Clinical significance of serum mir-196a in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer

Similar documents
A circulating serum mirna panel as early detection biomarkers of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

Low levels of serum mir-99a is a predictor of poor prognosis in breast cancer

Expression of mir-1294 is downregulated and predicts a poor prognosis in gastric cancer

Original Article High serum mir-203 predicts the poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer

Long non-coding RNA Loc is a potential prognostic biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer

Mir-595 is a significant indicator of poor patient prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer

CircHIPK3 is upregulated and predicts a poor prognosis in epithelial ovarian cancer

Expression of long non-coding RNA linc-itgb1 in breast cancer and its influence on prognosis and survival

Expression of mir-146a-5p in patients with intracranial aneurysms and its association with prognosis

Expression of lncrna TCONS_ in hepatocellular carcinoma and its influence on prognosis and survival

Downregulation of serum mir-17 and mir-106b levels in gastric cancer and benign gastric diseases

Original Article Reduced expression of mir-506 in glioma is associated with advanced tumor progression and unfavorable prognosis

Downregulation of long non-coding RNA LINC01133 is predictive of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients

Original Article Increased expression of microrna-196a predicts poor prognosis in human ovarian carcinoma

Association of mir-21 with esophageal cancer prognosis: a meta-analysis

Prognostic significance of overexpressed long non-coding RNA TUG1 in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Original Article Reduced serum mir-138 is associated with poor prognosis of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

Long non-coding RNA CCHE1 overexpression predicts a poor prognosis for cervical cancer

Association between downexpression of mir-1301 and poor prognosis in patients with glioma

Original Article Up-regulation of mir-10a and down-regulation of mir-148b serve as potential prognostic biomarkers for osteosarcoma

95% CI: , P=0.037).

Original Article microrna-217 was downregulated in ovarian cancer and was associated with poor prognosis

Circular RNA_LARP4 is lower expressed and serves as a potential biomarker of ovarian cancer prognosis

mir-218 tissue expression level is associated with aggressive progression of gastric cancer

Original Article Tissue expression level of lncrna UCA1 is a prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer

High Expression of Forkhead Box Protein C2 is Related to Poor Prognosis in Human Gliomas

Review Article Long Noncoding RNA H19 in Digestive System Cancers: A Meta-Analysis of Its Association with Pathological Features

Clinical impact of serum mir-661 in diagnosis and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer

The diagnostic value of determination of serum GOLPH3 associated with CA125, CA19.9 in patients with ovarian cancer

Serum mir-200c expression level as a prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer

High expression of fibroblast activation protein is an adverse prognosticator in gastric cancer.

Association between ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to pancreatic cancer

Genetic variability of genes involved in DNA repair influence treatment outcome in osteosarcoma

Overexpression of long-noncoding RNA ZFAS1 decreases survival in human NSCLC patients

Clinical significance of up-regulated lncrna NEAT1 in prognosis of ovarian cancer

Down-regulation of long non-coding RNA MEG3 serves as an unfavorable risk factor for survival of patients with breast cancer

Original Article Downregulation of microrna-26b functions as a potential prognostic marker for osteosarcoma

Plasma Bmil mrna as a potential prognostic biomarker for distant metastasis in colorectal cancer patients

Long noncoding RNA LINC01510 is highly expressed in colorectal cancer and predicts favorable prognosis

Long non-coding RNA FEZF1-AS1 is up-regulated and associated with poor prognosis in patients with cervical cancer

Original Article Expression of microrna (mir)-145 and mir-34a in different cervical lesion tissues of Uygur and Han females in Xinjiang, China

Decreased expression of mir-490-3p in osteosarcoma and its clinical significance

Long non-coding RNA TUSC7 expression is independently predictive of outcome in glioma

Expression and clinical implications of enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 and p53 protein in squamous cell carcinoma and precancerous lesions in the cervix

Original Article CREPT expression correlates with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma histological grade and clinical outcome

Original Article Reduced serum mir-142-3p predicates worse prognosis in patients with cervical cancer

Investigation on ERCC5 genetic polymorphisms and the development of gastric cancer in a Chinese population

Increased long noncoding RNA LINP1 expression and its prognostic significance in human breast cancer

Reduced mirna-218 expression in pancreatic cancer patients as a predictor of poor prognosis

Analysis of circulating long non-coding RNA UCA1 as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of osteosarcoma

mir-125a-5p expression is associated with the age of breast cancer patients

Correlation between serum level of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 18 and poor prognosis in breast cancer

Original Article Is there an association between ABO blood group and overall survival in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma?

