of Biochar Water Soluble Organic Compounds and Their

Rapid and sensitive UHPLC screening for water soluble vitamins in sports beverages

Plasmonic blood glucose monitor based on enzymatic. etching of gold nanorods

Stopped-Flow and Spectrophotometric Study on Radical Scavenging by Tea Catechins and the Model Compounds

Reduction of Catechin Astringency by the Complexation of Gallate-Type Catechins with Pectin

Antioxidant Activity and Lipoxygenase Enzyme Inhibition Assay with Total Flavonoid Content from Garcinia hombroniana Pierre Leaves

Chemistry 1120 Exam 1 Study Guide

Effects of epigallocatechin gallate and quercetin on oxidative damage to cellular DNA

Flavonoids and their free radical reactions

Effects of Catechins on Superoxide and Hydroxyl Radical

Total phenolic content - Folin-Ciocalteu reducing capacity (FCR assay) Antiradical activity against DPPH radical

Electrochemical Oxidation of Rutin

The Pennsylvania State University. The Graduate School. Department of Food Science EFFECT OF THIOL-QUINONE REACTIONS ON

Bisphenol A in Drinking Water

INVESTIGATION OF CHLORINATED METHANES TREATABILITY USING ACTIVATED SODIUM PERSULFATE

A pillar[2]arene[3]hydroquinone which can self-assemble to a molecular zipper in the solid state

Supporting Information. Controlled Nucleation and Growth of DNA Tile Arrays within Prescribed DNA Origami Frames and Their Dynamics

Trans Fat Determination in the Industrially Processed Edible Oils By Transmission FT-IR Spectroscopy By

Chemistry 212. Experiment 3 ANALYSIS OF A SOLID MIXTURE LEARNING OBJECTIVES. - learn to analyze a solid unknown with volumetric techniques.

ab65656 Ascorbic Acid Assay Kit (Colorimetric)

Capillary electrophoresis facilitates determination of metal complex stoichiometry by Job s method of continuous variation

601 S. College Avenue Kaitlin L. Siela Columbia, MO Telephone: (816)

DiscovIR-LC. Application Note 026 May 2008 READING TEA LEAVES SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

Supporting Information. Selective CO2 Reduction on Zinc Electrocatalyst: The Effect of Zinc Oxidation State Induced by Pretreatment Environment

Chemistry 201 Laboratory Fall 2006 page 1 of 4

Supporting Information

Isolation, Purification, and Characterization of Horseradish Peroxidase (HRP) J. Kane, T. Schweickart

Linear sweep voltammetry as a technique to characterize mining wastes

Supplementary Figure 1. DTPA does not interfere with the activity of catalase. Dependency of CAT activity on DTPA concentration at 25 C.

Available Online through Research Article

Supporting Information. Interphase Enzyme Kinetics of an Integral Membrane Kinase by. Time-Resolved Solid-state NMR. contributed equally

Available online Research Article

Iodide in Milk. Electrochemistry Discover the difference

Supplementary Material

Synergistic effects of antioxidative peptides from rice bran

NEW INSIGHTS INTO THE CHEMISTRY AND FUNCTIONS OF COENZYME Q

Elementary tetrahelical protein design for diverse oxidoreductase functions

Non-aqueous Phase Titration for Total Acid Number of Crude Oil

Determination of glucose in human urine by cyclic voltammetry method using gold electrode

Supplementary Figure 1. Ent inhibits LPO activity in a dose- and time-dependent fashion.

Sulfate Radical-Mediated Degradation of Sulfadiazine by CuFeO 2 Rhombohedral Crystal-Catalyzed Peroxymonosulfate: Synergistic Effects and Mechanisms

Introduction. Cell Biology OLM

Use of double- stranded DNA mini- circles to characterize the covalent topoisomerase- DNA complex

Supporting information

Role of Paired Box9 (PAX9) (rs ) and Muscle Segment Homeobox1 (MSX1) (581C>T) Gene Polymorphisms in Tooth Agenesis

Adsorptive voltammetric determination of chlordiazepoxide in pure and dosage forms

User s Manual and Instructions

Maly J., Masojidek J., Pinto V., Masci A. Sugiura M. and Pilloton R.

igem2013 Microbiology BMB SDU

Kinetics and Mechanistic Studies on the Reaction between Cytochrome c and Tea Catechins

Flavonoid structures. Other dietary polyphenols with biological activity

In Vitro Antioxidant Activity of some Edibles Bearing Nutritional Value

Relationship in between Chemical Oxidation and Browning of Flavanols

Investigating the antioxidant properties of oxo-sulfur compounds on metal-mediated DNA damage. RIA R. RAMOUTAR and JULIA L.

