Localization of the Restrictive Event of EMC Virus Replication in Semi-permissive Monkey and Monkey-Mouse Hybrid Cells

J. gen. Virol. (I977), 37, 115-125 Printed in Great Britain II 5 Localization of the Restrictive Event of EMC Virus Replication in Semi-permissive Monkey and Monkey-Mouse Hybrid Cells By MARIE-FRANCOISE DUBOIS Institut National de la Santg et de la Recherche Mddicale, U.43, Hrpital Saint-Vincent de Paul, 74 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, Paris 75o14, France (Accepted 2 May I977) SUMMARY Encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus replication was investigated in permissive mouse MKS cells, semi-permissive monkey CVI ceils, and in somatic monkeymouse MKCVm hybrid cells whose permissiveness is under the negative control of the simian genome. We found that in CV~ cells the synthesis of both single- and double-stranded virus RNAs was restricted. In contrast, in semi-permissive hybrid C14/~ cells only the single-stranded virus RNA was synthesized in small amounts, whereas the double-stranded virus RNA accumulated late after infection. The synthesis of virus polyribosomes and virus polypeptides was lowered in semipermissive conditions. In the presence of quaternary ammonium ions, the synthesis of EMC virus was partially relieved in CV1 cells. Thus, it can be postulated that a defective function in the replication complex is involved in the restrictive event. INTRODUCTION The yield of encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus and mengovirus from different cell lines varies over a wide range depending on the host system (Tobey & Campbell, I965; Buck et al. I967; Wall & Taylor, I969). In a previous report (Dubois & Chany, I976) we have shown that EMC virus replicates to high titre in murine MKS cells, but that its multiplication is restricted in simian CV1 cells where virus yields are only about 6 ~ of those of the permissive hosts. In the case of somatic monkey-mouse hybrid cells (MKCVm), the permissiveness of each clone varies according to its simian chromosomal content. Thus, EMC replication could be under a negative control of the simian genome. We have found that in CV1 monkey cells, single-stranded and double-stranded virus RNAs are synthesized in small amounts, whereas in the semi-permissive hybrid cells, only the synthesis of the single-stranded virus RNA is restricted. In this paper we study the mechanism of this restriction in EMC virus replication and analyse the kinetics of the synthesis of single- or double-stranded virus RNA, and of virus polyribosomes or polypeptides, in infected cells. METHODS Virus. EMC virus was propagated in L cells and the stock used contained 5 IO9 p.f.u./ml. Cells. Mouse L cells are routinely maintained in the laboratory. CVa is a continuous cell line originating from African green monkey, Cercopithecus aethiops (Jensen, Girardi &

II6 M.-F. DUBOIS Gilden, I964). MKS-BU~o 0 cells originate from mouse kidney cells transformed by SV4o and resistant to 5-bromodeoxyuridine, thus lacking thymidine kinase activity (Dubbs et al. I967). The monkey-mouse hybrid cell line MLCVm was selected by Kit et al. (I97o) and cultivated in the presence of the selective HATG medium (Io -4 u-hypoxanthine, Io -5 M- aminopterin, 4 IO-SM-thymidine, Io -5 M-glycine) described by Littlefield (r965). From this hybrid population, a great variety of cell clones was isolated in soft agar in the presence of HATG, according to a previously described technique (Montagnier & MacPherson, I964). Two hybrid clones were selected for our experiments, permissive MKCVm CI~/~ and semi-permissive MKCVm C14/3. All cell cultures were maintained in Eagle's medium (MEM) supplemented with Io ~ calf serum. Extraction of virus RNA. Cell monolayers (about 5 IO7 cells) were infected with EMC virus (20 p.f.u./cell) at 37 C. One hour later, virus was removed and 3o ml of MEM added. Two hours p.i., actinomycin D was added to the culture medium in one bottle of each cell type (2 #g/ml for MKS and hybrid ceils, Io #g/ml for CV1 cells). One hour later, 3H-uridine (5 #Ci/ml) was added for I h and RNA extracted. Every hour up to 9 h p.i., a series of cell cultures previously treated with actinomycin D for I h was labelled with '~H-uridine for I h and RNA extracted following the method of Bratt & Robinson (I967). Monolayers were rinsed three times with NTE ph 8"4 buffer (NaC1 o.i M, tris 0"01 M, ph 8" 4, EDTA o'ooi M) and dissociated with the same buffer containing I ~ SDS and I o/fl-mercaptoethanol. RNA was extracted twice at 4 C with twice distilled phenol (Merck) saturated with NTE ph 8. 