WHI Memory Study (WHIMS) Investigator Data Release Data Preparation Guide April 2014

Similar documents
WHI Memory Study (WHIMS) Investigator Data Release Data Preparation Guide December 2012

UDS version 3 Summary of major changes to UDS form packets

Test Assessment Description Ref. Global Deterioration Rating Scale Dementia severity Rating scale of dementia stages (2) (4) delayed recognition

NEUROPSYCHOMETRIC TESTS

NO LOWER COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING IN OLDER ADULTS WITH ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER

ARIC V6 NCS Codebook I, S.3. Section 3: V6 / NCS Forms

CHAPTER 5 NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL PROFILE OF ALZHEIMER S DISEASE

The Use of Brief Assessment Batteries in Multiple Sclerosis. History of Cognitive Studies in MS

Supplementary Online Content

Neuropsychological Correlates of Performance Based Functional Status in Elder Adult Protective Services Referrals for Capacity Assessments

Exploration of a weighed cognitive composite score for measuring decline in amnestic MCI

Korean-VCI Harmonization Standardization- Neuropsychology Protocol (K-VCIHS-NP)

Neuropsychological Evaluation of

Trail making test A 2,3. Memory Logical memory Story A delayed recall 4,5. Rey auditory verbal learning test (RAVLT) 2,6

AD Prevention Trials: An Industry Perspective

Overview. Case #1 4/20/2012. Neuropsychological assessment of older adults: what, when and why?

LIFE expectancy at older ages has been increasing, and

Jung Wan Kim* Department of Speech Pathology of Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea

Process of a neuropsychological assessment

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Neuroscience INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL DOMAIN-SPECIFIC COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN PATIENTS WITH COPD AND CONTROL SUBJECTS

Equating UDS Neuropsychological Tests: 3.0>2.0, 3.0=2.0, 3.0<2.0? Dan Mungas, Ph.D. University of California, Davis

Neuropsychological Performance in Cannabis Users and Non-Users Following Motivation Manipulation

Vaitsa Giannouli Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Bulgaria Nikolaos Syrmos Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece

PPMI Cognitive-Behavioral Working Group. Daniel Weintraub, MD

Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) Study Protocol Summary

Malaysian Healthy Ageing Society

Department of Psychology, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea

DOES IMPAIRED EXECUTIVE FUNCTIONING DIFFERENTIALLY IMPACT VERBAL MEMORY MEASURES IN OLDER ADULTS WITH SUSPECTED DEMENTIA?

January 18 th, 2018 Brixen, Italy

PRELIMINARY NORMS FOR YEAR OLDS ON THE MEMORY TEST FOR OLDER ADULTS (MTOA:S) ABSTRACT

David A Scott Lis Evered. Department of Anaesthesia and Acute Pain Medicine St Vincent s Hospital, Melbourne University of Melbourne

Recognizing Dementia can be Tricky

Physical performance and cognition in older adults with and without dementia Blankevoort, Gerwin

CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY PSYC32

Clinical Study Depressive Symptom Clusters and Neuropsychological Performance in Mild Alzheimer s and Cognitively Normal Elderly

EARLY ONSET FRONTOTERMPORAL DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMERS DISEASE: DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT AND CARE

Hospice Care in a Cohort of Elders with Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment

APPENDIX A TASK DEVELOPMENT AND NORMATIVE DATA

M P---- Ph.D. Clinical Psychologist / Neuropsychologist

Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised: Norms for Elderly African Americans

Cognitive Screening in Risk Assessment. Geoffrey Tremont, Ph.D. Rhode Island Hospital & Alpert Medical School of Brown University.