Profiles of gene expression & diagnosis/prognosis of cancer. MCs in Advanced Genetics Ainoa Planas Riverola

Study on the expression of MMP-9 and NF-κB proteins in epithelial ovarian cancer tissue and their clinical value

Original Article MicroRNA-27a acts as a novel biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Clinicopathologic and prognostic relevance of mir-1256 in colorectal cancer: a preliminary clinical study

Downregulation of serum DKK-1 predicts poor prognosis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer

Cancer Cell Research 19 (2018)

Long non-coding RNA ROR is a novel prognosis factor associated with non-small-cell lung cancer progression

Increasing expression of mir-5100 in non-small-cell lung cancer and correlation with prognosis

MicroRNA expression profiling and functional analysis in prostate cancer. Marco Folini s.c. Ricerca Traslazionale DOSL

Long noncoding RNA PVT1 as a novel serum biomarker for detection of cervical cancer

Investigation of ERCC1 and ERCC2 gene polymorphisms and response to chemotherapy and overall survival in osteosarcoma

Up-regulation of serum mir-4262 predicts clinical outcome of patients with acute myeloid leukemia

Correlation between expression and significance of δ-catenin, CD31, and VEGF of non-small cell lung cancer

Overexpression of LncRNA FER1L4 in endometrial carcinoma is associated with favorable survival outcome

Lack of association between an insertion/ deletion polymorphism in IL1A and risk of colorectal cancer

mirna Dr. S Hosseini-Asl

DIAGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF CHANGES IN SERUM HUMAN EPIDIDYMIS EPITHELIAL SECRETORY PROTEIN 4 AND CARBOHYDRATE ANTIGEN 125 IN ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA

Long noncoding RNA linc-ubc1 promotes tumor invasion and metastasis by regulating EZH2 and repressing E-cadherin in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Introduction. Acta Medica Mediterranea, 2018, 34: 1441 ABSTRACT

Supplementary Information

MiR-508-5p is a prognostic marker and inhibits cell proliferation and migration in glioma

Original Article Downregulation of serum mir-140-5p predicts poor prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer

GUOPEI LUO, PhD, MD. Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China. Joint-trained Ph.D. student, from 2008 to 2009, University of California, Irvine

The clinical significance of HPIP and the associated prognosis in cervical cancer

microrna Presented for: Presented by: Date:

mir-146a and mir-196a2 polymorphisms in ovarian cancer risk

A meta-analysis of the effect of microrna-34a on the progression and prognosis of gastric cancer

Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2016;9(3): /ISSN: /IJCEP

MicroRNA-1908 is a biomarker for poor prognosis in human osteosarcoma

Down-regulation of mir p is correlated with clinical progression and unfavorable prognosis in gastric cancer

Upregulation of LncRNA PANDAR predicts poor prognosis and promotes cell proliferation in cervical cancer

Review Article Prognostic Role of MicroRNA-200c-141 Cluster in Various Human Solid Malignant Neoplasms

Original Article MicroRNA-101 is a novel biomarker for diagnosis and prognosis in breast cancer

The clinicopathological features and treatment modalities associated with survival of neuroendocrine cervical carcinoma in a Chinese population

Decreased mir-198 expression and its prognostic significance in human gastric cancer

Lack of association between ERCC5 gene polymorphisms and gastric cancer risk in a Chinese population

Epstein-Barr virus driven promoter hypermethylated genes in gastric cancer

Original Article Down-regulation of tissue microrna-126 was associated with poor prognosis in patients with cutaneous melanoma

Circulating microrna-137 is a potential biomarker for human glioblastoma

Downregulation of microrna-196a inhibits human liver cancer cell proliferation and invasion by targeting FOXO1

A study on clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of patients with upper gastric cancer and middle and lower gastric cancer.