4 buffer containing o'5 ~ fl-mercaptoethanol. The third extraction was performed with NTE ph 7"4 saturated phenol. The last aqueous phase was precipitated with ethanol at - 2o C for I2 h or more. The RNA precipitate was dissolved in I to 2 ml NTE ph 7"4 and layered on a 5 to 30 ~ sucrose gradient prepared in the same buffer. After centrifugation for 18 h at 2o0oo rev/min in a Beckman L 3 ultracentrifuge (SW 25. I rotor), I ml fractions were collected with an ISCO fraction collector and 0"5 ml of each was treated with pancreatic RNase (2o/zg/ml) for I h at room temperature. After addition of bovine albumin (5o0 #g), RNA was precipitated with Io ~ TCA at 4 C. The precipitates were filtered through a Whatman GF/C filter and thoroughly rinsed with 5 ~ TCA and ethanol. After drying, the filters were counted with toluene PPO-POPOP liquid in a Packard scintillation counter. Analysis of viruspolyribosomes. Cell monolayers (io 7 cells) were infected with EMC virus (IO p.f.u./cell) for I h at 37 C. The virus was then removed and MEM added. Four h p.i., actinomycin D was added (2 #g/ml for MKS and hybrid cells, Io #g/ml for CV1 cells) and I h later 5 #Ci]ml of ah-uridine was added for I h. Virus polyribosomes were extracted as described by Morse, Herrmann & Heywood (i97i). Cells were rinsed with io ml TKM buffer (tris o.oi M, ph 7"4, KCI o'25 M, MgC12 o'oi M) at 4 C, scraped and suspended in TKM buffer (IO ml) then centrifuged at I2OO rev/min in a Martin-Christ centrifuge for Io min at 4 C. The cell pellet was suspended in o.2 ml of TKM buffer containing 0"5 Triton X-Ioo. The cell suspension was then drawn in and oat of a Pasteur pipette 2o times and centrifuged at 5ooo rev/min for Io min at 4 C. The supernatant was layered on a sucrose gradient (i 5 to 4o ~) in TKM buffer and centrifuged in a Spinco SW 4I rotor at 4o50o rev]min for 7o min at 4 C. Fractions were collected by puncturing the bottom of the tube and the acid-insoluble radioactivity was measured as previously described. Infection of monolayers and preparation of cell lystates of labelled EMC virus-specific proteins. Confluent monolayers (approx. 5 IO6 cells) were infected with EMC virus at a m.o.i, of IOO. After incubation for i h at 37 C to allow the attachment of the virus, the virus suspension was removed and replaced by 4 ml of amino acid-deficient Eagle's medium

Restriction of EMC virus replication I 17 Table 1. Time course of single-stranded 32S (ssrna) and double-stranded 18S (dsrna) virus RNA synthesis in permissive and semi-permissive cells Hours MKS CV~ C14/~ after r ~ ~ c ~ ~ r ~ infection ssrna dsrna ssrna dsrna ssrna dsrna 3-4 175" 27 18 I2 157 IO 4-'5 281 19 80 13 69 19 5--6 586 36 356 IO 521 51 6--7 I'976 89 486 I9 355 75 7-8 1"446 52 492 27 3oi IiO 8-9 1.o18 59 8o 14 IO6 51 9-1o 365 26 I8 IO 19 9 3-10 5"847 308 1"530 105 1"528 325 * Ct/min/lo ~ cells. (pre-warmed at 37 C) containing I ~oo agamma-globulin calf serum and actinomycin D (5/zg/ml for MKS and hybrid cells, Io #g/ml for CV1 cells). At different times after infection, cells were pulse-labelled for 70 min by adding l~c-protein hydrolysate (to #Ci/ml). Cells were scraped from the glass, washed twice with cold PBS and the pelleted cells covered with o.2 ml of lysis mixture, o.or M-sodium phosphate buffer, ph 7"2, containing 2 }/o SDS and 5 ~ fl-mercaptoethanol. Lysates were stored at -20 C until analysed. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Gels were prepared according to the procedure described by Maizel (1970. The gel columns (o. 7 x 22 cm) contained o.i M-sodium phosphate buffer (ph 7"2), o-i ~ SDS, 7"5 ~ acrylamide, o-z ~ (v]v) methylene bisacrylamide. Polymerization was catalysed by ammonium persulphate (0"5 mg/ml) and o'o5 ~ N,N,N',N'- tetramethylethylene-diamine. Samples (50 to loo#1) were prepared by adding lo glycerol and o-ooz ~ bromophenol blue and were immersed in boiling water for 4 rain immediately before layering on to the gels. Electrophoresis was carried out at 4 ma/gel for I h and 8 ma/gel until the bromophenol blue had migrated to within 2 cm of the end of the gel (zo to 22 tl). Gels were fractionated into I mm slices and transferred to a scintillation vial with o.z ml of ammonia for one night. Two ml scintillation fluid (Instagel, Packard Instrument) was then added and radioactivity measured in a liquid scintillation spectrometer (Packard 3320). The tool. wt. of the virus-specific polypeptides were determined by comparison with marker proteins, bovine serum albumin (mol. wt. = 66500), pepsin (I3 4o0), chymotrypsinogen (22 50o) and cytochrome c (13400). The reference gels were stained with Coomassie brilliant blue (o-2 ~ in 50 ~ methanol, 50 ~ water, containing 7 ~ acetic acid). Reagents. Actinomycin D was a gift from Merck, Sharp and Dohme (New Jersey, U.S.A.). 3H-uridine (sp. act. 20 Ci/mmol) and 14C-protein hydrolysate (sp. act. 0"5 mci/mg) were purchased from the Biology Department of the Centre de l'energie Atomique (Saclay, France). RESULTS Kinetic analysis of virus RNA synthesis In a previous report Dubois & Chany (I976) showed that virus RNA synthesis was restricted in semi-permissive cells and both single-stranded and double-stranded virus RNAs were synthesized in small amounts in CV1 cells. In contrast, only the synthesis of singlestranded virus RNA was restricted in the semi-permissive C14/a hybrid cells. To explore this phenomenon further, EMC virus-infected cells were pulse labelled for I h with 3H-uridine

118 M.-F. DUBOIS I I I I I i 4 3 t,j 5 10 15 20 25 Fraction number Fig. I. Sedimentation analysis of polysomes from EMC-infected cells. In the presence of actinomycin D, cells were pulse-labelled with 3H-uridine for I h at 5 h p.i. Polysomes were extracted as described in Methods. Cell lysates were loaded on to I I ml linear gradients of I5 to 40 ~ sucrose in TKM buffer and centrifuged at 405oo rev/min for 7o rain at 4 C. Fractions were analysed for acidinsoluble radioactivity. 0--0, MKS ceils; V--V C12/M; ~'--V, C1~/3; I1--11 CV1. from 4 to Ioh p.i. The 3H-uridine incorporation into single-stranded 32S and doublestranded 18S RNAs was measured at different times after infection of permissive MKS cells and semi-permissive CV1 and MKCVm C14,'.~ cells. The results are illustrated in Table I, In the case of parental MKS cells, the synthesis of single-stranded (32S) and double-stranded (I8S) virus RNAs increases up to 7 h p.i. and rapidly declines thereafter. In the semipermissive CV1 cells, the rate of synthesis of both virus RNAs is maximal at 8 h p.i. and low compared to MKS cells. In the semi-permissive hybrid Cl4/a, the synthesis of single-stranded 32S virus RNA is detected at 3 h p.i. (as in MKS cells) but is already decreasing at 5 h p.i. In contrast, the synthesis of double-stranded virus RNA (RNase-resistant) increases until 8 h p.i. and declines thereafter. Moreover, the amount of double-stranded virus RNA synthesized from 4 to IO h p.i. by this hybrid C14/3 is as high as that synthesized in MKS cells. The difference between the semi-permissive parental CV1 and hybrid Cl4ta cells is interest-

Restriction of EMC virus replication I 19 (a) I I I F 10 A E Y G 3 5 W I I I 10 5 I I I lo 15 Distance migrated (cm) Fig. 2. Electrophoretic profile of proteins synthesized in ClaIM cells after infection with EMC virus. Cells were pulse-labelled with 14C-protein hydrolysate for 70 min at 5 h p.i. Whole cell extracts and analysis by gel electrophoresis were performed as described in Methods. (a) C12/~ cells infected with EMC virus; (b) CI~/M uninfected control cells. ing. In the first case, both single- and double-stranded virus RNAs are synthesized in small amounts, whereas in the hybrid C14/3 cells only the synthesis of the single-stranded virus RNA is restricted. Virus-specific polysomes EMC virus-specific polysomes were examined in permissive MKS and hybrid C12/~ and in semi-permissive CV1 and hybrid MKS and hybrid C14/3 cells. After labelling with 3Huridine between 5 and 6 h p.i., polysomes were extracted and analysed in a sucrose gradient as described in Methods. Cells were treated with actinomycin D before:labelling so that

