Reducing Alcohol Use Among 9th Grade Students: 6 Month Outcomes of a Brief, Web-Based Intervention

Similar documents
Web-Based Personalized Feedback: Is This an Appropriate Approach for Reducing Drinking Among High School Students?

Programme Name: Climate Schools: Alcohol and drug education courses

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP) FOCUSED QUESTION

Preventing High-Risk Drinking in Youth in the Workplace: A Web-Based Normative Feedback Program

An experimental test of an alcohol expectancy challenge in mixed gender groups of young heavy drinkers

Centre for Analysis of Youth Transitions. There are 2 group sessions spread across 2 weeks, with each session lasting 90 minutes.

Outcome Report - Alcohol Wise

At the Israel Electric Company: Israel Railways

Recent Trends and Findings Regarding the Magnitude and Prevention of College Drinking and Drug Use Problems

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention

CONSIDERABLE RESEARCH HAS EVALUATED

Advanced LifeSkills Training

DRINKING A REPORT ON DRINKING IN THE SECOND DECADE OF LIFE IN EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA

Running head: GROUP IDENTITY, PERCEIVED NORMS, AND ALCOHOL

Brief Intervention (BI) for Adolescents

Author: Marvin D. Krank, Ph.D. Author s Affiliation: UBC Okangan. Second Author: Aarin P. Frigon Second Author s Affiliation: UBC Okanagan

Perceived Behavioral Alcohol Norms Predict Drinking for College Students While Studying Abroad*

Estimates of the Reliability and Criterion Validity of the Adolescent SASSI-A2

Binge Drinking. December Binge Drinking. Updated: December P age

Community-based interventions to reduce substance misuse among vulnerable and disadvantaged young people: Evidence and implications for public health

AlcoholEdu for College

Whitney Israel, Ashley Brooks-Russell, Ming Ma Community Epidemiology & Program Evaluation Group, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus

A REPORT ON THE INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE OF YOUTH TOBACCO USE IN DELAWARE

STRESS LEVELS AND ALCOHOL USE AMONG UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS: A QUANTITATIVE STUDY. Noemi Alsup California State University, Long Beach May 20, 2014

Evaluating the Efficacy of AlcoholEdu for College

Running head: RANK-FRAMING IN SOCIAL NORMS INTERVENTIONS 1

New Research Directions in Young Adult Marijuana Use, Consequences, and Prevention

Survey of Smoking, Drinking and Drug Use (SDD) among young people in England, Andrew Bryant

SELF-REPORTED ALCOHOL USE AND SEXUAL BEHAVIORS OF ADOLESCENTS'

KEY FINDINGS FROM THE 2005 MYRBS

Teens and Prescription Drugs:

BRIEF REPORT PREVENTING ILLICIT DRUG USE IN ADOLESCENTS: LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP DATA FROM A RANDOMIZED CONTROL TRIAL OF A SCHOOL POPULATION

Youth Survey S Project y Project Sample State Bach

How do we combine two treatment arm trials with multiple arms trials in IPD metaanalysis? An Illustration with College Drinking Interventions

Substance use has declined or stabilized since the mid-1990s.

Excellence in Prevention descriptions of the prevention programs and strategies with the greatest evidence of success

Targeting Misperceptions of Descriptive Drinking Norms: Efficacy of a Computer-Delivered Personalized Normative Feedback Intervention

Connecting Suicidal College Students to Care

Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation

Marijuana 101. Cristal Connelly- Marijuana Prevention & Education Consultant Washington State Department of Health- Community Based Prevention

DRINKING RISK LEVEL AND ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION SITUATION AMONG SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN A RURAL AREA OF THAILAND

CURRICULUM VITAE Hector I. Lopez-Vergara

Freshman Alcohol Prevention Project: Correcting Misperceptions through Personalized Normative Feedback

2008 Ohio State University. Campus Climate Study. Prepared by. Student Life Research and Assessment

Preventing Underage Drinking: A Salvadoran Program Evaluation

The New Zealand Mental Health Commission has defined recovery as. The Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP): workshop evaluation CONSUMER ISSUES

Impulsivity, negative expectancies, and marijuana use: A test of the acquired preparedness model

Effects of a Brief Motivational Intervention to Reduce College Student Drinking. Kurt H. Dermen University at Buffalo State University of New York