Graphene Quantum Dots-Band-Aids Used for Wound Disinfection

Figure 8.1: Principle reaction behind DPPH assay Unnati Shah Institute of Pharmacy, Nirma University-Ph.D. thesis 136

Ascorbic Acid Assay Kit

Kit for assay of thioredoxin

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) A unique dansyl-based chromogenic chemosensor for rapid and ultrasensitive hydrazine detection

Page 1 of 5 Biochemistry I Fall 2017 Practice for Exam2 Dr. Stone Name

MEDAK DIST. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE, INDIA. Research Article RECEIVED ON ACCEPTED ON

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION UV SPECTROPHOTOMETRIC METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF ATENOLOL IN PURE MATERIALS AND PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE

Qualitative and quantitative determination of phenolic antioxidant compounds in red wine and fruit juice with the Agilent 1290 Infinity 2D-LC Solution

Lentiviral Delivery of Combinatorial mirna Expression Constructs Provides Efficient Target Gene Repression.

6 CHAPTER-6 TOTAL PHENOLIC AND FLAVONOID CONTENT DETERMINATION

ab Lipoxygenase Inhibitor Screening Assay Kit

Research Article GALLIC ACID AND FLAVONOID ACTIVITIES OF AMARANTHUS GANGETICUS

SUPPLEMENTAL FIGURE LEGENDS

NOVEL SUBSTRATES OF YEAST ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE--4. ALLYL ALCOHOL AND ETHYLENE GLYCOL

CHAPTER 7: REAGENTS AND SOLUTIONS

Mouse Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) Fluorescent Detection Kit

Transcription:

Predicting how polyphenol antioxidants prevent DNA damage by binding to iron Nathan R. Perron, James N. Hodges, Michael Jenkins, and Julia L. Brumaghim Department of Chemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 963-973 SUPPORTING INFORMATION Gel electrophoresis results for phenolic compounds. Gel electrophoresis experiments of DNA damage inhibition by the twelve compounds shown in Figure are shown in Figure S with average tabulated values for the DNA band intensities observed in the electrophoresis experiments given in Tables S-S. Dose-response curves showing the percent inhibition of DNA damage vs. log concentration of phenolic compound (in µm) are provided in Figure S. Reaction components for gel electrophoresis lanes. In order to obtain results for the entire concentration range, several electrophoresis experiments had to be performed for each compound. As a result, different control lanes with iron and H O (lanes marked A, B, C, etc.) were used for different concentration ranges of each polyphenol compound. Only one of these lanes is shown in the gel images (Figures S and S), while all are shown in the tables (Tables S-S3). Additional control lanes (p-p3) were needed to ensure that DNA damage did not occur with the added reaction components indicated. The reaction lanes correspond to their specific Fe + /H O control lane. Control lanes: MW = kb DNA ladder; p = plasmid DNA, 3 mm NaCl, mm ethanol, and mm MES buffer; p = same as p with 5 µm H O ; p3 = same as p with 5 µm polyphenol compound; A, B, C, etc. = same as p with µm Fe + (or µm [Fe(EDTA)] - ). Reaction lanes: #A, #B, #C, etc. = same as lanes A, B, C, etc. with indicated amount of polyphenol compound given in tables S-S3.

MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B C MW p p p3 A A A 3A B A 5A 6A 7A MW p p p3 A A A 3A B A 5A 6A 7A [EC] [ECG] [EGC] Figure Sa. Lanes A-5A, -, C: Increasing concentration EC:. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm, 5 µm and µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, -, C correspond to tabulation of data for EC. Figure Sb. Lanes A-3A, -, A-7A: Increasing concentration ECG:. µm,. µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, µm and µm, respectively. Lanes A-3A, -, A-7A correspond to tabulation of data for ECG. Figure Sc. Lanes A-3A, -, A-7A: Increasing concentration EGC:. µm,. µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 5 µm and µm, respectively. Lanes A-3A, -, A-7A correspond to tabulation of data for EGC. MW p p p3 A A A B C C3C C 5C D D 3D D 5D MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B MW p p p3 A A A 3A B A 5A 6A [EGCG] [GA] [MEGA] Figure Sd. Lanes A-A, -, C-5C, D-5D: Increasing concentration EGCG:. µm,.5 µm,. µm,. µm,. µm,.5 µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-A, -, C-5C, D-5D correspond to tabulation of data for EGCG. Figure Se. Lanes A-5A, -: Increasing concentration GA:. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, - correspond to tabulation of data for GA. Figure Sf. Lanes A-3A, -, A-6A: Increasing concentration MEGA:. µm,. µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-3A, -, A-6A correspond to tabulation of data for MEGA. Figure S. Gel electrophoresis images of polyphenols under Fenton reaction conditions ( µm Fe + + 5 µm H O ) in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.): a = ( )-epicatechin (EC), b = ( )-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), c = ( )-epigallocatechin (EGC), d = ( )-epigallocatechin-3-gallate(egcg), e = gallic acid (GA), f = methyl-3,,5- trihydroxybenzoate (MEGA) % Agarose gel imaged with ethidium bromide. Control lanes: MW = kb MW ladder, p = plasmid DNA (p), p = p + 5 µm H O, p3 = p + largest concentration of phenolic compound + 5 µm H O, A = p + µm Fe + + 5 µm H O.

