Phase 1b KEYNOTE-200 (STORM):

Similar documents
Disclosures Information Brendan D. Curti, MD

Poster No: 319. Dr Nicola Annels University of Surrey, UK

At the forefront of cancer immunotherapy. Investor Presentation January 2018

Oncolytic Immunotherapies for Difficult-to-Treat Cancers. Annual General Meeting 23 rd November 2016

Coxsackievirus A21: The basic facts

Coxsackievirus A21 as an oncolytic agent for the control of human cancer

For personal use only. General Meeting 6 March 2014

Providence Cancer Center, Portland, OR; 2 Oncology Specialists, Chicago, IL; 3 John Wayne Cancer InsPtute, Santa Monica, CA; 4

Immune checkpoint blockade in lung cancer

Immunotherapy for Breast Cancer. Aurelio B. Castrellon Medical Oncology Memorial Healthcare System

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

At the forefront of cancer immunotherapy. Investor Presentation January 2018

B. G. Redman University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI. J. A. Thompson University of Washington, Seattle, WA

2019 ASCO-SITC. Nektar Therapeutics Investor & Analyst Call. March 1, 2019

For personal use only

Checkpoint-Inhibitoren beim Lungenkarzinom. Dr. Helge Bischoff Thoraxklinik Heidelberg

Oncolytic Viruses: Reovirus

Presenter Disclosure Information

New Biological and Immunological Therapies for Cancer

PTAC meeting held on 5 & 6 May (minutes for web publishing)

Pembrolizumab for Patients With PD-L1 Positive Advanced Carcinoid or Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From the KEYNOTE-028 Study

Cancer Immunotherapy Patient Forum. for the Treatment of Melanoma, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Lung and Genitourinary Cancers - November 7, 2015

CANCER IMMUNOTHERAPY Presented by John A Keech Jr DO MultiCare Regional Cancer Center

Novel RCC Targets from Immuno-Oncology and Antibody-Drug Conjugates

DCC-2618, a novel pan-kit and PDGFR

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Robert F. Taylor, MD Aurora Health Care

Synopsis (C1034T02) CNTO 95 Module 5.3 Clinical Study Report C1034T02

KEYNOTE 695: TAVO Phase 2b Melanoma Trial Preliminary Data for SITC November 6, 2018

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

Lung Cancer Case. Since the patient was symptomatic, a targeted panel was sent. ALK FISH returned in 2 days and was positive.

Immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Highlights from AACR 2015: The Emerging Potential of Immunotherapeutic Approaches in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Combination Immunotherapy Approaches Chemotherapy, Radiation Therapy, and Dual Checkpoint Therapy

Developping the next generation of studies in RCC

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

ONCOS-102 in melanoma Dr. Alexander Shoushtari. 4. ONCOS-102 in mesothelioma 5. Summary & closing

Two roads for oncolytic immunotherapy development

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Lung Cancer William N. William Jr.

Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Combination Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Checkpoint Inibitors for Bladder Cancer

News from ASCO. Niven Mehra, Medical Oncologist. Radboud UMC Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital

Management of Incurable Prostate Cancer in 2014

INMUNOTERAPIA I. Dra. Virginia Calvo

Phase 1 Trial of ALN-VSP in Cancers Involving the Liver. Annual Meeting of the Controlled Release Society August 2, 2011

Conversations in Oncology. November Kerry Hotel Pudong, Shanghai China

Phase 1 Study Combining Anti-PD-L1 (MEDI4736) With BRAF (Dabrafenib) and/or MEK (Trametinib) Inhibitors in Advanced Melanoma

Releasing the Brakes on Tumor Immunity: Immune Checkpoint Blockade Strategies

Checkpoint regulators a new class of cancer immunotherapeutics. Dr Oliver Klein Medical Oncologist ONJCC Austin Health

Reflex Testing Guidelines for Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

NSCLC: immunotherapy as a first-line treatment. Paolo Bironzo Oncologia Polmonare AOU S. Luigi Gonzaga Orbassano (To)

Phase I Study of Carfilzomib and Panobinostat for Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Myeloma: A Multicenter MMRC Clinical Trial

Predictive Biomarkers for Pembrolizumab. Eric H. Rubin, M.D.