Alcohol Use and Related Behaviors

Alcohol Abstinence or Harm-Reduction? Parental Messages for College-Bound Light Drinkers

Factors influencing alcohol use among Korean adolescents: A comparison between middle and high school students

David O Malley, Ph.D., LISW Case Western Reserve University Cleveland, Ohio

Substance use among year olds in the UK: Key findings from the 2011 European Survey Project on Alcohol and Drugs (ESPAD)

NCADD-SFV Vesper Ave Van Nuys Ca Phone: (818) Fax: (818) ;

A Reality Check. Agenda for Presentation. Myths and Facts About Underage Drinking - Approaches that Make the Greatest Impact

Review of Various Instruments Used with an Adolescent Population. Michael J. Lambert

Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation

Exploring College Student Alcohol Consumption Patterns Using Social Network Analysis

COMMUNITY-LEVEL EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL AND PEER RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS ON ADOLESCENT SUBSTANCE USE

Spring 2014 Heroin Prevention Program Pilot: Evaluation Report Executive Summary

S.O.S. Suicide Prevention Program

Implementation of primary care alcohol screening, brief interventions and referral as routine practice in PHC in South Africa

Motivational enhancement therapy for high-risk adolescent smokers

Reducing Youth Alcohol Use through Positive Community Norms in Minnesota

Department of Communication, Purdue University, Beering Hall, West Lafayette, USA

Arizona Youth Tobacco Survey 2005 Report

Regional Concerns for Underage Drinking: Risks of Race & Ethnicity

At-Risk in Primary Care INTRODUCTION ORIGINAL RESEARCH MARCH 2016

Preventing Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Drug Use through Life Skills Training

School orientation and mobility specialists School psychologists School social workers Speech language pathologists

Delaware Strategic Prevention Framework - Partnerships for Success

Traditional Prevention Strategies and the Social Norms Approach

AWARE Program and Residence Life: A Sustained Model Partnership for Alcohol Abuse Prevention at the University of Wyoming

Psychology of Addictive Behaviors Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc.

NSW Summit on Alcohol Abuse August NSW Parliament. NSW Department of Education and Training

STARTING A COMMUNITY CONVERSATION ON UNDERAGE DRINKING

Delaware SPF-SIG Community Readiness Assessment

Exploring the Utility of an Extended Theory of Planned Behavior Framework for School-Based Gambling Prevention Programs

Alcohol Edu. Criterion 4 Documents. NCA Self Study. Eric Davidson. Eastern Illinois University Year 2014

SUBSTANCE USE AND ABUSE ON CAMPUS: RESULTS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN STUDENT LIFE SURVEY (2011)

Free! Register now on Eventbrite

Centerstone Research Institute

How Well Do You Know Tompkins County Youth?

Drug Prevention: Health & Opioid Prevention Education (HOPE) Curriculum

Predictors of Cigarette Smoking Behavior Among Military University Students in Taiwan. Wang, Kwua-Yun; Yang, Chia-Chen

Substance Use During Young Adulthood

Short-term Evaluation of a Web-Based College Alcohol Misuse and Harm Prevention Course (College Alc)

Comprehensive Substance Abuse Prevention Program Evaluation

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

LEADS: For Youth (Linking Education and Awareness of Depression and Suicide)

University of Wisconsin-Madison Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS) Assessment

Motivational interviewing versus feedback only in emergency care for young adult problem drinking

Evaluation of the In-School Tobacco Use Prevention Education Program,

ALCOHOL AND OTHER DRUGS: PREVALENCE, DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS AND PERCEIVED EFFECTS

Back to Table of Contents. Violence, Crime,

Being Controlled by Normative Influences: Self-Determination as a Moderator of a Normative Feedback Alcohol Intervention

E-cigarettes surpass tobacco cigarettes among teens

How Do We Choose Our Alcohol Prevention Programs? Fun for the students, sneak in education! Sobering displays. Information booklets.