MW p p p3 A A A B 3A A 5A C MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B C C 3C C 5C MW p p p3 A A A B C C 3C C D D 3D [MEPCA] [Myr] [PrEGA] Figure Sg. Lanes A-A, -, 3A-5A, C: Increasing concentration MEPCA:. µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 5 µm and µm, respectively. Lanes A- A, -, 3A-5A, C correspond to tabulation of data for MEPCA. Figure Sh. Lanes A-5A, -, C-5C: Increasing concentration Myr:. µm,. µm,. µm,.5 µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, -, C-5C correspond to tabulation of data for Myr. Figure Si. Lanes A-A, -B, C-C, D-3D: Increasing concentration PrEGA:. µm,. µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-A, -B, C-C, D-3D correspond to tabulation of data for PrEGA. MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B C [PCA] MW p p p3 A A A 3A A B C C 3C C 5C [Q] MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B 6B [VA] Figure Sj. Lanes A-5A, -, C: Increasing concentration PCA:. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm, 5 µm and µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, -, C correspond to tabulation of data for PCA. Figure Sk. Lanes A-5A, -, C-5C: Increasing concentration Q:. µm,. µm,. µm,.5 µm,. µm,. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, -, C-5C correspond to tabulation of data for Q. Figure Sl. Lanes A-5A, -6B: Increasing concentration VA:. µm, µm, µm, µm, 5 µm, µm, µm, 3 µm, µm, 5 µm and 793.3 µm, respectively. Lanes A-5A, -6B correspond to tabulation of data for VA. Figure S (continued). Gel electrophoresis images of polyphenols under Fenton reaction conditions ( µm Fe + + 5 µm H O ) in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.): g = methyl-3,-dihydroxybenzoate (MEPCA), h = myricetin (Myr), i = n-propyl gallate (PrEGA), j = protocatechuic acid (PCA), k = quercetin (Q), l = vanillic acid (VA). % Agarose gel imaged with ethidium bromide. Control lanes: MW = kb MW ladder, p = plasmid DNA (p), p = p + 5 µm H O, p3 = p + largest concentration of phenolic compound + 5 µm H O, A = p + µm Fe + + 5 µm H O.

Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for ( )-epicatechin (EC) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration EC, µm Fe + + H O A None 7. ± 3.55 9.8 ± 3.55 A A 3A A b 5A Fe + + H O B. 5 None 5. ±.5 3.8 ±.6 5.7 ± 3. 8.8 ± 8. 5.6 ±.96 8.3 ±.6 9.6 ±.5 96. ±.6 9.3 ± 3. 9. ± 8. 5. ±.96 5.7 ±.6 -. ±.5 -. ± 5.88 -.8 ±.9 -. ±.5 3. ± 5. B Fe + + H O C 3 5 None 7.9 ±.5 87. ±.99 89. ±.85 9. ±.6 9. ±.6 9.9 ± c 8. ±.5.9 ±.99.8 ±.85 9.6 ±.6 7.8 ±.6 7. ± c 7. ±.53 9.8 ±.76 9. ±.93 96. ±.36 98. ±.83 C 87. ±.37.6 ±.37. ±.95 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Lane A was calculated based on one additional replacement Fe + + H O lane and µm EC lane (not shown), which causes the raw data of % Supercoiled and to appear to have an incorrect value. However, the % Damage Inhibition has been corrected for this and represents the true for all three trials. c Standard deviation for this gel lane could not be calculated because all three trials of µm EC were on the same gel, and thus the calculations were based on only one Fe + + H O lane. Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for ( )-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES (ph = 6.). a Concentration ECG, µm Fe + + H O A A None.. ±.77 3.9 ±.8 95.9 ±.77 96. ±.8 -. ±.75 A 3A Fe + + H O B.. None. ±.77 5. ±.99 9. ±.8 95.9 ±.77 9.9 ±.99 9.6 ±.8. ±.3. ±.6 B b A 5A 6A b. 5 5 7. ±.73 5. ±.6 57. ±.7 78.9 ±.9 83.5 ±.5 83. ±.3 8.6 ±.98 8.8 ±.6 83. ±.73 5.9 ±.6 3. ±.7. ±.9 6.5 ±.5 6.8 ±.3 7. ±.98 7. ±.6. ±.57 7.9 ±. 63.8 ±.3 93. ±.86 99.5 ±.5.3 ±.7 99.6 ±. 99.7 ±.87 7A 8.8 ±. 7. ±. 99.8 ±.69 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Lanes and 6A were calculated based on one additional replacement Fe + + H O lane and µm ECG or 5 µm ECG lane (not shown), respectively which causes the raw data of % Supercoiled and to appear to have an incorrect value. However, the has been corrected for this and represents the true for all three trials.