Migrating from UDS 2.0 to UDS 3.0: Modern psychometric methods. Paul K. Crane, MD MPH Department of Medicine University of Washington

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Overview for Best Practice in Stroke and Complex Neurological Conditions March 2013

Assessment of People with Early Dementia and their Families

Client/Testing Information

Service Related Project. Kimberley Keegan

21/05/2018. Today s webinar will answer. Presented by: Valorie O Keefe Consultant Psychologist

Assessing cognitive function after stroke. Glyn Humphreys

Outline. Minority Issues in Aging Research. The Role of Research in the Clinical Setting. Why Participate in Research

Supplementary Online Content

Carmen Inoa Vazquez, Ph.D., ABPP Clinical Professor NYU School of Medicine Lead Litigation Conference Philadelphia May 19, 2009 Presentation

Masterthesis Memory profile in different subtypes of Alzheimer s disease based on patterns of regional brain atrophy

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER

Why Cognition Matters: Impact of Cognitive Impairment on Safety and Independent Living Skills

Cognitive stimulation therapy (CST): neuropsychological mechanisms of change

WHI - Volume 3, Form 6 - Final Eligibility Assessment (Ver. 4) Page 1. Completed by Clinical Center (CC) staff; 2-page form; key-entered at CC.

Non-motor subtypes of Early Parkinson Disease in the Parkinson s Progression Markers Initiative

February 8, Prepared By: Glen M. Doniger, PhD Director of Scientific Development NeuroTrax Corporation

C-MP4 in amci, AD and LBD

Frontotemporal dementia and neuropsychology: the value of missing values

California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute:

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT S A R A H R A S K I N, P H D, A B P P S A R A H B U L L A R D, P H D, A B P P

High-dose antioxidant supplements and cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly women 1 3

Meta-analyses of cognitive functioning in euthymic bipolar patients and their first-degree relatives

Relationship of Behavioral Compensation and Cognitive Reserve in Survivors of Primary Brain Tumors

The Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Scale

NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT

Recognition of Alzheimer s Disease: the 7 Minute Screen

Measurement and Classification of Neurocognitive Disability in HIV/AIDS Robert K. Heaton Ph.D University of California San Diego Ancient History

Psychometric properties and factor structure of an expanded CERAD neuropsychological battery in an elderly VA sample

The Cognitive Log (Cog-Log) & The Orientation Log (O-Log)

Alzheimer s disease dementia: a neuropsychological approach

E 2001/02 2B* 2002/03 N=3.107 N=2.545 N=2.076 N=1.691 N=1002 N=2.165 N=1.818 N= MMSE: n= MMSE: n=997. short. n=121.

EMPIRICAL ISSUES IN THE STUDY OF COGNITIVE AGING THROUGH POPULATION-BASED STUDIES

Monitoring Cognitive Functioning: National Survey of Midlife in the United States (MIDUS)

MOS SF-36 health survey (Ware &

Selection and Combination of Markers for Prediction

Neuropsychological Evaluations of Capacity STEVEN E. ROTHKE, PH.D., ABPP HAYLEY AMSBAUGH, M.S.

CRITICALLY APPRAISED PAPER (CAP)

SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL

A semantic verbal fluency test for English- and Spanish-speaking older Mexican-Americans

I IADL. See Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) Idiopathic rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (Idiopathic RBD), 136

THE LONG TERM PSYCHOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF DAILY SEDATIVE INTERRUPTION IN CRITICALLY ILL PATIENTS

Psychological factors that influence fall risk: implications for prevention


Can aspirin slow cognitive decline and the onset of dementia? The ASPREE study. Mark Nelson on behalf of ASPREE Investigators

SOCIABLE DELIVERABLE D7.2a Interim Assessment of the SOCIABLE Platform and Services

AMNESTIC MINIMAL COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT: BEYOND MEMORY

Detecting neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected youth: Are we focusing on the wrong factors?

FATIGUE. A brief guide to the PROMIS Fatigue instruments:

Classification of Persons by Dementia Status in the National Health and Aging Trends Study

Chapter 8. Patient Assessment and Eligibility for Services

Trial Description. PLEASE NOTE: This trial has been registered retrospectively. Title

Empire BlueCross BlueShield Professional Commercial Reimbursement Policy

The neuropsychological profiles of mild Alzheimer s disease and questionable dementia as compared to age-related cognitive decline

Investigations in Number, Data, and Space, Grade 1, 2nd Edition 2008 Correlated to: Washington Mathematics Standards for Grade 1

The Five-Point Test: Reliability, Validity and Normative Data for Children and Adults

Transcription:

WHI Memory Study (WHIMS) Investigator Data Release Data Preparation Guide April 2014 1. Introduction This release consists of a single data set from the WHIMS Epidemiology of Cognitive Health Outcomes (ECHO) study. The data provided are the results of the cognitive battery and information regarding the classification of cognitive status (details provided below) from 2008 through December 31, 2012. Note that the study is expected to continue through 2015. 2. Description of WHIMS ECHO Women who were previously enrolled in the WHIMS Extension were recruited for WHIMS ECHO beginning in 2008. Instead of face-to-face evaluation, participants undergo an annual centralized, validated cognitive telephone interview for tracking changes in cognitive status (Rapp et al., 2012). The interview is comprised of a neuropsychological battery including a global cognitive screener (modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status, known as the TICSm) and additional neuropsychological tests. All participants receive the entire battery (see below). If a woman scores below 31 on the TICSm, the Dementia Questionnaire (DQ) is administered to a friend or family member previously identified (proxy). The DQ is a standardized, validated instrument used to reliably classify dementia when used with cognitive performance measures. A central panel of experts in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment syndrome and dementia reviews the results along with the cognitive scoring history and classifies participants as follows: 1) no dementia (no cognitive impairment), 2) mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 3) probable dementia (PD), 4) unable to classify cognitive impairment, 5) unable to classify functional impairment, and 6) unable to classify no cognitive impairment and no DQ. Unable to classify designations are made when either key information is missing or factors affecting cognitive or behavioral function (e.g., depression, acute medical illness) are present and preclude a confident classification into one of the three main categories (No Dementia, MCI, Dementia). Unable to classify-cognitive impairment indicates that cognitive data are available and were judged to be impaired by but missing data (typically a missing Dementia Questionnaire) or confounding factors are present. Similarly, Unable to classify-functional impairment indicates that the DQ reflects significant functional impairment, but because some or all cognitive test data are missing. Unable to classify-no cognitive impairment and no DQ is made when cognitive impairment is not clearly evident and the DQ is missing. For analytical purposes this group can be considered Normal (No Dementia) since cognitive impairment is a requisite for MCI and Dementia. (NOTE: The California Verbal Learning Test, modified as described below, is not reviewed or considered when adjudicating cases). Page 1

3. Data File Setup The data file is a SAS data set with one or more observations per participant. The identifying variable in each file is Participant ID, ID (referred to as the common ID in the WHI documentation). Computed variables have also been included and are described in detail under the next section, contents of the cognitive battery. Refer to the Appendix for further details on the tests and questionnaires. 4. Contents of the Cognitive Battery Test/Scale Variable name Variable description score_01 to score_16 Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICS-m) score_01 score_02 score_03 score_04 score_05 to score_08 score_09 to score_10 score_11 to score_12 score_13 score_14 to score_15 score_16 Sub-scores for each of the 16 components Name and orientation (0 to 9) Counting backwards (0 to 2) Word list recall (0 to 10) Subtracting 7 from 100 by (0 to 5) Responsive naming (0 to 4) Repetition (0 to 2) Naming President and Vice-President of USA (0 to 4) Finger tapping (0 to 2) Word opposites (0 to 2) Delayed word list recall (0 to 10) tics_score TICS total score (0 to 50) East Boston Memory Test ebmt_score Total score (0 to 12) (EBMT) Verbal Fluency - Animals vfa_wordcount Total number named Oral Trail Making Test Part A and B oraltrail_errorsa, oraltrail_correcta, oraltrail_timea oraltrail_errorsb, oraltrail_correctb, oraltrail_timeb Total number of errors (0 to 5), total number correct (0 to 25), and total time(secs) for Part A* ( 300) Total number of errors (0 to 5), total number correct (0 to 25), and total time(secs) for Part B* ( 300) Digit Span Test digit_forwardscore Total score for digits forward (0 to 14) digit_backwardscore Total score for digits backward (0 to 14) Geriatric Depression Scale gds_score Total score (0 to 15) (GDS) WHI Insomnia Rating Scale insomnia Total score (0 to 20) Page 2