Analysis of Lymph Node Metastasis Correlation with Prognosis in Patients with T2 Gastric Cancer

Woo Dae Kang, Ho Sun Choi, Seok Mo Kim

Prognostic Impact of Hyperglycemia in Patients with Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Cervix Receiving Definite Radiotherapy

The clinical relevance of circulating, cell-free and exosomal micrornas as biomarkers for gynecological tumors

Evaluation of mir-182/mir-100 Ratio for Diagnosis and Survival Prediction in Bladder Cancer

CORRELATION BETWEEN SURVIVIN OVEREXPRESSION AND CLINICO-PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF INVASIVE CERVICAL CANCER: A META-ANALYSIS

Transcription:

Clinical significance of serum mir-196a in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer P. Liu 1, F. Xin 1 and C.F. Ma 2 1 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Baoding Second Central Hospital, Baoding, Hebei, China 2 Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Maternity & Child Health Hospital, Zhouzhou, Hebei, China Corresponding author: P. Liu E-mail: peng_liuog@163.com Genet. Mol. Res. 14 (4): 17995-18002 (2015) Received July 23, 2015 Accepted October 15, 2015 Published December 22, 2015 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/2015.december.22.25 ABSTRACT. Previous studies have reported that mir-196a is upregulated in cervical cancer tissues and cell lines. However, whether serum mir- 196a is increased in patients with cervical cancer or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), and its potential clinical value remained unknown. In total, 105 cervical cancer patients, 86 CIN patients, and 50 healthy volunteers were recruited. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction was performed to compare the serum levels mir-196a in all participants. The associations between serum mir-196a and CIN grade/ clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer were also examined. A survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to explore the independent risk factors for cervical cancer. Our results revealed that serum mir- 196a levels were higher in patients with cervical cancer (P < 0.01) and CIN (P < 0.05) compared to those in healthy controls. Serum mir-196a was associated with CIN grade and various cervical cancer parameters including tumor size (P = 0.031), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.018),

P. Liu et al. 17996 FIGO stage (P = 0.004), and grade (P = 0.011). Cervical cancer patients with higher serum mir-196a levels had a poorer overall survival rate (P = 0.004). Multivariate analysis revealed that high serum mir-196a was an independent predictor for poor survival of cervical cancer (HR = 3.510; 95%CI = 1.961-6.874; P = 0.025). In conclusion, our findings suggest that serum mir-196a overexpression is associated with CIN grade and cervical cancer progression. Therefore, serum mir-196a may be a reliable biomarker for early detection and prognosis of cervical cancer. Key words: Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; Cervical cancer; mir-196a; Prognosis; Biomarker INTRODUCATION Cervical cancer remains the second most common female malignancy after breast cancer, accounting for approximately 529,800 new cases and 275,100 deaths each year worldwide (Ferlay et al., 2010). Cervical cancer progresses slowly from pre-invasive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN; scaled 1-3) to invasive stages. Approximately 20% of CIN2 lesions progress to CIN3, and 10-40% of CIN3 develop into cervical cancer (McCredie et al., 2008; Castle et al., 2009). Human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is the number one risk factor for cervical cancer, and additional risk factors include smoking, parity, and oral contraceptives. Currently, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy are first-line treatments for cervical cancer. As treatment outcomes are closely related to the clinical stage, screening cervical cancer at an early stage of CIN is crucial to reduce mortality rates. Biomarkers with high specificity and sensitivity for cervical cancer and/or CIN are still lacking, thus the identification of novel biomarkers for cervical cancer/cin screening is important. mirnas are generally 21-25-nucleotide, non-coding-rnas that regulate gene expression at the post-transcriptional level. mirnas have been shown to participate in almost every cellular process investigated to date, and alterations in mirna expression are associated with many human diseases including cancer (Wijnhoven et al., 2007; Melo et al., 2011). The regulatory role of mirnas is complex as they may function either as oncogenes or tumor suppressors, depending on the effects of their targeted genes. Currently three mir-196 members (mir-196a-1, mir-196a-2 and mir-196b) have been identified, and mir-196a genes are located within the HOX gene clusters (Chen et al., 2011). mir-196a has been reported to promote tumorigenesis in multiple types of cancers such as pancreatic cancer, glioma, lung cancer, and ovarian cancer (Kong et al., 2011; Liu et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2014; Fan et al., 2015). Furthermore, serum levels of mir-196a were significantly increased in patients with pancreatic cancer, and higher serum levels were associated with advanced clinical stage and shorter survival time (Kong et al., 2011). The mir-196a gene polymorphism has also been shown to contribute to cancer risk and susceptibility (Dou et al., 2010; Lee et al., 2014), suggesting it has an oncogenic role during the development of cancer. It has previously been shown that mir-196a is overexpressed in both cervical cancer tissues and cervical cancer cell lines (Villegas-Ruiz et al., 2014). However, whether serum mir- 196a is upregulated in patients with CIN or cervical cancer remained unknown. Moreover, the potential clinical value of serum mir-196a had not yet been investigation. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine whether there is an association between serum mir-196a levels and CIN/ cervical cancer.

