National Lung Screening Trial Results

Similar documents
A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

Screening Programs background and clinical implementation. Denise R. Aberle, MD Professor of Radiology and Engineering

6/6/2011. Recruitment methods employed in the. Pamela Marcus, PhD. National Cancer Institute NLST

Current Approach to Screening for Lung Cancer. James R Jett M.D.

Lessons learned for the conduct of a successful screening trial

Pulmonologist s Perspective

CT screening for lung cancer. Should it be done in the Indian context?

CT Screening for Lung Cancer for High Risk Patients

Outcomes in the NLST. Health system infrastructure needs to implement screening

Lung Cancer Screening

New Advances in Lung Cancer

Ultralow Dose Chest CT with MBIR

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: LUNG CANCER SCREENING: THE TIME HAS COME LUNG CANCER: A NATIONAL EPIDEMIC

Lung Cancer Screening: Now What?

Equity Issues with Lung Cancer Screening Prevent Cancer - Quantitative Imaging Workshop November 5-6, 2018 Alexandria, VA

Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(5):

Robert J. McKenna M.D. Chief, Thoracic Surgery Cedars Sinai Medical Center

Lung Cancer Screening: To screen or not to screen?

A Summary from the 2013World Conference on Lung Cancer Sydney, Australia

Lung Cancer Screening

The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST)

VHA Demonstration Project for Lung Cancer Screening Using Low-Dose Chest CT Screening

Lung Cancer Screening: Benefits and limitations to its Implementation

SCREENING FOR EARLY LUNG CANCER. Pang Yong Kek

The complex, intertwined role of patients in research and care

Disclosures. Overview. Selection the most accurate statement: Updates in Lung Cancer Screening 5/26/17. No Financial Disclosures

What to know and what to make of it

Lung Cancer and CT Screening

Lung Cancer Screening

Christine Argento, MD Interventional Pulmonology Emory University

Lung Cancer Risk Associated With New Solid Nodules in the National Lung Screening Trial

Social and Behavioral Sciences for Tobacco Use

Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography Screening in Pa6ents at Risk for Lung Cancer

Screening for Lung Cancer - State of the Art

SCBT-MR 2016 Lung Cancer Screening in Practice: State of the Art

Introduction and Background

Screening for Lung Cancer. Michael S. Nolledo, MD Deborah Heart and Lung Center

Veterans Health Administration Lung Cancer Screening Demonstration Project: Results & Lessons Learned

Open Access Review Article DOI: /cureus.589. Joshua Dajac 1, Jay Kamdar 1, Austin Moats 2, Brenda Nguyen 1

LUNG CANCER SCREENING: ON WHOM DID YOU DO IT AND ON WHOM DO YOU RESPOND TO THE RESULTS?

Professor John K Field PhD, FRCPath University of Liverpool Cancer Research Centre, UK.

Lung Cancer Screening In High Risk Populations:

Screening for Lung Cancer

Lung Cancer Screening. Eric S. Papierniak, DO NF/SG VHA UF Health

NCCN Guidelines as a Model of Extended Criteria for Lung Cancer Screening

The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team* A BS TR AC T

Example of lung screening

Lung Cancer Screening

Lung Cancer Screening Trials. Edward Harris Respiratory Research Fellow Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital

Lung Cancer Screening: Radiologic and Clinical Implications. Katherine R. Birchard, M.D. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

CT Low Dose Lung Cancer Screening. Part I. Journey to LDCT LCS Program

None

Lung Cancer Screening: Who, What, Why? Myths Dispelled

Goals of Presentation

Screening for Lung Cancer: Are We There Yet?

Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Results of Lake County Survey. Ferron & Associates for Children s Council of Lake County May 19, 2010

LDCT Screening. Steven Kirtland, MD. Virginia Mason Medical Center February 27, 2015

NC I CCC. A Comprehensive Cancer Center Designated by the National Cancer Institute

The status of Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines. Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

SHARED DECISION MAKING IN MEDICARE COVERAGE

Learning Objectives. 1. Identify which patients meet criteria for annual lung cancer screening

Lung Cancer Screening: To Screen or Not to Screen?