SMOKING AND DRINKING AMONG YOUNG PEOPLE IN IRELAND

Transcription:

Boise State University ScholarWorks Counselor Education Faculty Publications and Presentations Department of Counselor Education 7-1-2014 Reducing Alcohol Use Among 9th Grade Students: 6 Month Outcomes of a Brief, Web-Based Intervention Diana M. Doumas Boise State University Robin Hausheer Boise State University Susan Esp Boise State University Courtney Cuffee Boise State University NOTICE: this is the author s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, (2014). DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2014.02.006

Running Head: WEB-BASED INTERVENTION Reducing Alcohol Use Among 9 th Grade Students: 6 Month Outcomes of a Brief, Web-Based Intervention Diana M. Doumas a,b,* Robin Hausheer a Susan Esp b,c Courtney Cuffee a Author Note a Department of Counselor Education, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA. b Institute for the Study of Addiction, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA. c Department of Community and Environmental Health, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725, USA. * Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Diana Doumas, Department of Counselor Education, Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID 83725. E-mail: dianadoumas@boisestate.edu Telephone: (208) 426-2646; Fax: (208) 426-4386.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 2 Abstract This study tested a brief, web-based personalized feedback program aimed at reducing alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences among 9 th grade students (N = 513). Results indicated no differences between the control group and intervention group on either frequency of drinking or alcohol-related consequences at the 6-month follow-up. Reductions in alcohol use and the associated consequences found at the 3-month follow-up were not sustained across the academic year. Results indicate brief, web-based feedback programs may not be sufficient to provide a sustained impact on alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences over time, suggesting either booster sessions or adjunctive interventions, such as parent-based interventions, may be warranted for this age group. Key Words: high school; alcohol; web-based; personalized feedback

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 3 Reducing Alcohol Use Among 9 th Grade Students: 6 Month Outcomes of a Brief, Web-Based Intervention 1. Introduction Underage drinking represents a significant problem in the United States, with alcohol use increasing substantially during the transition from middle school to high school. According to national survey data, lifetime prevalence rates for alcohol use among 8 th and 10 th grade students are 29.5% and 54.0%, respectively (Johnston et al., 2013). Additionally, 11.6% of 8 th grade students report alcohol use in the past 30 days compared to 27.6% of students in the 10 th grade (Johnston et al., 2013). More concerning is the escalation in heavy drinking during this transition, with reports of being drunk in the past 30 days increasing from 3.6% in the 8 th grade to 14.5% in the 10 th grade (Johnston et al., 2013). The significant increase in alcohol use occurring between the 8 th and 10 th grade points to the importance of developing evidence-based prevention programming for students transitioning to high school. Research indicates that school-based programs targeting alcohol use that use motivational enhancement and cognitive-behavioral principals are effective in reducing alcohol use among high school students (Conrod, Steward, Comeau & Maclean, 2006; O Leary-Barrett, Macie, Castellanos-Ryan, Al-Khundhairy & Conrod, 2010; Sussman, Dent & Stacy, 2002). These types of programs, however, are time intensive, require extensive training, and may be difficult for schools to implement. Thus, it is important to assess the efficacy of brief interventions that require minimal training, few resources, and will be appealing to adolescents. Web-based interventions may be particularly useful within the high-school setting as web-based programs are inexpensive, require minimal training, and are easy to disseminate to large groups of students within the existing framework of the educational setting. Additionally, web-based interventions

