NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

Similar documents
Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

Community-based sanctions


SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK. Calhoun and Cleburne Counties

Berks County Treatment Courts

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

The New Face of Monroe County Community Supervision

In January 2016, and in response to the Opiate Epidemic, Henrico County Sheriff, Michael

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE TREATMENT COURT BJ Jones Chief Judge and Treatment Court Judge. Who are the Oyate?

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator

Participants Handbook Revised July 2016

Findings from the NIJ Tribal Wellness Court Study: 68 Key Component #8

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES:

CHAPTER 1 An Evidence-Based Approach to Corrections

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

The 5 Obstacles to Alcohol Monitoring:

Doing Time or Doing Treatment: Moving Beyond Program Phases to Real Lasting Change

THE ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND BENEFITS OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT PROGRAMS IN GEORGIA EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

Welcome to. St. Louis County Adult. Drug Court. This Handbook is designed to:

Handbook for Drug Court Participants

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)

A Dose of Evaluation:

FAYETTE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS UNIONTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA ADULT DRUG COURT SENIOR JUDGE GERALD SOLOMON

The Cost of Imprisonment

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS

DRUG POLICY TASK FORCE

Polk County Problem Solving Courts

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520)

DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK NAVAJO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT HOLBROOK, ARIZONA

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT: TACKLING MENTAL HEALTH FROM THE INSIDE OUT

Smart on Crime, Smart on Drugs

Live Free...Drug Free Tools for Hope

Second Judicial District Court Specialty Courts

TREMPEALEAU COUNTY RECOVERY COURT PROGRAM PARTICIPANT S HANDBOOK

Peter Weir, Executive Director of the Department of Public Safety, Chair of the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice

Drug Court Administrator M. Keithley Williams (telephone) (fax)

ADULT DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Middlesex Sheriff s Office NCSL Atlantic States Fiscal Leaders Meeting Presentation

Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970

An Overview of Risk-Needs- Responsivity Model: Application to Behavioral Health Populations

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

Corrections, Public Safety and Policing

SIGNATURE OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR OR CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview

Eric L. Sevigny, University of South Carolina Harold A. Pollack, University of Chicago Peter Reuter, University of Maryland

Welcome to the Wood Pilot Project

Greg's Place - Application

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS:

Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Grant to partially fund a Sober 24 program in Carson City from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Comparative Analysis of Drug Courts: Effectiveness of Sentencing an Offender to Treatment and Rehabilitation. Marissa Hundelt

Colorado Statewide DWI and Drug Court Process Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

Allegheny County Justice Related Services for Individuals with Mental Illness:

MORE TREATMENT, BETTER TREATMENT AND THE RIGHT TREATMENT

Restructuring Proposal for the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAM

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

Assessing Risk. October 22, Tammy Meredith, Ph.D. Applied Research Services, Inc.

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

NEW MEXICO DRUG/DWI COURT Peer Review Summary Report

Sex Offender Management in Your Jurisdiction: Self- Assessment Scorecard PART A: SPECIALIZED ASSESSMENTS/EVALUATIONS IN MY JURISDICTION.

Strafford County Drug Treatment Court: Final Performance Evaluation

Criminal Justice in Arizona

Presentation by the Alaska Mental Health Board and Advisory Board on Alcoholism and Drug Abuse to the Alaska Mental Health Trust Authority November

Gearing Up Against Substance Abuse

Florida Adult Felony Drug Courts Evaluation Report

Overcoming Perceived Pitfalls of DWI Courts

Success in Drug Offenders in Rehabilitation Programs. Austin Nichols CJUS 4901 FALL 2012

C U YA H O G A C O U N T Y

Participant Handbook. Billings Adult Misdemeanor Treatment Court

in Indiana Detailed Analysis

Laramie County Drug Court & Laramie County DUI Court Recidivism Study and Program Evaluation Part II. (July 1, 2012 to July 1, 2015)

Advisory Commission on the Administration of Justice. Justice Reinvestment Presentation #1 September 12, 2018

Syracuse Community Treatment Court. Handbook for Participants. Guidelines and Program Information

Criminal Justice in Arizona

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY E.G., COMPETENCE TO STAND TRIAL CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION INSANITY IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

VET COURT PROGRAM PARTICIPANT MANUAL. Updated 2015

Nature of Risk and/or Needs Assessment

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

Felony Drug Court Participant Overview

E-Career Counseling for Offender Re-entry

Adult Drug Courts All Rise

Guadalupe County Veterans Treatment Court Participant s Handbook Updated: October 18, 2016

Implementing Evidence-based Practices in a Louisiana Juvenile Drug Court

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

Transcription:

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT An Overview

THE TEAM: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH The Northampton County Drug Court Team consists of: Judge County Division of Drug and Alcohol County Division of Mental Health County Adult Probation County Public Defenders Office Area Outpatient Service Providers (evaluation, rehabilitation, and support) Ancillary Supports (County Prison Officials, County Department of Children, Youth and Families)