Table S3: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for ( )-epigallocatechin (EGC) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration EGC, µm Fe + + H O A None 3. ±.96 96.8 ±.96 A..8 ±.39 97. ±.39 -. ±.3 A. 3. ±.6 96.6 ±.6.3 ±.8 3A. 3.3 ± 3.6 96.7 ± 3.6. ±. Fe + + H O B None 7.5 ± 5.7 8.5 ± 5.7. 7. ±.5 8.8 ±.5 -.5 ±.6 B 9.3 ± 5.87 7.7 ± 5.87 7. ±. 36.8 ± 6.89 63. ± 6.89 7.9 ±. 5.7 ±.6 7.3 ±.6 5.8 ±.8 5 77.9 ±.. ±. 87. ±.86 A 76. ±. 3.8 ±. 9.7 ±. 5A 83. ±.58 6.8 ±.58.3 ± 3.73 6A 5 8.3 ±. 7.7 ±. 99.3 ± 3. 7A 8.7 ±.9 7.3 ±.9 99.7 ±.8 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown.

Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for ( )-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration EGCG, µm Fe + + H O A None. ± 7.6 9. ± 7.6 A A Fe + + H O B..5 None 9.6 ± 6.36.8 ± 6.3.5 ±.7 9. ± 6.36 89. ± 6.3 95.5 ±.7 -.5 ±.75. ±.3 B Fe + + H O C....5. None 6.8 ±.3 8.5 ±. 9.8 ± 3.6.7 ±.5 5. ± 3.9 9. ± 7. 93. ±.3 9.5 ±. 9. ± 3.6 88.3 ±.5 8.9 ± 3.9 9.8 ± 7..5 ±.3.3 ±.9 5.8 ± 5. 7.8 ± 3.83.5 ±.6 C b C 3C C 5C. 5 8.5 ± 3.77 6.3 ±.3 76.5 ±.69 87. ±.9 9. ±.53 7.5 ± 3.77 35.7 ±.3 3.5 ±.69.8 ±.9 8.8 ±.53 7. ±. 65. ±. 8. ±.75 9.9 ±.67 97.7 ±.9 Fe + + H O D None 6.5 ± 3.9 93.5 ± 3.9 D D 3D D 5D 3 5 9.5 ±.56 9.8 ±.8 9.3 ±.96 93.3 ±.6 95. ±.7 7.5 ±.56 8. ±.8 7.7 ±.96 6.7 ±.6 5. ±.7 98.7 ±.9 98. ±. 98.5 ±.36 99.7 ±.7.5 ±.6 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Lane C was calculated based on one additional replacement Fe + + H O lane and. µm EGCG lane (not shown), which causes the raw data of % Supercoiled and to appear to have an incorrect value. However, the % Damage Inhibition has been corrected for this and represents the true for all three trials.

Table S5: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for gallic acid (GA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration GA, µm Fe + + H O A None. ±.3 99.6 ±.3 A A 3A A 5A Fe + + H O B. 5 None.9 ±.5 3. ±.6 6.5 ±. 37. ±.93 87. ±.86 7.3 ± 6.33 98. ±.5 96.6 ±.6 93.5 ±. 63. ±.93.6 ±.86 9.7 ± 6.33.6 ±.36 3. ±.9 6.3 ±.6 37.8 ±.96 89.8 ±.3 B 3 5 88.8 ± 3. 93. ±.6 93.9 ±.9 96. ±.37 95.8 ±.9. ± 3. 6.9 ±.6 6. ±.9. ±.37. ±.9 93.8 ± 3.3 98.6 ±.33 99.7 ±.33.8 ±.9.7 ±.68 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. Table S6: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for methyl-3,,5-trihydroxybenzoate (MEGA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration MEGA, µm Fe + + H O A None.9 ±.9 97. ±.9 A A 3A Fe + + H O B... None 3.8 ±.. ±.55 8.9 ±.83.3 ±.53 96. ±. 97.6 ±.55 9. ±.83 99.7 ±.53. ±.6 -.6 ±.9 7. ±.3 B A 5A 6A. 5 5.8 ± 3.7 3.9 ± 5.6 8.7 ±.5 76. ±.58 96.8 ±. 87. ±.6 86.9 ±.5 87. ±.77 95. ± 3.7 68. ± 5.6 5.3 ±.5. ±.58 3. ±..6 ±.6 3. ±.5.8 ±.77.6 ± 3.38 3.7 ± 5.58 5. ±.5 78.5 ±.95. ±.3. ±.9 99.5 ±.7 99.7 ±.6 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown.