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 4 can be infused into the school curriculum and can improve program fidelity (Schinke, Di Noia, & Glassman, 2004). A growing number of controlled studies indicate that web-based programs delivered to adolescents (Newton, Andrews, Teeson, & Vogl, 2009; Schwinn, Schinke, & Di Nola, 2010) or adolescents and their parents (Koning et al., 2009; Schinke, Cole, & Fang, 2009; Schinke, Fang, & Cole, 2009) are effective in reducing alcohol use among adolescents. The web-based interventions used in these studies, however, included 4 12 modules or sessions, with each session taking up to 40 minutes. Because schools with limited resources may not be able to adopt such programs, research is needed to examine the efficacy of brief, school-based interventions that require fewer resources to implement and less time for administration. More recently, Doumas, Esp, Turrisi, Hausheer, & Cuffee (2014) tested the efficacy of a brief, web-based intervention program, the echeckup TO GO, in reducing alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences among 9 th grade students. Results indicated a reduction in frequency of alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences in the intervention group relative to the control group at a 3-month follow up. These results provide evidence for brief, web-based personalized feedback as a promising approach to reduce underage drinking and the associated consequences for this age group. The purpose of this study is to extend the literature by examining whether or not the reductions in alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences found at 3-months (Doumas et al., 2014) would be sustained across the academic year. 2. Method 2.1. Participants For a detailed description of participant recruitment and procedures, see Doumas and colleagues (2014). Participants were recruited from two junior high schools in the Northwest.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 5 All 9 th grade students with parental consent who were present during the baseline assessment (N = 538) were given an opportunity to participate in the study. Of these, 513 (52% female, 48% male) students agreed to participate in the study. Participant ages ranged from 13 to 16 (M = 14.21, SD = 0.47). Participants were primarily Caucasian (74.5%), with 9.9% Hispanic, 5.5% Asian, 4.2% African-American, 3.6% American Indian/Alaskan Native, 1.5% Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander, and 0.8% other. Sixty-nine percent (N = 358) of the 518 participants completed the 6-month follow-up assessment. There were no differences on any demographic or outcome variables between those who completed the 6-month follow-up assessment and those who did not. 2.2. Procedure Two schools were randomly assigned to either the intervention group or control group (usual alcohol and drug education). All 9 th grade students registered at the two schools were eligible to participate. All parents of 9 th grade students were contacted by the school in late September via letter by mail at their permanent addresses provided by the registrar s office. Passive consent procedures were used. All students were recruited by the schools during regular class periods. Participants completed the baseline survey in October, the 3-month follow-up survey in January, and the 6- month follow-up survey in early May. Each survey took approximately 15 minutes to complete. The echeckup TO GO intervention and alcohol and drug eduction both took place in October. All students who participated in the baseline survey were invited to complete a 3-month survey and a 6-month survey. Students at the intervention and control schools competed the baseline survey within 2 weeks of eachother, the 3-month survey within 3 weeks, and the 6-month survey during the same week. Variations in timing were due to scheduling the school computer lab

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 6 where procedures took place. All study procedures were approved by the School District Research Board and the University Institutional Review Board approved secondary analysis of the database. 2.3. Measures Frequency of drinking was assessed using the Quantity Frequency Peak questionnaire (QFP; Dimeff et al., 1999; Marlatt et al., 1998). Participants were asked to indicate the frequency of drinking on an 8-point scale with options ranging from 0 (Do not drink alcohol at all) to 7 (Every day). Alcohol-related consequences were assessed using the Rutgers Alcohol Problem Index (RAPI, White & Labouvie, 1989). The RAPI is a 23-item self-administered screening tool for assessing adolescent problem drinking. Participants were asked how many times have the following scenarios happened to you while you were consuming alcohol or as a result of your drinking in the past 30 days. Responses were measured on a 5-point scale ranging from never to more than 10 times. A total consequence score was created by summing the 23 items. Cronbach s alpha for this sample was.96. 2.4. Intervention The echeckup TO GO (http://www.echeckuptogo.com/usa/) is a 30 minute intervention based on social norming theory and motivation enhancement models. The program is designed to change perceptions of peer drinking norms, alcohol beliefs, and alcohol expectancies by providing personalized normative feedback regarding alcohol use, feedback regarding individual risk factors for developing alcohol-related problems, and accurate information about alcohol and myths related to alcohol use. The program includes two sections: 1) online assessment and 2) personalized normative feedback. The online assessment consists of basic demographic information (e.g. sex, age, weight, living situation, class standing) and