Serum mir-196a in CIN and cervical cancer 17997 MATERIAL AND METHODS Study design and population This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Baoding Second Central Hospital and written informed consent was obtained from all the participants. In total, 105 cervical cancer patients, 86 CIN patients, and 50 healthy controls who received therapy or had a physical examination in the Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology at the Baoding Second Central Hospital were recruited. The diagnoses of both cervical cancer and CIN were pathologically confirmed. The clinical staging of cervical cancer was done according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) grading system. None of the patients received any kind of therapy before serum sample collection. The clinical characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1. Table 1. Serum mir-196a levels and clinicopathological characteristics of cervical cancer patients. Parameters Group Total (N) Serum mir-196a (N) P value Age (years) 50 64 38 26 0.299 >50 41 29 12 Tumor size (cm) 4 72 51 21 0.031 >4 33 16 17 Lymph node metastasis No 68 49 19 0.018 Yes 37 18 19 Cell type SCC 84 56 28 0.310 Others 21 11 10 Parametrial infiltration No 70 47 23 0.390 Yes 35 20 15 FIGO stage Ι-II 74 54 20 0.004 III-IV 31 13 18 Grade Well/Moderate 77 55 22 0.011 Poor 28 12 16 HPV infection No 13 6 7 0.218 Yes 92 61 31 Low High Quantitative reverse transcription-pcr (qrt-pcr) Approximately 8 ml venous blood was drawn from study participants, and then the samples were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 5 min at 4 C in order to separate the serum from cellular components. The serum was immediately frozen and stored at -80 C until use. Total RNA was isolated from serum using the Qiagen mirneasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer protocol. cdna was synthesized using the miscript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen). qrt-pcr was conducted on the Mx3005P qpcr System (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The PCR conditions were 94 C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 C for 15 s, and 60 C for 60 s. The level of serum mir-196a was calculated and assessed using the 2 -ΔΔCt method. Each sample was assayed in triplicate and RNU6B was used as the internal control for normalization. Statistical analysis All statistical analyses were performed with the SPSS 20 software (IBM SPSS Statistics,

P. Liu et al. 17998 Armonk, NY, USA). The serum levels of mir-196a in cervical cancer patients, CIN patients, and healthy volunteers were compared using one-way ANOVA. Chi-square tests were performed to examine the associations between serum mir-196a levels and CIN grade/clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer. The correlation between serum mir-196a levels and a 5-year overall survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to explore independent prognostic factors for cervical cancer. All reported P values were twotailed and a P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS Serum mir-196a levels in patients with cervical cancer and CIN qrt-pcr was performed to examine the levels of serum mir-196a in cervical cancer patients, CIN patients, and healthy volunteers. The results show that patients with cervical cancer had a significantly higher level of serum mir-196a than those of CIN patients (P < 0.05) and controls (P < 0.01). Similarly, serum mir-196a was significantly upregulated in CIN patients compared to that of the healthy volunteers (P < 0.05; Figure 1). Figure 1. Expression level of serum mir-196a in patients with cervical cancer and CIN. The cervical cancer patients had a significantly higher level of serum mir-196a than CIN patients (P < 0.05) and controls (P < 0.01). Similarly, the expression level of serum mir-196a was significantly increased in CIN patients compared to that of the healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). Association between serum mir-196a levels and the clinicopathological parameters of cervical cancer The 105 cervical cancer patients were split into two groups (low or high) based on the mean serum level of mir-196a (higher or lower than the mean value of 3.88). The results show that serum mir-196a levels are associated with various clinical parameters including tumor size (P =