University of Connecticut. University of Connecticut Graduate School

Lung cancer screening in Switzerland

Americans Current Views on Smoking 2013: An AARP Bulletin Survey

Harnessing the Power of the DNP: Leading the Development and Implementation of an Evidence Based Clinical Program JOELLE FATHI, DNP, RN, ARNP, CTTS

Tobacco Use among VA Patients Receiving Lung Cancer Screening: Cessation at 1 year Post Screening

LUNG CANCER: LDCT DISCLOSURES NONE. Erika Swanson, MD Radiation Oncologist Ascension Columbia-St. Mary s February 1, /9/2018

Early Detection of Lung Cancer. Amsterdam March 5 th 2010

Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: Patterns of Use and Disparities

Smoking Status and Body Mass Index in the United States:

MEDICAL POLICY SUBJECT: LOW-DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (LDCT) FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING. POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Technology Assessment

Role of CT in Lung Cancer Screening: 2010 Stuart S. Sagel, M.D.

Objectives. Why? Why? Background 11/5/ % incurable disease at presentation Locally advanced disease Metastasis. 14% 5 year survival

Lung Cancer Screening: Current Status

Screening and Resistance to Cessation Efforts

Lung Cancer Screening. Ashish Maskey MD Interventional Pulmonology UK Health Care Dec 1 st 2017

Clinical Trials. Susan G. Fisher, Ph.D. Dept. of Clinical Sciences

Screening for Lung Cancer: New Guidelines, Old Problems

General principles of screening: A radiological perspective

Projected Outcomes Using Different Nodule Sizes to Define a Positive CT Lung Cancer Screening Examination

CLINICAL GUIDELINES. Lung-Cancer Screening Program Guidelines Robert Y. Kanterman, M.D. and Thomas J. Gilbert, M.D., M.P.P.

Center for Urban Initiatives and Research Wisconsin Public Health Survey December 2011 N=626. Frequency Tables (Weighted)

Cancer Screenings and Early Diagnostics

Risk-Based Cancer Screening: Insights from the NLST

American Cancer Society Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines

Indeterminate Pulmonary Nodules in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

Lung Cancer Screening: A review of the recommendations Friday, November 11th, 2016 from 11:45 to 12:15. Dr. Tunji Fatoye Dr.

Validation of two models to estimate the probability of malignancy in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules

SCBT-MR 2015 LungRADS : Basics

Comparison of three mathematical prediction models in patients with a solitary pulmonary nodule

Disparity Data Fact Sheet General Information

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: State Based Initiatives

Choosing Wisely. Objectives. Payal Sen PGY 1 Internal Medicine Residency Program University of New Mexico

LUNG CANCER SCREENING WHAT S THE IMPACT? Nitra Piyavisetpat, MD Department of Radiology Chulalongkorn University

Lung Cancer Screening

Subject: Low-Dose Helical (Spiral) Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening Guidance Number: MCG-137 Revision Date(s): 5/13/2015

Selected Controversies. Cancer Screening. Breast Cancer Screening. Selected Controversies. Page 1. Using Best Evidence to Guide Practice

Menthol Cigarettes, Smoking Cessation, Atherosclerosis and Pulmonary Function

CT Lung Screening Implementation Challenges: ALA/ATS Implementation Microsite

Transcription:

National Lung Screening Trial Results Ella A. Kazerooni, M.D. Professor & Director Cardiothoracic Radiology Associate Chair for Clinical Affairs University of Michigan

NLST STOPPED! Lung cancer trial results show mortality benefit with low-dose CT 11/4/10 NCI Press Conference & Press Release The trials independent Data Safety Monitoring Board notified the NCI Director that the accumulated data provided statistically convincing answer to the study s primary question. This is the first time that we have seen clear evidence of a significant reduction in lung cancer mortality with a screening test in a randomized controlled trial. Christine Berg if low-dose helical CT screening is implemented responsibly and individuals with abnormalities are judiciously followed, we have the potential to save thousands of lives. Denise Aberle

NLST: Interim Primary Endpoint Analysis Reported by DSMB Oct. 20, 2010 Arm Person years (py) Lung cancer deaths Lung cancer mortality per 100,000 py Reduction in lung cancer mortality (%) Value of test statistic Efficacy boundary CT 144,097.6 354 245.7 20.3 3.21 2.02 CXR 143,363.5 442 308.3 Deficit of lung cancer deaths in CT arm exceeds that expected by chance, even allowing for multiple looks at the data

NLST: Interim Secondary Endpoint Analysis Reported by DSMB Oct. 20, 2010 Arm Person years (py) Deaths All-cause mortality per 100,000 py Reduction in all-cause mortality (%) Value of test statistic Value for significance CT 167,389.9 1870 1117.2 6.9 2.27 1.96 CXR 166,328.2 1996 1200.0 Deficit of deaths in CT arm exceeds that expected by chance.