Table S7: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for methyl-3,-dihydroxybenzoate (MEPCA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration MEPCA, µm Fe + + H O A None 8.7 ± 8.95 7.3 ± 8.95 A A b Fe + + H O B.. None 7.3 ±. 3.6 ± 6..8 ±.7 7.7 ±. 69. ± 6. 87. ±.7 -. ±.58 -. ±. B 3A A 5A Fe + + H O C. 5 5 None.7 ±.. ±.59 7. ±.9.9 ±.6 78.8 ±.9 8.6 ±.5 8.8 ±.8 85.3 ±.8 3.5 ± c 87.3 ±. 78.6 ±.59 73. ±.9 57. ±.6. ±.9 8. ±.5 5. ±.8.7 ±.8 65.5 ± c -. ±.96.5 ±.9 7.3 ±.3 36.6 ±.6 8. ± 3. 9. ±.8 97.9 ±. 98.8 ±. C 87.6 ±.6. ±.6 99.3 ±. a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Lane A was calculated based on one additional replacement Fe + + H O lane and. µm MEPCA lane (not shown), which causes the raw data of % Supercoiled and to appear to have an incorrect value. However, the % Damage Inhibition has been corrected for this and represents the true for all three trials. c Standard deviation for this gel lane could not be calculated because all three trials of µm MEPCA were on the same gel, and thus the calculations were based on only one Fe + + H O lane.

Table S8: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for myricetin (Myr) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration Myr, µm Fe + + H O A None. ±.56 97.6 ±.56 A A 3A A 5A Fe + + H O B....5. None.7 ±.6.3 ±.9 3. ±.9.8 ±.8. ±..7 ± 9.99 97.3 ±.6 97.7 ±.9 96.9 ±.9 98. ±.8 97.6 ±. 79.3 ± 9.99. ±. -. ±.7.9 ±. -.7 ±.88. ±.7 B Fe + + H O C. 5 None.5 ± 8.7 57.9 ± 3.6 7.9 ±. 9.7 ±.66 93.7 ±. 5.8 ± 3.6 75.5 ± 8.7. ± 3.6 5. ±. 7.3 ±.66 6.3 ±. 8. ± 3.6 5.3 ±. 5.7 ± 3.7 75. ± 3.76. ±.55.9 ±.33 C 93. ±. 7. ±. 99.9 ±.3 C 3C C 5C 3 5 9.5 ±.57 93.5 ±.3 93. ±.69 9. ±.86 7.5 ±.57 6.5 ±.3 6.8 ±.69 6. ±.86 98.6 ±.5. ±.5.3 ±.9. ±.37 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown.

Table S9: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for protocatechuic acid (PCA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration PCA, µm Fe + + H O A None. ±. 99.8 ±. A A 3A A 5A Fe + + H O B. 5 None.3 ±.5.5 ±.3 3.6 ±.78 8. ±.9 67. ±.3 5.3 ±.6 99.7 ±.9 98.5 ±.3 96. ±.78 9.8 ±.9 3.9 ±.3 9.7 ±.6. ±.. ±. 3.6 ±.95 8. ±.5 69.6 ±.33 B Fe + + H O C 3 5 None 79.7 ±.7 9. ±.7 9.6 ±.6 9.8 ±. 96. ±.66 95.3 ± b.3 ±.7 9.9 ±.7 7. ±.6 5. ±.. ±.66.7 ± b 83. 6 ±.6 95. ±.6 98. ±.6.5 ±.77.9 ±.58 C 87. ±.37.6 ±.37.7 ±.99 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Standard deviation for this gel lane could not be calculated because all three trials of µm PCA were on the same gel, and thus the calculations were based on only one Fe + + H O lane. Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for n-propyl gallate (PrEGA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration PrEGA, µm Fe + + H O A None 6.8 ± b 93. ± b A. 7. ±.9 93. ±.9.3 ±.8 A. 7.3 ±.76 9.7 ±.76.7 ±.5 Fe + + H O B None.7 ± b 89.3 ± b..3 ±.5 88.7 ±.5.8 ±.7 B. 3. ±.9 86.9 ±.9 3.3 ±.66 Fe + + H O C None 6.7 ±.56 93.3 ±.56 C 5. ±.78 7.8 ±.78.7 ±.76 C 39.9 ±.33 6. ±.33.5 ±.39 3C 68. ± 3.3 3. ± 3.3 7.9 ±. C 5 86.6 ±.3 3. ±.3 97.7 ±.77 Fe + + H O D None 5. ± 3. 9.9 ± 3. D 8.7 ±.3 5.3 ±.3 99.3 ±.65 D 85.9 ±.57. ±.57.7 ±.9 3D 5 8.8 ±.93 5. ±.93 99. ±.35 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. b Standard deviation for these gel lanes could not be calculated because all three trials of.,.,., and. µm PrEGA were on single gels, and thus the calculations were based on only one Fe + + H O lane.

Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for quercetin (Q) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration Q, µm Fe + + H O A None 6.9 ±.68 83. ±.68 A A 3A A Fe + + H O B....5 None 6.9 ±.6 9.9 ±.68.3 ±.96. ±.7 3. ±.78 83. ±.6 8. ±.68 78.7 ±.96 79.8 ±.7 69.6 ±.78. ±.8 -. ±. 5.7 ±.8.5 ±.97 B Fe + + H O C. 5 None 3.6 ±. 37.9 ±.. ±.98 57.9 ±. 8. ±.3. ±.9 67. ±. 6. ±. 59.8 ±.98. ±. 9.9 ±.3 59.6 ±.9.8 ±.5 3.8 ±.8 7.9 ±.89 5.3 ± 3.6 9. ±.9 C 9.8 ±.8 9. ±.8 96.6 ±.97 C 3C C 5C 3 5 9.3 ±.3 9. ±. 9.5 ±.58 9.5 ±.96 8.7 ±.3 7.8 ±. 7.5 ±.58 5.5 ±.96 98. ± 3.58 99. ±.57 99. 7 ±.7 3. ±.9 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. Table S: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for vanillic acid (VA) with µm Fe + and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Concentration VA, µm Fe + + H O A None 6.8 ±.3 93. ±.3 A A 3A A 5A Fe + + H O B. 5 None 6.5 ±.9 7.3 ±.5 7.3 ± 3.68 9. ± 3.8 3. ±.3.8 ± 3. 93.5 ±.9 9.7 ±.5 9.7 ± 3.68 9.9 ± 3.8 87. ±.3 95. ± 3. -. ±.88.6 ±.66.7 ±.5.9 ±. 7. 8 ±. B 6B 3 5 793.3.3 ± 3..5 ±.6 55. ±. 55. ±.33 55.7 ±.59 56.9 ±.97 78.7 ± 3. 58.5 ±.6.9 ±..6 ±.33.3 ±.59 3. ±.97 3. ±. 5. ±.65 7. ± 3.37 7.5 ±.6 7.8 ±.66 7. ±.7 a All data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown.

Figure S. Gel electrophoresis images of polyphenols under Fenton reaction conditions ( µm Fe + + 5 µm H O ) in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.): a = ( )-epicatechin (EC), b = ( )-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), c = ( )-epigallocatechin (EGC), d = ( )-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), e = gallic acid (GA), f = methyl-3,,5- trihydroxybenzoate (MEGA) % Agarose gel imaged with ethidium bromide. Control lanes: Lane : kb MW ladder, Lane : plasmid DNA (p), Lane 3: p + 5 µm H O, Lane : p + 5 µm EGCG + 5 µm H O, Lane 5: p + µm Fe + + 5 µm H O. log Concentration of EGCG (µm) log Concentration of GA (µm) log Concentration of MEGA (µm) - - - 3-6 6 6 8 8 8 d e f log Concentration of EC (µm) log Concentration of ECG (µm) log Concentration of EGC (µm) - 3-3 - - 3-3 - - 3 6 8 a 6 6 8 8 b c

Figure S (continued). Gel electrophoresis images of polyphenols under Fenton reaction conditions ( µm Fe + + 5 µm H O ) in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.): g = methyl-3,-dihydroxybenzoate (MEPCA), h = myricetin (Myr), i = protocatechuic acid (PCA), j = n-propyl gallate (PrEGA), k = quercetin (Q), l = vanillic acid (VA). % Agarose gel imaged with ethidium bromide. Control lanes: Lane : kb MW ladder, Lane : plasmid DNA (p), Lane 3: p + 5 µm H O, Lane : p + 5 µm EGCG + 5 µm H O, Lane 5: p + µm Fe + + 5 µm H O. log Concentration of PrEGA (µm) log Concentration of Q (µm) log Concentration VA (µm) -3 - - 3-3 - - 3-3 6 8 j 6 8 k 6 8 l log Concentration of MEPCA (µm) log Concentration of Myr (µm) log Concentration of PCA (µm) - - 3-3 - - 3-3 6 8 g 6 8 h 6 8 i

Absorbance 3.5.5.5 mm FeSO, ph 6. mm FeSO, ph 7. 5 35 5 55 65 75 Figure S3. UV-Vis spectra of mm FeSO solutions in 9 mm MES buffer, ph 6. (grey) or 9 mm MOPS buffer, ph 7. (black). At ph 6., iron(ii) is relatively stable compared to ph 7., where iron(ii) is readily oxidized and forms iron(iii) oxide and hydroxide precipitates. IC 5 (µm) 6 8 6 Gallates Catecholates 6.5 7. 7.5 8. 8.5 9. 9.5 pk a Most Acidic Phenolic Hydrogen Figure S. Graph of IC 5 vs. pk a (first phenolic hydrogen) showing the best-fit linear correlation to the data for catecholate polyphenols (solid line, y = 8.5x - 65.3, R =.89). The data point for quercetin was omitted from the catecholate data set because of its non-catechol binding site. Error bars for IC 5 values are within the size of the data points. Correlation of polyphenol oxidation and reduction potentials to IC 5 values. Oxidation potentials for all polyphenol compounds were observed in the cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans (Figure S), but reduction potentials were observed only for catecholate compounds as previously observed for some of these compounds by Kondo, et al. (See Kondo, K.; Kurihara, M.; Fukuhara, K. Mechanism of Antioxidant Effect of Catechins Methods Enzymol., 335, 3-7). The IC 5 values showed a weak linear correlation with the reduction potentials (Ep c ) of the catecholate compounds (Figure S5, y = -3.68x + 78.3, R =.79). A similarly weak, though opposite, linear correlation with the catecholate oxidation potentials (Ep a ) was also observed (Figure S6, y = 35.3x + 58.88, R =.76). No correlation of IC 5 to Ep a was observed for gallate compounds (R =.39), although these were generally more potent antioxidants than the catecholate compounds. IC 5 (µm) 6 8 6 -. -.....3. Reduction Potential, E p c vs. Ag/AgCl (V) Figure S5. Graph of IC 5 vs. reduction potential (Ep c ) showing the best linear fit for the catecholate compounds, including vanillic acid (R =.79). Gallate compounds did not display a reduction wave in the cyclic voltammetry experiments. Values were taken from Table. IC 5 (µm) 6 8 6....6.8. Oxidation Potential, E p a vs. Ag/AgCl (V) Figure S6. Graph of IC 5 vs. oxidation potential (Ep a ) showing the best linear fit for the catecholate compounds, including vanillic acid (R =.76). Values were taken from Table.