THE PROBLEM SOLVING COURT PHILOSOPHY: RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Addresses the root of an offender s criminogenic behavior Prospective: focused on individual outcomes rather than the crime Less adversarial than traditional courts Collaborative team approach Community-based Treatment driven

THE WORK OF THE DRUG AND MENTAL HEALTH COURT TEAMS Evaluating candidates and admissions determination Monitoring participant progress through information obtained by contacts with service providers, the Probation Department, Drug & Alcohol and Mental Health case management Identifying resources to meet the treatment and ancillary needs of participants Encouraging participants development and exercise of positive coping mechanisms and daily living skills by the application of incentives Determining the need for and applying sanctions to deter participants unhealthy behavior Educating the community at large about the drug epidemic and mental illness, and the work of the Courts To raise awareness and support and to reduce stigma

THE BENEFITS OF DRUG COURT To participants: Participants are working, going to school, raising their children, and working on their recovery in their communities, where the skills they learn are immediately applicable to their everyday lives. To participating offices and agencies: The Court and human service providers have gained a greater understanding of the systems and resources that each has in place, and where there was previously no collaboration between the different entities, Drug Court has brought us together to provide better opportunities and outcomes for those involved in the criminal justice system. To the community: The community realizes a direct and indirect cost savings by a reduction in the actual costs of incarceration and the return of people to the community to work and raise their families.

PROGRAM TRACKS Track One: Post-conviction court open to eligible parole and probation violators as an alternative to incarceration A probationary sentence that includes completion of Drug Court is imposed, no incarceration 4-phase program designed to last 18 to 24 months Track Two: Direct sentence program open to eligible offenders at time of sentencing through TCAP

DRUG COURT ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Individuals 18 years of age or older who: Reside in Northampton County; Have committed a Felony 3, Misdemeanor 1 or Misdemeanor 2 offense and have not less than 12 months sentencing exposure; Have a qualifying substance use disorder; Have no mental illness that would interfere with treatment and supervision; Have no convictions for murder, manslaughter, felony sex offenses, violent felony offenses, violent offenses committed with a firearm, or unresolved outof-county charges.

SCREENING PROCESS Step 1: Application Review (including demographic information, addiction history, criminal history, military history if any) Step 2: Drug and Alcohol Evaluation Step 3: Review of Any Supervision History Step 4: Team Discussion Step 5: (optional) Applicant observation of Reinforcement Hearing, appearance before court Step 6: Team Decision

PROGRAM FEATURES: SUPERVISION Phase One: Phase Two: Phase Three: Phase Four: Electronic monitoring Curfew Weekly Reinforcement Hearings Weekly contact with SPO Weekly contact with SPO Weekly Reinforcement Hearings Drug testing twice per week Weekly contact with SPO Bi-weekly Reinforcement Hearings Drug testing twice per week Bi-weekly contact with SPO Monthly Reinforcement Hearings Drug testing twice per week Drug testing twice per week

PROGRAM FEATURES: PARTICIPANT PROGRESS Phase One: Phase Two: Phase Three: Phase Four: Obtain daily self-help meetings Attend self-help meetings as directed Attend self-help meetings as directed Attend self-help meetings as directed Obtain temporary sponsor Obtain stable, sober housing 30 consecutive days sober in community Select sponsor and home group Obtain employment or enroll in school (FT/PT combined) 60 consecutive days sober in community Begin paying costs and fines Maintain work/school Maintain/obtain independent sober housing 90 consecutive days sober in community Continue paying costs and fines Maintain work/school Maintain housing Obtain GED (if applicable and not previously obtained) Pay off or continue making consistent payments on costs and fines

PHASE ADVANCEMENT AND GRADUATION Phase Advancement Requirements: Complete a Phase Advancement Application identifying progress, barriers to progress and needs Write and read an essay in open court on a designated recovery topic Have met all the requirements of the phase Graduation Requirements: Successfully complete all recommended treatment Attain a minimum of 9 months sobriety in the community Maintain gainful, consistent employment, or vocational or academic program Maintain clean, sober, stable home Complete payment of costs and fines or have payment plan in place Present Graduation Project in Court

THE BENEFITS OF DRUG COURT Reduction in Recidivism Rates According to the National Association of Drug Court Professionals: The 1-year recidivism rate for Drug Court graduates is only 16%, and the 2-year rate is only 27% By comparison, the national recidivism rate among imprisoned drug users is 60-80% nationwide Better Individual and Community Outcomes Drug Court participants are six times more likely than others to succeed in drug treatment Reduction in Costs to the County Based on the prison s current per diem and an average six month sentence for a level 2-4 offender, Drug Court results in a savings of $17,906.40 per participant Drug Court has saved approximately 4,138 prison days, resulting in an estimated cost savings of $423,386.88 Criminal Division has collected over $17,813.15 on all cases under the supervision of the Drug Court