Changes in cellular HIV DNA levels during the MONET trial: 144 Weeks of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus DRV/r + 2NRTIs

Similar documents
Purpose Methods Demographics of patients in the study Outcome. Efficacy Adverse Event. Limitation

Virological suppression and PIs. Diego Ripamonti Malattie Infettive - Bergamo

Research Article Efficacy of Once Daily Darunavir/Ritonavir in PI-Na\ve, NNRTI-Experienced Patients in the ODIN Trial

Introduction. Abstract. Key words. Diego Ripamonti 1, Andrew Hill 2, Erkki Lauthouwers 3, Yvon van Delft 4 and Christiane Moecklinghoff 5 1

Bonaventura Clotet. HIV Unit & Retroviroloy Lab Univ Hosp Germans Trias i Pujol Badalona, Catalonia, Spain

Professor José Arribas

What are the most promising opportunities for dose optimisation?

Optimizing the treatment

CROI 2017 Review: Novel ART Strategies

Professor Anna Maria Geretti

VIKING STUDIES Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir in treatment-experienced subjects

How to best manage HIV patient?

Clinical support for reduced drug regimens. David A Cooper The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia

12th European AIDS Conference / EACS ARV Therapies and Therapeutic Strategies A CME Newsletter

Second and third line paediatric ART strategies

The results of the ARTEN study. Vicente Soriano Hospital Carlos III, Madrid, Spain

Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies: Clinical Case Presentation

Anna Maria Geretti on behalf of co-authors Professor of Virology & Infectious Diseases, University of Liverpool Expert Scientist, Roche Pharma

ABC/3TC/ZDV ABC PBO/3TC/ZDV

Reduced Drug Regimens

ID Week 2016: HIV Update

Safety and efficacy of darunavir/ritonavir in treatment-experienced pediatric patients aged 3 to <6 years: Week 48 analysis of the ARIEL trial

Treatment strategies for the developing world

Are the current doses of ARV correct. Richard Elion MD Associate Adjunct Clinical Professor of Medicine Johns Hopkins School of Medicine

Switching ARV Regimens: Managing Toxicity and Improving Tolerability; Switches & Class-Sparing Approaches

VIKING STUDIES. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir. treatment-experienced subjects

Scottish Medicines Consortium

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

Second-Line Therapy NORTHWEST AIDS EDUCATION AND TRAINING CENTER

Management of patients with antiretroviral treatment failure: guidelines comparison

Efficacy and Safety of Doravirine 100mg QD vs Efavirenz 600mg QD with TDF/FTC in ART-Naive HIV-Infected Patients: Week 24 Results

Real Life Experience of Dolutegravir and Lamivudine Dual Therapy As a Switching Regimen in HIVTR Cohort

ART Treatment. ART Treatment

Does Resistance Still Matter? Daniel R. Kuritzkes, M.D. Division of Infectious Diseases Brigham and Women s Hospital Harvard Medical School

Statistical issues in HIV trial design. Andrew Hill Senior Visiting Research Fellow Liverpool University

The next generation of ART regimens

Switching strategies and ARV treatment costs

Tools to Monitor HIV Infection in 2013 and Beyond.

The legally binding text is the original French version TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 14 December 2011

Dolutegravir Attributes

Switching antiretroviral therapy to safer strategies based on integrase inhibitors. Pedro Cahn

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centers: Indication: Treatment: Objective:

Updates to the HHS Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in Adults and Adolescents Living with HIV Updated October 17, 2017

Scottish Medicines Consortium

François Raffi, 1 Christine Katlama, 2 Michael Saag, 3 Martin Wilkinson, 6 Jain Chung, 5 Lynn Smiley, 4 and Miklos Salgo 5

Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors on the Horizon

Didactic Series. CROI New Antiretroviral Therapies. Daniel Lee, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine UCSD Medical Center Owen Clinic July 14, 2016

Kimberly Adkison, 1 Lesley Kahl, 1 Elizabeth Blair, 1 Kostas Angelis, 2 Herta Crauwels, 3 Maria Nascimento, 1 Michael Aboud 1

STRIBILD (aka. The Quad Pill)

Jennifer R King, Amit Khatri, Roger Trinh, Bifeng Ding, Jiuhong Zha and Rajeev Menon AbbVie Inc.