NLST: Subjects Age & Gender

NLST: Subjects Race/Ethnicity

NLST: Subjects Smoking History

NLST: Family History of Lung Cancer CT CXR Total Any first degree relative 21.8 % 21.7 % 21.7 % Two or more first degree relatives 3.3 % 3.2 % 3.3 %

NLST Demographics vs. US Population U.S Census Department Tobacco Use Supplement of Continuing Population Survey for 2002-2004 Information on 240,000 respondents Reviewed subset of respondents aged 55-74, with 30+ pack year smoking, either current smoker or former smoker who quit within the past 15 years Identified smoking status, age, sex, race, ethnicity, marital status, and education

NLST Demographics vs. US Population NLST US Census Male (%) 59.0 58.5 Age 55-59 (%) 42.8 35.2 60-64 (%) 30.6 29.3 65-69 (%) 17.8 20.8 70-74 (%) 8.8 14.7 Race/ethnicity Black (%) 4.4 5.5 Hispanic (%) 1.7 2.4

NLST Demographics vs. US Population NLST US Census Married 66.6 60.0 Education < HS 6.1 21.3 College 31.5 14.4 Current smoker 48.2 57.1 Median pack years 48.0 47.0

NLST Demographics vs. US Population Compared with similar US population, NLST subjects have: similar gender distribution and smoking exposure are younger better educated less likely to be current smokers

Screening Exam Compliance & Crossover Study Year CT CXR Total Expected Screened Expected Screened Expected Screened T0 26,713 98.5% 26,722 97.5% 53,435 98.0% T1 26,282 94.0% 26,398 91.3% 52,680 92.6% T2 25,935 92.9% 26,097 89.5% 52,032 91.2% Compliance: 95% CT arm & 93% CXR arm Crossover: 4.3% in LSS CXR arm underwent CT

NLST: Screen Positivity* Rate CT CXR Screening Round # screened # positive % positive # screened # positive % positive 1 26,309 7,191 27.3 26,035 2,387 9.2 2 24,715 6,901 27.9 24,089 1,482 6.2 3 24,102 4,054 16.8** 23,346 1,174 5.0** All 3 75,126 18,146 24.1 73,499 5,043 6.9 *A positive screen is one that may be suspicious for lung cancer. **A suspicious abnormality that has been stable for 3 rounds may be called negative according to protocol.

NLST: True and False Positive Screens CT CXR Round 1 N (%) Round 2 N (%) Round 3 N (%) Round 1 N (%) Round 2 N (%) Round 3 N (%) Total positives 7,193 (100) 6,902 (100) 4,054 (100) 2,387 (100) 1,482 (100) 1,175 (100) With lung cancer 270 (4) 168 (2) 211 (5) 136 (6) 65 (4) 78 (7) Without lung cancer 6,923 (96) 6,734 (98) 3,843 (95) 2,251 (94) 1,417 (96) 1,097 (93)

indeterminate lung nodule

NLST (+) CT screen & diagnostic tests 1.4% experienced a complication 28% among those determined to have lung cancer 0.35% determined to not have lung cancer 16 deaths due to medical interventions hastened the death of 16 people of the 16, 10 had lung cancer and 6 did not risk of death in non-cancer patients 0.024%

NLST: Clinically Significant Non Lung Cancer CT CXR Screening Round # screened # positive % positive # screened # positive % positive 1 26,309 2695 10.2 26,035 785 3.0 2 24,715 1519 6.1 24,089 429 1.8 3 24,102 1408 5.8 23,346 361 1.5 All 3 75,126 5622 7.5 73,499 1575 2.1

NLST: Cumulative # of Lung Cancers

NLST: Cumulative # of Lung Cancer Deaths

Kaplan-Meier Curves for Lung Cancer Mortality

Kaplan-Meier Curves for All-Cause Mortality

Kaplan-Meier Curves for Lung Cancer Case Survival (Lung Cancer Cause of Death) Table 11.5.3d

National Lung Screening Trial Results Ella A. Kazerooni, M.D. Professor & Director Cardiothoracic Radiology Associate Chair for Clinical Affairs University of Michigan