May 31, NCCN Guidelines: T-Cell Lymphomas

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Is Prostate Cancer Amenable to Immunotherapy Approaches? New Frontiers in Urologic Oncology, September 12, 2015

GSK Oncology. Axel Hoos, MD, PhD Senior Vice President, Oncology R&D. March 8, 2017

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer

Encouraging activity of novel pan-kit and PDGFRα inhibitor DCC-2618 in patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Nivolumab: esperienze italiane nel carcinoma polmonare avanzato

ICONIC: Biologic and clinical activity of first in class ICOS agonist antibody JTX /- nivolumab (nivo) in patients with advanced cancers

Media Release. Basel, 21 July 2017

Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancers. Barbara Burtness, MD Yale University

Options for first-line cisplatin-eligible patients

Developmental Therapeutics for Genitourinary Malignancies

Checkpoint Regulators Cancer Immunotherapy takes centre stage. Dr Oliver Klein Department of Medical Oncology 02 May 2015

II sessione. Immunoterapia oltre la prima linea. Alessandro Tuzi ASST Sette Laghi, Varese

Lung Cancer Immunotherapy

ALK positive Lung Cancer. Shirish M. Gadgeel, MD. Director of the Thoracic Oncology program University of Michigan

Study No Title : Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

Update on new agents in Gastrointestinal Tumor (GIST)

Evan J. Lipson, M.D.

Jefferies 2018 Healthcare Conference. June 6, 2018

Supplementary Online Content

Immunotherapy in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma: Where Do We Stand? Sanjiv S. Agarwala, MD St. Luke s Cancer Center Bethlehem, Pennsylvania

Cancer Immunotherapy Survey

Title A Phase II study of oral LBH589 in adult patients with refractory cutaneous T-Cell lymphoma

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT Adi Diab 1, Nizar Tannir 1, Daniel Cho

Immunotherapy, an exciting era!!

IMMUNOTHERAPY IN THE TREATMENT OF CERVIX CANCER

Novel EGFR TKI Theliatinib: An Open Label, Dose Escalation Phase I Clinical Trial

Professor Mark Bower Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London

IMMUNE CHECKPOINT THERAPY FOR GENITOURINARY CANCERS: KIDNEY CANCER AND TRANSITIONAL CELL CARCINOMA

patients who have received multiple lines of prior chemotherapy including a platinum-containing regimen patients without formal measurable disease

Constan'ne S Tam Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Center Melbourne, Australia

Corporate Presentation: Jefferies Global Healthcare Conference June 7, 2018

CONSIDERATIONS IN DEVELOPMENT OF PEMBROLIZUMAB IN MSI-H CANCERS

Practice changing studies in lung cancer 2017

Immuno-Oncology. Axel Hoos, MD, PhD Senior Vice President, Oncology R&D. February 24, 2016

Bank of America Merrill Lynch 2018 Health Care Conference. Reinventing Therapeutic Antibodies for the Treatment of Cancer

Immunotherapy in the Adjuvant Setting for Melanoma: What You Need to Know

Study No.: Title: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

Updates in Immunotherapy for Urothelial Carcinoma

This clinical study synopsis is provided in line with Boehringer Ingelheim s Policy on Transparency and Publication of Clinical Study Data.

Future Therapeutic Developments in Head and Neck Cancer

LIGAND-INDUCIBLE, PROSTATE STEM CELL ANTIGEN (PSCA)-DIRECTED GoCAR-T CELLS IN ADVANCED SOLID TUMORS: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM A DOSE ESCALATION STUDY

Developing Novel Immunotherapeutic Cancer Treatments for Clinical Use

Presenter Disclosure Information

African American Men and Prostate Cancer Management Option for Clinical PROSPECT Trial Participation in an Immunotherapy Study

Transcription:

Phase 1b KEYNOTE-2 (STORM): A study of an intravenously delivered oncolytic virus, Coxsackievirus A21 in combination with pembrolizumab in advanced cancer patients Hardev S. Pandha 1, Kevin J. Harrington 2, Christy Ralph 3, Alan Melcher 2, Brendan Curti 4, Rachel Sanborn 4, Charles Rudin 5, Jonathan Rosenberg 5, Sumati Gupta 6, Wallace Akerly 6, Emmett Schmidt 7, David Kaufman 7, Mark Grose 8, Bronwyn Davies 8, Roberta Karpathy 8, Darren Shafren 8 1