I20 M.-F. DUBOIS the host polysomes were not labelled. Virus-induced polysomes (fractions 7 to 12) appear with a sedimentation coefficient of 35oS to 4ooS in both restrictive and permissive cells (Fig. I). The s~0 value was calculated according to the McEwen tables 0967). These 35oS to 4ooS peaks are in fact virus polysomes, since cellular polysomes have a smaller sedimentation constant and virions sediment at I5oS (Roizman, Mayer & Rapp, I958). Moreover, they disappear after treatment with ribonuclease. In permissive CI~/~ cells, where the virus yield is 3 times greater than in MKS cells, the radioactivity incorporated into virus RNA linked to the ribosomes is also three times greater. On the contrary, in semi-permissive C14/3, where both the synthesis of virions and virus RNA is three to four times less than in MKS cells, the synthesis of polysomes is also three times less. In the case of semi-permissive CV1 cells, the peak of polysomes is not detectable corresponding to the low synthesis of single-stranded RNA. Thus it seems that the restrictive multiplication of EMC virus in semi-permissive cells is not related to a fault in the linkage of virus RNA to host ribosomes. The increase in the number of ribosomes corresponds to the amount of virus RNA synthesized. Synthesis of virus-specific polypeptides The synthesis of virus-specific polypeptides in EMC virus-infected cells (MKS, CVa, C12/~, C14/3) was investigated using the method of SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (based on the conditions outlined in Methods). In these experiments, cells were pulselabelled with a 14C-protein hydrolysate for 7o min, the time which corresponds to the mid-logarithmic phase of virus production. The electropherogram of Cl~/~-infected cells (the most permissive hybrid for EMC virus) is presented in Fig. 2 (a). The profile is comparable to that obtained by Paucha, Seehafer & Colter (I974) in L cells infected with mengovirus. The nomenclature used is that employed by Butterworth et al. (I97 0 in their studies with EMC virus. It appears that in permissive C12m, where EMC virus RNA and virions are actively synthesized, all the virus precursors and capsid polypeptides are synthesized normally after pulse-labelling for 7o rain at 5 h p.i. To make sure that these polypeptides were not of cell origin, the characteristic electrophoretic pattern obtained with lysates of mock-infected C2!~ is shown in Fig. 2 (b). Cellular protein synthesis is decreased markedly by infection with EMC virus. The residual host proteins synthesized do not have their equivalent in the infected cells. In the case of permissive MKS cells (Fig. 3a), the precursor polypeptides A and C and their cleavage products B, H, C, D and I are present in small quantities after labelling of the infected cells for 7o rain at 5 h p.i. In contrast, capsid polypeptides and non-structural polypeptides E, F and G are synthesized in large amounts. In a further experiment, C14/3 cells were labelled at 6 h p.i. and CV1 cells at 8 h p.i. for 7o rain. Precursor polypeptides were labelled in the hybrid clone (Fig. 3 b) to a very small extent, whereas in CV1 cells (Fig. 3 e) they were not detected. In the two types of cells, capsid polypeptides were labelled but in smaller amounts than in permissive cells. Virus replication in the presence of hexamethonium bromide It has been found (Prather & Taylor, I975) that quaternary ammonium ions partially relieve the restricted replication of mengovirus in Madin-Darby bovine kidney (MDBK) cells. These compounds are known to reverse the inhibition of poliovirus replication by guanidine (Caliguiri & Tamm, I973). Moreover, a resemblance between EMC virus restriction and the guanidine effect on poliovirus replication could be established. Thus, the

Restriction of EMC virus replication I2I I I I 10 (a) F a E e ~ 7 G A D!!! 7 (b)._= 5 ef e G A D E I 5 (c) ' 5 10 15 Distance migrated (cm) Fig. 3. Electrophoretic profile of proteins synthesized in (a) MKS cells; (b) C14/3 hybrid cells; (c) CV1 cells after infection with EMC virus. Cells were pulse-labelled with 14C-protein hydrolysate for 7o rain at 5 h p.i. in MKS cells, 6 h p.i. in C14/3 cells, and 8 h p.i. in CVx cells. Whole cell extracts and analysis by gel electrophoresis were performed as described in Methods.