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 7 information on alcohol consumption, drinking behavior, and alcohol-related consequences. Immediately following the assessment, individualized graphed feedback is provided. For a full description of the echeckup TO GO intervention, see Doumas and colleagues (2014). 2.5. Control School Alcohol and Drug Education The control school received the usual alcohol and drug education. This education is delivered by a school counselor as a classroom presentation on the health risks of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs, why people might choose to use substances, and peer refusal skills. 2.6. Statistical Analyses Baseline measures between intervention and control conditions were compared with t tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables. Outcome variables were examined with general linear model repeated measures analyses. Outcome variables were the within-subjects factor, study condition was the between-subjects factor, and ethnic background was a covariate. Effect size was calculated by eta squared ( 2 ). All analyses were conducted at p <.05. 3. Results 3.1 Preliminary Analyses The outcome variables were examined for skew and kurtosis at baseline and follow-up assessments. The distribution for alcohol-related consequences at baseline and follow-up assessments substantially deviated from the normal distribution (> 3 skew and > 9 kurtosis) so a logarithmic transformation was used to normalize the distributions (Tabachnick & Fidell, 2007). Raw descriptive statistics for the outcome variables at baseline and 6-month follow-up assessments are presented in Table 1.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 8 We examined differences on demographic variables and outcome variables between the two study conditions at baseline. There was a significantly higher percentage of Caucasian students in the intervention condition and a significantly higher percentage of Hispanic students in the control condition, 2 (6) = 21.76, p <.001. There were no other differences on demographic variables or outcome variables at baseline. 3.2 Outcome Analyses For detailed results for the 3-month follow-up, please see Doumas and colleagues (2014). At the 3-month follow-up, students in the intervention group reported a reduction in drinking frequency and alcohol-related consequences relative to those in the control group (Doumas et al. 2014). Analyses presented here examine differences between the two groups at the 6-month follow-up. Means and standard deviations for frequency of drinking and alcohol-related consequences at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up are reported in Table 1. Results of the repeated measures ANOVAs indicated no significant main effect for Time, Wilks Lambda = 1.00, F(1, 355) = 0.70, p =.40, 2 p =.00, or interaction effect for Time x Group, Wilks Lambda = 1.00, F(1, 355) = 0.98, p =.32, 2 p =.00, for frequency of drinking. Similarly, neither the main effect for Time, Wilks Lambda = 1.00, F(1, 355) = 0.13, p =.72, 2 p =.00, nor the interaction effect for Time x Group, Wilks Lambda = 1.00, F(1, 355) = 0.01, p =.94, 2 p =.00, were significant for alcohol-related consequences. 4. Discussion The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of a brief, web-based personalized normative feedback intervention on reducing alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences. In particular, we were interested in whether or not reductions in frequency of drinking and alcohol-

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 9 related consequences found at the 3-month follow-up (Doumas et al., 2014) would be sustained across the academic year. Results of this indicated no differences between the intervention group and control group for either frequency of drinking or alcohol-related consequences at the 6- month follow-up assessment. Thus, the reductions in drinking variables found at 3-months (Doumas et al., 2014) were not sustained through the academic year. In contrast to our results, prior research evaluating online interventions delivered to adolescents show reductions in drinking relative to control students at 6-month follow-up assessments (Newton et al., 2009; Shwinn et al., 2010). These studies, however, included significantly longer and more comprehensive interventions relative to the echeckup TO GO, with interventions consisting of 2 sets of 6 40-minute sessions and 12 25-minute sessions, respectively. In addition, research evaluating combined computer-based interventions for parents and teens indicates sustained effects for one year (Shinke et al., 2009) and up to 22 months (Konig et al., 2009). Thus, additional intervention strategies may be necessary to augment brief, web-based intervention programs for this age group. For example, booster sessions or repeated administration of the echeckup TO GO may be necessary to achieve sustained effects. Alternatively, intervention efficacy for this age group may be enhanced by the addition of parent-based interventions as the family is more salient during this developmental period relative to older adolescence (Cleveland, Feinberg, Bontempo, & Greenberg, 2008). These parent-based interventions may be delivered online or through a mailed handbook or brochure containing information specific to parental monitoring, beliefs and attitudes toward teen drinking, and parent-teen communication. It is also important to note the limitations of this study. These include reliance on selfreport and limited generalizability due to a primarily Caucasian sample form the Northwest