I have the following financial relationships to disclose: Consultant: Abbvie, BMS, Celgene, G1 Therapeutics, Novartis Scientific advisory board: Harpoon Therapeutics I will discuss the following off label use and/or investigational use in my presentation: CVA21 2

Cytoplasmic replication of CVA21 in non-muscle invasive bladder cancer 3

Implant human SK-Mel 28 Treatment CAVATAK or saline Sacrifice mice and excise tumor Day Day 14 3h 6h 24h 72h x Tumor gene profiling SCID Balb/C CAVATAK or saline IV (tail vein) Excise tumor for viral and cellular gene profiling 4

γ Saline Tumor gene expression CVA-21 Tumor CVA21 replication 15 Saline-CXCL1 15 CAVATAK-CXCL1 TCID 5 equivalent/mg tumor 1 7 1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 CXCL1 Normalised gene-fold changes 12 9 6 3 2. 3h 6h 24h 72h Time post-saline administration (h) Saline-PD-L1 Normalised gene-fold changes 12 9 6 3 2. 3h 6h 24h 72h Hours post-cavatak administration CAVATAK-PD-L1 1 2 4 6 8 Time post-cavatak administration (h) PD-L1 Normalised gene-fold changes 1.5 1..5 Normalised gene-fold changes 1.5 1..5. 3h 6h 24h 72h Time post-saline administration (h). 3h 6h 24h 72h Time post-cavatak administration (h) 5

6

Tail vein injection 3LL-hICAM-1 cells Treatment iv CVA21 or saline + ip anti-pd-1 or control mab Observation: Sacrifice 2% weight loss or labored breathing Day 7 1 13 16 3LL-hICAM-1 cells (i.v tail vein) CVA21 anti-pd-1 mab * 3LL-ICAM-1 cells are murine NSCLC 3LL cells stably transfected to express human ICAM-1 to allow CAVATAK binding and cell infection 7

Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis* Control Ab + Saline Control Ab + CVA21 Control Ab + Saline anti-m-pd-1 + Saline anti-m-pd-1 + Saline anti-m-pd-1 + CVA21 1 1 1 Percent survival 5 Percent survival 5 Percent survival 5 P = NS 5 1 15 2 25 Days ** P =.33 1 2 3 Days *P =.21 1 2 3 Days *n=1, sacrifice 2% weight loss or labored breathing 8

Part A / CVA21 Part B / CVA21 + pembrolizumab (Monotherapy) (Combination) Advanced melanoma, prostate, NSCLC or bladder cancer, sero-negative CVA21 days 1,3,5,22,43,64,85,16,127,148 Cohort 1 1 x1 8 TCID 5 n=3 Cohort 2 3 x 1 8 TCID 5 n=3 Cohort 3 1 x 1 9 TCID 5 Mandatory lesion biopsy (Day 8) Melanoma, NSCLC, Bladder And Prostate cancer n=3 each No DLT s CVA21 days 1,3,5,8,29,5,71,92,113,134,155 + pembrolizumab (2mg) every 3 weeks starting Day 8 Cohort Expansion NSCLC (~n=4) CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort 1 (n= 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (1 x1 8 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort 2 (n = 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (3 x1 8 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort 3 (n = 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort Expansion Bladder CA (~n=4) CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab 9

Part A: Histologically-confirmed (1) NSCLC, (2) bladder cancer, (3) castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) which are metastatic, or (4) Stage IIIC or Stage IV melanoma. Part B: Histologically or cytologically-confirmed advanced (1) NSCLC, (2) urothelial carcinoma. Part A: All subjects in Cohort 3 or P2D cohort must have a lesion accessible for FNA or core biopsy or open biopsy on Day 8 of the first treatment cycle. Part B: All subjects in Cohort 3 or P2D cohort must have either archival tissue available or a lesion accessible for mandatory core biopsy or open biopsy prior to treatment. Day 15 biopsy is requested but optional ECOG Performance Scale -1 Part B (Part A: -2). Life expectancy >3 months. Measureable disease based on RECIST 1.1. 1