I22 M.-F. DUBOIS I i i l i!! i iii1 i 6 ~5.E 4 3 N 1 I l a i i iiil i i i i i li!l I 1 l0 100 Concentration (mm) Fig. 4. Dose-response curve for hexamethonium in EMC-infected cells: @--@ MKS; I1--11, CV1; Y--V, C14ls hybrid cells. Cells were infected with Io p.f.u, of EMC virus/cell and incubated in the presence of hexamethonium bromide at I h p.i. for I6 h. Virus was then assayed on L cells for virus yield. The results are expressed as ~,irus yield relative to the yield of untreated EMC virus-infected cells. Table 2. Effect of quaternary ammonium ions on EMC virus multiplication in CV1 cells Virus yield (p.f.u./ml) at concentrations: Relative increase in In presence of: o mm 80 mm virus yield Hexamethonium bromide 7"8 x io 7 2"7 x lo 8 3"4 7"5 IOT 2. 3 x io 8 3.0 8"4 x Io 7 4'5 x Io 8 5"4 5"9 x lo T 2.8 X 10 8 4"9 8"I x 10 T 2-3 I0 8 2"8 8"I X IO T 2"3 x IO 8 2"8 3'6x I0 ~ 9'1 X IO 7 2' 5 1"8 IO T 7'2 l0 T 4"0 Choline chloride 6 x Io ~ 4"6 x Io 7 7"7 I X 10 7 6'3 x Io T 6"3 3 x Io T 7"7 IoT 2"6 2"3 IOT I'I X I0 8 4"9 2'4 x I0 T 5 IOT 2.O I X IO T 8"2 X IO T 8"2 effect of one of these ions, hexamethonium, on EMC virus replication in permissive and semi-permissive cells was studied. One h p.i. (at an m.o.i, of Io) MKS, CV1 and C14/3 cells were treated with hexamethonium bromide at various concentrations (I to I2o ram) and incubated at 37 C for I6 h. The virus yield was then determined by the plaque-forming method in L cells. The dose-response curve for hexamethonium is shown in Fig. 4- In permissive MKS cells, the increase in virus

Restriction of EMC virus replication 12 3 yield is very low, irrespective of the concentration of hexamethonium. In contrast, in the presence of an 8o mm solution of hexamethonium, the virus yield is increased up to 6 times in semi-permissive CV1 cells and two fold in C14/a. Another quaternary ammonium ion, choline chloride, has a similar effect on virus replication in the parental and hybrid cells. The results of several experiments performed in the presence of optimal concentrations (8o ram) of hexamethonium bromide and choline chloride are summarized in Table 2. The relative increase in virus yields ranges from 2. 5 to 5"3 in the presence of hexamethonium and from 2 to 8.2 in the presence of choline. DISCUSSION We reported previously that the restricted replication of EMC virus in monkey CV1 cells was not due to an absence of binding sites for virus attachment or to a decreased uncoating of the virus (Dubois & Chany, 1976). In fact it is not possible to increase the virus yield by infecting cells with virus nucleic acid. In somatic monkey-mouse hybrid cells, the decreased virus yield is probably not due to a lack of cellular factors which depend on the murine genome. Therefore, the simian genome seems to be partly responsible for the restrictive event. In order to localize this event, we have investigated the different stages of virus replication in parental mouse MKS, simian CV1 and somatic hybrid MKCVm cells. We have shown that single-stranded virus RNA synthesis is maximal between 6 and 7 h p.i. in MKS ceils, 7 to 8 h p.i. in CV~ cells and 5 to 6 h p.i. in C14/a cells. From the data reported in Table I, the radioactivity incorporated in double-stranded virus RNA (RF) can be calculated. It represents 5 ~ of that incorporated in single-stranded virus RNA in MKS cells, 6 ~o in CV1 cells, but rises to 2I ~oo in C1~/3 cells. It can be concluded that, in these hybrids, an accumulation of RF occurs, whereas the synthesis of singlestranded RNA is reduced. The same phenomenon has been observed in MDBK cells infected with mengovirus when virus RNA synthesis was arrested 4 h p.i., whereas RF synthesis continued at a rate comparable to that observed in permissive mouse L cells (Wall & Taylor, I969, I976). Since our pulse-labelling intervals with 3H-uridine were i h, we could