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 10 region. Future research with objective measures of drinking and alcohol-related consequences (e.g. school alcohol policy violation reports) and more diverse samples is warranted. Additionally, differential ethnicity rates between the intervention and control conditions potentially confounded findings. Although this concern was reduced by including ethnicity as a covariate in all analyses, the difference between the control and intervention groups, however, may be indicative of other differences between the school samples, such as socio-economic status and the results should be interpreted in light of this consideration. 5. Conclusion Results of this study have important implications for developing prevention and intervention programs for students as they transition into high school. As the transition to high school is marked by an increase in alcohol use, providing evidence-based programing through the schools for this age group is imperative. Web-based programs are well-suited for schoolbased implementation as they are inexpensive, require minimal training, can be implemented with high a high degree of fidelity, and are easy to disseminate to large groups of students within course curricula relative to in-person, multi-session programs. However, results indicate that brief, web-based interventions administered once and in the absence of a parent-based intervention may be effective in reducing drinking in the short-term, but reductions are not sustained throughout the academic year. Thus, additional interventions, such as booster sessions or repeated administration may be warranted. Additionally, because familial influences may exert an equal or stronger effect than peer influences during this developmental period, incorporating individual web-based programs into a comprehensive strategy which includes parent-based interventions may be important to increase intervention effects across the academic year.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 11 Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank Marianne King and Beverly Glouser for their assistance in participant recruitment and data collection. Funding for this study was provided in part by SAMHSA Grant 5H79SP017028-02. SAMHSA had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing the manuscript, or the decision to submit the paper for publication.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 12 References Cleveland, M. J., Feinberg, M. E., Bontempo, D. E., & Greenberg, M. T. (2008). The role of risk and protective factors in substance use across adolescence. Journal of Adolescent Health, 43, 157-164. Conrod, P. J., Stewart, S. H., Comeau, N., & Maclean, A. M. (2006). Preventative efficacy of cognitive behavioral strategies matched to the motivational bases of alcohol misuse in atrisk youth. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 35, 550 563. Courser, M. W., Shamblen, S. R., Lavrakas, P. J., Collins, D., & Ditterline, P. (2009). The impact of active consent procedures on nonresponse and nonresponse error in youth survey data: Evidence from a new experiment. Evaluation Review, (33), 370-395. Dimeff, L. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R. Marlatt, G. A. (1999). Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A harm reduction approach. New York: Guilford Press. Doumas, D. M., Esp, S., Turrisi, R., Hausheer, R., & Cuffee, C. (2014). A test of the efficacy of a brief, web-based personalized feedback intervention to reduce drinking among 9 th grade students. Addictive Behaviors, 39, 231-238. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. E. (2013). Monitoring the future national results on adolescent drug use: Overview of key findings, 2012. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan. Koning, I. N., Vollebergh, W. A. M., Smit, F., Verdurmen, J. E. E., van den Eijnden, R. J. J., ter Bogt, T. F. M., et al. (2009). Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): Cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously. Addiction, 104, 1669-1678.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 13 Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Dimeff, L. A., Larimer, M. E., Quigley, L. A., et al. (1998). Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 604-615. Miller, E. T., Neal, D. J., & Roberts, L. J., Baer, J. S., Cressler, S. O., Metrik, J., et al. (2002). Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet based assessment and traditional methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16, 56-63. Neal, D. J., & Carey, K. B. (2004). Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: Use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 281-297. Newton, N. C., Andrews, G., Teesson, M., & Vogl, L. E. (2009). Delivering prevention for alcohol and cannabis using the internet: A cluster randomised controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 48(6), 579 584. O Leary-Barrett, B. A., Macie, C. J., Castellanos-Ryan, N., Al-Khudhairy, N. & Conrod, P. (2010). Personality-targeted interventions delay uptake of drinking and decrease risk of alcohol-related problems when delivered by teachers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 49, 954-963. Schinke, S. P., Cole, K. C., & Fang, L. (2009). Gender-specific intervention to reduce underage drinking among early adolescent girls: A test of a computer-mediated, mother-daughter program. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 70(1), 70 77. Schinke, S. P., Di Noia, J., & Glassman, J. R. (2004). Computer mediated intervention to prevent drug abuse and violence among high-risk youth. Addictive Behaviors, 29, 225-229. Schinke, S. P., Fang, L., & Cole, K. C. (2009). Preventing substance use among adolescent

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 14 girls: 1-year outcomes of a computerized, mother-daughter program. Addictive Behaviors, 34(12), 1060 1064. Schwinn, T. M., Schinke, S. P., & Di Noia, J. (2010). Preventing drug abuse among adolescent girls: Outcome data from an Internet-based intervention. Prevention Science: The Official Journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 11(1), 24 32. Smith, D. C., Boel-Studt, S., Cleeland, L. (2009). Parental consent in adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome studies. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 37, 298-306. Sussman, S., Dent, C. W., & Stacy, A. W. (2002). Project towards no drug abuse: A review of the findings and future directions. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 354 364. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. White, H. R., Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 30-37.

WEB-BASED INTERVENTION 15 Table 1 Means and Standard Deviations for Outcome Variables at Baseline and 6-Month Follow-Up Baseline 6-Month Follow-up Intervention Control Intervention Control Outcomes Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Mean (SD) Frequency of Drinking 0.98 (1.39) 0.87 (1.37) 1.17 (1.60) 1.06 (1.71) Alcohol-Related Consequences 2.24 (5.34) 2.67 (6.65) 2.32 (6.52) 3.39 (8.78)