MDR HIV and Total Therapeutic Failure. Douglas G. Fish, MD Albany Medical College Albany, New York Cali, Colombia March 30, 2007

Bon Usage des Antirétroviraux dans l Infection par le VIH

ABT-493/ABT-530 M Clinical Study Report Post-Treatment Week 12 Primary Data R&D/16/0144. Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

Duration of first line antiretroviral therapy (ART) in children in the European Pregnancy and Paediatric HIV Cohort Collaboration (EPPICC)

Management of Treatment-Experienced Patients: New Agents and Rescue Strategies. Joel E. Gallant, MD, MPH Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Didactic Series. CROI 2014 Update. March 27, 2014

HIV Treatment: New and Veteran Drugs Classes

Perspectivesconcernantles InhibiteursNon Nucléosidiquesde la Transcriptase Inverse (INNTI)

Q and A - the PARTNER Study: new results from PARTNER 2

Cabotegravir + Rilpivirine as Long-Acting Maintenance Therapy: LATTE-2 Week 32 Results

DNA Genotyping in HIV Infection

BHIVA Best of CROI Feedback Meetings. London Birmingham North West England Cardiff Gateshead Edinburgh

HIGH VIRAL LOAD AND TREATMENT RESPONSE

Central Nervous System Penetration of ARVs: Does it Matter?

Supplemental Digital Content 1. Combination antiretroviral therapy regimens utilized in each study

SINGLE. Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects

Abstract PS8/2. Double-blind treatment phase D/C/F/TAF. + matching D/C + F/TDF placebo D/C/F/TAF. D/C + F/TDF + matching D/C/F/TAF placebo

Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in HCV GT 1 or 4 & Prior DAA Treatment MAGELLAN-1 (Part 2)

Resistance Analyses of Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors within Phase 3 Clinical Trials of Treatment-Naive Patients

Pitavastatin 4 mg vs. Pravastatin 40 mg in HIV Dyslipidemia: Post- Hoc Analysis of the INTREPID Trial Based on the Independent CHD Risk Factor for Age

Rajesh T. Gandhi, M.D.

Antiviral Therapy 2013; 18: (doi: /IMP2329)

HIV Treatment Update. Anton Pozniak Consultant Physician, Director of HIV Services Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London

Switching from combination antiretroviral therapy to DOlutegravir MONOtherapy in virologically suppressed HIV-1 infected adults:

Paediatric Infectious Diseases Unit, Red Cross War Memorial Children s Hospital & University of Cape Town

Congress report: XV Congreso Panamericano De Infectología the PROGRESS Study

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives:

NUEVOS ENFOQUES TERAPEUTICOS

Anumber of clinical trials have demonstrated

The FIND-CKD Study Background Study design (Results)

The legally binding text is the original French version. Opinion 28 May J05AE10 (protease inhibitor class of antiretrovirals)

Introduction. Cahn et al. Andean Pacific HIV Clinical Forum 2017; Santiago, Chile. Abstract 2.

British HIV Association Guidelines for the Management of Hepatitis Viruses in Adults Infected with HIV 2013 Appendix 2

DRUGS IN PIPELINE. Pr JC YOMBI UCL-AIDS REFERENCE CENTRE BREACH Sept 27, 2015

RESEARCH B/F/TAF in Treatment-Naïve HIV-1 and HIV-1 RNA Suppressed Switch Patients

CROI 2013: New Drugs for Treatment and PrEP

1. Africa Centre for Health and Population Studies 2. London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine 3. University College London

Week 48 efficacy and central nervous system analysis of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus darunavir/ ritonavir with two nucleoside analogues

Is there a need for combination therapy? No. Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona. Spain

PRO140 SC Monotherapy (MT) Provides Long-Term, Full Virologic Suppression in HIV Patients

CL Vavro, 1 J Huang, 2 C Avatapally, 1 S Min, 1 and M Ait-Khaled 3. GlaxoSmithKline: 1 Research Triangle Park,NC, USA; 2 Toronto, ON, Canada; 3

Simplifying Antiretroviral Therapy Regimens: It s not so simple

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424136

Development of a protease inhibitor-based single-tablet complete HIV-1 regimen of darunavir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir

Caring for HIV infected patients in Spain during the current economical crisis

Treating HCV Genotype 2 & 3

Application for Inclusion of Emtricitabine On WHO Model List of Essential Medicines. Submitted By. Gilead Sciences, Inc. Foster City, California, USA

Dr Claire Townsend on behalf of EPPICC. Presented at the 2 nd International Workshop on HIV Pediatrics July 2010, Vienna Austria

DOI: /hiv British HIV Association HIV Medicine (2014), 15, SHORT COMMUNICATION

Clinical cases: HIV/HCV coinfection

Transcription:

Changes in cellular HIV DNA levels during the MONET trial: 144 Weeks of darunavir/ritonavir monotherapy versus DRV/r + 2NRTIs Anna Maria Geretti, Jose R Arribas, Johan Vingerhoets, Geraldine Foster, Sabine Kinloch, Andrew Hill, Yvon van Delft, Christiane Moecklinghoff 10 th European Meeting on HIV & Hepatitis Treatment Strategies & Antiviral Drug Resistance 28 30 March 2012, Barcelona, Spain [abstract O-06]

Background In virologically suppressed patients, switching to DRV/r monotherapy can maintain HIV RNA suppression with no treatment-emergent drug resistance. Effects of PI monotherapy on HIV DNA levels are unknown.

MONET Trial Design Inclusion: Taking 2 NRTI + either NNRTI or boosted PI at screening (stratified) HIV RNA <50 copies/ml for at least 6 months, no prior use of darunavir (DRV) No history of virological failure DRV/r 800/100 mg OD + 2 NRTI (re-optimised at baseline) n = 129 Follow-up phase 96 weeks 256 subjects DRV/r 800/100 mg OD n = 127 BL, 4, 12, 24, 36, 48 weeks Follow-up phase 96 weeks 96 wks Primary Endpoint: failure at week 48 (TLOVR). Per Protocol, Switch = Failure 2 consecutive HIV RNA > 50 copies/ml (Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay 1.5) Discontinuation of study drugs. Stopping DRV/r Stopping NRTIs in the control arm (switches in NRTIs were permitted at any time).

Methods HIV RNA was tested at each patient visit, using the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor assay 1.5, at a single central laboratory Levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and hs-c Reactive Protein (hs-crp) were measured at Week 144. HIV DNA was also tested from available stored PBMC samples, at baseline, Week 48, Week 96 and Week 144 using a real-time PCR assay (lower limit of quantification = 6 copies/10 6 PBMC) Changes in HIV DNA over time were compared between the treatment arms using all available data (on treatment analysis). HIV DNA levels were correlated with CD4 nadir, HIV RNA elevations and the inflammatory markers IL-6 and hs-crp

Baseline Characteristics (ITT) Baseline characteristics DRV/r +2NRTI (n=129) DRV/r (n=127) Age, years (median, range) Male (%) Caucasian (%) 44 (24-72) 83% 90% 43 (25-67) 78% 92% Disease characteristics CD4 count (mean, cells/µl) CD4 <350 cells/µl (%) Duration of prior ARVs, years (mean, sd) Use of PI at screening (%) Use of NNRTI at screening (%) On their first NRTI combination PI naïve Hep B Surface Antigen, positive, n (%) Hep C Antibody, positive, n (%) 579 12% 6.5 (4.09) 57% 36% 47% 28% 0 15 (12%) 571 14% 7.4 (4.13) 54% 42% 35% 23% 0 23 (18%)

HIV RNA <50 copies/ml at Week 144, TLOVR, Switch=failure Per Protocol analysis (PP) Intent to Treat analysis (ITT) 100% 90% 80% 70% HIV RNA <50 by Week 144 (%) 60% 50% 40% 30% 77.7% 72.1% 75.2% 69.3% 20% 10% 0% DRV/r + 2NRTI (PP) DRV/r mono (PP) DRV/r + 2NRTI (ITT) DRV/r mono (ITT) n=121 n=122 n=129 n=127

HIV RNA by study visit (observed data only patients still on randomised treatment) 100% Percentage of patients with HIV RNA: DRV/r + 2 NRTIs >1000 copies/ml 400-1000 copies/ml 50-400 copies/ml <50 copies/ml 100% DRV/r 80% 80% 60% 60% 40% 40% 20% 20% 0% 0% SCR 0 4 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 112 128 144 SCR 0 4 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 112 128 144 Time on treatment - weeks Time on treatment - weeks

HIV DNA: changes over time by treatment arm Mean and Median Log 10 HIV DNA versus time, by treatment group (patients with paired baseline and on-treatment data) DRV/r DRV/r+2NRTIs Time Weeks Mean Log 10 HIV DNA Mean Log 10 HIV DNA n ±SE Median n ±SE Median Baseline 71 2.50 ±0.058 2.57 59 2.59 ±0.048 2.59 WK 48 12 2.40 ±0.139 2.42 5 2.69 ±0.159 2.74 WK 96 10 2.25 ±0.167 2.34 10 2.51 ±0.095 2.52 WK 144 50 2.49 ±0.066 2.64 44 2.61 ±0.054 2.65 Mean and Median change from baseline in Log 10 HIV DNA, by treatment group (patients with paired baseline and on-treatment data) DRV/r DRV/r+2NRTIs Time weeks Mean Log 10 HIV DNA Mean Log 10 HIV DNA n ±SE Median n ±SE Median WK 48 12-0.10 ±0.149 0.06 5 0.01 ±0.080-0.01 WK 96 10-0.08 ±0.151-0.03 10-0.09 ±0.068-0.12 WK 144 50-0.05 ±0.049-0.03 44 0.03 ±0.039 0.01

HIV DNA: correlation with CD4 nadir (p=0.03) Log 10 HIV DNA by CD4 nadir HIV DNA - combined treatment arms Nadir CD4 count N Mean Log 10 HIV DNA ±SE Median < 200 cells/ul 84 2.64 ±0.047 2.68 >= 200 cells/ul 138 2.51 ±0.038 2.57 p=0.03 CD4 nadir >100 cells/µl was an inclusion criterion for the MONET trial. Patients needed to have CD4 counts at least 200 cells/µl at the screening visit.

HIV DNA: correlation with elevations in HIV RNA Log 10 HIV DNA for patients with HIV RNA elevations >50 copies/ml during the trial, versus no elevations HIV RNA category At least one HIV RNA >=50 No HIV RNA above 50 p<0.05 DRV/r DRV/r+2NRTIs N Mean Log 10 HIV DNA ±SE Median n Mean Log 10 HIV DNA ±SE Median 40 2.75 ±0.053 2.76 32 2.84 ±0.058 2.80 73 2.38 ±0.058 2.34 77 2.51 ±0.045 2.54 In both treatment arms, HIV DNA levels were higher for patients with at least one elevation In HIV RNA >= 50 copies/ml, compared to patients with HIV RNA consistently below 50 copies/ml At individual patient visits, mean HIV DNA was: 2.48 log 10 copies for samples with HIV RNA <5 copies/ml 2.72 log 10 copies for samples with HIV RNA 5-50 copies/ml 2.82 log 10 copies for samples with HIV RNA >50 copies/ml

IL-6 or hs-crp above pre-defined limits at Week 144 Treatment arm Marker DRV/r + 2NRTIs DRV/r mono IL-6 >3 pg/ml 20/65 (31%) 15/64 (23%) CRP > 5 mg/l 8/80 (10%) 9/75 (12%) There was no significant correlation between HIV DNA levels at Week 144 and levels of the inflammatory markers hs-crp or Interleukin-6 (p=n.s.).

Conclusions In the Monet trial, HIV DNA levels remained stable during 144 weeks of either DRV/r monotherapy or DRV/r + 2NRTIs. Higher HIV DNA levels were seen in patients with nadir CD4 counts below 200 cells/µl and/or detectable plasma HIV RNA. There was no difference in levels of IL-6 or hs-crp between the arms at Week 144. Levels of these inflammatory markers did not correlate with HIV DNA levels. We only have information on a subset of patients at Week 144. This was a post-hoc analysis of available stored samples.

Thanks to the patients, investigators and study coordinators who participated in the MONET trial Recruitment by country Switzerland 0.8% UK 8.2% Austria 6.3% Belgium 9.4% Spain 18.8% Denmark 10.9% Russia 4.3% Portugal 5.5% Germany 10.9% Poland 11.3% Italy 6.3% Hungary Israel 4.3% 3.1% Display GEN 67