not detect the replicative intermediary (RI) form which is labelled by brief pulse-labelling. Thus, the double-stranded RNase-resistant RNA detected in our experiments is the RF form sedimenting at I8S which is considered to be an end-product of the replication. It is known that RNA synthesis in cells infected by picornaviruses is associated with two membrane complexes (Arlinghaus, Syrewicz & Loesch, 1972; Caliguiri, I974). A large replication complex (sedimenting in a Ioo to 3ooS region)contains predominantly singlestranded 35S RNA, while a small replication complex (sedimenting at 7oS) contains doublestranded RNA. We postulate that in our system the heavy replication complex would have a disturbed functioning in the semi-permissive simian and hybrid cells, causing a low synthesis of 35S virus RNA. On the contrary, the light replication complex, synthesizing double-stranded RNA, would be non-functional in simian cells but active late after infection in semi-permissive hybrid cells. Whatever the mechanism of blocking RNA virus synthesis may be in the semi-permissive cells, it can be assumed that the inhibitory step of virus multiplication is located at this stage. Indeed, the virus polyribosomes in murine, simian and hybrid cells have the same sedimentation constant (35o to 4ooS); thus, the same number of ribosomes is linked to a messenger RNA of the same size. The only difference between virus polysomes in the cells is of a quantitative order. With increasing cell permissiveness, more polyribosomes are synthesized.

I2 4 M.-F. DUBOIS From our analysis of polypeptides synthesized in the infected cells at the mid-logarithmic phase of virus production, the semi-permissiveness of simian and hybrid cells cannot be related to a different scheme of polypeptide synthesis. The experiments performed in the presence of quaternary ammonium ions indicate that the restrictive event of EMC virus replication in semi-permissive cells is located at the level of the replication complex. It is known that the picornavirus RNA-polymerase complex, including enzyme, template and nascent RNA, is associated with a specific cellular membrane fraction (Caliguiri & Tamm, I97o; Ehrenfeld, Maizel & Summers, I97o ). We suggest that in our system the disturbed functioning of the replication in semi-permissive simian cells could be related to the RNA polymerase itself. Indeed, its polypeptide composition is not yet well defined for any picornavirus. However, it has been shown with poliovirus that the virus polypeptide X (which corresponds to F polypeptide for EMC virus) might be responsible for organizing the polymerase on the membrane. In addition, several host polypeptides might be components of the polymerase (Butterworth, Shimshick & Yin, I976 ). In our case, these host polypeptides could possibly be found in smaller amounts in simian cells. This hypothesis is however not easy to verify since the RNA polyrnerase is not functional when isolated from the smooth cytoplasmic membranes and is thus difficult to purify. I am grateful to Dr C. Chany for his valuable advice and criticism and acknowledge the excellent technical skill of Elly Efthymiou and the assistance in the manuscript preparation by Carol Girard. This study was partially supported by ATP contract number 28-76-60 of the Institut National de la Sant6 et de la Recherche M6dicale, U.