Serum mir-196a in CIN and cervical cancer 17999 0.031), LN metastasis (P = 0.018), FIGO stage (P = 0.004), and grade (P = 0.011). However, mir- 196a levels were not correlated with age (P = 0.299), cell type (P = 0.310), parametrial infiltration (P = 0.390), or HPV infection (P = 0.218; Table 1). Association between serum mir-196a levels and CIN grade The mean level of serum mir-196a in CIN patients (mean relative expression of 2.92) was used as cut-off point to divide the 86 patients with CIN into a high serum mir-196a group (N = 40) and low serum mir-196a group (N = 46). 67% of CIN3 patients were in the high serum mir- 196a group, which was significantly more than that of CIN2 patients (32%; P = 0.010) and CIN1 patients (21%; P = 0.001). No significant difference was detected between CIN1 and CIN2 patients regarding the serum mir-196a distribution pattern (P = 0.507; Table 2). Table 2. Correlation between serum mir-196a expression and CIN grade. Serum mir-196a CIN1 (N) CIN2 (N) CIN3 (N) High expression 4 8 28 Low expression 15 17 14 P value 0.507 (CIN1 vs CIN 2) 0.010 (CIN2 vs CIN3) 0.001 (CIN3 vs CIN1) Serum mir-196a levels and cervical cancer prognosis The association between serum mir-196a levels and the overall survival of cervical cancer was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The five-year overall survival rate of patients in the high serum mir-196a group was 39.47%, which was significantly lower than that of patients (73.13%) in the low serum mir-196a group (P = 0.004; Figure 2). Figure 2. Association between serum mir-196a levels and overall survival. The five-year overall survival rate of cervical cancer patients in the high serum mir-196a group was significantly lower than that of the low serum mir-196a group (P = 0.004).

P. Liu et al. 18000 The univariate analysis showed that LN metastasis (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.342; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.524-4.325; P = 0.038), FIGO stage (HR = 3.814; 95%CI = 2.374-6.964; P = 0.006), grade (HR = 2.747; 95%CI = 1.867-5.214; P = 0.024), and serum mir-196a levels (HR = 3.102; 95%CI = 2.031-5.775; P = 0.013) were prognostic factors for cervical cancer. The multivariate analysis revealed that FIGO stage (HR = 4.254; 95%CI = 2.552-8.365; P = 0.009), grade (HR = 3.173; 95%CI = 1.633-5.306; P = 0.036), and serum mir-196a levels (HR = 3.510; 95%CI = 1.961-6.874; P = 0.025) were independent factors associated with survival in cervical cancer (Table 3). Table 3. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the association between clinical parameters and overall survival. Parameters Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis HR 95%CI P value HR 95%CI P value Age 1.125 0.436-1.541 0.547 Tumor size 1.734 0.917-2.457 0.116 Lymph node metastasis 2.342 1.524-4.325 0.038 1.568 0.917-2.684 0.338 Cell type 1.057 0.637-1.263 0.745 Parametrial infiltration 1.463 0.865-2.191 0.217 FIGO stage 3.814 2.374-6.964 0.006 4.254 2.552-8.365 0.009 Grade 2.747 1.867-5.214 0.024 3.173 1.633-5.306 0.036 HPV infection 1.278 0.748-1.819 0.385 Serum mir-196a 3.102 2.031-5.775 0.013 3.510 1.961-6.874 0.025 DISCUSSION Cervical cancer, a malignant disease of the cervix, remains one of the leading causes of cancer deaths globally. The clinical outcome of patients with cervical cancer depends mainly on the clinical stage at which therapy is initiated. Although the prognosis of cervical cancer has substantially improved over the past decades, patients with advanced stage cervical cancer have poor overall survival. To improve outcomes of this deadly disease, identifying new molecular biomarkers for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis is an effective strategy. CIN is a precancerous lesion that can develop into cervical cancer. If CIN is detected and treated effectively, the incidence of cervical cancer is significantly reduced. Unfortunately, there are currently no known specific markers for cervical cancer and/or CIN, thus regular screening is extremely important. mirnas may function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors in cancer development. Alteration in mirna expression is closely correlated with tumor initiation, promotion, and progression via its effects on downstream target genes. Therefore, the identification of mirnas associated with clinical features and prognosis of cancer may be valuable as biomarkers for clinical use. Deregulation of mir-196a is a frequent event in cancer, indicating its crucial role in tumorigenesis. In addition to cancer progression, mir-196a was shown to be involved in several important biological functions related to development, cell differentiation, immunology, inflammation, and viral defense (Chen et al., 2011). For example, the misexpression of mir-196a in the anterior of Xenopus laevis embryos caused eye anomalies (Qiu et al., 2009). Moreover, Kim et al. (2009) showed that mir-196a was an important regulator for the proliferation and osteogenic differentiation of human adipose tissuederived mesenchymal stem cells. In the present study, our results show that serum mir-196a levels were upregulated in patients with cervical cancer or CIN compared to those of healthy controls. Moreover, serum mir- 196a levels were associated with CIN grade and various important clinical parameters of cervical