(WHIIRS) TICS Word List Long Delay ticslong_score Total score (0 to 10) EBMT Recall ebmtrecall_score Total score (0 to 12) California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) - modified cvlt_correct, cvlt_intrusions, cvlt_repetitions Total score (0 to 48) Number of intrusions Number of repetitions * Note that total time (secs) is a character variable; DC indicates that the test was discontinued before completion. 5. Data Conventions Dates No actual dates are included in the data files. All dates have been converted to the number of days since WHI randomization. A negative number of days indicate the date occurred before randomization. Likewise, a positive number indicates occurrence after randomization. Data Edits At data entry, the built-in features of the study database application prevented entry of most invalid or impossible data values for categorical variables. Broad range checks applied to continuous variables have set out-of-range responses to missing. There still may be values that appear extreme; it is up to the user to examine all data before proceeding with data analysis. Missing Data Missing data can result from a participant not completing all tests or assessments. Missing values in the data files are represented by a single period (. ) or blank ( ). 5. Appending and Merging Data Files If you wish to expand your data analyses to include WHI Clinical Trial data, you can use the ID variable in the WHIMS data set and the ID variable in the WHI Clinical Trial data set to merge data sets. The WHIMS and WHI Clinical Trial data releases use the same participant ID. Page 3

The ECHO data can be appended to the previously released on trial and post trial/extension data for the classification of cognitive impairment. The variables F39DAYS (from the previous data) and TICSDAYS (from the current data) both represent time in days from randomization until cognitive testing/adjudicated classification. For further information about this data release, please contact Patricia Hogan at phogan@wakehealth.edu. Page 4

Appendix Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-modified (TICSm) is a widely-used measure of global cognitive functioning modeled after the Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) (Folstein, 1975; Brandt, 1988; Welsh, 1993). The TICSm is a 16-question test (range of scores 0 to 50) with items assessing subject s name, telephone number, date, counting backwards, word list recall, subtraction, responsive naming, repetition, President s name, Vice President s name, finger tapping, word opposites and a delayed word list recall. East Boston Memory Test (EBMT) measures verbal memory (Albert, 1991). Participants are read a short paragraph consisting of 12 distinct elements and immediately asked to recall as many elements as possible (immediate recall) and again 15 minutes later (delayed recall). Oral Trail Making Test (OTMT) is a modified version of the original TMT (Reitan, 1992), a widely used and well-validated measure of attention (Part A) and executive function (Part B). For Part A participants are asked to count from 1 to 25 as fast as they can. Part B requires them to recite an alternating numeric and alphanumeric sequence (1- A-2-B-3-C 13) as quickly as possible. The time to complete each task in seconds is the score. Verbal Fluency-Animals (VF-A) measures verbal fluency (Benton, 1968). This task requires participants to spontaneously name as many animals as possible during 1 minute. The total number of unique words is the score. Digit Span Test (DST) measures working memory (Wechsler, 1981). This task requires the participant to repeat sequentially series of single digit numbers of increasing length presented orally, first as presented (Digits Forward) and subsequently in reverse order (Digits Backwards). The score is the longest span of digits recalled. The sum of Digits Forward and Digits Backward (DST-Total) will be used. Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form (GDS_SF) measures depression (Yesavage, 1988; Burke, 1991). This 15-item (Y/N) questionnaire, which can be administered orally, has good psychometric properties, and has good normative data (Osborn, 2002; De Craen, 2003). Women s Health Initiative Insomnia Rating Scale (WHIIRS) measures sleep disturbance, which is related to cognitive function and hormonal variations (Levine, 2003). This 5-item self-report has excellent reliability, construct validity and is sensitive to change over time. California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) measures verbal learning and verbal memory. It was modified to consist of 3 learning trials of the same 16-item word list with Page 5

immediate recall of as many words as possible after each trial (Immediate Recall) to reduce administration time and participant burden. Dementia Questionnaire (DQ) is a semi-structured interview designed for a knowledgeable proxy to provide information needed to make a dementia and MCI diagnoses and to identify causes of cognitive impairment (Kawas et al., 1994). It covers six domains: memory and cognition, verbal expression, daily functioning, recognition of problems/insight, other medical and psychiatric problems, and medical contacts. Knowledgeable friends or family members also estimate the years of symptom onset. Page 6