IC 5 (µm) 6 8 6 -.5..5..5..5 Octanol/Water Partition Coefficient (C logp ) Figure S7. IC 5 vs. ClogP for phenolic compounds. Octanol/water partition coefficient (ClogP) is a measure of lipophilicity of a compound. ClogP > implies greater solubility in -octanol than in water. IC 5 was defined as the concentration of phenolic compound (in µm) required to inhibit 5% of DNA damage observed in gel electrophoresis experiments. Values are taken from Table. No dependence upon lipophilicity was observed for IC 5 values obtained in this research. ClogP values were calculated using ChemDraw Ultra 8.. 7 6 5 IC 5 (µm) 3 3 5 k obs (min - ) Figure S8. A graph of IC 5 vs. initial rate of iron oxidation upon binding of polyphenols. For these experiments, a 3: polyphenol to iron(ii) molar ratio was used. Initial rates were obtained by fitting the linear portion of the absorbance versus time kinetics data. The slope of the best-fit line is reported as the rate of iron oxidation (k obs ) for each polyphenol compound. The solid line in the graph represents the best-fit exponential function (y = 6.856x -.8575, R =.79) and shows a weak correlation between IC 5 and iron oxidation rate. Values of IC 5 are taken from Table.

Tabulation of DNA band intensities from iron(ii)edta electrophoresis experiments with EGCG. The lane numbering for Table S3 follows similarly to those for free Fe + experiments. Table S3: Tabulation of gel electrophoresis results for ( )-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) with µm iron(ii)edta and 5 µm H O in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.). a Conc. EGCG (µm) p None 89.7 ±.9.3 ±.9 N/A p p3 None 5 9.9 ±.3 9.9 ±.73 8. ±.3 9. ±.73 N/A N/A Iron(II)EDTA + H O A None 37.6 ±.83 6. ±.83 A A 3A. 37. ±.98.6 ±.9.6 ±.96 6.9 ±.98 59. ±.9 57. ±.96 -.93 ±.9.7 ±.9.83 ±.56 A.6 ±.6 58. ±.6.6 ±.3 5A 5 36.7 ±. 63.3 ±. -.8 ±.6 Iron(II)EDTA + H O B None 38. ±.9 6.6 ±.9 37.7 ±.95 6.3 ±.95. ±.69 B 3. ±.8 65.8 ±.8 -.67 ±. 3 35.7 ±.7 6.3 ±.7. ±.7 37.8 ±.78 6. ±.78 5 3.7 ±.6 65.3 ±.6 a Data are reported as the average of three trials; calculated standard deviations are shown. -. ±. -. ±. MW p p p3 A A A 3A A 5A B [EGCG] Figure S9. Gel electrophoresis image of ( )- epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG), under µm iron(ii)edta + 5 µm H O reaction conditions in mm MES buffer (ph = 6.): % agarose gel imaged with ethidium bromide. Control lanes: MW = kb MW ladder, p = plasmid DNA (p), p = p + 5 µm H O, p3 = p + 5 µm EGCG + 5 µm H O, A = p + µm iron(ii)edta + 5 µm H O. Lanes A 5A, : Increasing concentration of EGCG:.,,,, 5,,, 3,, and 5 µm, respectively. Lanes A 5A, correspond to tabulation of data for EGCG/iron(II)EDTA (Table S).