Primary Objectives Part A To determine if CVA21 given intravenously is capable of tracking to malignant tumors. To establish a safe dose schedule of CVA21 for subsequent Phase 2 clinical trials. To describe the safety profile for intravenously-administered CVA21. Part B To assess and describe the safety profile of intravenous CVA21 and intravenous pembrolizumab in solid tumors of metastatic bladder cancer and NSCLC. To assess efficacy of the combination of CVA21 and intravenous pembrolizumab. in solid tumors of metastatic bladder cancer and NSCLC. 11

N=18 Related to CVA21 n (%) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4-5 Total Fatigue 3 (17%) 2 (11%) 5 (28%) Pyrexia 4 (22%) 1 (6%) 5 (28%) Flu-like illness 2 (11%) 1 (6%) 3 (17%) Lethargy 3 (17%) 3 (17%) Headache 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Abdominal distension 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Diarrhea 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Nasopharyngitis 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Arthralgia 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Myalgia 1 (6%) 1 (6%) Dry skin 1 (6%) 1 (6%) 12

1 8 AUC 48 hours post-infusion (CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum) 1 7 1 6 1 5 Cohort 1: Cohort 2: Cohort 3: 1 8 TCID 5 3x1 8 TCID 5 1 9 TCID 5 *Area under the curve (AUC) exposure over 48hr following the first infusion of CVA21 13

1 6 1 5 1 4 1 3 Prostate cancer Melanoma NSCLC Bladder cancer CVA21 RNA copies/mg tumour RNA 1-5 1-6 3-5 2-5 3-6 2-7 1-1 3-12 1-11 1-9 Patient Number Limit of detection (15 copies/mg RNA) Bone Bone Lymph Node Abdominal Wall Soft tissue, chest Chest Wall Lung iliac node Thigh Liver *Day 8 biopsy from Cohort 3 patients administered three infusions of 1 9 TCID 5 of CVA21 14

Control Anti-enteroviral protein Pt 2-5 (IVM1c) Nucleus Cytoplasmic CVA21 viral proteins Pt 3-6 (IVM1c) *Day 8 biopsy from Cohort 3 patients administered three infusions of 1 9 TCID 5 of CVA21 15

Best percentage change in the target lesions sum of diameters relative to baseline 1 75 5 25-25 -5 Melanoma Castrate-resistant prostate cancer NSCLC Metastatic bladder cancer PD SD PR *irrecist criteria: Preliminary data, investigator assessed + First response assessment at Day 42 16

17 3-1 NSCLC 3-2 Melanoma 2-1 Bladder CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 2 15 1 5 Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 8 6 4 2 Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 2 15 1 5 Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 6 4 2 1-1 Prostate Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 6 4 2 2-3 NSCLC Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 3 2 1 2-2 Bladder Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 4 3 2 1 1-9 Bladder Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 8 6 4 2 1-6 Prostate Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 CVA21 RNA copies/ml serum 5 4 3 2 1 3-6 Melanoma Secondary viral replication Post -infusion viral load 48h post-infusion #1 48h post-infusion #2 72h post-infusion #3 17

Single IV dose (Phase 1) Multi IV dose (KEYNOTE 2) Anti-CAVATAK neutralising antibody titre 65536 16384 496 124 256 64 16 4 CVA21 infusion Pt 24 Pt15 Pt26 Pt16 1.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Pos/Neg Cut-off Anti-CAVATAK neutralising antibody titre 65536 16384 496 124 256 64 16 4 3-1 3-2 2-1 2-2 2-3 1-1 1 CVA21 infusions 1.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Days post-cavatak infusion Days post-cavatak infusion 18

Enrolment complete IV delivery of CVA21 was generally well tolerated no grade 3 or 4 related AE s with a median of 6 CVA21 infusions per patient no dose-limiting toxicities CVA21 tumor targeting in patients with melanoma, NSCLC and bladder cancer patients in Cohort 3 was confirmed detection of CVA21 viral RNA in tumor biopsies at study day 8 viral replication by IHC in melanoma tumor biopsies Of the 15 patients from Cohorts 1-3 eligible for investigator best overall response assessment, 1 PR, 1 SD and 4 PD were observed Serum viral loads suggest potential secondary viral replication events 19