Serum mir-196a in CIN and cervical cancer 18001 cancer. Additionally, cervical cancer patients with higher serum mir-196a levels had a poorer overall survival rate. Multivariate analysis revealed that serum mir-196a was an independent risk factor for cervical cancer, indicating that serum mir-196a may be a promising prognostic biomarker. Similar to our results, previous studies have found that mir-196a is overexpressed in cervical cancer tissues, CIN tissues, and cervical cancer cell lines (Gocze et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2013; Villegas- Ruiz et al., 2014; Hou et al., 2014). Specifically, Hou et al. (2014) reported that upregulation of tissue mir-196a in patients with cervical cancer was associated with poor clinical outcome, indicating that mir-196a may function as an oncogene in cervical cancer. Moreover, mir-196a was shown to promote the proliferation of cervical cancer cell lines via regulation of FOXO1 and p27kip1 directly (Hou et al., 2014). Netrin 4 (NTN4) is a direct target of mir-196a and its expression is inversely correlated with mir-196a expression. Ectopic expression of mir-196a promotes the proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cell lines through downregulation of NTN4, whereas the opposite was observed upon mir-196a suppression (Zhang et al., 2013). mir-196a has also been reported to play oncogenic roles in a number of types of cancers. Overexpression of mir-196a increased cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition in head and neck cancer, whereas reduced oncogenic behavior was observed with mir-196a inhibition (Suh et al., 2014). Huang et al. (2014) showed that mir-196a was upregulated in pancreatic cancer cell lines, and may play an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation and migration by interacting with its metastasis-related target gene nuclear factor-kappa-b-inhibitor alpha. Higher expression of tissue mir-196a was detected in patients with gastric cancer and was associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, mir-196a has been shown to promote gastric carcinogenesis both in vitro and in vivo (Sun et al., 2012; Tsai et al., 2014). While most studies have suggested that mir-196a enhances tumorigenesis in cancer, its role in tumor suppression cannot be ignored. For example, the expression level of mir-196a was shown to be reduced in melanoma cells compared to that in healthy melanocytes. mir-196a downregulation can lead to HOX-B7 and BMP-4 overexpression, which may be responsible for the early steps of melanoma development (Braig et al., 2010). Li et al. (2010) showed that overexpression of mir-196a or mir-196b inhibited the invasion and metastatic capacity of breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo, suggesting mir-196a may play a role in tumor suppression in breast cancer. This contradictory role of mir-196a in regulating cancer development is poorly understood. It is possible that the function of mir-196a depends on the cancer cell type and on the specific tumor microenvironment in which the cells reside. Hence, further investigations are needed to reveal the complex role mir-196a in different cancers. In conclusion, increased serum mir-196a was associated with higher CIN grade, and correlated with poorer prognosis in cervical cancer patients. Therefore, serum mir-196a may be a promising biomarker for both CIN and cervical cancer. Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest. REFERENCES Braig S, Mueller DW, Rothhammer T and Bosserhoff AK (2010). MicroRNA mir-196a is a central regulator of HOX-B7 and BMP4 expression in malignant melanoma. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 67: 3535-3548. Castle PE, Schiffman M, Wheeler CM and Solomon D (2009). Evidence for frequent regression of cervical intraepithelial