Figure S. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans for polyphenols in phosphate buffer (6 mm final concentration, ph = 6.) containing KNO 3 (6 mm final concentration) as supporting electrolyte. Polyphenol solutions (375 µm final concentration) were cycled between -35 mv and 65 mv vs. Ag/AgCl/3M KCl using a glassy carbon working electrode and platinum wire counter electrode. The scan rate was mv/s. All solutions were prepared with deoxygenated ddh O. a = ( )-epicatechin (EC), b = ( )-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), c = ( )-epigallocatechin (EGC), d = ( )-epigallocatechin3-gallate (EGCG), e = gallic acid (GA), f = methyl-3,,5-trihydroxy benzoate (MEGA). -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5 d -.E-5 e -8.E-6 f -8.E-6-8.E-6-6.E-6-6.E-6 Ep a =.93-6.E-6 -.E-6 -.E-6 Ep a =.33 Ep a =.93 -.E-6 -.E-6 -.E-6 -.E-6.E+.E+.E+.E-6.E-6.E-6 -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.6E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5 a -8.E-6 b -.E-5 c -8.E-6 -.E-5-6.E-6-6.E-6 -.E-6 Ep a =.356 -.E-6 -.E-6.E+ Ep a =.36 -.E-5-8.E-6-6.E-6 -.E-6 Ep a =.55 -.E-6.E-6 -.E-6.E+.E-6 Ep c =.6 Ep c =..E+ 6.E-6.E-6.E-6

Figure S (continued). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) scans for polyphenols in phosphate buffer (6 mm final concentration, ph = 6.) containing KNO 3 (6 mm final concentration) as supporting electrolyte. Polyphenol solutions (375 µm final concentration) were cycled between -35 mv and 65 mv vs. Ag/AgCl/3M KCl using a glassy carbon working electrode and platinum wire counter electrode. The scan rate was mv/s. All solutions were prepared with deoxygenated ddh O. g = methyl-3,-dihydroxybenzoate (MEPCA), h = myricetin (Myr), i = protocatechuic acid (PCA), j = n-propyl gallate (PrEGA), k = quercetin (Q), l = vanillic acid (VA). -.6E-5.8.6.. -. -. -6.E-6.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5..9.7.5.3. -. -.3 -.5 -.E-5 j -5.E-6 k -.E-5 -.E-6 Ep a =.5 -.E-5 l -8.E-6 -.E-5-8.E-6 Ep a =.88-3.E-6 -.E-6-6.E-6 -.E-6 -.E-6 Ep a =.5-6.E-6 -.E-6 -.E-6.E+ Ep a =.77 -.E-6.E-6 Ep c =.87.E+.E+.E-6.E-6.E-6 3.E-6 Ep c = -.93 Ep c = -.3.E-6 -.5E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. -.E-5.8.6.. -. -. g -.E-5 h -8.E-6 i -.E-5-8.E-6-6.E-6-5.E-6 Ep a =.38-6.E-6 -.E-6.E+ -.E-6 Ep c =.9 -.E-6 Ep a =.69 Ep a =.538 -.E-6.E+.E+.E-6 Ep c =.8 5.E-6.E-6.E-6.E-5.E-6 6.E-6

Absorbance.9.8.7.6.5. 3 6 7 7 5 6 5 a EC EC + 8 EGCG d EGCG + 8.9.8.7.6.5..3...9.8.7.6.5..3.. 3 3 6 5 6 7 7 5 b ECG ECG + 8 e GA GA + 8 Absorbance Absorbance.3...9.8.7.6.5..3.. 3 Absorbance Absorbance.9.8.7.6.5..3...9.8.7.6.5..3.. 3 3 6 7 7 5 6 5 c EGC EGC + 8 f MEGA MEGA + 8 Figure S. UV-vis spectra for 9 µm phenolic compounds + 5 µm Fe+: a = ( )-epicatechin (EC), b = ( )-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG), c = ( )-epigallocatechin (EGC), d = ( )epigallocatechin3-gallate (EGCG), e = gallic acid (GA), f = methyl-3,,5-trihydroxy benzoate (MEGA). All solutions were prepared in 5 mm MES buffer (ph = 6.); the blank MES spectrum was subtracted from each sample spectrum. Absorbance

Absorbance.9.8.7.6.5. 3 6 7 7 5 6 5 g MEPCA MEPCA + 8 j PCA PCA + 8.8.6...8.6...8.6...8.6.. 3 3 6 7 7 5 6 5 h Myr Myr + 8 k Q Q + 8 Absorbance Absorbance.3...9.8.7.6.5..3.. 3 Absorbance Absorbance.9.8.7.6.5..3...8.6...8.6.. 3 5 35 6 65 7 55 5 5 i 85 l VA VA + 8 PrEGA PrEGA + 75 Figure S (continued). UV-vis spectra for 9 µm phenolic compounds + 5 µm Fe+: g = methyl-3,-dihydroxybenzoate (MEPCA), h = myricetin (Myr), i = n-propyl gallate (PrEGA), j = protocatechuic acid (PCA), k = quercetin (Q), l = vanillic acid (VA). All solutions were prepared in 5 mm MES buffer (ph = 6.); the blank MES spectrum was subtracted from each sample spectrum. Absorbance

2024 © healthdocbox.com Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback