Project Charter. Template v2 June 3, February 25, Name of Project: Prostate Cancer (PrCa) Therapeutic Area Data Standards

Similar documents
CDISC BrCa TAUG & Oncology Information Session

CDISC Public Webinar- Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Therapeutic Area User Guide

CFAST Asthma Project. Rhonda Facile. CDISC International Interchange Session 4B: Therapeutic Area Standards in Action November 6, 2013

How to manage changes to CDISC standards at Novo Nordisk. PhUSE EU Connect 2018 Sune Dandanell and Mikkel Traun

CDISC Public Webinar- Huntington's Disease Therapeutic Area User Guide

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. 9 Mar 2015

Robin Feldman, MBA & Joy Esterlitz, MS NINDS CDE Team The Emmes Corporation Rockville, MD USA. Thursday, September 14, 2017

Clinical Global Impression (CGI)

Design and Construct Efficacy Analysis Datasets in Late Phase Oncology Studies

Pain Relief (PR) Notes to Readers

Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Anchored (BPRS-A)

ADaM Considerations and Content in the TA User Guides. Susan J Kenny, PhD Maximum Likelihood, Inc.

Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-Anchored (BPRS-A)

Breast Cancer TAUG Overview and Implementation

Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS)

Modified Hachinski Ischemic Scale: NACC Version (MHIS-NACC) v.1.0

Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI)

CDISC CONTROLLED TERMINOLOGY. Presented by Chris Gemma and Erin Muhlbradt, Ph.D.

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

Timed Up and Go (TUG)

Short-Form McGill Pain Questionniare-2 (SHORT-FORM MPQ-2)

Critical Path Institute Coalition Against Major Diseases (CAMD) Alzheimer s Clinical Trial Database

CDISC SHARE. CDISC Shared Health and Research Electronic Library Pilot Report. Date: 19 January 2010 Version: 1.0 CDISC, 2010

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17-Item (HAMD 17)

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Baseline (C-SSRS BASELINE)

SDTM, Implementation Guide, and User Guide Updates

Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS)

Let s Create Standard Value Level Metadata

Program Overview March 2014

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Baseline (C-SSRS BASELINE)

Jerry Salyers, Accenture Accelerated R&D Services Fred Wood, Accenture Accelerated R&D Services. PhUSE 2017 Edinburgh, Scotland Paper #DS05

Standards for Analyzable Submission Datasets for Directed Safety Analyses

Intervention ML: Mapping of Meal data. Rahul Loharkar, inventiv Health Clinical, Pune, India Sandeep Sawant, inventiv Health Clinical, Mumbai, India

Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale Baseline (C-SSRS BASELINE)

PROPOSED WORK PROGRAMME FOR THE CLEARING-HOUSE MECHANISM IN SUPPORT OF THE STRATEGIC PLAN FOR BIODIVERSITY Note by the Executive Secretary

Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD)

PharmaSUG Paper DS12

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE. Proposed Health Technology Appraisal

Trial record 1 of 1 for: GO28341 Previous Study Return to List Next Study

Data Sharing Consortiums and Large Datasets to Inform Cancer Diagnosis

CDISC Controlled Terminology. Presented by Chris Gemma and Erin Muhlbradt, Ph.D.

Denosumab (AMG 162) for bone metastases from solid tumours and multiple myeloma

SDTMIG v3.3 Batch 2 Upcoming Public Review. Presented by Fred Wood

Denominator Criteria (Eligible Cases): Patient encounter during the performance period (CPT): 78300, 78305, 78306, 78315, 78320

Row same as start date 513) Examples for Treatments Major Issue Closed

Program Overview June 2014

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. 26 Mar 2015

Clinical Pathway Development: Alberta Health Services and Addiction & Mental Health

CDISC - Mapping New Pathways for Novartis. Darren Weston, Project Leader Pat Majcher, Senior Principal Programmer

PharmaSUG 2018 Paper AD-02

A Framework for Optimal Cancer Care Pathways in Practice

bone HEALTH IN FOCUS UNDERSTANDING THE IMPORTANCE OF BONE HEALTH WHEN LIVING WITH METASTATIC BREAST CANCER

NCIC CTG Overview and Opportunities. Ralph Meyer Director, NCIC CTG

National Strategy and Action Plan for Invasive Alien Species Control in Sri Lanka

Request for Proposals

Analysis of Oncology Studies for Programmers and Statisticians

Common Criteria. for. CGIAR Research Proposal (CRP) Design and Assessment

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

The Oncofertility Consortium : Policy and Guidelines Statement

Data Management and CDISC Formatting for Transdermal Patches Lois Lynn, Noven Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Jersey City, NJ

National Program of Cancer Registries Advancing E-cancer Reporting and Registry Operations (NPCR-AERRO): Activities Overview

The future of ODM. FH-Prof. Dr. Jozef Aerts University of Applied Sciences FH Joanneum Graz, Austria

Cancer Improvement Plan Update. September 2014

Murtha Cancer Center The DoD Cancer Center of Excellence

Recommendations from Programmatic Review on Disease Pathway Management. Date: June 12, 2010

Liver Forum Cirrhosis Working Group Arun J. Sanyal

Whither knowledge translation: An international research agenda

Activity Report April 2012 March 2013

BRIEFING PAPER THE USE OF RED FLAGS TO IDENTIFY SERIOUS SPINAL PATHOLOGY THE CHRISTIE, GREATER MANCHESTER & CHESHIRE. Version:

Request for Applications Basic, Clinical and Population Science Pilot Awards

National Cancer Programme. Work Plan 2014/15

WHO s code of conduct for open and timely sharing of pathogen genetic sequence data during outbreaks of infectious disease

2017 CURE - Sleep and Epilepsy Award Request for Applications (RFA) with LOI & Full Proposal Guidelines

Combining Archetypes with Fast Health Interoperability Resources in Future-proof Health Information Systems

Now Available: Final Rule for FDAAA 801 and NIH Policy on Clinical Trial Reporting

Leveraging Standards for Effective Visualization of Early Efficacy in Clinical Trial Oncology Studies

NIH NEW CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS AND FORMS-E

Health informatics Digital imaging and communication in medicine (DICOM) including workflow and data management

Uses of the NIH Collaboratory Distributed Research Network

The openehr approach. Background. Approach. Heather Leslie, July 17, 2014

EHR/CR Functional Profile & HIMSS 2008 Update

Study Endpoint Considerations: Final PRO Guidance and Beyond

The COMET Handbook: version 1.0

UC Brain Tumor Center Molecular Therapeutics Pilot Grant Program 2013/2014

VALUE OF PSA AS TUMOUR MARKER OF RELAPSE AND RESPONSE. ELENA CASTRO Spanish National Cancer Research Centre

Pre-marketing Assessment of Drug Safety

Clovis Oncology Announces Q Operating Results and Corporate Update. November 3, :05 PM ET

ALS ACT (Accelerated Therapeutics)

FDA Approved Indication(s) Firmagon is indicated for treatment of advanced prostate cancer.

Semantic Alignment between ICD-11 and SNOMED-CT. By Marcie Wright RHIA, CHDA, CCS

Systems Engineering Guide for Systems of Systems. Summary. December 2010

ISSUE BRIEF Conference on Clinical Cancer Research November 2014

REVIEW MANAGEMENT. Clinical Review of Drugs to Reduce the Risk of Cancer CONTENTS

SDTM Oncology Domains: From Pa5ent to Data to Narra5ve

CDISC Public Webinar Standards Updates and Additions. 25 Sep 2014

REPORT. A Model Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century

DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION. Clinical Commissioning Policy Proposition: Palliative radiotherapy for bone pain

Progress from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI)

Transcription:

Project Charter Template v2 June 3, 2015 Name of Project: Prostate Cancer (PrCa) Therapeutic Area Data Standards February 25, 2016 Project Manager: John Owen 1. Scope of Prostate Cancer Therapeutic Area Project 1.1. Project Description The Prostate Cancer therapeutic area standards project is being performed under the CFAST initiative to accelerate clinical research and medical product development by facilitating the creation and maintenance of data standards, tools, and methods for conducting research in therapeutic areas important to public health. The Prostate Cancer Project will collaborate with the SHARE team to develop Biomedical Concepts and untilze the SHARE ecosystem tools available in the development of the PrCa TAUG. This will form a template for the development of future TAUG s. Biomedical Concept spreadsheets for Lab Tests, Pathology Tests and QRS Instruments will be developed and included in the SHARE metadata repository. Templates exist for Lab Tests and QRS Intruments, however, a Biomedical Concept spreadsheet template will be developed for Pathology Tests. 1.2. Disease Characteristics > 90% prostate cancer cases occur in men over the age of 50. Symptoms of prostate cancer in later stages can include difficulty urinating, blood present in the urine and pelvic pain when urinating. 1.3. Type of Studies The project scope will include Phase 1 through Phase 4 clinical trials. 1.4. Focus Population This project pertains to treating male adults with Prostate Cancer. 1.5. Specific Indications This project will focus on concepts to advanced prostate cancer with a focus on Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (CPRC) Metastatic Prostate Cancer 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 1 of 6

1.6. Proposed Scope The project is scoped to achieve its deliverables within a time frame of 10 months as agreed by CFAST. The PrCa project is an FDA grant-funded project and these timelines have been communicated to the FDA PrCa representatives. Those rows highlighted in yellow are concepts where Biomedical Concept Spreadsheet data will be created for loading into the SHARE Ecosystem Disease History Type of Data Magnitude Gap Analysis Radiation Treatment History Medication Treatment History Surgical Treatment History Low-Medium Will develop concepts specific to prostate cancer disease history utilizing those that have already been developed for the Breast Cancer project. Low Expected to make use of the concepts developed in the Breast Cancer Project. Low - Medium - Expected to make use of the concepts developed in the Breast Cancer Project with additional development of CDASH CRF s for prior antineoplastic therapy, and infusion drugs (both as concomitant/prior medication and as study treatment). Low - Expected to make use of the concepts developed in the Breast Cancer Project Disease History data utilizing existing standards. Associated domains: MH radiation treatment history data utilizing existing standards. Associated domains: PR medication treatment history data utilizing existing standards. Development of CDASH CRF s to collect medication treatment history data. Associated domains: CM surgical treatment history data utilizing existing standards. 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 2 of 6

Pathology/Lab tests Type of Data Magnitude Gap Analysis Assessment of bone lesions per PCWG2 RECIST Skeletal Related Events High 23 Prostate Cancer Specific Pathology/lab concepts will be developed. The TAUG will focus on example development on how to represent this data in SDTM Medium Bone involvement is an important concept in advanced prostate cancer since spread of the disease often involves lesions in the bone. Low - Already covered as a concept in breast cancer. We will be evaluating any specifics that need highlighting for prostate cancer during the concept development phase Medium Focus will be on the development of CDASH complaint CRF s Associated domains: PR Development of Pathology biomedical concept spreadsheet template. pathology/lab test data utilizing existing standards. Additional Controlled Terminology will be pending investigation during Associated domains: LB SDTM Modeling will be investigated further during concept development with potential alignment of the modeling with that for RECIST. stage 1 Associated domains: TU/TR/RS Covered in existing TU/TR/RS domains. stage 1 Associated domains: TU/TR/RS Radiotherapy to bone metastases would be recorded in PR Surgery to bone metastases would be recorded in PR Pathologic bone fracture would be recorded in AE or CE Spinal cord compression would be recorded in AE or CE 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 3 of 6

QRS Type of Data Magnitude Gap Analysis High - 15 scales identified during scoping. Endpoints using QRS instruments are important especially in advanced prostate cancer where bone/pain involvement is assessed. stage 1 Associated domains: CE Gap analysis still ongoing with team members who are QRS specialists Anticipating having to develop metadata for 9 out of 15 scales (the others already have supplements created) Development would follow the existing QRS defined process. Review of the Pain TAUG to be done. Associated domains: QS 1.7. Project Deliverables Therapeutic Area Standards User Guide (TAUG) that will include: Essential core biomedical concepts with definitions, data types (simple & ISO 21090) and SDTM mappings Concept maps of disease area research concepts CDASH metadata for selected research concepts Selected annotated CRFs (with CDASH and SDTM-based annotations) SDTM examples, as appropriate Minimum terminology value sets (code lists) with definitions and C-Codes, as appropriate Inclusion of analysis guidelines will continue to be evaluated by the project team. If deemed appropriate and resource is available, may include the following: o Identification of the data needed for endpoint derivations, but not the actual statistical analyses of endpoints. o Description of how the clinical endpoints translate into statistical endpoints. o Examples of ADaM compliant analysis datasets. o Selected example table shells/figures and illustrations (via analysis results metadata) of the crosswalk from the ADaM dataset(s) to the analysis. Project deliverables will reference sources and describe provenance used in their creation. 1.8. Project Milestones The project will follow the enhanced therapeutic area standards development process. High-level project plan: Project Stage Project Stage Description Timeline (End) Stage 0 Scoping & Planning October 2015 Stage 1 Concept Modeling February 2016 Stage 2 Standards Development April 2016 Stage 3a Internal Review May 2016 Stage 3b Public Review July 2016 Stage 3c Publication August 2016 More detailed dates and milestones will be maintained in a separate project plan on the CDISC portal. 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 4 of 6

1.9. Complexity Assessment: (Gaps, Risks, Complexities and Challenges) Major potential risks: For this project to succeed, assigned resources must continue be made available to work on project deliverables. It is critical that personnel assigned are able to prioritize the project above other responsibilities regardless of the organization providing the resource. In order to provide the required deliverables within the agreed timeframe in the FDA Grant Award, this project will rely on close collaboration with the SHARE team. Project Complexity: Medium Complexity based on initial assessment of the Prostate Cancer concepts and experience with the first oncology Indication (Breast Cancer) most development will be focused on Non-standard variables to support existing domains and variables, as well as development of controlled terminology. Significant Project Challenges: Prostate Cancer will be the first TA to incorporate the SHARE ecosystem and SHARE team into the development process there will be additional focus on the TAUG development process as the CFAST team and the SHARE team will develop a template process for future TAUG s to follow. 1.10. Project Document Repository Project documents will be maintained in the CDISC portal under Teams Projects > Therapeutic Disease Specialty > Prostate Cancer and will be accessible to all team members. 1.11. Plans for Future Versions Biomedical Concepts will be developed for Lab Tests, Pathology Tests and QRS Instruments. These will be prioritized in order of importance and may result in additional development work being performed for later versions of the TAUG. This is dependent on time and resource availability. 2. Resources 2.1. Team Members Project Team members fall into five roles with different responsibilities. Members in project level roles are recruited for the particular therapeutic area project. Not listed below are program level resources that support all TA projects. Reviewers are not listed as these evolve over the life of the project. Active Team Members by Role Number of Participants Project Manager (1 CFAST 1 SHARE) 2 Clinical Therapeutic Area Experts 2 Medical Writer 1 Statisticians 8 Metadata Developers 6 CDASH Representatives 2 ADaM Representatives 3 SDS Representatives 3 SHARE Representatives 5 Terminology/Clinical Outcome Assessments Representatives 3 Total 35 Team members currently identified are listed in a separate spreadsheet to accommodate changes over time. The Prostate Cancer team member list will be maintained in the project document repository. 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 5 of 6

2.2. Key Sponsors and Participants Current key participants are shown below. The project also intends to invite participation of relevant medical associations. Other key participants will be added as they are identified. Stakeholder/Participant CFAST Therapeutic Area Standards Steering Committee CDISC C-Path TransCelerate BioPharma US Food and Drug Administration US National Cancer Institute - Enterprise Vocabulary Service CDISC Teams: CDASH, SDS, Terminology, ADaM and SHARE teams BRIDG Semantic Coordination Committee Role Program governance and resource allocation. Program and project managment, team members and expert consultants (includes both CDISC employees and volunteers). Program and project managment, team members and expert consultants Provides project management, clinical expertise, team members and reviewers Performs review of draft and final documents to ensure data points meet FDA reviewer needs. Provides team members and consultants to support controlled terminology development. Project liaisons to support the TA standards development resources. If new semantics are needed, the BRIDG SCC will be consulted and will assess if and how new sematics will be incorporated in the model. 2.3. Literature Review and References (Example: References consulted include relevant NIH, FDA and EMEA guidance, literature and CDEs. A complete list of relevant guidance, articles and publications for this indication can be found on the CDISC team portals.) 3. Relevant Project Documents Related documents to this Prostate Cancer Project Charter are: Prostate Cancer Team Member List (to be updated as required throughout the project) Prostate Cancer Concept Listing Spreadsheet Prostate Cancer Scoping & Planning Checklist Prostate Cancer Project Plan (Note that a complete CFAST/SHARE joint project plan is still under development to be used as a template for future TAUG developments) 4. Date of TAPSC Approval: 25 th February 2016 2015 Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium, Inc. All rights reserved Page 6 of 6