IV CVA21 days 1,3,5,8,29,5,71,92,113,134,155 + IV pembrolizumab (2mg) every 3 weeks starting Day 8 Cohort 1 (n= 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (1 x1 8 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort 2 (n = 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (3 x1 8 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Recruitment complete Recruitment complete Cohort 3 (n= 3) NSCLC or bladder cancer CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Recruitment complete No DLT s Cohort Expansion NSCLC (~n=4 +/- prior checkpoint) CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab Cohort Expansion Bladder CA (~n=4 +/- prior checkpoint) CVA21 (1 x1 9 TCID 5 ) + pembrolizumab 2

N=1 Related to CVA21 n(%) Related to Pembrolizumab n(%) Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4-5 Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4-5 No DLT s reported Fatigue 3 (3%) 2 (2%) Nausea 2 (2%) 1 (1%) 1 (1%) Pyrexia 3 (3%) 1 (1%) Myalgia 2 (2%) Headache 2 (2%) Hypotension 1 (1%) 1 (1%) Diarrhea 1 (1%) 1 (1%) Dizziness 2 (2%) Vomiting 1 (1%) 1 (1%) Constipation 1 (1%) Chills 1 (1%) Hyponatremia 1 (1%) Flu-like illness 1 (1%) Malaise 1 (1%) 21

Cohort CVA21 Dose (TCID5) 1 1 x 1 8 2 3 x 1 8 Patient No. Tumor Type 121 NSCLC 67 M 151 Bladder 73 M Age Gender Prior Therapy Response (Day)* surgery (2), chemotherapy (5), radiotherapy surgery (11), chemotherapy (2), radiotherapy (2) CVA21 Doses Pembrolizumab Doses PD (Day 114) 8 5 PD (Day 118) 9 6 152 Bladder 58 M surgery (3), chemotherapy (2) PD (Day 83) 7 4 153 NSCLC 62 M 154 Bladder 68 F surgery, chemotherapy (2), radiotherapy surgery (4), chemotherapy (2), immunotherapy (BCG, atezolizumab), other 122 NSCLC 76 F chemotherapy (2), radiotherapy 132 Bladder 8 M 3 1 x 1 9 123 NSCLC 66 M surgery (13), radiotherapy, chemotherapy (5), immunotherapy (BCG, atezolizumab) chemotherapy (2), radiotherapy (2), immunotherapy (anti-b7h3, anti- PDL1, ipilimumab, nivolumab) PD (Day 92) ** 7 4 Withdrawn due to unrelated grade 3 sepsis (Day 19) Withdrew consent (Day 25) 4 1 3 1 PD (Day 29) 4 2 ongoing (Day 44) 5 2 155 NSCLC 81 M chemotherapy, immunotherapy (nivolumab) ongoing (Day 21) 4 1 156 Bladder 61 M chemotherapy, surgery (2) ongoing (Day 15) 4 1 *First response assessment at Day 92; **Clinical progression only 22

Reciprocal Log 1 anti-cva21 neutralising antibody titer 2 2 Part A: CVA21 2 15 2 1 2 5 Pos/Neg cut-off 2.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Reciprocal Log 1 anti-cva21 neutralising antibody titer 2 2 2 15 2 1 2 5 Part B: CVA21+ pembrolizumab + pembrolizumab Pos/Neg cut-off 2.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 Study Days Study Days 23

Enrollment in Part A (monotherapy) is complete with no DLTs observed Successful systemic CVA21 tumor targeting and findings of potential secondary CVA21 replication (Part A) Evidence of tumor stabilization and response (Part A) At present, the combination of intravenous CVA21 and pembrolizumab (Part B) has been generally well-tolerated in heavily pre-treated patients with or without prior immune checkpoint therapy Enrollment in Part B (combination) Cohorts 1,2 and 3 complete. Expansion cohort currently recruiting One grade 3 CVA21-related hyponatremia with no DLT for the combination of CVA21 and pembrolizumab Comparable host anti-cva21 immune responses in the presence or absence of pembrolizumab Intravenous delivery of CVA21 is able to target metastatic lesions with the potential to upregulate PD-L1 expression during the viral replication process 24

The investigators, patients, and study staff who are contributing to this study; Viralytics R&D and clinical teams Support for this study was provided by Viralytics Ltd. Merck & Co. 25