-43, Paris. REFERENCES ARLINGHAUS, R. B., SYREWICZ, J. J. & LOESCH, W. T. (1972). RNA polymerase complexes from mengovirus infected cells. Archly fiir die gesamte Virusforschung 38, 17-28. BV, AXT, M. A. & ROBINSON, W. S. (I967). Ribonucleic acid synthesis in cells infected with Newcastle disease virus. Journal of Molecular Biology 23, 1-21. BUCK, C.A., 6RANOER, G.A., TAYLOR, M.W. a HOLLAND, J.J. (I967). Efficient, inefficient, and abortive infection of different mammalian ceils by small RNA viruses. Virology 33, 36-46. BUTTERWORTH, B. E., HALL, L., STOLTZFUS, C. M. & RUECKERT, R. R. (I97D. Virus-specific proteins synthesized in encephalomyocarditis virus-infected HeLa cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 68, 3083-3087. BtrrTERWORTH, B. E., SHIMS~ICK, E. J. & VIN, F. It. 0976). Association of the polioviral RNA polymerase complex with phospholipid membranes. Journal of Virology x9, 457-466. CALIGUml, L.A. (I974). Analysis of RNA associated with the poliovirus RNA replication complexes. Virology 58, 526-535. CALIGIJIRI, L. A. & TAMM, I. (t97o). Characterization of poliovirus-specific structures associated with cytoplasmic membranes. Virology 4 ~, I I I-I22. CALIGUmt, L. A. & TAMM, L (I973). Guanidine and 2-(hydroxybenzyl-benzimidazole)(HBB): selective inhibitors of picornavirus multiplication. In Selective Inhibitors of Viral Functions, pp. 257-293. Edited by W. A. Carter. Cleveland, Ohio: CRS Press. DOBBS, D. ~., KIT, S., DE TORRES, R.A. & ANKEN, M. (1967). Virogenic properties of bromodeoxyuridineresistant simian virus SV4o-transformed mouse kidney cells. Journal of Virology x, 968-979. DUBOIS, M.V. & CHA~, C. (1976). Permissiveness of mouse, monkey and hybrid cells to encephalomyocarditis (EMC) virus. Journal of General Virology 3x, I73-I8I. EHRENFELD, E., MAIZEL, J. V. & SUMMERS, D. 1 v. (I97o). Soluble RNA polymerase complex from poliovirusinfected HeLa cells. Virology 4 o, 84o-846. JENSEN, IV. C., GIRARDI, A. J. & GILDEN, R. R. (t964). Infection of human and simian tissue cultures with Rous sarcoma virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 52, 53-59. KIT, S., NAKAJIMA, K., KURIMU'RA.~ T., DUBBS, D. R. & CASSINGENA, R. (t97o). Monkey-mouse hybrid cell lines containing the SV40 genome in a partially repressed state. International Journal of Cancer 5, I-~4.

Restriction of EMC virus replication 125 LITTLEFIELD, J. W. (I 965). Studiesonthymidinekinaseinculturedmousefibroblasts.BiochimicaetBiophysica Acta 95, I4-22. MAIZEL, J. V., JUN. (I97t). Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of viral proteins. In Methods in Virology, vol. v, p. 18o. Edited by K. Maramarosch & H. Koprowski. New York and London: Academic Press. McEWEN, C. R. (t967). Tables for estimating sedimentation through linear concentration gradients of sucrose solution. Analytic Biochemistry 2o, II4-I49. MONTAGNtER, L. & MACPHERSON, L (I964). Croissance s61ective en g61ose de ceuules de hamster transform6es par le virus polyome. Comptes Rendus Hebdomadaires des Sdances de l'acaddmie des Sciences Paris 258, 4t71-4173. MORSE, R. K., HERRMANN, H. & HEYWOOD, S. M. (t970. Extraction with Triton X-too of active polysomes from monolayer cultures of embryonic muscle cells. Biochemica et Biophysica Acta 232, 4o3-409. PAUCHA, E., SEEHAFER, J. & COLTER, J. S. (1974). Synthesis of viral-specific polypeptides in mengovirus infected L cells: evidence of asymmetric translation of the viral genome. Virology 6x, 3t5-325. PRATHER, S. O. & TAYLOR, M. W. 0975)- Host-dependent restriction of mengovirus replication, w. Effect of some quaternary ammonium ions on the restricted replication of mengovirus in Madin-Darby bovine kidney cells. Journal of Virology x5, Io33-to36. ROIZMAN, B., MAYER, M. M. & RAPP, H. J. (t958). Immunochemical studies of poliovirus. III. Further studies on the immunologic and physical properties of poliovirus particles produced in tissue culture. Journal of Immunology 8x, 419-425. TOBEY, R. A. & CAMPBELL, E. W. (1965). Mengovirus replication. III. Virus reproduction in chinese hamster ovary cells. Virology 27, I 1-16. WALL, R. & TAYLOR, M. W. (I969). Host-dependent restriction of mengovirus replication. Journal of Virology 4, 681-687. WALL, R. & TAYLOR, M. W. (1976). Mengovirus RNA synthesis in productive and restrictive cell lines. Virology 42, 78-86. (Received 4 January 1977)