P. Liu et al. 18002 neoplasia-grade 2. Obstet. Gynecol. 113: 18-25. Chen C, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Weakley SM et al. (2011). MicroRNA-196: critical roles and clinical applications in development and cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 15: 14-23. Dou T, Wu Q, Chen X, Ribas J, et al. (2010). A polymorphism of microrna196a genome region was associated with decreased risk of glioma in Chinese population. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 136: 1853-1859. Fan Y, Fan J, Huang L, Ye M, et al. (2015). Increased expression of microrna-196a predicts poor prognosis in human ovarian carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 8: 4132-4137. Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, et al. (2010). Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int. J. Cancer 127: 2893-2917. Gocze K, Gombos K, Juhasz K, Kovacs K, et al. (2013). Unique microrna expression profiles in cervical cancer. Anticancer Res. 33: 2561-2567. Hou T, Ou J, Zhao X, Huang X, et al. (2014). MicroRNA-196a promotes cervical cancer proliferation through the regulation of FOXO1 and p27kip1. Br. J. Cancer 110: 1260-1268. Huang F, Tang J, Zhuang X, Zhuang Y, et al. (2014). MiR-196a promotes pancreatic cancer progression by targeting nuclear factor kappa-b-inhibitor alpha. PLoS One 9: e87897. Kim YJ, Bae SW, Yu SS, Bae YC, et al. (2009). mir-196a regulates proliferation and osteogenic differentiation in mesenchymal stem cells derived from human adipose tissue. J. Bone Miner. Res. 24: 816-825. Kong X, Du Y, Wang G, Gao J, et al. (2011). Detection of differentially expressed micrornas in serum of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: mir-196a could be a potential marker for poor prognosis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 56: 602-609. Lee SJ, Seo JW, Chae YS, Kim JG, et al. (2014). Genetic polymorphism of mir-196a as a prognostic biomarker for early breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 34: 2943-2949. Li Y, Zhang M, Chen H, Dong Z, et al. (2010). Ratio of mir-196s to HOXC8 messenger RNA correlates with breast cancer cell migration and metastasis. Cancer Res. 70: 7894-7904. Liu XH, Lu KH, Wang KM, Sun M, et al. (2012). MicroRNA-196a promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion through targeting HOXA5. BMC Cancer 12: 348. McCredie MR, Sharples KJ, Paul C, Baranyai J, et al. (2008). Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 9: 425-434. Melo SA and Esteller M (2011). Dysregulation of micrornas in cancer: playing with fire. FEBS Lett. 585: 2087-2099. Qiu R, Liu Y, Wu JY, Liu K, et al. (2009). Misexpression of mir-196a induces eye anomaly in Xenopus laevis. Brain Res. Bull. 79: 26-31. Suh YE, Raulf N, Gäken J, Lawler K, et al. (2014). MicroRNA-196a promotes an oncogenic effect in head and neck cancer cells by suppressing annexin A1 and enhancing radioresistance. Int. J. Cancer 137: 1021-1034. Sun M, Liu XH, Li JH, Yang, JS, et al. (2012). MiR-196a is upregulated in gastric cancer and promotes cell proliferation by downregulating p27(kip1). Mol. Cancer Ther. 11: 842-852. Tsai MM, Wang CS, Tsai CY, Chen CY, et al. (2014). MicroRNA-196a/-196b promote cell metastasis via negative regulation of radixin in human gastric cancer. Cancer Lett. 351: 222-231. Villegas-Ruiz V, Juárez-Méndez S, Pérez-González OA, Arreola H, et al. (2014). Heterogeneity of micrornas expression in cervical cancer cells: over-expression of mir-196a. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 7: 1389-1401. Wijnhoven BP, Michael MZ and Watson DI (2007). MicroRNAs and cancer. Br. J. Surg. 94: 23-30. Yang G, Han D, Chen X, Zhang D, et al. (2014). MiR-196a exerts its oncogenic effect in glioblastoma multiforme by inhibition of IκBα both in vitro and in vivo. Neuro. Oncol. 16: 652-661. Zhang J, Zheng F, Yu G, Yin Y, et al. (2013). mir-196a targets netrin 4 and regulates cell proliferation and migration of cervical cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 440: 582-588.